Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #562667 > unrolled thread
| Started by | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-15 13:08 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-29 07:26 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 129 — 16 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 13:08 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-15 16:19 -0500
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-16 04:59 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 21:44 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 05:58 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-25 18:34 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-25 11:55 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 07:44 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 00:39 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-26 17:20 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 21:00 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 07:27 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 14:02 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 08:05 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 23:30 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-01 19:18 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 12:48 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 07:34 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 23:19 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 17:53 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-01 19:30 -0600
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-04 12:09 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-05 11:26 -0500
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:18 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 17:48 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-03 00:39 +0800
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-02 10:08 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-02 18:38 +0100
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 07:51 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 07:35 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 10:35 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 07:14 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-02 15:27 +0800
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-02 05:59 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-02 17:33 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-03 00:34 +0800
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-03 08:02 +0200
Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-03 07:11 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-04-03 00:23 -0700
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-04 03:40 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-04 07:06 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-04 08:59 +0200
Re: How to make faketard foam. Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-04 06:12 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-05 00:46 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-04 18:49 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-04 15:36 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 07:46 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-06 07:49 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 08:59 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-06 12:51 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:52 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 18:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 07:30 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-06 07:04 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-06 05:57 -0700
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-07 21:44 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 16:18 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-07 07:46 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 09:05 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-06 17:16 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-06 17:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-07 01:01 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-07 08:46 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-07 21:46 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 08:54 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-08 07:51 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-08 18:33 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-08 12:49 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:38 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-09 23:58 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-10 06:58 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-10 01:25 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-10 17:57 +0200
Re: Faketards answer to everything he has to run away from. Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-10 10:18 -0600
Re: Faketards answer to everything he has to run away from. Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-11 09:42 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 08:00 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-10 15:09 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-12 07:48 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-12 07:40 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-12 09:04 +0100
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-04-12 18:18 +0800
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-13 06:58 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-13 01:20 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-13 13:24 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-13 20:50 +0100
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-13 15:51 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-13 21:45 -0700
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-13 13:23 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-13 06:58 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-13 01:20 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-13 13:23 -0600
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-16 07:38 +0200
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-16 14:48 +0000
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-17 07:35 +0200
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-17 01:50 -0400
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-17 18:08 +0000
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-18 07:29 +0200
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-04-18 06:24 +0000
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-17 23:28 -0700
Re: Walking through a problem that uses a derivative Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-19 08:28 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-16 07:58 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Rick Sabian's Allstar Canadian Assworm Zydeco Band <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-04-16 00:01 -0700
Re: fakeys meltdown Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-16 02:27 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-16 11:22 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-17 06:56 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-17 01:20 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-18 07:19 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2016-04-16 23:06 -0700
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-16 08:15 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-17 07:40 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-17 01:53 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-18 07:04 +0200
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-17 23:56 -0600
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Jed Clampett <jc@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-16 11:58 -0700
Re: Our very own "chinese room" snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-04-06 19:37 +0100
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-06 20:54 +0000
Re: Our very own "chinese room" "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-06 17:45 -0400
Re: Our very own "chinese room" Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-07 21:46 -0600
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-04-02 12:41 -0600
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-04-02 12:02 -0400
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-03-25 13:07 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 11:05 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-09 07:16 +0200
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-23 18:21 -0700
case of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 13:24 -0700
Re: case of that James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-04-28 10:19 -0700
Re: Nutcase Dude Gets Schooled on Tornadogenesis Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-04-29 07:26 +0200
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 17:16 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <08j9gbltie8jdlm3f9du4gu5mudf1eos5o@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568203 |
Fakey wrote:
> vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump
> > What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe?
>
> You obviously do no stock trading,
Sorry fakey, we are talking about mathematical
derivatives, not stock options.
Oh, wait... you don't understand either one.
<google-scour, then insert misdirection here: __________>
> or you'd realize that the first
> derivative of price/time is the slope of the price, the second order
> derivative is the rate of price change,
Wrong again, fakey...
Those are both the same thing.
d(price)/dt = slope of price as a function of time
= rate of change of price with time
= first derivative of price(t).
> and the third order derivative
> is the rate of change of that rate of change.
No, that's the 2nd derivative, d^2(price)/dt.
Wrong again, fakey... ho hum.
Don't you ever get tired of being spanked about things
you google that you can't understand?
Why don't you go back to google, find something you can
understand, work your way up, and come back and ask if
you got it yet.
<snip much petulant wailing & gnashing of teeth>
> > I've already told you what you get from a derivative -- now go figure out
> > what you get from an integral.
>
> Really? You think you're so smart, huh? The anti-derivative with
LOL! "anti-derivative"... snjork!
> respect to x finds the area to the x axis from the curve, using the
> Riemann Summation formula.
Normal people use integrals, fakey. Not infinite-series
recursive approximations. But... i guess you're stuck
with the things you can comprehend, and when you're just
