Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #709876 > unrolled thread

Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-27 10:03 -0400
    Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-27 10:09 -0400
      Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-27 10:52 -0400
        Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-27 10:58 -0400
          Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-27 11:03 -0400
            Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-27 09:06 -0600
              Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-27 11:10 -0400
                Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-27 09:14 -0600
                Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-27 11:17 -0400
                  Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 13:51 -0700
                Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 14:24 -0400
      Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-27 11:00 -0400
      Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-27 14:23 -0400
      Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-30 00:52 -0500
        Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 09:55 -0400
        Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-30 10:26 -0400
          Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-30 10:32 -0400
          Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-30 08:35 -0600
            Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-30 10:21 -0500
            Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-30 10:43 -0500
    Re: Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-27 08:40 -0600

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#709876 — Climate change: Five cheap ways to remove CO2 from the atmosphere

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated 
that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45967215

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#709877

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:03:03 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:

>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated 
>that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:

<snipped leftist propaganda URL>

The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data in order 
to better suit their socialist agenda. Only a fool would believe
anything they say now.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as
   strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear 
   that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. 
   --Theodore Kaczynski, Ph.D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709897

On 10/27/2018 10:09 AM, stinky puddles piddled:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:03:03 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated
>> that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:
>>
>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45967215
> 
> The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
> manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data

Proof, kOok?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709901

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:52:10 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>On 10/27/2018 10:09 AM, stinky puddles piddled:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:03:03 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated
>>> that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:
>>>
>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45967215
>> 
>> The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
>> manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data
>
>Proof, kOok?

https://www.skepticalscience.com/IPCC-Medieval-Warm-Period.htm

"In short, Figure 7.1c from the IPCC FAR was based on Lamb's 
approximation of the central England temperature.  It was intended
only as a schematic diagram, and known not to accurately reflect 
the global average temperature."

Smackdown!

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as
   strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear 
   that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. 
   --Theodore Kaczynski, Ph.D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709906

On 10/27/2018 10:58 AM, stinky puddles piddled:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:52:10 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> On 10/27/2018 10:09 AM, stinky puddles piddled:
>>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:03:03 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated
>>>> that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-45967215
>>>
>>> The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
>>> manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data
>>
>> Proof, kOok?
> 
> https://www.skepticalscience.com/IPCC-Medieval-Warm-Period.htm

Really? You're citing a site that emphatically proves that climate 
change *is* happening as supposed proof that it isn't? You're even more 
stupid than I thought, puddles.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709907

In article <pr1unb$1291$13@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> Really? You're citing a site that emphatically proves that climate 
> change *is* happening as supposed proof that it isn't? You're even more 
> stupid than I thought, puddles.
> 

He learned it from you KKKensi.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709908

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 09:06:16 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote:

>In article <pr1unb$1291$13@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
>@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>> Really? You're citing a site that emphatically proves that climate 
>> change *is* happening as supposed proof that it isn't? You're even more 
>> stupid than I thought, puddles.
>> 
>
>He learned it from you KKKensi.

Did you notice how she snipped the fact that
proved the shameful reality of data manipulation
by the IPCC?

Typical libtard/warmingtard methodology.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as
   strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear 
   that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. 
   --Theodore Kaczynski, Ph.D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709914

In article <nsv8td1igqf4g0g7l37jk11k33s5mk6rrq@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...
> 
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 09:06:16 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >In article <pr1unb$1291$13@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> >@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> >> Really? You're citing a site that emphatically proves that climate 
> >> change *is* happening as supposed proof that it isn't? You're even more 
> >> stupid than I thought, puddles.
> >> 
> >
> >He learned it from you KKKensi.
> 
> Did you notice how she snipped the fact that
> proved the shameful reality of data manipulation
> by the IPCC?
> 
> Typical libtard/warmingtard methodology.

I'm still waiting for her to show where I said I mooched my "mothers" 
computer. The snippage is deep in this one.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709917

On 10/27/2018 11:10 AM, stinky puddles piddled:
> Did you notice how she snipped the fact that
> proved the shameful reality of data manipulation
> by the IPCC?

