Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #720017 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-12-21 23:42 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-12-26 21:06 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 182 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-21 23:42 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 17:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-21 19:35 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-21 17:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 01:20 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-21 21:16 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 02:30 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:48 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:50 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 17:22 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 10:24 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 17:21 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-12-21 21:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-21 22:11 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-22 04:10 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 08:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:57 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 09:20 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 11:58 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-22 17:53 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 01:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-22 23:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-23 09:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 07:22 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 09:10 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:54 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:01 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 11:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:55 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 14:24 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 11:33 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 10:53 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-23 10:57 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-23 22:35 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 20:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 18:11 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 11:31 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 11:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 15:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 13:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 13:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 18:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 16:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:28 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 17:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 17:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 22:49 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:48 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:33 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 16:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-24 18:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:32 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-24 19:39 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:29 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-27 16:34 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-24 19:41 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:26 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-24 20:32 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 21:00 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 05:47 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 19:45 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 06:04 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 01:16 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 04:34 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 08:11 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 10:46 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 08:58 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:02 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:31 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:07 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 12:30 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:05 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:09 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:39 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-28 12:21 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-28 10:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-28 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-28 10:52 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-29 13:00 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:28 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-27 11:19 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 16:27 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:03 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:48 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 12:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:47 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 10:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 18:02 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:05 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-12-26 19:53 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 13:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 11:26 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 12:23 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 12:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-25 13:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 11:28 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 10:43 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:14 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 14:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-25 12:39 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 16:11 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-25 17:59 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:40 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:08 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-22 09:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:12 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-27 00:13 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-22 10:47 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-22 08:50 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:15 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 21:15 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 09:19 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-22 22:32 +0000