a lowly faketard, that doesn't leave you with very much.
> Now, what's the fourth order derivative? Or would you rather expound
> upon snap, crackle and pop?
Uh, fakey... just learn what simple derivatives are
before you go off on a tangent (heheh) about things you
can't ever understand.
--
"...the RMS voltage of an AC peak voltage
waveform is still a sinusoidal waveform."
--Fakey explains "RMS waveforms"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-06 17:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <0cedda9b8bbf311cae0b3fd9484a7df8@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568224 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:08j9gbltie8jdlm3f9du4gu5mudf1eos5o@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump >>> What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe? >> You obviously do no stock trading, > Sorry fakey, we are talking about mathematical > derivatives, not stock options. Bwahaa<choke, gasp>ahahahaaa! "stock options" Ahahaaaahahaaa! Have you figured out yet that stock trading requires mathematical derivatives, Mathematical Moron? LOL Have you figured out yet that mathematical derivatives as used in stock trading are not stock options, Mathematical Moron? LOL > Oh, wait... you don't understand either one. > > <google-scour, then insert misdirection here: __________> Bwahahahaa! Oh, fuck, are you ever retarded, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. Now I *know* _you've_ never done any stock trading... if you had, you'd realize that you can program your own stock indicators, calculating first, second and third order derivatives of price, volume, bid, ask and option volume. <http://marketthoughtsandanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/first-and-second-derivatives-of-spx.html> SPNAK! This *entire* *fucking* *post* is going into the SPNAK!-pile, Mathematical Moron. You're *that* SPNAK!d. <snicker> >> or you'd realize that the first derivative of price/time is the >> slope of the price, the second order derivative is the rate of >> price change, > Wrong again, fakey... Translation: "I'm wrong again, fakey..." LOL > Those are both the same thing. > d(price)/dt = slope of price as a function of time > = rate of change of price with time > = first derivative of price(t). Bwahahahaa! Have you figured out yet that velocity does not equal acceleration or deceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL Have you figured out yet that the derivative of a constant is always equal to zero, Mathematical Moron? LOL Mathematical Moron says that velocity equals acceleration or deceleration! Ho Lee Phuck, you're a mathematical moron. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative> "the derivative of the position of a moving object with respect to time is the object's velocity" <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_derivative> "the second derivative of the position of a vehicle with respect to time is the instantaneous acceleration of the vehicle, or the rate at which the velocity of the vehicle is changing with respect to time." SPNAK! >> and the third order derivative is the rate of change of that >> rate of change. > No, that's the 2nd derivative, d^2(price)/dt. > Wrong again, fakey... ho hum. Do you *ever* get tired of proving yourself a moron? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)> "jerk, also known as jolt, surge, or lurch, is the rate of change of acceleration; that is, the derivative of acceleration with respect to time, and as such the second derivative of velocity, or the third derivative of position." If you're rolling along in your clown car at 1000 RPM on the engine and 45 MPH road speed on a level road, and you press the gas pedal such that you're now accelerating by 45 MPH per minute, then after 30 seconds you hit a downgrade which progressively increases this acceleration such you'll hit 135 MPH in 1 minute, what was the third order derivative, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? It also becomes blatantly obvious that you've never worked with any burner control or chiller control systems, as they use first, second and third order derivative of temperature to control firing rate or chiller load smoothly with minimum overshoot. Moron. SPNAK! > Don't you ever get tired of being spanked about things > you google that you can't understand? Spankard. LOL > Why don't you go back to google, find something you can > understand, work your way up, and come back and ask if > you got it yet. Says the moron who didn't rape Google hard enough. LOL > <snip much petulant wailing & gnashing of teeth> Translation: "Snip of everything that kicks my ass. My next post to you will snip *everything*. I'm a spankard. And a mathematical moron. I wish I could be right just once." >>> I've already told you what you get from a derivative -- now go figure out >>> what you get from an integral. >> Really? You think you're so smart, huh? The anti-derivative with > LOL! "anti-derivative"... snjork! Bwahahahaaa! Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative is the same as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL And there's the proof that Mathematical Moron didn't rape Google hard enough... <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiderivative> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative> "The fundamental theorem of calculus states that antidifferentiation is the same as integration." Have you figured out yet what the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is, Mathematical Moron? LOL SPNAK! >> respect to x finds the area to the x axis from the curve, using the >> Riemann Summation formula. > Normal people use integrals, fakey. Not infinite-series > recursive approximations. But... i guess you're stuck > with the things you can comprehend, and when you're just > a lowly faketard, that doesn't leave you with very much. Bwahahahaa! Tell us again how finding the anti-derivative is not the same as finding the integral, Maffemagickal Moron. >> Now, what's the fourth order derivative? Or would you rather expound >> upon snap, crackle and pop? > Uh, fakey... Translation: "Uh, fakey... we're not talking about talking cereal. DUUURRRHHH!" LOL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jounce> "snap is the fourth derivative of the position vector with respect to time, with the first, second, and third derivatives being velocity, acceleration, and jerk, respectively; hence, the jounce is the rate of change of the jerk with respect to time." SPNAK! > just learn what simple derivatives are > before you go off on a tangent (heheh) about things you > can't ever understand. Moron. Spankard. LOL -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. That finding the anti-derivative is the same as finding the integral. That stock trading requires mathematical derivatives. That mathematical derivatives as used in stock trading are not stock options. That velocity does not equal acceleration or deceleration. What the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 01:01 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <hpeagb1g21fqofcsnkv5mcab9fmttdt9nm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568290 |
Fakey wrote: > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > > > Fakey wrote: > > >> vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump > > >>> What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe? > > >> You obviously do no stock trading, > > > Sorry fakey, we are talking about mathematical > > derivatives, not stock options. > > Bwahaa<choke, gasp>ahahahaaa! "stock options" Ahahaaaahahaaa! Sorry if the topic is too hard. You really do suck at jargon-parroting, fakester. > Have you figured out yet that stock trading requires mathematical > derivatives, Mathematical Moron? LOL No, it actually doesn't... but you wouldn't know that. > > Oh, wait... you don't understand either one. > > > > <google-scour, then insert misdirection here: __________> And look, fakey follows orders, and generates frantic misdirection, like a good little spanktard: > Bwahahahaa! Oh, fuck, are you ever retarded, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. > > Now I *know* _you've_ never done any stock trading... if you had, > you'd realize that you can program your own stock indicators, > calculating first, second and third order derivatives of price, > volume, bid, ask and option volume. <snip further evasion> > >> or you'd realize that the first derivative of price/time is the > >> slope of the price, the second order derivative is the rate of > >> price change, > > > Wrong again, fakey... > > > Those are both the same thing. > > d(price)/dt = slope of price as a function of time > > = rate of change of price with time > > = first derivative of price(t). > > Bwahahahaa! Have you figured out yet that velocity does not equal > acceleration or deceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL Your desperate swerving is taken as admission that you don't understand any of this, even after hours of google-scouring. If you would listen instead of froth, you could learn a lot. But you can't, and you won't. > >> and the third order derivative is the rate of change of that > >> rate of change. > > > No, that's the 2nd derivative, d^2(price)/dt. > > Wrong again, fakey... ho hum. > > Do you *ever* get tired of proving yourself a moron? There you go, fakey. Inability to learn. > >> Really? You think you're so smart, huh? The anti-derivative with > > > LOL! "anti-derivative"... snjork! > > Bwahahahaaa! Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative > is the same as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL Have you figured out that anti-addition is the same as subtraction? I'm sure you could impress the babes with words like that, faketard. Have you figured out yet that your Schwinn is the same thing as an anti-Lotus? Have you figured out that arguing with your betters is the same as stupidity? No, you will never get that one. > >> Now, what's the fourth order derivative? Or would you rather expound > >> upon snap, crackle and pop? > > > Uh, fakey... just learn what simple derivatives are > > before you go off on a tangent (heheh) about things you > > can't ever understand. > > Moron. Spankard. LOL What's the effective temperature of the 700 nm red-body radiation emitted from your cherry-red, glow-in-the-daylight, re-spanked ass? -- "3-phase AC power constitutes a closed loop!" --Fakey demonstrates his mastery of Kirchoff's Law
