Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #721880 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 249 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 03:52 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-03 22:30 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 09:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 10:24 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 13:56 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 12:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-04 18:12 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-05 11:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-05 13:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 09:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-09 10:33 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:18 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-09 23:24 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 10:59 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:22 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:02 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 00:25 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:54 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000
NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-15 02:28 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 20:58 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-15 00:03 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 23:52 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 04:04 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:38 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:41 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:45 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 14:53 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:57 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 15:05 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-16 20:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-16 18:40 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 19:02 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 06:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 23:28 -0800
Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 22:09 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 15:22 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:27 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:20 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:32 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:40 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:46 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 22:26 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 15:11 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 00:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 18:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:58 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:53 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:57 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:44 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:25 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:44 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:53 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 17:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 20:58 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 21:00 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-20 09:17 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700
Nadegda can't handle the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800
Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:12 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-10 15:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:03 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 19:26 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:57 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-01-20 07:29 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-01 16:07 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-01 10:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 09:38 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 11:49 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:37 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:41 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:06 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-01 12:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-17 20:23 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 00:13 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a384ebc5a52842995f69@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723131 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q1ca0m$gdu$14@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 00:25:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by # > Checkmate! In article <q1c6tn$gdu$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says... # > # > # > # # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, # > melt! # On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:22:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # > # # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article <q16kid$jer$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says... # > # > # > # > # > # > # The kookologists. Libtard, kensi, myself, and whoever else is left # > of # > the # old guard. # > # > # # > # > # > # > "Old Guard"? You and the rest of your sock entourage # # > # Proof, kooky? # > # # > # > only crawled out of the woodwork after I spanked Burnore out of AUK. # > # # > # Wrong. I've been active here since 2012 and kensi for even longer. # > Check # google's archives if you don't believe me. # > # > PPPOSTFU... # # What's the third "P" stand for? I've not seen that variation before. That stands for "Please". I'm not as rude as these other assholes. # Oh, and: # # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me> A bogus email addy anyone could have used. Also, I don't recall anyone actively using AC back in 2012. I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? # <k3tpcp$the$1@speranza.aioe.org> Again, a bogus email addy anyone could have used, posted to the Flonk. # SPNAK!x2 "Evidence" is not admissible. # And an additional echoing SPNAK! because the snicker at the end of the # latter post was at your expense. Snickerdoodles have no power over me, Ko0k. # <snicker> # # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce back, # and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I miss kensi, # physics questions like that are right up her alley.) I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723134 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I > spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? > # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce > # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I miss > # kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) > > I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: > # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with > # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. Looks like "some kook" is you. SPNAK! <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000 |
| Subject | NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <q1dt58$geb$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723208 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I >> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? > > Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer > to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? > >> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce >> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I >> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) >> >> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... > > And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: > >> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with >> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. > > Looks like "some kook" is you. > > SPNAK! > > <snicker> This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, to amend to add more should the need arise. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <btajkc.tks.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #723213 |
On 2019-01-12 4:27 p.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I >>> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? >> >> Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer >> to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? >> >>> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce >>> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I >>> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) >>> >>> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... >> >> And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: >> >>> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with >>> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. >> >> Looks like "some kook" is you. >> >> SPNAK! >> >> <snicker> > > This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. > > NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat > Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, > to amend to add more should the need arise. > > <snicker> > try licking your lips and sticking yourself to the wall , frenchie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <cm0l3etkc3dveo98rb46rdqig7poi20ijj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #723213 |
