Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #712106 > unrolled thread

Radiation alert!

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-11-08 05:04 -0500
Last post2018-11-09 08:46 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 189 — 21 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Radiation alert! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-08 05:04 -0500
    Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-08 09:05 -0700
      Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-08 23:27 -0800
        Re: Radiation alert! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-11 15:34 -0600
    Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-08 11:57 -0800
      Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-09 06:51 +0000
        Re: Radiation alert! Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-09 00:56 -0600
        Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-08 23:39 -0800
          Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-09 07:56 +0000
            Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-09 03:03 -0800
              Re: Radiation alert! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-09 07:53 -0500
                Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-09 08:45 -0700
                  Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-09 08:50 -0800
                  Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-10 06:10 +0000
                    Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-09 23:22 -0700
                    Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-09 22:47 -0800
                      Re: Radiation alert! Tin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-09 23:52 -0700
                    Re: Radiation alert! Tin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-09 23:52 -0700
                      Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-10 06:55 +0000
                        Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-10 01:48 -0800
                          Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 12:37 -0700
                            Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 14:49 -0500
                              Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-10 20:12 +0000
                            Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-10 12:36 -0800
                              Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 13:45 -0700
                                Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-11 04:32 +0000
                                  Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 22:20 -0800
                                  Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 09:11 -0700
                                  Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 16:17 -0800
                          Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-11 04:30 +0000
                            Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 22:16 -0800
                              Re: Radiation alert! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-11 06:46 -0500
                                Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-11 09:34 -0500
                                  Re: Radiation alert! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-11 09:40 -0500
                                    Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-11 09:51 -0500
                                      Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-12 06:49 +0000
                                        Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-12 10:50 -0500
                                          Re: Radiation alert! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-12 12:08 -0500
                                            Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-12 12:20 -0500
                                              Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-12 17:30 +0000
                                              Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-13 04:58 +0000
                                                Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 22:08 -0700
                                                  Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-13 00:20 -0500
                                                    Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-13 08:22 -0700
                                                  Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-13 12:40 -0800
                                                Re: Radiation alert! Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-13 12:47 -0800
                                                Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-13 12:28 -0800
                                            Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 12:48 -0800
                                            Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-12 12:54 -0500
                                            Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 17:02 -0700
                                    Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 09:13 -0700
                                      Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 11:49 -0700
                                        Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-11 13:57 -0500
                                Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 07:37 -0800
                                  Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-11 15:40 +0000
                                    Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-11 10:55 -0500
                                Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 09:12 -0700
                                  Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 20:28 -0800
                              Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-11 08:35 -0500
                                Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 09:14 -0700
                                Re: Radiation alert! "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-11 10:37 -0600
                                  Re: Radiation alert! Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-11 11:54 -0500
                                  Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-11 12:21 -0500
                                    Re: Radiation alert! Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-11 10:48 -0800
                                    Re: Radiation alert! "Capt. Neal®" <Capt.Neal@Saluda.NC> - 2018-11-11 12:54 -0600
                                      Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-11 14:01 -0500
                            Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 09:10 -0700
                              Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 20:27 -0800
                                Re: Radiation alert! "Capt. Neal®" <Capt.Neal@Saluda.NC> - 2018-11-11 23:19 -0600
                        Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 08:26 -0500
                          Re: Radiation alert! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-10 08:29 -0500
                          Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-10 13:41 +0000
                            Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 08:59 -0500
                              Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-10 14:45 +0000
                                Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 13:38 -0500
                                  Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-10 19:13 +0000
                          Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 12:37 -0700
          Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-09 07:45 -0500
        Re: Radiation alert! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 11:53 -0500
          Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-10 06:11 +0000
            Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 12:38 -0700
          Re: Radiation alert! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-11 14:45 -0600
            Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-11 15:53 -0500
              Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 13:57 -0700
                Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 20:33 -0800
              Re: Radiation alert! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-11 15:01 -0600
                Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-11 16:08 -0500
                  Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 14:10 -0700
                    Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 16:28 -0800
                      Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 17:37 -0700
            Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 16:22 -0800
              Re: Radiation alert! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-11 19:06 -0600
                Re: Radiation alert! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 11:39 -0500
                  Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 14:11 -0800
    Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-09 06:56 +0000
      Re: Radiation alert! Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-09 01:00 -0600
        Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-09 07:04 +0000
          Re: Radiation alert! Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-09 01:28 -0600
            Re: Radiation alert! Tin-Tin -rABIES- mANDRAKE <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-10 03:49 -0700
      Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-08 23:40 -0800
        Re: Radiation alert! Tin-Tin -rABIES- mANDRAKE <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-10 03:47 -0700
      Re: Radiation alert! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 11:57 -0500
        Re: Radiation alert! Tin-Tin <kremvax2004@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-09 16:45 -0700
          Re: Radiation alert! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-09 19:59 -0500
            Re: Radiation alert! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-10 23:24 -0600
        Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-10 06:12 +0000
          Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 12:39 -0700
    Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-08 23:28 -0800
      Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-08 23:32 -0800
        Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-09 07:58 +0000
          Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-09 00:44 -0800
            Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-09 00:44 -0800
            Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 15:52 -0800
          Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-09 03:04 -0800
            Re: Radiation alert! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-09 07:54 -0500
              Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-09 08:46 -0700
                Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-09 08:51 -0800
              Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-09 08:46 -0800
                Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-10 06:15 +0000
                  Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-09 22:45 -0800
                    Re: Radiation alert! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-10 06:54 +0000
                      Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-10 01:46 -0800
                      Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 12:41 -0700
                        Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-10 12:38 -0800
                          Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 13:44 -0700
                      Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-10 16:04 -0800
                        Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 19:08 -0500
                          Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 17:28 -0700
                            Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 19:40 -0500
                              Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 17:42 -0700
                                Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 15:33 -0800
                                  Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 16:43 -0700
                                    Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 16:47 -0700
                                      Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 17:03 -0700
                                        Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 17:06 -0700
                                    Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-11 16:11 -0800
                                      Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 17:15 -0700
                                      Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 08:42 -0700
                                        Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 14:12 -0800
                                          Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-12 17:25 -0500
                                            Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 17:07 -0700
                                              Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 16:24 -0800
                                            Re: Radiation alert! Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-12 21:34 -0800
                                              Re: Radiation alert! Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-12 19:41 -0800
                                          Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 16:02 -0700
                                            Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 15:24 -0800
                                              Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 16:27 -0700
                                          Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 17:03 -0700
                                            Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 16:22 -0800
                                              Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 17:39 -0700
                                                Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 17:43 -0700
                                                  Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 17:47 -0700
                                                    Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 17:48 -0700
                                                      Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 17:51 -0700
                                                        Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-12 17:55 -0700
                                                          Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-12 19:05 -0800
                          Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-10 21:59 -0500
                            Re: Radiation alert! Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-10 19:07 -0800
                        Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-13 12:46 -0800
                    Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 12:40 -0700
                      Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-10 12:40 -0800
                        Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 13:56 -0700
                          Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.corn> - 2018-11-10 13:25 -0800
                            Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 14:30 -0700
                              Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 13:39 -0800
                                Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 14:47 -0700
                                  Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 14:49 -0800
                                    Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 15:59 -0700
                                      Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 15:07 -0800
                                        Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 16:12 -0700
                                          Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 15:18 -0800
                                            Re: Radiation alert! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 16:21 -0700
                                          Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-10 16:21 -0800
                    Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-10 18:21 -0500
                    Re: Radiation alert! "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-10 16:03 -0800
                      Re: Radiation alert! Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-10 17:25 -0800
                        Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-10 21:17 -0500
                          Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-10 19:28 -0700
                            Re: Radiation alert! mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-10 21:55 -0500
                              Re: Radiation alert! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-10 23:21 -0600
                                Re: Radiation alert! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-11 12:12 -0500
                  Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 08:30 -0500
                    Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-10 13:41 +0000
                      Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 09:00 -0500
                        Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-10 14:47 +0000
                          Re: Radiation alert! "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-10 13:38 -0500
                            Re: Radiation alert! snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-11-10 19:13 +0000
                              Re: Radiation alert! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-10 23:22 -0600
            Re: Radiation alert! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-09 08:46 -0700

Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10  Next page →


#712587

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 17:07 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3653c3c7ad7c6403989edc@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#712575
In article <54vjud9imjvmf8icq1al9n9v8dg7qq847m@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>
>On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:12:44 -0800, "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>
>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>> perhaps?
>>> 
>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>
>Oh yeah!  Read this:  https://familycouncil.org/?p=11795 
>Many deaths attributed to marijuana.

That's like saying a drunk person goes for a drive and kills someone, 
that it's the alcohols fault?

No one has died from direct use of THC.
>
>>I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart 
>>condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>
>It would make me happy if all the dopers died of heart attacks. Rid
>the world of their stench and waste of space.


>
>Dopers are an affront to God who says one's body is a temple
>and shouldn't be defiled with addictive substances.

But weed isn't addictive.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712590

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 16:24 -0800
Message-ID<psd5ja$om9$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#712587
On 11/12/2018 4:07 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <54vjud9imjvmf8icq1al9n9v8dg7qq847m@4ax.com>,
> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:12:44 -0800, "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>
>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>
>> Oh yeah!  Read this:  https://familycouncil.org/?p=11795
>> Many deaths attributed to marijuana.
> 
> That's like saying a drunk person goes for a drive and kills someone,
> that it's the alcohols fault?
> 
> No one has died from direct use of THC.

I was just worried about indirectly wrt a cardiovascular condition.


>>
>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>>
>> It would make me happy if all the dopers died of heart attacks. Rid
>> the world of their stench and waste of space.
> 
> 
>>
>> Dopers are an affront to God who says one's body is a temple
>> and shouldn't be defiled with addictive substances.
> 
> But weed isn't addictive.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712605

FromSir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn>
Date2018-11-12 21:34 -0800
Message-ID<MPG.365402255c5e1e499955e5@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#712575
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <54vjud9imjvmf8icq1al9n9v8dg7qq847m@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


<)--->Dopers are an affront to God
<)--->

No, you're thinking of faggots and trannies.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712608

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-11-12 19:41 -0800
Message-ID<psdh5m$dd9$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#712605
x-no-archive: yes

On 11/12/2018 9:34 PM, Sir Gaygory's Owner wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <54vjud9imjvmf8icq1al9n9v8dg7qq847m@4ax.com>,
> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> 
> <)--->Dopers are an affront to God
> <)--->
> 
> No, you're thinking of faggots and trannies.

Remember, it's not gay if you're taking it in the ass, only if you're 
giving it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712579

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-12 16:02 -0700
Message-ID<bo9mak.ep3.19.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to#712572
On 2018-11-12 3:12 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke 
>>>>> combo.
>>>>
>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>> perhaps?
>>
>>      dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>
> 
> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart 
> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.


it only does that for a few minutes

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712580

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 15:24 -0800
Message-ID<psd24b$4ue$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#712579
On 11/12/2018 3:02 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-11-12 3:12 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke 
>>>>>> combo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can 
>>>> raise
>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>> perhaps?
>>>
>>>      dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>
>>
>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart 
>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
> 
> 
> it only does that for a few minutes

5-16ish minutes, depending on strain?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712581

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-12 16:27 -0700
Message-ID<bo9npq.6d6.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#712580
On 2018-11-12 4:24 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 11/12/2018 3:02 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-11-12 3:12 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much 
>>>>>>> THC,
>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke 
>>>>>>> combo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can 
>>>>> raise
>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>
>>>>      dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart 
>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>>
>>
>> it only does that for a few minutes
> 
> 5-16ish minutes, depending on strain?

and the condition of the smoker and what they ate before using and and and

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712586

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 17:03 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3653c2d422e528bd989eda@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#712572
In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>, 
invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>
>On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>
>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>> perhaps?
>> 
>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>> 
>
>I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart 
>condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.

Not in my experience.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712589

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 16:22 -0800
Message-ID<psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#712586
On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>
>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>> perhaps?
>>>
>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>
>>
>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
> 
> Not in my experience.
> 

That is good to hear.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712592

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 17:39 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3653cb298b581428989ee2@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#712589
In article <psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>, 
invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>
>On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>> 
>> Not in my experience.
>> 
>
>That is good to hear.

Wait, my chest feels funny.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712594

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-12 17:43 -0700
Message-ID<bo9s80.r90.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#712592
On 2018-11-12 5:39 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>,
> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>
>> On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>>>
>>> Not in my experience.
>>>
>>
>> That is good to hear.
> 
> Wait, my chest feels funny.
> 
mine shoots up for about 5 minutes ,
i just thought it was the rush i pay for

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712595

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 17:47 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3653cd121618f7f1989eea@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#712594
In article <bo9s80.r90.19.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>
>On 2018-11-12 5:39 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>,
>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>>>>
>>>> Not in my experience.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is good to hear.
>> 
>> Wait, my chest feels funny.
>> 
>mine shoots up for about 5 minutes ,
>i just thought it was the rush i pay for

I like the good sativa that goes straight to your head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712596

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-12 17:48 -0700
Message-ID<bo9sil.r90.19.7@news.alt.net>
In reply to#712595
On 2018-11-12 5:47 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <bo9s80.r90.19.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 2018-11-12 5:39 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>>>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not in my experience.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is good to hear.
>>>
>>> Wait, my chest feels funny.
>>>
>> mine shoots up for about 5 minutes ,
>> i just thought it was the rush i pay for
> 
> I like the good sativa that goes straight to your head.
> 
i think that's what i just bought a half once of

