Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #720012 > unrolled thread

Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-21 15:38 -0800
    Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-26 07:03 -0600
      Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. KlausSchadenfreude <klausschadenfreudeREMOVE@null.net> - 2018-12-26 05:21 -0800
        Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:38 -0700
      Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:18 -0600
        Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 07:21 -0700
        Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. KlausSchadenfreude <klausschadenfreudeREMOVE@null.net> - 2018-12-26 06:26 -0800
          Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:59 -0600
            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 08:07 -0700
            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:26 -0700
        Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-26 08:26 -0700
          Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:15 -0500
            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. kensi - 2018-12-27 10:16 -0700
              Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-27 22:20 -0500
                Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 07:20 +0000
                  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 03:27 -0800
                  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:14 -0700
                    Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 11:59 -0500
                      Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:11 -0700
                    Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-28 17:47 +0000
                      Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 11:30 -0700
                Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 11:58 -0500
                  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:11 -0700
                  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:26 -0500
                    Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:36 -0700
                      Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:44 -0500
                        Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:47 -0700
                          Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 13:19 -0500
                            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 11:26 -0700
                            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-28 11:14 -0800
                              Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-28 14:22 -0500
                                Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 12:29 -0700
                                Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-30 00:01 -0800
                                  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-30 09:53 -0500
                                    Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-30 19:11 -0800
                                  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-31 06:10 -0500
                                    Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-31 11:29 -0800
                                      Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-31 15:40 -0500
                                        Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-31 18:37 -0800
            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-27 20:05 -0700
              Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 20:08 -0700
                Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 09:14 -0700
                  Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 09:24 -0700
              NOMINATION Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:03 -0500
                Re: NOMINATION Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:14 -0700
                Re: NOMINATION Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-28 11:07 -0800
                Re: NOMINATION Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-12-28 12:10 -0800
            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>" <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 22:29 -0800
        Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 14:42 -0700
          Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-26 16:48 -0500
            Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 14:54 -0700

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#720012 — Re: In North America, the good life is just handed to you on a platter.

On 21 Dec 2018 17:13:40 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote:
>> On 2018-12-21 10:39 a.m., Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 08:36:17 -0700, Snit
>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 12/21/18 6:02 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2018 17:19:11 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> *plonk*
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> My every post is just whining about my insecurity. It is weird.
>>> 
>>> Your angry behavior is not really *that* weird. We expect that from
>>> trolls.
>>> 
>>> More on Snit's trolling
>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html
>>> 
>>> Over 100 people ridicule Snit
>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html
>>> 
>>> Typical Snit trolling methods
>>> http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html
>> 
>> Those links really need to be updated. All of my witty insults toward 
>> Snit, such as calling him the Prescott Parasite, are unfortunately omitted.
>> 
>> 
>
>My cowardice will live forever. 

Nah, you're just not that memorable of a troll.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#720918

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:

>On 21 Dec 2018 17:13:40 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>wrote:

*plonk*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720920

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 07:03:58 -0600, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>
>>On 21 Dec 2018 17:13:40 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>wrote:
>
>*plonk*

Oh noes!  LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720921

On 2018-12-26 6:21 a.m., KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 07:03:58 -0600, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
> wrote:
> 
>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 Dec 2018 17:13:40 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>> *plonk*
> 
> Oh noes!  LOL
> 
now you did it you'll be so lonely

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720929

chrisv wrote:

> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>
>>On 21 Dec 2018 17:13:40 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>wrote:
>
> *plonk*

Hmm...  Having some filter problems.  It looks like I plonked "Klaus"
last week, and the responses are still getting through!  The most
recent one, in response to the post above, was deleted, unread.

Was I called a "liar"?  If so, what a "surprise".  Shitty bastards
*leap* at the opportunity to attack their superiors.

Check-out, in my sig below, the lying asshole "-hh", *baselessly*
accusing an honest man of lying.

"-hh" had claimed that the cola advocates "whine about how Photoshop
costs 600 and is a waste, while claiming that the same capabilities
can be accomplished for free".

In truth, no one had claimed that "the same" capabilities can be
accomplished for free.  Likewise, no one had made unqualified claims
that Photoshop "is a waste".

When I called "-hh" out on his *lies*, he pretended that the objection
was to the *one* part of his statement that was *not* a lie (that cola
advocates considered Photoshop to be "expensive").  It was then
demonstrated that advocates had indeed complained about the cost,
making *me* the "liar"!

Lying "is all" that I have, he claimed.  Even though I've never lied,
in here.  While he lies all the time.  What a prick!