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:27:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I >>> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? >> >> Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer >> to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? >> >>> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce >>> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I >>> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) >>> >>> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... >> >> And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: >> >>> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with >>> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. >> >> Looks like "some kook" is you. >> >> SPNAK! >> >> <snicker> > >This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. > >NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat >Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, >to amend to add more should the need arise. > ><snicker> Wrong. Your headers read as follows respecting your little trap: >Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with some > sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. I did nothing other than LOL and say IAWTP. I did NOT respond to your statement with sexual innuendo/harassment. All I did was laugh and agree with another (PeeScent). So I didn't directly respond to your statement so, consequently, I am not eligible for some stupid award. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregรธry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a4440656719cc2995f8e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723217 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <cm0l3etkc3dveo98rb46rdqig7poi20ijj@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... # # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:27:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: # # >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # >On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: # > # >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # >> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # >> # >>> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I # >>> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? # >> # >> Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer # >> to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? # >> # >>> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce # >>> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I # >>> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) # >>> # >>> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... # >> # >> And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: # >> # >>> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with # >>> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. # >> # >> Looks like "some kook" is you. # >> # >> SPNAK! # >> # >> <snicker> # > # >This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. # > # >NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat # >Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, # >to amend to add more should the need arise. # > # ><snicker> # # Wrong. Your headers read as follows respecting your little trap: # >Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with some # > sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. # # I did nothing other than LOL and say IAWTP. # I did NOT respond to your statement with sexual # innuendo/harassment. All I did was laugh and agree # with another (PeeScent). So I didn't directly respond # to your statement so, consequently, I am not eligible # for some stupid award. It's a moot argument, because there ARE no awards in any of the included groups. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <q1f5de$hv0$2@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #723217 |
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:17:09 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:27:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I >>>> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? >>> >>> Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually >>> refer to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? >>> >>>> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce # >>>> back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I # >>>> miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) >>>> >>>> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... >>> >>> And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: >>> >>>> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with >>>> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. >>> >>> Looks like "some kook" is you. >>> >>> SPNAK! >>> >>> <snicker> >> >>This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. >> >>NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob >>Allisat Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it >>please the FNVW, >>to amend to add more should the need arise. >> >><snicker> > > Wrong. Your headers read as follows respecting your little trap: >>Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with some >> sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. > > I did nothing other than LOL and say IAWTP. > I did NOT respond to your statement with sexual innuendo/harassment. All > I did was laugh and agree with another (PeeScent). So I didn't directly > respond to your statement so, consequently, I am not eligible for some > stupid award. If I had a penny for every time some kook tried to argue his way out of a kook award by claiming ineligibility, I'd be the guy sitting behind the Resolute Desk right now instead of that Donald loon. You're on the ballot for January's Allisat and there's nothing you can do about it but cry, kook. But please do so anyway. It amuses the Vote Wrangler and your two Usenet Ladies and Mistresses when you do. -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <q1no67$350$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #723246 |
On 1/13/2019 4:54 AM, Libtard wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:17:09 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:27:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I >>>>> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? >>>> >>>> Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually >>>> refer to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? >>>> >>>>> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce # >>>>> back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I # >>>>> miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) >>>>> >>>>> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... >>>> >>>> And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: >>>> >>>>> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with >>>>> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. >>>> >>>> Looks like "some kook" is you. >>>> >>>> SPNAK! >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> >>> This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. >>> >>> NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob >>> Allisat Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it >>> please the FNVW, >>> to amend to add more should the need arise. >>> >>> <snicker> >> >> Wrong. Your headers read as follows respecting your little trap: >>> Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with some >>> sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. >> >> I did nothing other than LOL and say IAWTP. >> I did NOT respond to your statement with sexual innuendo/harassment. All >> I did was laugh and agree with another (PeeScent). So I didn't directly >> respond to your statement so, consequently, I am not eligible for some >> stupid award. > > If I had a penny for every time some kook tried to argue his way out of a > kook award by claiming ineligibility, I'd be the guy sitting behind the > Resolute Desk right now instead of that Donald loon. > > You're on the ballot for January's Allisat and there's nothing you can do > about it but cry, kook. But please do so anyway. It amuses the Vote > Wrangler and your two Usenet Ladies and Mistresses when you do. > Dude, your mind is totally f*cked, too many socks, now why do you want it right up your ally? (Hint: Hillary says, "it depends upon the meaning what "it" is.")