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-22 19:09 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:10 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-23 09:12 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-23 11:22 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-23 13:36 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-24 11:07 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-23 19:27 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:19 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-27 11:54 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-27 10:01 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-27 21:04 -0800
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:16 -0500
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-26 21:16 -0700
Re: Climate change and marine mass extinction "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-12-26 21:06 -0500
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <shn42e9i6sjnu9bfsqbfatpdq11e04ajpj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720795 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:40:35 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >Of course air doesn't "blow through the glass," you moron. Warm air on >one side and cold air on the other creates a gradient, . . . Yes, good so far... > . . .where the heat >migrates from the warmer side to the colder side. And, conversely, the cold migrates from the colder side to the warmer side. Action/reaction. You just proved my point, dude. So the cold outside air does migrate through the window pane causing the pane to transfer the cold into the house. >Cold does NOT migrate >towards the warmer side, because cold is a condition, not a thing. >Heat is a thing. Cold is what's left when heat is removed. Heat is also a condition, so why two different rules? <trim gratuitous insults> -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 09:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368c0846c0c12ff995cd3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720798 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <shn42e9i6sjnu9bfsqbfatpdq11e04ajpj@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:40:35 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ >Of course air doesn't "blow through the glass," you moron. Warm air on @@@@@ >one side and cold air on the other creates a gradient, . . . @@@@@ @@@@@ Yes, good so far... @@@@@ @@@@@ > . . .where the heat @@@@@ >migrates from the warmer side to the colder side. @@@@@ @@@@@ And, conversely, the cold migrates from the colder @@@@@ side to the warmer side. Action/reaction. You just @@@@@ proved my point, dude. So the cold outside air does @@@@@ migrate through the window pane causing the pane @@@@@ to transfer the cold into the house. @@@@@ @@@@@ >Cold does NOT migrate @@@@@ >towards the warmer side, because cold is a condition, not a thing. @@@@@ >Heat is a thing. Cold is what's left when heat is removed. @@@@@ @@@@@ Heat is also a condition, so why two different rules? @@@@@ @@@@@ <trim gratuitous insults> Come back when you've studied the middle school physics lesson I provided for you. I have little patience for your ongoing ignorance... and nobody says "dude" anymore. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 19:22 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368b425a5c24a4e2995c94@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720695 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ <...> @@@@@ @@@@@ >Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it @@@@@ >left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! @@@@@ @@@@@ "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People @@@@@ who live where it gets below freezing often have to @@@@@ scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. @@@@@ @@@@@ According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their @@@@@ windshields because what little heat that got trapped @@@@@ inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of @@@@@ the windshield would get colder than the outside of the @@@@@ windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. @@@@@ @@@@@ Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! What is ice made out of, and how much of it do you have floating around on the inside of your crappy little van, Dumber-Than-Most? You can't possibly be as stupid as you appear to be! -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 23:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvsabi$117b$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720739 |
On 12/24/2018 10:22 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <ggp22etv60fic8tie874p3imqq8o9a3nad@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 13:26:32 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> Heat radiates out towards colder places (a gradient), making the space it >>> left colder. Cold does not "radiate" in to a warmer place. Dumbass! >> >> "And, a double dumbass on you!" Here's why. People >> who live where it gets below freezing often have to >> scrape ice and frost off the outside of their windshields. >> >> According to you, the ice would be on the insides of their >> windshields because what little heat that got trapped >> inside the car would be radiating out and the inside of >> the windshield would get colder than the outside of the >> windshield and so the frost would be on the inside. >> >> Try to weasel your way out of THAT one, Einstein! > > What is ice made out of, and how much of it do you have floating around > on the inside of your crappy little van, Dumber-Than-Most? You can't > possibly be as stupid as you appear to be! Southern boy living on a dirt road out in the forest with the squirrels who doesn't own a diesel pickup with 40" mudgrips can't be all that bright. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q02udn$18jr$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720655 |
On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, stinky puddles piddled: > So, you are just plain wrong as the dense > cold outside air definitely radiates through > the double-pane glass. > > If the warmer room air was radiating OUT > then it would push the drapes up against > the glass panes. As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 09:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvl32.csm.17.10@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721073 |
