Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #511548 > unrolled thread
| Started by | HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 56 participants
Thread has 1118 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1118 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 09:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-06 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-06 16:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-07 06:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-07 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 00:38 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 06:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 04:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 08:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 05:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 09:42 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 15:42 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 10:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 11:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 12:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 11:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 12:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 20:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 13:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-08 20:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:39 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 07:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-08 16:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 05:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 09:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 11:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 08:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 00:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 01:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:11 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 23:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 01:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 06:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 07:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:32 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 10:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 13:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 18:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 14:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 20:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 15:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 21:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2015-08-15 16:11 -0600
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (laughing at Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 14:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Jeanne Douglas <hlwdjsd2@NOSPAMgmail.com> - 2015-08-09 22:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mattb. <trdell1234@outlook.com> - 2015-08-09 22:35 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 02:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "4-3-Methyl-2-3-Hydroxy-1-Furaldehyde-Menth4-Diethyl-3-Citric-Acid" <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 08:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em 2-Methyl-2-Chlorobutyl-Methylphenol-CinnamylN1-Methylbutyrate <distracted.blonde.ammunition-whore@alt.comedy.thin-lingerie-lass> - 2015-08-10 09:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "grizzled laggard" <degenerate.haddock.pasty@unsatisfactory.kookooyumyumpoon> - 2015-08-13 01:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 04:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "broken down loafer" <indelicate.meat.napkin@tender.biff> - 2015-08-13 10:07 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 18:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 17:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:34 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:00 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:00 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 08:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 09:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 11:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 16:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 14:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 17:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 15:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-12 20:44 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:38 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 15:57 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 08:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 00:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:49 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:06 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 17:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 17:09 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "W.TS." <m14m@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-14 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 10:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 07:44 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 11:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 09:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:20 -0400
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 06:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-15 06:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 09:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 12:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 07:21 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:50 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 07:12 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 10:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 20:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:04 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 19:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (proving Jim is a liar) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Khepernefru II" <gimpy.cock.squeezer@rattle.boned.hoo-hoo> - 2015-08-17 00:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:24 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:35 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % ignoring issues) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 07:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 11:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:23 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Suri Cruz) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 19:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 03:34 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 22:08 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Halstead Lippergold-onnerhall" <holy@mackerel.orgy> - 2015-08-16 13:54 +0800
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:51 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-16 06:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Surviving the Halstead shit storm) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-16 06:51 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:16 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:45 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 15:19 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 17:18 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah now %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 00:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Jim's meltdown) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 04:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 20:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:31 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2015-08-17 16:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-17 12:06 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 19:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV's avoidance of the facts) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Question for FNV "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:37 -0500
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:42 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 20:00 -0400
Re: Question for FNV "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Question for FNV Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 06:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:14 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (re: absolutely entertaining!) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:27 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:30 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 18:32 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 20:54 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 23:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 03:42 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 06:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:16 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Pentagon ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-17 23:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 02:50 +0200
Dook Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-18 03:43 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:26 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-18 16:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "Dr. Morpheus" <d.morpheus@debunkers.ie> - 2015-08-18 19:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Link 4 %) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Siri Cruz bs #2) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:57 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 10:20 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 13:23 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 19:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:11 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 14:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 18:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Michael Moroney is mess up ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 23:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( FNV helps prove an NCD ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:51 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needs help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:04 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV needsa lot of help ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 05:13 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 20:49 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:42 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 19:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:23 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 19:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 23:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 02:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Kadaitcha Man <anon@anon.anon> - 2015-08-17 17:34 +0800
