Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #720387 > unrolled thread

NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  NO ONE  . ANSWERED       MY QUESTION .!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-23 05:28 -0800
    Re:NO ONE  . ANSWERED       MY QUESTION .!! Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com.INVALID> - 2018-12-23 15:53 +0100
      Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 08:09 -0700
        Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!! Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com.INVALID> - 2018-12-23 16:43 +0100
          Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-23 20:26 -0800
        Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-23 15:22 -0800
          Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-23 16:33 -0700
      Re: NO ONE  . ANSWERED       MY QUESTION .!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-23 15:09 -0800
        Re: NO ONE  . ANSWERED       MY QUESTION .!! Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com.INVALID> - 2018-12-24 08:33 +0100
          Re: NO ONE  . ANSWERED       MY QUESTION .!! poraty6@gmail.com - 2018-12-24 01:08 -0800
    Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!! Dave <invalid@ezample.com> - 2018-12-23 10:25 -0800

#720387 — NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

No one  COULD   answered   m y question :   
WAHT IS COMPOSING   '' CURVED SPACE ''
-------------------------------------

TIA
Y.Porat
==================


 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#720391

poraty6@gmail.com Wrote in message:
> No one  COULD   answered   m y question :   
> WAHT IS COMPOSING   '' CURVED SPACE ''
> -------------------------------------

Not understanding or refusing answers
is not the same as not receiving them.

Questions to be answered
should be put in humble politeness,
not being shouted by ALL CAPITALS.

The space, 3D or not 3D, curved or not curved, 
 is the idea of geometry of placement and motion of observable 
 objects,
based originally on human visual and tactile perception of reality.

As any complex idea,  it is composed from  simple ideas,
like idea of a point, a location, a motion, a speed, a line, a
 curve, a distance, a shape, an angle etc.

Our "natural" observed 3D space
is not more real than the flat 2D space of plane or curved 2D
 space of the object surface.

None of them is composed of any physical stuff.

But is described by these spaces can be physical.

-- 
Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer)

"Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity."
Miloš Forman


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720392 — Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

On 2018-12-23 7:53 a.m., Libor Striz wrote:
> poraty6@gmail.com Wrote in message:
>> No one  COULD   answered   m y question :
>> WAHT IS COMPOSING   '' CURVED SPACE ''
>> -------------------------------------
> 
> Not understanding or refusing answers
> is not the same as not receiving them.
> 
> Questions to be answered
> should be put in humble politeness,
> not being shouted by ALL CAPITALS.
> 
> The space, 3D or not 3D, curved or not curved,
>   is the idea of geometry of placement and motion of observable
>   objects,
> based originally on human visual and tactile perception of reality.
> 
> As any complex idea,  it is composed from  simple ideas,
> like idea of a point, a location, a motion, a speed, a line, a
>   curve, a distance, a shape, an angle etc.
> 
> Our "natural" observed 3D space
> is not more real than the flat 2D space of plane or curved 2D
>   space of the object surface.
> 
> None of them is composed of any physical stuff.
> 
> But is described by these spaces can be physical.
> 

now i see why you're not getting answered ,
you can't ask a question and then dictate how you can be answered

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720393 — Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

% <persent@gmail.com> Wrote in message:

> now i see why you're not getting answered ,
> you can't ask a question and then dictate how you can be answered
> 

I have asked any question.

-- 
Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer)

"Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity."
Miloš Forman


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720511 — Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 5:43:39 PM UTC+2, Libor Striz wrote:
> % <persent@gmail.com> Wrote in message:
> 
> > now i see why you're not getting answered ,
> > you can't ask a question and then dictate how you can be answered
> > 
> 
> I have asked any question.
> 
> -- 
> Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer)
> 
> "Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity."
> Miloš Forman
> 
> 
> ----Android NewsGroup Reader----
> http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

