Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #603052 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-10-31 00:41 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-11-26 10:26 -0600 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 364 — 23 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 00:41 -0700
The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 02:43 -0700
The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 07:22 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:13 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 08:28 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 17:01 +0100
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:08 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:25 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 03:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 03:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 04:49 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Earle Jones27 <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2016-11-02 11:14 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 11:36 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:10 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-02 12:25 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 14:29 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 10:21 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-03 12:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 21:32 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:36 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 08:48 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 07:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 18:09 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 15:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:32 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 16:05 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-07 19:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:45 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 04:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 15:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 20:00 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-06 13:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 16:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 02:11 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-06 22:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-07 15:30 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:07 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-07 10:10 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 10:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:46 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-03 11:24 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 23:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 08:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-08 17:24 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-09 00:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:05 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 08:29 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:50 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 13:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 00:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 07:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 00:39 -0800
The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 10:14 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-10-31 11:19 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2016-10-31 11:44 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-31 14:09 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 05:47 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-10-31 11:58 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 12:25 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 14:57 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 15:34 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:49 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-01 16:33 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 19:44 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:39 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 09:42 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:06 -0400
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 09:00 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 07:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-02 12:08 -0700
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-07 12:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-08 11:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-08 12:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-08 16:24 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-11-10 14:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-10 18:42 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-10 17:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 05:25 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 08:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:51 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:49 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 04:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 05:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 07:12 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:01 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 10:31 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-13 11:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 04:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 05:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 06:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:34 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 09:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:27 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 06:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 07:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:49 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:47 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:58 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:00 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 19:02 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast sdf <sdf@sdf.sdf> - 2016-11-17 20:48 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 16:45 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:05 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:37 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:32 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 18:22 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:30 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 11:34 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-16 09:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 11:52 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-17 01:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-17 09:58 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 00:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-19 07:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 19:10 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:56 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-15 02:17 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:55 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 17:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:39 -0500
trons go keplerian; that is hwat the four quantum numbers are noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 19:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:49 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 03:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 04:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 09:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-15 10:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:03 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 12:17 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:40 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:33 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 17:22 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-15 19:37 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-15 21:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 04:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 07:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 08:39 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 15:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:03 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:51 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:33 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 16:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-16 08:52 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:53 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:07 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 16:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-16 18:28 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-16 17:02 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 17:46 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-11-18 17:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-19 18:19 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "Amazing Distilled Wolverine" <lol_ima_fgt@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 14:00 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:42 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-14 18:40 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 15:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 18:10 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 20:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-12 14:48 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 16:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:37 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:29 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 07:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:58 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 08:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:35 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-14 11:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 12:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Alan Folmsbee <omnilobe@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 10:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 11:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-15 08:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:04 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 07:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 09:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-12 08:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 07:35 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-12 19:55 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-11 11:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-11 14:04 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 12:09 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-20 13:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-20 14:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 07:54 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:25 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 06:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 08:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-21 16:44 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:33 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "F.Art.Ingatu" <F.Art.Ingatu@hotmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:48 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 10:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 12:31 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:57 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 13:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 07:17 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 05:59 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 17:20 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 09:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:50 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-22 17:52 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 18:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:11 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 04:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 18:35 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 15:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-25 22:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 00:02 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 12:06 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 13:56 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast pnalsing@gmail.com - 2016-11-26 14:13 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 14:49 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-26 15:37 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-01 16:15 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 12:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-06 13:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-06 13:51 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 04:23 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 07:42 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 09:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-12-07 11:01 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 17:17 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-26 23:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 14:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 13:57 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:43 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-24 01:15 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:50 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:07 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:03 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:26 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:35 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:35 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:35 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:14 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:22 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:54 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:08 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:54 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 02:25 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 22:11 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-27 04:05 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:27 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:36 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:36 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:55 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-27 08:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-28 16:44 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 01:38 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-29 23:38 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 01:25 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-30 05:56 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-12-01 12:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-12-01 16:44 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:23 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 20:08 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 11:51 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-22 10:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-22 20:26 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-21 22:18 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 12:19 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 14:02 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:46 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:22 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 07:28 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:32 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 08:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:00 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:14 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 09:21 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:56 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 10:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 11:52 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-23 18:13 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 11:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:20 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:26 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:36 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-23 19:10 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:47 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:47 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:10 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 06:17 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 08:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 09:06 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-24 15:40 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-25 03:17 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:58 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-26 19:57 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 16:39 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-23 14:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-11-24 06:29 +0000
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:41 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-23 22:55 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 09:49 -0600
Re: The electron goes fast HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 11:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast poraty350@gmail.com - 2016-11-22 22:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-11-21 09:54 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-11-21 10:32 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:41 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-18 19:56 -0500
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-18 16:43 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 15:53 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:24 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:26 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:29 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2016-11-19 17:30 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-11-19 20:35 -0800
Re: The electron goes fast Yuri Kreaton <invlaid@invalid.com> - 2016-11-26 10:26 -0600
Page 15 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 19 Next page →
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 05:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <a662hd-9sg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607182 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 8:22 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/29/2016 6:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:03 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 8:15 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/23/2016 7:14 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nov 22john >>>>>>>>>>>>>> benj >>>>>>>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> John is right. You ARE a zombie. " >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> These guys can't decide what structure >>>>>>>>>>>>>> means. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mickey now says if it comes apart >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it HAS structure! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like clouds, Mickey? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> BJ and John are the exact opposite of science. Ghosts, esp, moonmen, these are their areas of 'expertise'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No offense tho guys. Fist bump? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>>>>>>>>> name-calling. Such a sad little man. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is halarious that someone that believes in psychic phenomena uses the >>>>>>>>>>>> word science so much. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> So what subject do you think should be censored out of science? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> None. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Psychic phenomena is not "censored out of science", it has been tested >>>>>>>>>> many times with zero positive results. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is a failed hypothesis. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is YOU who wants to censor it out of science. Data is extensive and at >>>>>>>>> least as good as that for QM. Shall we censor QM too because I say so? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The very phrase "censor it out of science" is kook babble kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As nothing has been "censored out of science", the phrase "Shall we >>>>>>>> censor QM too" is kook babble kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You have ZERO idea what the hell science is or how it works. You know if >>>>>>>>> you could read you could read my book and learn something. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you had a clue what the word "science" actually meant, you would not >>>>>>>> throw it around so glibly particularly when talking about something >>>>>>>> like psychic phenomena kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your religious opinion. Science isn't religion, nutjob. >>>>>> >>>>>> "religious opinion"? >>>>>> >>>>>> What a babbling kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> So where is your peer reviewed positive results from a study of >>>>>> psychic phenomena kook? >>>>> >>>>> There is well over a century of such results, >>>> >>>> Yet you can not point to one peer reviewed study with positive results kook. >>>> >>>> <snip usual ranting diatribe> >>>> >>>> >>> Babbling waste of time. >> >> Yes babbling kooks like you that claim there is a wealth sof support >> for their kook beliefs yet are never able to produce it are a waste >> of time. >> >> > stalker Where is your peer reviewed positive results from a study of psychic phenomena kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-24 06:08 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9fa5ef3c-2c9d-49c6-a636-c2178b8dc039@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606268 |
BJ quacked HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and name-calling. ---------- BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. Chill out bro. Fist bump?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 19:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583a2ebb$0$15587$c3e8da3$9deca2c3@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606328 |
On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked > HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and > name-calling. > ---------- > > BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. > > Chill out bro. Fist bump? > Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an "exciting" story?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 02:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dqspgd-8gh.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606599 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >> BJ quacked >> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >> name-calling. >> ---------- >> >> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >> >> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >> > Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. > How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? > What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing > child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an > "exciting" story? What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-26 22:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583a4ee3$0$40416$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606623 |
On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>> BJ quacked >>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>> name-calling. >>> ---------- >>> >>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>> >>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>> >> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >> "exciting" story? > > What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no > test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? Nothing. It's just your fantasy statement with nothing to back it up. Go ahead. Say it. Those remote viewers are just real good guessers! I see you still are ignoring the quote I gave from the researcher. All we have here is your opinions and even if you actually are an engineer that still means they are worthless. In HVAC's case he doesn't even have that much going for him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 04:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3l2qgd-j5i.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606632 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>> BJ quacked >>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>> name-calling. >>>> ---------- >>>> >>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>> >>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>> >>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>> "exciting" story? >> >> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? > > What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. <snip remaining kook froth> -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 16:27 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583ca16b$0$51784$c3e8da3$f6268168@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606647 |
On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>> BJ quacked >>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>> name-calling. >>>>> ---------- >>>>> >>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>> >>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>> >>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>> "exciting" story? >>> >>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >> >> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? > > Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. > > <snip remaining kook froth> > > So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. You both have no idea what science is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 01:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ql2vgd-o95.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606893 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>> name-calling. >>>>>> ---------- >>>>>> >>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>> >>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>> >>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>>> "exciting" story? >>>> >>>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >>> >>> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? >> >> Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. >> >> <snip remaining kook froth> >> >> > So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two > lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. > > You both have no idea what science is. So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of paranormal phenomena kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e02e2$0$55876$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606974 |
On 11/28/2016 8:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>>> name-calling. >>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>>>> "exciting" story? >>>>> >>>>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>>>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >>>> >>>> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? >>> >>> Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. >>> >>> <snip remaining kook froth> >>> >>> >> So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two >> lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. >> >> You both have no idea what science is. > > So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of > paranormal phenomena kook? > Google is your friend, nutjob.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 23:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <v0g1hd-ile.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607083 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/28/2016 8:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>>>> name-calling. >>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>>>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>>>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>>>>> "exciting" story? >>>>>> >>>>>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>>>>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >>>>> >>>>> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? >>>> >>>> Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. >>>> >>>> <snip remaining kook froth> >>>> >>>> >>> So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two >>> lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. >>> >>> You both have no idea what science is. >> >> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of >> paranormal phenomena kook? >> > Google is your friend, nutjob. Strange that Google has no results for such and there is no university in the world with a department of paranormal phenomena kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e1a28$0$40798$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607121 |
On 11/29/2016 6:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/28/2016 8:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>>>>> name-calling. >>>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>>>>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>>>>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>>>>>> "exciting" story? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>>>>>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >>>>>> >>>>>> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? >>>>> >>>>> Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. >>>>> >>>>> <snip remaining kook froth> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two >>>> lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. >>>> >>>> You both have no idea what science is. >>> >>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of >>> paranormal phenomena kook? >>> >> Google is your friend, nutjob. > > Strange that Google has no results for such and there is no university > in the world with a department of paranormal phenomena kook. Wrong. Waste of time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 01:23 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <2am1hd-s9f.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607138 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 6:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/28/2016 8:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>>>>>> name-calling. >>>>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>>>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>>>>>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>>>>>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>>>>>>> "exciting" story? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>>>>>>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? >>>>>> >>>>>> Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip remaining kook froth> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two >>>>> lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. >>>>> >>>>> You both have no idea what science is. >>>> >>>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of >>>> paranormal phenomena kook? >>>> >>> Google is your friend, nutjob. >> >> Strange that Google has no results for such and there is no university >> in the world with a department of paranormal phenomena kook. > > Wrong. If it is wrong then where are the positive results from a peer reviewed study of paranormal phenomena kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 21:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e3c69$0$10193$c3e8da3$fdf4f6af@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607157 |
