Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #712831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 44 participants
Thread has 1403 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1403 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Fake News ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800
Re: Fake News ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-15 09:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:03 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 19:10 +0000
Re: Fake News ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-15 14:13 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 20:36 +0000
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:21 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 18:57 -0800
Re: Fake News ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 17:02 -0700
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 20:38 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-15 12:34 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:16 -0800
Kensi's idiot, dice throwing, God. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 11:21 -0800
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-16 10:34 -0500
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:40 -0700
Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-16 14:28 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-17 12:15 -0500
Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-17 12:07 -0800
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:00 -0500
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:56 -0700
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:16 -0600
You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:45 -0800
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 15:52 -0700
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:16 -0500
I'm not mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:03 -0800
Re: I'm not mainstream. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:41 -0500
" this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-20 17:22 -0800
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:16 -0500
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:57 -0600
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:02 -0500
Choose your cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:27 -0800
Re: Choose your cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:46 -0500
Re: Choose your cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:55 -0700
Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-23 14:37 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:39 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:04 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:40 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:55 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:48 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 23:55 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:18 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 22:19 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 06:24 +0000
Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-26 01:31 -0800
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:13 -0500
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-26 09:34 -0600
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 20:55 -0700
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:16 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-26 03:39 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:17 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:19 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:26 +0000
By definition, geniuses are rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: By definition, geniuses are rare. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 05:16 -0500
Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-27 06:33 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:08 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0800
Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 06:37 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 07:44 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0500
99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 07:39 -0800
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 12:00 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0700
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:37 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:36 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:35 -0500
The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 06:19 -0800
Re: The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:21 -0500
We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 08:31 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:11 -0500
Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 05:09 -0800
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:29 -0500
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 +0000
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:27 -0500
Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 13:46 -0800
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 16:41 -0600
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:28 -0500
Kensi is the KoOky one. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:28 -0800
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:33 -0500
See ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:48 -0800
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:55 -0500
I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 07:04 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:13 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:09 +0000
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:18 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 09:31 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:35 -0700
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: See ? ! "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 11:47 -0500
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: See ? ! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:10 +0000
Re: See ? ! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0600
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:44 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:49 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:54 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:02 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:10 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:22 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:43 -0700
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 21:52 -0600
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:09 -0500
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-01 11:48 -0600
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-30 10:34 -0800
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-30 15:09 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:53 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:59 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:23 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:33 -0600
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 15:54 -0500
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 18:51 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 13:54 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 14:57 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:26 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:45 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:17 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:43 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 17:40 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:15 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:17 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 07:46 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 00:55 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:49 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:50 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:19 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:09 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:48 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:48 -0700
Einstein was right. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 10:57 -0800
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:32 +0000
72 robotic alien virgins. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:03 +0000
There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 20:32 -0800
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:46 +0000
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:11 -0500
Kenzi's SciFi cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 12:02 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-23 10:08 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:51 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:56 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:47 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:53 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:57 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:23 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:40 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:48 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:47 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:01 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:41 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 16:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:46 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:42 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:44 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 09:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:14 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:26 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad813b404@gmail.invallid> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:05 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:21 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:26 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:31 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:38 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 20:46 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:23 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-25 00:46 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:49 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 23:23 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:07 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:17 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 20:25 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 17:50 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:55 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 01:44 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:51 