Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #685053 > unrolled thread

UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-05-12 08:57 -0400
Last post2018-05-12 19:13 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 155 — 13 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-12 08:57 -0400
    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 13:55 -0400
      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-12 18:55 +0000
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:03 -0700
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 15:16 -0400
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:52 -0700
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 19:02 -0400
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 19:13 -0400
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:35 -0700
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 20:06 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:43 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 21:01 -0500
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 20:53 -0500
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 11:12 -0700
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-05-14 18:57 -0500
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-14 22:40 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:00 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-15 21:59 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 06:05 -0700
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-20 13:13 -0400
                          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 23:54 -0400
                            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-21 09:08 -0400
                            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 06:47 -0700
                            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-26 09:11 +1000
                          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 06:12 -0700
                            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-22 00:27 -0400
                              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-22 07:59 -0400
                                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:29 -0700
                              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:00 +1000
                                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 11:17 +1000
                                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:36 -0700
                                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:11 -0400
                                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-26 08:48 +1000
                                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-26 08:51 +1000
                                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 00:22 -0400
                                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 14:31 +1000
                                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 14:39 +1000
                                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-23 00:50 -0400
                                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-23 15:04 +1000
                              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 06:22 -0700
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:54 -0700
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:58 -0700
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-12 15:14 -0600
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:12 -0400
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-12 17:28 -0600
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 16:35 -0700
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 23:57 -0700
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 10:48 -0500
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 19:05 -0500
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:30 -0400
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:54 -0400
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:19 -0700
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 13:34 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:40 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 13:58 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 11:09 -0700
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 10:46 -0700
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 19:54 +0000
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:13 -0700
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 17:58 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 15:48 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 18:55 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:02 -0700
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-14 00:43 +0000
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 17:45 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 21:30 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 18:32 -0700
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 21:36 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-14 03:43 +0000
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:53 -0700
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 09:48 -0700
      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 08:56 +1000
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:20 -0400
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 16:25 -0700
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-05-13 09:32 +1000
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 19:02 -0500
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:33 -0400
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:32 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 12:01 -0500
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 19:57 +0000
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:13 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:24 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-14 10:46 -0500
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 12:58 -0700
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:19 +0000
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:21 -0700
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:34 +0000
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:45 -0700
                          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:49 -0700
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:47 -0700
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 01:43 -0400
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 14:35 -0500
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 12:37 -0700
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-15 20:19 -0400
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 19:45 -0500
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 21:03 -0400
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 18:09 -0700
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 01:19 +0000
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 18:24 -0700
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 21:29 -0400
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 18:30 -0700
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 01:58 +0000
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 19:13 -0700
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 11:54 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 11:14 -0500
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:01 +0000
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:14 -0700
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 19:59 +0000
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:14 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:25 -0700
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:36 +0000
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:46 -0700
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:49 -0700
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 16:19 -0700
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 21:40 -0400
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 02:01 +0000
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 19:13 -0700
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 22:41 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 02:56 +0000
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 01:42 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 01:52 -0400
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:37 -0400
                          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:40 -0400
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 10:42 -0500
                          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:33 -0400
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:12 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:36 -0400
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:17 -0400
                          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:17 -0400
                            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-15 15:17 -0500
                              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-15 22:55 -0400
                                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-15 20:19 -0700
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:39 -0400
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:11 -0400
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:06 +0000
                          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:15 -0700
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 05:38 -0700
                      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-13 10:37 -0400
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-13 12:17 -0400
                        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:35 -0400
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:01 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 22:06 -0500
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 12:06 -0400
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-13 11:57 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-13 11:22 -0500
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-14 11:19 -0400
                  Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 20:08 +0000
                    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-13 13:15 -0700
              Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-12 22:01 -0500
                Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-13 03:12 +0000
    Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-12 12:29 -0600
      Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-12 19:05 -0400
        Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 16:09 -0700
          Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-12 21:42 -0400
            Re: UN Climate Change Launches First-Ever Annual Report % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-12 19:13 -0700

Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8  Next page →

#685186

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2018-05-13 01:52 -0400
Message-ID<hjkffd5o9bnvonf8ubtp01g3l8llsiu3q0@4ax.com>
In reply to#685184
On Sun, 13 May 2018 01:42:15 -0400, Wally W. wrote:

>On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>
>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>> necessarily bad.
>>
>>It sure is.
>
>That is a ridiculous statement.
>
>*All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>
>Was it bad when glaciers retreated from where you are living now?