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:02 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.games.video.crossdressing> - 2015-08-18 20:50 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:56 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 10:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:22 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah shotgun ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:20 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 14:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 21:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:12 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 20:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:13 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( jim falls for a big lie ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:10 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 07:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 08:59 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:48 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:04 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-19 17:46 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:09 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Joe Cooper <dragon40@removeunseen.is> - 2015-08-20 22:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-20 22:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:19 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Margarita Cibulkova <margac@terraspace.au> - 2015-08-25 15:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 05:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-22 16:21 +0000
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:52 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 07:00 -0400
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:53 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-22 04:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 14:36 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 09:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-22 17:19 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 12:51 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:57 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 03:54 -0500
Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 12:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:23 +0000
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:00 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 15:58 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 16:33 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:07 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:48 +0100
Re: Topaz terrorist je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-24 16:11 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:17 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-25 14:39 -0400
Re: Topaz terrorist Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 05:36 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 10:21 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 17:02 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 15:48 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's & Jim's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-27 21:15 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 06:05 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:27 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:50 +0000
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-29 03:44 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 04:43 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:08 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:18 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-29 14:37 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:54 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:45 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:17 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:40 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:15 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:05 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-30 03:19 -0700
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:12 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:50 -0700
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 01:57 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:51 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:46 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:25 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:17 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:29 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-03 15:48 -0700
Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-03 22:42 +0000
Re: Re: Rocky still jobless and crazy as a loon Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:23 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 05:59 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Why GZ was called GZ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-04 16:22 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:26 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:03 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 03:58 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Thanks Topaz) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:54 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:14 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 12:40 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:32 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 05:05 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-02 06:37 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-02 18:50 -0400
Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 06:00 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-03 16:36 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-04 08:00 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-04 16:29 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 07:19 +0200
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-05 06:05 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 19:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-05 21:53 +0200
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:53 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-30 05:20 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 08:47 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:38 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:54 -0500
shinola t.m noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 14:58 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-01 17:28 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:39 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:52 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:07 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (quick list) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 16:53 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:56 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-01 16:52 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist (Friendly Neiborhood Nut's BS, BS and BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 16:57 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-25 17:33 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:01 -0500
Re: Topaz terrorist gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Re: Topaz terrorist (was: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 20:18 -0500
Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-19 19:36 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-20 16:11 -0500
No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:42 -0500
Re: No Holograms (was: Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-23 09:30 -0500
Re: No Holograms jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:51 +0000
Re: Re: No Holograms Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-25 09:07 -0400
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-25 16:37 +0000
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 13:37 -0400
Re: Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:07 -0500
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-26 03:23 +0200
Re: No Holograms 9/11 ? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-25 21:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-19 11:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 19:22 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 20:39 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-19 19:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@alt.support.just.venting> - 2015-08-21 10:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-20 08:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-20 19:10 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-20 20:55 -0500
2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 06:31 -0500
Re: 2 Rick (was: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % )) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-23 07:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( asking % for a % ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:37 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 07:02 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-26 13:18 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-26 15:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 12:00 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-27 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 20:36 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 01:16 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 08:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 14:25 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:10 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 09:33 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-29 19:31 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 05:40 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-08-29 01:29 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 17:17 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 22:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-28 20:13 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 19:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 18:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 22:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 17:52 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 04:20 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-27 18:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-27 19:47 -0400
Re: Nuke Em ( Last Sarah post from 8-17-15 @ 8:37 PM ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 20:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Sarah + rads ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:45 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 05:37 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 21:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:19 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:48 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:59 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:02 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:22 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:28 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 22:03 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 19:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 01:04 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 07:09 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:17 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-17 23:17 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 23:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:06 +0000
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 18:29 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 18:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 06:59 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-19 16:38 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 04:07 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-19 18:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 18:05 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-18 09:00 +0100
