Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #721880 > unrolled thread

Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
Last post2019-01-18 21:09 -0800
Articles 20 on this page of 249 — 25 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 03:52 -0700
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-03 22:30 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 09:31 -0500
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 10:24 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 13:56 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 12:01 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-04 18:12 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-05 11:28 -0600
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-05 13:07 -0500
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:01 +0000
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 09:33 -0500
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-09 10:33 -0600
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:18 +0000
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-09 23:24 -0600
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 10:59 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:22 -0800
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:02 +0000
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 00:25 -0800
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:54 +0000
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000
                          NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000
                                Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600
                                  Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600
                                    Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800
                              Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700
                                Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800
                                  Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700
                            Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000
                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800
                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-15 02:28 +0000
                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 20:58 -0800
                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-15 00:03 -0700
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 23:52 -0800
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:36 -0700
                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 04:04 +0000
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:38 +0000
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:49 -0800
                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:41 -0800
                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:45 +0000
                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 14:53 -0600
                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:57 +0000
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 15:05 -0600
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:50 -0800
                                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:23 +0000
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-16 20:31 -0500
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-16 18:40 -0700
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 19:02 -0700
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:09 +0000
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:48 -0800
                                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
                                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
                                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
                                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
                                                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
                                                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
                                                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
                                                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
                                                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
                                                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 06:24 +0000
                                                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 23:28 -0800
                                                                    Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 22:09 +0000
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 15:22 -0700
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:27 -0500
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:20 -0700
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:32 -0500
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:40 -0700
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:46 -0500
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:55 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 22:26 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:38 -0800
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 15:11 -0800
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 00:29 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:33 -0700
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0800
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 18:57 -0800
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 03:48 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:58 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:57 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:44 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:48 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:25 +0000
                                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:44 -0800
                                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:33 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:53 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:59 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0800
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:49 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 17:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 20:58 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 21:00 -0800
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-20 09:17 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
                                                                                          Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800
                                                                                            Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800
                                                                                                Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700
                                                                                        Nadegda can't handle the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000
                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800
                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800
                                                                                          Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800
                                                                              Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000
                                                                                Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800
                                                                                  Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700
                                                                      Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800
                                                                        Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:12 -0800
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 15:22 -0500
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-10 15:28 -0600
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:03 +0000
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 19:26 -0800
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:20 +0000
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:57 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-01-20 07:29 +0000
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 05:55 -0500
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-01 16:07 +0000
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-01 10:36 -0700
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 09:38 -0800
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 11:49 -0600
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:23 -0500
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:27 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:33 -0500
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:38 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:37 -0700
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:41 -0700
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
                                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
                                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
                  Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
                    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
                      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
                        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
                          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
                            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
                              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:57 -0700
                                Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:06 -0700
            Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-01 12:48 -0800
              Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
    Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-17 20:23 -0800
      Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 00:13 -0700
        Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:34 -0800
          Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800

Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13  Next page →


#723712

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
Message-ID<q1qv47$jk8$13@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723662
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:48:41 -0800, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q1p2mj$jk8$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...

[trim]

> your Libtard sock.

Proof, kooky?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723715

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
Message-ID<btnl81.fit.19.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#723712
On 2019-01-17 3:20 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:48:41 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> 
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <q1p2mj$jk8$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> [trim]
> 
>> your Libtard sock.
> 
> Proof, kooky?
> 
your lips must've developed a permanent pout by now from ,
repeating the words , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
your posts are as stupid to read as kensi posts

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723752

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36aae0d97118fbe7996026@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723715
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <btnl81.fit.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


# 
# On 2019-01-17 3:20 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
# > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:48:41 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > 
# >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# >> Checkmate!  In article <q1p2mj$jk8$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# >> @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > [trim]
# > 
# >> your Libtard sock.
# > 
# > Proof, kooky?
# > 
# your lips must've developed a permanent pout by now from ,
# repeating the words , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
# your posts are as stupid to read as kensi posts

That's very similar to the way Fakey finally went out, too.  Wait for it, 
'cuz it's a-comin'...

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723753

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
Message-ID<bto58s.3hk.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#723752
On 2019-01-17 7:59 p.m., Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <btnl81.fit.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com
> says...
> 
> 
> #
> # On 2019-01-17 3:20 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> # > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> # > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:48:41 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # >
> # >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> # >> Checkmate!  In article <q1p2mj$jk8$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> # >> @gmail.invalid says...
> # >
> # > [trim]
> # >
> # >> your Libtard sock.
> # >
> # > Proof, kooky?
> # >
> # your lips must've developed a permanent pout by now from ,
> # repeating the words , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
> # your posts are as stupid to read as kensi posts
> 
> That's very similar to the way Fakey finally went out, too.  Wait for it,
> 'cuz it's a-comin'...
> 

well get a fk'in grip for anything's sake ,
gawd she need a man but , i can't even buy a juicer that looks twice

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723745

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36aade3cc9fe06bb996024@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723712
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1qv47$jk8$13@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:48:41 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1p2mj$jk8$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# 
# [trim]
# 
# > your Libtard sock.
# 
# Proof, kooky?

I don't divulge my sources, Kookier.

