Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #678885 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-29 06:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-05 14:42 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 226 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 06:12 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 08:55 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-03-29 10:03 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:11 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 13:51 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 13:56 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-03-30 05:40 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-30 09:04 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-03-30 08:25 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-30 11:53 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 07:30 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 19:46 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 10:08 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 19:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:56 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 11:27 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 22:00 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 14:57 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:41 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 17:31 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 11:46 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-02 10:37 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 22:11 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 00:03 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:27 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:25 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:12 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 20:10 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 13:18 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 23:12 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 14:39 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:40 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:15 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:04 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:02 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 00:01 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:25 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:16 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 19:38 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-01 12:39 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-02 11:22 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 18:29 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 12:07 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-04-02 22:26 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-02 05:35 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 09:29 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 19:57 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 15:51 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:30 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-03 14:20 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 12:23 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 13:47 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 13:21 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 15:39 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:54 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:03 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 14:09 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 18:48 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:15 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:23 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:40 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:51 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:57 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 19:39 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 18:43 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 19:48 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 18:50 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:53 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:04 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-03 07:09 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:31 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:13 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:45 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:29 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 05:46 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:49 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:20 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:25 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 18:38 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:45 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 01:50 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 13:37 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 02:12 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 02:31 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 06:53 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 17:57 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 18:20 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 09:42 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:52 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 20:18 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 15:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 00:46 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 19:14 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-01 15:34 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-02 18:10 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-03 16:38 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 09:35 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 06:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:19 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 15:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 08:01 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 16:06 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 09:05 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 18:58 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:04 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:17 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:37 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:50 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:29 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:13 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 12:39 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:35 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 15:44 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 14:58 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 07:21 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 19:14 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:41 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 22:49 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 14:03 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 09:15 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-04 10:20 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 08:32 