Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #683663 > unrolled thread

Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers

Started byCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
First post2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
Last post2018-05-08 15:06 -0400
Articles 20 on this page of 123 — 12 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 23:06 +0000
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:56 -0400
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:58 +0000
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:29 -0400
      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:14 -0700
        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:13 -0400
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:10 -0400
          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:23 -0500
            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:30 -0400
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:31 -0500
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:13 +0000
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:02 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:04 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 12:36 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:25 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:52 -0500
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:19 +0000
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:28 -0700
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 17:21 -0500
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:17 -0700
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:04 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:31 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400
                                  Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700
                                    Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400
                                      Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700
                                        Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400
                                          Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700
                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000
                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500
                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700
                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700
                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700
                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600
                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500
                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600
                                                      Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500
                                                        Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500
                                                                Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000
                                                                  Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600
                                                                    Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000
                                                              Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600
                                                          Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500
                                                            Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000
                                          Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500
                                    Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500
                                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400
                                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400
                                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700
                                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
                            Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
                              Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
                                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
                                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
                                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
                                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
                                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
                  Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
                    Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
                      Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:32 -0700
                        Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0500
                          Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400

Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  Next page →


#684397

FromSkeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
Message-ID<bh04fddarmvincdf11163epkt01v2lpfmb@4ax.com>
In reply to#684396
On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
>out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof 
>that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
>you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
>cubic zirconia.


Better then the dust you been tossing out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684401

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
Message-ID<b8plot.c6m.17.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to#684397
On 2018-05-08 1:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself
>> out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof
>> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything
>> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be
>> cubic zirconia.
> 
> 
> Better then the dust you been tossing out.
> 
i just got an email that said ,
hi , still single ,
i freakin missed it again ,
there i was single and i didn't know ,
i could'a went out and tore it up if i knew ,
which is what i'd be doing if i was a single guy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684402

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
Message-ID<pct0bj$ci8$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684397
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:02:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>>myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>>no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>>everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>>inspection to be cubic zirconia.
>
> Bzzzzz!

SLAP
SLAP
<rolls up newspaper>
SWAT
SMACK!
<grabs can>
spritz
spritz
spritz

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684422

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
Message-ID<QJoIC.138367$DS3.106846@fx42.iad>
In reply to#684402
On 5/8/2018 4:12 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:02:08 -0600, Skeeter wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>>> myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>>> no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>>> everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>>> inspection to be cubic zirconia.
>>
>> Bzzzzz!
> 
> SLAP
> SLAP
> <rolls up newspaper>
> SWAT
> SMACK!
> <grabs can>
> spritz
> spritz
> spritz
> 
> <snicker>
> 
What an amazing fantasy life. I keep telling you Nads to lay off the 
stash for a while.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684415

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.355bb52352f7a22e993945@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#684397
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <bh04fddarmvincdf11163epkt01v2lpfmb@4ax.com>, 
fnvw@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
> >out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof 
> >that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
> >you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
> >cubic zirconia.
> 
> 
> Better then the dust you been tossing out.

A BIG FAT SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) on Nads!

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684417

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
Message-ID<b8pq4u.94o.19.4@news.alt.net>
In reply to#684415
On 2018-05-08 2:23 PM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <bh04fddarmvincdf11163epkt01v2lpfmb@4ax.com>,
> fnvw@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
>>
>> On Tue, 8 May 2018 19:58:51 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself
>>> out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof
>>> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything
>>> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be
>>> cubic zirconia.
>>
>>
>> Better then the dust you been tossing out.
> 
> A BIG FAT SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm) on Nads!
> 
a little skinny yanky yanky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684416

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
Message-ID<gAoIC.88568$R51.29408@fx03.iad>
In reply to#684396
On 5/8/2018 3:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>>
>>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>>
>>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>>
>>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>>>
>>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>>>
>> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither of
>> you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard taunt
>> you are going to post next.
>>
>> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I* didn't
>> post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl! And she
>> did!
>>
>> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
>> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
>> ---------------------
>> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
>> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
>>
>> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
>>
>> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
>>
>> <groveling ensues>
>>
>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
> skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
>>
>> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
> MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
> 2B16.13.33.png
>>
>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>> -----------
>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite
>> the figure in her SS uniform too!
> 
> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself
> out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still no proof
> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything
> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be
> cubic zirconia.