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <-fKdnV4f-vXT-aLBnZ2dnUU7-fPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #723574 |
On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:03:41 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <q1no67$350$1@gioia.aioe.org>: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On 1/13/2019 4:54 AM, Libtard wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:17:09 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:27:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, ๐ฉ wrote: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce # โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I # โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) I'm โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with # โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Looks like "some kook" is you. SPNAK! <๐ฉsnickerTurd๐ฉ> โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. NOMINATION: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ๐ฉ, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat Memorial โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, to โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก amend to add more should the need arise. <๐ฉsnickerTurd๐ฉ> โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Wrong. Your headers read as follows respecting your little trap: โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with some โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก I did nothing other than LOL and say IAWTP. I did NOT respond to your โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก statement with sexual innuendo/harassment. All I did was laugh and โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก agree with another (PeeScent). So I didn't directly respond to your โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก statement so, consequently, I am not eligible for some stupid award. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก If I had a penny for every time some kook tried to argue his way out of โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก a kook award by claiming ineligibility, I'd be the guy sitting behind โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก the Resolute Desk right now instead of that Donald loon. You're on the โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ballot for January's Allisat and there's nothing you can do about it but โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก cry, kook. But please do so anyway. It amuses the Vote Wrangler and โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก your two Usenet Ladies and Mistresses when you do. โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Dude, your mind is totally f*cked, too many socks, now why do you want โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก it right up your ally? โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก (Hint: Hillary says, "it depends upon the meaning what "it" is.") โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก i bet you and checkmate share a killfile together. how cute. -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECKยฎ VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <q1nro2$ii2$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #723575 |
On 1/16/2019 11:05 AM, Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner ๐ถ็ฌ wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:03:41 -0600, LO AND BEHOLD; Sergio > <invalid@invalid.com> determined that the following was of great > importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in > <q1no67$350$1@gioia.aioe.org>: > > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On 1/13/2019 4:54 AM, Libtard wrote: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 19:17:09 -0500, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:27:37 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, ๐ฉ wrote: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce # > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I # > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) I'm > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with # > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Looks like "some kook" is you. SPNAK! <๐ฉsnickerTurd๐ฉ> > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. NOMINATION: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ๐ฉ, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat Memorial > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, to > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก amend to add more should the need arise. <๐ฉsnickerTurd๐ฉ> > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Wrong. Your headers read as follows respecting your little trap: > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with some > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก I did nothing other than LOL and say IAWTP. I did NOT respond to your > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก statement with sexual innuendo/harassment. All I did was laugh and > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก agree with another (PeeScent). So I didn't directly respond to your > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก statement so, consequently, I am not eligible for some stupid award. > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก If I had a penny for every time some kook tried to argue his way out of > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก a kook award by claiming ineligibility, I'd be the guy sitting behind > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก the Resolute Desk right now instead of that Donald loon. You're on the > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก ballot for January's Allisat and there's nothing you can do about it but > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก cry, kook. But please do so anyway. It amuses the Vote Wrangler and > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก your two Usenet Ladies and Mistresses when you do. > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Dude, your mind is totally f*cked, too many socks, now why do you want > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก it right up your ally? > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก (Hint: Hillary says, "it depends upon the meaning what "it" is.") > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก > > i bet you and checkmate share a killfile together. > > how cute. > โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก Dude, your mind is totally f*cked, too many socks, now why do you want it right up your ally? (Hint: Hillary says, "it depends upon the meaning what "it" is.") โกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโกโก
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a448a7333daf74995f94@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723213 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q1dt58$geb$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: # # > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # > # >> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I # >> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? # > # > Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer # > to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? # > # >> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce # >> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I # >> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) # >> # >> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... # > # > And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: # > # >> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with # >> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. # > # > Looks like "some kook" is you. # > # > SPNAK! # > # > <snicker> # # This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. # # NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat # Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, # to amend to add more should the need arise. # # <snicker> Yet you're the only K0ok here, who imagines that there are any "awards" in any of the three groups you posted this to... ko0ok! -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <btav4h.mso.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #723229 |
