Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #715326 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-29 05:33 -0500 |
| Last post | 2018-12-03 17:38 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 54 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:33 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:13 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 13:00 -0600
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:01 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 07:43 +0000
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:26 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:13 +0000
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:56 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:26 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:53 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:22 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 11:40 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:41 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 14:46 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:53 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 14:58 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:01 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:09 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 17:50 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:54 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 20:41 -0800
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:01 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 16:45 -0800
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:41 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:04 +0000
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:40 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:42 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:12 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 11:40 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 10:14 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 15:37 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 21:53 +0000
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:44 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:57 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:07 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:06 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:59 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 11:30 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 11:33 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-03 23:46 +0000
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-12-03 08:03 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 23:55 -0600
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 20:23 -0800
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:32 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Gronk <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-08 23:50 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 07:14 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-09 11:59 -0500
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-09 10:07 -0700
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 11:23 -0800
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 13:31 -0600
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-11-29 14:40 -0800
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-12-03 16:20 -0800
Re: These deep-sea microbes eat greenhouse gases "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-12-03 17:38 -0800
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 20:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ptvnpr$vf9$3@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #716044 |
x-no-archive: yes On 12/1/2018 2:54 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-12-01 3:50 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 15:09:34 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >> >>> I don't know about you but I don't use my mouth to type. >> >> That's right. You and kensi are mouth-breathers >> who drag your knuckles across the keyboard. >> >> Smackdown! >> > > do people really still say smack down that is so fk'in old Smackdown! oh wait...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 13:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bprequ.e8t.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #715986 |
On 2018-12-01 12:53 p.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <d4p50ehvtq0g6cad7rch2ejs3g63335emn@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 12:41:48 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> In article <f8e50e5a1kcdnq5m1a5uvh3s3ojeb95j7k@4ax.com>, >>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>> >>>> On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 11:22:15 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On 12/1/2018 10:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <pttulk$fkc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 8:56 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <pts95i$v5e$47@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:26:29 -0500, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 2:43 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> MID, kooky? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As usual nutjob Nads says nothing. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As usual kooky rightard can't back up what he's bleating. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He had to take a number, I'm still waiting for you to back up a few >>>>>>>> things. Starting with your fat ass. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *You* are the *last* one here who should be saying *anything* about >>>>>>> anyone else failing to back up their claims, k0Okt4rd. >>>>>> >>>>>> Says the monkey who has yet to back up things it said about me. >>>>> >>>>> You first, k00k. Back up *everything* you've said. About me, about >>>>> Christine Blasey-Ford, about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, about the >>>>> caravan's people, about fricking Sandra Fluke way the hell back in the >>>>> "good old days" when the worst the Rethugs were doing was dismantling >>>>> the social safety net when they weren't being the laughingstocks of >>>>> Congress with ludicrous bullshit like "legitimate rape". And then we'll >>>>> talk. Maybe. >>>> >>>> You two need to stop talking and GET A ROOM. >>>> Talking doesn't seem to be enough for you two >>>> to get enough of each other. So, go fuck your >>>> collective brains out somewhere - anywhere. >>> >>> Says the frogger demanding attention. >> >> Demanding attention is a far different thing than >> wishing for a little peace and quiet from a couple >> of chronic post-humping addicts, dude. > > You do have an off button don't you? > < snickerage >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 16:45 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366ccb1484fe9594995983@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #715946 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <f8e50e5a1kcdnq5m1a5uvh3s3ojeb95j7k@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... @fart@ @fart@On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 11:22:15 -0500, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: @fart@>On 12/1/2018 10:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: @fart@>> In article <pttulk$fkc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... @fart@>>> On 11/30/2018 8:56 PM, Skeeter wrote: @fart@>>>> In article <pts95i$v5e$47@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid @fart@>>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:26:29 -0500, benj wrote: @fart@>>>>>> On 11/30/2018 2:43 AM, Nadegda wrote: @fart@>>>>>>> MID, kooky? @fart@>>>>>> @fart@>>>>>> As usual nutjob Nads says nothing. @fart@>>>>> @fart@>>>>> As usual kooky rightard can't back up what he's bleating. @fart@>>>> @fart@>>>> He had to take a number, I'm still waiting for you to back up a few @fart@>>>> things. Starting with your fat ass. @fart@>>> @fart@>>> *You* are the *last* one here who should be saying *anything* about @fart@>>> anyone else failing to back up their claims, k0Okt4rd. @fart@>> @fart@>> Says the monkey who has yet to back up things it said about me. @fart@> @fart@>You first, k00k. Back up *everything* you've said. About me, about @fart@>Christine Blasey-Ford, about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, about the @fart@>caravan's people, about fricking Sandra Fluke way the hell back in the @fart@>"good old days" when the worst the Rethugs were doing was dismantling @fart@>the social safety net when they weren't being the laughingstocks of @fart@>Congress with ludicrous bullshit like "legitimate rape". And then we'll @fart@>talk. Maybe. @fart@ @fart@You two need to stop talking and GET A ROOM. @fart@Talking doesn't seem to be enough for you two @fart@to get enough of each other. So, go fuck your @fart@collective brains out somewhere - anywhere. They already have a room... in your head. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 12:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366c91c5651be9d429c@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #715932 |
In article <ptucfn$16ub$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/1/2018 10:53 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pttulk$fkc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> >>> On 11/30/2018 8:56 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <pts95i$v5e$47@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 12:26:29 -0500, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 11/30/2018 2:43 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> MID, kooky? >>>>>> >>>>>> As usual nutjob Nads says nothing. >>>>> >>>>> As usual kooky rightard can't back up what he's bleating. >>>> >>>> He had to take a number, I'm still waiting for you to back up a few >>>> things. Starting with your fat ass. >>> >>> *You* are the *last* one here who should be saying *anything* about >>> anyone else failing to back up their claims, k0Okt4rd. >> >> Says the monkey who has yet to back up things it said about me. > >You first, k00k. Back up *everything* you've said. About me, about >Christine Blasey-Ford, about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, about the >caravan's people, about fricking Sandra Fluke way the hell back in the >"good old days" when the worst the Rethugs were doing was dismantling >the social safety net when they weren't being the laughingstocks of >Congress with ludicrous bullshit like "legitimate rape". And then we'll >talk. Maybe. It appears I didn't have to do that to get you to foam out. Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to slink away from that one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 02:04 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #715978 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <ptucfn$16ub$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> [snip] > Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to slink > away from that one. Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the link to the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the proof every single time I post anything at all. And STILL you are foaming about how I allegedly haven't posted the proof! -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 19:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366cf3f65e793d072bc@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716094 |
In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <ptucfn$16ub$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> [snip] >> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to slink >> away from that one. > >Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the link to >the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the proof every single >time I post anything at all. And STILL you are foaming about how I >allegedly haven't posted the proof! Nope, just your babble, no proof.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 08:42 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716104 |
On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to slink >>> away from that one. >> >> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the link to >> the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the proof every single >> time I post anything at all. And STILL you are foaming about how I >> allegedly haven't posted the proof! > > Nope, just your babble The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 08:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366da43de2aa2d422c5@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716166 |
In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to slink >>>> away from that one. >>> >>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the link to >>> the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the proof every single >>> time I post anything at all. And STILL you are foaming about how I >>> allegedly haven't posted the proof! >> >> Nope, just your babble >The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. That link proves nothing. Another lie told by your sock.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 11:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pu11tr$1d4k$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716193 |