No data manipulation, no proof, fake news.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709964

On 2018-10-27 8:17 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 10/27/2018 11:10 AM, stinky puddles piddled:
>> Did you notice how she snipped the fact that
>> proved the shameful reality of data manipulation
>> by the IPCC?
> 
> No data manipulation, no proof, fake news.
> 
in 8,000 years the sun will blow up ,
global warming won't matter then

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709949

On 10/27/2018 11:10 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 09:06:16 -0600, Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> In article <pr1unb$1291$13@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>> Really? You're citing a site that emphatically proves that climate
>>> change *is* happening as supposed proof that it isn't? You're even more
>>> stupid than I thought, puddles.
>>>
>>
>> He learned it from you KKKensi.
> 
> Did you notice how she snipped the fact that
> proved the shameful reality of data manipulation
> by the IPCC?
> 
> Typical libtard/warmingtard methodology.
> 
CITE? MIDS? STAND ON YOUR HEAD?

See you got nothing! <snicker>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709904

On 10/27/2018 10:09 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:03:03 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated
>> that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:
> 
> <snipped leftist propaganda URL>
> 
> The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
> manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data in order
> to better suit their socialist agenda. Only a fool would believe
> anything they say now.

They clearly have the inate understanding it takes to be The President 
of America!

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#709948

On 10/27/2018 10:09 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:03:03 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated
>> that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:
> 
> <snipped leftist propaganda URL>
> 
> The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
> manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data in order
> to better suit their socialist agenda. Only a fool would believe
> anything they say now.
> 
They are a political body not a scientific one so it's no wonder they 
are confirmed liars. It's the same proof that "Kensi" is no scientist.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710302

On 10/27/2018 9:09 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:03:03 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated 
>> that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:
> 
> <snipped leftist propaganda URL>
> 
> The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
> manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data in order 
> to better suit their socialist agenda. Only a fool would believe
> anything they say now.
> 

IPCC also says Socialism is the only answer to solve he problem

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710323

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>On 10/27/2018, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>>> The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and others have all stated 
>>> that extracting CO2 from the air will be needed:
>> 
>> <snipped leftist propaganda URL>
>> 
>> The IPCC is a discredited body. They were caught, red-handed,
>> manipulating and changing actual data to fictitious data in order 
>> to better suit their socialist agenda. Only a fool would believe
>> anything they say now.
>
>IPCC also says Socialism is the only answer to solve he problem

Yes, socialists always push socialism as the answer 
to *all* the world's problems.  Socialists will never 
give up no matter how many times their system of 
public slavery fails.  Knuckle-draggers the likes of
kensi and Nadegda just don't understand how they
are useful idiots.  Such as these will be among the
hordes to be ethnically cleansed in a socialist jihad.

That such as these work so diligently towards their
own demise perhaps is a case of Darwinism at work.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as
   strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear 
   that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. 
   --Theodore Kaczynski, Ph.D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710331

On 10/30/2018 1:52 AM, Sergio wrote:
> IPCC also says Socialism is the only answer to solve he problem

IPCC is, as usual, correct.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710333

On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:26:10 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>On 10/30/2018 1:52 AM, Sergio wrote:
>
>> IPCC also says Socialism is the only answer to solve he problem
>
>IPCC is, as usual, corrupt.

Fixed it for you.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as
   strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear 
   that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. 
   --Theodore Kaczynski, Ph.D.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710335

In article <pr9pm5$1hbh$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 10/30/2018 1:52 AM, Sergio wrote:
> > IPCC also says Socialism is the only answer to solve he problem
> 
> IPCC is, as usual, correct.

Proof KoOk?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710359

On 10/30/2018 9:35 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <pr9pm5$1hbh$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>
>> On 10/30/2018 1:52 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> IPCC also says Socialism is the only answer to solve he problem
>>
>> IPCC is, as usual, correct.
> 
> Proof KoOk?
> 



 give kensi pupa a break, 'she' pupa,
very small underdeveloped worm brain,
only holds 3 bits binary now.
and 'she' still stuck on 000, Poor kensi pupate!
nothing up there!



kensi pupa trying to spread glowball worming fear...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZOKbou-kqF8

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#710364

On 10/30/2018 9:35 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <pr9pm5$1hbh$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>
>> On 10/30/2018 1:52 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> IPCC also says Socialism is the only answer to solve he problem
>>
>> IPCC is, as usual, correct.
> 
> Proof KoOk?
> 

kensi pupa, go read the raw measurement data your own self, with your
background you will instantly see their is *no data* for 99.99% of
earths surface before 1986.

kensi pupa, you will also see that the satellite instruments absolute
temperature accuracy is only +- 1 C , uses only 2 bands of IR, and that
clouds and water vapor greatly distort reading.

kensi pupa, since your brain is still so small and developing, I will
send you a brain booster of magnesium hydroxide.  You will get the final
sleep you need.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web