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723682

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
Message-ID<btn2nv.qdp.19.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#723648
On 2019-01-16 10:09 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 18:40:16 -0700, Just Wondering wrote:
> 
>> On 1/16/2019 6:23 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>> You *are* aware that Christmas is at the same time of the year for
>>> everyone, right?
>>
>> "Christmas is celebrated on Jan. 6th in Turkey".
>> https://www.reference.com/holidays-celebrations/turkish-people-celebrate-
> christmas-48546228d9a8390
>>
>> "Orthodox Churches in Russia, Serbia, Jerusalem, Ukraine, Ethiopia and
>> other countries use the old 'Julian' calendar and people in those
>> churches celebrate Christmas on January 7th."
>> https://www.whychristmas.com/customs/whenchristmasiscelebrated.shtml
> 
> All of which cluster within the same two-week interval when several people
> who post here were on vacation.
> 
> Thank you for making my point for me, kooky.
> 
> <snicker>
> 

someone had to there's no way you ever could

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723633

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.36a98e51872b4016943@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#723626
In article <q1olfe$jk8$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:50:12 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <q1o5ru$jk8$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>> 
>> 
>> # > so... when are the next awards,
>> #
>> # That's up to Libtard, but presumably, early February.
>> #
>> 
>> We all noticed Libtard was absent the same time you were.
>
>You *are* aware that Christmas is at the same time of the year for 
>everyone, right?

Most people in the Greek Orthodox Church celebrate Christmas on December 
25th. But some still use the Julian calendar and so celebrate Christmas 
on 7th January! Some Greek Catholics also celebrate on January 7th. In 
Armenia, the Apostolic Church celebrates Christmas on January 6th.


https://www.whychristmas.com/customs/whenchristmasiscelebrated.shtml

SMACKDOWN!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723645

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36a9a277fc3185a3996006@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723626
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1olfe$jk8$8@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:50:12 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1o5ru$jk8$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > 
# > # > so... when are the next awards,
# > #
# > # That's up to Libtard, but presumably, early February.
# > #
# > 
# > We all noticed Libtard was absent the same time you were.
# 
# You *are* aware that Christmas is at the same time of the year for 
# everyone, right?

Oh, well then... I guess *that* explains why Libtard isn't around when 
your hand isn't around.

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723607

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36a946a085745122995ffa@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723597
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > 
# > #
# > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > #
# > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
# > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > # > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # >
# > # >
# > # > #
# > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > #
# > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
# > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>,
# > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # >
# > # > # >
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > snowflakes,
# > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
# > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
# > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
# > says...
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
# > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
# > says...
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast
# > # > climate # > # > change #
# > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
# > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns,
# > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > melt!
# > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few
# > # > months # > after # > I #
# > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really been that
# > long?
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do
# > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your interlocutor in the third
# > person # > rather # > than the # > second?
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked
# > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
# > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".  That whole #
# > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or three months, and the
# > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # > happen. HINT:  It
# > wasn't you.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in Google's
# > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi and me slapping
# > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012) have # somehow been faked. You now
# > need a # > huge conspiracy # > theory # > including a # complicit Google
# > if you # > want to continue making # > your # > untenable k'lame.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China" plastic
# > a # > HoT? # > #
# > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or "Kensi"
# > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there were both. I
# > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add here, other than to
# > reiterate that #
# > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying to
# > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or you're stark raving
# > bonkers.
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back # > then.
# >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a different
# > sock... # >
# > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on "stark
# > raving # > # > bonkers"
# > # > # > # as the explanation.
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # >
# > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012.  You're
# > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on fire.
# > # > #
# > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over again in the
# > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20 on the hit die while
# > someone,
# > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
# > # > #
# > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
# > # >
# > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
# > #
# > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
# > 
# > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts in late
# > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey rode in on.
# > That's when you buffoons got that stupid "Tetrarchy" idea to take over
# > the Ko0k Awards, which I had either already destroyed, or was in the
# > process of destroying.  It doesn't change the fact that the "Tetrarchy"
# > blew up in your face, and over six years later, you've yet to fulfill
# > your dream of being an FNVW and resurrecting that which I destroyed.  Of
# > course you'll deny that, but everyone knows better.
# 
# More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was* active in 
# 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history, such as my two-year 
# stint as FNVW 2015-2017.

Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe it 
better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you flailed around 
miserably, until you finally tried to give away That-Which-Never-Existed, 
to no less that three different bonafied Ko0ks, who were smart enough to 
want nothing to do with TWNE.  Then, your new Libtard sock tried to make 
a go of it, and seldom even attempted to run a vote except very 
sporadically.  The fact is, you failed on all accounts.  You could never 
be an FNVW, because you're one of the biggest Ko0ks here.

Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other K0oks, but 
you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my your often 
hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom you declared was a 
rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you claim to be a Ko0kologist, 
given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden variety, 
run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723627

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
Message-ID<q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723607
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> #
> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> #
> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> # >
> # >
> # > #
> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > #
> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>,
> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
> # > # >
> # > # >
> # > # > #
> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> snowflakes,
> # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > #
> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
> <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
> says...
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
> says...
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate
> wrote:
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
> when #
> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
> # >
> # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings
> outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
> # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
> # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns,
> # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
> Melt,
> # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > melt!
> # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate
> wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a
> few # > # > months # > after # > I #
> # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really been that
> # > long?
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine.
> Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your interlocutor in
> the third # > person # > rather # > than the # > second?
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked
> # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
> # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".  That
> whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or three months,
> and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # > happen.
> HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in
> Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi
> and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012) have # somehow
> been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # > theory # >
> including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue making #
> > your # > untenable k'lame.
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too.
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China"
> plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
> # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or
> "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there were both.
> I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add here, other than to
> # > reiterate that #
> # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying to
> # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or you're stark raving #
> > bonkers.
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back # >
> then.
> # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a different #
> > sock... # >
> # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on "stark
> # > raving # > # > bonkers"
> # > # > # > # as the explanation.
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012. 
> You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on
> fire.
> # > # > #
> # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over again in
> the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20 on the hit die
> while # > someone,
> # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
> # > # > #
> # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
> # > # >
> # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
> # > #
> # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
> # >
> # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts in late #
> > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey rode in
> on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid "Tetrarchy" idea to
> take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had either already destroyed, or
> was in the # > process of destroying.  It doesn't change the fact that
> the "Tetrarchy" # > blew up in your face, and over six years later,
> you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and resurrecting
> that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny that, but everyone
> knows better.
> #
> # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was* active in #
> 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history, such as my two-year #
> stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
> 
> Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe it
> better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you flailed around
> miserably, until you finally tried to give away
> That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied
> Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.  Then,
> your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even
> attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is, you
> failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because you're one
> of the biggest Ko0ks here.
> 
> Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other K0oks,
> but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my your
> often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom you declared
> was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you claim to be a
> Ko0kologist,
> given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden
> variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.

Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723628

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
Message-ID<btlbci.g61.19.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#723627
On 2019-01-16 6:24 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> 
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>
>>
>> #
>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> #
>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>> # >
>> # >
>> # > #
>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > #
>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>,
>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # >
>> # > # >
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> snowflakes,
>> # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>> <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>> says...
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
>> says...
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate
>> wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> when #
>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>> # >
>> # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings
>> outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
>> # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns,
>> # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>> Melt,
>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>> # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate
>> wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a
>> few # > # > months # > after # > I #
>> # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really been that
>> # > long?
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine.
>> Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your interlocutor in
>> the third # > person # > rather # > than the # > second?
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked
>> # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>> # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".  That
>> whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or three months,
>> and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # > happen.
>> HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in
>> Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi
>> and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012) have # somehow
>> been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # > theory # >
>> including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue making #
>>> your # > untenable k'lame.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China"
>> plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or
>> "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there were both.
>> I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add here, other than to
>> # > reiterate that #
>> # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying to
>> # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or you're stark raving #
>>> bonkers.
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back # >
>> then.
>> # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a different #
>>> sock... # >
>> # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on "stark
>> # > raving # > # > bonkers"
>> # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012.
>> You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on
>> fire.
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over again in
>> the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20 on the hit die
>> while # > someone,
>> # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
>> # > # >
>> # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
>> # > #
>> # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>> # >
>> # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts in late #
>>> September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey rode in
>> on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid "Tetrarchy" idea to
>> take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had either already destroyed, or
>> was in the # > process of destroying.  It doesn't change the fact that
>> the "Tetrarchy" # > blew up in your face, and over six years later,
>> you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and resurrecting
>> that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny that, but everyone
>> knows better.
>> #
>> # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was* active in #
>> 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history, such as my two-year #
>> stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>>
>> Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe it
>> better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you flailed around
>> miserably, until you finally tried to give away
>> That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied
>> Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.  Then,
>> your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even
>> attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is, you
>> failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because you're one
>> of the biggest Ko0ks here.
>>
>> Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other K0oks,
>> but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my your
>> often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom you declared
>> was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you claim to be a
>> Ko0kologist,
>> given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden
>> variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
> 
> Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
> 
> <snicker>
> 

remember the childhood abuse you enjoyed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723634

