Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #721880 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 249 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 03:52 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-03 22:30 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 09:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 10:24 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 13:56 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 12:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-04 18:12 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-05 11:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-05 13:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 09:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-09 10:33 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:18 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-09 23:24 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 10:59 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:22 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:02 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 00:25 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:54 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000
NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-15 02:28 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 20:58 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-15 00:03 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 23:52 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 04:04 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:38 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:41 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:45 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 14:53 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:57 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 15:05 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-16 20:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-16 18:40 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 19:02 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 06:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 23:28 -0800
Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 22:09 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 15:22 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:27 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:20 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:32 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:40 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:46 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 22:26 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 15:11 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 00:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 18:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:58 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:53 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:57 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:44 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:25 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:44 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:53 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 17:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 20:58 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 21:00 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-20 09:17 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700
Nadegda can't handle the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800
Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:12 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-10 15:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:03 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 19:26 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:57 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-01-20 07:29 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-01 16:07 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-01 10:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 09:38 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 11:49 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:37 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:41 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:06 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-01 12:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-17 20:23 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 00:13 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ae46333786b5d0a95@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724091 |
In article <MPG.36adb225dd4b486b99607d@news.altopia.com>, oshay.shad@yahoo.corn says... > >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >Checkmate! In article <MPG.36ad5ce392fceb82a46@news.eternal- >september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says... > > ># ># In article <q20aeh$ptt$27@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid ># says... ># > ># >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ># >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, Skeeter wrote: ># > ># >> In article <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid ># >> says... ># >>> ># >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ># >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten ># >>>Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: ># >>> ># >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda ># >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: ># >>>> ># >>>> <...> ># >>>> ># >>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I ># >>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the ># >>>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. ># >>>> ># >>>> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a ># >>>> single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for ># >>>> almost two years? ># >>> ># >>>You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick ># >>>Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. ># >>>Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to ># >>>expose the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of ># >>>them, e.g. ># >>>Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don ># >>>Jr. ># >>>and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled ># >>>the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case ># >>>do you arrest the big fish at the very top. ># >>> ># >>>Don't you watch crime shows on TV? ># >> ># >> It's obvious you do, but you see this is not a crime family ># > ># >BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ># >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ># >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ># >AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhhhh ># >*gasp* ># > ># >Thank you, I really needed a good belly laugh today. :) ># ># Your snippage of the part that slapped you down is noted, > >It's what she always does... then she'll call YOU a coward. If she really cared about her beliefs are she would leave the content and refute it, instead she runs from it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gahs1rFcsg0U10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #724031 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 23:04:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten >>>Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>> <...