Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #520647 > unrolled thread

Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 06:32 -0500
    Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 08:03 -0500
      Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  ( Kid did just that ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-13 11:45 -0500
        Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills:  Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers  ( Kid did just that ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-13 13:50 -0500
        Re: Rocky's magic science jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-13 19:16 +0000
          Re: Rocky's magic science Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:51 +0200
          Re: Rocky's magic science BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-14 10:02 -0400
            Re: Rocky's magic science gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-14 09:43 -0500
            Re: Rocky's magic science "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-14 10:07 -0700
              Re: Rocky's magic science "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-14 18:38 -0500

#520647 — Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers

Ok Kid, I had to add your name above because neither jimp or FN Nut helped 
you out.

You Kid, claimed they had a story for me on why the debris pile from the 
Twin Towers is consistent with a Nuclear Controlled Demolition but they 
can't repost it for me so that leaves you holding the bat.

***************** OP:

So what is your story about what remained of the Twin Towers and you can't
claim anything went into the basements because nothing did.

And you also have to consider the fact there were about a dozen survivors in
the North Tower and free standing walls of both the Twin Towers.

 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Oh, and isn't it funny how that haze in the above photo comes from where 
three deep underground nukes were detonated?  <G>

Rocky

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#520667

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 06:32:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>Ok Kid, I had to add your name above because neither jimp or FN Nut helped 
>you out.
>

     Who is Kid? And why are you obsessing over this phantom person?
I'm being very serious when I ask.

>You Kid, claimed they had a story for me on why the debris pile from the 

     No one has claimed any story of any sort was for you. Your
delusion that everything is centered around you is not healthy. 

>Twin Towers is consistent with a Nuclear Controlled Demolition but they 
>can't repost it for me so that leaves you holding the bat.
>

     While FNVW's explanation was far more detailed, both have
explained exactly how there was no nuclear explosions on 9/11/01. I
have also provided evidence that no nuclear explosions occurred. Mine
was also less detailed than FNVW.

[snip post from another thread]

     Your attempt to divert attention from the truth is not the
benefit you believe it to be.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520704 — Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Kid did just that )

"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:9vsavappgnd8qb1o20479fh3q8f329brsf@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 06:32:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>>Ok Kid, I had to add your name above because neither jimp or FN Nut helped
>>you out.
>>
>
>     Who is Kid? And why are you obsessing over this phantom person?
> I'm being very serious when I ask.

You are Kid because you act like one and if you want me to believe the 'K' 
stands for something besides "Kid" you will have to prove it.  <G>


>>You Kid, claimed they had a story for me on why the debris pile from the
>
>     No one has claimed any story of any sort was for you. Your
> delusion that everything is centered around you is not healthy.

If they have not been able to explain why the following was left standing 
from the Twin Towers and not crushed by the 100 floors above them then why 
the hell can't they?  <G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg


>>Twin Towers is consistent with a Nuclear Controlled Demolition but they
>>can't repost it for me so that leaves you holding the bat.
>>
>
>     While FNVW's explanation was far more detailed, both have
> explained exactly how there was no nuclear explosions on 9/11/01.

Too bad all that can be considered bullshit because nothing else explains 
the following other than a Nuclear Controlled Demoltion:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners 
helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.

Again, there are two sides of the equation and just saying that didn't 
happen does not explain why it did happen.  ROTFLMAO

Once again, the evidence that the official bullshit has never addressed 
proves the Twin Towers did not collapse to the ground because it didn't 
crush the free standing walls or the Survivors or end up in the basement. 
<G>
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

Rocky 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520734 — Re: Ping FFN, jimp and Kid Wills: Tell me some bullshit about what remained of the Twin Towers ( Kid did just that )

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 11:45:29 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>
>"K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:9vsavappgnd8qb1o20479fh3q8f329brsf@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 06:32:44 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Ok Kid, I had to add your name above because neither jimp or FN Nut helped
>>>you out.
>>
>>     Who is Kid? And why are you obsessing over this phantom person?
>> I'm being very serious when I ask.
>
>You are Kid 

     Keep guessing. If you guess every possible first name for me that
starts with K, you'll eventually get it.
     Here's a hint: I was born in Krakow, Poland. This should allow
you to eliminate most Anglican names.

