Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #521922 > unrolled thread

Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 18:42 -0500
    Re: Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 01:20 +0000
      Re: Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 07:59 -0500
        Re: Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study benj <none@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 13:51 -0400
        Re: Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-19 17:57 +0000
    Re: Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 22:53 -0400
    The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2015-09-19 21:19 +0100

#521922 — Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study

Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html

> A new study reveals that the evidence for a recent pause in the rate
> of global warming lacks a sound statistical basis. The finding
> highlights the importance of using appropriate statistical techniques
> and should improve confidence in climate model projections

> Abstract
>
> The reported “hiatus” in the warming of the global climate system
> during this century has been the subject of intense scientific and
> public debate, with implications ranging from scientific
> understanding of the global climate sensitivity to the rate in which
> greenhouse gas emissions would need to be curbed in order to meet the
> United Nations global warming target. A number of scientific
> hypotheses have been put forward to explain the hiatus, including
> both physical climate processes and data artifacts. However, despite
> the intense focus on the hiatus in both the scientific and public
> arenas, rigorous statistical assessment of the uniqueness of the
> recent temperature time-series within the context of the long-term
> record has been limited. We apply a rigorous, comprehensive
> statistical analysis of global temperature data that goes beyond
> simple linear models to account for temporal dependence and selection
> effects. We use this framework to test whether the recent period has
> demonstrated i) a hiatus in the trend in global temperatures, ii) a
> temperature trend that is statistically distinct from trends prior to
> the hiatus period, iii) a “stalling” of the global mean temperature,
> and iv) a change in the distribution of the year-to-year temperature
> increases. We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a
> “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis. Our analysis
> reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean
> temperature, no statistically significant difference in trends, no
> stalling of the global mean temperature, and no change in
> year-to-year temperature increases.
>
> Citation
>
> Debunking the climate hiatus by Bala Rajaratnam, Joseph Romano,
> Michael Tsiang and Noah S. Diffenbaugh published in Climatic Change
> doi:10.​1007/​s10584-015-1495-y
>


   Looking like naysayers, politicians and the jimp made it all up!


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#521932

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study

If there is a "study" it must be true and everyone should just ignore
what all those silly thermometers say, right shit head?

-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521988

On 9/18/15 8:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> If there is a "study" it must be true and everyone should just ignore
> what all those silly thermometers say, right shit head?

   Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp.


   Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html

 > A new study reveals that the evidence for a recent pause in the rate
 > of global warming lacks a sound statistical basis. The finding
 > highlights the importance of using appropriate statistical techniques
 > and should improve confidence in climate model projections

 > Abstract
 >
 > The reported “hiatus” in the warming of the global climate system
 > during this century has been the subject of intense scientific and
 > public debate, with implications ranging from scientific
 > understanding of the global climate sensitivity to the rate in which
 > greenhouse gas emissions would need to be curbed in order to meet the
 > United Nations global warming target. A number of scientific
 > hypotheses have been put forward to explain the hiatus, including
 > both physical climate processes and data artifacts. However, despite
 > the intense focus on the hiatus in both the scientific and public
 > arenas, rigorous statistical assessment of the uniqueness of the
 > recent temperature time-series within the context of the long-term
 > record has been limited. We apply a rigorous, comprehensive
 > statistical analysis of global temperature data that goes beyond
 > simple linear models to account for temporal dependence and selection
 > effects. We use this framework to test whether the recent period has
 > demonstrated i) a hiatus in the trend in global temperatures, ii) a
 > temperature trend that is statistically distinct from trends prior to
 > the hiatus period, iii) a “stalling” of the global mean temperature,
 > and iv) a change in the distribution of the year-to-year temperature
 > increases. We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a
 > “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis. Our analysis
 > reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean
 > temperature, no statistically significant difference in trends, no
 > stalling of the global mean temperature, and no change in
 > year-to-year temperature increases.
 >
 > Citation
 >
 > Debunking the climate hiatus by Bala Rajaratnam, Joseph Romano,
 > Michael Tsiang and Noah S. Diffenbaugh published in Climatic Change
 > doi:10.​1007/​s10584-015-1495-y
 >



-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522046

On 09/19/2015 08:59 AM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> On 9/18/15 8:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> If there is a "study" it must be true and everyone should just ignore
>> what all those silly thermometers say, right shit head?
>
>    Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp.
>
>
>    Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
>> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html

Total Temperature rise 0.005 Degree per year as Measured by Dr. Hansen 
the "Godfather of global warming"!