On 2018-12-27 9:25 a.m., kensi wrote: > On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, stinky puddles piddled: >> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense >> cold outside air definitely radiates through >> the double-pane glass. >> >> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT >> then it would push the drapes up against >> the glass panes. > > As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is > brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. > > Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. > then you'll be a dope on dope
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 11:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oe0a2e1kgoh1r08vubh5957geuil71924k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721073 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq typed: > >> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense >> cold outside air definitely radiates through >> the double-pane glass. >> >> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT >> then it would push the drapes up against >> the glass panes. > >As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is >brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. > >Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. No, it's called observational physics as opposed to your *theoretical* physics. It can be rightly assumed that warmer room air radiating outward from the room would cause the drapes to be pushed outward. Since exactly the opposite happens (drapes being pushed into the room by the cold radiating inwardly) that proves your theoretical physics is incorrect. You physicists are so full of it. Bah! You get all caught up in your math and in your grants that you totally ignore what your eyes and other senses tell you. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 09:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <brvlon.l48.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #721083 |
On 2018-12-27 9:51 a.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq typed: >> >>> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense >>> cold outside air definitely radiates through >>> the double-pane glass. >>> >>> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT >>> then it would push the drapes up against >>> the glass panes. >> >> As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is >> brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. >> >> Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. > > No, it's called observational physics as opposed to > your *theoretical* physics. > > It can be rightly assumed that warmer room air > radiating outward from the room would cause the > drapes to be pushed outward. Since exactly the > opposite happens (drapes being pushed into the > room by the cold radiating inwardly) that proves > your theoretical physics is incorrect. > > You physicists are so full of it. Bah! You get all > caught up in your math and in your grants that > you totally ignore what your eyes and other > senses tell you. > if you mean they don't listen to you , they don't
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 12:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q032us$2fi$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #721083 |
On 12/27/2018 11:51 AM, stinky puddles piddled: > You physicists are so full of it. ... says the *complete retard* who has his radiation and his convection all mixed up. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 10:27 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368eb94ed459ab9d995d27@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #721083 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <oe0a2e1kgoh1r08vubh5957geuil71924k@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... < < On Thu, 27 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: < >On 12/24/2018 3:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq typed: < > < >> So, you are just plain wrong as the dense < >> cold outside air definitely radiates through < >> the double-pane glass. < >> < >> If the warmer room air was radiating OUT < >> then it would push the drapes up against < >> the glass panes. < > < >As a physicist, let me be the first to tell you that the above is < >brain-hurtingly bizarre bullshit totally unsupported by science. < > < >Now someone fetch me a Tylenol. < < No, it's called observational physics as opposed to < your *theoretical* physics. < < It can be rightly assumed that warmer room air < radiating outward from the room would cause the < drapes to be pushed outward. Since exactly the < opposite happens (drapes being pushed into the < room by the cold radiating inwardly) that proves < your theoretical physics is incorrect. < < You physicists are so full of it. Bah! You get all < caught up in your math and in your grants that < you totally ignore what your eyes and other < senses tell you. I knew Kensi would be along to participate in your public spanking, IF she hadn't plonked your stupid ass completely. I was right, and you are wrong, and everybody in AC is LOLing@you. <LOLITY-LOL-LOL-LOL> -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-27 19:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g9ra2e5c0ve6cl1lhjv7c07du0r2du9v3k@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #721130 |
On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:27:00 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: <...> >I knew Kensi would be along to participate in your public spanking, IF >she hadn't plonked your stupid ass completely. I was right, and you are >wrong, and everybody in AC is LOLing@you. > ><LOLITY-LOL-LOL-LOL> You know nothing, Jon Snow! -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:31 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8eiogFmn5pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720639 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:11:35 -0800, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <3c222et9h87e1t6lsh233vn8e6992tnksv@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > > @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:07:26 -0500, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ >On 12/23/2018 8:07 > PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > @@@@@ >> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >>> The earth's SURFACE is warming. The earth's vast bulky > INTERIOR is COOLING @@@@@ >>> and has been for billions of years. The > earth as a whole is therefore @@@@@ >>> SHRINKING, though not by much. > Learn to read kensi's posts for @@@@@ >>> comprehension, lametard! > @@@@@ >> > @@@@@ >> Nice foot bullet, woman! If the Earth is shrinking that means > @@@@@ >> the Earth is becoming cooler. You can't have it both ways and > @@@@@ >> that's what you warmingtards are attempting to do. > @@@@@ > > @@@@@ >The earth's *interior* (the vast majority of its volume) is > becoming @@@@@ >cooler, while its surface (the tiny bit where we live) > is becoming @@@@@ >warmer. No contradiction. > @@@@@ > @@@@@ So, you are attempting to claim convection doesn't @@@@@ exist? > That's unscientific of you, carrot top. > > Maybe it's something like the cold that "radiates in" through your one > window. I wonder if mylar would be a good material for lining drapes -- it should reflect the cold rays back out of the window. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 08:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368bf7e1c3ab9fe9995cc4@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720771 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <g8eiogFmn5pU1@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... @@@@@ @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:11:35 -0800, Checkmate wrote: @@@@@ @@@@@ > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by @@@@@ > Checkmate! In article <3c222et9h87e1t6lsh233vn8e6992tnksv@4ax.com>, @@@@@ > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ On Mon, 24 Dec 2018 11:07:26 -0500, kensi @@@@@ > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ >On 12/23/2018 8:07 @@@@@ > PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda @@@@@ > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >>> The earth's SURFACE is warming. The earth's vast bulky @@@@@ > INTERIOR is COOLING @@@@@ >>> and has been for billions of years. The @@@@@ > earth as a whole is therefore @@@@@ >>> SHRINKING, though not by much. @@@@@ > Learn to read kensi's posts for @@@@@ >>> comprehension, lametard! @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> Nice foot bullet, woman! If the Earth is shrinking that means @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> the Earth is becoming cooler. You can't have it both ways and @@@@@ > @@@@@ >> that's what you warmingtards are attempting to do. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ > @@@@@ >The earth's *interior* (the vast majority of its volume) is @@@@@ > becoming @@@@@ >cooler, while its surface (the tiny bit where we live) @@@@@ > is becoming @@@@@ >warmer. No contradiction. @@@@@ > @@@@@ @@@@@ > @@@@@ So, you are attempting to claim convection doesn't @@@@@ exist? @@@@@ > That's unscientific of you, carrot top. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Maybe it's something like the cold that "radiates in" through your one @@@@@ > window. @@@@@ @@@@@ I wonder if mylar would be a good material for lining drapes -- it should @@@@@ reflect the cold rays back out of the window. Lead shielding might help. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 11:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p0n42edg5fln7ujiks20t9fi73vogrc2o0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #720789 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:17:14 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: <...> >Lead shielding might help. They make aluminum foil-based bubble wrap now. It makes great insulation considering how thin it is. Two layers of the stuff with a one-inch air gap amounts to about R-7. -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-25 12:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvtq2v$1cs6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720793 |
On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:17:14 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: > > <...> > >> Lead shielding might help. > > They make aluminum foil-based bubble wrap now. > It makes great insulation considering how thin it > is. > > Two layers of the stuff with a one-inch air gap > amounts to about R-7. So, if you had 100 layers with a 1 inch gap yielding R-700, all the cold would radiate away and the cold molecules couldn't get in and you could stay warm and toasty even when the ice age comes back? What about if a hurricane comes and puts a hole in your bubble wrap shield or blows it away? Did you think about that? Is it time to get a patent agent to write it up so you can get money from all the cold people? -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 12:15 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <g8h9ncF9juoU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #720810 |
On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:40:47 -0500, mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/25/2018 11:36 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 08:17:14 -0800, Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> wrote: >> >> <...> >> >>> Lead shielding might help. >> >> They make aluminum foil-based bubble wrap now. >> It makes great insulation considering how thin it >> is. >> >> Two layers of the stuff with a one-inch air gap >> amounts to about R-7. > > So, if you had 100 layers with a 1 inch gap yielding R-700, all the cold > would radiate away and the cold molecules couldn't get in and you could > stay warm and toasty even when the ice age comes back? What about if a > hurricane comes and puts a hole in your bubble wrap shield or blows it > away? Did you think about that? Is it time to get a patent agent to > write it up so you can get money from all the cold people? Larry Niven's Known Space had a device that could put out fires with a beam, called a "Fyrestop". Perhaps Professor Gerg could invent a device that transmits cold rays, and thus would save the planet from all kinds of destruction. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-24 09:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.368ab9571db7ab7776a@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #720555 |
