Groups > sci.physics > #690582 > unrolled thread

We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

Started by	kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post	2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
Last post	2018-07-01 14:06 -0700
Articles	20 on this page of 103 — 20 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

  We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-14 07:14 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-14 11:22 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-14 11:56 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:30 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0700
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-15 04:54 -0400
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:06 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-15 21:27 -0500
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 02:49 +0000
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:25 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:31 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:34 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 01:23 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:30 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-16 01:38 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-16 08:28 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 12:28 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-06-16 05:48 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 02:19 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:45 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:11 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:23 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 14:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:42 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-16 19:48 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-16 13:24 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-16 20:25 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 16:59 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:43 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-15 22:54 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:10 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 00:51 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 22:05 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change will <willscranton@butchersboulevard.commypanprofile> - 2018-06-23 06:41 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-15 22:25 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 10:44 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-16 11:34 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-16 13:25 -0400
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 21:16 -0500
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-06-24 22:39 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-24 22:49 -0500
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-25 00:17 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-25 13:44 -0500
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:46 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 05:10 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 23:19 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-25 02:42 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-15 21:08 -0700
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 06:03 +1000
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-23 16:47 -0400
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-24 15:36 +1000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-24 13:09 -0400
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 06:35 +1000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-24 21:50 +0000
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 14:55 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:48 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 16:50 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:10 -0700
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:13 -0700
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:21 -0700
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:27 -0700
                              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 18:38 -0700
                                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 19:27 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-25 10:18 +1000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-24 17:20 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-30 13:12 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-30 08:50 -0500
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 14:08 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 09:02 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-30 10:18 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 04:01 -0400
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-03 05:04 -0400
                          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-07-03 23:31 -0400
                            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 05:17 -0400
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-03 03:37 -0700
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:12 +0000
                        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-07-04 11:21 -0400
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-05 23:12 -0500
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-30 12:13 -0500
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-25 18:36 -0400
    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-01 15:03 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:21 -0400
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:38 -0700
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 11:47 -0400
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 08:51 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-07-01 13:16 -0400
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:18 -0700
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:16 +0000
          Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 17:20 +0000
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 10:22 -0700
              Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:06 +0000
                Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:09 -0700
                  Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-07-01 18:10 +0000
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 11:12 -0700
                    Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-07-01 19:51 +0100
                      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-07-02 10:45 -0700
            Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-07-04 15:11 +0000
      Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-07-01 15:01 -0600
        Re: We are almost certainly underestimating the economic benefits of climate change Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-07-01 14:06 -0700

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →

#691779

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2018-06-24 21:16 -0500
Message-ID	<pgpja0$cmt$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#690850

On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>
>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>
>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>
>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
> 
> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
> 

          is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691782

From	Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup>
Date	2018-06-24 22:39 -0400
Message-ID	<pgpkm8$f2q$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#691779

On 6/24/2018 10:16 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>
>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>>
>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
>>
>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
>>
>  is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?

Sergio is desperate.  No imagination!  All he does is talk.  He 
graduated last in his class--dummy!

I hear that sleepy eyes Sergio will be fired like a dog!  I can't 
imagine what is taking so long!

Will Sergio stab a guy and become an award winning surgeon and run for 
president?

Hmmm?

-- 
Dinsdale

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691790

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2018-06-24 22:49 -0500
Message-ID	<pgpoo4$jf0$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#691782

On 6/24/2018 9:39 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> On 6/24/2018 10:16 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>>>
>>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
>>>
>>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
>>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
>>>
>>  is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?
> 
> Sergio is desperate.  No imagination!  All he does is talk.  He
> graduated last in his class--dummy!
> 
> I hear that sleepy eyes Sergio will be fired like a dog!  I can't
> imagine what is taking so long!
> 
> Will Sergio stab a guy and become an award winning surgeon and run for
> president?
> 
> Hmmm?
> 

yep, Dimsdale
     using same word set as BabyNads/kensipupa,
    similar sentence lengths [short thoughts caused by bong-brain]

but still, there is just not quite enough there, especially if from
Canada, that is chock full of stoner americans that do not want to work,
with some left over stoner frenchies from an indian war, ugh -  smoke-um
piece pipe .