Try not to be such a dishonest liar, Asshat.

Is dishonesty a qualification for a teaching job in Iowa the way 
immorality is in HVAC's neck of the woods?

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522051

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/18/15 8:20 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> If there is a "study" it must be true and everyone should just ignore
>> what all those silly thermometers say, right shit head?
> 
>   Try not to be so stoooopid, jimp.

Fuck off and die, spamming shit head.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#521936

On 09/18/2015 07:42 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Global Warming 'Hiatus' Never Happened Says Study
>> http://www.reportingclimatescience.com/news-stories/article/global-warming-hiatus-never-happened-says-study.html
>>
>
>> A new study reveals that the evidence for a recent pause in the rate
>> of global warming lacks a sound statistical basis. The finding
>> highlights the importance of using appropriate statistical techniques
>> and should improve confidence in climate model projections
>
>> Abstract
>>
>> The reported “hiatus” in the warming of the global climate system
>> during this century has been the subject of intense scientific and
>> public debate, with implications ranging from scientific
>> understanding of the global climate sensitivity to the rate in which
>> greenhouse gas emissions would need to be curbed in order to meet the
>> United Nations global warming target. A number of scientific
>> hypotheses have been put forward to explain the hiatus, including
>> both physical climate processes and data artifacts. However, despite
>> the intense focus on the hiatus in both the scientific and public
>> arenas, rigorous statistical assessment of the uniqueness of the
>> recent temperature time-series within the context of the long-term
>> record has been limited. We apply a rigorous, comprehensive
>> statistical analysis of global temperature data that goes beyond
>> simple linear models to account for temporal dependence and selection
>> effects. We use this framework to test whether the recent period has
>> demonstrated i) a hiatus in the trend in global temperatures, ii) a
>> temperature trend that is statistically distinct from trends prior to
>> the hiatus period, iii) a “stalling” of the global mean temperature,
>> and iv) a change in the distribution of the year-to-year temperature
>> increases. We find compelling evidence that recent claims of a
>> “hiatus” in global warming lack sound scientific basis. Our analysis
>> reveals that there is no hiatus in the increase in the global mean
>> temperature, no statistically significant difference in trends, no
>> stalling of the global mean temperature, and no change in
>> year-to-year temperature increases.
>>
>> Citation
>>
>> Debunking the climate hiatus by Bala Rajaratnam, Joseph Romano,
>> Michael Tsiang and Noah S. Diffenbaugh published in Climatic Change
>> doi:10.​1007/​s10584-015-1495-y
>>
>
>
>    Looking like naysayers, politicians and the jimp made it all up!

Well, let's go to the authority, Sammy. The Godfather of Global Warming 
and his "improved" temperature measurements that are taken to prove him 
right! I'm talking of course of Dr. Hansen and his GISS climate 
measurements. Well, here is your Proof of warming:

http://www.mrk-inc.com/users/bspam/AGWGISS2014.gif

As anyone can plainly see "deniers" are lying again. There is no 
"hiatus". Global warming has continued to "careen" dramatically out of 
control as temperatures have soared a whopping 0.005 degree per year 
during the so-called "hiatus" period. Clearly "global warming" is still 
going on!  Nobody can deny it!

And while we are at it why don't we check on Dr. Hansen's climate 
predictions and those of the other "scientific consensus" of the IPCC?

Here they are:

https://nofrakkingconsensus.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/hayden_ipcc_arrow.jpg

As you can clearly see. As predictions deviate further and further from 
actual temperatures, IPCC reports go from "confident" to Extremely 
likely >95%.  Even more important if one carefully examines the actual 
measured temperatures one can clearly see the 0.005 degree "global 
Warming" that never went away.

Face it folks. The Hiatus is horseshit! Global WArming is REAL. You MUST 
fork over that trillion dollar energy tax to the Third world or be 
locked up as a "denier".

It's a simple as that.

Your checks can be made out to Sam Wormley, Iowa, USA.

-- 
         ___           ___           ___            ___
        /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
       /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
      /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
     /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
    /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
    \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
     \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
      \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
       \_:/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
                      \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#522083 — The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming

Sam Wormley wrote:

> Global Warming 'Hiatus'


Mindless illiterate moron Sam the Worm doesn't know any basic science.