In article <pvr080$16as$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/23/2018 8:07 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 22:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> The earth's SURFACE is warming. The earth's vast bulky INTERIOR is COOLING >>> and has been for billions of years. The earth as a whole is therefore >>> SHRINKING, though not by much. Learn to read kensi's posts for >>> comprehension, lametard! >> >> Nice foot bullet, woman! If the Earth is shrinking that means >> the Earth is becoming cooler. You can't have it both ways and >> that's what you warmingtards are attempting to do. > >The earth's *interior* (the vast majority of its volume) is becoming >cooler, while its surface (the tiny bit where we live) is becoming >warmer. No contradiction. Proof KoOk?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-23 18:58 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3689eb1ec18b349995c64@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #720457 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pvp2kd$ml8$41@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... @@@@@ @@@@@ Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! @@@@@ On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 13:31:13 -0500, Stinky Gerbilzz Hell, Fleabitten @@@@@ Rapist gerbilled: @@@@@ @@@@@ > On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, kensi <kkensingtard01@gmail.nospam.invalid> @@@@@ > wrote: @@@@@ >>On 12/22/2018, stinky puddles piddled: @@@@@ >>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> lied... @@@@@ >>> @@@@@ >>>> Why would she (kensi) waste it on Gzerrzglggz, instead of tossing off @@@@@ >>>> a quick smackdown of that kook and then using her intellect on @@@@@ >>>> something actually important? @@@@@ >>> @@@@@ >>> Something important like graphing the diameter of the Earth vs. the @@@@@ >>> temperature of the Earth. We all know that as a planetary body like @@@@@ >>> the Earth warms it also expands. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>You already got spanked on this in another thread, but since you @@@@@ >>*insist* on getting your spankings from me: @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>There's a slight (compared to the interior temperatures) warming of the @@@@@ >>surface. It has almost no effect on the Earth's size, except to maybe @@@@@ >>slow down, by a miniscule amount, the rate at which the core of the @@@@@ >>Earth is cooling, and thus slow down, by a miniscule amount, the rate at @@@@@ >>which the Earth is (already extreeeeeeemely slowly) shrinking. @@@@@ >> @@@@@ >>It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, expanding. @@@@@ > @@@@@ > Then show me a graph. The sad reality is the Earth herself WILL become @@@@@ > larger as she becomes warmer. @@@@@ @@@@@ The earth's SURFACE is warming. The earth's vast bulky INTERIOR is COOLING @@@@@ and has been for billions of years. The earth as a whole is therefore @@@@@ SHRINKING, though not by much. Learn to read kensi's posts for @@@@@ comprehension, lametard! Is Earth really a girl? -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-26 21:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q01i2o$d6b$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #720129 |
"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote in message news:2dfs1et4dhirkqbtf1lpmrg7c0ba7657qr@4ax.com... > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, "Scout" > <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> wrote: >>"Nadegda" wrote in message news:pvk3hi$ml8$18@dont-email.me... >>> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Skeeter wrote: >>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>>>On Fri, 21 Dec 2018, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>>>On 12/20/2018 10:23 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>>>>> On 12/19/2018 5:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile I note you are unable to refute any of the claims. >>>>>>>>>>>>> No >>>>>>>>>>>>> citations to peer-reviewed science support *your* side. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> When you start to prove your claims things might change. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They're proved at the site kensi linked to, and at the papers >>>>>>>>>>> referenced in the endnotes at the pages there, dimbulb. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I sai<SNACKAK00K!> >>>>>>>>> Read the referenced papers, whose existence Nadegda so helpfully >>>>>>>>> reminded you of. Then we'll talk. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I sup<SMACKAK00K!> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>First, the papers. >>>>>> >>>>>> You h<SMACKAKOOK!> >>>>> >>>>>I think he's not smart enough to find the links again, kensi. So I'll >>>>>repost them: >>>>> >>>>>https://www.skepticalscience.com/Are-humans-too-insignificant-to-affect-global-climate.htm >>>>> >>>>>https://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us.htm >>>>> >>>>>https://www.skepticalscience.com/co2-increase-is-natural-not-human-caused.htm >>>>> >>>>>https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-natural-cycle.htm >>>> >>>> Still<SMACKAKOOK!> >>> >>> READ THEM. >> >>Again? >> >>How many times are you going to present theories, suppositions, >>projections, >>assumptions, claims and assertions as proof of man made climate change? >> >>However, let's just take their own admission: >> >>"Of course, it's always possible that some natural cycle exists, unknown >>to >>scientists and their instruments, that is currently causing the planet to >>warm. There's always a chance that we could be totally wrong. This >>omnipresent fact of science is called irreducible uncertainty, because it >>can never be entirely eliminated. However, it's very unlikely that such a >>cycle exists." >> >>It's unlikely that such a cycle exists....except that we have event after >>event after even in which this unlikely cycle is known to have caused >>global >>climate change. Including increases in the CO2 and all through an utterly >>NATURAL process. Which, I note, they have utterly ignored the possibility >>of. According to them, everything that is taking place is only because of >>man. As far as this unknown cycle....it is unknown, because we have no >>firm >>grasp on exactly what forced the prior warming trends. What we DO know is >>that all the evidence shows that when a warming trend starts.....CO2 other >>other greenhouse gases are naturally released into the atmosphere that >>reinforces that warming trend. No, there is a lot about the causes, nature >>and even means by which global climate changes starts, proceeds and >>finally >>switches from moving temperatures in one direction to doing so in the >>opposite direction. >> >>Until scientists can explain in detail the triggers, methods, nature of >>processes of what drives natural climate change....then we are not in a >>position to discount that such a natural process is in play now. > > Smackdown on teh Nads! Teh retard hoist on her own petard. > > <snicker> And Zero response to date.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-22 09:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pvlgu3$1bi4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #720070 |
On 12/21/2018 9:16 PM, Scout wrote: > > Until scientists can explain in detail the triggers, methods, nature of > processes of what drives natural climate change....then we are not in a > position to discount that such a natural process is in play now. Expert without expertise. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web