Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #720947 > unrolled thread

Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-26 11:38 -0500
    Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:07 -0500
      Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
        Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change kensi - 2018-12-27 10:10 -0700
          Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:35 -0500
            Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change kensi - 2018-12-27 10:36 -0700
              Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-27 13:29 -0600
                Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:10 -0500
        Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 01:37 -0500
          Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-28 02:07 -0500
            Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 05:53 -0700
          Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:17 -0500
            Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-28 12:36 -0500
              Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 12:34 -0500
                Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-29 21:09 -0500
                  Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-31 06:05 -0500
                    Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 13:21 -0500
                    Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-12-31 13:24 -0500
                    Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-31 11:40 -0800

#720947 — Re: 'Planetary emergency:' After 30 years, leaders are still fighting about climate change

On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:55:25 -0500, kensi wrote:

>Hidden in the 133-page document agreed upon at the UN climate change 
>talks was a compromise that many consider an infuriating distraction:
>
>https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/16/health/sutter-cop24-climate-talks/index.html

Some day, leaders will kick greenies to the curb and the weasels will
either devour each other or get real jobs doing things that matter
with the talent they have been prostituting for the false religion.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#720963

On 12/26/2018 11:38 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:55:25 -0500, kensi wrote:
> 
>> Hidden in the 133-page document agreed upon at the UN climate change
>> talks was a compromise that many consider an infuriating distraction:
>>
>> https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/16/health/sutter-cop24-climate-talks/index.html
> 
> Some day, leaders will kick greenies to the curb and the weasels will
> either devour each other or get real jobs doing things that matter
> with the talent they have been prostituting for the false religion.
> 
Curb maybe. Jobs never. The only things Libs know is spelling, grammar 
and lies. Jobs for that are rather limited.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721091

On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.

And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.

> Jobs for that are rather limited.

Are you kidding? The whole PR industry is full of idiots like you.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721094

On 2018-12-27 10:07 a.m., kensi wrote:
> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
> 
> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
> 
>> Jobs for that are rather limited.
> 
> Are you kidding? The whole PR industry is full of idiots like you.
> 
prove it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721108

On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:10:09 -0700, FAKE kensi wrote:

>On 2018-12-27 10:07 a.m., kensi wrote:
>> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>> 
>> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
>> 
>>> Jobs for that are rather limited.
>> 
>> Are you kidding? The whole PR industry is full of idiots like you.
>> 
>prove it

Pretty crummy froggery! 

-- 

Everybody here likes Yours Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721109

On 2018-12-27 10:35 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:10:09 -0700, FAKE kensi wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-12-27 10:07 a.m., kensi wrote:
>>> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>>>
>>> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
>>>
>>>> Jobs for that are rather limited.
>>>
>>> Are you kidding? The whole PR industry is full of idiots like you.
>>>
>> prove it
> 
> Pretty crummy froggery!
> 
prove it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721142

On 12/27/2018 11:36 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 2018-12-27 10:35 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:10:09 -0700, FAKE kensi wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-12-27 10:07 a.m., kensi wrote:
>>>> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>>>>
>>>> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
>>>>
>>>>> Jobs for that are rather limited.
>>>>
>>>> Are you kidding? The whole PR industry is full of idiots like you.
>>>>
>>> prove it
>>
>> Pretty crummy froggery!
>>
> prove it

 "kensi pupa" is stupid worm.


    "fake kensi pupa" says only 'prove it'

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721232

On 12/27/2018 2:29 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 12/27/2018 11:36 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 2018-12-27 10:35 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>> Pretty crummy froggery!
>>>
>> prove it
> 
>   "kensi pupa" is stupid worm.
> 
> 
>      "fake kensi pupa" says only 'prove it'

You spotted the fake! Well done! That makes you, let's see, hmm, 
slightly smarter than Scout!

Not that that's a very high bar to hurdle.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721205

On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:07:16 -0500, kensi wrote:

>On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>
>And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.

Black-and-white thinking greenies can't accept the legitimate choices
made by others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
In English language punctuation, a serial comma or series comma (also
called an Oxford comma or a Harvard comma) is a comma placed
immediately before the coordinating conjunction (usually and or or) in
a series of three or more terms.
...
the Associated Press Stylebook advises against it

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721206

On 12/28/2018 1:37 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:07:16 -0500, kensi wrote:
>> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>>
>> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
> 
> Black-and-white thinking greenies can't accept the legitimate choices
> made by others.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
> In English language punctuation, a serial comma or series comma (also
> called an Oxford comma or a Harvard comma) is a comma placed
> immediately before the coordinating conjunction (usually and or or) in
> a series of three or more terms.
> ....
> the Associated Press Stylebook advises against it

I have some Gorgonzola.  Would you like some Gorgonzola on your 
pomegranate?