Every post I make if ample proof of all those things. Every post you 
make is proof of your dishonesty and ignorance. Nothing more is needed 
for any intelligent observer. (You are obviously hoping none of your 
readers are intelligent. Not that that is a bad assumption, I'd guess.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684441

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
Message-ID<pctb9v$ci8$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684416
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:24:27 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/8/2018 3:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>>>>
>>>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>>>>
>>> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither
>>> of you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard
>>> taunt you are going to post next.
>>>
>>> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I*
>>> didn't post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl!
>>> And she did!
>>>
>>> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
>>> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
>>> ---------------------
>>> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
>>> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
>>>
>>> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
>>>
>>> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
>>>
>>> <groveling ensues>
>>>
>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
>> skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
>>>
>>> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
>> MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
>> 2B16.13.33.png
>>>
>>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>>> -----------
>>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts
>>> quite the figure in her SS uniform too!
>> 
>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>> myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>> no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>> everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>> inspection to be cubic zirconia.
> 
> Every post I make if ample proof of all those things.

You and proof aren't even in the same Hubble volume, let alone zipcode.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684488

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
Message-ID<pVsIC.151232$RM2.14421@fx05.iad>
In reply to#684441
On 5/8/2018 7:19 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:24:27 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/8/2018 3:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>> melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your
>>>>>>>> own hand I published massive proof for you and "kanzi" to enjoy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then you won't have any trouble posting the MID of this post with
>>>>>>> this alleged "proof".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> MID goes here: ______________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <starts periodically glancing impatiently at watch>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you aren't reading my posts I"m certainly not going to spoon feed
>>>>>> you. I do not take orders from you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Translation: no MID. Just as expected.
>>>>>
>>>> "Kansi" you ignorant sock. So you are just a stoned as Nads? Neither
>>>> of you read anything anyone post, you only think of what schoolyard
>>>> taunt you are going to post next.
>>>>
>>>> If you had three brain cells to rub together you'd know that *I*
>>>> didn't post proof, I ordered NADS to do it for me as my slave girl!
>>>> And she did!
>>>>
>>>> We doan need no stinkin' MID!
>>>> Here's the ACTUAL POST, Cut and pasted just like you do!
>>>> ---------------------
>>>> Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any
>>>> proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.
>>>>
>>>> Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK
>>>>
>>>> Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:
>>>>
>>>> <groveling ensues>
>>>>
>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-
>>> skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/
>>>>
>>>> https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/
>>> MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%
>>> 2B16.13.33.png
>>>>
>>>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>>>> -----------
>>>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts
>>>> quite the figure in her SS uniform too!
>>>
>>> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent
>>> myself out for sex. Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". Still
>>> no proof that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far
>>> everything you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close
>>> inspection to be cubic zirconia.
>>
>> Every post I make if ample proof of all those things.
> 
> You and proof aren't even in the same Hubble volume, let alone zipcode.
> 
"she" asserts without a shred of proof. I guess we have to go on your 
'honest" reputation, right? You and "honest" big Jim Comey! Hey, how do 
you deal with that situation? Comey is out to "get" Trump and give you 
all revenge for Hillary's loss but at the same time the misogynist is 
responsible for putting Martha Stewart in stir for saying she was 
innocent of a crime she was never charged with nor convicted of. What a 
woman hater! Oh wait. Martha isn't a woman, right? She isn't a lesbian, 
she is a rich capitalist and deserves all your hate. Got it. Sort of 
like Bill's sexual harassment and assaults don't count because he's one 
of yours.  Me Too doesn't apply to fellow comrades.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684531