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691792

From	mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie>
Date	2018-06-25 00:17 -0400
Message-ID	<pgpqcm$l75$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#691790

On 6/24/2018 11:49 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 6/24/2018 9:39 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/24/2018 10:16 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>>>>
>>>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
>>>>
>>>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
>>>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
>>>>
>>>   is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?
>>
>> Sergio is desperate.  No imagination!  All he does is talk.  He
>> graduated last in his class--dummy!
>>
>> I hear that sleepy eyes Sergio will be fired like a dog!  I can't
>> imagine what is taking so long!
>>
>> Will Sergio stab a guy and become an award winning surgeon and run for
>> president?
>>
>> Hmmm?
>>
> 
> yep, Dimsdale
>       using same word set as BabyNads/kensipupa,
>      similar sentence lengths [short thoughts caused by bong-brain]
> 
> but still, there is just not quite enough there, especially if from
> Canada, that is chock full of stoner americans that do not want to work,
> with some left over stoner frenchies from an indian war, ugh -  smoke-um
> piece pipe .

President quotes.  3rd grade insults.  Familiar?  I just replaced the 
insultee names with sergio.

Creative innit?  Real true American patriot stuff that any true American 
should remember and carve, in the most beautiful calligraphic font 
imaginable, on the side of the holy mountain in Philadelphia where jesus 
wrote the constitution in 40 days and 40 nights and gave it to the great 
general Stonewall Jackson to create America, which now has the greatest 
president the world has ever seen, who can stop global warming and 
receive a Nobel Piece Prize with a secret memo.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691831

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date	2018-06-25 13:44 -0500
Message-ID	<pgrd5k$1dej$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#691792

On 6/24/2018 11:17 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 6/24/2018 11:49 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 6/24/2018 9:39 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>> On 6/24/2018 10:16 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
>>>>>
>>>>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
>>>>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
>>>>>
>>>>   is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?
>>>
>>> Sergio is desperate.  No imagination!  All he does is talk.  He
>>> graduated last in his class--dummy!
>>>
>>> I hear that sleepy eyes Sergio will be fired like a dog!  I can't
>>> imagine what is taking so long!
>>>
>>> Will Sergio stab a guy and become an award winning surgeon and run for
>>> president?
>>>
>>> Hmmm?
>>>
>>
>> yep, Dimsdale
>>       using same word set as BabyNads/kensipupa,
>>      similar sentence lengths [short thoughts caused by bong-brain]
>>
>> but still, there is just not quite enough there, especially if from
>> Canada, that is chock full of stoner americans that do not want to work,
>> with some left over stoner frenchies from an indian war, ugh -  smoke-um
>> piece pipe .
> 
> President quotes.  3rd grade insults.  Familiar?  I just replaced the
> insultee names with sergio.
> 
> Creative innit?  Real true American patriot stuff that any true American
> should remember and carve, in the most beautiful calligraphic font
> imaginable, on the side of the holy mountain in Philadelphia where jesus
> wrote the constitution in 40 days and 40 nights and gave it to the great
> general Stonewall Jackson to create America, which now has the greatest
> president the world has ever seen, who can stop global warming and
> receive a Nobel Piece Prize with a secret memo.
> 

yep, and Our Dear Leader with orange hair even gives creepy Hillary the
Creeps, and he knocked Harriet Tubman, a dead person, off the $20 bill
which belongs to Andrew Jackson, and now Trump intends on building a
wall between Canada and USA using unemployed Canadians, which is most of
them, to keep out american leftist that left USA for Canada, out of the
USA, unless they want to pay extra taxes,and sign a no whining contract
for 20 years, and only migrate to California.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691832

From	% <persent@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-25 11:46 -0700
Message-ID	<bco2qd.i4m.19.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to	#691831