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 08:46 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <f46ae541eafbfc35921ca00c743bdd18@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568321 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:hpeagb1g21fqofcsnkv5mcab9fmttdt9nm@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in >>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>> vallor, in <news:dmfr9bFqrvfU2@mid.individual.net> did thusly jump >>>>> What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe? >>>> You obviously do no stock trading, >>> Sorry fakey, we are talking about mathematical >>> derivatives, not stock options. >> Bwahaa<choke, gasp>ahahahaaa! "stock options" Ahahaaaahahaaa! > Sorry if the topic is too hard. You really do suck at > jargon-parroting, fakester. You really do suck at backpedaling, Spankard. LOL >> Have you figured out yet that stock trading requires mathematical >> derivatives, Mathematical Moron? LOL > No, it actually doesn't... but you wouldn't know that. Yeah, it does. You cowardly snipped out the link I posted proving it, so I'll post another for you to run away from, just so everyone can get a really good look at what a backpedaling coward you are. <https://www.tradestation.com/~/media/Files/TradeStation/Education/University/School%20of%20EasyLanguage/Books/EL_FunctionsAndReservedWords_Ref.ashx> That's EasyLanguage, a programming DSL for stocks, futures, commodities and options. Now... strap on your little tardly thinking cap, Spankard, and pay attention... what mathematical derivative is being used when one is using the simplest technical indicator one could possibly use, and why? Go on, Stok Geeneyus, edumacate us. LOL >> Have you figured out yet that mathematical derivatives as used in >> stock trading are not stock options, Mathematical Moron? LOL <crickets> LOL! >>> Oh, wait... you don't understand either one. >>> >>> <google-scour, then insert misdirection here: __________> > And look, fakey follows orders, and drop-kicks a moronic Maffemagickal Mooron. LOL > generates frantic misdirection, like a good little spanktard: Look at the spankard backpedaling! Bwahahaaa! And now he's so butthurt he's cowardly snipping again! Baahahahaaa! Your cowardice has been fixored, Spankard. >> Bwahahahaa! Oh, fuck, are you ever retarded, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. >> >> Now I *know* _you've_ never done any stock trading... if you had, >> you'd realize that you can program your own stock indicators, >> calculating first, second and third order derivatives of price, >> volume, bid, ask and option volume. >> >> <http://marketthoughtsandanalysis.blogspot.com/2009/11/first-and-second-derivatives-of-spx.html> >> >> SPNAK! >> >> This *entire* *fucking* *post* is going into the SPNAK!-pile, >> Mathematical Moron. You're *that* SPNAK!d. >> >> <snicker> > <snip further evasion> And he even proudly admits his cowardice! *That*, folks, is how one trains a kook. LOL >>>> or you'd realize that the first derivative of price/time is the >>>> slope of the price, the second order derivative is the rate of >>>> price change, >>> Wrong again, fakey... Cowardly snipping *again*! Bwahahaha! Restored, Spankard: >> Translation: >> "I'm wrong again, fakey." LOL >>> Those are both the same thing. >>> d(price)/dt = slope of price as a function of time >>> = rate of change of price with time >>> = first derivative of price(t). >> Bwahahahaa! Have you figured out yet that velocity does not equal >> acceleration or deceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL > Your desperate swerving is taken as admission that you > don't understand any of this, even after hours of > google-scouring. Your desperate cowardly snipping of the websites which prove you're *wrong*, because you're too fucking cowardly to ever admit it and get laughed at, is noted. How's *that* tactic working for ya, Spankard? LOL! > If you would listen instead of froth, you could learn a > lot. But you can't, and you won't. Learn a lot from you? The Maffimagickal Mooron? That'd be like learning a lot from that delusional reality-denying TornadoTard. LOL Cowardly snipping *again*! Bahahahaaaaaa! You pathetic backpedaling moronic sack of stupid shit. And the really funny part is, you're *so* fucking deluded that you actually believe you're 'winning' as I drop-kicked your moronic ass across Usenet, as evidence by your pathetic delusional 'victolly' bleats... right before you cowardly snip and run away. Again. LOL! >> Have you figured out yet that the derivative of a constant is always >> equal to zero, Mathematical Moron? LOL >> >> Mathematical Moron says that velocity equals acceleration or >> deceleration! Ho Lee Phuck, you're a mathematical moron. >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative> >> "the derivative of the position of a moving object with respect to >> time is the object's velocity" >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_derivative> >> "the second derivative of the position of a vehicle with respect to >> time is the instantaneous acceleration of the vehicle, or the rate at >> which the velocity of the vehicle is changing with respect to time." >> >> SPNAK! If you would shut your blabbering gob instead of spewing diversions and bleating in pain as you ran away, you could learn a lot. But you can't, and you won't. You're a Maffemagickal Moooron. LOL >>>> and the third order derivative is the rate of change of that >>>> rate of change. >>> No, that's the 2nd derivative, d^2(price)/dt. >>> Wrong again, fakey... ho hum. >> Do you *ever* get tired of proving yourself a moron? Bwahahahaaaa! Spankard snips out everything proving him wrong, bleats out a meek 'victolly!', and runs away. Again. Restored: >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerk_(physics)> >> "jerk, also known as jolt, surge, or lurch, is the rate of change of >> acceleration; that is, the derivative of acceleration with respect to >> time, and as such the second derivative of velocity, or the third >> derivative of position." >> >> If you're rolling along in your clown car at 1000 RPM on the engine >> and 45 MPH road speed on a level road, and you press the gas pedal >> such that you're now accelerating by 45 MPH per minute, then after 30 >> seconds you hit a downgrade which progressively increases this >> acceleration such you'll hit 135 MPH in 1 minute, what was the third >> order derivative, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? >> >> It also becomes blatantly obvious that you've never worked with any >> burner control or chiller control systems, as they use first, second >> and third order derivative of temperature to control firing rate or >> chiller load smoothly with minimum overshoot. Moron. >> >> SPNAK! > There you go, fakey. Inability to learn. You're projecting, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. Have you figured out yet what the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is, Mathematical Moron? LOL Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and cofunctionality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative is the same as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL >>>> Really? You think you're so smart, huh? The anti-derivative with >>> LOL! "anti-derivative"... snjork! >> Bwahahahaaa! Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative >> is the same as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL And now that the spankard is backed into a corner (again) and getting his tardly snaggle-teeth kicked in (again), he starts babbling out his retardation (again)! It just keeps getting better and better! This kind of simultaneous meltdown / cowardly backpedal / ink cloud retreat is seldom seen except amongst the biggest kooktards. LOL > Have you figured out that anti-addition is the same as > subtraction? I'm sure you could impress the babes with > words like that, faketard. Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and cofunctionality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > Have you figured out yet that your Schwinn is the same > thing as an anti-Lotus? Have you figured out yet what the "co" in "cosine" means, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > Have you figured out that arguing with your betters is > the same as stupidity? No, you will never get that one. Have you figured out yet that you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron? LOL Your cowardice has been fixored, Spankard: >> And there's the proof that Mathematical Moron didn't rape Google hard >> enough... >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiderivative> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative> >> "The fundamental theorem of calculus states that antidifferentiation >> is the same as integration." >> >> Have you figured out yet what the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is, >> Mathematical Moron? LOL >> >> SPNAK! >>>> Now, what's the fourth order derivative? Or would you rather expound >>>> upon snap, crackle and pop? >>> Uh, fakey... And the spankard cowardly snips *again*! The magnitude of your butthurt must have you howling and spittle-flecking at your screen... you read my post, your throat clenched, your heart pounded, you hammered your stubby-fingered tard-fists on your computer desk, then you ran away. Again. LOL >> Translation: >> "Uh, fakey... we're not talking about talking cereal. DUUURRRHHH!" LOL >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jounce> >> "snap is the fourth derivative of the position vector with respect to >> time, with the first, second, and third derivatives being velocity, >> acceleration, and jerk, respectively; hence, the jounce is the rate of >> change of the jerk with respect to time." >> >> SPNAK! >>> just learn what simple derivatives are >>> before you go off on a tangent (heheh) about things you >>> can't ever understand. >> Moron. Spankard. LOL > What's the effective temperature of the 700 nm red-body > radiation emitted from your cherry-red, > glow-in-the-daylight, re-spanked ass? You be sure to let us all know when you start your feeble "spanking", Spankard, after you've picked up your teeth and salved your bootfucked ass. Again. LOL > -- > "3-phase AC power constitutes a closed loop!" > --Fakey demonstrates his mastery of Kirchoff's Law I'd suggest you at least learn to spell the name correctly before you attempt to misquote me, but you're a moron, you're incapable of learning. LOL! <http://people.sinclair.edu/nickreeder/eet1155/mod02.htm> "Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) says that the sum of the voltage drops around any closed loop in a circuit equals the sum of the voltage rises around that loop." <http://www.tina.com/course/31three/three> "The delta or D-connection of three phases is achieved by connecting the three loads in series forming a closed loop." Does... does that say three phases connected in series forms a closed loop... gee, that's how a delta transformer or 3-phase motor works, isn't it? <http://www.tpub.com/neets/book5/17c.htm> "The primary windings, for example, are connected to each other to form a closed loop." Does... does that say three phases form a closed loop... gee, that's how an alternator works, isn't it? <http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/three-phase-y-delta-configurations/> "One quick check of this is to use Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law to see if the three voltages around the loop add up to zero." Does... does that prove you *wrong* on two fronts... that Kirchhoff's Voltage Law *is* used for 3-phase AC, *and* that 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop across all three phases? Yeah... yeah it does. SPNAK! on the know-nothing moron. I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron. <snicker> I'ma just drop another SPNAK! in there because you've been SPNAK!d *so* hard the SPNAK! is still reverberating, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard. LOL ______ _______ __ __ ______ __ __ __ / \ / \ / \ / | / \ / | / |/ | /PS!KAN |SPNAK!S |SP \ NA |/SPNAK! |SP | /PN/ AK!| AN \__PS/ !S |__SN |!NS \pS |!S |__NA |PS |/!S/ SP | !K \ K! AK/ KAPN K! |KP SP |N! AK< NA | SPNAK! |AKANPS!/ AK AK AN |ANSPNAK! |AKSPN \ !!/ / \__SP |N! | N! |!SSP |NA | !K |KA |NP \ __ !K NA/ PS | PS | P!K |PK | AN |!N | AS |/ | ANPS!K/ SP/ SP/ NA/ S!/ SP/ SP/ K!/ !!/ <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-07 21:46 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <ecaegb1mp0e6mtbm8ik1nqjnb1dhemqbne@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568498 |