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
Message-ID<pcuku2$gbt$7@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684488
On 5/8/2018 10:20 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/8/2018 7:19 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 17:24:27 -0400, benj wrote:
>>> Every post I make if ample proof of all those things.
>>
>> You and proof aren't even in the same Hubble volume, let alone zipcode.
>
> "she" asserts without a shred of proof. I guess we have to go on your 
> 'honest" reputation, right? You and "honest" big Jim Comey! Hey, how do 
> you deal with that situation? Comey is out to "get" Trump and give you 
> all revenge for Hillary's loss but at the same time the misogynist is 
> responsible for putting Martha Stewart in stir for saying she was 
> innocent of a crime she was never charged with nor convicted of. What a 
> woman hater! Oh wait. Martha isn't a woman, right? She isn't a lesbian, 
> she is a rich capitalist and deserves all your hate. Got it. Sort of 
> like Bill's sexual harassment and assaults don't count because he's one 
> of yours.  Me Too doesn't apply to fellow comrades.

Scratch that, Nadegda. It seems that benj and *logic* aren't even in the 
same Hubble volume, to judge by that mass of semi-coherent screed.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684476

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
Message-ID<pctj7f$vop$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684396
On 5/8/2018 2:58 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:36:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/8/2018 12:40 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/8/2018 8:26 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:35 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:50:04 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>> Put down the doobie, stoner. While you off really looking at your

>> <raspberry> (Rule #5)
>> -----------
>> Climate crooks dressed as Nazis. There's your proof. Bet Nads cuts quite
>> the figure in her SS uniform too!
> 
> Nice smokescreen. But still no proof of your allegation that I rent myself 
> out for sex. 

no, no nads, why did you do that, for cash ? never do that, unless you
want to write a tell all book about Trump and make the big bucks.


> Still no proof that I "do all your bidding". 

which means you admit to doing most of his bidding.


> Still no proof 
> that you have any "gems of wisdom", for that matter -- so far everything 
> you've tried to pass off as such has proved on close inspection to be 
> cubic zirconia.
> 

so, no CZ, got it,  but you do accept gems and/or cash as payment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684156

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
Message-ID<yB1IC.63296$wG5.60495@fx02.iad>
In reply to#684118
On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>>> Schumer
>>>
>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as 
>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>
>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to 
>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, 
>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the 
>> snappy uniform in private.
> 
> PPOSTFU!
> 
>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science" warmballer
>> fraudsite.)
> 
> See above.
> 
Nads, the disgusting low whore who does all my bidding provides any 
proof needed for me for all my gems of wisdom.

Oh wait you want proof of the failed cartoonist. OK

Hey, Nads, you low worm, post the reference for me:

<groveling ensues>

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/07/23/yes-why-does-john-cook-of-skepticalscience-and-the-97-have-to-use-identity-theft-in-his-research/

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-lIlV30WM-RM/Vw88f2LrePI/AAAAAAAATvM/MIB6ssz6vEoVgL9kuUs-3PeJBzBNdAz_ACLcB/s1600/Screenshot%2B2015-06-28%2B16.13.33.png

<raspberry> (Rule #5)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684173

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
Message-ID<pcqa3f$rk6$12@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684156
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>> Schumer
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>
>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>>> snappy uniform in private.
>> 
>> PPOSTFU!
>> 
>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>> 
>> See above.
> 
> Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>

Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684177

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
Message-ID<pcqb1v$1scp$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684173
On 5/7/2018 2:40 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>>> Schumer
>>>>>
>>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>>
>>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>>>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>>>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>>>> snappy uniform in private.
>>>
>>> PPOSTFU!
>>>
>>>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>>>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>>>
>>> See above.
>>
>> Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
> 
> Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!
> 

so Nads the misandrist!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684210

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.355a5bd56a33d1e599392b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#684173
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pcqa3f$rk6$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
> > On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
> >> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
> >>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
> >>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
> >>>>> (pothead)
> >>>>> Schumer
> >>>>
> >>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
> >>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
> >>>
> >>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
> >>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
> >>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
> >>> snappy uniform in private.
> >> 
> >> PPOSTFU!
> >> 
> >>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
> >>> warmballer fraudsite.)
> >> 
> >> See above.
> > 
> > Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
> 
> Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!