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.36a98e6aba4d527c944@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#723627
In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
says...
>
>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>> 
>> 
>> #
>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> #
>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
>> > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # >
>> # >
>> # > #
>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > #
>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>,
>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # >
>> # > # >
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> snowflakes,
>> # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>> <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>> says...
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
>> says...
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate
>> wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> when #
>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>> # >
>> # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings
>> outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
>> # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns,
>> # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>> Melt,
>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>> # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate
>> wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a
>> few # > # > months # > after # > I #
>> # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really been that
>> # > long?
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine.
>> Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your interlocutor in
>> the third # > person # > rather # > than the # > second?
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked
>> # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>> # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".  That
>> whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or three months,
>> and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # > happen.
>> HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in
>> Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi
>> and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012) have # somehow
>> been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # > theory # >
>> including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue making #
>> > your # > untenable k'lame.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China"
>> plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or
>> "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there were both.
>> I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add here, other than to
>> # > reiterate that #
>> # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying to
>> # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or you're stark raving #
>> > bonkers.
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back # >
>> then.
>> # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a different #
>> > sock... # >
>> # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on "stark
>> # > raving # > # > bonkers"
>> # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012. 
>> You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on
>> fire.
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over again in
>> the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20 on the hit die
>> while # > someone,
>> # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
>> # > # >
>> # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
>> # > #
>> # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>> # >
>> # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts in late #
>> > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey rode in
>> on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid "Tetrarchy" idea to
>> take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had either already destroyed, or
>> was in the # > process of destroying.  It doesn't change the fact that
>> the "Tetrarchy" # > blew up in your face, and over six years later,
>> you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and resurrecting
>> that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny that, but everyone
>> knows better.
>> #
>> # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was* active in #
>> 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history, such as my two-year #
>> stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>> 
>> Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe it
>> better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you flailed around
>> miserably, until you finally tried to give away
>> That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied
>> Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.  Then,
>> your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even
>> attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is, you
>> failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because you're one
>> of the biggest Ko0ks here.
>> 
>> Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other K0oks,
>> but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my your
>> often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom you declared
>> was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you claim to be a
>> Ko0kologist,
>> given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden
>> variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>
>Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>
><snicker>

https://www.whychristmas.com/customs/whenchristmasiscelebrated.shtml

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723643

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36a9a007602c4756996003@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723627
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > 
# > #
# > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > #
# > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
# > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
# > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # >
# > # >
# > # > #
# > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > #
# > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
# > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>,
# > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # >
# > # > # >
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > snowflakes,
# > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
# > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
# > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
# > says...
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
# > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
# > says...
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate
# > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
# > when #
# > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
# > # >
# > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings
# > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
# > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns,
# > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
# > Melt,
# > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
# > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate
# > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a
# > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
# > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really been that
# > # > long?
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine.
# > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your interlocutor in
# > the third # > person # > rather # > than the # > second?
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked
# > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
# > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".  That
# > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or three months,
# > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # > happen.
# > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in
# > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi
# > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012) have # somehow
# > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # > theory # >
# > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue making #
# > > your # > untenable k'lame.
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too.
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China"
# > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
# > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or
# > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there were both.
# > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add here, other than to
# > # > reiterate that #
# > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying to
# > # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or you're stark raving #
# > > bonkers.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back # >
# > then.
# > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a different #
# > > sock... # >
# > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on "stark
# > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
# > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012. 
# > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on
# > fire.
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over again in
# > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20 on the hit die
# > while # > someone,
# > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
# > # > # >
# > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
# > # > #
# > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
# > # >
# > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts in late #
# > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey rode in
# > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid "Tetrarchy" idea to
# > take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had either already destroyed, or
# > was in the # > process of destroying.  It doesn't change the fact that
# > the "Tetrarchy" # > blew up in your face, and over six years later,
# > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and resurrecting
# > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny that, but everyone
# > knows better.
# > #
# > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was* active in #
# > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history, such as my two-year #
# > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
# > 
# > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe it
# > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you flailed around
# > miserably, until you finally tried to give away
# > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied
# > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.  Then,
# > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even
# > attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is, you
# > failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because you're one
# > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
# > 
# > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other K0oks,
# > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my your
# > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom you declared
# > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you claim to be a
# > Ko0kologist,
# > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden
# > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
# 
# Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
# 
# <snicker>

Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by the 
facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723650

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
Message-ID<q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723643
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> #
> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> #
> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> # >
> # >
> # > #
> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > #
> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
> nad318b404 #
> # > > @gmail.invalid says...
> # > # >
> # > # >
> # > # > #
> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> snowflakes,
> # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > #
> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
> <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
> says...
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
> says...
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate
> wrote:
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
> when #
> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
> # >
> # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
> Melt,
> # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800,
> Checkmate # > wrote:
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
> goggles # > when #
> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
> @gmail.invalid # > # >
> # > # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings
> # > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns,
> # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
> again. # > Melt,
> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate
> # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym
> until a # > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really been
> that # > # > long?
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine.
> # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your
> interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # > than the # >
> second?
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I
> spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".  That
> # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or three
> months,
> # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # >
> happen.
> # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in #
> > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi
> # > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012) have #
> somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # >
> theory # >
> # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue
> making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily
> too.
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China"
> # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or #
> > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there were
> both. # > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add here,
> other than to # > # > reiterate that #
> # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying
> to # > # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or you're stark
> raving #
> # > > bonkers.
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back #
> > # > then.
> # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a
> different # # > > sock... # >
> # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on
> "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
> # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012.
> # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on
> # > fire.
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over again
> in # > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20 on the hit
> die # > while # > someone,
> # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
> # > # > #
> # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
> # > # >
> # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts in
> late #
> # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey rode
> in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid "Tetrarchy" idea
> to # > take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had either already
> destroyed, or # > was in the # > process of destroying.  It doesn't
> change the fact that # > the "Tetrarchy" # > blew up in your face, and
> over six years later,
> # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and
> resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny
> that, but everyone # > knows better.
> # > #
> # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was* active in
> # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history, such as my
> two-year #
> # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
> # >
> # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe it
> # > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you flailed
> around # > miserably, until you finally tried to give away # >
> That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied # >
> Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.  Then,
> # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even # >
> attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is, you # >
> failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because you're one
> # > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
> # >
> # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other
> K0oks,
> # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my your
> # > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom you
> declared # > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you claim to
> be a # > Ko0kologist,
> # > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden # >
> variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
> #
> # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
> #
> # <snicker>
> 
> Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by the
> facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."

... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of frothy vitriol 
in response to one teensy little Message-ID that just so happens to have 
proved you wrong.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723660

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36a9c1ccde982d7d996008@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723650
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > 
# > #
# > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > #
# > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
# > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
# > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # >
# > # >
# > # > #
# > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > #
# > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
# > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
# > nad318b404 #
# > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # >
# > # > # >
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > snowflakes,
# > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
# > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
# > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
# > says...
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
# > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
# > says...
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate
# > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
# > when #
# > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
# > # >
# > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
# > Melt,
# > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800,
# > Checkmate # > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
# > goggles # > when #
# > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
# > @gmail.invalid # > # >
# > # > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings
# > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns,
# > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
# > again. # > Melt,
# > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate
# > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym
# > until a # > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really been
# > that # > # > long?
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine.
# > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your
# > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # > than the # >
# > second?
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I
# > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".  That
# > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or three
# > months,
# > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # >
# > happen.
# > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in #
# > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi
# > # > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012) have #
# > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # >
# > theory # >
# > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue
# > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily
# > too.
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China"
# > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or #
# > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there were
# > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add here,
# > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
# > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying
# > to # > # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or you're stark
# > raving #
# > # > > bonkers.
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back #
# > > # > then.
# > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a
# > different # # > > sock... # >
# > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on
# > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
# > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012.
# > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on
# > # > fire.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over again
# > in # > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20 on the hit
# > die # > while # > someone,
# > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
# > # > # >
# > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts in
# > late #
# > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey rode
# > in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid "Tetrarchy" idea
# > to # > take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had either already
# > destroyed, or # > was in the # > process of destroying.  It doesn't
# > change the fact that # > the "Tetrarchy" # > blew up in your face, and
# > over six years later,
# > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and
# > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny
# > that, but everyone # > knows better.
# > # > #
# > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was* active in
# > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history, such as my
# > two-year #
# > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
# > # >
# > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe it
# > # > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you flailed
# > around # > miserably, until you finally tried to give away # >
# > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied # >
# > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.  Then,
# > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even # >
# > attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is, you # >
# > failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because you're one
# > # > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
# > # >
# > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other
# > K0oks,
# > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my your
# > # > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom you
# > declared # > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you claim to
# > be a # > Ko0kologist,
# > # > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden # >
# > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
# > #
# > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
# > #
# > # <snicker>
# > 
# > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by the
# > facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."
# 
# ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of frothy vitriol 
# in response to one teensy little Message-ID that just so happens to have 
# proved you wrong.
# 
# <snicker>

All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your botched attempt to 
run things around here for longer than I thought.  Has it really been 
over six fucking years?  That really IS pathetic...

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723713

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
Message-ID<q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723660
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> #
> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> #
> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
> > @gmail.invalid says...
> # >
> # >
> # > #
> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > #
> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
> nad318b404 #
> # > > @gmail.invalid says...
> # > # >
> # > # >
> # > # > #
> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> snowflakes,
> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > #
> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
> <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
> # > nad318b404 #
> # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
> says...
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate
> wrote:
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
> when #
> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
> # >
> # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
> Melt,
> # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800,
> Checkmate # > wrote:
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
> goggles # > when #
> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
> @gmail.invalid # > # >
> # > # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
> again. # > Melt,
> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800,
> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety #
> > goggles # > when #
> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
> # > # > # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help
> buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
> talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
> # > again. # > Melt,
> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800,
> Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym
> # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really
> been # > that # > # > long?
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not
> mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your #
> > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # > than the # >
> # > second?
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I
> # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi". 
> That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or
> three # > months,
> # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # >
> # > happen.
> # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads
> in #
> # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of
> kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012)
> have #
> # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # >
> # > theory # >
> # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue #
> > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily
> # > too.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in
> China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads"
> or #
> # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there
> were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add
> here,
> # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
> # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally
> lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or
> you're stark # > raving #
> # > # > > bonkers.
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC
> back #
> # > > # > then.
> # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a # >
> different # # > > sock... # >
> # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money
> on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
> # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in
> 2012.
> # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants
> on # > # > fire.
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over
> again # > in # > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20
> on the hit # > die # > while # > someone,
> # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts
> in # > late #
> # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey
> rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid
> "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had
> either already # > destroyed, or # > was in the # > process of
> destroying.  It doesn't # > change the fact that # > the "Tetrarchy" # >
> blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
> # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and # >
> resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny # >
> that, but everyone # > knows better.
> # > # > #
> # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was*
> active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history,
> such as my # > two-year #
> # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
> # > # >
> # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe
> it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you
> flailed # > around # > miserably, until you finally tried to give away #
> >
> # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied #
> > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE. 
> Then,
> # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even
> # > # > attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is,
> you # > # > failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because
> you're one # > # > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
> # > # >
> # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other #
> > K0oks,
> # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my
> your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom
> you # > declared # > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you
> claim to # > be a # > Ko0kologist,
> # > # > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden
> # >
> # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
> # > #
> # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
> # > #
> # > # <snicker>
> # >
> # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by the
> # > facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."
> #
> # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of frothy
> vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that just so
> happens to have # proved you wrong.
> #
> # <snicker>
> 
> All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your botched attempt to
> run things around here for longer than I thought.  Has it really been
> over six fucking years?  That really IS pathetic...

Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to convince 
yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy McMarionette ... 
your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723716

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
Message-ID<btnl8o.fit.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#723713
On 2019-01-17 3:23 p.m., Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> 
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>> @gmail.invalid says...
>>
>>
>> #
>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> #
>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
>>> @gmail.invalid says...
>> # >
>> # >
>> # > #
>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > #
>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
>> nad318b404 #
>> # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # >
>> # > # >
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> snowflakes,
>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
>> <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
>> # > nad318b404 #
>> # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
>> says...
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>> # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate
>> wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
>> when #
>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
>> # >
>> # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
>> Melt,
>> # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800,
>> Checkmate # > wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
>> goggles # > when #
>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>> @gmail.invalid # > # >
>> # > # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>> again. # > Melt,
>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800,
>> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety #
>>> goggles # > when #
>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
>> # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
>> # > # > # > says...
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help
>> buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
>> talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
>> # > again. # > Melt,
>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800,
>> Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym
>> # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really
>> been # > that # > # > long?
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not
>> mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your #
>>> interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # > than the # >
>> # > second?
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I
>> # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi".
>> That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or
>> three # > months,
>> # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # >
>> # > happen.
>> # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads
>> in #
>> # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of
>> kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012)
>> have #
>> # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # >
>> # > theory # >
>> # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue #
>>> making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily
>> # > too.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in
>> China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads"
>> or #
>> # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there
>> were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add
>> here,
>> # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
>> # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally
>> lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or
>> you're stark # > raving #
>> # > # > > bonkers.
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC
>> back #
>> # > > # > then.
>> # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a # >
>> different # # > > sock... # >
>> # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money
>> on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
>> # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
>> # > # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
>> # > # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in
>> 2012.
>> # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants
>> on # > # > fire.
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over
>> again # > in # > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20
>> on the hit # > die # > while # > someone,
>> # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
>> # > # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
>> # > # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
>> # > # > # > #
>> # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
>> # > # > # >
>> # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts
>> in # > late #
>> # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey
>> rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid
>> "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had
>> either already # > destroyed, or # > was in the # > process of
>> destroying.  It doesn't # > change the fact that # > the "Tetrarchy" # >
>> blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
>> # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and # >
>> resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny # >
>> that, but everyone # > knows better.
>> # > # > #
>> # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was*
>> active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history,
>> such as my # > two-year #
>> # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
>> # > # >
>> # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe
>> it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you
>> flailed # > around # > miserably, until you finally tried to give away #
>>>
>> # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied #
>>> # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.
>> Then,
>> # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even
>> # > # > attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is,
>> you # > # > failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because
>> you're one # > # > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
>> # > # >
>> # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other #
>>> K0oks,
>> # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my
>> your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom
>> you # > declared # > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you
>> claim to # > be a # > Ko0kologist,
>> # > # > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden
>> # >
>> # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
>> # > #
>> # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
>> # > #
>> # > # <snicker>
>> # >
>> # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by the
>> # > facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."
>> #
>> # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of frothy
>> vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that just so
>> happens to have # proved you wrong.
>> #
>> # <snicker>
>>
>> All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your botched attempt to
>> run things around here for longer than I thought.  Has it really been
>> over six fucking years?  That really IS pathetic...
> 
> Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to convince
> yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy McMarionette ...
> your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
> 
> <snicker>
> 

poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky ,
poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky , poof kooky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723746