The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming

Those that thought they found some relation had all retracted it after finding out
the relation is logarithmic againt their hallucinations.

NO SCIENTIST EXISTS TODAY THAT LINKS CO2 TO GLOW BULL WUMMING.

Seriously in all seriousness glu bull wummed trolls are seriously
constipated when it comes to explaining the insignificance of
trace gas 0.04% CO2.

97% of scientists agree there is no climate change, just climate fluctuations
because the climate and weather fluctuates all the time.
But importantly more than 50% agree these temperature drifts are not human induced.

All scientists 100% agree there is no historical correlation between Earth's temperature
and 0.04% trace gas CO2.

So why don't you accept the majority verdict of real scientists?

Here they are in glorious form:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAW7EgVHrDk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCrkqLaYjnc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SOjyMir6Z0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiPIvH49X-E
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQpyAY3J55g

Glow bull wummies using 4 thermometers in the antartic and claims it proves 
fluctuation of +/-0.1 degree noise as evidence of glu bull wumming.
(For reference the earth warms 1 degree per hour during the day
and cools 1 degree per hour during the night and measurement is riddled
with noise.)

Glue bull wummies put more and more thermometers in industrialized North Amerikkka to 
boost glu bull wumming average ratings. Thats like putting more and more thermometers
near a fire to boost the average and make the fake claim "its getting hotter" everywhere!!
Many other countries also on the same unstoppable fiddling train wreck.

Glu bull wummies haven't taken average of land temperature (which is prone to
steam rising from the ground) and 1km up where the air has mixed, to get
average temperature. As more cities and roads are built, all they are measuring
is surface temperature of built up areas and heat islands.
Many other countries also on the same unstoppable data fiddling train wreck.

Glu bull wummies haven't taken average of trace gas 0.04% CO2 at ground level
(which is prone to plant respiration from new farms, build up in valleys because
it is heavier than air, and to forests which respire lots of CO2 for the entire
night) and 1km up where the air has mixed, to get a true estimate of the CO2 level away
from built up areas and CO2 natural concentrating effects.
Many other countries also on the same unstoppable data fiddling train wreck.

Any politician engaged in talking up glu bull wumming don't know the numbers
are is firmly engaged in fraud.


The effect of 0.04% trace gas CO2 is exactly less than 0.04% on glow bull wumming
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All reports by ALL scientists AGREE the effect of 0.04% CO2 trace gas is 
exactly less than 0.04% of glow bull wumming.

Because the air is 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen and all the rest 1% which 
includes trace gas CO2 which comprise 0.04% of all the gases.

All reports by ALL scientists AGREE the effect of 0.04% CO2 trace gas is 
exactly less than 0.04% after including all known sources of "radiative forcing" by 
all gases because ALL atmospheric gases are transparent.

All scientists agree there is no historical correlation between Earth's temperature
and 0.04% trace gas CO2.

--

The IPCC is not a scientific organisation but a political
con group. Its made up of a bunch of pseudo scientists with a lot of huffed
and puffed opinions that they dare not publish
under peer review and who have never published
an IPCC peer reviewed paper between them.
All the literature is worth the toilet paper it is written in.

Any libraries or organisations paying for IPCC reports are
paying good money for toilet paper and should be made accountable.

Any governments using IPCC services or buying into 
state of California officials employed as glow ball wamming trolls
handing out advise for money are firmly engaged in political fraud.

Glow ball wamming Key
---------------------

"Climate change" is a political statement - not a scientific statement.
Climate hasn't changed in 10,000 years.

"Global warming" is a political statement - not a scientific statement.

"Denier" is a political hate statement - not a scientific statement.

"IPCC" is an institution propagating political fraud.

"State of California" is a US institution propagating political climate 
fraud.

"NOAA" is a political fraud entity without records of how policy was made.
The greenhouse gas diagrams produced by NOAA are depicting fake and
a fraud commited against the public.

"NSA" is a state actor furthering global wamming politics through
      specfic documented interception of communications with the specific
      aim of defeating anyone who opposes the hallucigenated output
      of the glow ball wamming trolling movement. So says wikileaks.