Why do greenies think in black-and-white?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685202

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-13 10:37 -0400
Message-ID<pd9iik$94k$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#685186
On 5/13/2018 1:52 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 01:42:15 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>> Was it bad when glaciers retreated from where you are living now?
> 
> Why do greenies think in black-and-white?

Why do k0oks follow up to their own articles? And post more than one 
followup to the *same* article, and and and and and?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685224

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-13 12:40 -0400
Message-ID<KTZJC.125780$mS3.32196@fx04.iad>
In reply to#685202
On 5/13/2018 10:37 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/13/2018 1:52 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 01:42:15 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>>> Was it bad when glaciers retreated from where you are living now?
>>
>> Why do greenies think in black-and-white?
> 
> Why do k0oks follow up to their own articles? And post more than one 
> followup to the *same* article, and and and and and?
> 
Says the biggest cross-posting propaganda reposter on the planet.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685204

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-13 10:42 -0500
Message-ID<pd9mdv$g3u$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#685186
On 5/13/2018 12:52 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 01:42:15 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>
>>> It sure is.
>>
>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>
>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>>
>> Was it bad when glaciers retreated from where you are living now?
> 
> Why do greenies think in black-and-white?
> 


and why are greenies always negative ?  they sell fear.

Increased CO2 makes more plants grow faster larger, making the planet
greener, more water vapor in the air.

the Climate Change, or Glowball Worming, the greenies sell their ideas
based upon fear, and emotion.

history shows us glaciers grow and shrink inspite of man.

google ice ages


this graph shows we are due for another ice age now;

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Ice_Age_Temperature.png


   Nads is Hillary's mouth piece.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685220

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-13 12:33 -0400
Message-ID<_NZJC.137701$br4.93417@fx34.iad>
In reply to#685204
On 5/13/2018 11:42 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/13/2018 12:52 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 01:42:15 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>>
>>>> It sure is.
>>>
>>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>>
>>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>>>
>>> Was it bad when glaciers retreated from where you are living now?
>>
>> Why do greenies think in black-and-white?
>>
> 
> 
> and why are greenies always negative ?  they sell fear.
> 
> Increased CO2 makes more plants grow faster larger, making the planet
> greener, more water vapor in the air.
> 
> the Climate Change, or Glowball Worming, the greenies sell their ideas
> based upon fear, and emotion.
> 
> history shows us glaciers grow and shrink inspite of man.
> 
> google ice ages
> 
> 
> this graph shows we are due for another ice age now;
> 
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Ice_Age_Temperature.png
> 
> 
>     Nads is Hillary's mouth piece.
> 
is "mouth piece" something like a "cock holster" (That is a lib joke I 
saw on TV once...they think it's hilarious)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685211

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-13 12:12 -0400
Message-ID<0uZJC.92092$nq5.81947@fx36.iad>
In reply to#685186
On 5/13/2018 1:52 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 01:42:15 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>
>>> It sure is.
>>
>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>
>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>>
>> Was it bad when glaciers retreated from where you are living now?
> 
> Why do greenies think in black-and-white?
> 
They are binary and don't do quantity.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685201

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-13 10:36 -0400
Message-ID<pd9igv$94k$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#685184
On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
> 
>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>> necessarily bad.
>>
>> It sure is.
> 
> That is a ridiculous statement.
> 
> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?

No, the particular climate change happening now is bad.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685213

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2018-05-13 12:17 -0400
Message-ID<utogfd18l51os0im7vur0i13csc69ns3r7@4ax.com>
In reply to#685201
On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:36:16 -0400, kensi wrote:

>On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>> 
>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>
>>> It sure is.
>> 
>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>> 
>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>
>No, the particular climate change happening now is bad.

There is only one climate change happening now?

Where is it?

If more than one climate change is happening now, are they *all* bad?

Never mind your dodgy "all changes are bad in some way."

The question is: Are they *all* bad enough to put effort into stopping
*all* climate changes *everywhere*?