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 10:55 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 19:16 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 13:17 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 14:33 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 18:17 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:23 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:24 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 08:35 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:41 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 20:06 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 10:19 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 22:35 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-05 13:44 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 23:04 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-05 07:00 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-05 08:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-05 09:47 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-05 08:57 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-06 06:17 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-05 15:26 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-06 06:43 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-05 15:54 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-05 14:00 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-06 07:04 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-05 20:33 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-05 17:39 -0700
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-05 20:46 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-05 20:31 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-05 20:27 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 19:38 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 22:37 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-04 17:40 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:59 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 20:18 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-03 17:16 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-04 10:02 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-03 18:14 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-03 19:17 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 20:40 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-01 11:28 +1000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-31 22:05 -0400
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-01 08:57 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-01 04:42 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-01 06:29 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-02 17:34 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-02 13:26 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-02 20:05 +0000
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-02 15:41 -0500
NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 19:17 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 13:20 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:26 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:36 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:46 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:02 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-05 11:21 -0700
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Tom Niven <tniven7694@herringmail.invalid> - 2018-04-05 14:51 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-04-05 17:38 +0100
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-05 11:04 -0700
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-06 17:36 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-06 11:42 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-06 20:11 +0100
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-06 12:48 -0500
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-06 11:52 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-04-06 10:49 -0700
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-06 19:25 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-06 13:57 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-06 20:19 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-06 14:31 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-06 21:41 -0700
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-07 00:50 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-06 20:01 -0500
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-06 20:39 -0600
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps ❄ Snowflake ❄ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-06 21:56 -0500
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-05 11:20 -0700
Re: MORE NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 11:13 -0400
Re: MORE NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-07 23:41 +0000
Re: MORE NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-07 17:57 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-04 18:25 -0400
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 16:33 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-04-04 22:47 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:03 -0600
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-04 23:52 +0000
Re: NOMINATIONS Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-04 17:55 -0600
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-03-31 23:14 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-31 20:23 -0500
Re: Climate change is shrinking mountain hares' habitat in the Alps % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 18:28 -0700
China is winning the game (imperialism). Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 08:46 -0700
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 11:14 -0500
If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-29 09:26 -0700
Re: If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 15:05 -0500
Re: If your ambition is that low, you deserve it, right ? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 18:00 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 13:53 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-03-29 14:32 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-03-29 13:34 -0700
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-29 17:54 -0400
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-29 18:33 -0500
Re: China is winning the game (imperialism). Tom Niven <tniven7694@herringmail.invalid> - 2018-04-05 14:42 +0000
Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 18:15 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <0768cd186jo7d2tfd907satp1o6t3s60es@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679826 |
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>> >>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>> >>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>> not lost. >>>> >>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>> >>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >> >> >> Yup.....meth too. >> > >Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >old light bulb ? If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive for.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 17:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b5treu.7h0.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #679833 |