> >>>> >>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the >>>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>> >>>> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>>> single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for >>>> almost two years? >>> >>>You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick >>>Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. >>>Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to >>>expose the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of >>>them, e.g. >>>Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don >>>Jr. >>>and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled >>>the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case >>>do you arrest the big fish at the very top. >>> >>>Don't you watch crime shows on TV? >> >> It's obvious you do, but you see this is not a crime family > > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhhhh > *gasp* > > Thank you, I really needed a good belly laugh today. :) IAWTP. These clowns are the very definition of mobsters. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad70719e216eb4a62@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724053 |
In article <gahs1rFcsg0U10@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... > >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 23:04:49 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:55:46 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <q209ls$ptt$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 17:38:53 -0500, Stinky Grezzeggelz Hell, Fleabitten >>>>Nazi Rapist grezzeggelled: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <...> >>>>> >>>>>>So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I >>>>>>suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the >>>>>>above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >>>>> >>>>> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a >>>>> single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for >>>>> almost two years? >>>> >>>>You see, how it works is, first you go after the little fish -- Rick >>>>Gates, for example -- and flip them on the next higher-ups in the chain. >>>>Then you nail some of them -- Manafort, for one -- and get them to >>>>expose the misdeeds a level higher still. And then you go after one of >>>>them, e.g. >>>>Cohen, and at some point you go for a truly major player -- likely Don >>>>Jr. >>>>and/or Kushner will soon be in the hot seat. Only once you have unrolled >>>>the criminal organization from the bottom up and built a very solid case >>>>do you arrest the big fish at the very top. >>>> >>>>Don't you watch crime shows on TV? >>> >>> It's obvious you do, but you see this is not a crime family >> >> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! >> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! >> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! >> AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhhhh >> *gasp* >> >> Thank you, I really needed a good belly laugh today. :) > >IAWTP. > >These clowns are the very definition of mobsters. The KKKLinton foundation
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q20a0g$j22$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724011 |
On 1/19/2019 2:38 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > <...> > >> So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >> but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >> drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. > > Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed > to file a single criminal charge against the President after > trying so hard for almost two years? > > How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? > I have a feeling that Mueller is going to focus its "main" point of attack on Don Jr.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q25r2b$4gr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724026 |
On 1/19/2019 2:57 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 1/19/2019 2:38 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>> but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>> drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >> >> Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed >> to file a single criminal charge against the President after >> trying so hard for almost two years? >> >> How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? >> > > I have a feeling that Mueller is going to focus its "main" point of > attack on Don Jr. Funny how the "church" wrt the so-called "racist" students instantly thought of expelling and destroying their lives without even getting the whole story? Why not act that way against the damn molester priests? Wow!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q209p4$j22$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724003 |
On 1/19/2019 2:29 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:40:07 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>> boring. >>>>> How about a new topic? >>>>> >>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >>> investigation- >>>>> after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>> BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>>> >>>>> Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>> "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want >>>>> to know. >>>> >>>> >>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>>> you...LOLOLOL >>> >>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] >> >> Not for common knowledge it isn't. > > So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected > but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of > drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. > Is Bill a better person than Harvey? Btw, have you ever wondered about what Obama really meant during this hot mic moment?: https://youtu.be/keXx0zxTarE?t=56 Humm... Why does this seem to get a total pass! ;^/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gahpm2Fcsg0U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #724003 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:40:07 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>>boring. >>>>>How about a new topic? >>>>> >>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >>> investigation- >>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>>> >>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want >>>>>to know. >>>> >>>> >>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>>> you...LOLOLOL >>> >>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] >> >> Not for common knowledge it isn't. > > So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected > but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of > drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. Poof, kooky? Seriously, you're full of shit, and I'm offended you would think I was a fan of the Cheeto Benito. I would love it if the allegation is true. I want it to be true. I'm still hoping it's true. But Mueller's statement is common knowledge. I heard about it on both CBS and ABC radio networks. In the future, try to be more objective, mmmkay? That's what separates a journalist from a partisan hack. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q20st5$ptt$39@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724045 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 23:20:34 +0000, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:40:07 +0000, vallor wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>>>boring. >>>>>>How about a new topic? >>>>>> >>>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >>>> investigation- >>>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>>>> >>>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds >>>>>>want to know. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>>>> you...LOLOLOL >>>> >>>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] >>> >>> Not for common knowledge it isn't. >> >> So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >> but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >> drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. > > Poof, kooky? > > Seriously, you're full of shit, and I'm offended you would think I was a > fan of the Cheeto Benito. > > I would love it if the allegation is true. I want it to be true. I'm > still hoping it's true. > > But Mueller's statement is common knowledge. I heard about it on both > CBS and ABC radio networks. > > In the future, try to be more objective, mmmkay? That's what separates > a journalist from a partisan hack. Objective?! Trump's putting kids in concentration camps and this goofball is telling me to try to be more *objective*?! It'd be hilarious if it wasn't, in large part, what got us into this mess in the first place: "centrists" affecting an attitude of being "above the fray" (aka fiddling while our republic burns)... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36adb2f08cdb629c99607e@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #724081 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q20st5$ptt$39@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # > In the future, try to be more objective, mmmkay? That's what separates # > a journalist from a partisan hack. # # Objective?! # # Trump's putting kids in concentration camps and this goofball is telling # me to try to be more *objective*?! Nice example of you being "objective," KOo0k... -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ae45e23250bd1ba94@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724081 |
In article <q20st5$ptt$39@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 23:20:34 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:40:07 +0000, vallor wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>>>>boring. >>>>>>>How about a new topic? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >>>>> investigation- >>>>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds >>>>>>>want to know. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>>>>> you...LOLOLOL >>>>> >>>>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] >>>> >>>> Not for common knowledge it isn't. >>> >>> So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >>> but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >>> drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. >> >> Poof, kooky? >> >> Seriously, you're full of shit, and I'm offended you would think I was a >> fan of the Cheeto Benito. >> >> I would love it if the allegation is true. I want it to be true. I'm >> still hoping it's true. >> >> But Mueller's statement is common knowledge. I heard about it on both >> CBS and ABC radio networks. >> >> In the future, try to be more objective, mmmkay? That's what separates >> a journalist from a partisan hack. > >Objective?! > >Trump's putting kids in concentration camps and this goofball is telling >me to try to be more *objective*?! Prove it. > >It'd be hilarious if it wasn't, in large part, what got us into this mess >in the first place: "centrists" affecting an attitude of being "above the >fray" (aka fiddling while our republic burns)... It's you lefty libs who want to just let anyone enter and do as they please.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gagbg5F4q1mU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #723841 |
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 22:09:52 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> # > Empty quiver again? >> # >> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer? >> # >> # <snicker> >> >> Bullseye. > > Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit boring. > How about a new topic? > > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- investigation- > after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- > BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 > > Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of > "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want to > know. Why would you change subjects without trimming? -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ace33314172217996075@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723924 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <gagbg5F4q1mU1@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... # # On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 22:09:52 +0000, Nadegda wrote: # # > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # >> # > Empty quiver again? # >> # # >> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer? # >> # # >> # <snicker> # >> # >> Bullseye. # > # > Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit boring. # > How about a new topic? # > # > https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- # investigation- # > after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- # > BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 # > # > Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of # > "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want to # > know. # # Why would you change subjects without trimming? She did trim the part that she found... "uncomfortable". According to the latest news reports, her proposed new topic may make her a little uncomfortable too, since Mueller has issued a statement that the claim she so eagerly glommed onto was apparently false. Now I must LOL many times. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <loi64elqsshovd2o5arq51021uuq2suvgs@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #723924 |
On 19 Jan 2019 10:12:21 GMT, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: <...> >Why would you change subjects without trimming? Because he's an asshole! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bt9j29.fak.17.7@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #723131 |
On 2019-01-12 1:54 a.m., Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 00:25:23 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q1c6tn$gdu$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >> # >> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! # On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:22:16 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> # >> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> by # > Checkmate! In article <q16kid$jer$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> # > @gmail.invalid says... >> # > >> # > >> # > # The kookologists. Libtard, kensi, myself, and whoever else is left >> of # > the # old guard. >> # > # >> # > >> # > "Old Guard"? You and the rest of your sock entourage # >> # Proof, kooky? >> # >> # > only crawled out of the woodwork after I spanked Burnore out of AUK. >> # >> # Wrong. I've been active here since 2012 and kensi for even longer. >> Check # google's archives if you don't believe me. >> >> PPPOSTFU... > > What's the third "P" stand for? I've not seen that variation before. > > Oh, and: > > <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me> > <k3tpcp$the$1@speranza.aioe.org> > > SPNAK!x2 > > And an additional echoing SPNAK! because the snicker at the end of the > latter post was at your expense. > > <snicker> > > (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce back, > and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I miss kensi, > physics questions like that are right up her alley.) > just about everything has been up her alley