If so, what makes you think that is possible?

How do you know in what direction a climate would be changing in a
particular location if humans had *no* influence?

How do you know we are (ever so slightly) nudging *that* climate in
the "wrong" direction?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685405

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-14 11:17 -0400
Message-ID<zMhKC.40151$p05.40145@fx28.iad>
In reply to#685213
On 5/13/2018 12:17 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:36:16 -0400, kensi wrote:
> 
>> On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>
>>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>>
>>>> It sure is.
>>>
>>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>>
>>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>>
>> No, the particular climate change happening now is bad.
> 
> There is only one climate change happening now?
> 
> Where is it?
> 
> If more than one climate change is happening now, are they *all* bad?
> 
> Never mind your dodgy "all changes are bad in some way."
> 
> The question is: Are they *all* bad enough to put effort into stopping
> *all* climate changes *everywhere*?
> 
> If so, what makes you think that is possible?
> 
> How do you know in what direction a climate would be changing in a
> particular location if humans had *no* influence?
> 
> How do you know we are (ever so slightly) nudging *that* climate in
> the "wrong" direction?
> 
"Kanzi" knows becuase "she" imagined it. Proof enough for "her"!

For "kanzi" ALL change is "bad". She says "stop the world, I want to get 
off!"

If that sounds insane to you, that would be because it is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685628

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-15 15:17 -0500
Message-ID<pdff9m$e71$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#685405
On 5/14/2018 10:17 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/13/2018 12:17 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:36:16 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>>>
>>>>> It sure is.
>>>>
>>>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>>>
>>>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>>>
>>> No, the particular climate change happening now is bad.
>>
>> There is only one climate change happening now?
>>
>> Where is it?
>>
>> If more than one climate change is happening now, are they *all* bad?
>>
>> Never mind your dodgy "all changes are bad in some way."
>>
>> The question is: Are they *all* bad enough to put effort into stopping
>> *all* climate changes *everywhere*?
>>
>> If so, what makes you think that is possible?
>>
>> How do you know in what direction a climate would be changing in a
>> particular location if humans had *no* influence?
>>
>> How do you know we are (ever so slightly) nudging *that* climate in
>> the "wrong" direction?
>>
> "Kanzi" knows becuase "she" imagined it. Proof enough for "her"!
> 
> For "kanzi" ALL change is "bad". She says "stop the world, I want to get
> off!"
> 
> If that sounds insane to you, that would be because it is.


Kanzi ? the one born oct 28, 1980 ?    No wonder, that explains a lot

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685720

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-15 22:55 -0400
Message-ID<g4NKC.64110$nT1.40325@fx20.iad>
In reply to#685628
On 5/15/2018 4:17 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 5/14/2018 10:17 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/13/2018 12:17 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:36:16 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It sure is.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
>>>>
>>>> No, the particular climate change happening now is bad.
>>>
>>> There is only one climate change happening now?
>>>
>>> Where is it?
>>>
>>> If more than one climate change is happening now, are they *all* bad?
>>>
>>> Never mind your dodgy "all changes are bad in some way."
>>>
>>> The question is: Are they *all* bad enough to put effort into stopping
>>> *all* climate changes *everywhere*?
>>>
>>> If so, what makes you think that is possible?
>>>
>>> How do you know in what direction a climate would be changing in a
>>> particular location if humans had *no* influence?
>>>
>>> How do you know we are (ever so slightly) nudging *that* climate in
>>> the "wrong" direction?
>>>
>> "Kanzi" knows becuase "she" imagined it. Proof enough for "her"!
>>
>> For "kanzi" ALL change is "bad". She says "stop the world, I want to get
>> off!"
>>
>> If that sounds insane to you, that would be because it is.
> 
> 
> Kanzi ? the one born oct 28, 1980 ?    No wonder, that explains a lot
> 
<Snort>!
Sergio you are so sharp. That makes it all the more humorous when the 
warmballers call you stupid! Yep, that's the one! The talking wonder!
(Added humor: When I stared using this name "Kensi" posted a complaint 
about....wait for it...Me MISSPELLING her name!!!! Bwahahahahahaha! 
Libs, gotta love 'em!)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685726