On 2018-06-25 11:44 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 6/24/2018 11:17 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 6/24/2018 11:49 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 6/24/2018 9:39 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>> On 6/24/2018 10:16 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
>>>>>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
>>>>>>
>>>>>    is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?
>>>>
>>>> Sergio is desperate.  No imagination!  All he does is talk.  He
>>>> graduated last in his class--dummy!
>>>>
>>>> I hear that sleepy eyes Sergio will be fired like a dog!  I can't
>>>> imagine what is taking so long!
>>>>
>>>> Will Sergio stab a guy and become an award winning surgeon and run for
>>>> president?
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm?
>>>>
>>>
>>> yep, Dimsdale
>>>        using same word set as BabyNads/kensipupa,
>>>       similar sentence lengths [short thoughts caused by bong-brain]
>>>
>>> but still, there is just not quite enough there, especially if from
>>> Canada, that is chock full of stoner americans that do not want to work,
>>> with some left over stoner frenchies from an indian war, ugh -  smoke-um
>>> piece pipe .
>>
>> President quotes.  3rd grade insults.  Familiar?  I just replaced the
>> insultee names with sergio.
>>
>> Creative innit?  Real true American patriot stuff that any true American
>> should remember and carve, in the most beautiful calligraphic font
>> imaginable, on the side of the holy mountain in Philadelphia where jesus
>> wrote the constitution in 40 days and 40 nights and gave it to the great
>> general Stonewall Jackson to create America, which now has the greatest
>> president the world has ever seen, who can stop global warming and
>> receive a Nobel Piece Prize with a secret memo.
>>
> 
> yep, and Our Dear Leader with orange hair even gives creepy Hillary the
> Creeps, and he knocked Harriet Tubman, a dead person, off the $20 bill
> which belongs to Andrew Jackson, and now Trump intends on building a
> wall between Canada and USA using unemployed Canadians, which is most of
> them, to keep out american leftist that left USA for Canada, out of the
> USA, unless they want to pay extra taxes,and sign a no whining contract
> for 20 years, and only migrate to California.
> 
> 
so

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691834

From	Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-25 11:54 -0700
Message-ID	<MPG.359ada2dba995d7a9940ac@news.altopia.com>
In reply to	#691832

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bco2qd.i4m.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com 
says...


> so

What?

Maybe you rike some SLAPPY-SLAPPY (tm) today?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691796

From	Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date	2018-06-25 05:10 +0000
Message-ID	<pgptg1$n98$44@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#691790

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 22:49:24 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 6/24/2018 9:39 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/24/2018 10:16 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>>>>
>>>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
>>>>
>>>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
>>>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
>>>>
>>>  is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?
>> 
>> Sergio is desperate.  No imagination!  All he does is talk.  He
>> graduated last in his class--dummy!
>> 
>> I hear that sleepy eyes Sergio will be fired like a dog!  I can't
>> imagine what is taking so long!
>> 
>> Will Sergio stab a guy and become an award winning surgeon and run for
>> president?
>> 
>> Hmmm?
>> 
>> 
> yep, Dimsdale
>      using same word set as BabyNads/kensi<SMACKAKOOK!>

*Still* seeing your Usenet Ladies and Mistresses everywhere, illucid 
idiot? Yeah, you are, you pwned pustulent painbrain.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691800

From	Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-24 23:19 -0700
Message-ID	<MPG.359a29449e363dc099409b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to	#691790

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pgpoo4$jf0$1@gioia.aioe.org>, invalid@invalid.com 
says...


> 
> On 6/24/2018 9:39 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> > On 6/24/2018 10:16 PM, Sergio wrote:
> >> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
> >>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
> >>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
> >>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You're not in science.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
> >>>>>
> >>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
> >>>
> >>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
> >>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
> >>>
> >>  is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi pupa ?
> > 
> > Sergio is desperate.  No imagination!  All he does is talk.  He
> > graduated last in his class--dummy!
> > 
> > I hear that sleepy eyes Sergio will be fired like a dog!  I can't
> > imagine what is taking so long!
> > 
> > Will Sergio stab a guy and become an award winning surgeon and run for
> > president?
> > 
> > Hmmm?
> > 
> 
> yep, Dimsdale
>      using same word set as BabyNads/kensipupa,
>     similar sentence lengths [short thoughts caused by bong-brain]
> 
> but still, there is just not quite enough there, especially if from
> Canada, that is chock full of stoner americans that do not want to work,
> with some left over stoner frenchies from an indian war, ugh -  smoke-um
> piece pipe .