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36aadea8edc17a83996025@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723713
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > 
# > #
# > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > #
# > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
# > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 #
# > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # >
# > # >
# > # > #
# > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > #
# > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
# > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
# > nad318b404 #
# > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # >
# > # > # >
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > snowflakes,
# > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
# > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
# > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
# > # > nad318b404 #
# > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
# > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid # >
# > says...
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800, Checkmate
# > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
# > when #
# > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
# > # >
# > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
# > Melt,
# > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800,
# > Checkmate # > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
# > goggles # > when #
# > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
# > @gmail.invalid # > # >
# > # > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
# > again. # > Melt,
# > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800,
# > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety #
# > > goggles # > when #
# > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
# > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
# > # > # > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help
# > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
# > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
# > # > again. # > Melt,
# > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800,
# > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym
# > # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it really
# > been # > that # > # > long?
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not
# > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer # to your #
# > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # > than the # >
# > # > second?
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I
# > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi". 
# > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or
# > three # > months,
# > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it # >
# > # > happen.
# > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads
# > in #
# > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to of
# > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # > 2012)
# > have #
# > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy # >
# > # > theory # >
# > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to continue #
# > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily
# > # > too.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in
# > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads"
# > or #
# > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there
# > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can add
# > here,
# > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
# > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally
# > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > historical # revisionism, or
# > you're stark # > raving #
# > # > # > > bonkers.
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in AC
# > back #
# > # > > # > then.
# > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a # >
# > different # # > > sock... # >
# > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money
# > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
# > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in
# > 2012.
# > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your pants
# > on # > # > fire.
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and over
# > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a natural 20
# > on the hit # > die # > while # > someone,
# > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two posts
# > in # > late #
# > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse Fakey
# > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that stupid
# > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take over # > the Ko0k Awards, which I had
# > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in the # > process of
# > destroying.  It doesn't # > change the fact that # > the "Tetrarchy" # >
# > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
# > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and # >
# > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny # >
# > that, but everyone # > knows better.
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was*
# > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent history,
# > such as my # > two-year #
# > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
# > # > # >
# > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would describe
# > it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it, and you
# > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you finally tried to give away #
# > >
# > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different bonafied #
# > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE. 
# > Then,
# > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom even
# > # > # > attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The fact is,
# > you # > # > failed on all accounts.  You could never be an FNVW, because
# > you're one # > # > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
# > # > # >
# > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the other #
# > > K0oks,
# > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced my
# > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh (whom
# > you # > declared # > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact that you
# > claim to # > be a # > Ko0kologist,
# > # > # > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a garden
# > # >
# > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
# > # > #
# > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
# > # > #
# > # > # <snicker>
# > # >
# > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by the
# > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."
# > #
# > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of frothy
# > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that just so
# > happens to have # proved you wrong.
# > #
# > # <snicker>
# > 
# > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your botched attempt to
# > run things around here for longer than I thought.  Has it really been
# > over six fucking years?  That really IS pathetic...
# 
# Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to convince 
# yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy McMarionette ... 
# your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
# 
# <snicker>

The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried it, and it's 
not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and ask if you may please 
have another.

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723765

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
Message-ID<q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>
In reply to#723746
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> #
> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> #
> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> # > @gmail.invalid says...
> # >
> # >
> # > #
> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > #
> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
> nad318b404 #
> # > > @gmail.invalid says...
> # > # >
> # > # >
> # > # > #
> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> snowflakes,
> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > #
> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
> <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
> # > nad318b404 #
> # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
> # > # > nad318b404 #
> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate
> wrote:
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
> when #
> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
> # >
> # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
> Melt,
> # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800,
> Checkmate # > wrote:
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
> goggles # > when #
> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
> @gmail.invalid # > # >
> # > # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
> again. # > Melt,
> # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800,
> # > Checkmate # > wrote:
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety #
> > goggles # > when #
> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
> # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
> # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
> # > # > # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
> # > again. # > Melt,
> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800,
> # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
> safety # # > > goggles # > when #
> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article #
> >
> # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
> # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
> # > # > # > # > says...
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help #
> > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
> # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800,
> # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads
> nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it
> really # > been # > that # > # > long?
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem,
> not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer #
> to your #
> # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # > than the #
> > # > # > second?
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda"
> when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as
> "Kensi".
> # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or
> # > three # > months,
> # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it #
> >
> # > # > happen.
> # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole
> threads # > in #
> # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to
> of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # >
> 2012)
> # > have #
> # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy #
> > # > # > theory # >
> # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to
> continue #
> # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very
> kookily # > # > too.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in
> # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no
> "Nads" # > or #
> # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there
> # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can
> add # > here,
> # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
> # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're
> intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > historical #
> revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
> # > # > # > > bonkers.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in
> AC # > back #
> # > # > > # > then.
> # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a
> # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
> # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my
> money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
> # > # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda"
> in # > 2012.
> # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your
> pants # > on # > # > fire.
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and
> over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a
> natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # > while # > someone,
> # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
> # > # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
> # > # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
> # > # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
> # > # > # > # >
> # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two
> posts # > in # > late #
> # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse
> Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that
> stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take over # > the Ko0k Awards,
> which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in the # >
> process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # > change the fact that # > the
> "Tetrarchy" # >
> # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
> # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and #
> >
> # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny
> # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better.
> # > # > # > #
> # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was*
> # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent
> history, # > such as my # > two-year #
> # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would
> describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it,
> and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you finally tried to
> give away #
> # > >
> # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different
> bonafied #
> # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.
> # > Then,
> # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom
> even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The
> fact is, # > you # > # > failed on all accounts.  You could never be an
> FNVW, because # > you're one # > # > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
> # > # > # >
> # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the
> other #
> # > > K0oks,
> # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced
> my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh
> (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact
> that you # > claim to # > be a # > Ko0kologist,
> # > # > # > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a
> garden # > # >
> # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
> # > # > #
> # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
> # > # > #
> # > # > # <snicker>
> # > # >
> # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by
> the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."
> # > #
> # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of frothy #
> > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that just so # >
> happens to have # proved you wrong.
> # > #
> # > # <snicker>
> # >
> # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your botched
> attempt to # > run things around here for longer than I thought.  Has it
> really been # > over six fucking years?  That really IS pathetic...
> #
> # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to convince #
> yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy McMarionette
> ...
> # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
> #
> # <snicker>
> 
> The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried it, and it's
> not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and ask if you may please
> have another.

Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's really going on:

> Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
> dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
> dance dance.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop:
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#723767

FromCheckmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.36aaf3a54214ad7996042@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#723765
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


# 
# Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
# On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# 
# > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
# > Checkmate!  In article <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > @gmail.invalid says...
# > 
# > 
# > #
# > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > #
# > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
# > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
# > # > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # >
# > # >
# > # > #
# > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
# > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > #
# > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
# > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>,
# > nad318b404 #
# > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # >
# > # > # >
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > snowflakes,
# > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when
# > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article
# > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>,
# > # > nad318b404 #
# > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when #
# > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>,
# > # > # > nad318b404 #
# > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says...
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
# > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, Checkmate
# > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles
# > when #
# > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid
# > # >
# > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again.
# > Melt,
# > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 -0800,
# > Checkmate # > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety
# > goggles # > when #
# > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
# > @gmail.invalid # > # >
# > # > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
# > again. # > Melt,
# > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800,
# > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety #
# > > goggles # > when #
# > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article # >
# > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
# > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
# > # > # > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes
# > # > again. # > Melt,
# > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800,
# > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote:
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved
# > safety # # > > goggles # > when #
# > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate!  In article #
# > >
# > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >
# > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > says...
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help #
# > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > climate # > # > change #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics,
# > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing
# > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt!
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800,
# > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads
# > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months # > after # > I #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK.  Has it
# > really # > been # > that # > # > long?
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem,
# > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # > refer #
# > to your #
# > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # > than the #
# > > # > # > second?
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda"
# > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody posting as
# > "Kensi".
# > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # > for two or
# > # > three # > months,
# > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > who made it #
# > >
# > # > # > happen.
# > # > # > # > HINT:  It # > wasn't you.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole
# > threads # > in #
# > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I linked to
# > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # > silly back # > in # >
# > 2012)
# > # > have #
# > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge conspiracy #
# > > # > # > theory # >
# > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > want to
# > continue #
# > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very
# > kookily # > # > too.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit.  I received my HoT in 2012,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in
# > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that there was no
# > "Nads" # > or #
# > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that time,
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that proves there
# > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > don't # see what else I can
# > add # > here,
# > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that #
# > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're
# > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > historical #
# > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving #
# > # > # > # > > bonkers.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting at all in
# > AC # > back #
# > # > # > > # > then.
# > # > # > # > # >  If # > you # > were around back then, you were using a
# > # > # > different # # > > sock... # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that sock was?
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my
# > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > bonkers"
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation.
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda"
# > in # > 2012.
# > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, with your
# > pants # > on # > # > fire.
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie over and
# > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of # eventually getting a
# > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # > while # > someone,
# > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 on their saving throw?
# > # > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I suppose ...
# > # > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in 2012...
# > # > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me>
# > # > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of about two
# > posts # > in # > late #
# > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the same horse
# > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you buffoons got that
# > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > take over # > the Ko0k Awards,
# > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in the # >
# > process of # > destroying.  It doesn't # > change the fact that # > the
# > "Tetrarchy" # >
# > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later,
# > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an FNVW and #
# > >
# > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed.  Of # > course you'll deny
# > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better.
# > # > # > # > #
# > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you admit I *was*
# > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt to erase more recent
# > history, # > such as my # > two-year #
# > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017.
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps "stunt" would
# > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic fail.  No one sanctioned it,
# > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you finally tried to
# > give away #
# > # > >
# > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three different
# > bonafied #
# > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do with TWNE.
# > # > Then,
# > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, and seldom
# > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except very sporadically.  The
# > fact is, # > you # > # > failed on all accounts.  You could never be an
# > FNVW, because # > you're one # > # > of the biggest Ko0ks here.
# > # > # > # >
# > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than most of the
# > other #
# > # > > K0oks,
# > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, as evidenced
# > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings about Trump, Kavanaugh
# > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist), etc, etc.  The very fact
# > that you # > claim to # > be a # > Ko0kologist,
# > # > # > # > given your track record, proves that you're nothing but a
# > garden # > # >
# > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself.
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt!
# > # > # > #
# > # > # > # <snicker>
# > # > # >
# > # > # > Translation:  "I've just been totally spanked and humiliated by
# > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my defense."
# > # > #
# > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines of frothy #
# > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that just so # >
# > happens to have # proved you wrong.
# > # > #
# > # > # <snicker>
# > # >
# > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your botched
# > attempt to # > run things around here for longer than I thought.  Has it
# > really been # > over six fucking years?  That really IS pathetic...
# > #
# > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying to convince #
# > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy McMarionette
# > ...
# > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress.
# > #
# > # <snicker>
# > 
# > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried it, and it's
# > not working now.  Thank me for your spanking, and ask if you may please
# > have another.
# 
# Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's really going on:
# 
# > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
# > dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance
# > dance dance.
# 
# <snicker>

Empty quiver again?

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web