"radiative forcing" is a politican term used by illiterates - not a 
scientific term. The amount is so miniscule, for trace gas 0.04%, the effect on glow
bull wamming is exactly less than 0.04% and not worth the mention.

"greenhouse gas" is a poltical statement - not a scientific statement

"greenhouse gas emissions" is a poltical statement - not a scientific 
statement.

There are no greenhouse gases on planet Earth worth talking about.

Politicians using terms such as greenhouse gas and greenhouse gas
emissions are engaged in fraud. 


1. Glow ball wammies including the Pope who has never published a peer
   reviewed papwer NEVER KNEW which is the biggest greenhouse gas
   on planet Earth. The 0.04% of trace gas CO2 is adds nothing of importance 
   to glow ball wamming. It contributes exactly less than 0.04% of
   the earth's temperature.
   
   Because almost all the air is 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen
   and all the rest 1%.
   
   The heat is actually carried by water vapour which is not
   labelled as a gas because it doesn't stick around in the
   atmosphere in the same way as atmospheric gases.
   Look out into the sky and see all those clouds?
   That is condensing steam.
   Imagine how many millions of kettles need to be boiled
   to put all that steam into the air. That energy is provided
   by the sun heating up sea water. Two thirds of the planet
   is sea water receiving more than 1kW of energy per square
   meter during daylight to vaporize the water.
   Same with land which can put up water vapour if the land
   is not seriously dry.
   
   EVERYONE caught up in glow ball wamming camp don't know the facts.
   Stop any greenpeace activist or a glow ball wammied
   politician, and NOT ONE person will know the above numbers
   because they are gold fish easily preyed on with carefully
   crafted dumbo words by greedy corporatons that stand to
   benefit ranting their mumbo jumbo they have taught themselves to say.
   

2. The 10 beeellliooonnn tons of CO2 emitted per year 
   can grow at best 75 x 75 miles square of forest.
   Take account what is below the ground as well,
   then may only 50 x 50 miles square of forest.
   
   So the last 100 years of CO2 emissions is not enough
   to grow 750 x 750 miles square forest.
   
   These numbers are staggeringly small.
   
   The founder of greenpeace says plant more trees and
   use more trees.

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCrkqLaYjnc - Dr Patrick Moore

   His message however has been hijacked by trolls inside
   greenpeace who portray man as some kind of enemy of mother
   nature instead of following the ideals of green living
   which is to live sustainably in harmony with nature.
   

3. The energy trolls are working closely with glow ball wammies
   to hike energy prices.
   
   The robber barrons of yesterday have latched onto to fuel as
   the new vehicle of robbing the poor
   because it is essential for living and now they have power
   to meter and dish it out in smaller portions and charge highest
   possible rates, because no one can refuse hiked energy prices.
   
   This makes energy trolls the no.1 public enemy of global
   peace.
   
4. Energy trolls want to hike up solar prices in USA and
   are trying to spread their disease to EU and rest of the
   world through bribery and state actors.
   
   Energy trolls and enery trolling politician
   in USA have pushed through anti-green laws
   to tax the poor that fit solar panels.

   You now owe power companies money if you fit solar panels to roof tops.
   Thats like owing ham burger companies $10 a month for the priviledge
   of being able to buy a hamburger in your street because they
   got set up costs even if you make your own hamburgers.

   You also owe power companies for fossil fuel carbon tax.

   So you owe money to these crocporations
   no matter which way you leap, and no matter what right
   things you try to do.

   The trolling polticians are stupid enough to fall for it
   and tax the poor for using coal power and
   tax them again for NOT using coal power with carbon tax. DOH!!!!
   America is stupid. American politician is stupid.
   And there is nothing Americans do to repair it while
   those politicians and energy trolls are in charge.

   It doesn't end there.
   For years the energy trolling crocporations in USA have
   campaigned to stop solar fencing erected. Solar panels
   are now cheaper than the man power needed to put them up.
   So they also hike solar panel prices by trolling politician
   to impose duties and tarrif hikes.
   The US and EU polticians are stupid enough to fall for it
   again and imposed duties to tax the poor even further and
   put up greater barriers illegally 50% higher
   to keep them from their solar panels while market prices
   are below $28 per sq meter.  DOH!!!!!!!!!!!!
   These stupid politicians drunk on tax payer money
   need to be criminalised for taking energy trolling crocporation
   lobby money and need to be replaced.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web