>because you act like one and if you want me to believe the 'K' 
>stands for something besides "Kid" you will have to prove it.  <G>
>

     It's not my burden to disprove my name in real life is Kid. It is
your burden to prove it is.
     Since this is just another example of your mental defect(s),
you'll never prove your claim.

>>>You Kid, claimed they had a story for me on why the debris pile from the
>>
>>     No one has claimed any story of any sort was for you. Your
>> delusion that everything is centered around you is not healthy.
>
>If they have not been able to explain why the following was left standing 
>from the Twin Towers and not crushed by the 100 floors above them then why 
>the hell can't they?  <G>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>

     What does this have to do with your claim above that stories are
for you?

>>>Twin Towers is consistent with a Nuclear Controlled Demolition but they
>>>can't repost it for me so that leaves you holding the bat.
>>
>>     While FNVW's explanation was far more detailed, both have
>> explained exactly how there was no nuclear explosions on 9/11/01.
>
>Too bad all that can be considered bullshit because nothing else explains 
>the following other than a Nuclear Controlled Demoltion:
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

     Too bad that picture proves your claim of nukes wrong. Still.

>
>And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners 
>helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.

     What, in reality, is a themo nuclear bomb?

>
>Again, there are two sides of the equation and just saying that didn't 
>happen does not explain why it did happen.  ROTFLMAO
>

     It is fortunate many have explained why the towers and #7 did
collapse. You'll note none claim a nuke (or 34 as you once claimed)
was involved.

>Once again, the evidence that the official bullshit has never addressed 
>proves the Twin Towers did not collapse to the ground because it didn't 
>crush the free standing walls or the Survivors or end up in the basement. 
><G>
> http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

     Once again your own evidence proves your claims wrong. 
     Now whine in a pathetic attempt to avoid the truth. You'll have
to, unless you try to run away from it.

-- 
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520751 — Re: Rocky's magic science

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
 
> And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners 
> helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.

Rocky's fairy tale physics hits a new low; what an ignorant, delusional
fuckwit.

<snip remaining delusional raving>


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#520947 — Re: Rocky's magic science

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com, in <news:blugcc-p6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> In sci.physics Rocky (aka Roger Wittekind the
> schizophrenic paranoid-delusional woman-stalking
> truck crashing kook) <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

>> And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners 
>> helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.

Bwahahahaaaa! Oh my gawd, you're so fucking retarded, it boggles the
mind, Roger. Really?

Ok, get to explaining *exactly* how "liquid freon in the air
conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic] nuclear bomb",
you halfwit.

Fuck sake but you're about the dumbest bastard I've ever run across...
not even Emmett Gulley would believe something as stupid as that, and
he's fucking retarded, Roger.

You should be ashamed of just how fucking stupid you are.

> Rocky's fairy tale physics hits a new low; what an ignorant, delusional
> fuckwit.

He's the dumbest person on Usenet by a wide margin.

<snicker>

-- 

Roger T.E. Wittekind
PO Box 471
167 40th Avenue
East Moline, IL 61244
309-755-6374
309-755-6394

Roger Wittekind the woman-stalking failed truck driver from East
Moline, IL.

Roger Wittekind (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in
trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain
becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate
(which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes
larger and larger leaps of illogic.

For instance:
=============================
A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video
*you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they
must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you
believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed
over the concrete and walked away for 33 years.

B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the
satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and
the tower shaking being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but
kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried
from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil
composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never
mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today,
let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your
kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at
some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the
nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was
"dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years".

C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic
replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally
radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon,
which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken
brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the
triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to
change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up,
walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped
the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an
entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service
personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back
into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words).

D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your
original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite
uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you
k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an
EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs,
so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in
rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke
detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out
electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no
nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the
vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC.

E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried
deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up
your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but
somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that
the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that
miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding,
in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that
your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of
*solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL

F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your
broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to
underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first
because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but
for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to
your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite
uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time
the building shook, which is pretty much where we started. So I've
proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of
sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL

G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your
broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a
desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility...
saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath
the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode,
where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive
metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the
vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why
did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not
just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the
WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP")
and the shaking of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just
as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL

H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID:
<e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of
widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're
off your meds, Roget Wittekind.