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:05 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:20 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 22:37 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:43 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 23:33 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:37 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:16 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:28 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 16:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:46 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:12 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-11-25 06:58 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 09:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:49 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:59 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:16 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:14 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:29 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 20:05 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 06:00 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:48 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:59 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:45 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 23:04 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 16:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:29 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:31 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:53 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:48 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:21 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:51 -0800
qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 04:41 -0800
Re: qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:44 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:10 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:08 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:07 -0500
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:29 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:34 -0700
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0500
Kooky like Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:35 -0800
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:14 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-23 01:36 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:47 -0700
I am crazy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 20:17 -0800
Re: I am crazy. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:30 -0500
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:55 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:24 -0500
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:05 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 14:27 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:29 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:30 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:07 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:02 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:33 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 19:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:30 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:04 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:55 +0000
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:38 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:37 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:30 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:32 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:48 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:37 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:43 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:38 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 15:29 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:47 +0000
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 02:16 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:39 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 18:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:01 -0500
When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:06 -0800
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:21 -0500
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-19 10:53 -0600
The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 13:07 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 12:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:23 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 12:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 17:00 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:38 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:39 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 06:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 13:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 12:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:01 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-22 14:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-20 20:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-20 13:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 18:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-20 18:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 19:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:13 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-20 23:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-21 05:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 23:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 14:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 15:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 22:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 23:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:27 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 22:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:42 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 18:52 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 18:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 00:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 09:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 17:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:02 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-23 16:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:43 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:02 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:08 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:52 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 18:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 21:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 22:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 07:08 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 11:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-26 20:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 07:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 07:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:21 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 03:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 07:47 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 12:40 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 19:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 21:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:20 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 22:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 21:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 21:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 09:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 10:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 08:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:34 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:16 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:04 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:05 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 08:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 14:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:48 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 09:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 15:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2018-11-29 17:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:01 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 11:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 20:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 12:07 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 20:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 00:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 13:09 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 11:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 21:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 02:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 10:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 17:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:46 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:40 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:48 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 15:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 15:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 19:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 20:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 21:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 10:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 23:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-28 12:27 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:21 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:51 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:24 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-01 13:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 13:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:10 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:57 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:22 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 00:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:34 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:04 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 13:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 14:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:55 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:14 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 10:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:03 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 09:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 11:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:03 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:13 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 