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em ( Jim's bullshit ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 12:09 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (Once you eliminate the impossible) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-18 05:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 16:35 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 21:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 20:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 22:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-16 23:11 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 22:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:24 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 09:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:27 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah + s ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:44 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 19:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:19 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:05 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 15:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 21:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah + sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 03:00 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (FNV & sarah) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.arts.books.chronic.constipation> - 2015-08-18 11:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 09:01 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 11:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 17:30 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (temper) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (temper) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 17:51 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 17:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-17 21:30 -0400
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-18 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (lost message) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-18 17:08 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 16:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-17 16:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-17 22:57 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:46 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 07:36 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 08:22 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 15:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 14:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 19:36 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 17:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-15 16:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:29 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:31 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 09:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:12 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:47 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 09:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 10:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 12:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:30 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:30 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 11:55 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:58 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving % is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:26 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:24 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:24 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 16:43 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (waiting for Jim to prove one of his statements) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:36 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:24 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:50 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:22 +0100
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:39 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 11:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 23:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:27 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 21:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:11 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:17 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 23:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:40 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:47 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 17:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 17:52 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-12 18:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:46 -0500
NOMINATION: Kook of the Month Re: Nuke Em "Pacesetter" <pace@setter.boss> - 2015-08-13 10:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 08:40 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 10:03 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 10:27 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 13:17 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:06 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 19:12 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:01 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:21 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 15:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 17:29 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 00:48 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 23:10 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-15 00:44 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:53 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:53 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@rec.humour.funny.why.breathing.is.good.for.you> - 2015-08-16 03:23 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 06:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Quukur the inventive lizard-quaverer" <bat-fowling.credulous.fool@flapping.bacilliform.hasty.flirt-gill> - 2015-08-15 13:00 +0800
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 22:05 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:47 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Netjershema IV" <scorched.beaver@ripe.mommy.button> - 2015-08-16 23:41 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@soc.religion.prostatitis.worried.dude> - 2015-08-17 03:02 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 07:42 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 05:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 18:18 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 15:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Sekhemamun II Ankhet" <enfeebled.shutters.of.love@bulging.hairy.cherry> - 2015-08-16 23:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:16 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 19:40 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 00:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 06:03 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:54 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 10:31 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 17:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 12:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 13:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 04:16 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-17 05:46 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 22:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-14 20:01 -0700
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:24 +0200
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:29 +0000
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 09:21 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-15 18:43 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 09:18 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 07:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:06 +0100
Re: Nuke Em + the Miracle of stairwell B (full documentary) BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-16 12:08 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 09:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 07:50 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:03 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:15 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 14:39 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 16:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 18:46 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 18:38 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:16 -0500
PING > FNVW "Amun-erisy-merwyitu" <droopy.bizzle@strong.muffy> - 2015-08-16 01:33 +0000
Re: PING > FNVW "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 18:43 -0700
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-13 16:02 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 09:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:12 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 15:55 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:25 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Mitchell Holman <noemail@att.net> - 2015-08-14 20:56 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:12 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 08:07 +0200
Re: Nuke Em john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 23:14 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:34 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 17:38 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 17:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:15 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-14 23:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 04:59 +0200
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-13 22:54 +0000
Re: Nuke Em talishi <talishi@example.net> - 2015-08-14 18:33 -0700
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 02:53 -0400
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-13 09:32 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-13 10:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-14 06:45 +0200
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-14 10:06 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-14 20:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-15 05:35 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:21 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 18:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) second try "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:26 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:28 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:49 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 20:49 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 18:59 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:33 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:53 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 02:32 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:18 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-16 05:47 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-16 08:17 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-16 17:14 +0100