I) To back up yor "nuclear terrorism era" k'lame in H) above, you're
now further k'laming there is such a thing as a magical "detonator"
that causes a nuclear weapon to be a "clean nuke" which expulses no
EMP and leaves no radiological contamination... heaping proof upon
proof that you're off your meds, Roger Wittekind.

J) To explain away the lack of any evidence of your k'lame of a
"nuclear terrorism era", your broken brain has conceived that your
magical nukes are employing "Hushaboom technology" (your words) to
silence them.

K) Your broken brain has now stated (MID:
<YtWdnQvC1PTFNWjInZ2dnUU7-NmdnZ2d@giganews.com>) that "liquid freon in
the air conditioners helped to turn the nuke into a themo [sic]
nuclear bomb" (your words). Complete and utter nonsense from your
thoroughly broken schizophrenic brain, Roger.

IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from
reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And
the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little
tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very
best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot
with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even
worked up a sweat yet.
=============================

Kook. LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521020 — Re: Rocky's magic science

In article <blugcc-p6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
says...
> 
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>  
> > And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners 
> > helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.
> 
> Rocky's fairy tale physics hits a new low; what an ignorant, delusional
> fuckwit.
> 
> <snip remaining delusional raving>

So freon is magic to Rockhead too? If I wasn't sure he's just a troll, I 
might be worried about him.

-- 
BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of 
Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies.
Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former 
Black Helicopter color consultant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521037 — Re: Rocky's magic science

On 9/14/2015 9:02 AM, BDK wrote:
> In article <blugcc-p6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
> says...
>>
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners
>>> helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.
>>
>> Rocky's fairy tale physics hits a new low; what an ignorant, delusional
>> fuckwit.
>>
>> <snip remaining delusional raving>
>
> So freon is magic to Rockhead too? If I wasn't sure he's just a troll, I
> might be worried about him.
>

this free association of thoughts (freon causing mini-nuke) is seen in 
Kuru, Medication issues, alcohol abuse, head injury, alzheimers, 
post-radiation brain burn from mini-nukes, Naegleria fowleri,

Rocky, been around any

     Warm lakes, ponds, and rock pits
     Mud puddles
     Warm, slow-flowing rivers, especially those with low water levels
     Untreated swimming pools and spas
     Untreated well water or untreated municipal water
     Hot springs and other geothermal water sources
     Thermally polluted water, such as runoff from power plants
     Aquariums
     Soil, including indoor dust
you may have Brain-Eating Amoeba;
http://www.webmd.com/brain/brain-eating-amoeba?page=3#5

reposting the same stuff over and over is a symptom of a more serious 
problem, for sure

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521072 — Re: Rocky's magic science

In article <MPG.30609d94a55eb83998c29d@news.giganews.com>, 
Control@Worldcontrol.com says...


> 
> In article <blugcc-p6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
> says...
> > 
> > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
> >  
> > > And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners 
> > > helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.
> > 
> > Rocky's fairy tale physics hits a new low; what an ignorant, delusional
> > fuckwit.
> > 
> > <snip remaining delusional raving>
> 
> So freon is magic to Rockhead too? If I wasn't sure he's just a troll, I 
> might be worried about him.

I think he's huffing the stuff.

-- 
Checkmate, AUK DoW #1
Official AUK Award Giver-Outer
Copyright © 2015 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521182 — Re: Rocky's magic science

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:07:05 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1"
<Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote:

>In article <MPG.30609d94a55eb83998c29d@news.giganews.com>, 
>Control@Worldcontrol.com says...
>
>> In article <blugcc-p6n.ln1@mail.specsol.com>, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com 
>> says...
>> > 
>> > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >  
>> > > And to be fair others suspect that the liquid freon in the air conditioners 
>> > > helped to turn the nuke into a themo nuclear bomb.
>> > 
>> > Rocky's fairy tale physics hits a new low; what an ignorant, delusional
>> > fuckwit.
>> > 
>> > <snip remaining delusional raving>
>> 
>> So freon is magic to Rockhead too? If I wasn't sure he's just a troll, I 
>> might be worried about him.
>
>I think he's huffing the stuff.

     There is most definitely something wrong with him.

"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he claims nukes were used on
9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web