08:14 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:28 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 20:42 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-30 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:53 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 10:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 11:58 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:16 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 11:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 07:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 08:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:38 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-12-01 18:49 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 07:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 09:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 13:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 12:37 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 16:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:25 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:19 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 12:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 13:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 11:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 07:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 23:36 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:32 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 20:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:14 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 14:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:28 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:11 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:39 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:37 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:26 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 11:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 12:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. AOC <AOC@mineshot.org> - 2018-11-28 16:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500
Page 35 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 33 34 [35] 36 37 … 50 Next page →
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 07:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bq04ol.348.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716373 |
On 2018-12-03 7:34 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/3/2018 9:13 AM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-02 7:50 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/2/2018 8:24 PM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-02 6:22 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>>> On 12/2/2018 7:41 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-02 5:38 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/2/2018 5:56 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-02 3:41 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/1/2018 10:49 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>>>>> posts by >>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <ptt4as$es6$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says... >>>>>>>>>> @fart@On 11/30/2018 7:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> On 11/30/2018 5:40 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>> when reading posts by >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Checkmate! In article <ptqgbn$nk0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂOn 11/29/2018 8:06 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ>> gerg can make escargot >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ> I don't want to touch anything he touches. >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂYou're supposed to feed grape leaves to the >>>>>>>>>> snails for a week to >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> clean >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ'em out and then put 'em in water with a little >>>>>>>>>> salt and vinegar >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> in it >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂand they shit it all out. Then they're clean >>>>>>>>>> and ready to >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> cook. Maybe >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂthat would work for Gerg. >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> My Flip ex-wife and her mom offered me some snails >>>>>>>>>> once. I thought they >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> were talking about escargo, which I've been mildly >>>>>>>>>> tempted to try. >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> Actually, _clean_ fully purged snails can be very >>>>>>>>>> tasty. Especially when >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> they are stuffed in mushroom caps with a nice garlic, >>>>>>>>>> shallot, parsley, >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> white wine, butter and olive oil based sauce. Salted >>>>>>>>>> and peppered to taste. >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Then >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> I found out the were some kind of snails out of a >>>>>>>>>> river, and I passed. >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> No telling what kind of parasites they might have >>>>>>>>>> been harboring. Asians >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> will eat anything that moves. >>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> Never even think of eating snails from some van down >>>>>>>>>> by the river. Heck, >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> even crawfish from rivers are shi% compared to ones >>>>>>>>>> that come out a nice >>>>>>>>>> @fart@^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>> @fart@I need to rephrase here. Crawfish out of nasty mud >>>>>>>>>> generally do not >>>>>>>>>> @fart@taste as good as ones caught from a nice alpine lake. >>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> lake, like Lake Tahoe: >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>> @fart@> https://youtu.be/t3_F_7lNJ5I >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've never eaten one, but I imagine they taste like a poor >>>>>>>>>> man's lobster >>>>>>>>>> or shrimp. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Pretty close. :^) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> tahoe is too cold they like warm water >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Real lobsters like cold water. >>>>>>> >>>>>> they like salt in it too >>>>> >>>>> The lobsters are moving into deeper water where it's still cold so >>>>> they're starting to build boats that can handle the big waves and >>>>> go much faster: >>>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVA4qi1kx8g >>>>> >>>> they're moving to hide from the lion fish >>> >>> I think lion fish stop at North Carolina. They like living near >>> coral reefs and there aren't any near here because it's too cold. >>> >> doesn't the great barrier reef have winter > > Not much. It's a coconut and palm tree area. > i found a map http://lionfishnickgrantdrewadam.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/7/2/26723055/3660946_orig.png
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 10:17 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pu3hdk$1i36$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716375 |
On 12/3/2018 9:39 AM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-03 7:34 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: >> On 12/3/2018 9:13 AM, % wrote: >>> On 2018-12-02 7:50 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>> On 12/2/2018 8:24 PM, % wrote: >>>>> On 2018-12-02 6:22 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>> On 12/2/2018 7:41 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>> On 2018-12-02 5:38 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/2/2018 5:56 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-02 3:41 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 12/1/2018 10:49 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <ptt4as$es6$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says... >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@On 11/30/2018 7:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> On 11/30/2018 5:40 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>> when reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Checkmate! In article <ptqgbn$nk0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂOn 11/29/2018 8:06 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ>> gerg can make escargot >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ> I don't want to touch anything he touches. >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂYou're supposed to feed grape leaves to the >>>>>>>>>>> snails for a week to >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> clean >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ'em out and then put 'em in water with a >>>>>>>>>>> little salt and vinegar >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> in it >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂand they shit it all out. Then they're clean >>>>>>>>>>> and ready to >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> cook. Maybe >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂthat would work for Gerg. >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> My Flip ex-wife and her mom offered me some snails >>>>>>>>>>> once. I thought they >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> were talking about escargo, which I've been mildly >>>>>>>>>>> tempted to try. >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> Actually, _clean_ fully purged snails can be very >>>>>>>>>>> tasty. Especially when >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> they are stuffed in mushroom caps with a nice garlic, >>>>>>>>>>> shallot, parsley, >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> white wine, butter and olive oil based sauce. Salted >>>>>>>>>>> and peppered to taste. >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Then >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> I found out the were some kind of snails out of a >>>>>>>>>>> river, and I passed. >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> No telling what kind of parasites they might have >>>>>>>>>>> been harboring. Asians >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> will eat anything that moves. >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> Never even think of eating snails from some van down >>>>>>>>>>> by the river. Heck, >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> even crawfish from rivers are shi% compared to ones >>>>>>>>>>> that come out a nice >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@I need to rephrase here. Crawfish out of nasty mud >>>>>>>>>>> generally do not >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@taste as good as ones caught from a nice alpine lake. >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> lake, like Lake Tahoe: >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> https://youtu.be/t3_F_7lNJ5I >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've never eaten one, but I imagine they taste like a poor >>>>>>>>>>> man's lobster >>>>>>>>>>> or shrimp. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Pretty close. :^) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> tahoe is too cold they like warm water >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Real lobsters like cold water. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> they like salt in it too >>>>>> >>>>>> The lobsters are moving into deeper water where it's still cold so >>>>>> they're starting to build boats that can handle the big waves and >>>>>> go much faster: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVA4qi1kx8g >>>>>> >>>>> they're moving to hide from the lion fish >>>> >>>> I think lion fish stop at North Carolina. They like living near >>>> coral reefs and there aren't any near here because it's too cold. >>>> >>> doesn't the great barrier reef have winter >> >> Not much. It's a coconut and palm tree area. >> > i found a map > > http://lionfishnickgrantdrewadam.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/7/2/26723055/3660946_orig.png Yeah. They found some babies in Long Island sound. The water there is shallow and it can get warm enough in the summer but the winter freezes them so they never grow up. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 08:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bq083i.dmo.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716387 |
On 2018-12-03 8:17 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 12/3/2018 9:39 AM, % wrote: >> On 2018-12-03 7:34 a.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>> On 12/3/2018 9:13 AM, % wrote: >>>> On 2018-12-02 7:50 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>>> On 12/2/2018 8:24 PM, % wrote: >>>>>> On 2018-12-02 6:22 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>> On 12/2/2018 7:41 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2018-12-02 5:38 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 12/2/2018 5:56 PM, % wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-12-02 3:41 p.m., Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 12/1/2018 10:49 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>>>>>>> reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <ptt4as$es6$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says... >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@On 11/30/2018 7:48 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> On 11/30/2018 5:40 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>>>>>>> when reading posts by >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Checkmate! In article <ptqgbn$nk0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂOn 11/29/2018 8:06 PM, Janithor wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ>> gerg can make escargot >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ> I don't want to touch anything he touches. >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂYou're supposed to feed grape leaves to the >>>>>>>>>>>> snails for a week to >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> clean >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂ'em out and then put 'em in water with a >>>>>>>>>>>> little salt and vinegar >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> in it >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂand they shit it all out. Then they're clean >>>>>>>>>>>> and ready to >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> cook. Maybe >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> ÂÂÂÂÂÂthat would work for Gerg. >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> My Flip ex-wife and her mom offered me some snails >>>>>>>>>>>> once. I thought they >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> were talking about escargo, which I've been mildly >>>>>>>>>>>> tempted to try. >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> Actually, _clean_ fully purged snails can be very >>>>>>>>>>>> tasty. Especially when >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> they are stuffed in mushroom caps with a nice >>>>>>>>>>>> garlic, shallot, parsley, >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> white wine, butter and olive oil based sauce. Salted >>>>>>>>>>>> and peppered to taste. >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> Then >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> I found out the were some kind of snails out of a >>>>>>>>>>>> river, and I passed. >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> No telling what kind of parasites they might have >>>>>>>>>>>> been harboring. Asians >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> will eat anything that moves. >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@>> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> Never even think of eating snails from some van down >>>>>>>>>>>> by the river. Heck, >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> even crawfish from rivers are shi% compared to ones >>>>>>>>>>>> that come out a nice >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@I need to rephrase here. Crawfish out of nasty mud >>>>>>>>>>>> generally do not >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@taste as good as ones caught from a nice alpine lake. >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@ >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> lake, like Lake Tahoe: >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> >>>>>>>>>>>> @fart@> https://youtu.be/t3_F_7lNJ5I >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've never eaten one, but I imagine they taste like a poor >>>>>>>>>>>> man's lobster >>>>>>>>>>>> or shrimp. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Pretty close. :^) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> tahoe is too cold they like warm water >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Real lobsters like cold water. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> they like salt in it too >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The lobsters are moving into deeper water where it's still cold >>>>>>> so they're starting to build boats that can handle the big waves >>>>>>> and go much faster: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVA4qi1kx8g >>>>>>> >>>>>> they're moving to hide from the lion fish >>>>> >>>>> I think lion fish stop at North Carolina. They like living near >>>>> coral reefs and there aren't any near here because it's too cold. >>>>> >>>> doesn't the great barrier reef have winter >>> >>> Not much. It's a coconut and palm tree area. >>> >> i found a map >> >> http://lionfishnickgrantdrewadam.weebly.com/uploads/2/6/7/2/26723055/3660946_orig.png > > > Yeah. They found some babies in Long Island sound. The water there is > shallow and it can get warm enough in the summer but the winter freezes > them so they never grow up. > so they become usenetters then
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 23:53 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <ptqfoe$mnq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715571 |
On 11/29/2018 10:45 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <ptnmv1$4is$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >> On 11/28/2018 9:47 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <ptnajd$1j82$2@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>> >>>> On 11/28/2018 6:50 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <ptmft8$1trl$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 11/28/2018 11:09 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <ptmdku$1pgg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>>> On 11/28/2018 10:39 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <ptm2ok$12u3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>>>>>> On 11/28/2018 3:34 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central America. >>>>>>>>>>>> But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project Veritas(<snicker>)'s faked >>>>>>>>>>>> videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and other miscellaneous propaganda. >>>>>>>>>>> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> O'Keefe hires his own actors with money that comes from "special places" >>>>>>>>>> so he can pay the fines and settlements after he gets convicted for >>>>>>>>>> doing illegal fake stuff as seen on Faux and Breitbart to make people >>>>>>>>>> mad so that they demand that ACORN be defunded many many many times. >>>>>>>>>> Also, Planned Parenthood and general democrat stuff like when Rutgers >>>>>>>>>> sells Lucky Charms to students at the cafeteria for breakfast. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So the invasion is real and you never served. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Go ahead, Mr. fake soldier, tell me what kind of soap is used to clean >>>>>>>> powder residue and dirt out of M-14s and M-16s. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What does that have to do with the browns invading? >>>>>> >>>>>> Real soldiers know how to clean a rifle, no matter how dirty it gets, >>>>>> Mr. Fake Soldier. >>>>> >>>>> Who cares? We are not discussing rifles. >>>> >>>> Fake soldier don't know rifle cleaning. >>> >>> How long did it take you to google it? >> >> Didn't have to google it. Learned rifle cleaning when I was a young >> recruit back when you were a grammar school booger eating nosepicker. >> Learnt gun cleaning and inspecting and basic shooting. Then, after we >> had all the basic skills, we spent a week at the range (we had to march >> double time 'bout 5 miles to get there) where I got my expert badge (did >> I mention that I even got the man sized targets at 500 meters with open >> sights?). Then we had to clean our rifles really good so they'd be in >> great shape for fighting the commies. No patch with Hoppe's #9 for a >> quick rub down. Nope. Good scrub down with special gun soap that real >> soldiers used to clean their guns in all the wars after about 1890. Any >> real Army or Marine soldier ought to remember what guns got cleaned >> with. Air Force guys prolly had immigrant servants cleaning their guns >> because they're a dainty bunch who don't do rain, mud, sand or snow or >> real work to fight off commie hordes. >> >> See if you can google it, Mr. Fake GI. Maybe you can find some Army guy >> telling a gun cleaning story. > > In boot camp, we used a cleaning oil in the cleaning kits they gave us. > It smelled like Outers or Hoppes, but came in an OD Government squeezy > can. We never used soap. Took 3 55 gallon drums heated to boiling. First one got Fel's Naptha added, the other two were for rinsing. Barrels got hung on hooks. Small parts went into mesh bags. Stuff soaked for about 5 minutes. Then everything got dried and oiled while it was still hot. All the crud in the gas cylinder just wiped right off, a pipe cleaner got everything left in the gas port and the barrel gumbies went away. Nowadays there are likely special amazing gun cleaning foaming bubbles cleaners like what you spray on yore wheels, laser blasters ultrasonic cleaners or something like that but back in the old days, it was soap and elbow grease. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 20:19 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <ptnib1$1tp0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715222 |
