Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #508928 > unrolled thread

Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 11:20 -0700
    Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:23 +0000
      Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 18:44 -0600
        Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 00:49 +0000
          Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 19:30 -0600
            Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 01:47 +0000
              Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 20:09 -0600
                Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2015-07-23 22:39 -0400
                Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-07-24 03:15 +0000
              Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-24 07:49 -0400

#508928 — Re: Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought

On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 7:17:03 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought
> > http://phys.org/news/2015-07-greenland-undercut-glaciers-faster-thought.html

  Yes, and?

  As YOU already posted, the melting is due to magma close to the surface.

  Do you propose we try to move the magma deeper?


  Mark L. Fergerson

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#509021

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/23/15 4:06 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/23/15 12:20 PM, nuny@bid.nes wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 7:17:03 PM UTC-7, Sam Wormley wrote:
>>>>> Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought
>>>>>> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-greenland-undercut-glaciers-faster-thought.html
>>>>
>>>>     Yes, and?
>>>>
>>>>     As YOU already posted, the melting is due to magma close to the surface.
>>>>
>>>>     Do you propose we try to move the magma deeper?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     Mark L. Fergerson
>>>>
>>>
>>>     Magma contribution are at under Antarctica.
>>
>> Try again in English professor ass hole.
>>
>>
> 
>   Nevertheless jimp, the science is accurate. Can the jimp refrain
>   from name calling?

What science would that be ass hole?

Are you refering to the arm waving speculation and FUD in your cut and
paste ass hole?

Can an ass hole refrain from cut and pasting off topic speculation and 
FUD to a physics group ass hole?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509026

On 7/23/15 6:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> What science would that be ass hole?

   This paper in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. The jimp
   cannot refrain from name calling.

   Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought
> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-greenland-undercut-glaciers-faster-thought.html

 > Greenland's glaciers flowing into the ocean are grounded deeper below
 > sea level than previously measured, allowing intruding ocean water to
 > badly undercut the glacier faces. That process will raise sea levels
 > around the world much faster than currently estimated, according to a
 > team of researchers led by Eric Rignot of the University of
 > California, Irvine (UCI), and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
 > Pasadena, California.
 >
 > The researchers battled rough waters and an onslaught of icebergs for
 > three summers to map the remote channels below Greenland's
 > marine-terminating glaciers for the first time. Their results have
 > been accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research
 > Letters.



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509038

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/23/15 6:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> What science would that be ass hole?
> 
>   This paper in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. The jimp
>   cannot refrain from name calling.

The source of off topic speculation is irrelevant ass hole.

Can a spamming, cut and paster of off topic, arm waving, speculative
FUD refrain from posting it to a physics group ass hole?


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509054

On 7/23/15 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> The source of off topic speculation is irrelevant ass hole.
>

   The paper is about observations, not speculations, jimp. You
   should try reading for content.

   Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought
> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-greenland-undercut-glaciers-faster-thought.html


 > Greenland's glaciers flowing into the ocean are grounded deeper below
 > sea level than previously measured, allowing intruding ocean water to
 > badly undercut the glacier faces. That process will raise sea levels
 > around the world much faster than currently estimated, according to a
 > team of researchers led by Eric Rignot of the University of
 > California, Irvine (UCI), and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
 > Pasadena, California.
 >
 > The researchers battled rough waters and an onslaught of icebergs for
 > three summers to map the remote channels below Greenland's
 > marine-terminating glaciers for the first time. Their results have
 > been accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research
 > Letters.




-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509078

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/23/15 6:49 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> The source of off topic speculation is irrelevant ass hole.
>>
> 
>   The paper is about observations, not speculations, jimp. You
>   should try reading for content.

The future is not observable ass hole.

You should learn the English language and how grammatical tense works
ass hole.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509081

On 7/23/15 7:47 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> The future is not observable ass hole.

   Try not to be so stooopid, jimp.

   The sun will come up tomorrow, jimp.

   The earth will orbit the sun in another 365.25 days or so, jimp.

   The entropy of the universe will be greater tomorrow than today.

   The earth will be warmer next year than this, jimp.

   Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought
> http://phys.org/news/2015-07-greenland-undercut-glaciers-faster-thought.html

 > Greenland's glaciers flowing into the ocean are grounded deeper below
 > sea level than previously measured, allowing intruding ocean water to
 > badly undercut the glacier faces. That process will raise sea levels
 > around the world much faster than currently estimated, according to a
 > team of researchers led by Eric Rignot of the University of
 > California, Irvine (UCI), and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
 > Pasadena, California.
 >
 > The researchers battled rough waters and an onslaught of icebergs for
 > three summers to map the remote channels below Greenland's
 > marine-terminating glaciers for the first time. Their results have
 > been accepted for publication in the journal Geophysical Research
 > Letters.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509091

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:09:26 -0600, Sam Wormley wrote:

>On 7/23/15 7:47 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> The future is not observable ass hole.
>
>   Try not to be so stooopid, jimp.
>
>   The sun will come up tomorrow, jimp.

Up from where?


>   The earth will orbit the sun in another 365.25 days or so, jimp.
>
>   The entropy of the universe will be greater tomorrow than today.
>
>   The earth will be warmer next year than this, jimp.

You have no certainty that the universe won't collapse tonight.

Then all your speculation would be false.


>   Greenland's undercut glaciers melting faster than thought

IOW: It's worse than we thought.

How many more times is ***the*** consensus say this about their
"settled" science?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509100

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/23/15 7:47 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> The future is not observable ass hole.
 
>   The earth will be warmer next year than this, jimp.

Pure speculation ass hole.

<snip yet another repaste of the same off topic shit>

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#509147

On 7/23/2015 9:47 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>
> The future is not observable ass hole.


According to BJ, it is.


-- 
Cut off one head, two more shall take its place.
HAIL HYDRA!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcG5UOY224

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web