On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>> >>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>> >>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>> not lost. >>>>> >>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>> >>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>> >>> >>> Yup.....meth too. >>> >> >> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >> old light bulb ? > > If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all > across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive > for. > just gimme the schneef
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 18:26 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <kq68cd1v4257nnvlamdjp2gtle03qp079c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679836 |
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>> >>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>> >>>> >>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>> >>> >>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>> old light bulb ? >> >> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >> for. >> >just gimme the schneef a little boogar sugar
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 17:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b5tsfs.m6j.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #679837 |
On 2018-04-03 5:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>>> >>>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>>> old light bulb ? >>> >>> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >>> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >>> for. >>> >> just gimme the schneef > > a little boogar sugar > snout wax
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 18:51 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <qc88cd962dvvdlpujvrma8ttf43v28ug4c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679839 |
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:40:58 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-04-03 5:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>>>> old light bulb ? >>>> >>>> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >>>> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >>>> for. >>>> >>> just gimme the schneef >> >> a little boogar sugar >> >snout wax bank buster
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 17:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b5ttfi.mvb.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #679842 |
On 2018-04-03 5:51 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:40:58 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-04-03 5:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>>>>> old light bulb ? >>>>> >>>>> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >>>>> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >>>>> for. >>>>> >>>> just gimme the schneef >>> >>> a little boogar sugar >>> >> snout wax > > bank buster > cab ride
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 19:39 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <96b8cdtiglrheanbv5n2i1l82j505jlucd@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679844 |
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:57:52 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-04-03 5:51 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:40:58 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-04-03 5:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>>>>>> old light bulb ? >>>>>> >>>>>> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >>>>>> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >>>>>> for. >>>>>> >>>>> just gimme the schneef >>>> >>>> a little boogar sugar >>>> >>> snout wax >> >> bank buster >> >cab ride carpet crawler
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 18:43 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b5u053.jjk.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #679852 |
On 2018-04-03 6:39 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:57:52 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-04-03 5:51 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:40:58 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-04-03 5:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>>>>>>> old light bulb ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >>>>>>> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >>>>>>> for. >>>>>>> >>>>>> just gimme the schneef >>>>> >>>>> a little boogar sugar >>>>> >>>> snout wax >>> >>> bank buster >>> >> cab ride > > carpet crawler > coleradie come about
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 19:48 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <jmb8cdlddsf5b5nirr4qh1a3s2b49vu09q@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679853 |
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:43:29 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-04-03 6:39 PM, Skeeter wrote: >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:57:52 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 2018-04-03 5:51 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:40:58 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2018-04-03 5:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>>>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>>>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>>>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>>>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>>>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>>>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>>>>>>>> old light bulb ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >>>>>>>> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> just gimme the schneef >>>>>> >>>>>> a little boogar sugar >>>>>> >>>>> snout wax >>>> >>>> bank buster >>>> >>> cab ride >> >> carpet crawler >> >coleradie come about Tijuana turn arounds
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 18:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b5u0hi.jjk.17.8@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #679854 |
On 2018-04-03 6:48 PM, Skeeter wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:43:29 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-04-03 6:39 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:57:52 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-04-03 5:51 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:40:58 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2018-04-03 5:26 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 17:23:24 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 5:15 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:48:34 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 4:03 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:59:46 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2018-04-03 1:54 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:39:37 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 2:21 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:47:06 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 1:23 PM, Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:20:41 -0400, benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 10:30 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/3/2018 12:51 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/04/2018 9:57 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 10:29 AM, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/2/2018 4:35 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/1/2018 12:39 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Climate does not take place in a glass jar! 19 century theories aren't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct. Co2 is NOT a major greenhouse gas. Nobody had even done >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tmospheric spectra then to find CO2 bands saturated. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://skepticalscience.com/saturated-co2-effect.htm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Water vapor is the largest greenhouse gas, which is ignored by glowball >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worming activists. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note, "kensi" digs up fake science website of failed Oz cartoonist as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some kind of scientific proof. Pathetic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh what the hell! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA probably the 20% they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimate is WAY exaggerated. And remember the human contribution to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that 20% is just a Minor fraction of that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **The contribution of CO2 varies from around 9% ~ 26%, depending on a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> number of factors. Since humans have increased the level of CO2 in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> atmosphere by approximately 43%, since the 18th century, you cannot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> claim that the human contribution is minor. It is most significant. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bullshit, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the paper clearly says Water Vapor is 50% to 67% of the effect, then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clouds, 25%, and you say CO2 is 9% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> READ THE PAPERs, but you rather to post your parrot propaganda of the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shallow minds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why are Democrats pushing for legalizing POT ? to keep voters stupid. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit is exactly correct. More exactly Trevor shit as he pulled his >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 43% right out of his ass. Truth is he's just making it up to scare >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people. Yep, nothing but lies to push his scam. He has no idea how much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CO2 is caused by man. He's just looking at a fake "hockey stick" of CO2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and pretending that it all came from man. Pseudoscience. Truth is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planet Earth has a natural CO2 cycle that controls levels. Other planets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> do not which is why they aren't fit places to live. The NASA website >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> used to have a big explanation of this on their website, but but they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pulled that part down as a cover-up to make Trevor's lies more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "plausible". The Oceans, water vapor etc. are all part of this natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cycle. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a partial explanation of that cycle from Germany: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "It is ten times as likely that atmospheric CO2 is coming from natural >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sources, namely the warming ocean surface, as it is likely that it is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> coming from anthropogenic sources. The changes in CO2 track ocean >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surface temperature, not global carbon emissions. Burning fossil fuels >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not increasing atmospheric CO2. Recovery from the Little Ice Age, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> driven by the sun, is causing the oceans to release CO2. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> temperature driving CO2 release, not the other way around. Just as it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has always been." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notrickszone.com/2013/03/02/most-of-the-rise-in-co2-likely-comes-from-natural-sources/#sthash.c34J9eHL.dpbs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I've said here all along. Trevor is a lying scammer con man trying to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sell the idea that man is causing the temperatures to rise by burning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things (like rain forests) and that only a huge energy tax for them to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste can save us all. It's nothing but criminal fraud. Listening or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trying to discuss anything intelligent with such a fraudster is a total >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waste of your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even people that smoke pot know that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pot smokers like global worming, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as the all the plants get bigger, back to rainforests of huge pot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plants, plus smoking them creates heat, which helps heat the planet up, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and warm the wintertimes. Win-Win >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh...um...I smoke pot and I hate libtards and think glow ball warming >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a scam. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.... compair climate change effects on beer, wine, gin, vodka, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiskey, and alkichoul production, they are all plant based too, so they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> win if the temperature goes up as well. it will cost a little more for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ice. Don't try to chug warm Champagne though from the bottle, it all >>>>>>>>>>>>>> turns to bubbles in 1 second, and comes back out, spewed thusly... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> seriously though, I wonder how long the press can keep the illusion >>>>>>>>>>>>>> alive about global warming perhaps another decade. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not lost. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have thawed out many frozen pipes with a incandescent bulb. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> i've smoked hash oil off a lightbulb >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yup.....meth too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have you heard that with each prescription of Medical Meth you get an >>>>>>>>>> old light bulb ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If Trump has his way there will be light bulb transfer stations all >>>>>>>>> across California. Kleen needles and kleen bulbs, it's what we strive >>>>>>>>> for. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> just gimme the schneef >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a little boogar sugar >>>>>>> >>>>>> snout wax >>>>> >>>>> bank buster >>>>> >>>> cab ride >>> >>> carpet crawler >>> >> coleradie come about > > Tijuana turn arounds > tit talc