On 11/28/2018 5:50 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <ptmft8$1trl$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >> >> On 11/28/2018 11:09 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <ptmdku$1pgg$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>> On 11/28/2018 10:39 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <ptm2ok$12u3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>>>> On 11/28/2018 3:34 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central America. >>>>>>>> But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project Veritas(<snicker>)'s faked >>>>>>>> videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and other miscellaneous propaganda. >>>>>>> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? >>>>>> >>>>>> O'Keefe hires his own actors with money that comes from "special places" >>>>>> so he can pay the fines and settlements after he gets convicted for >>>>>> doing illegal fake stuff as seen on Faux and Breitbart to make people >>>>>> mad so that they demand that ACORN be defunded many many many times. >>>>>> Also, Planned Parenthood and general democrat stuff like when Rutgers >>>>>> sells Lucky Charms to students at the cafeteria for breakfast. >>>>> >>>>> So the invasion is real and you never served. >>>> >>>> Go ahead, Mr. fake soldier, tell me what kind of soap is used to clean >>>> powder residue and dirt out of M-14s and M-16s. >>> >>> What does that have to do with the browns invading? >> >> Real soldiers know how to clean a rifle, no matter how dirty it gets, >> Mr. Fake Soldier. > > Who cares? We are not discussing rifles. > what kind of soap do you use? Ivory ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 12:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <qeALD.519166$HK2.498362@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #715062 |
On 2018-11-28 3:34 a.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>> .?'?¯)>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>> your kids, >>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>> .?'?¯)>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>> .?'?¯)>> >>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the Fox >>> Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)---------- >>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the times >>> we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy (but >>> Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it should >>> never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever means) for the >>> purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that contracting >>> states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that creates an offence >>> or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So by definition refugees >>> can never be acting ?illegally? merely by .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** >>> [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US is one of .?'?¯)a handful of >>> countries that never signed the treaty; but they did say they >>> .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention anyway. >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children-is- >> an-act- >>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>> support it. >>> >>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to citizenship >>> in this sovereign nation >> >> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central America. >> But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project Veritas(<snicker>)'s faked >> videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and other miscellaneous propaganda. > > Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? Boy am I glad I killfiled that imbecile. These leftists will claim that everything from Project Veritas' videos to Jim Acosta pushing an aide's arm down are "doctored." In other words, anything which reveals them to be the scum that they are must not be authentic. No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to prove what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure scum. -- SilverSlimer Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 12:21 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ |
| Message-ID | <4qWdnQA8CvlcQWPGnZ2dnUU7-UPNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #715153 |
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 12:27:53 -0500, LO AND BEHOLD; The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <qeALD.519166$HK2.498362@fx08.iad>: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On 2018-11-28 3:34 a.m., Skeeter wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ says... ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, 💩 wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 💩! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ @gmail.invalid says... .?'?¯) .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: .?'?¯) .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: .?'?¯)> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)>>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: .?'?¯)>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from your kids, ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ separation policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)>>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ parents get arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ kids? .?'?¯)> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. .?'?¯)> .?'?¯)> We all ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. That .?'?¯)> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? .?'?¯)> .?'?¯)>>> ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for criminals ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? .?'?¯)>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, without ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)>>any separations. .?'?¯)> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ If so, on what basis do you claim that the .?'?¯)> new policy is ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ wrong? .?'?¯) .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ some of the Fox Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. .?'?¯) ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ read this .?'?¯)stuff: .?'?¯) .?'?¯)---------- .?'?¯)Article 31 of ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states from ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also says ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the times we ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ live in in guess. .?'?¯) .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ the risk of being nerdy (but Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ convention states that it should never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ country (by whatever means) for the purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ And it requires that contracting states do not bring forth any ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)legislation that creates an offence or otherwise criminalises ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ such entry. .?'?¯)***So by definition refugees can never be acting ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ?illegally? merely by .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** [emphasis mine] Now ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ as it happens, the US is one of .?'?¯)a handful of countries that never ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ signed the treaty; but they did say they .?'?¯)would agree to adhere ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to the convention anyway. .?'?¯) ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children-i ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ s- ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ an-act- ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ .?'?¯) .?'?¯)Separating children from their ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ parents is indeed a form of terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ a society that has lost its moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ into such darkness that it demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ moral outrage and a collective resistance aimed at eliminating the ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)narratives, power relations and values that support it. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ .?'?¯)---------- .?'?¯) .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ their moral compass and descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ demands both the loudest forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ resistance aimed at eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ and values that support it. Anyone who uses children as human shields ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ or a free pass to citizenship in this sovereign nation ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ America. But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Veritas(<💩snickerTurd💩>)'s faked videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ other miscellaneous propaganda. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Boy am I glad I killfiled that imbecile. ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ These leftists will claim that everything from Project Veritas' videos ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ to Jim Acosta pushing an aide's arm down are "doctored." In other ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ words, anything which reveals them to be the scum that they are must ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ not be authentic. No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ prove what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ scum. do they pay pron stars $130,000 to touch their little tiny mushroom bits, or something? -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 20:17 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6942hFepemU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #715153 |