Re: Nuke Em (caught Jim avoiding the #1 issue) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-17 00:01 +0000
Re: Nuke Em (caught % in a big lie) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-16 08:52 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVWE's photo is bogus) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 04:52 +0200
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-15 22:10 -0500
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-15 20:25 -0700
Re: Nuke Em (proving FNVW sis a big LIAR) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-16 06:54 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-12 15:48 +0000
Re: Nuke Em Checkmate <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-12 10:58 -0700
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-10 04:35 -0500
2 Jeanne Douglas (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 08:48 -0500
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 16:53 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-23 12:23 -0700
Proving Hägar is a sack of shit (was: 2 Jeanne Douglas) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:01 -0500
Re: Proving H?gar is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 20:18 +0000
Re: Proving Hägar is a sack of shit Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Re: Proving H㦡r is a sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 02:16 +0200
Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 20:13 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 03:52 +0200
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:20 -0500
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:36 +0000
Re: Proving Rocky is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 06:14 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 08:22 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 06:59 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 09:30 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 08:17 -0700
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 10:26 -0500
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 15:18 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 16:21 +0000
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-24 20:02 +0200
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-24 14:30 -0400
Re: Proving Friendly Neighborhood Nut is an insane sack of shit Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-25 04:51 +0200
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 02:20 +0000
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 21:49 -0500
Re: Proving the Friendly Neighborhood Nut is a sack of shit jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-24 06:12 +0000
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
Re: 2 Jeanne Douglas Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-23 20:28 +0200
Re: Nuke Em Jim Noles <no_e-mails@nosuchserver.com> - 2015-08-23 17:28 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:43 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:41 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:45 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 20:55 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 00:54 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 08:11 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:15 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:57 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:17 +0000
? 4 Jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:25 -0500
Re: ? 4 Jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:58 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-08 20:51 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 03:19 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 06:32 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 13:59 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:21 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:37 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:18 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:40 -0500
? 4 jim (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:14 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 22:43 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:42 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:16 +0000
Re: ? 4 jim "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:01 -0500
Re: ? 4 jim "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:33 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:14 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 17:25 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 14:04 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 19:36 +0000
Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 17:53 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-09 23:21 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 18:46 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 00:17 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 20:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 01:52 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-10 02:43 +0000
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 21:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 15:46 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-10 10:49 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-10 10:27 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 04:39 -0500
Re: Nuke Em BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-08-11 14:45 -0400
Re: Nuke Em "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-12 09:08 -0500
Re: Nuke Em jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-12 16:56 +0000
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500
Re: Nuke Em "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500
Page 50 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 48 49 [50]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 17:53 -0500 |
| Subject | Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) |
| Message-ID | <XrKdnZoPuPCBR1rInZ2dnUU7-LmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512184 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:bnmk9c-r4p.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:41fk9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>>>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook >>>>>>> boi? >>>>>> >>>>>> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the >>>>>> nukes >>>>>> had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme >>>>>> that >>>>>> they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis >>>>>> Tower in >>>>>> Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin >>>>>> Towers >>>>>> used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also >>>>>> cleared >>>>>> out >>>>>> on 9/11/01. >>>>> >>>>>An emergency demolition scheme? >>>>> >>>>>Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any >>>>>civilian building? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect. >>>> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down >>>> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There >>>> aren't any recommendations provided. >>> >>> Right, one just goes to the local Nuke's R Use store and gets three >>> nukes, each of which could take out the entire island, and puts them >>> under the buildings "just in case". >> >> Not right under the buildings but way way under the buildings so they >> have >> as little affect on the surrounding buildings as possible but they still >> could not avoid destroying Fiterman Hall when they vaporized the lower >> floors of WTC7. > > Lunatic fantasy. > > The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that > is obvious from the video. Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin Towers. See: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzrescue1.html The fact is the Twin Towers were partially vaporized from the ground up but the deep underground nuke wasn't big enough to vaporize the entire building so when the top came down it didn't crush the bottom but scattered the vaporized part of the Twin Towers all over the area. And when the top came down it too ended up in the vaporization range of the underground nuke so it was also vaporized before it got to the ground. DUH. >>>> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at >>>> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he >>>> will never do so. >>> >>> Rocky is crazy as a loon. >> >> ROTFLMAO because you think a building collapse can leave surviving walls >> and >> surviving corners at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. <G> > > Lunatic babble. riiight. Then what do you these photos prove? See: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzrescue1.html > Random destruction leaves surviving walls and corners, controlled > demolition > does not, lunatic boy. If you had ever looked at the layout of the "Surviving Corners" or the "Surviving Walls" of the Twin Towers they were not random at all. The surviving parts were the walls and corners furthest from the hypocenters so how can you call them random? Basically the Survivng parts were the North side of the North Tower and the East side of the South Tower and that coninsides with underground nukes planted under WTC3 and WTC4. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 23:21 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512237 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that >> is obvious from the video. > > Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and > Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin Towers. Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi? If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi. <snip insane babble> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 18:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <wKCdnTkpfpz_e1rInZ2dnUU7-XOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512255 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > >>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that >>> is obvious from the video. >> >> Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and >> Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin >> Towers. > > Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi? > > If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been > surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi. Wrong again you idiot. Because the underground nukes were planted so far down in rock they had problems reaching the far side of both the Twin Towers and that is why Surviving Corners and Surviving Walls of both the Twin Towers survived. And the reason those words have to be in caps is because the surviving parts are evidence of deep underground nukes. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 00:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <o57l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512267 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> >>>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that >>>> is obvious from the video. >>> >>> Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and >>> Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin >>> Towers. >> >> Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi? >> >> If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been >> surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi. > > Wrong again you idiot. > > Because the underground nukes were planted so far down in rock they had > problems reaching the far side of both the Twin Towers and that is why > Surviving Corners and Surviving Walls of both the Twin Towers survived. You really are quite insane. > And the reason those words have to be in caps is because the surviving parts > are evidence of deep underground nukes. DUH. You really are quite insane. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 20:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <K6GdnY-c6beTnVXInZ2dnUU7-R2dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512273 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:o57l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> >>>>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that >>>>> is obvious from the video. >>>> >>>> Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and >>>> Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin >>>> Towers. >>> >>> Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi? >>> >>> If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been >>> surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi. >> >> Wrong again you idiot. >> >> Because the underground nukes were planted so far down in rock they had >> problems reaching the far side of both the Twin Towers and that is why >> Surviving Corners and Surviving Walls of both the Twin Towers survived. > > You really are quite insane. And as usual you have no supporting evidence that collapsing buildings will leave outside walls standing and Surviving Corners standing and with very little debris at the base of the standing structures. <G> But deep underground nukes that are in rock instead of dirt can do that. >> And the reason those words have to be in caps is because the surviving >> parts >> are evidence of deep underground nukes. DUH. > > You really are quite insane. And you have nothing at all to support the governments 9/11 bullshit but more bullshit of your own. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 01:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <mocl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512300 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:o57l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>>>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that >>>>>> is obvious from the video. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and >>>>> Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin >>>>> Towers. >>>> >>>> Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>> >>>> If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been >>>> surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi. >>> >>> Wrong again you idiot. >>> >>> Because the underground nukes were planted so far down in rock they had >>> problems reaching the far side of both the Twin Towers and that is why >>> Surviving Corners and Surviving Walls of both the Twin Towers survived. >> >> You really are quite insane. > > And as usual you have no supporting evidence that collapsing buildings will > leave outside walls standing and Surviving Corners standing and with very > little debris at the base of the standing structures. <G> > > But deep underground nukes that are in rock instead of dirt can do that. You really are quite insane. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 21:09 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <tqqdncilU8crmlXInZ2dnUU7-TmdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512305 |
<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message news:mocl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com... > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >> news:o57l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>> news:at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> >>>>>>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that >>>>>>> is obvious from the video. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and >>>>>> Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin >>>>>> Towers. >>>>> >>>>> Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>> >>>>> If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been >>>>> surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi. >>>> >>>> Wrong again you idiot. >>>> >>>> Because the underground nukes were planted so far down in rock they had >>>> problems reaching the far side of both the Twin Towers and that is why >>>> Surviving Corners and Surviving Walls of both the Twin Towers survived. >>> >>> You really are quite insane. >> >> And as usual you have no supporting evidence that collapsing buildings >> will >> leave outside walls standing and Surviving Corners standing and with very >> little debris at the base of the standing structures. <G> >> >> But deep underground nukes that are in rock instead of dirt can do that. > > You really are quite insane. So you really have no way to support the governments official bullshit about the great 9/11 hoax other than to sidetrack. You have no idea how a "Controlled Demolition" would leave the Twin Towers and you know nothing at all about nukes being detonated in solid rock. So what good are you? Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 02:43 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <2nfl9c-6kd.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512306 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:mocl9c-g8d.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:o57l9c-4gc.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>>>>> >>>>>>>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that >>>>>>>> is obvious from the video. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and >>>>>>> Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin >>>>>>> Towers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi? >>>>>> >>>>>> If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been >>>>>> surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi. >>>>> >>>>> Wrong again you idiot. >>>>> >>>>> Because the underground nukes were planted so far down in rock they had >>>>> problems reaching the far side of both the Twin Towers and that is why >>>>> Surviving Corners and Surviving Walls of both the Twin Towers survived. >>>> >>>> You really are quite insane. >>> >>> And as usual you have no supporting evidence that collapsing buildings >>> will >>> leave outside walls standing and Surviving Corners standing and with very >>> little debris at the base of the standing structures. <G> >>> >>> But deep underground nukes that are in rock instead of dirt can do that. >> >> You really are quite insane. > > So you really have no way to support the governments official bullshit about > the great 9/11 hoax other than to sidetrack. You really are quite insane. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 21:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners |
| Message-ID | <qh3gsado4bu3ae81mappsdj80g1aslq7pj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512267 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 18:46:13 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:at3l9c-82c.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>
>>>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that
>>>> is obvious from the video.
>>>
>>> Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and
>>> Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin
>>> Towers.
>>
>> Why are all those words capitalized, lunatic boi?
>>
>> If it had been a contolled demolition, there would not have been
>> surviviing anything, capitalized or not, lunatic boi.
>
>Wrong again you idiot.
>
>Because the underground nukes were planted so far down in rock they had
>problems reaching the far side of both the Twin Towers and that is why
>Surviving Corners and Surviving Walls of both the Twin Towers survived.
>
>And the reason those words have to be in caps is because the surviving parts
>are evidence of deep underground nukes. DUH.
No, they are not. In fact, the PROVE your claim wrong. Sadly, you
honestly are unable to learn this truth.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 21:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Caught Jim in a lie about the Survivng Corners (was: Nuke Em) |
| Message-ID | <df3gsah3j6fvolt5ab4a75bg9aebfilg5s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512237 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:53:51 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:bnmk9c-r4p.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:41fk9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane,
>>>>>>>> but when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook
>>>>>>>> boi?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the
>>>>>>> nukes had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme
>>>>>>> that they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis
>>>>>>> Tower in Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin
>>>>>>> Towers used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also
>>>>>>> cleared out on 9/11/01.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>An emergency demolition scheme?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any
>>>>>>civilian building?
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect.
>>>>> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down
>>>>> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There
>>>>> aren't any recommendations provided.
>>>>
>>>> Right, one just goes to the local Nuke's R Use store and gets three
>>>> nukes, each of which could take out the entire island, and puts them
>>>> under the buildings "just in case".
>>>
>>> Not right under the buildings but way way under the buildings so they
>>> have as little affect on the surrounding buildings as possible but they still
>>> could not avoid destroying Fiterman Hall when they vaporized the lower
>>> floors of WTC7.
>>
>> Lunatic fantasy.
>>
>> The lower floors were crushed by the falling upper floors and that
>> is obvious from the video.
>
>Bullshit and that is proven to be bullshit by the Surviving Walls and
>Surviving Corners in numerous photos of the very bottom of the Twin Towers.
>See:
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzrescue1.html
>
>The fact is the Twin Towers were partially vaporized from the ground up but
>the deep underground nuke wasn't big enough to vaporize the entire building
>so when the top came down it didn't crush the bottom but scattered the
>vaporized part of the Twin Towers all over the area.
>
>And when the top came down it too ended up in the vaporization range of the
>underground nuke so it was also vaporized before it got to the ground. DUH.
>
Except that there was no vaporization range. Because of this,
your lie has failed.
>>>>> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at
>>>>> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he
>>>>> will never do so.
>>>>
>>>> Rocky is crazy as a loon.
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because you think a building collapse can leave surviving walls
>>> and surviving corners at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. <G>
>>
>> Lunatic babble.
>
>riiight. Then what do you these photos prove? See:
>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzrescue1.html
>
That it wasn't a controlled demolition. The surviving corners
PROVE it.
>> Random destruction leaves surviving walls and corners, controlled
>> demolition does not, lunatic boy.
>
>If you had ever looked at the layout of the "Surviving Corners" or the
>"Surviving Walls" of the Twin Towers they were not random at all.
>
>The surviving parts were the walls and corners furthest from the hypocenters
>so how can you call them random? Basically the Survivng parts were the
>North side of the North Tower and the East side of the South Tower and that
>coninsides with underground nukes planted under WTC3 and WTC4.