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712597

FromSkeeter <chico@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 17:51 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3653ce14ceb1472989eef@news.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#712596
In article <bo9sil.r90.19.7@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>
>On 2018-11-12 5:47 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <bo9s80.r90.19.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 2018-11-12 5:39 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>>>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>>>>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not in my experience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That is good to hear.
>>>>
>>>> Wait, my chest feels funny.
>>>>
>>> mine shoots up for about 5 minutes ,
>>> i just thought it was the rush i pay for
>> 
>> I like the good sativa that goes straight to your head.
>> 
>i think that's what i just bought a half once of

Yay...I ate some medicated chocolate cake tonight, give me about an hour 
and I'll give a quality control report.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712599

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-12 17:55 -0700
Message-ID<bo9sub.eme.17.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#712597
On 2018-11-12 5:51 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <bo9sil.r90.19.7@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On 2018-11-12 5:47 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <bo9s80.r90.19.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2018-11-12 5:39 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too much THC,
>>>>>>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or stroke combo.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance that can raise
>>>>>>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing with fire,
>>>>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 	 dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>>>>>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart rate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not in my experience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is good to hear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wait, my chest feels funny.
>>>>>
>>>> mine shoots up for about 5 minutes ,
>>>> i just thought it was the rush i pay for
>>>
>>> I like the good sativa that goes straight to your head.
>>>
>> i think that's what i just bought a half once of
> 
> Yay...I ate some medicated chocolate cake tonight, give me about an hour
> and I'll give a quality control report.
> 
i have to wait about 10 days ,
but i have my stash from my local go to guy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712606

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-12 19:05 -0800
Message-ID<psdf23$3l3$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#712599
On 11/12/2018 4:55 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-11-12 5:51 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <bo9sil.r90.19.7@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On 2018-11-12 5:47 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <bo9s80.r90.19.2@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2018-11-12 5:39 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <psd5fk$om9$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/12/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <psctsu$cdm$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/12/2018 7:42 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <psagf8$5sc$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/11/2018 3:43 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <psae95$olu$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2018 4:42 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-11-10 5:40 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:28:50 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <...>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it only took me half of one post but i'm a high achiever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then perhaps you shouldn't smoke so much pot.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's no such thing as so much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actually, if one has a bad heart condition, and ingests too 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> much THC,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they should be at a "higher" risk for heart attack and/or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> stroke combo.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Should be and facts are 2 different things.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you have a bad heart condition, and ingest a substance 
>>>>>>>>>>> that can raise
>>>>>>>>>>> your heart rate and blood pressure... Well, you are playing 
>>>>>>>>>>> with fire,
>>>>>>>>>>> perhaps?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>      dunno, no one has died from weed yet.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am wondering if it can possibly be bad for a person with a heart
>>>>>>>>> condition to consume. The weed can really increase ones heart 
>>>>>>>>> rate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not in my experience.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is good to hear.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wait, my chest feels funny.
>>>>>>
>>>>> mine shoots up for about 5 minutes ,
>>>>> i just thought it was the rush i pay for
>>>>
>>>> I like the good sativa that goes straight to your head.
>>>>
>>> i think that's what i just bought a half once of
>>
>> Yay...I ate some medicated chocolate cake tonight, give me about an hour
>> and I'll give a quality control report.
>>
> i have to wait about 10 days ,
> but i have my stash from my local go to guy

One can always try to put a drug dealer out of business by growing the 
shi%, and not selling anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712373

Frommixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date2018-11-10 21:59 -0500
Message-ID<ps85v9$hpu$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#712352
On 11/10/2018 7:08 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:04:26 -0800, "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 11/9/2018 10:54 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2018 22:45:44 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>> In article <ps5t1j$m5o$23@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says...
>> [...]
>>>> So you never heard anything about a bunch of antifa assholes surrounding
>>>> Tucker Carlson's house, threatening his wife who was alone inside, and
>>>> even cracking his oak door with repeated body slams, spray painting his
>>>> car and driveway, and mentioning pipe bombs?
>>>
>>> Nope, and I won't believe that happened until and unless it shows up on
>>> *reputable* news stations.
>> 
>> Wow.
> 
> Yah, you don't really know the meaning of ignorance and
> closed-mindedness unless you've read a few dozen Nadegda
> posts.