Then there's the misandrists like you, K0okfArt.  I blame your kind for 
turning poor Gweggles gay.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684264

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Message-ID<pcqv11$k5f$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684210
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 13:49:58 -0700, Checkmate wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <pcqa3f$rk6$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
> @gmail.invalid says...
> 
> 
> 
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 15:15:41 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>> > On 5/7/2018 11:48 AM, kensi wrote:
>> >> On 5/7/2018 10:36 AM, benj wrote:
>> >>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>> >>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> >>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>> >>>>> (pothead)
>> >>>>> Schumer
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day
>> >>>> as guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>> >>>
>> >>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around
>> >>> to do the things she believes they should be doing for their own
>> >>> good, her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only
>> >>> wears the snappy uniform in private.
>> >> 
>> >> PPOSTFU!
>> >> 
>> >>> (Like the failed cartoonist who runs the "skeptical science"
>> >>> warmballer fraudsite.)
>> >> 
>> >> See above.
>> > 
>> > Nads, the disgusting low whore wh<MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
>> 
>> Fucking misogynists. They're everywhere!
> 
> Then there's the misandrists like you, K0okfArt.  I blame your kind for
> turning poor Gweggles gay.

Don't be ridiculous. Gerzzgl was gay long before I got here, and quite 
possibly before I was *born*.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684162

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
Message-ID<pcq9ab$rk6$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684103
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 10:36:08 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>> Schumer
>> 
>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>
> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, her
> Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the snappy
> uniform in private.

:O

LIES!

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684178

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
Message-ID<pcqbbj$1t8l$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#684162
On 5/7/2018 2:27 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 10:36:08 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>>> Schumer
>>>
>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>
>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, her
>> Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the snappy
>> uniform in private.
> 
> :O
> 
> LIES!
> 


Nazisploitation !

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684245

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
Message-ID<4r6IC.50873$bJ2.44549@fx15.iad>
In reply to#684162
On 5/7/2018 3:27 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Mon, 07 May 2018 10:36:08 -0400, benj wrote:
> 
>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck (pothead)
>>>> Schumer
>>>
>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>
>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good, her
>> Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the snappy
>> uniform in private.
> 
> :O
> 
> LIES!

In your language, Nads, what you call "lies" is what educated people 
call "truth" and what you call "truth" is what educated people term 
"fantasy".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#684263

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Message-ID<pcquvt$k5f$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#684245
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 07 May 2018 20:45:52 -0400, benj wrote:

> On 5/7/2018 3:27 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> melt!
>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 10:36:08 -0400, benj wrote:
>> 
>>> On 5/6/2018 11:30 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 5/6/2018 10:23 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>>>> Nazi's are  Democratic Socialist, like Nancy Pelosie + Chuck
>>>>> (pothead)
>>>>> Schumer
>>>>
>>>> Nonsense ... and nonsense from someone Nadegda outed the other day as
>>>> guess what? Oh, yeah, a Nazi, that was what.
>>>
>>> Outed? Puhleeze! As much as NAds loves ordering other people around to
>>> do the things she believes they should be doing for their own good,
>>> her Nazi views are obvious even though she probably only wears the
>>> snappy uniform in private.
>> 
>> :O
>> 
>> LIES!
> 
> In your language, Nads, what you call "lies" is what educated people
> call "truth" and what you call "truth" is what educated people term
> "fantasy".

Then you won't have any problems proving your claims.

Go ahead. I'll be tapping my foot though if you take too long.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 6 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web