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-04 08:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pa2hrs$mj9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679794 |
On 4/3/2018 4:39 PM, Sergio wrote: > At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, > and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy > not lost. *headdesk* at the science-illiterate kO0k. IT'S *TUNGSTEN*, YOU GOOFBALL! See what I'm dealing with here? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-04 08:57 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pa2ljl$t6r$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679893 |
On 4/4/2018 7:53 AM, kensi wrote: > On 4/3/2018 4:39 PM, Sergio wrote: > >> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >> not lost. > > *headdesk* at the science-illiterate kO0k. > > IT'S *TUNGSTEN*, YOU GOOFBALL! > > See what I'm dealing with here? > you focus on engrlish instead of the science, you fail again. but you can post this in alt.spelting.gooder.Engrlish
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-04 08:04 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <5qm9cddrrb5hj4769cfjvsjdhc5bf2lfni@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #679893 |
On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 08:53:17 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 4/3/2018 4:39 PM, Sergio wrote: > >> At least we have LED lightbulbs now, but the cost about 3 times more, >> and the heat from old tunston bulb is a benifit in winter time, energy >> not lost. > >*headdesk* at the science-illiterate kO0k. > >IT'S *TUNGSTEN*, YOU GOOFBALL! > >See what I'm dealing with here? I see someone who uses a typo to run from getting slapped yet again.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 07:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p9vnck$1i6k$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679669 |
On 4/2/2018 7:57 PM, benj wrote: > I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG but > then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their ears and > sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! > > Oh what the hell! > > http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf Oops. That's not nasa.gov, that's some site in Luxembourg of all places. > Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA Except it isn't. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-03 09:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pa038t$ai4$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679735 |
On 4/3/2018 6:09 AM, kensi wrote: > On 4/2/2018 7:57 PM, benj wrote: >> I could reference NASA peer reviewed paper proving CO2 is minor GHG >> but then Trevor and "Kensi" would just stick their fingers in their >> ears and sing: La LA La La LA! YOU POSTED NOTHING!!!! >> >> Oh what the hell! >> >> http://meteo.lcd.lu/globalwarming/Schmidt/attribution_present_GH_effect_2010.pdf >> > > Oops. That's not nasa.gov, that's some site in Luxembourg of all places. > >> Note CO2 is MINOR GHG and given this is NASA > > Except it isn't. > read the paper, Water Vapor is 67%, look at table 2 at the end. Then read the paper. can you read technical papers pupa?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 06:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p9pta1$10k$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #679334 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 22:00:13 -0400, benj wrote: > On 3/31/2018 9:27 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 1/04/2018 10:56 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>>> snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>>>> kensi pupa posted? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you >>>>>>>> froth so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie >>>>>>>> to your k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the >>>>>>> fact with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>> >>>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>> >>>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back >>>> any of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my >>>> questions and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You >>>> are a lying moron. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no >>>>>>> science. >>>>>> >>>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>>> >>>>> True, >>>> >>>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one >>>> of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be >>>> holding my breath. >>>> >>>> >>> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. >> >> **Do they? Prove it. Prove that conservatives don't do exactly the same >> thing. Nonetheless, I called you a liar, because you ARE a liar. An >> ignorant one, at that. > > I called YOU a liar because you are one. That's your job I think. > >> I note that you >>> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. >> >> **You only need to ask: >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Angier > > Pulitzer prize is proof of science knowledge? I don't think so. Anyway > life sciences and medicine aren't real science. No True Scotsman now? >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Ball > > Getting Closer. I mean he was once "sort of: a physicist before he > discovered he was liberal. I'd have to read his latest book on QM to see > if his head is up his arse or not. Oh that's easy enough to check. Does he favor MWI, absent direct evidence against? Then his head isn't. Does he favor some sort of non-unitary, non- local, non-time-symmetric, etc. etc. etc. (kensi could tell you the rest), and most of all non-*testable* collapse mechanism? Then his head is so far up there he doesn't need a doctor's help to check himself for colon cancer every year. > Clearly he is not quite a Journalist though he regularly "contributes" > to rags like NYT, Guardian and Erm, the last time I checked, people who *regularly* have (non- advertising) articles accepted at major newspapers like NYT and the Guardian are called ... drumroll ... journalists. >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking > > Can't you get the difference between journalist and writer? hey I have > written books and articles on science. I'm not a journalist. A broadish definition of journalist is "writer of nonfiction for a lay audience". Since some of Hawking's nonfiction books are for a lay audience he falls within that definition. >> I can live >>> with a single theoretical exception. >> >> **Except, Mr Liar, it ain't theoretical. It's actual. > > Except Mr. propagandist you have still not proved the premise wrong > except by your fantasies and stretching meanings. See above, kooky. >>> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have >>> sold out for money, fame, employment etc. >> >> **Sure. There's quite a few who have done that. I would argue that they >> are likely in the minority. > > Science is not done by majority vote no matter what you science deniers > pretend. Peer review is sorta similar, though. > There is no such thing as the "settled