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-15 20:19 -0700
Message-ID<b9ctgp.pvs.17.1@news.alt.net>
In reply to#685720
On 2018-05-15 7:55 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/15/2018 4:17 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 5/14/2018 10:17 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/13/2018 12:17 PM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:36:16 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>>>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It sure is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in 
>>>>>> history?
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the particular climate change happening now is bad.
>>>>
>>>> There is only one climate change happening now?
>>>>
>>>> Where is it?
>>>>
>>>> If more than one climate change is happening now, are they *all* bad?
>>>>
>>>> Never mind your dodgy "all changes are bad in some way."
>>>>
>>>> The question is: Are they *all* bad enough to put effort into stopping
>>>> *all* climate changes *everywhere*?
>>>>
>>>> If so, what makes you think that is possible?
>>>>
>>>> How do you know in what direction a climate would be changing in a
>>>> particular location if humans had *no* influence?
>>>>
>>>> How do you know we are (ever so slightly) nudging *that* climate in
>>>> the "wrong" direction?
>>>>
>>> "Kanzi" knows becuase "she" imagined it. Proof enough for "her"!
>>>
>>> For "kanzi" ALL change is "bad". She says "stop the world, I want to get
>>> off!"
>>>
>>> If that sounds insane to you, that would be because it is.
>>
>>
>> Kanzi ? the one born oct 28, 1980 ?    No wonder, that explains a lot
>>
> <Snort>!
> Sergio you are so sharp. That makes it all the more humorous when the 
> warmballers call you stupid! Yep, that's the one! The talking wonder!
> (Added humor: When I stared using this name "Kensi" posted a complaint 
> about....wait for it...Me MISSPELLING her name!!!! Bwahahahahahaha! 
> Libs, gotta love 'em!)


that makes her really old

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685223

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-13 12:39 -0400
Message-ID<SSZJC.125779$mS3.68547@fx04.iad>
In reply to#685201
On 5/13/2018 10:36 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>>> necessarily bad.
>>>
>>> It sure is.
>>
>> That is a ridiculous statement.
>>
>> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
> 
> No, the particular climate change happening now is bad.
> 
You can't tax the past, Wally, you can only tax the present.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685210

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-13 12:11 -0400
Message-ID<PsZJC.92067$nq5.3759@fx36.iad>
In reply to#685184
On 5/13/2018 1:42 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:56:33 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
> 
>>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>>> necessarily bad.
>>
>> It sure is.
> 
> That is a ridiculous statement.
> 
> *All* climate change is bad *everywhere* ... at every time in history?
> 
> Was it bad when glaciers retreated from where you are living now?
> 
All us progressives spoke out loudly (as best we could with the language 
of the time) against the climate change that was melting the mile of ice 
over my house, but none of the conservative scum would listen to us!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685277

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-13 20:06 +0000
Message-ID<pda5rp$jvq$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#685210
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:11:24 -0400, benj wrote:

> All us progressives

What the fuck?

What's that horrid stench?

Oh my Zeus. It's pure concentrated 100-proof bullshit!

<excuse me while I click "delete" then go open a window>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685284

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-13 13:15 -0700
Message-ID<b96rtv.c4r.17.6@news.alt.net>
In reply to#685277
On 2018-05-13 1:06 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sun, 13 May 2018 12:11:24 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> All us progressives
> 
> What the fuck?
> 
> What's that horrid stench?
> 
> Oh my Zeus. It's pure concentrated 100-proof bullshit!
> 
> <excuse me while I click "delete" then go open a window>
> 
rerun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685196

