Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #566807 > unrolled thread

Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years

Started bySam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
First post2016-03-30 20:36 -0500
Last post2016-03-31 01:06 -0400
Articles 7 — 5 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-03-30 20:36 -0500
    Re: Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-03-31 02:35 +0000
      Re: Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 01:04 -0400
    Re: Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-03-30 23:31 -0400
      Re: Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 01:09 -0400
    Re: Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-30 22:46 -0500
      Re: Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-03-31 01:06 -0400

#566807 — Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years

FromSam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-30 20:36 -0500
SubjectSea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years
Message-ID<baadnVPIuPOy4mHLnZ2dnUU7-Q0AAAAA@giganews.com>
Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years
> http://phys.org/news/2016-03-sea-level-earlier-years.html


> A new study from climate scientists Robert DeConto at the University
> of Massachusetts Amherst and David Pollard at Pennsylvania State
> University suggests that the most recent estimates by the
> Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for future sea-level rise
> over the next 100 years could be too low by almost a factor of two.
> Details appear in the current issue of Nature.


-- 

sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated
to the discussion of physics, news from the physics
community, and physics-related social issues.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#566812

Fromjimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Date2016-03-31 02:35 +0000
Message-ID<a0fusc-m4j.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
In reply to#566807
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years

And still be less than a snail's pace.

And still not physics.

And still spam.


-- 
Jim Pennino

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566847

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-31 01:04 -0400
Message-ID<Rd2Ly.77757$uT1.48307@fx27.iad>
In reply to#566812
On 03/30/2016 10:35 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years
>
> And still be less than a snail's pace.
>
> And still not physics.
>
> And still spam.
>

And monkeys COULD fly out of my ass!

Sam, didn't get the message that the sea has been rising since the ice 
age ended. I guess he missed the 120 METER rise earlier and has to panic 
over 2mm a year.



-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566819

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2016-03-30 23:31 -0400
Message-ID<kf6pfb9ijnr5da4ulrun80njb23o8nohc7@4ax.com>
In reply to#566807
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:36:47 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:

>Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years

... or, it could not.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566852

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-31 01:09 -0400
Message-ID<xi2Ly.77760$uT1.29653@fx27.iad>
In reply to#566819
On 03/30/2016 11:31 PM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 20:36:47 -0500, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>> Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years
>
> ... or, it could not.
>
>
Or "professor" Sam COULD start posting actual facts instead of 
breathless anti-science nonsense.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566821

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-03-30 22:46 -0500
Message-ID<ndi6i3$1odb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#566807
On 3/30/2016 8:36 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
> Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100 years
>> http://phys.org/news/2016-03-sea-level-earlier-years.html
>

>> A new study from climate scientists Robert DeConto at the University
>> of Massachusetts Amherst and David Pollard at Pennsylvania State
>> University suggests that the most recent estimates by the
>> Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for future sea-level rise
>> over the next 100 years could be too low by almost a factor of two.
>> Details appear in the current issue of Nature.
>
>

what about the next 10 years, could it be too low by almost a factor of 
two hundred ?

What about the next 1000 years, could it be too low by almost a factor 
of 1.1 ?

Arn't the WAVES on the seas, 10,000,000 times greater than the averaged 
global sea level rise in 10 years ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566848

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-31 01:06 -0400
Message-ID<8f2Ly.77758$uT1.37794@fx27.iad>
In reply to#566821
On 03/30/2016 11:46 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 3/30/2016 8:36 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
>> Sea-level rise could nearly double over earlier estimates in next 100
>> years
>>> http://phys.org/news/2016-03-sea-level-earlier-years.html
>>
>
>>> A new study from climate scientists Robert DeConto at the University
>>> of Massachusetts Amherst and David Pollard at Pennsylvania State
>>> University suggests that the most recent estimates by the
>>> Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for future sea-level rise
>>> over the next 100 years could be too low by almost a factor of two.
>>> Details appear in the current issue of Nature.
>>
>>
>
> what about the next 10 years, could it be too low by almost a factor of
> two hundred ?
>
> What about the next 1000 years, could it be too low by almost a factor
> of 1.1 ?
>
> Arn't the WAVES on the seas, 10,000,000 times greater than the averaged
> global sea level rise in 10 years ?

Sergio, you need to get with the program. Quit being reasonable and 
giving out facts. We've got a huge TAX to sell here!

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web