science" you warmballers always > pretend exists. Sure there is. There's stuff that's bleeding edge (a lot of quantum physics stuff, still), then there's stuff that's considered close to rock solid (only a paradigm shift of Einsteinian proportions, akin to the discovery of relativity, could conceivably shake it). Right now, rock- solid includes the basic laws of mechanics (adjusted for relativity and QM where circumstances warrant), quantum electrodynamics (for the particle physics scale stuff), and general relativity, evolution in biology, the usual textbook introductory material about geology in particular age, size, and structure of the Earth, and so forth. Oh, and thermodynamics, which I'm given to understand is a statistical consequence of the laws of mechanics. And which is the rock solid foundation of the settled science of climate change. >> and purposely lie and distort >>> facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you >>> Trevor? >> >> **LOL! Let me remind you, Mr Liar, that I have posed a great many >> questions and comments to you. You have failed miserably to respond >> and/or answer. The obvious conclusion is that you know when you are >> beaten, so you just give up and scurry away. > > I have provided links to actual science an you keep pretending there is > nothing and you heard nothing. So this: Stick your fingers in your ears > and sing La LA LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! and that will "prove" I've > never answered any of your so-called questions. I'm still waiting for > your reply on the "Casualty of CO2 from 1940-1979 when CO2 went UP and > Temperature went DOWN! Oh that's right YOU CAN'T HEAR ME! LA LA LA LA > LA! Now where's that bookmark kensi sent me ... Ah, yes: https://skepticalscience.com/global-cooling-mid-20th-century-advanced.htm SPNAK! >> I've dealt with your kind before. Blowhards, with no real knowledge >> outside what they're fed by Fox. IOW: A moron. > > I've dealt with 6th graders like you before too. In fact, years ago I > actually was one! Calling people names really shows just how "mature" > you folks in Oz are. We're not much better in Az, you chucklefuck. <snicker> > Why should I waste my valuable time on kooks like you? How ironic, coming from the only kook of us three. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 01:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5sidnfm7qZKOHV3HnZ2dnUU7-R_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #679366 |
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 06:13:21 -0000 (UTC), LO AND BEHOLD; "Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <p9pta1$10k$2@dont-email.me>: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 22:00:13 -0400, benj wrote: > >>On 3/31/2018 9:27 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>On 1/04/2018 10:56 AM, benj wrote: >>>>On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>>>>On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>>>>>>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>>>>>why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link kensi pupa >>>>>>>>>>posted? >>>>>>>>>If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you froth >>>>>>>>>so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie to your >>>>>>>>>k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>>>Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly froth. >>>>>>>>It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs are are all >>>>>>>>nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear exposure of you >>>>>>>>lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact with bluster. >>>>>>>>Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>>>>**Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>>>>Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>>>>**Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>>>>of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>>>>and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>>>>moron. >>>>>>>>Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>>>>**Not necessarily. >>>>>>True, >>>>>**There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one of >>>>>your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding my >>>>>breath. >>>>Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. >>>**Do they? Prove it. Prove that conservatives don't do exactly the same >>>thing. Nonetheless, I called you a liar, because you ARE a liar. An >>>ignorant one, at that. >>I called YOU a liar because you are one. That's your job I think. >>> I note that you >>>>provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. >>>**You only need to ask: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natalie_Angier >>Pulitzer prize is proof of science knowledge? I don't think so. Anyway >>life sciences and medicine aren't real science. > >No True Scotsman now? > >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Ball >>Getting Closer. I mean he was once "sort of: a physicist before he >>discovered he was liberal. I'd have to read his latest book on QM to >>see if his head is up his arse or not. > >Oh that's easy enough to check. Does he favor MWI, absent direct >evidence against? Then his head isn't. Does he favor some sort of >non-unitary, non- local, non-time-symmetric, etc. etc. etc. (kensi >could tell you the rest), and most of all non-*testable* collapse >mechanism? Then his head is so far up there he doesn't need a doctor's >help to check himself for colon cancer every year. > >>Clearly he is not quite a Journalist though he regularly "contributes" >>to rags like NYT, Guardian and > >Erm, the last time I checked, people who *regularly* have (non- >advertising) articles accepted at major newspapers like NYT and the >Guardian are called ... drumroll ... journalists. > >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Hawking >>Can't you get the difference between journalist and writer? hey I have >>written books and articles on science. I'm not a journalist. > >A broadish definition of journalist is "writer of nonfiction for a lay >audience". Since some of Hawking's nonfiction books are for a lay >audience he falls within that definition. > >>> I can live >>>>with a single theoretical exception. >>>**Except, Mr Liar, it ain't theoretical. It's actual. >>Except Mr. propagandist you have still not proved the premise wrong >>except by your fantasies and stretching meanings. > >See above, kooky. > >>>>I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have >>>>sold out for money, fame, employment etc. >>>**Sure. There's quite a few who have done that. I would argue that they >>>are likely in the minority. >>Science is not done by majority vote no matter what you science deniers >>pretend. > >Peer review is sorta similar, though. > >>There is no such thing as the "settled science" you warmballers always >>pretend exists. > >Sure there is. There's stuff that's bleeding edge (a lot of quantum >physics stuff, still), then there's stuff that's considered close to >rock solid (only a paradigm shift of Einsteinian proportions, akin to >the discovery of relativity, could conceivably shake it). Right now, >rock- solid includes the basic laws of mechanics (adjusted for >relativity and QM where circumstances warrant), quantum electrodynamics >(for the particle physics scale stuff), and general relativity, >evolution in biology, the usual textbook introductory material about >geology in particular age, size, and structure of the