=============================
now Mr     Striz   
why should we walk so long around the bush
 will  lead you 
right  to the  point
=========================================================
MESS** IS THE CREATOR OF **ALL * FORCES!- INCLUDING GRAVIY !  
===========================================================
historic copyright 
Eng
Yehiel  Porat
=====================================
!!!
====
TIA
Y.P
==============

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720461 — Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 5:09:47 PM UTC+2, % wrote:
> On 2018-12-23 7:53 a.m., Libor Striz wrote:
> > poraty6@gmail.com Wrote in message:
> >> No one  COULD   answered   m y question :
> >> WAHT IS COMPOSING   '' CURVED SPACE ''
> >> -------------------------------------
> > 
> > Not understanding or refusing answers
> > is not the same as not receiving them.
> > 
> > Questions to be answered
> > should be put in humble politeness,
> > not being shouted by ALL CAPITALS.
> > 
> > The space, 3D or not 3D, curved or not curved,
> >   is the idea of geometry of placement and motion of observable
> >   objects,
> > based originally on human visual and tactile perception of reality.
> > 
> > As any complex idea,  it is composed from  simple ideas,
> > like idea of a point, a location, a motion, a speed, a line, a
> >   curve, a distance, a shape, an angle etc.
> > 
> > Our "natural" observed 3D space
> > is not more real than the flat 2D space of plane or curved 2D
> >   space of the object surface.
> > 
> > None of them is composed of any physical stuff.
> > 
> > But is described by these spaces can be physical.
> > 
> 
> now i see why you're not getting answered ,
> you can't ask a question and then dictate how you can be answered
===============
thank you !
now  I added above some  more explanations 
does it make it  clearer to you 
what  I wanted to  say (innovate ?)

TIA
Y.P
===============

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720465 — Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

On 2018-12-23 4:22 p.m., poraty6@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 5:09:47 PM UTC+2, % wrote:
>> On 2018-12-23 7:53 a.m., Libor Striz wrote:
>>> poraty6@gmail.com Wrote in message:
>>>> No one  COULD   answered   m y question :
>>>> WAHT IS COMPOSING   '' CURVED SPACE ''
>>>> -------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Not understanding or refusing answers
>>> is not the same as not receiving them.
>>>
>>> Questions to be answered
>>> should be put in humble politeness,
>>> not being shouted by ALL CAPITALS.
>>>
>>> The space, 3D or not 3D, curved or not curved,
>>>    is the idea of geometry of placement and motion of observable
>>>    objects,
>>> based originally on human visual and tactile perception of reality.
>>>
>>> As any complex idea,  it is composed from  simple ideas,
>>> like idea of a point, a location, a motion, a speed, a line, a
>>>    curve, a distance, a shape, an angle etc.
>>>
>>> Our "natural" observed 3D space
>>> is not more real than the flat 2D space of plane or curved 2D
>>>    space of the object surface.
>>>
>>> None of them is composed of any physical stuff.
>>>
>>> But is described by these spaces can be physical.
>>>
>>
>> now i see why you're not getting answered ,
>> you can't ask a question and then dictate how you can be answered
> ===============
> thank you !
> now  I added above some  more explanations
> does it make it  clearer to you
> what  I wanted to  say (innovate ?)
> 
> TIA
> Y.P
> ===============
> 
> 
> 
> 
i answered your real question already

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720460

On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 4:53:47 PM UTC+2, Libor Striz wrote:
> poraty6@gmail.com Wrote in message:
> > No one  COULD   answered   m y question :   
> > WAHT IS COMPOSING   '' CURVED SPACE ''
> > -------------------------------------
> 
> Not understanding or refusing answers
> is not the same as not receiving them.
> 
> Questions to be answered
> should be put in humble politeness,
> not being shouted by ALL CAPITALS.
> 
> The space, 3D or not 3D, curved or not curved, 
>  is the idea of geometry of placement and motion of observable 
>  objects,
> based originally on human visual and tactile perception of reality.
> 
> As any complex idea,  it is composed from  simple ideas,
> like idea of a point, a location, a motion, a speed, a line, a
>  curve, a distance, a shape, an angle etc.
> 
> Our "natural" observed 3D space
> is not more real than the flat 2D space of plane or curved 2D
>  space of the object surface.
> 
> None of them is composed of any physical stuff.
> 
> But is described by these spaces can be physical.
> =========================
thank you 
now 
it is either that I didn't explain   myself
or you didn't understand my claim 

my claim is 
that 
space is a physical   entity 
but just space if nothing else  in it
cannot Do!! anything  