Dinsdale ain't The Kensinads Sock Sisters.  Trust me on this one.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691783

From	Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date	2018-06-25 02:42 +0000
Message-ID	<pgpkr8$n98$41@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#691779

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 21:16:35 -0500, Sergio wrote:

> On 6/16/2018 10:34 AM, Dinsdale wrote:
>> On 6/16/2018 10:44 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 6/15/2018 10:54 PM, Dinsdale wrote:
>>>> On 6/15/2018 10:27 PM, Bricked wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're not in science.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neither are you dimsdale.
>>>>
>>>> You have no way to know.  Best not to speak out of ignorance.
>>>>
>>> A rule Baby Nads and "kensi" NEVER follow.
>> 
>> And rigorously never followed by idjit benjies due to very many (and
>> very beautiful) pledge of allegiance to deeply held dumnass.
>
>           is Dimsdale yet another instance of Baby Nads and kensi
> p<SMACKAKOOK!>

Still seeing your Usenet Ladies and Mistresses everywhere, you paranoid 
fuckwit?

Yeah, you are. That's how pwned you are.

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690814

From	Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-15 21:09 -0700
Message-ID	<MPG.358e2d39be8c0674993e71@news.altopia.com>
In reply to	#690806

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <ibt8id9igeh96dv4q3cvl8g6dqpaah1qmu@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 22:06:20 -0400, Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> wrote:
> 
> >On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> >> This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
> >
> >You're not in science.
> 
> Neither are you dimsdale.

YAP!  YAP!  YAP!

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#690813

From	Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-15 21:08 -0700
Message-ID	<MPG.358e2d1d7c04e8dd993e70@news.altopia.com>
In reply to	#690804

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pg1rav$bej$1@gioia.aioe.org>, yup@ayup.yup 
says...


> 
> On 6/15/2018 9:34 PM, benj wrote:
> > This is all OLD news to anyone in science.
> 
> You're not in science.

I'll bet he's not in Kansas, either.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691656

From	Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
Date	2018-06-24 06:03 +1000
Message-ID	<fp7nd7Fo2mkU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#690797

On 15/06/2018 6:54 PM, Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>
>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks 
>>
> 
> That's ok, so are the models that predict the climate change.
> 
> https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/ 
> 
> 
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought--computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html 
> 

**As long as you continue to fail to acquire your knowledge from 
CREDIBLE scientific sources, you'll continue to appear the fool that you 
are. Dodgy news sites are not sources of science. You are a sad, 
pathetic indictment of the US education system.


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691664

From	benj <benj@nobody.net>
Date	2018-06-23 16:47 -0400
Message-ID	<IlyXC.167227$Jm2.103196@fx24.iad>
In reply to	#691656

On 6/23/2018 4:03 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 15/06/2018 6:54 PM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>
>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks 
>>>
>>
>> That's ok, so are the models that predict the climate change.
>>
>> https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/ 
>>
>>
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought--computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html 
>>
> 
> **As long as you continue to fail to acquire your knowledge from 
> CREDIBLE scientific sources, you'll continue to appear the fool that you 
> are. Dodgy news sites are not sources of science. You are a sad, 
> pathetic indictment of the US education system.

Listen to sheep shearing wisdom from Trevor of Oz!

Scout, if you are ever to have a true understanding of "Climate Change" 
like Trevor and Dr. Kensi, then you should start looking that the links 
Dr.Kensi posts proving climate change. She has a Ph.D. in physics which 
unquestionably makes her an authority on proper sources of scientific 
data. And no doubt this is where Trevor gets his information too.

Recent "kensi" science sources: Foreign Affairs (CFR) magazine, 
ecowatch.com, SkepticalScience.com (failed cartoonist), grist.org,CNN, 
Economics.com, TheGuardian.com, counterpunch.org, NYMag.com, Vox.com, 
NatioinalGeographic.com, Livescience.com, CNN (again), USAToday.com, 
Ecowatch.com and on and on...

These are ALL PH.D. level science source papers picked by Dr. Kensi for 
irrefutable proof that the science of climate change is "settled" and 
only a "denier" would try to say otherwise. So Scout, if you want to not 
appear to be the fool, start using actual Ph.D level sources of 
information and science as Trevor and Dr. Kensi do. Other wise just STFU 
and let them have the floor!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691717

From	Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
Date	2018-06-24 15:36 +1000
Message-ID	<fp8ouqFtsmnU1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#691664