Earth, and so >forth. Oh, and thermodynamics, which I'm given to understand is a >statistical consequence of the laws of mechanics. And which is the rock >solid foundation of the settled science of climate change. > >>> and purposely lie and distort >>>>facts for their handlers even though they know better. Is that you >>>>Trevor? >>>**LOL! Let me remind you, Mr Liar, that I have posed a great many >>>questions and comments to you. You have failed miserably to respond >>>and/or answer. The obvious conclusion is that you know when you are >>>beaten, so you just give up and scurry away. >>I have provided links to actual science an you keep pretending there is >>nothing and you heard nothing. So this: Stick your fingers in your ears >>and sing La LA LA LA LA! I CAN'T HEAR YOU! and that will "prove" I've >>never answered any of your so-called questions. I'm still waiting for >>your reply on the "Casualty of CO2 from 1940-1979 when CO2 went UP and >>Temperature went DOWN! Oh that's right YOU CAN'T HEAR ME! LA LA LA LA >>LA! > >Now where's that bookmark kensi sent me ... > >Ah, yes: > >https://skepticalscience.com/global-cooling-mid-20th-century-advanced.ht >m > >SPNAK! > >>>I've dealt with your kind before. Blowhards, with no real knowledge >>>outside what they're fed by Fox. IOW: A moron. >>I've dealt with 6th graders like you before too. In fact, years ago I >>actually was one! Calling people names really shows just how "mature" >>you folks in Oz are. > >We're not much better in Az, you chucklefuck. > ><💩snickerTurd💩> > >>Why should I waste my valuable time on kooks like you? > >How ironic, coming from the only kook of us three. maybe he can punch some QM panels next time? he could offer the shroedingers or the heisenbergs. the cost of the shroedingers is "up in the air" while the heisenbergs aren't for sale if you know the price. -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 06:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <p9qca5$v6g$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679366 |
On 4/1/2018 2:13 AM, Nadegda wrote: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 22:00:13 -0400, benj wrote: >> Getting Closer. I mean he was once "sort of: a physicist before he >> discovered he was liberal. I'd have to read his latest book on QM to see >> if his head is up his arse or not. > > Oh that's easy enough to check. Does he favor MWI, absent direct evidence > against? Then his head isn't. Does he favor some sort of non-unitary, non- > local, non-time-symmetric, etc. etc. etc. (kensi could tell you the rest), > and most of all non-*testable* collapse mechanism? Then his head is so far > up there he doesn't need a doctor's help to check himself for colon cancer > every year. LOL! And very well remembered, though, the exact list is: Non-linear, non-unitary, non-differentiable, non-local in configuration space, non-local in (ordinary) space, non-CPT-symmetric, Liouville-theorem-violating, Lorentz-noninvariant, non-deterministic, *and* faster-than-light. [rest of benj being spanked to blisters snipped for brevity] -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 05:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p9prmo$10k$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #679324 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: > On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>> kensi pupa posted? >>>>>> >>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you >>>>>> froth so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie >>>>>> to your k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>> >>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact >>>>> with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>> >>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>> >>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >> >> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >> of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >> and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >> moron. >> >> >>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>> >>>> **Not necessarily. >>> >>> True, >> >> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one >> of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding >> my breath. >> >> > Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you > provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live > with a single theoretical exception. > > I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have > sold out for money, fame, employment etc. and purposely lie and distort > facts for their handlers even though they know better. Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know some of them? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-01 00:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <p9pruk$65b$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #679363 |
On 4/1/2018 12:46 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:56:54 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 3/31/2018 8:08 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 1/04/2018 9:46 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2018 5:30 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>> On 31/03/2018 2:53 AM, benj wrote: >>>>>> On 3/30/2018 1:40 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! >>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 13:56:15 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> why believe that outragous full of numbnuts shit article link >>>>>>>> kensi pupa posted? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If it's so "outragous[sic]" and impossible to believe, why do you >>>>>>> froth so? Obviously, you fear kensi's message, which puts the lie >>>>>>> to your k'lame that it's too silly to be believed. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Telling you that you are an uneducated immature clown is hardly >>>>>> froth. It is simply fact and is strong evidence that your beliefs >>>>>> are are all nonsense. Your froth above shows you and "kensi" fear >>>>>> exposure of you lack of science knowledge and try to cover the fact >>>>>> with bluster. Nobody is fooled. Have a nice day. >>>>> >>>>> **Pot, kettle, black you moron. >>>> >>>> Liberal "science": puerile name-calling. >>> >>> **Name calling? Nope. Just stating fact. You fail miserably to back any >>> of your insane claims. You fail miserably to answer any of my questions >>> and you fail miserably to respond to any of my points. You are a lying >>> moron. >>> >>> >>>>>> Big hint, Nads: Journalists are NOT scientists and know no science. >>>>> >>>>> **Not necessarily. >>>> >>>> True, >>> >>> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it? You finally admitted to one >>> of your many lies. one down, about a million to go. I won't be holding >>> my breath. >>> >>> >> Lib liars always accuse others of being the liars. I note that you >> provide no evidence of any journalist knowing any science. I can live >> with a single theoretical exception. >> >> I accept the truth that there ARE scientists who know science who have >> sold out for money, fame, employment etc. and purposely lie and distort >> facts for their handlers even though they know better. > > Yep; a lot of them work for the big oil companies. Perhaps you even know > some of them? > prove it, Nads pupa, http://www.populartechnology.net/2011/05/are-skeptical-scientists-funded-by.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web