On 11/29/2016 8:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/29/2016 6:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/28/2016 8:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>>>>>>> name-calling. >>>>>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>>>>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>>>>>>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>>>>>>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>>>>>>>> "exciting" story? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>>>>>>>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <snip remaining kook froth> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two >>>>>> lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. >>>>>> >>>>>> You both have no idea what science is. >>>>> >>>>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of >>>>> paranormal phenomena kook? >>>>> >>>> Google is your friend, nutjob. >>> >>> Strange that Google has no results for such and there is no university >>> in the world with a department of paranormal phenomena kook. >> >> Wrong. > > If it is wrong then where are the positive results from a peer > reviewed study of paranormal phenomena kook? > > stalker
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-30 05:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <3862hd-9sg.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607183 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/29/2016 8:23 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/29/2016 6:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 11/28/2016 8:36 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 11:05 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2016 9:25 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/24/2016 9:08 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>>>>>>>> HARDBLOW, the loser, knows no science. Just lies, fantasies and >>>>>>>>>>>> name-calling. >>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>>>>>>>> How many patents do you have? How many papers published in Phys. Rev.? >>>>>>>>>>> What have you ever published except fluff pieces on firemen rescuing >>>>>>>>>>> child's cat from a tree? What kind of lies does it take to make that an >>>>>>>>>>> "exciting" story? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What does all of that rambling babble have to do with the fact that no >>>>>>>>>> test of paranormal phenomena has had postive results kook? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What does your statement have to do with any actual measured data? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nothing as there is no "actual measured data", just null results kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <snip remaining kook froth> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> So reality is what you say it is? Gosh HVAC believes that too. You two >>>>>>> lovers need to get together and get your stories straight. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You both have no idea what science is. >>>>>> >>>>>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of >>>>>> paranormal phenomena kook? >>>>>> >>>>> Google is your friend, nutjob. >>>> >>>> Strange that Google has no results for such and there is no university >>>> in the world with a department of paranormal phenomena kook. >>> >>> Wrong. >> >> If it is wrong then where are the positive results from a peer >> reviewed study of paranormal phenomena kook? >> >> > stalker Where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of paranormal phenomena kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-27 08:29 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <e95e18c1-ac1a-421e-b20e-0abf9014a372@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #606599 |
BJ quacked > > BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. > > Chill out bro. Fist bump? > Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. ------------ Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. Lol. I love being me
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-28 16:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583ca562$0$34540$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606691 |
On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: > BJ quacked >> >> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >> >> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >> > Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. > ------------ > > Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. > > This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. > > Lol. I love being me > Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. All can easily see (except maybe nutjob Chimp) what you are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 01:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <cp2vgd-o95.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #606906 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: >> BJ quacked >>> >>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>> >>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>> >> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >> ------------ >> >> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >> >> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >> >> Lol. I love being me >> > Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. > > All can easily see (except maybe nutjob > Chimp) what you are. So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic phenomena kook? -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 17:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e02f6$0$55876$c3e8da3$33881b6a@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #606975 |
On 11/28/2016 8:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: >>> BJ quacked >>>> >>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>> >>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>> >>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>> ------------ >>> >>> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >>> >>> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >>> >>> Lol. I love being me >>> >> Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. >> >> All can easily see (except maybe nutjob >> Chimp) what you are. > > So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic > phenomena kook? > > Google is your friend, lazyass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 23:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <15g1hd-ile.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #607084 |
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/28/2016 8:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>> BJ quacked >>>>> >>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>> >>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>> >>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>> ------------ >>>> >>>> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >>>> >>>> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >>>> >>>> Lol. I love being me >>>> >>> Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. >>> >>> All can easily see (except maybe nutjob >>> Chimp) what you are. >> >> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >> phenomena kook? >> >> > Google is your friend, lazyass. Funny Google has no results for such and there is no university in the world with a department of psychic phenomena kook. If there were positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic phenomena one would expect there would be lots of universities around the world studying it kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-11-29 19:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <583e1a4a$0$40798$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #607122 |
On 11/29/2016 6:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >> On 11/28/2016 8:38 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>> On 11/27/2016 11:29 AM, HVAC wrote: >>>>> BJ quacked >>>>>> >>>>>> BJ just because I exposed you for being a fraud and a purveyor of paranormal fringe 'science' who has no clue of the hard work that true science requires, there's no need to get yourself worked up into such a lather. >>>>>> >>>>>> Chill out bro. Fist bump? >>>>>> >>>>> Truth is not "lather" Hardblow. Tis I who have exposed you as the fraud. >>>>> ------------ >>>>> >>>>> Ah yes! The time honored "I know you are but what am I" defense. >>>>> >>>>> This is well know to 10 year olds and those other children who believe in ghosts. >>>>> >>>>> Lol. I love being me >>>>> >>>> Con man rule: Deny, deny, deny. Never tell the truth. >>>> >>>> All can easily see (except maybe nutjob >>>> Chimp) what you are. >>> >>> So where is your positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic >>> phenomena kook? >>> >>> >> Google is your friend, lazyass. > > Funny Google has no results for such and there is no university in the > world with a department of psychic phenomena kook. > > If there were positive results from a peer reviewed study of psychic > phenomena one would expect there would be lots of universities around > the world studying it kook. Denier. Waste of time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 15 of 19 — ← Prev page 1 … 13 14 [15] 16 17 … 19 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web