On 12/2/2018 10:12 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to slink >>>>> away from that one. >>>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the link to >>>> the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the proof every single >>>> time I post anything at all. And STILL you are foaming about how I >>>> allegedly haven't posted the proof! >>> Nope, just your babble >> The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >> that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. > > That link proves nothing. Well, at least you've conceded that it was *your* babble. But why won't you concede the plain and obvious meaning of the words you babbled, Ko0ky McMoocher? *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 10:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366dc0c62a854b752cd@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716217 |
In article <pu11tr$1d4k$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/2/2018 10:12 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to slink >>>>>> away from that one. >>>>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>>>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the link to >>>>> the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the proof every single >>>>> time I post anything at all. And STILL you are foaming about how I >>>>> allegedly haven't posted the proof! >>>> Nope, just your babble >>> The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >>> that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. >> >> That link proves nothing. > >Well, at least you've conceded that it was *your* babble. But why won't >you concede the plain and obvious meaning of the words you babbled, >Ko0ky McMoocher? > >*snicker* I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, it's easier to remember.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 15:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bjg80ehcrio8a2n0g7qek9t7eb3f8c51j1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #716229 |
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote: <...> >I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >it's easier to remember. That would explain Hillary's memory problems. LOL! -- Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall Message-ID: <MPG.365d48f8837fd68d99575a@news.altopia.com> "My time is correct. Maybe you forget to change your time to match mine the last time you forged me, punk." --Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 21:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #716229 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: > In article <pu11tr$1d4k$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> >>On 12/2/2018 10:12 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>> On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to >>>>>>> slink away from that one. >>>>>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>>>>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the >>>>>> link to the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the >>>>>> proof every single time I post anything at all. And STILL you are >>>>>> foaming about how I allegedly haven't posted the proof! >>>>> Nope, just your babble >>>> The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >>>> that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. >>> >>> That link proves nothing. >> >>Well, at least you've conceded that it was *your* babble. But why won't >>you concede the plain and obvious meaning of the words you babbled, >>Ko0ky McMoocher? >> >>*snicker* > > I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, > it's easier to remember. It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 15:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366e0e245b34e3522e0@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716273 |
In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: > >> In article <pu11tr$1d4k$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> >>>On 12/2/2018 10:12 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>>> On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to >>>>>>>> slink away from that one. >>>>>>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>>>>>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the >>>>>>> link to the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the >>>>>>> proof every single time I post anything at all. And STILL you are >>>>>>> foaming about how I allegedly haven't posted the proof! >>>>>> Nope, just your babble >>>>> The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >>>>> that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. >>>> >>>> That link proves nothing. >>> >>>Well, at least you've conceded that it was *your* babble. But why won't >>>you concede the plain and obvious meaning of the words you babbled, >>>Ko0ky McMoocher? >>> >>>*snicker* >> >> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >> it's easier to remember. > >It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. Yes it was and you got proven a liar. Go watch more CNN so they can tell you what to say next.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 15:55 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpudec.jc3.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716283 |
On 2018-12-02 3:44 p.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: >> >>> In article <pu11tr$1d4k$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> >>>> On 12/2/2018 10:12 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>>>> On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to >>>>>>>>> slink away from that one. >>>>>>>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>>>>>>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the >>>>>>>> link to the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the >>>>>>>> proof every single time I post anything at all. And STILL you are >>>>>>>> foaming about how I allegedly haven't posted the proof! >>>>>>> Nope, just your babble >>>>>> The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >>>>>> that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. >>>>> >>>>> That link proves nothing. >>>> >>>> Well, at least you've conceded that it was *your* babble. But why won't >>>> you concede the plain and obvious meaning of the words you babbled, >>>> Ko0ky McMoocher? >>>> >>>> *snicker* >>> >>> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >>> it's easier to remember. >> >> It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >> furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. > > Yes it was and you got proven a liar. Go watch more CNN so they can tell > you what to say next. > i'm learning all about US politics now that i get fox news