On 2019-01-12 7:56 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q1dt58$geb$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > # > # > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > # > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > # > > # >> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I > # >> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? > # > > # > Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer > # > to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? > # > > # >> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce > # >> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I > # >> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) > # >> > # >> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... > # > > # > And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: > # > > # >> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with > # >> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. > # > > # > Looks like "some kook" is you. > # > > # > SPNAK! > # > > # > <snicker> > # > # This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. > # > # NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat > # Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, > # to amend to add more should the need arise. > # > # <snicker> > > Yet you're the only K0ok here, who imagines that there are any "awards" > in any of the three groups you posted this to... ko0ok! > good thing i can veto posts too
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a47c4d153339e3995fa4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723230 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <btav4h.mso.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... # # On 2019-01-12 7:56 p.m., Checkmate wrote: # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by # > Checkmate! In article <q1dt58$geb$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says... # > # > # > # # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: # > # # > # > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # > # > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # > # > # > # >> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I # > # >> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? # > # > # > # > Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer # > # > to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? # > # > # > # >> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce # > # >> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I # > # >> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) # > # >> # > # >> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... # > # > # > # > And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: # > # > # > # >> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with # > # >> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. # > # > # > # > Looks like "some kook" is you. # > # > # > # > SPNAK! # > # > # > # > <snicker> # > # # > # This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. # > # # > # NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat # > # Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, # > # to amend to add more should the need arise. # > # # > # <snicker> # > # > Yet you're the only K0ok here, who imagines that there are any "awards" # > in any of the three groups you posted this to... ko0ok! # > # good thing i can veto posts too No need to, they're already mooted. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <btcbis.tb7.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #723237 |
On 2019-01-12 11:36 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <btav4h.mso.17.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > > # > # On 2019-01-12 7:56 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > # > Checkmate! In article <q1dt58$geb$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > # > @gmail.invalid says... > # > > # > > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > # > # > # > # > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > # > # > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > # > # > > # > # >> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I > # > # >> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? > # > # > > # > # > Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer > # > # > to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? > # > # > > # > # >> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce > # > # >> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I > # > # >> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) > # > # >> > # > # >> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... > # > # > > # > # > And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: > # > # > > # > # >> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" with > # > # >> # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. > # > # > > # > # > Looks like "some kook" is you. > # > # > > # > # > SPNAK! > # > # > > # > # > <snicker> > # > # > # > # This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. > # > # > # > # NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob Allisat > # > # Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it please the FNVW, > # > # to amend to add more should the need arise. > # > # > # > # <snicker> > # > > # > Yet you're the only K0ok here, who imagines that there are any "awards" > # > in any of the three groups you posted this to... ko0ok! > # > > # good thing i can veto posts too > > No need to, they're already mooted. > i guess that's why i didn't
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change |
| Message-ID | <q1f59m$hv0$1@news.mixmin.net> |
| In reply to | #723213 |
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:05:52 -0800, Fidget McFlaherty wrote: > On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 6:27:37 PM UTC-5, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:05:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >> > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> > melt! >> > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> > >> >> I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I >> >> spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? >> > >> > Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually >> > refer to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the >> > second? >> > >> >> # (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce >> >> # back, and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I >> >> # miss kensi physics questions like that are right up her alley.) >> >> >> >> I'm what's right up her alley, K0ok... IYKWIM... >> > >> > And the trap is sprung! Read the headers of my previous post: >> > >> >> # Summary: Some kook is going to respond to "right up her alley" >> >> with # some sort of sexual innuendo/harassment. Mark my words. >> > >> > Looks like "some kook" is you. >> > >> > SPNAK! >> > >> > <snicker> >> >> This just in: we now have *three* kooks in the trap. >> >> NOMINATION: Checkmate, Zergegglez, and % jointly for January's Bob >> Allisat Memorial "Hook, Line, and Sinker" award, with leave, if it >> please the FNVW, >> to amend to add more should the need arise. > > Seconded! Nomination accepted. Second accepted. The three named kooks will be on the January ballot for the Allisat as a single entity, thus far running unopposed. I'd say "may the best kook win", but it looks like everyone's going to be a winner this time. <smirk> -- Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a44757ac9a4665995f92@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723208 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change # From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate # # # # # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I # > spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? # # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually refer # to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? # There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked Gary out of AUK, nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi". That whole process dragged on for two or three months, and the archives clearly show who made it happen. HINT: It wasn't you. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723228 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually > refer # to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? > # > > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked Gary out of AUK, > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi". That whole process dragged on > for two or three months, and the archives clearly show who made it > happen. HINT: It wasn't you. You're now trying to argue that whole threads in Google's archive (like the one I linked to of kensi and me slapping you silly back in 2012) have somehow been faked. You now need a huge conspiracy theory including a complicit Google if you want to continue making your untenable k'lame. You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too. As I had planned all along. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a55d20e9880d8d995fba@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723269 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by # > Checkmate! In article <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says... # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change # # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate # # > # # > # # > # # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, # > melt! # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # > # # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after I # # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? # > # # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually # > refer # to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the second? # > # # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked Gary out of AUK, # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi". That whole process dragged on # > for two or three months, and the archives clearly show who made it # > happen. HINT: It wasn't you. # # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in Google's archive (like # the one I linked to of kensi and me slapping you silly back in 2012) have # somehow been faked. You now need a huge conspiracy theory including a # complicit Google if you want to continue making your untenable k'lame. # # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too. # # As I had planned all along. # # <snicker> Pure bullshit. I received my HoT in 2012, and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or "Kensi" posting in AUK at that time, and very few people were posting at all in AC back then. If you were around back then, you were using a different sock... care to tell the class what that sock was? -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723276 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > by # > Checkmate! In article <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > # > @gmail.invalid says... > # > > # > > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate > change # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > # > melt! > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after > I # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually > # > refer # to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the > second? > # > # > # > > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked Gary out of > AUK, > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi". That whole process > dragged on # > for two or three months, and the archives clearly show > who made it # > happen. HINT: It wasn't you. > # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in Google's archive > (like # the one I linked to of kensi and me slapping you silly back in > 2012) have # somehow been faked. You now need a huge conspiracy theory > including a # complicit Google if you want to continue making your > untenable k'lame. > # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too. > # > # As I had planned all along. > # > # <snicker> > > Pure bullshit. I received my HoT in 2012, Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China" plastic a HoT? <snicker> > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or "Kensi" posting in > AUK at that time, I already linked to a thread that proves there were both. I really don't see what else I can add here, other than to reiterate that either your memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying to engage in historical revisionism, or you're stark raving bonkers. > and very few people were posting at all in AC back > then. If you were around back then, you were using a different sock... > care to tell the class what that sock was? Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on "stark raving bonkers" as the explanation. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a5a7bd80f03498995fc0@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723285 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by # > Checkmate! In article <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says... # > # > # > # # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:50:32 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # > # # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says... # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate # > change # # > # > From: Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, talk.politics.guns, alt.checkmate # # > # > # # > # > # # > # > # # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, # > # > melt! # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 05:01:02 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # > # > # # > # > # > I also don't recall seeing the Nads nym until a few months after # > I # # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. Has it really been that long? # > # > # # > # > # Your faulty memory is your problem, not mine. Also: do you usually # > # > refer # to your interlocutor in the third person rather than the # > second? # > # > # # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as "Nadegda" when I spanked Gary out of # > AUK, # > # > nor was there anybody posting as "Kensi". That whole process # > dragged on # > for two or three months, and the archives clearly show # > who made it # > happen. HINT: It wasn't you. # > # # > # You're now trying to argue that whole threads in Google's archive # > (like # the one I linked to of kensi and me slapping you silly back in # > 2012) have # somehow been faked. You now need a huge conspiracy theory # > including a # complicit Google if you want to continue making your # > untenable k'lame. # > # # > # You have lost, and you've done it very kookily too. # > # # > # As I had planned all along. # > # # > # <snicker> # > # > Pure bullshit. I received my HoT in 2012, # # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece of "made in China" plastic a HoT? # # <snicker> # # > and I know damned well that there was no "Nads" or "Kensi" posting in # > AUK at that time, # # I already linked to a thread that proves there were both. I really don't # see what else I can add here, other than to reiterate that either your # memory is faulty, you're intentionally lying to engage in historical # revisionism, or you're stark raving bonkers. # # > and very few people were posting at all in AC back # > then. If you were around back then, you were using a different sock... # > care to tell the class what that sock was? # # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting most of my money on "stark raving bonkers" # as the explanation. # # <snicker> You weren't posting here or in AUK as "Nadegda" in 2012. You're a big fat porky-telling liar, with your pants on fire. -- Checkmate ยฎ Copyright ยฉ 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web