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <16vj3e1tuppvp6nkv0me6se0otj4rrsvms@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #723137 |
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 07:27:52 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2019-01-12 1:54 a.m., Nadegda wrote: <...> >> (If an echo takes six whole years to get to the mountains, bounce back, >> and hit you again, how far away are those mountains? Damn, I miss kensi, >> physics questions like that are right up her alley.) >> >just about everything has been up her alley LOL! IAWTP!!! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a208eaf92f3689995f4b@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #722902 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q16kid$jer$28@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 09:33:06 -0500, Stinky Zegzegglez Hell, Fleabitten # Nazi Rapist zegzeggled: # # > On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 07:01:17 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda # > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: # >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # >>On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 22:30:08 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # >>> In article <GDHWD.113546$LD7.52953@fx20.iad>, JW@me.com says... # >>> # On 1/1/2019 3:15 AM, kensi wrote: # >>> # > Climate change is causing both more-frequent and more-severe # >>> calamities. # >>> # > Add to that ongoing threats from earthquakes, tornadoes, and # >>> volcanoes # # >>> # You left out the sky is falling; it hit you on the head. # >>> # >>> Kensi's<SPANK> # >> # >>undoubtedly become very busy with her move/preparations to move to # >>Helsinki. # >> # >>Which has you kooks pining away for her so badly one of you felt the # >>need to pretend to be her and start new climate change threads on her # >>behalf just to feel like she was still near. # > # > P<SMACKAKOOK!> # # Duck that quacks the loudest is the one that got shot, as per usual. # # <snicker> # # >>I've never seen such devotion in a kook before; we may need to invent a # >>new award for that, some sort of super-Woodhouse. # > # > We? # # The kookologists. Libtard, kensi, myself, and whoever else is left of the # old guard. There's only one legitimate, verified Ko0kologist here, and it ain't any of YOUR socks. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.369fd402d40fbd818d9@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #722767 |
In article <q1467t$jer$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 22:30:08 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <GDHWD.113546$LD7.52953@fx20.iad>, JW@me.com >> says... >> >> >> # >> # On 1/1/2019 3:15 AM, kensi wrote: >> # > Climate change is causing both more-frequent and more-severe >> calamities. >> # > Add to that ongoing threats from earthquakes, tornadoes, and >> volcanoes # >> # You left out the sky is falling; it hit you on the head. >> >> Kensi's<SPANK> > >undoubtedly become very busy with her move/preparations to move to >Helsinki. > >Which has you kooks pining away for her so badly one of you felt the need >to pretend to be her and start new climate change threads on her behalf >just to feel like she was still near. > >I've never seen such devotion in a kook before; we may need to invent a >new award for that, some sort of super-Woodhouse. > ><snicker> Is there a lumber yard in your town?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36a007551eecf11e995f3d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #722767 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q1467t$jer$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... # # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 22:30:08 -0800, Checkmate wrote: # # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by # > Checkmate! In article <GDHWD.113546$LD7.52953@fx20.iad>, JW@me.com # > says... # > # > # > # # > # On 1/1/2019 3:15 AM, kensi wrote: # > # > Climate change is causing both more-frequent and more-severe # > calamities. # > # > Add to that ongoing threats from earthquakes, tornadoes, and # > volcanoes # # > # You left out the sky is falling; it hit you on the head. # > # > Kensi's<SPANK> # # undoubtedly become very busy with her move/preparations to move to # Helsinki. # # Which has you kooks pining away for her so badly one of you felt the need # to pretend to be her and start new climate change threads on her behalf # just to feel like she was still near. # # I've never seen such devotion in a kook before; we may need to invent a # new award for that, some sort of super-Woodhouse. # # <snicker> Fake Nads. Beware of any and all future posts by Ko0ks claiming to be Teh Real Nads. The real Nads has been permaspanked (tm) and ran away in shame, never to return. Good riddance to bad rubbish, I say! -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bt2f53.hs7.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #722826 |
On 2019-01-09 2:28 p.m., Checkmate wrote: > I've never seen such devotion in a kook before a plageristic fake nads , this quote is from star wars " I've never seen such devotion in a kook before "
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <88sc3el5cb1ohkc8884delu1c1gfd3jqfq@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #722826 |
On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:28:31 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >Checkmate! In article <q1467t$jer$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >@gmail.invalid says... > > ># ># Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ># On Thu, 03 Jan 2019 22:30:08 -0800, Checkmate wrote: ># ># > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ># > Checkmate! In article <GDHWD.113546$LD7.52953@fx20.iad>, JW@me.com ># > says... ># > ># > ># > # ># > # On 1/1/2019 3:15 AM, kensi wrote: ># > # > Climate change is causing both more-frequent and more-severe ># > calamities. ># > # > Add to that ongoing threats from earthquakes, tornadoes, and ># > volcanoes # ># > # You left out the sky is falling; it hit you on the head. ># > ># > Kensi's<SPANK> ># ># undoubtedly become very busy with her move/preparations to move to ># Helsinki. ># ># Which has you kooks pining away for her so badly one of you felt the need ># to pretend to be her and start new climate change threads on her behalf ># just to feel like she was still near. ># ># I've never seen such devotion in a kook before; we may need to invent a ># new award for that, some sort of super-Woodhouse. ># ># <snicker> > >Fake Nads. Beware of any and all future posts by Ko0ks claiming to be >Teh Real Nads. The real Nads has been permaspanked (tm) and ran away in >shame, never to return. Good riddance to bad rubbish, I say! LOL! You just posted yesterday how you had single-handedly spanked Nads/kensi off Usenet and were gloating about it. Turns out you were wrong and thus self-spnaked because the headers indicate it is either a perfect forgery or it's the real Nads. Since perfect forgeries don't exist due to a number of reasons, it can be correctly assumed that this is the REAL Nads. SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web