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-13 05:38 -0700
Message-ID<b9614c.v4g.19.2@news.alt.net>
In reply to#685171
On 2018-05-12 7:56 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 12 May 2018 22:41:01 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 02:01:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 21:40:54 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 01:19:01 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>> melt!
>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 21:03:59 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 13 May 2018 08:56:29 +1000, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13/05/2018 3:55 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 08:57:03 -0400, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> UN Climate Change today launched its first-ever Annual Report,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe it will also be its last?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Unlikely.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> laying out the key 2017 achievements and pointing to the future
>>>>>>>>> of the climate change process. "Climate Change is the single
>>>>>>>>> biggest threat to life, security and prosperity on Earth,"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's deluded.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Well, no, it isn't. It's quite factual.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is ludicrous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are many fast-acting threats "to life, security and prosperity
>>>>>> on Earth," including:
>>>>>> - Nuclear war
>>>>>
>>>>> Disarmament
>>>>>
>>>>>> - Pandemics
>>>>>
>>>>> Universal health care
>>>>
>>>> "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple,
>>>> and wrong."
>>>> - H. L. Mencken
>>>
>>> It works great in the developed world. Perhaps it's time we in the USA
>>> joined the developed world at last?
>>
>> Health care treating infected people is like closing the barn door after
>> the horse escaped.
>>
>> Keeping people safe from outbreaks to begin with is a pre-emptive
>> approach.
> 
> All the more reason for universal healthcare. Otherwise poor people avoid
> checkups and routine screenings and tests and stuff, to avoid the expense,
> only to get seriously ill and land in the ER eventually.
> 
>> For example: figuring out where and when to use DDT.
> 
> Erm, nowhere and never? Unless you like the idea of a world without birds.
> 
>>>>>> - Supervolcanoes
>>>>>
>>>>> Monitoring is all we can do there.
>>>>
>>>> It's all *you* know how to do,
>>>
>>> What would you suggest then?
>>
>> Spending money on research toward defusing these bombs instead of *only*
>> monitoring them.
> 
> No, no, I mean your idea for how to defuse them.
> 
>>>>> Newsflash, kooky: the earth has finite fossil fuels and we've already
>>>>> used more than half of them up. We will *necessarily* transition to
>>>>> cleaner energy sources. The only choice we get is when, and maybe how
>>>>> messily. Might as well be now and as smoothly as we can manage it. And
>>>>> that will deal with AGW in the process.
>>>>
>>>> So it's a self-extinguishing problem that needs no shrieking
>>>
>>> No, because the later the transition, a) the rocker it will be and b)
>>> the worse climate change will get.
>>
>> It has to be bad before it can get worse. Climate change isn't
>> necessarily bad.
> 
> It sure is.
> 
>>>> Windmills and PV panels won't cut it
>>>
>>> http://www.go100re.net/
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> 100% Renewable Energy is a reality today
>>>
>>> Communities, regions, islands and countries across the world are
>>> celebrating their recent transition to 100% renewable energy (RE) in
>>> energy supply.
>>> ----------
>>>
>>> SPANKY-SPANKY!
>>>
>>> <snicker>
>>
>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!>
> 
> No. The empirical data has proved you wrong on that point. You don't get
> to religitage it.
> 
rerun

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685203

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-13 10:37 -0400
Message-ID<pd9ij8$94k$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#685196
On 5/13/2018 8:38 AM, % wrote:
> On 2018-05-12 7:56 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 22:41:01 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>
>> No. The empirical data has proved you wrong on that point. You don't get
>> to religitage it.
>
> rerun

I believe that's what Nadegda just said.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685214

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2018-05-13 12:17 -0400
Message-ID<p8pgfdpagrm1ucmm2f1apjejm718qthls1@4ax.com>
In reply to#685203
On Sun, 13 May 2018 10:37:28 -0400, kensi wrote:

>On 5/13/2018 8:38 AM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-05-12 7:56 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 22:41:01 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>>>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>>
>>> No. The empirical data has proved you wrong on that point. You don't get
>>> to religitage it.
>>
>> rerun
>
>I believe that's what Nadegda just said.

So your me-too was a re-rerun.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#685221

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-13 12:35 -0400
Message-ID<0PZJC.137702$br4.1344@fx34.iad>
In reply to#685203
On 5/13/2018 10:37 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/13/2018 8:38 AM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-05-12 7:56 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>> On Sat, 12 May 2018 22:41:01 -0400, Wally W. wrote:
>>>> Yo<SMACKAKOOK!>
>>>
>>> No. The empirical data has proved you wrong on that point. You don't get
>>> to religitage it.
>>
>> rerun
> 
> I believe that's what Nadegda just said.
> 
As you and Nads know, science it all about "belief" rather than 
measurements and facts. You win again!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 7 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web