-- 
"Unfortunately, lying is all that chrisv has."  -  lying asshole
"-hh", calling an honest man a liar, after I *correctly* called him
out on his *lies* that advocates made unqualified claims that
Photoshop "is a waste", and that advocates claimed that "the same"
capabilities as Photoshop has can be accomplished for free.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720930

On 2018-12-26 7:18 a.m., chrisv wrote:
> chrisv wrote:
> 
>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21 Dec 2018 17:13:40 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>> *plonk*
> 
> Hmm...  Having some filter problems.  It looks like I plonked "Klaus"
> last week, and the responses are still getting through!  The most
> recent one, in response to the post above, was deleted, unread.
> 
> Was I called a "liar"?  If so, what a "surprise".  Shitty bastards
> *leap* at the opportunity to attack their superiors.
> 
> Check-out, in my sig below, the lying asshole "-hh", *baselessly*
> accusing an honest man of lying.
> 
> "-hh" had claimed that the cola advocates "whine about how Photoshop
> costs 600 and is a waste, while claiming that the same capabilities
> can be accomplished for free".
> 
> In truth, no one had claimed that "the same" capabilities can be
> accomplished for free.  Likewise, no one had made unqualified claims
> that Photoshop "is a waste".
> 
> When I called "-hh" out on his *lies*, he pretended that the objection
> was to the *one* part of his statement that was *not* a lie (that cola
> advocates considered Photoshop to be "expensive").  It was then
> demonstrated that advocates had indeed complained about the cost,
> making *me* the "liar"!
> 
> Lying "is all" that I have, he claimed.  Even though I've never lied,
> in here.  While he lies all the time.  What a prick!
> 
so what

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720933

On Wed, 26 Dec 2018 08:18:42 -0600, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
wrote:

>chrisv wrote:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>
>>>On 21 Dec 2018 17:13:40 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>wrote:
>>
>> *plonk*
>
>Hmm...  Having some filter problems.  It looks like I plonked "Klaus"
>last week, and the responses are still getting through!  The most
>recent one, in response to the post above, was deleted, unread.

I'll bet you read it over and over again, until your curiosity was
satisfied.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720935

KlausSchadenfreude wrote:

> (snipped, unread)

I might, later, read the % post where he reponded to you.  

I normally delete/ignore posts when there is nothing to expect but
some asshole lashing-out to save face.  In this case, there's not much
downside to taking a peak and seeing if I anticipated correctly.

I know that the "-hh" asshole has falsely accused myself and others of
lying about our filters and such.  He pretends to not understand that
I can be so much better than him that I can often anticipate responses
and address them, without reading his garbage.

"-hh" will use "logic" like "he wouldn't have written that, if he had
not actually read the post".  (and, even here, he will say 'how does
chrisv know that I use that "logic"?')

Duh.  Because I'm smart?  Because I'm experienced?  Because I've seen
numerous trolls use these tactics, when they get ignored?

Nah, according to that stupid, lying *asshole*, I "lie" about what I
read, or not.  (What gain there would be in that, for me, I've not
figured-out.)  

It's not that I'm so smart, it's that I read something, lie about not
reading it, and then stupidly "self nuke" by responding to it.  That's
the world-view of a dishonest person, an inferior person, the lying
asshole "-hh".

-- 
"So much for chrisv's claims of a 'zero day' killfile."  -  lying
asshole "-hh", implying dishonesty on my part, but in fact simply too
stupid to figure-out what a "zero day plonk" is

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720936

On 2018-12-26 7:59 a.m., chrisv wrote:
> KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
> 
>> (snipped, unread)
> 
> I might, later, read the % post where he reponded to you.
> 
> I normally delete/ignore posts when there is nothing to expect but
> some asshole lashing-out to save face.  In this case, there's not much
> downside to taking a peak and seeing if I anticipated correctly.
> 
> I know that the "-hh" asshole has falsely accused myself and others of
> lying about our filters and such.  He pretends to not understand that
> I can be so much better than him that I can often anticipate responses
> and address them, without reading his garbage.
> 
> "-hh" will use "logic" like "he wouldn't have written that, if he had
> not actually read the post".  (and, even here, he will say 'how does
> chrisv know that I use that "logic"?')
> 
> Duh.  Because I'm smart?  Because I'm experienced?  Because I've seen
> numerous trolls use these tactics, when they get ignored?
> 
> Nah, according to that stupid, lying *asshole*, I "lie" about what I
> read, or not.  (What gain there would be in that, for me, I've not
> figured-out.)
> 
> It's not that I'm so smart, it's that I read something, lie about not
> reading it, and then stupidly "self nuke" by responding to it.  That's
> the world-view of a dishonest person, an inferior person, the lying
> asshole "-hh".
> 
so