You forgot to mention "well formatted", "neatly trimmed" and "highly 
informative" posts.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712375

FromJanithor <Janithor@comcast.net>
Date2018-11-10 19:07 -0800
Message-ID<ps86dp$mpu$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#712373
x-no-archive: yes

On 11/10/2018 6:59 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 11/10/2018 7:08 PM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:04:26 -0800, "Chris M. Thomasson" 
>> <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 11/9/2018 10:54 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2018 22:45:44 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> In article <ps5t1j$m5o$23@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid 
>>>>> says...
>>> [...]
>>>>> So you never heard anything about a bunch of antifa assholes 
>>>>> surrounding
>>>>> Tucker Carlson's house, threatening his wife who was alone inside, and
>>>>> even cracking his oak door with repeated body slams, spray painting 
>>>>> his
>>>>> car and driveway, and mentioning pipe bombs?
>>>>
>>>> Nope, and I won't believe that happened until and unless it shows up on
>>>> *reputable* news stations.
>>>
>>> Wow.
>>
>> Yah, you don't really know the meaning of ignorance and
>> closed-mindedness unless you've read a few dozen Nadegda
>> posts.
> 
> You forgot to mention "well formatted", "neatly trimmed" and "highly 
> informative" posts.

I wonder how tall Greg is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712673

From"Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-11-13 12:46 -0800
Message-ID<psfd6f$aob$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#712351
On 11/10/2018 4:04 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 11/9/2018 10:54 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2018 22:45:44 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!  In article <ps5t1j$m5o$23@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
>>> @gmail.invalid says...
> [...]
>>> So you never heard anything about a bunch of antifa assholes surrounding
>>> Tucker Carlson's house, threatening his wife who was alone inside, and
>>> even cracking his oak door with repeated body slams, spray painting his
>>> car and driveway, and mentioning pipe bombs?
>>
>> Nope, and I won't believe that happened until and unless it shows up on
>> *reputable* news stations.

How about something like:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/08/media/tucker-carlson-protestors/index.html

?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#712311

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-11-10 12:40 -0700
Message-ID<bo41o0.63g.17.14@news.alt.net>
In reply to#712261
On 2018-11-09 11:45 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <ps5t1j$m5o$23@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> Mo0OoT
> Mo0OoTTime to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> Mo0OoTOn Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:46:33 -0800, Checkmate wrote:
> Mo0OoT
> Mo0OoT> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Mo0OoT> Checkmate!  In article <ps401s$1snu$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> Mo0OoT> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> Mo0OoT>
> Mo0OoT>
> Mo0OoT> weRRen weRRenOn 11/9/2018 6:04 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Mo0OoT> weRRen> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> Mo0OoT> posts by weRRen> Checkmate!  In article <ps3emr$m5o$17@dont-email.me>,
> Mo0OoT> nad318b404 weRRen> @gmail.invalid says...
> Mo0OoT> weRRen> bo0py!Doesn't matter what he was in the past. He's basically
> Mo0OoT> Hitler with a weRRen> bo0py!combover now, and his followers include an
> Mo0OoT> awful lot of card-carrying weRRen> bo0py!Nazis. That bunch are damned
> Mo0OoT> dangerous.
> Mo0OoT> weRRen>
> Mo0OoT> weRRen> Like the rabid card-carrying antifa nazis who paid Tucker a
> Mo0OoT> visit last weRRen> night?
> Mo0OoT> weRRen weRRenThe fuck are you frothing about *this* time?
> Mo0OoT>
> Mo0OoT> Try reading the news CNN doesn't talk about.
> Mo0OoT
> Mo0OoTYou mean the right-wing propaganda at Fox and Infowars that is, in large
> Mo0OoTpart, made up out of whole cloth?
> Mo0OoT
> Mo0OoTWhy would kensi want to read that? There are far more entertaining, better-
> Mo0OoTplotted works of fiction with better characterization and even sensible
> Mo0OoTvillain motives airing 24/7 on the superchannel that she could watch
> Mo0OoTinstead.
> 
> So you never heard anything about a bunch of antifa assholes surrounding
> Tucker Carlson's house, threatening his wife who was alone inside, and
> even cracking his oak door with repeated body slams, spray painting his
> car and driveway, and mentioning pipe bombs?  Or is it, you'd prefer not
> to discuss that?  If it's the latter, you're a cowardly dirt bag.
> 
just a regular day here

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 8 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web