On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:46:39 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >Yeah, it does. You cowardly snipped out the link I posted proving it, >so I'll post another for you to run away from, just so everyone can >get a really good look at what a backpedaling coward you are. Everbody is laffing at joo poser boi.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 08:54 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <352d55bf3242186b347d606392c1348d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568498 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:k49dgb1dqskur3ek0n2k3ukrl295q5svs2@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in >>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>>>>> What's a derivative _FOR_, FNVHe? >>>>>> You obviously do no stock trading, >>>>> Sorry fakey, we are talking about mathematical >>>>> derivatives, not stock options. >>>> Bwahaa<choke, gasp>ahahahaaa! "stock options" Ahahaaaahahaaa! > You don't get that stock options are "derivatives" in a > different meaning of the word. It went over your head. > Like i said, you don't understand either one. Bwahahahaaa! Look at the moron backpedal. No one has mentioned stock options except for you, you moron. I specifically said "stock trading". And even using a simple moving average means you're using a mathematical derivative... can you figure out which one, Mathematical Moron? LOL >>>> Have you figured out yet that stock trading requires mathematical >>>> derivatives, Mathematical Moron? LOL >>> No, it actually doesn't... but you wouldn't know that. >> Yeah, it does. You cowardly snipped out the link I posted proving it, >> so I'll post another for you to run away from, just so everyone can > No, fakey, you didn't prove anything. You claimed stock > trading REQUIRES (your word) mathematical derivatives. It does, you moron. Well, maybe in your case, it wouldn't, because you're too fucking stupid to gauge the market for entry points. LOL What does one watch for in price and volume to determine an appropriate entry point for bids, Spankard? What does one watch for in price and volume to determine an appropriate exit point for asks, Spankard? Moron. LOL > Your link cites no such rule or law, because there isn't > one. Sheesh, you're a blockhead. > > Stop making shit up, like stock trading rules and > imaginary Lotii. Bwahahaaaaa! Holy shit, Spankard, you're dumber than Gulley. >> Look at the spankard backpedaling! Bwahahaaa! >> >> And now he's so butthurt he's cowardly snipping again! Baahahahaaa! > Sorry, fakey, you have said nothing worthy of > consideration. Try again. You pathetic backpedaling cowardly snipping piece of shit. You're so spanked you can't even stop yourself from cowardly snipping and lying. LOL >>> If you would listen instead of froth, you could learn a >>> lot. But you can't, and you won't. >> Learn a lot from you? The Maffimagickal Mooron? That'd be like >> learning a lot from that delusional reality-denying TornadoTard. LOL > You can remain ignorant, if you really insist. You do, and you have. LOL > You can paste-n-screed irrelevant things you googled, if > you really insist. Doesn't mean anyone has to care. Awww, the "no one cares" backpedal of a spankard. LOL > You can even pretend you have a lotus, and yell "Vrooom > vroooom!!!" while you run around in circles. And now fanfic. LOL! >> Cowardly snipping *again*! Bahahahaaaaaa! You pathetic > Is there a reason i need to include your blither-blather > in MY post? You mean beside the fact that it proves you're a moron, and the fact that your cowardly snipping it out proves you're a cowardly backpedaling moron? LOL > I know it's golden to you, but really, > fakey, it's all jabberwocky. You can't answer what i said > except for crying & screaming... no comment required. You mean your blither-blathering about options trading when everyone else was talking about stock trading? Or your desperate attempts at diverting attention away from the fact that you've yet again proven yourself to be a moron? LOL >> moronic sack of stupid shit. And the really funny part is, you're *so* >> fucking deluded that you actually believe you're 'winning' as I > Heheh... fakey, i'm not winning. I won. Bleat and > blather, cry and whine. Get in your imaginary lotus and > cry "Vrooooom vroooooom!" Translation: "<fanfic> <victolly!" LOL! > I have already demonstrated that you have no clue about > that of which you babble. Says the moron blathering on about options trading that he knows nothing about and mathematical derivatives that he knows nothing about, then cowardly snipping out the proof that he's a moron and bleating "victolly!". LOL >>> What's the effective temperature of the 700 nm red-body >>> radiation emitted from your cherry-red, >>> glow-in-the-daylight, re-spanked ass? > Still can't answer? I thought you proved to Kensi that > you were the expert in red-body radiation. Ah, how the > mighty have fallen. Mighty sad, that is. You still haven't answered what your delusional "red-body radiation" is, Spankard. Keep blathering on about your delusional victolly! as though it'd actually taken place, Spankard... it's ever so much fun drop-kicking your moronic ass across Usenet, and it makes it so much easier knowing that you're ineducable. LOL >> Does... does that prove you *wrong* on two fronts... that Kirchhoff's >> Voltage Law *is* used for 3-phase AC, *and* that 3-phase AC >> constitutes a closed loop across all three phases? Yeah... yeah it >> does. > Does... does it make your case to argue with yourself > over something i never said, that you can't understand, > and lose the argument? LOL & Rolf. Does... does it assuage your eternal butthurt to backpedal away from all the SPNAK!age you've been taking, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 07:51 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <1qdfgb1pns9fs18m25jjebsn1svc8ujglb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #568836 |
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:54:33 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > >You mean your blither-blathering about options trading when everyone >else was talking about stock trading? <TINEE>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 18:33 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <061e4b776b5eca7ec3e6d53150286ef5@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568836 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:jpoegb5qbbja0pl98tkoon35shssafordq@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>> And now he's so butthurt he's cowardly snipping again! Baahahahaaa! >>> Sorry, fakey, you have said nothing worthy of >>> consideration. Try again. >> You pathetic backpedaling cowardly snipping piece of shit. You're so >> spanked you can't even stop yourself from cowardly snipping and lying. >> LOL > Try Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> > again, Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and cofunctionality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > Ersatzia. Have you figured out yet that the derivative of a constant is always equal to zero, Mathematical Moron? LOL > More Have you figured out yet what the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is, Mathematical Moron? LOL > tears Have you figured out yet that velocity does not equal acceleration or deceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL > this Have you figured out yet that mathematical derivatives as used in stock trading are not stock options, Mathematical Moron? LOL > time. Have you figured out yet that stock trading requires mathematical derivatives, Mathematical Moron? LOL > W Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative is the same as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL > h Have you figured out yet that you're a mathematical moron, Mathematical Moron? LOL > o Have you figured out yet what the "co" in "cosine" means, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > o Have you figured out yet that water *does* have a plasma temperature, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > o Have you figured out yet that *any* substance can be plasmized given sufficient energy input, *including* water, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL > o Have you figured out yet that image size != image resolution, Mathematical Moron? LOL > s Have you figured out yet that Euler's sinewave summation equation is a result of superposition and the *additivity* rule of vector *summation*, Mathematical Moron? LOL > h! Have you figured out yet that cos(x) leads sin(x) by 90 degrees, Mathematical Moron? LOL RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD!!! RRRRRUUUUUUUNNNNNNN!!!! <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 12:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <op.yfl0z702tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #568977 |
On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:33:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> <news:jpoegb5qbbja0pl98tkoon35shssafordq@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
>
>>>>> And now he's so butthurt he's cowardly snipping again! Baahahahaaa!