On 24/06/2018 6:47 AM, benj wrote:
> On 6/23/2018 4:03 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 15/06/2018 6:54 PM, Scout wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
>>> news:pftimg$19qo$1@gioia.aioe.org...
>>>> The models that inform climate policymaking are fatally flawed:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2018/6/8/17437104/climate-change-global-warming-models-risks 
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's ok, so are the models that predict the climate change.
>>>
>>> https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/global-warming-who-are-the-deniers-now/ 
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2420783/Worlds-climate-scientists-confess-Global-warming-just-QUARTER-thought--computers-got-effects-greenhouse-gases-wrong.html 
>>>
>>
>> **As long as you continue to fail to acquire your knowledge from 
>> CREDIBLE scientific sources, you'll continue to appear the fool that 
>> you are. Dodgy news sites are not sources of science. You are a sad, 
>> pathetic indictment of the US education system.
> 
> Listen to sheep shearing wisdom from Trevor of Oz!

**Sorry to disappoint you, but I know very little about sheep shearing. 
OTOH, unlike you, I do know a little about science and, more 
importantly, I know where to find information about scientific topics 
that is reliable. Unlike Scout's bullshit and your yappy noises.

> 
> Scout, if you are ever to have a true understanding of "Climate Change" 
> like Trevor and Dr. Kensi, then you should start looking that the links 
> Dr.Kensi posts proving climate change. She has a Ph.D. in physics which 
> unquestionably makes her an authority on proper sources of scientific 
> data. And no doubt this is where Trevor gets his information too.

**I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't read 
it's posts. I am focused on correcting your abject ignorance (and 
Scout's). Scout has an excuse - he knows nothing about science and never 
claimed to understand it. You, OTOH, claim to know about science, yet 
you display no ability to understand basic principles. Perhaps you 
should follow Scout's example and admit you are a scientific ignoramus.

-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691746

From	kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date	2018-06-24 13:09 -0400
Message-ID	<pgoj8h$s9k$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to	#691717

On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't read 
> it's posts.

ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!

> I am focused on correcting your abject ignorance (and 
> Scout's). Scout has an excuse - he knows nothing about science and never 
> claimed to understand it. You, OTOH, claim to know about science, yet 
> you display no ability to understand basic principles. Perhaps you 
> should follow Scout's example and admit you are a scientific ignoramus.

SPANKY-SPANKY! on benj

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691760

From	Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
Date	2018-06-25 06:35 +1000
Message-ID	<fpadkgF98o8U1@mid.individual.net>
In reply to	#691746

On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't 
>> read it's posts.
> 
> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!

**Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.

> 
>> I am focused on correcting your abject ignorance (and Scout's). Scout 
>> has an excuse - he knows nothing about science and never claimed to 
>> understand it. You, OTOH, claim to know about science, yet you display 
>> no ability to understand basic principles. Perhaps you should follow 
>> Scout's example and admit you are a scientific ignoramus.
> 
> SPANKY-SPANKY! on benj
> 

**Benjis just Sergio's lap-dog. Yappy-yappy.


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691762

From	Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date	2018-06-24 21:50 +0000
Message-ID	<pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>
In reply to	#691760

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:

> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>> read it's posts.
>> 
>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
> 
> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.

Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use 
"they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many 
people.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

"By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with 
you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691763

From	% <persent@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-24 14:55 -0700
Message-ID	<bclpgt.opg.17.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to	#691762

On 2018-06-24 2:50 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 06:35:27 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> 
>> On 25/06/2018 3:09 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 6/24/2018 1:36 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> **I have no idea where Kensi obtains it's information from. I don't
>>>> read it's posts.
>>>
>>> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
>>
>> **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> 
> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use
> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many
> people.
> 
no its not only people with a phobia about it care

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#691769

From	Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date	2018-06-24 16:48 -0700
Message-ID	<MPG.3599cdadaa31309999406b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to	#691762

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pgp3mm$n98$33@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> >> ExCUSE me? What do you mean, "it"?!
> > 
> > **Since I don't know your sex, I chose to use that descriptor.
> 
> Protip: if you want to refer to a person in a gender-neutral way, use 
> "they", "them", etc., not "it". "It" is considered extremely rude by many 
> people.
> 

Is it?

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Next page →

csiph-web

We are almost certainly underestimating the economic risks of climate change

Contents

#691779

#691782

#691790

#691792

#691831

#691832

#691834

#691796

#691800

#691783

#690814

#690813

#691656

#691664

#691717

#691746

#691760

#691762

#691763

#691769