On 11/28/18 10:27 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On 2018-11-28 3:34 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >> In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>> snowflakes, >>>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>>> your kids, >>>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>>> .?'?¯)>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the Fox >>>> Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)---------- >>>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the times >>>> we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy (but >>>> Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it should >>>> never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever means) for >>>> the >>>> purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that contracting >>>> states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that creates an offence >>>> or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So by definition >>>> refugees >>>> can never be acting ?illegally? merely by .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** >>>> [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US is one of .?'?¯)a handful of >>>> countries that never signed the treaty; but they did say they >>>> .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention anyway. >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children-is- >>>> >>> an-act- >>>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>>> support it. >>>> >>>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to citizenship >>>> in this sovereign nation >>> >>> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central >>> America. >>> But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project Veritas(<snicker>)'s >>> faked >>> videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and other miscellaneous >>> propaganda. >> >> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? > > Boy am I glad I killfiled that imbecile. > > These leftists will claim that everything from Project Veritas' videos > to Jim Acosta pushing an aide's arm down are "doctored." The video clearly was doctored by Infowars and then used by the White House... and done so in an effort to bypass the First Amendment. But you do not care one whit about morality or the Constitution. > In other words, > anything which reveals them to be the scum that they are must not be > authentic. Doctored videos are NOT authentic... has nothing to do with what you WANT them to show. > No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to prove > what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure scum. You accept doctored videos as "evidence". Oy. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 08:46 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3669b7db29692fb81ef@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #715270 |
In article <g6942hFepemU6@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... > >On 11/28/18 10:27 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On 2018-11-28 3:34 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>> snowflakes, >>>>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>>>> your kids, >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>>>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>>>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>>>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>>>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>>>> .?'?¯)>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>>>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>>>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the Fox >>>>> Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>>>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)---------- >>>>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>>>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>>>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the times >>>>> we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy (but >>>>> Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it should >>>>> never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever means) for >>>>> the >>>>> purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that contracting >>>>> states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that creates an offence >>>>> or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So by definition >>>>> refugees >>>>> can never be acting ?illegally? merely by .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** >>>>> [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US is one of .?'?¯)a handful of >>>>> countries that never signed the treaty; but they did say they >>>>> .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention anyway. >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children-is- >>>>> >>>> an-act- >>>>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>>>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>>>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>>>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>>>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>>>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>>>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>>>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>>>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>>>> support it. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to citizenship >>>>> in this sovereign nation >>>> >>>> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central >>>> America. >>>> But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project Veritas(<snicker>)'s >>>> faked >>>> videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and other miscellaneous >>>> propaganda. >>> >>> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? >> >> Boy am I glad I killfiled that imbecile. >> >> These leftists will claim that everything from Project Veritas' videos >> to Jim Acosta pushing an aide's arm down are "doctored." > >The video clearly was doctored by Infowars and then used by the White >House... and done so in an effort to bypass the First Amendment. > >But you do not care one whit about morality or the Constitution. Nothing was doctored you foil hat wearing moron. > >> In other words, >> anything which reveals them to be the scum that they are must not be >> authentic. > >Doctored videos are NOT authentic... has nothing to do with what you >WANT them to show. Prove it's doctored. Betcha can't. > >> No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to prove >> what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure scum. > >You accept doctored videos as "evidence". Oy. Proof?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 13:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <3ZVLD.976457$LK2.709046@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #715357 |
On 2018-11-29 10:46 a.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <g6942hFepemU6@mid.individual.net>, > usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >> >> On 11/28/18 10:27 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> On 2018-11-28 3:34 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>> Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>>>>> your kids, >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>>>>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>>>>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>>>>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>>>>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>>>>> .?'?¯)>> >>>>>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>>>>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>>>>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the Fox >>>>>> Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>>>>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)---------- >>>>>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>>>>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>>>>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the times >>>>>> we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy (but >>>>>> Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it should >>>>>> never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever means) for >>>>>> the >>>>>> purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that contracting >>>>>> states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that creates an offence >>>>>> or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So by definition >>>>>> refugees >>>>>> can never be acting ?illegally? merely by .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** >>>>>> [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US is one of .?'?¯)a handful of >>>>>> countries that never signed the treaty; but they did say they >>>>>> .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention anyway. >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children-is- >>>>>> >>>>> an-act- >>>>>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>>>>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>>>>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>>>>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>>>>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>>>>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>>>>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>>>>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>>>>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>>>>> support it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to citizenship >>>>>> in this sovereign nation >>>>> >>>>> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central >>>>> America. >>>>> But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project Veritas(<snicker>)'s >>>>> faked >>>>> videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and other miscellaneous >>>>> propaganda. >>>> >>>> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? >>> >>> Boy am I glad I killfiled that imbecile. >>> >>> These leftists will claim that everything from Project Veritas' videos >>> to Jim Acosta pushing an aide's arm down are "doctored." >> >> The video clearly was doctored by Infowars and then used by the White >> House... and done so in an effort to bypass the First Amendment. >> >> But you do not care one whit about morality or the Constitution. > > Nothing was doctored you foil hat wearing moron. Exactly. However, CNN and the other liars _said_ that it was doctored without showing or explaining how and Snit accepts anything the leftist media says as gospel. They also told him that right-leaning media lies without explaining how so he's been trained to question _anything_ coming from a right-leaning source like the good dog that he is. In other words, proof that the Democrats are pure evil is fake because the Democrats who are being exposed said that it is. >>> In other words, >>> anything which reveals them to be the scum that they are must not be >>> authentic. >> >> Doctored videos are NOT authentic... has nothing to do with what you >> WANT them to show. > > Prove it's doctored. Betcha can't. The Linux advocates and Wintrolls here have been waiting for Snit to prove that he has a functional brain since he emerged and he hasn't yet so I doubt that we should expect anything else out of him. >>> No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to prove >>> what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure scum. >> >> You accept doctored videos as "evidence". Oy. > > Proof? A statement from Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo who were exposed as liars. -- SilverSlimer Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 18:56 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366a469e114f69a9227@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #715419 |