>
>>>> Sorry, fakey, you have said nothing worthy of
>>>> consideration. Try again.
>
>>> You pathetic backpedaling cowardly snipping piece of shit. You're so
>>> spanked you can't even stop yourself from cowardly snipping and lying.
>>> LOL
>
>> Try
>
> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is
> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL
> <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png>
then why doesn't -cos(x) == acos(x)?
also:
-sin(x) != asin(x)
>
>> again,
>
> Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and
> cofunctionality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>
>> Ersatzia.
>
> Have you figured out yet that the derivative of a constant is always
> equal to zero, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> More
>
> Have you figured out yet what the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is,
> Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> tears
>
> Have you figured out yet that velocity does not equal acceleration or
> deceleration, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> this
>
> Have you figured out yet that mathematical derivatives as used in
> stock trading are not stock options, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> time.
>
> Have you figured out yet that stock trading requires mathematical
> derivatives, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> W
>
> Have you figured out yet that finding the anti-derivative is the same
> as finding the integral, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> h
>
> Have you figured out yet that you're a mathematical moron,
> Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> o
>
> Have you figured out yet what the "co" in "cosine" means, Shiny
> Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>
>> o
>
> Have you figured out yet that water *does* have a plasma temperature,
> Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>
>> o
>
> Have you figured out yet that *any* substance can be plasmized given
> sufficient energy input, *including* water, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard?
> LOL
>
>> o
>
> Have you figured out yet that image size != image resolution,
> Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> s
>
> Have you figured out yet that Euler's sinewave summation equation is a
> result of superposition and the *additivity* rule of vector
> *summation*, Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
>> h!
>
> Have you figured out yet that cos(x) leads sin(x) by 90 degrees,
> Mathematical Moron? LOL
>
> RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD!!! RRRRRUUUUUUUNNNNNNN!!!!
>
> <snicker>
>
--
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...
-
"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the
stock market go even lower."
so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?
funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the
government stepping in to save the stock market.
Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view
and several heterodox points of view.
"First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.
Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow
to owe ever more in real terms."
wait? what? no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the
government for everything mentioned?
odd, that. eh, lotusLoser?
-
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 08:38 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <725cee8ff4eb45b2412efe91aa60e006@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568979 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yfl0z702tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:33:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is >> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL >> <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> > then why doesn't -cos(x) == acos(x)? > > also: > > -sin(x) != asin(x) For the same reason you can't grasp why your kooky sinewave subtraction equation produces sinusoids 180 degrees phase from where they're supposed to be. For the same reason you have to use negative phase angles in your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to even get it to work. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL <http://i.imgur.com/4KfnZdN.png> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Cracky McCrackhead. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL <snicker> -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 23:58 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <op.yfoqnqfktm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #569166 |
On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:38:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yfl0z702tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:33:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is
>>> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png>
>
>> then why doesn't -cos(x) == acos(x)?
>>
>> also:
>>
>> -sin(x) != asin(x)
>
> For the same reason you can't grasp why your kooky sinewave
is that the same reason that you can't even manage to produce a "euler
sinewave solution" to your 6 sinewave sum?
> subtraction equation produces sinusoids 180 degrees phase from where
> they're supposed to be.
http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png
explain to me the problem you have with that image.
> For the same reason you have to use negative
> phase angles in your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to even get
> it to work. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
> Mega-Moron. LOL
LOL
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/4KfnZdN.png>
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Cracky McCrackhead. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
> <snicker>
>
--
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...
-
"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the
stock market go even lower."
so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?
funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the
government stepping in to save the stock market.
"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view
and several heterodox points of view.
First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.
Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow
to owe ever more in real terms."
wait? what? no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the
government for everything mentioned?
odd, that. eh, lotusLoser?
-
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 06:58 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <edc411aae9b0924a322eb40132fed06d@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #569355 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yfoqnqfktm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:38:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yfl0z702tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:33:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is >>>> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL >>>> <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> >>> then why doesn't -cos(x) == acos(x)? >>> >>> also: >>> >>> -sin(x) != asin(x) >> For the same reason you can't grasp why your kooky sinewave > is that the same reason that you can't even manage to produce a "euler > sinewave solution" to your 6 sinewave sum? After your embarrassing yourself so badly over that, I felt that you didn't need any further embarrassment. LOL >> subtraction equation produces sinusoids 180 degrees phase from where >> they're supposed to be. > http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png > > explain to me the problem you have with that image. Negative phase angles. LOL! You can't even get your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to get the proper phase shift without using them, and switching the phases in your moronic equation changes the phase of the sinusoid. The Euler sinewave summation equation fixes all that. Too bad you're far too stoooopid to figure it out, though... and even if you were, you wouldn't, because that'd mean you'd have to admit that I (and every scientist and researcher using the Euler sinewave summation equation since 1748) were right, and you're Robert Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh, PA, the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL >> For the same reason you have to use negative >> phase angles in your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to even get >> it to work. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical >> Mega-Moron. LOL > LOL >> <http://i.imgur.com/4KfnZdN.png> Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Cracky McCrackhead. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL <snicker> -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 01:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <op.yfouovw1tm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #569375 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 00:58:50 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
> <news:op.yfoqnqfktm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
> into the wood chipper again:
>
>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:38:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka
>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey),
>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in
>>> <news:op.yfl0z702tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first
>>> into the wood chipper again:
>
>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:33:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood
>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
>
>>>>> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is
>>>>> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL
>>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png>
>
>>>> then why doesn't -cos(x) == acos(x)?
>>>>
>>>> also:
>>>>
>>>> -sin(x) != asin(x)
>
>>> For the same reason you can't grasp why your kooky sinewave
>
>> is that the same reason that you can't even manage to produce a "euler
>> sinewave solution" to your 6 sinewave sum?
>
> After your embarrassing yourself so badly over that, I felt that you
> didn't need any further embarrassment. LOL
when does that occur lotusLiar?
>
>>> subtraction equation produces sinusoids 180 degrees phase from where
>>> they're supposed to be.
>
>> http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png
>>
>> explain to me the problem you have with that image.
>
> Negative phase angles. LOL!
so *prove* it wrong?
can you manage? no? that's what i thought.
to model 3-phase you can define phase angles mathematically however you
desire as long as they are 120deg apart, dumbass. is that what threw you
for a loop?
are you mad that i just so happened to choose the standard definitions of
3 phase that most engineers use this time around?
phase A - 0 deg
phase B - -120 deg
phase C - +120 deg
?
>
> You can't even get your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to get the
> proper phase shift without using them, and switching the phases in
> your moronic equation changes the phase of the sinusoid. The Euler
> sinewave summation equation fixes all that. Too bad you're far too
> stoooopid to figure it out, though... and even if you were, you
> wouldn't, because that'd mean you'd have to admit that I (and every
> scientist and researcher using the Euler sinewave summation equation
> since 1748) were right, and you're Robert Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh,
> PA, the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL
google my address sometime. your google-stacking is "defeatored".
all anybody will ever see is your fake lotus pics!