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721217

On 2018-12-28 12:07 a.m., mixed nuts wrote:
> On 12/28/2018 1:37 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:07:16 -0500, kensi wrote:
>>> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>>>
>>> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
>>
>> Black-and-white thinking greenies can't accept the legitimate choices
>> made by others.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
>> In English language punctuation, a serial comma or series comma (also
>> called an Oxford comma or a Harvard comma) is a comma placed
>> immediately before the coordinating conjunction (usually and or or) in
>> a series of three or more terms.
>> ....
>> the Associated Press Stylebook advises against it
> 
> I have some Gorgonzola.  Would you like some Gorgonzola on your 
> pomegranate?
> 
i saw the big red and white light house

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721238

On 12/28/2018 1:37 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:07:16 -0500, kensi wrote:
> 
>> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>>
>> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
> 
> Black-and-white thinking greenies can't accept the legitimate choices
> made by others.
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
> In English language punctuation, a serial comma or series comma (also
> called an Oxford comma or a Harvard comma) is a comma placed
> immediately before the coordinating conjunction (usually and or or) in
> a series of three or more terms.
> ...
> the Associated Press Stylebook advises against it

The Associated Press Stylebook was written by idiots, obviously. As for 
why ...

https://goo.gl/images/3F28PV

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721243

On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:17:13 -0500, kensi wrote:

>On 12/28/2018 1:37 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 12:07:16 -0500, kensi wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/26/2018 1:07 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> The only things conservatards know is spelling, grammar and lies.
>>>
>>> And you don't even do grammar all that well. You're missing a comma.
>> 
>> Black-and-white thinking greenies can't accept the legitimate choices
>> made by others.
>> 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma
>> In English language punctuation, a serial comma or series comma (also
>> called an Oxford comma or a Harvard comma) is a comma placed
>> immediately before the coordinating conjunction (usually and or or) in
>> a series of three or more terms.
>> ...
>> the Associated Press Stylebook advises against it
>
>The Associated Press Stylebook was written by idiots, obviously.

Obvious to whom?

Apparently not to the writers of the The New York Times stylebook,
which is also cited in the wiki article.

A five-year-old might be excused for saying, "It is wrong because I
don't like it."

A fault-finding, black-and-white thinking (note the possible omission
of an Oxford comma ... snicker) five-year-old greenie might also fail
to make the distinction between a stylistic guideline and an
inviolable law of nature.

> As for why ...
>
>https://goo.gl/images/3F28PV

Since your childish assertion is wrong ... I don't care why you think
your assertion is supported.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721437

On 12/28/2018 12:36 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:17:13 -0500, kensi wrote:
>> As for why ...
>>
>> https://goo.gl/images/3F28PV
> 
> Since your childish assertion is wrong ... I don't care why you think
> your assertion is supported.

I took the liberty of snipping most of your foamage unread. Meanwhile my 
point stands, since I supported it with evidence (that you then failed 
to look at) whereas you "supported" your side with nothing but invective.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721506

On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:34:13 -0500, kensi wrote:

>On 12/28/2018 12:36 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 12:17:13 -0500, kensi wrote:
>>> As for why ...
>>>
>>> https://goo.gl/images/3F28PV
>> 
>> Since your childish assertion is wrong ... I don't care why you think
>> your assertion is supported.
>
>I took the liberty of snipping most of your foamage unread. Meanwhile my 
>point stands, 

Your "point" (which you snipped) was "The Associated Press Stylebook
was written by idiots."

>since I supported it with evidence (that you then failed 
>to look at) whereas you "supported" your side with nothing but invective.

Describe your "evidence" that "The Associated Press Stylebook was
written by idiots."

Is it any better than your "evidence" that the sky is falling because
of AGW and we're all gonna die?

Why are you hiding the URL with a short link?

What invective? You said benj was "missing a comma" ... according to
your stylistic preference, which is not an inviolable law of nature
... or do you think it is?


 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721715

On 12/29/2018 9:09 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> Describe your "evidence" that "The Associated Press Stylebook was
> written by idiots."

No, you lazy bastard, you lift your finger up and click on my link.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721746

On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 06:05:01 -0500, kensi wrote:

>On 12/29/2018 9:09 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>> Describe your "evidence" that "The Associated Press Stylebook was
>> written by idiots."
>
>No, you lazy bastard, you lift your finger up and click on my link.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721748

On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 06:05:01 -0500, kensi wrote:

>On 12/29/2018 9:09 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>> Describe your "evidence" that "The Associated Press Stylebook was
>> written by idiots."
>
>No, you lazy bastard, you lift your finger up and click on my link.

Why?

It's a kensi-link, so why^2?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721767

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <q0ct5b$11qq$5@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


# 
# On 12/29/2018 9:09 PM, Wally W. wrote:
# > Describe your "evidence" that "The Associated Press Stylebook was
# > written by idiots."
# 
# No, you lazy bastard, you lift your finger up and click on my link.

I've got a finger to lift for you...

-- 
Checkmate ®
Copyright © 2018
all rights reserved 

AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore)
Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker
award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll)
Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012

Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web