Since there were no hypocenters, your whole claim fails.
Care to try again?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 15:46 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <svefsahcfptkua2fgf4db1jbegeir5tnle@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512168 |
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 14:04:21 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:41fk9c-t1o.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but
>>>>>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi?
>>>>>
>>>>> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the
>>>>> nukes had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme
>>>>> that they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis
>>>>> Tower in Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin
>>>>> Towers used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also cleared
>>>>> out on 9/11/01.
>>>>
>>>>An emergency demolition scheme?
>>>>
>>>>Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any
>>>>civilian building?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect.
>>> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down
>>> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There
>>> aren't any recommendations provided.
>>
>> Right, one just goes to the local Nuke's R Use store and gets three
>> nukes, each of which could take out the entire island, and puts them
>> under the buildings "just in case".
>
>Not right under the buildings but way way under the buildings so they have
>as little affect on the surrounding buildings as possible but they still
>could not avoid destroying Fiterman Hall when they vaporized the lower
>floors of WTC7.
>
Whereas they were not vaporized, your lie has failed you. Again.
>>> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at
>>> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he
>>> will never do so.
>>
>> Rocky is crazy as a loon.
>
>ROTFLMAO because you think a building collapse can leave surviving walls and
>surviving corners at the very bottom of the Twin Towers. <G>
Not if, as you've claimed, they came down as a result of a
controlled demolition. The corners would have collapsed as well in
such a case.
This is one of the many items that PROVE your claims false.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 10:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.303284054cd97af898c204@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512119 |
In article <lhresa19u5a1hf2fdscsqu5va1k55d8enb@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > > [...] > > >>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but > >>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi? > >> > >> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the nukes > >> had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme that > >> they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis Tower in > >> Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin Towers > >> used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also cleared out > >> on 9/11/01. > > > >An emergency demolition scheme? > > > >Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any > >civilian building? > > > > Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect. > Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down > be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There > aren't any recommendations provided. > Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at > the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he > will never do so. > > >What would the emergency be, an urgent need to build a Starbucks? > > > >You do know that nuclear devices require regular maintenance and > >eventual parts replacements, don't you kook boi? > > Odds are he did and does not. Rocky doesn't know how such devices > actually work. Rocky is either pretending to be really stupid, or he really is stupid. I hope, for his sake, it's pretending. But if it's for real.. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Poor dumb SOB. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-10 10:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3LGdnSU7xpQPX1XInZ2dnUU7-UednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512408 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.303284054cd97af898c204@news.giganews.com... > In article <lhresa19u5a1hf2fdscsqu5va1k55d8enb@4ax.com>, > compuelf@gmail.com says... >> >> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but >> >>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook >> >>> boi? >> >> >> >> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the >> >> nukes >> >> had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme >> >> that >> >> they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis >> >> Tower in >> >> Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin >> >> Towers >> >> used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also cleared >> >> out >> >> on 9/11/01. >> > >> >An emergency demolition scheme? >> > >> >Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any >> >civilian building? >> > >> >> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect. >> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down >> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There >> aren't any recommendations provided. >> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at >> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he >> will never do so. >> >> >What would the emergency be, an urgent need to build a Starbucks? >> > >> >You do know that nuclear devices require regular maintenance and >> >eventual parts replacements, don't you kook boi? >> >> Odds are he did and does not. Rocky doesn't know how such devices >> actually work. > > Rocky is either pretending to be really stupid, or he really is stupid. > > I hope, for his sake, it's pretending. But if it's for real.. > > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Poor dumb SOB. And yet it is you two who can not explain how Fiterman Hall was destroyed or why both of the Twin Towers had "Surviving Corners" where the North Tower even had Survivors above the lobby level. To start with the Twin Towers could not have collapsed all the way down because of where the Survivors were so the only other option is that the Twin Towers floated away before they got to the ground and that is only possible if they were nuked by a deep underground nuke. <G> From my prospective it is the people that can't face all the facts about the Great 9/11 Hoax that are doing themselves a disfavor and are only helping to promote what could be the greatest hoax of all. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 04:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <3mgjsahouo2lcoebrda3n8ogrh1q2pasq3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512416 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:27:14 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>news:MPG.303284054cd97af898c204@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <lhresa19u5a1hf2fdscsqu5va1k55d8enb@4ax.com>,
>> compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> >>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but
>>> >>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook
>>> >>> boi?
>>> >>
>>> >> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the
>>> >> nukes had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme
>>> >> that they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis
>>> >> Tower in Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin
>>> >> Towers used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also cleared
>>> >> out on 9/11/01.
>>> >
>>> >An emergency demolition scheme?
>>> >
>>> >Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any
>>> >civilian building?
>>>
>>> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect.
>>> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down
>>> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There
>>> aren't any recommendations provided.
>>> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at
>>> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he
>>> will never do so.