In article <3ZVLD.976457$LK2.709046@fx36.iad>, silver@slim.er says... > >On 2018-11-29 10:46 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >> In article <g6942hFepemU6@mid.individual.net>, >> usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >>> >>> On 11/28/18 10:27 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On 2018-11-28 3:34 a.m., Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>> Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>>>>>> your kids, >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>>>>>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>>>>>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>>>>>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>>>>>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>>>>>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>>>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>>>>>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the Fox >>>>>>> Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>>>>>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)---------- >>>>>>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>>>>>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>>>>>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the times >>>>>>> we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy (but >>>>>>> Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it should >>>>>>> never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever means) for >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that contracting >>>>>>> states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that creates an offence >>>>>>> or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So by definition >>>>>>> refugees >>>>>>> can never be acting ?illegally? merely by .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** >>>>>>> [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US is one of .?'?¯)a handful of >>>>>>> countries that never signed the treaty; but they did say they >>>>>>> .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention anyway. >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children-is- >>>>>>> >>>>>> an-act- >>>>>>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>>>>>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>>>>>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>>>>>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>>>>>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>>>>>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>>>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>>>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>>>>>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>>>>>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>>>>>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>>>>>> support it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to citizenship >>>>>>> in this sovereign nation >>>>>> >>>>>> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central >>>>>> America. >>>>>> But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project Veritas(<snicker>)'s >>>>>> faked >>>>>> videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and other miscellaneous >>>>>> propaganda. >>>>> >>>>> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? >>>> >>>> Boy am I glad I killfiled that imbecile. >>>> >>>> These leftists will claim that everything from Project Veritas' videos >>>> to Jim Acosta pushing an aide's arm down are "doctored." >>> >>> The video clearly was doctored by Infowars and then used by the White >>> House... and done so in an effort to bypass the First Amendment. >>> >>> But you do not care one whit about morality or the Constitution. >> >> Nothing was doctored you foil hat wearing moron. > >Exactly. However, CNN and the other liars _said_ that it was doctored >without showing or explaining how and Snit accepts anything the leftist >media says as gospel. They also told him that right-leaning media lies >without explaining how so he's been trained to question _anything_ >coming from a right-leaning source like the good dog that he is. In >other words, proof that the Democrats are pure evil is fake because the >Democrats who are being exposed said that it is. > >>>> In other words, >>>> anything which reveals them to be the scum that they are must not be >>>> authentic. >>> >>> Doctored videos are NOT authentic... has nothing to do with what you >>> WANT them to show. >> >> Prove it's doctored. Betcha can't. > >The Linux advocates and Wintrolls here have been waiting for Snit to >prove that he has a functional brain since he emerged and he hasn't yet >so I doubt that we should expect anything else out of him. > >>>> No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to prove >>>> what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure scum. >>> >>> You accept doctored videos as "evidence". Oy. >> >> Proof? > >A statement from Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo who were exposed as liars. I watched a little CNN catch up and notice the responses I get here are carbon copies of the remarks said on CNN.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 21:08 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <g6efqnFk215U3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #715419 |
On 11/29/18 11:11 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: ... >>> But you do not care one whit about morality or the Constitution. >> >> Nothing was doctored you foil hat wearing moron. > > Exactly. However, CNN and the other liars _said_ that it was doctored > without showing or explaining how and Snit accepts anything the leftist > media says as gospel. Note how you lie to try to change the topic from the absolute fact Infowars was busted forging a video that the Trump White House used to TRY to deny first amendment rights to a reporter. Oh, and unlike you I did not just read stuff and then decide what to believe. I used the original video and the doctored Infowars ones to compare... and sure enough the frame-by-frame reports were accurate. It was undoubtedly doctored. > They also told him that right-leaning media lies > without explaining how so he's been trained to question _anything_ > coming from a right-leaning source like the good dog that he is. Unlike you I do more research. Here is some: https://www.icloud.com/pages/0YGbjCQ0c-dkjGjDCRadfLEeQ#Fox_News > In > other words, proof that the Democrats are pure evil is fake because the > Democrats who are being exposed said that it is. Very emotional of you. You use emotion to attack those who use reason, logic, and evidence. >>>> In other words, >>>> anything which reveals them to be the scum that they are must not be >>>> authentic. >>> >>> Doctored videos are NOT authentic... has nothing to do with what you >>> WANT them to show. >> >> Prove it's doctored. Betcha can't. > > The Linux advocates and Wintrolls here have been waiting for Snit to > prove that he has a functional brain since he emerged and he hasn't yet > so I doubt that we should expect anything else out of him. See: more emotional whining from you. You have no argument to make. >>>> No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to prove >>>> what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure scum. >>> >>> You accept doctored videos as "evidence". Oy. >> >> Proof? > > A statement from Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo who were exposed as liars. Frame-by-frame analysis done by multiple sources. But you buy the lies based on your emotions... just as you deny man-made global climate change because the science is too confusing for you and your religion of worshiping the rich tells you not to. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 08:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366c59eaa4057eae279@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #715845 |
In article <g6efqnFk215U3@mid.individual.net>, usenet@gallopinginsanity.com says... >Very emotional of you. You use emotion to attack those who use reason, >logic, and evidence. > Who was it that said I am more concerned with the moral issue rather than the legal issue? Why that was you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 08:26 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <jjtvvdhq957rcqpr90gv5li21oci7h7rs6@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #715153 |
SilverSlimer wrote: >These leftists will claim that everything from Project Veritas' videos >to Jim Acosta pushing an aide's arm down are "doctored." I won't claim those things. You are wrong, again. > (snip lies) >No amount of irrefutable evidence is ever enough to prove >what the intelligent world already knows: that leftists are pure scum. What Slimer claims is exactly 180 degrees from reality, like most right-wing propaganda. -- "[Android] is not a win for Linux." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 06:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <pto28q$v5e$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #715062 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:34:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> by Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>> snowflakes, >>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>> .?'?¯)>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>> your kids, >>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>> .?'?¯)>>> >>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>> .?'?¯)>> >>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>> .?'?¯)> >>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the >>> Fox Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)---------- >>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the >>> times we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy >>> (but Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it >>> should never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever >>> means) for the purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that >>> contracting states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that >>> creates an offence or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So >>> by definition refugees can never be acting ?illegally? merely by >>> .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US >>> is one of .?'?¯)a handful of countries that never signed the treaty; >>> but they did say they .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention >>> anyway. >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children- is- >>an-act- >>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>> .?'?¯) >>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>> support it. >>> >>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to >>> citizenship in this sovereign nation >> >>Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central >>America. But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project >>Veritas(<snicker>)'s faked videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and >>other miscellaneous propaganda. > > Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? Nothing you see on Fox can be trusted. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3669b908466cdbbf1f7@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #715299 |