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720941

In article <ge472eluasgf6ba5hrgmllp22rmmnign0j@4ax.com>, 
chrisv@nospam.invalid says...
>
>KlausSchadenfreude wrote:
>
>> (snipped, unread)
>
>I might, later, read the % post where he reponded to you.  
>
>I normally delete/ignore posts when there is nothing to expect but
>some asshole lashing-out to save face.  In this case, there's not much
>downside to taking a peak and seeing if I anticipated correctly.
>
>I know that the "-hh" asshole has falsely accused myself and others of
>lying about our filters and such.  He pretends to not understand that
>I can be so much better than him that I can often anticipate responses
>and address them, without reading his garbage.
>
>"-hh" will use "logic" like "he wouldn't have written that, if he had
>not actually read the post".  (and, even here, he will say 'how does
>chrisv know that I use that "logic"?')
>
>Duh.  Because I'm smart?  Because I'm experienced?  Because I've seen
>numerous trolls use these tactics, when they get ignored?
>
>Nah, according to that stupid, lying *asshole*, I "lie" about what I
>read, or not.  (What gain there would be in that, for me, I've not
>figured-out.)  
>
>It's not that I'm so smart, it's that I read something, lie about not
>reading it, and then stupidly "self nuke" by responding to it.  That's
>the world-view of a dishonest person, an inferior person, the lying
>asshole "-hh".

What's your point?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720940

In article <gk172ehvslun5d3p4s7vtjcobju62bmc4a@4ax.com>, 
chrisv@nospam.invalid says...



>Check-out, in my sig below, the lying asshole "-hh", *baselessly*
>accusing an honest man of lying.
>


Oh a Kavanaugh thing huh?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721096

On 12/26/2018 10:26 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <gk172ehvslun5d3p4s7vtjcobju62bmc4a@4ax.com>,
> chrisv@nospam.invalid says...
>> Check-out, in my sig below, the lying asshole "-hh", *baselessly*
>> accusing an honest man of lying.
> 
> Oh a Kavanaugh thing huh?

No, ko0ky, he said an *honest* man.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721098

On 2018-12-27 10:15 a.m., kensi wrote:
> On 12/26/2018 10:26 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <gk172ehvslun5d3p4s7vtjcobju62bmc4a@4ax.com>,
>> chrisv@nospam.invalid says...
>>> Check-out, in my sig below, the lying asshole "-hh", *baselessly*
>>> accusing an honest man of lying.
>>
>> Oh a Kavanaugh thing huh?
> 
> No, ko0ky, he said an *honest* man.
> 
you wouldn't know any

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721200

"kensi" wrote in message news:brvmvc.bpr.17.2@news.alt.net...
> On 2018-12-27 10:15 a.m., kensi wrote:

More evidence the snit virus is spreading among the trolls 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721207

Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> "kensi" wrote in message news:brvmvc.bpr.17.2@news.alt.net...
>> On 2018-12-27 10:15 a.m., kensi wrote:
> 
> More evidence the snit virus is spreading among the trolls 
> 

Just keep in mind it is not me you loathe — you do not know me. You loathe
how I tend to back my views so well. 

This group is fun that way. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721213

On 28 Dec 2018 07:20:53 GMT, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:

>Just keep in mind it is not me you loathe — you do not know me. 

Everyone knows you.

But the fact that you angrily deny it is, well, interesting.



More on Snit's trolling
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html

Over 100 people ridicule Snit
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html

Typical Snit trolling methods
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721221

In article <g8m16lFasa1U1@mid.individual.net>, 
usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says...
>
>Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> "kensi" wrote in message news:brvmvc.bpr.17.2@news.alt.net...
>>> On 2018-12-27 10:15 a.m., kensi wrote:
>> 
>> More evidence the snit virus is spreading among the trolls 
>> 
>
>Just keep in mind it is not me you loathe ? you do not know me. You loathe
>how I tend to back my views so well. 
>
>This group is fun that way. 

Problem is, you never back them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721227

On 12/28/2018 11:14 AM, Skeeter wrote:

> Problem is, you never back them.

And bye-bye irony meter #TREE(3).

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721235

In article <q05kp3$1emo$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>
>On 12/28/2018 11:14 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>
>> Problem is, you never back them.
>
>And bye-bye irony meter #TREE(3).

Lern to spel. maroon.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#721247

Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> In article <g8m16lFasa1U1@mid.individual.net>, 
> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says...
>> 
>> Scout <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> "kensi" wrote in message news:brvmvc.bpr.17.2@news.alt.net...
>>>> On 2018-12-27 10:15 a.m., kensi wrote:
>>> 
>>> More evidence the snit virus is spreading among the trolls 
>>> 
>> 
>> Just keep in mind it is not me you loathe ? you do not know me. You loathe
>> how I tend to back my views so well. 
>> 
>> This group is fun that way. 
> 
> Problem is, you never back them.
> 

Hence why you list so many unsupported claims. Got it. 

Face it — even though I am not perfect by any means, I back my views far
better than most in here. And I rarely sink to the insults others use to
try to feel better about themselves. 

But this is all meta-nonsense. Why not focus on a topic other than your own
need to put me down with vague accusations?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web