>>>
>>> >What would the emergency be, an urgent need to build a Starbucks?
>>> >
>>> >You do know that nuclear devices require regular maintenance and
>>> >eventual parts replacements, don't you kook boi?
>>>
>>> Odds are he did and does not. Rocky doesn't know how such devices
>>> actually work.
>>
>> Rocky is either pretending to be really stupid, or he really is stupid.
>>
>> I hope, for his sake, it's pretending. But if it's for real..
>>
>> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Poor dumb SOB.
>
>And yet it is you two who can not explain how Fiterman Hall was destroyed or
>why both of the Twin Towers had "Surviving Corners" where the North Tower
>even had Survivors above the lobby level.
Both of us have explained this MANY times. The unfortunate
reality is that your very real learning disability means you are
unable to accept the truth we've posted.
>To start with the Twin Towers
>could not have collapsed all the way down because of where the Survivors
>were so the only other option is that the Twin Towers floated away before
>they got to the ground and that is only possible if they were nuked by a
>deep underground nuke. <G>
Nope.
>
>From my prospective it is the people that can't face all the facts about the
>Great 9/11 Hoax that are doing themselves a disfavor and are only helping to
>promote what could be the greatest hoax of all.
No one is promoting your nuke claim. And while your claim is a
hoax, to claim it could be the greatest hoax of all reeks of hubris on
your part.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 04:39 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <hlgjsatjblk4ahl26gnbistnj123uia56s@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512408 |
On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:49:26 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com>
wrote:
>In article <lhresa19u5a1hf2fdscsqu5va1k55d8enb@4ax.com>,
>compuelf@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but
>> >>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi?
>> >>
>> >> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the nukes
>> >> had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme that
>> >> they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis Tower in
>> >> Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin Towers
>> >> used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also cleared out
>> >> on 9/11/01.
>> >
>> >An emergency demolition scheme?
>> >
>> >Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any
>> >civilian building?
>>
>> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect.
>> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down
>> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There
>> aren't any recommendations provided.
>> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at
>> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he
>> will never do so.
>>
>> >What would the emergency be, an urgent need to build a Starbucks?
>> >
>> >You do know that nuclear devices require regular maintenance and
>> >eventual parts replacements, don't you kook boi?
>>
>> Odds are he did and does not. Rocky doesn't know how such devices
>> actually work.
>
>Rocky is either pretending to be really stupid, or he really is stupid.
>
I've come to accept that he is unable to learn.
>I hope, for his sake, it's pretending. But if it's for real..
>
>BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Poor dumb SOB.
He's proved, more times than I am willing to count, that he's not
a very smart person.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-11 14:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30340ce1fe60a9af98c219@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512634 |
In article <hlgjsatjblk4ahl26gnbistnj123uia56s@4ax.com>, compuelf@gmail.com says... > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:49:26 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> > wrote: > > >In article <lhresa19u5a1hf2fdscsqu5va1k55d8enb@4ax.com>, > >compuelf@gmail.com says... > >> > >> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> >>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but > >> >>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi? > >> >> > >> >> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the nukes > >> >> had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme that > >> >> they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis Tower in > >> >> Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin Towers > >> >> used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also cleared out > >> >> on 9/11/01. > >> > > >> >An emergency demolition scheme? > >> > > >> >Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any > >> >civilian building? > >> > >> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect. > >> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down > >> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There > >> aren't any recommendations provided. > >> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at > >> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he > >> will never do so. > >> > >> >What would the emergency be, an urgent need to build a Starbucks? > >> > > >> >You do know that nuclear devices require regular maintenance and > >> >eventual parts replacements, don't you kook boi? > >> > >> Odds are he did and does not. Rocky doesn't know how such devices > >> actually work. > > > >Rocky is either pretending to be really stupid, or he really is stupid. > > > > I've come to accept that he is unable to learn. > > >I hope, for his sake, it's pretending. But if it's for real.. > > > >BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Poor dumb SOB. > > He's proved, more times than I am willing to count, that he's not > a very smart person. Like a lot of Troofer types, he seems proud of it. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, and future Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 5 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 09:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <D8ednfijcJCUzlbInZ2dnUU7-T-dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #512777 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.30340ce1fe60a9af98c219@news.giganews.com... > In article <hlgjsatjblk4ahl26gnbistnj123uia56s@4ax.com>, > compuelf@gmail.com says... >> >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:49:26 -0400, BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> >> wrote: >> >> >In article <lhresa19u5a1hf2fdscsqu5va1k55d8enb@4ax.com>, >> >compuelf@gmail.com says... >> >> >> >> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 03:19:52 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> >>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, >> >> >>> but >> >> >>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook >> >> >>> boi? >> >> >> >> >> >> You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the >> >> >> nukes >> >> >> had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition >> >> >> scheme that >> >> >> they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis >> >> >> Tower in >> >> >> Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin >> >> >> Towers >> >> >> used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also >> >> >> cleared out >> >> >> on 9/11/01. >> >> > >> >> >An emergency demolition scheme? >> >> > >> >> >Why on earth would there be an emergency demolition scheme for any >> >> >civilian building? >> >> >> >> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect. >> >> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down >> >> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There >> >> aren't any recommendations provided. >> >> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at >> >> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he >> >> will never do so. >> >> >> >> >What would the emergency be, an urgent need to build a Starbucks? >> >> > >> >> >You do know that nuclear devices require regular maintenance and >> >> >eventual parts replacements, don't you kook boi? >> >> >> >> Odds are he did and does not. Rocky doesn't know how such devices >> >> actually work. >> > >> >Rocky is either pretending to be really stupid, or he really is stupid. >> > >> >> I've come to accept that he is unable to learn. >> >> >I hope, for his sake, it's pretending. But if it's for real.. >> > >> >BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Poor dumb SOB. >> >> He's proved, more times than I am willing to count, that he's not >> a very smart person. > > Like a lot of Troofer types, he seems proud of it. Oh boy I looked into this branch only to find two people that worship their Television Sets and allow it to program them with inconsistent stories. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-12 16:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3eas9c-76p.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #512985 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > Oh boy I looked into this branch only to find two people that worship their > Television Sets and allow it to program them with inconsistent stories. > > Rocky Why is "Television Sets" capitalized, kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-13 04:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <laqnsa5atpvsc22dmpnmbh25gghf7jl4je@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512985 |
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 09:08:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> >> Rocky's claim comes about because of his low intellect.
>>> >> Building codes in NYC do require a means of bring buildings down
>>> >> be listed. There is nothing about what these means must be. There
>>> >> aren't any recommendations provided.
>>> >> Rocky should post the specific means listed for the building at
>>> >> the WTC complex. But since that will further prove his claim wrong, he
>>> >> will never do so.
>>> >>
>>> >> >What would the emergency be, an urgent need to build a Starbucks?
>>> >> >
>>> >> >You do know that nuclear devices require regular maintenance and
>>> >> >eventual parts replacements, don't you kook boi?
>>> >>
>>> >> Odds are he did and does not. Rocky doesn't know how such devices
>>> >> actually work.
>>> >
>>> >Rocky is either pretending to be really stupid, or he really is stupid.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I've come to accept that he is unable to learn.
>>>
>>> >I hope, for his sake, it's pretending. But if it's for real..
>>> >
>>> >BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Poor dumb SOB.
>>>
>>> He's proved, more times than I am willing to count, that he's not
>>> a very smart person.
>>
>> Like a lot of Troofer types, he seems proud of it.
>
>Oh boy I looked into this branch only to find two people that worship their
>Television Sets and allow it to program them with inconsistent stories.
What motivates you to lie so often? This is a serious question.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-09 10:13 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <6hresatj19it3jc6p6hu467cihnj1v78sl@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #512036 |
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 20:51:42 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
><jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>news:gsmi9c-qbp.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>> news:gnki9c-a5p.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:egii9c-rso.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually it was a video from Nuke York City the day after 9/11 that
>>>>>>> clued us
>>>>>>> in that the Twin Towers were really destroyed the safest way we could
>>>>>>> destroy them and that was with deep underground nukes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, and no one would ever notice someone digging the deep hole in
>>>>>> the middle of New York or all the dirt that would have to have been hauled
>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Babbling idiot.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are an absolute idiot because the building code for Nuke York City
>>>>> demands that before tall buildings can be built their also has to be a
>>>>> way to bring them down and nuclear controlled demolitions can be used for
>>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, sure, kook boi.
>>>>
>>>> If nothing else, at least this thread provides a look at the results
>>>> of cutting funding for mental health programs.
>>>
>>> And again you provide no evidence whatsoever to support the government's
>>> official bullshit about 9/11.
>>>
>>> I on the other hand can offer photos that prove the Twin Towers did not
>>> really collapse because if they had collapsed they would have crushed the
>>> "Surviving Corners" at the very bottom of them. They were nuked and most
>>> of them floated away before they ever made it to the ground.
>>
>> I know it is pointless to attempt to get reality from the insane, but
>> when were these "nukes" installed and how is no one noticed, kook boi?
>
>You are an absolute idiot because you can't grasp the fact that the nukes
>had been in place for years as part of an emergency demolition scheme that
>they used on 9/11. The Sears Tower which is now called the Willis Tower in
>Chicago also has an emergency demolition scheme just like the Twin Towers
>used on 9/11. That is why the Sears Tower in Chicago was also cleared out
>on 9/11/01.
>
>Still photos of the "Surviving Corners" of the Twin Towers prove they were
>not crushed from above but nuked from below but not directly below.
> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/gzrescue1.html
>
The pictures PROVE it was NOT a controlled demolition. If there
were a controlled demolition, the corners would have also come down.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 50 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 48 49 [50]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web