In article <pto28q$v5e$13@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:34:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> by Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>> snowflakes, >>>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>>> your kids, >>>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>>> .?'?¯)>> >>>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>>> .?'?¯)> >>>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the >>>> Fox Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)---------- >>>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the >>>> times we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy >>>> (but Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it >>>> should never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever >>>> means) for the purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that >>>> contracting states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that >>>> creates an offence or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So >>>> by definition refugees can never be acting ?illegally? merely by >>>> .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US >>>> is one of .?'?¯)a handful of countries that never signed the treaty; >>>> but they did say they .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention >>>> anyway. >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children- >is- >>>an-act- >>>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>>> .?'?¯) >>>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>>> support it. >>>> >>>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to >>>> citizenship in this sovereign nation >>> >>>Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central >>>America. But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project >>>Veritas(<snicker>)'s faked videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and >>>other miscellaneous propaganda. >> >> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? > >Nothing you see on Fox can be trusted. You didn't answer the question.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 13:12 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <y_VLD.976458$LK2.252218@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #715366 |
On 2018-11-29 10:51 a.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <pto28q$v5e$13@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:34:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <ptlggm$v5e$7@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 03:52:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <ptlc4u$v5e$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>> snowflakes, >>>>> melt! .?'?¯)On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 08:30:13 -0600, chrisv wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)> kensi wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>On 11/27/2018 9:16 AM, chrisv wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> kensi wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>>> If you don't want to be arrested, and thus separated from >>>>> your kids, >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>>> You aren't seriously suggesting that the family separation >>>>> policy .?'?¯)>>>> constitutes the moral *high* ground?! >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What happens to American families, when the parents get >>>>> arrested? Do .?'?¯)>>> they not get separated from their kids? >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)> Note: No response. >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)> We all understand that it's "sad" when families are separated. >>>>> That .?'?¯)> doesn't make it the wrong thing to do, does it? >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>> What are we supposed to do, have comfy little apartments for >>>>> criminals .?'?¯)>>> to live with their families? >>>>> .?'?¯)>> >>>>> .?'?¯)>>No, we're supposed to do what we've always done: deport them, >>>>> without .?'?¯)>>any separations. >>>>> .?'?¯)> >>>>> .?'?¯)> Have we "always" done that? If so, on what basis do you claim >>>>> that the .?'?¯)> new policy is wrong? >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Aww shit kensi, looks like chrisv's been guzzling some of the >>>>> Fox Kool-Ade .?'?¯)and is going kooky. >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Meanwhile, all kooks who agree with Trump's evil policy should >>>>> read this .?'?¯)stuff: >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)---------- >>>>> .?'?¯)Article 31 of the 1951 convention specifically prohibits states >>>>> from .?'?¯)designating asylum seekers as ?illegal?. Mind you, it also >>>>> says you have .?'?¯)to keep families together, so that?s just the >>>>> times we live in in guess. .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯) It?s not even a misdemeanour. At the risk of being nerdy >>>>> (but Jean .?'?¯)knows what I?m like) the convention states that it >>>>> should never be an .?'?¯)offence to enter a country (by whatever >>>>> means) for the purposes of seeking .?'?¯)asylum. And it requires that >>>>> contracting states do not bring forth any .?'?¯)legislation that >>>>> creates an offence or otherwise criminalises such entry. .?'?¯)***So >>>>> by definition refugees can never be acting ?illegally? merely by >>>>> .?'?¯)crossing a border.*** [emphasis mine] Now as it happens, the US >>>>> is one of .?'?¯)a handful of countries that never signed the treaty; >>>>> but they did say they .?'?¯)would agree to adhere to the convention >>>>> anyway. >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/06/20/trumps-war-on-children- >> is- >>>> an-act- >>>>> .?'?¯)of-state-terrorism/ >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Separating children from their parents is indeed a form of >>>>> terrorism and .?'?¯)it points not only to a society that has lost its >>>>> moral compass, but has .?'?¯)also descended into such darkness that it >>>>> demands both the loudest forms .?'?¯)of moral outrage and a collective >>>>> resistance aimed at eliminating the .?'?¯)narratives, power relations >>>>> and values that support it. .?'?¯)---------- >>>>> .?'?¯) >>>>> .?'?¯)Anyone who supports this has also lost their moral compass and >>>>> descended .?'?¯)into such darkness that it demands both the loudest >>>>> forms of moral outrage .?'?¯)and a collective resistance aimed at >>>>> eliminating the narratives, power .?'?¯)relations, and values that >>>>> support it. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone who uses children as human shields or a free pass to >>>>> citizenship in this sovereign nation >>>> >>>> Who is doing so? I just see refugees fleeing violence in Central >>>> America. But then, I'm not watching Fox News and Project >>>> Veritas(<snicker>)'s faked videos of Planned Parenthood baby parts and >>>> other miscellaneous propaganda. >>> >>> Fox hired a bunch of actors and staged the whole thing? >> >> Nothing you see on Fox can be trusted. > > You didn't answer the question. Yet another "you can't trust Fox because Michael Moore says that it's bad" moron. The fact that these people were smart enough to figure out how to breathe and blink shocks me. -- SilverSlimer Minds: @silverslimer
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 12:17 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <j6b00etkraoi7lplbjbq0f06cvgsk74ten@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #715420 |
SilverSlimer wrote: >>> Nothing you see on Fox can be trusted. >> >> You didn't answer the question. > >Yet another "you can't trust Fox because Michael Moore says that it's >bad" moron. Yet another completely made-up charge from the right-wing propagandist. >The fact that these people were smart enough to figure out >how to breathe and blink shocks me. If they were as stupid as you claim, they would be right-wingers. -- '(Linux is) designed for a "community"????????????????????? Hahahahha. Whats that? A group of people who dont want to buy anything????' - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 11:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <bpm053.acu.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #715423 |
On 2018-11-29 11:17 a.m., chrisv wrote: > SilverSlimer wrote: > >>>> Nothing you see on Fox can be trusted. >>> >>> You didn't answer the question. >> >> Yet another "you can't trust Fox because Michael Moore says that it's >> bad" moron. > > Yet another completely made-up charge from the right-wing > propagandist. > >> The fact that these people were smart enough to figure out >> how to breathe and blink shocks me. > > If they were as stupid as you claim, they would be right-wingers. > is a guy allowed to have two left wings
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366a474f3aa67a59229@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #715424 |
In article <bpm053.acu.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > >On 2018-11-29 11:17 a.m., chrisv wrote: >> SilverSlimer wrote: >> >>>>> Nothing you see on Fox can be trusted. >>>> >>>> You didn't answer the question. >>> >>> Yet another "you can't trust Fox because Michael Moore says that it's >>> bad" moron. >> >> Yet another completely made-up charge from the right-wing >> propagandist. >> >>> The fact that these people were smart enough to figure out >>> how to breathe and blink shocks me. >> >> If they were as stupid as you claim, they would be right-wingers. >> >is a guy allowed to have two left wings But then they would just fly in circles....oh wait
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 35 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 33 34 [35] 36 37 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web