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 15:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366e113be183ea732eb@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716287 |
In article <bpudec.jc3.17.2@news.alt.net>, %@% says... > >On 2018-12-02 3:44 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: >>> >>>> In article <pu11tr$1d4k$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> On 12/2/2018 10:12 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>>>>> On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to >>>>>>>>>> slink away from that one. >>>>>>>>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>>>>>>>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the >>>>>>>>> link to the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the >>>>>>>>> proof every single time I post anything at all. And STILL you are >>>>>>>>> foaming about how I allegedly haven't posted the proof! >>>>>>>> Nope, just your babble >>>>>>> The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >>>>>>> that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. >>>>>> >>>>>> That link proves nothing. >>>>> >>>>> Well, at least you've conceded that it was *your* babble. But why won't >>>>> you concede the plain and obvious meaning of the words you babbled, >>>>> Ko0ky McMoocher? >>>>> >>>>> *snicker* >>>> >>>> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >>>> it's easier to remember. >>> >>> It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >>> furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. >> >> Yes it was and you got proven a liar. Go watch more CNN so they can tell >> you what to say next. >> >i'm learning all about US politics now that i get fox news We planning on dumping cable this week.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <%@%> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-02 16:07 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bpue3p.pka.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #716290 |
On 2018-12-02 3:57 p.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <bpudec.jc3.17.2@news.alt.net>, %@% says... >> >> On 2018-12-02 3:44 p.m., Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <pu11tr$1d4k$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/2/2018 10:12 AM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> In article <pu0ngd$r76$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>>>>>>> On 12/1/2018 9:40 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <ptvek8$cvr$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2018 12:41:14 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Now I'm still waiting on that laptop proof, oh yea, you tried to >>>>>>>>>>> slink away from that one. >>>>>>>>>> Except that was me, not kensi, and I didn't slink anywhere. In fact >>>>>>>>>> because you kept falsely claiming I never posted proof I put the >>>>>>>>>> link to the proof into my fucking .sig. Which means I post the >>>>>>>>>> proof every single time I post anything at all. And STILL you are >>>>>>>>>> foaming about how I allegedly haven't posted the proof! >>>>>>>>> Nope, just your babble >>>>>>>> The link in Nadegda's sig is to an archive of one of *your* posts, so >>>>>>>> that would be *your* babble, k0okt4rd. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That link proves nothing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, at least you've conceded that it was *your* babble. But why won't >>>>>> you concede the plain and obvious meaning of the words you babbled, >>>>>> Ko0ky McMoocher? >>>>>> >>>>>> *snicker* >>>>> >>>>> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >>>>> it's easier to remember. >>>> >>>> It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >>>> furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. >>> >>> Yes it was and you got proven a liar. Go watch more CNN so they can tell >>> you what to say next. >>> >> i'm learning all about US politics now that i get fox news > > We planning on dumping cable this week. > who needs it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 08:06 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pu39o2$1217$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716283 |
On 12/2/2018 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: >>> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >>> it's easier to remember. >> >> It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >> furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. > > Yes it was Was not! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 07:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366ef29f46dedc772f1@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716355 |
In article <pu39o2$1217$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/2/2018 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: >>>> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >>>> it's easier to remember. >>> >>> It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >>> furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. >> >> Yes it was > >Was not! Was and you are still are liar, now run along and watch CNN so you have something to say.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 11:30 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pu3lnn$1qbf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #716379 |
On 12/3/2018 9:59 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <pu39o2$1217$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >> On 12/2/2018 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: >>>>> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >>>>> it's easier to remember. >>>> It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >>>> furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. >>> Yes it was >> Was not! > Was Was not! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-03 11:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.366f24e7679f261830b@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #716398 |
In article <pu3lnn$1qbf$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > >On 12/3/2018 9:59 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <pu39o2$1217$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 >>> On 12/2/2018 5:44 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> In article <pu1k8v$pt3$3@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> On Sun, 02 Dec 2018 10:14:03 -0700, Skeetard wrote: >>>>>> I admitted nothing, your link proves nothing. Try the truth sometime, >>>>>> it's easier to remember. >>>>> It wasn't her link, kooktard, and it proves everything you've been >>>>> furiously foamily denying for weeks, Melty McStupidFace. >>>> Yes it was >>> Was not! >> Was > >Was not! Self Spank noted and laughed at.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web