Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #703300 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-18 05:51 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-18 11:58 -0600 |
| Articles | 12 on this page of 52 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-18 05:51 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 09:15 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-18 10:22 -0500
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 12:52 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 17:58 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 22:09 +0000
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-18 23:19 +0100
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-18 23:01 +0000
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-18 19:59 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 21:08 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 20:59 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment ot de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-09-19 11:20 +1000
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 06:31 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 06:46 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 08:00 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 13:21 +0100
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 10:45 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 13:51 -0500
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-19 20:54 +0100
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 16:50 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 16:30 -0500
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 18:06 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:12 -0700
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 18:17 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 15:19 -0700
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 04:22 -0700
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 18:08 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-19 18:37 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 16:09 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 15:44 -0500
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:13 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:34 +0000
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:30 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 22:01 -0500
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:34 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-20 16:13 +0100
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-19 10:44 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 10:36 -0500
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-19 11:58 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 12:19 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:24 +0000
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 18:29 -0700
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 21:35 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-20 01:53 +0000
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 18:57 -0700
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 22:37 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-19 21:12 -0500
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-19 19:14 -0700
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-20 08:27 +0100
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:37 -0400
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-09-18 10:47 -0700
Re: Mayors of London and New York issue joint call for fossil fuel divestment Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-18 11:58 -0600
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 01:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnust0$e0i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703485 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: > On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: > >> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> > > Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was > growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net > deforestation of land. And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing net drawdown. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 18:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bjrinh.4rh.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #703575 |
On 2018-09-19 6:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >> >>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >> >> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was >> growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >> deforestation of land. > > And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in > the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other > hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing > net drawdown. > so you won't be able to grow any valley zucchinis
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 21:35 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnuth3$123d$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703575 |
On 9/19/2018 9:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: > >> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >> >>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >> >> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was >> growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >> deforestation of land. > > And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in > the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other > hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing > net drawdown. > Nothing but pseudoscience journalist drool here. Move along.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 01:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pnuuje$e0i$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703578 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:35:34 -0400, benj wrote: > On 9/19/2018 9:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >>> >>>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >>> >>> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it >>> was growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >>> deforestation of land. >> >> And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in >> the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other >> hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing >> net drawdown. > > Nothing but pseudosci<SPANK> Soil carbon sequestration http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/solaw/files/thematic_reports/ TR_04b_web.pdf Soil erosion contributes significantly to global carbon emissions https://phys.org/news/2015-06-soil-erosion-contributes-significantly- global.html -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 18:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bjrkck.uff.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #703581 |
On 2018-09-19 6:53 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:35:34 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 9/19/2018 9:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >>>> >>>> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it >>>> was growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >>>> deforestation of land. >>> >>> And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in >>> the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other >>> hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing >>> net drawdown. >> >> Nothing but pseudosci<SPANK> > > Soil carbon sequestration > > http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/solaw/files/thematic_reports/ > TR_04b_web.pdf > > Soil erosion contributes significantly to global carbon emissions > > https://phys.org/news/2015-06-soil-erosion-contributes-significantly- > global.html > i eat meat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 22:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pnv14k$177c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703581 |
On 9/19/2018 9:53 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 21:35:34 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 9/19/2018 9:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >>>> >>>> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it >>>> was growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >>>> deforestation of land. >>> >>> And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in >>> the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other >>> hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing >>> net drawdown. >> >> Nothing but pseudosci<SPANK> > > Soil carbon sequestration > > http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/solaw/files/thematic_reports/ > TR_04b_web.pdf > > Soil erosion contributes significantly to global carbon emissions > > https://phys.org/news/2015-06-soil-erosion-contributes-significantly- > global.html > Since soil runoff corresponds to about 1/6 of the carbon from fossil fuels it's clear that if only climate change can create enough drought to stop all rain, we can be well on the road to saving Gaia! You are totally insane.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 21:12 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pnuvmq$14j8$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703578 |
On 9/19/2018 8:35 PM, benj wrote: > On 9/19/2018 9:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: >> >>> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >>> >>>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >>> >>> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was >>> growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >>> deforestation of land. >> >> And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in >> the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other >> hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing >> net drawdown. >> > Nothing but pseudoscience journalist drool here. > Move along. > Nads is depleted topsoil. Drink a Coke and get that CO2 inside you quick!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-19 19:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <bjrlc1.74i.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #703588 |
On 2018-09-19 7:12 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/19/2018 8:35 PM, benj wrote: >> On 9/19/2018 9:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >>>> >>>> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was >>>> growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >>>> deforestation of land. >>> >>> And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in >>> the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other >>> hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing >>> net drawdown. >>> >> Nothing but pseudoscience journalist drool here. >> Move along. >> > > Nads is depleted topsoil. > Drink a Coke and get that CO2 inside you quick! > get some cows to crap on her
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 08:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nvf3dm.1n9gz7av0ar7fN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #703589 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-19 7:12 PM, Sergio wrote: > > > On 9/19/2018 8:35 PM, benj wrote: > > > >> Paul "Mr Abnormal" Derbyshire in his Nazedga costume > >> pompously pontificated: > >> > >>> Paul Derbyshire in his absurd asstrophysicist Professor > >>> "kensi" Kensington Fu.D. outfit confidently declared: > >>> > >>>> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> > >>>> > >>>> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was > >>>> growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net > >>>> deforestation of land. > >>> > >>> And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in > >>> the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other > >>> hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing > >>> net drawdown. > >>> > >> Nothing but pseudoscience journalist drool here. > >> Move along. > > > > Nads is depleted topsoil. > > Drink a Coke and get that CO2 inside you quick! > > > get some cows to crap on her Cows are world class farters. -- ^Ï^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-20 09:37 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <po07qp$167f$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #703575 |
On 9/19/2018 9:24 PM, Nadegda wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:31:34 -0400, kensi wrote: >> On 9/18/2018 8:59 PM, benj wrote: >>> Burning trees creates CO2 hyopoc<SMACKAK00K!> >> >> Burning trees releases CO2 equal to what the tree drew down while it was >> growing; no more. Thus is carbon neutral, as long as you avoid net >> deforestation of land. > > And topsoil depletion. Otherwise the breakdown of the organic matter in > the net lost topsoil will produce net carbon emissions. If on the other > hand topsoil is being grown, this will be locking up carbon and causing > net drawdown. Hmm, good point. Though, forests tend to be good at building and maintaining topsoil, as long as you avoid deforestation. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-18 10:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <f6367c72-a9c1-45ef-9520-234a1b7b1667@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #703300 |
On Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 2:51:43 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > Great cities know the future is renewable: > > https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html > > -- > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > in here." ~Checkmate GOP Mafia owns P.E. and its worlds biggest polluter .It burns cheap coal,and its smoke goes unfiltered It can not be stopped.It would be easier to impeach Trump than put a stop to Progress Energy.Bert
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JW@me.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-18 11:58 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <P0boD.42969$ZJ2.23508@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #703300 |
On 9/18/2018 3:51 AM, kensi wrote: > Great cities know the future is renewable: > https://www.treehugger.com/fossil-fuels/mayors-london-and-new-york-issue-joint-call-fossil-fuel-divestment.html Last I checked, we live in the present, not the future. In the present, New York City does not produce its own electricity.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web