IT HAS NOT ENOUGH PHYSICFAL   ENTITIES  
THAT ARE NEEDED TO MAKE A FORCE !!
THE DIMENSIINS OF FORCE ARE  
KILOGRAM METER^2 /SECOND 
nothing less than that
cannot make any force  !!
my claim is that
 if you claim that that  this  space 
can cussing any   force 
it must have the  other physical entities!!

and  indeed in reality 
if you have space ** plus mass in it**
that combination makes force (it is an observable  fact     

yet my claim is that
that  above combination ** does makes force !!

and our observations tell us 
that bet space cannot do anything 
while 
if you add to it
mass in it 
it becomes  completely **another entity 
 ANOTHER PHYSICAL ENTITY!!!
THAT  DOES MAKE FORCE !!
now the  billion   Dollar question is
why is it that
only if you add mass in it  
only then !!!it makes forces -
for instance 
if you have just space
it cannot make Magnetism  

but is you add to  space
 a mass of some iron 
**only then it cam  make magnetism 
conclusion :

it is  some  mass    in  space 
THAT**  MAKES THE ABOVE DIFFERENCE !! 
my** innovation** is 
that** mass*  is the force maker !

indeed revolutionary !
because  mass is   until now
considered as a **passive*  entity

  the first fact  '' suspicion ' for me   
  that mass can do  a   force 
was  the Faraday experiment with the ***iron**
(that has    mass  )   !!
for me it was the beginning of   a  revulsion!!
I  hope that is will be  for   others as well 

TIA
Y.P
==================               
 > 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720533

poraty6@gmail.com Wrote in message:

> thank you 
> now 
> it is either that I didn't explain   myself
> or you didn't understand my claim 

You were asking, not making claims.




-- 
Libor Striz aka Poutnik ( a pilgrim/wanderer/wayfarer)

"Humour is the only effective weapon against stupidity."
Miloš Forman


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720541

On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 9:33:21 AM UTC+2, Libor Striz wrote:
> poraty6@gmail.com Wrote in message:
> 
> > thank you 
> > now 
> > it is either that I didn't explain   myself
> > or you didn't understand my claim 
> 
> You were asking, not making claims.
> 
> =======================================
 (:-)

do you think that I  was asking because I did not know 
or did not understand  the issue  ??

it was a  way to invoke    interest  in my 
revolutionary  HISTOEIC  findings

that is   unbelievable difficult to publish 
and convince a  world of shear  block  head  parrots !!
and not  only parrots but
people who resist **any  innovation because      
 not of  honesty
but
SHAMELESS   PRIVATE *** BUSSINESS***!!!!!!!!!   

NOT MUCH  DIFFERENCE BETWEEN    NOW
AND   500 TEARS AGO  !! 

2
Anyway  for that  historic finding above
I don't need 'a  ''license from    anyone !! 
because
whether   you  like or   no 
it is my ***registered    innovation**!

why ??
BECAUS OUR DAYS   ANY  THINGIS YOU  PUBLISH SAY IN GOOGLE 
IS DEAD SAFE WRITTEN'' ON YOUR NAME !  '' 
including exact dates !
no one can steal it   from you !!!
unless you  are fabricating 'false documents 
(and even   that  you can find   in our crocks world 
of our says  ..

TIA
Y.Porat
========================  
  


 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#720418 — Re: NO ONE . ANSWERED MY QUESTION .!!

> TIA (T)hinking (I)s (A)bsent
> Y.Porat
> ==================

Shut up idiot

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web