>
>>> For the same reason you have to use negative
>>> phase angles in your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to even get
>>> it to work. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical
>>> Mega-Moron. LOL
>
>> LOL
>
>>> <http://i.imgur.com/4KfnZdN.png>
is that YOUR graph of 3-phase????
LOLOLOLOL
>
> Fag. LOL
> Idiot. LOL
> Moron. LOL
> Tranny. LOL
> Libtard. LOL
> Crackhead. LOL
> GableTard. LOL
> DildoRider. LOL
> Bad Musician. LOL
> Stick Figure. LOL
> Terrible Liar. LOL
> Obsessed Retard. LOL
> Sinewave Spammer. LOL
> Cracky McCrackhead. LOL
> Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
> Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL
> Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
> Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
> Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
> Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
> Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
> Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL
>
> <snicker>
>
--
have you heard about the lotusLoser?
he's a loser but he still keeps on tryin'...
-
"People didn't cause the Great Depression, Liberal ko0kTarD. Governmental
policy did." - Fakey in MID <7880b90ad2ecebe35ba01b4557597d80%40dizum.com>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_the_Great_Depression
"The initial stock market crash triggered a "panic sell-off" that made the
stock market go even lower."
so... so the "government" panicked, snickers?
funny that a bona-fide conservative horatio alger hero type would want the
government stepping in to save the stock market.
"Current theories may be broadly classified into two main points of view
and several heterodox points of view.
First, there are demand-driven theories, from Keynesian and institutional
economists who argue that the depression was caused by a widespread loss
of confidence that led to underconsumption. The demand-driven theories
argue that the financial crisis following the 1929 crash led to a sudden
and persistent reduction in consumption and investment spending.[1] Once
panic and deflation set in, many people believed they could avoid further
losses by keeping clear of the markets. Holding money therefore became
profitable as prices dropped lower and a given amount of money bought ever
more goods, exacerbating the drop in demand.
Second, there are the monetarists, who believe that the Great Depression
started as an ordinary recession, but that significant policy mistakes by
monetary authorities (especially the Federal Reserve), caused a shrinking
of the money supply which greatly exacerbated the economic situation,
causing a recession to descend into the Great Depression. Related to this
explanation are those who point to debt deflation causing those who borrow
to owe ever more in real terms."
wait? what? no major "third" konservative k0okTheory blaming the
government for everything mentioned?
odd, that. eh, lotusLoser?
-
the never-ending saga of fakey's "lotus"...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160408001051/http://i.imgur.com/e3OrQSq.png
-
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu
-
FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>
">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>> phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>> voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)
Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking
*moron*?
"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""
it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds. it says that you're in denial
about the inversion of your AC legs.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png
http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf
on page 2:
** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)
*COUGH*
SPNAK!!
-
i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>
-
snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:
- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:
http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html
place those files in a directory and save this file as
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.
compiles with:
gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++
run with:
./a.out
enjoy the LULZ ;)
*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
//float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
//float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);
float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
float_precision t=float_precision(0); // time variable
float_precision sum=float_precision(0); // sum of SnickerTurd's
ridiculous sinewave mess
float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25); //
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
float_precision PI;
PI =_float_table(_PI,25);
// this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
while(sum < snickerPrediction){
// fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))
+
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));
// perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh
snickerTurds
if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
}
t = t+STEP;
}
/*
Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"
Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves
never reaches that. They never reach their max values at the same time.
That's how stupid you are.
Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"
Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when
summed.
the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.
*/
cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
-
Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>
-
Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
<snicker>
Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL
<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">
on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*
*hell doesn't exist. hope everybody is having a productive evening.
-
http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg
http://cafepress.com/kooktown
http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg
-
If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :)
if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2
-
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd
-
Coming soon! To a newsgroup near you!:
$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot> I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account? <snicker>
You> Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot> Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot> Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot> Fag!
(just as useful as the original!)
-
snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden
service. It's not rocket science.
_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._ (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a
kiddie pr0n network.)
That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 17:57 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <26745180a4ed82403e4730283a529694@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #569380 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in <news:op.yfouovw1tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 00:58:50 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood > Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >> <news:op.yfoqnqfktm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >> into the wood chipper again: >>> On Sat, 09 Apr 2016 02:38:52 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood >>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>> Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka >>>> DildoRider) of 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), >>>> socked up as sucksroot@127.0.0.1, in >>>> <news:op.yfl0z702tm21m2@benson.localhost> did thusly jump head first >>>> into the wood chipper again: >>>>> On Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:33:54 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood >>>>> Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >>>>>> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is >>>>>> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL >>>>>> <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> >>>>> then why doesn't -cos(x) == acos(x)? >>>>> >>>>> also: >>>>> >>>>> -sin(x) != asin(x) >>>> For the same reason you can't grasp why your kooky sinewave >>> is that the same reason that you can't even manage to produce a "euler >>> sinewave solution" to your 6 sinewave sum? >> After your embarrassing yourself so badly over that, I felt that you >> didn't need any further embarrassment. LOL > when does that occur lotusLiar? Same as it ever occurs... every time you post, Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL >>>> subtraction equation produces sinusoids 180 degrees phase from where >>>> they're supposed to be. >>> http://i.imgur.com/Z4p1Z55.png >>> >>> explain to me the problem you have with that image. >> Negative phase angles. LOL! > so *prove* it wrong? The fact that you're the only one using your kooky sinewave subtraction equation, whereas scientists and engineers have used Euler's sinewave summation equation since 1748 proves you wrong, Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL > can you manage? no? that's what i thought. > > to model 3-phase you can define phase angles mathematically however you > desire as long as they are 120deg apart, dumbass. is that what threw you > for a loop? > > are you mad that i just so happened to choose the standard definitions of > 3 phase that most engineers use this time around? > > phase A - 0 deg > phase B - -120 deg > phase C - +120 deg > > ? Look at the Mathematical Mega-Moron backpedal and attempt to justify his mathematical mega-moronism! LOL! <https://www.quora.com/What-exactly-does-a-3-phase-supply-mean> =============================================================== What does R, Y, B mean? It stands for Red, Yellow, Blue. Its just a conventional way to represent each of the three phases. Red is assumed to start at 0 degrees, yellow at 120 degrees and blue at 240 degrees. The wiring in 3 phase machines is followed this way, so its easier to remember. These are with respect to neutral (black). =============================================================== Gee, DildoRider... the color coding in every 3-phase machine proves you wrong. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor> =============================================================== Power engineering In analysis of three phase AC power systems, usually a set of phasors is defined as the three complex cube roots of unity, graphically represented as unit magnitudes at angles of 0, 120 and 240 degrees. =============================================================== Hey, whaddayaknow?... electrical engineers use 0, 120 and 240 degrees, just as the color coding of every 3-phase machine dictates. LOL <http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/AppNotes/00889b.pdf> =============================================================== This routine will update the PWM duty cycle on CCPx according to the offset to the table with 0-120-240 degrees. =============================================================== Oh, what's that, DildoRider? Why, that's a VFD microcontroller that actual electrical engineers use to control 3-phase AC motor speed. And it uses 0, 120 and 240 degrees, too. <http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890016032.pdf> =============================================================== The three converters are phase shifted 120 and 240 degrees to produce a line-to-line six-step AC voltage. =============================================================== Gee... NASA, even on Space Station Freedom (which evolved into the ISS), uses 0, 120 and 240 degrees phase angles, at 440 VAC, 20 kHz, created from solar power DC via inverters. <https://www.aea.net/AvionicsNews/ANArchives/synchrosOct04.pdf> =============================================================== These synchro stator voltages are expressed in the following form as shown in MIL-S-20708: Es3-s1 = N Er1-r2 Sin v t Sin u Es2-s3 = N Er1-r2 Sin v t Sin (u+120) Es1-s2 = N Er1-r2 Sin v t Sin (u+240) =============================================================== Whoopsie... even the military uses 0, 120 and 240 degree phase angles, DildoRider... all the way back to WWII. LOL Imagine that, you're a lying backpedaling mathematical mega-moron. LOL <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetrical_components> =============================================================== Physically, in a three phase winding a positive sequence set of currents produces a normal rotating field, a negative sequence set produces a field with the opposite rotation, and the zero sequence set produces a field that oscillates but does not rotate between phase windings. =============================================================== DildoRider k'lames all motors spin in reverse! LOL! Or didn't DildoRider know that to reverse the spin direction of a 3-phase motor, all one has to do is swap two of the phases? Moron. LOL DildoRider's Psinewave Pspamming Psychosis: 1) You derived a higher RMS voltage than the peak voltage the RMS voltage was derived from. 2) You k'lamed a *doubling* of voltage as a resultant of all three phases of 3-phase AC, akin to shorting all three phases together. 3) You k'lamed a resultant of 0 volts between any two phases of 3-phase AC. 4) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why two phases *summed* gave a sinewave of the same voltage but phase shifted 60 degrees from each of the tributary sinewaves, such that the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third phase. 5) You demonstrated your inability to grasp why all three phases of 3-phase AC *summed* together gives a result of 0 volts. 6) You k'lamed you were feeding 240 volts to the *primary* of a *substation* transformer, deriving 120 volts from the *primary* side, then feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208 volt electrical feed... you even went so far as to justify it with your kooky math, showing you were deriving 208 volts from 240 volts. Then you backpedaled and k'lamed you were instead feeding the primary with a voltage of "12 kVA" (DildoRider's blather), proving you don't know the difference between voltage and apparent power. 7) You showed how you could derived any voltage of any polarity from 0 volts. 8) You *still* can't figure out why the resultant L-L of two phases of 3-phase AC would *lead* Phase A by 30 degrees... your kooky sinewave subtraction equation graphed it *lagging*. To fix that, you started using negative phase angles. 9) You lied and claimed that electrical engineers use negative phase sequencing to justify your having to use negative phase angles in your kooky sinewave subtraction equation. And you still don't know what a gable is. 150 IQ? LOL >> You can't even get your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to get the >> proper phase shift without using them, and switching the phases in >> your moronic equation changes the phase of the sinusoid. The Euler >> sinewave summation equation fixes all that. Too bad you're far too >> stoooopid to figure it out, though... and even if you were, you >> wouldn't, because that'd mean you'd have to admit that I (and every >> scientist and researcher using the Euler sinewave summation equation >> since 1748) were right, and you're Robert Michael Wolfe of Pittsburgh, >> PA, the Mathematical Mega-Moron. LOL > google my address sometime. your google-stacking is "defeatored". > > all anybody will ever see is your fake lotus pics! Funny, all I see is real estate websites showing that your shitshack shanty is worth less than half the average price of any of the surrounding properties. Likely because you live in what's now considered a high-crime area... that's what happens when you let low-rent stalking crackheads like you move into the neighborhood... you drag down the property values. LOL Although I do note that after I get to the bottom of the second page of results (all real estate websites above that point), just after the obituary for Rose Goldstein, who died in *your* bedroom, DildoRider, the results are pretty hilarious. LOL >>>> For the same reason you have to use negative >>>> phase angles in your kooky sinewave subtraction equation to even get >>>> it to work. Because you're Robert Michael Wolfe the Mathematical >>>> Mega-Moron. LOL >>> LOL >>>> <http://i.imgur.com/4KfnZdN.png> > is that YOUR graph of 3-phase???? That's me SPNAK!ing you for your stupid question... Some mathematical mega-moron dribbled: ==================================== then why doesn't -cos(x) == acos(x)? also: -sin(x) != asin(x) ==================================== It's not surprising that you don't understand it, Mathematical Mega-Moron. > LOLOLOLOL LOLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOL Fag. LOL Idiot. LOL Moron. LOL Tranny. LOL Libtard. LOL Diddler. LOL Crackhead. LOL GableTard. LOL DildoRider. LOL Bad Musician. LOL Stick Figure. LOL Terrible Liar. LOL Obsessed Retard. LOL Sinewave Spammer. LOL Cracky McCrackhead. LOL Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL Photofuckering Fuckwit. LOL Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In Usenet History. LOL <snicker> -- Robert Michael Wolfe the Pittsburgh Pied Piper Of Penis (aka DildoRider, aka Teh Mop Jockey) 5907 Stanton Ave. Pittsburgh, PA (412) 853-6395 (412) 799-0532 (412) 665-8289 (412) 404-8757 DildoRider admits he's stoooopid: MID: <c65504c436778934b3e8a0fb022b7618@dizum.com> ================================================= >> it appears I've kicked your ass so hard it's >> damaged your brain, DildoRider. > then it appears that you like shooting fish in > barrels, intellectually lazy fuckhead that you are. Well, you've just admitted that intellectually kicking your ass is akin to shooting fish in a barrel... IOW, you've admitted that you're stoooopid. No un-ringing that bell. <snicker> ================================================= DildoRider admits he's "really stupid" (his words). LOL MID: <8a9faed11123abfaa1257fb33fb0c082@dizum.com> ================================================= > so what you're saying is that your targets for attack > have to be really stupid or else you can't manage? ================================================= DildoRider admits much more about himself: MID: <36c6802852caf4f712515dedb738e450@dizum.com> ================================================= "absolutely and completely retarded, insane, gay, ugly, smelly, toothless, dirt-poor, incontinent and possibly homeless" ================================================= This is a libtard's method of "winning", for fuck sake. 150 IQ? LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 10:18 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Faketards answer to everything he has to run away from. |
| Message-ID | <85vkgb9gd3l2ointuovjetci06qfc4jl3t@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569457 |
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:57:46 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: >Euler's sinewave summation equation
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 09:42 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Faketards answer to everything he has to run away from. |
| Message-ID | <q2ulgbtuk1mdhv3gl5r7mp0g8ibamhgiq9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569459 |
Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 17:57:46 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote > Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote: > > >Euler's sinewave summation equation [TINESSE]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 08:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <bf338987ec974f9d00c7f415a6dbb9a0@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #568977 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:crsfgb1dfn7cr5q299act1hbjd72tkl5jk@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in >>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: >>>>>> And now he's so butthurt he's cowardly snipping again! Baahahahaaa! >>>>> Sorry, fakey, you have said nothing worthy of >>>>> consideration. Try again. >>>> You pathetic backpedaling cowardly snipping piece of shit. You're so >>>> spanked you can't even stop yourself from cowardly snipping and lying. >>>> LOL >>> Try >> Have you figured out yet that the inverse *function* of cosine is >> arccosine, and the inverse *function* of sine is arcsine? LOL > Now fakey is reduced to crying about things i never said. You were discussing cosine being the derivative of sine via the equation d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x). Then you started bleating about "inverse operators" by bleating: "You still don't have a clue what a derivitive is, or what its inverse operation is." (while misspelling "derivative" LOL), you backpedaling spankard. Because you don't know the difference between an inverse operation and cofunctionality. So go on, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... tell us what the "inverse operation" of the derivative d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) is. Go on. Go rape Google for as long as you need, then come back to prove yourself an even bigger moron. LOL > Tell everyone your usenet master has left you a quivering Have you figured out yet the difference between Euler's Theorems and Euler's Formulas, Mathematical Moron? LOL > blob of jello, twisting in the wind. Have you figured out yet that there are _three_ methods of mathematically approximating RMS voltage, Mathematical Moron? LOL > Careful, those tears might melt you, fakey. Have you figured out yet that RMS voltage is a mathematical approximation, Mathematical Moron? LOL > When are you gonna invoke the ESSE [TINESSE] to do some Have you figured out yet that the inverse _function_ of cosine is arccosine, and the inverse _function_ of sine is arcsine? LOL <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> > fazer maffs on usenet? Have you figured out yet the difference between inverse operations and cofunctionality, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL RUN, SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RRRUUUUUUNNNNN!!! <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. That RMS voltage is a mathematical approximation. That there are _three_ methods of mathematically approximating RMS voltage. The difference between Euler's Theorems and Euler's Formulas. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-10 15:09 +0800 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <pvujgbtu76ehuqggf4266chs72s3f3jra9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #569157 |
Fakey wrote: <meandering misdirection & desperate denial SNIPped> *yawn*...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 07:48 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <b680da9387ee75d892bf4580451cba85@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #569391 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in <news:pvujgbtu76ehuqggf4266chs72s3f3jra9@4ax.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again: > <meandering misdirection & desperate denial SNIPped> > > *yawn*... I spanked you so hard you cowardly snipped it all out, you spineless bleatfarting blither-blathering mathematical moron. ========================================================= > You still don't have a clue what a derivitive is, or what > its inverse operation is. Shiny Tinfoil Spankard claims the co-functionality of sine and cosine are "inverse operations" and not co-functionality. Addition and subtraction are inverse operations, Moron. Multiplication and division are inverse operations, Moron. This is exactly what I mean when I say that you rummage through Google for some bit of knowledge which you think will make you seem like "not-a-moron", run to Usenet with it, and prove yourself a moron. LOL The inverse function of cosine is arccosine. The inverse function of sine is arcsine. You're a moron. LOL <http://i.imgur.com/Ono41sn.png> You were discussing cosine being the derivative of sine via the equation d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x). Then you bleated: "You still don't have a clue what a derivitive is, or what its inverse operation is." (while misspelling "derivative" LOL), you backpedaling spankard. Because you don't know the difference between an inverse operation and co-functionality. So go on, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... tell us what the "inverse operation" of the derivative d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x) is. Go on. Go ransack Google for as long as you need, then come back to prove yourself an even bigger moron. LOL ========================================================= RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!! <snicker> -- Shiny Tinfoil Spankard (aka Bite My Shiny Metal Ass) didn't know: ===================================== MID: <13d33d0638e0ec690b63393d0710f658@dizum.com> MID: <80d61a6928a9e7df316c519affcf3838@dizum.com> The Euler equation is a subset of equations known as the Euler-Fourier Formulas, thus that a sinewave is a transformation of a circle (which should have been intuitive, given that generators *rotate* to create *sinusoids*). MID: <ff81cb60204ffbd777cd15a6261cfb67@dizum.com> That cross correlation is used with Fourier transforms. That superposition is the same as wave interference. That wave interference works the same for standing or traveling waves. That RMS and peak-to-peak voltage are two different things. That RMS isn't a DC voltage. That 170 volt peak, 120.208 volt RMS L-N 3-phase service gives 208.207 volts RMS L-L. That 4444525800 != 4400000000 != 1. The difference between frequency and period of a sinewave. That there's no difference between 'i' and 'j' in electrical engineering, physics and control systems engineering. What a positive or negative vector is. That the vector sum of 3-phase AC constitutes a closed loop per Kirchhoff's Voltage Law, thus that the three phases sum to zero. That "mnemonic" is not spelled "mneumonic". That "gaffe" is not spelled "gaff". That his claim: "Water is tetrahedral. It actually has 4 poles, 2 positive and 2 negative." is nonsense from a blathering moron. That the term "electronegativity" denotes a *positive* effective nuclear charge. What the definition of the word "equivalent" is. That digital voltmeters do indeed take discrete instantaneous samples. That the atmosphere (and the gaseous phase water within the atmosphere) does indeed follow the Ideal Gas Law to within 1.337842% margin of error *worst* *case* at 70 F. That the square of the instantaneous sample of peak-to-peak voltage of a peak-voltage sinewave is an offset sinewave, thus its average does *not* equal zero, as Shiny Tinfoil Brain k'lames. That the Ideal Gas Law does not require an ideal gas because it takes into account molar volume. That "within 10% error" does not equal "10% error". That water can be plasmized. That atomic number does not equal effective nuclear charge. MID: <382fa822c6dbca9a6f88cab5a104bf62@dizum.com> That formulas *are* math. How to use a graphing calculator. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> What LaTeX notation is. MID: <8e4e21f5748d85599f700ee8ff174611@dizum.com> That LaTeX notation *is* "plain text", not a script. MID: <c1c02875af2c6615bd30ab20416b75b5@dizum.com> That a formula in LaTeX notation is still a formula. That scientific notation and LaTeX notation are not the same. DUURRRHH! GoogleTard. LOL That LaTeX notation can be copy-n-pasted into a LaTeX compatible program to view the formula. That image size != image resolution. That inverse operations are not inverse functions. That RMS voltage is a mathematical approximation. That there are _three_ methods of mathematically approximating RMS voltage. The difference between Euler's Theorems and Euler's Formulas. And the moron continues to demonstrate his inability to read a graph. ===================================== Shiny Tinfoil Spankard the Mathematical Moron maunders and mewls: ===================================== "All you've shown us is graphs of formulas. No equal signs, no maths done." - Shiny Tinfoil Brain demonstrates his Mathematical Moronism. ===================================== SPNAK! <snicker>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 07:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Our very own "chinese room" |
| Message-ID | <dn3n3nFr88hU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #569868 |
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:48:46 +0200, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote: > Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> > > Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in > <news:pvujgbtu76ehuqggf4266chs72s3f3jra9@4ax.com> did thusly jump head >> You still don't have a clue what a derivitive is, or what its inverse >> operation is. > > Shiny Tinfoil Spankard claims the co-functionality of sine and cosine > are "inverse operations" and not co-functionality. Bub, take a look in the mirror. It's clear you're in over your head. Your sentence above is almost a complete non sequitur from what BMSMA just said. It would be a _complete_ non sequitur if sine and cosine didn't factor in to what was saying. The inverse operation to the derivative is the integral. No matter what the semantics, it's clear this is what he's talking about, and only the most Derridian wackadoodle deconstructionist would go off on the (literary) tangent that you did intentionally. But that's not what happened. Ordinarily, I'd be confused why in another post, you would go as far as to state this very fact, then when parsing his statement above, have it go right over your head. But there's nothing confusing about that, because you are a chinese room simulation. > The inverse function of cosine is arccosine. The inverse function of > sine is arcsine. You're a moron. LOL Except he wasn't talking about that, he was talking about the inverse operation of a derivative. That _happens_ to be a relationship between sin(x) and cos(x), but you've gone off talking about cofunctions and arcsine/arccosine and other irrelevancies that have nothing to do with what BMSMA was talking about. So, okay, you're learning something -- I get that. Go ahead and integrate cos(x), just don't make the common trivial mistake that is the source of some humor among mathematicians. > RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUUNNNNNN!!!! I think my irony circuits just scrammed. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web