Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521637 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 175 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 11:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:47 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 16:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-17 12:11 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 09:04 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:31 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:04 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:15 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 15:57 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 15:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:21 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 14:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:21 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:27 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:15 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-17 17:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:28 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:09 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:25 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kid Wills is a BIG LIAR ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-17 19:45 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 15:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 19:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 16:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 20:35 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 09:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 22:28 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 16:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-17 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 21:48 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 09:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 20:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:29 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:13 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:36 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-19 13:20 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:38 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 12:52 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 12:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 18:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:53 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:35 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 05:32 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 12:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 17:07 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:39 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:50 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:14 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 23:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 20:33 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:57 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:34 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:52 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:19 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 21:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-21 03:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 08:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 15:35 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( Kidd caught in even more lies ) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:37 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:48 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 10:01 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-21 10:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 09:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:07 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-22 17:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 23:27 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 07:56 +0200
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 01:56 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:41 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:05 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-19 20:32 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 20:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 01:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-20 09:52 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:30 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-20 15:21 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-09-21 13:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 17:55 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:23 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 07:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:31 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:59 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:07 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 07:57 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 07:22 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:20 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:19 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 03:01 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:48 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:24 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 13:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-18 18:02 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:40 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 17:32 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-17 22:54 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 06:39 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-18 19:14 +0100
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:08 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:01 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-19 09:29 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 14:05 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 09:54 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-18 16:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:44 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-18 14:02 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-19 00:34 +0000
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:10 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:18 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 14:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 22:09 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 13:03 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 12:17 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 14:41 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 18:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:53 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 21:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 22:44 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-20 23:56 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:30 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 02:58 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 06:34 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:17 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:22 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:39 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! ( the Ediot forgets a link I gave him earlier ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:58 -0500
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-19 01:16 -0400
Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:39 -0500
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 10:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! |
| Message-ID | <acydnTHAs6IMSGfInZ2dnUU7-XWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
"Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... > 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials that they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. <G> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s Rocky
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 11:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtelio$qef$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521637 |
Rocky wrote: > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 > > Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The > Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, > Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the > Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials that > they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. <G> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner > > Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only > dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: > > Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 > ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) > https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s > > Rocky If you would quit crossposting things to alt.conspiracies, those idiots would not be replying. And we could actually start a civil discussion, without their noise.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-18 09:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3065dffa3a0ffc3298c2b5@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521641 |
In article <mtelio$qef$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > Rocky wrote: > > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > > news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... > >> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 > > > > Thanks and cool video but it is too bad that Tony the heckler , The > > Ediot, Kidd Wills, Sarah the Stalker, jimp, BKD, Giv Shitt, Michael, > > Sual, Hagbor and others will ask for proof by Willie E Coyote or the > > Roadrunner because those two are the only two with the credentials that > > they believe as proven by they still think the CGIs were real. <G> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wile_E._Coyote_and_The_Road_Runner > > > > Oh yes, because the software that added CGIs to hundreds of videos only > > dealt with buildings it had problems with a crane. See: > > > > Believe Your Own Eyes - 9/11 - No "Planes" Were Ever Used.mp4 > > ( Time indexed to start at 25:58 ) > > https://youtu.be/IL8cJWyOxWQ?t=25m58s > > > > Rocky > > > > > If you would quit crossposting things to alt.conspiracies, those idiots > would not be replying. > And we could actually start a civil discussion, without their noise. Sorry, but Troofery needs to be called what it is, Bullshit. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 16:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <bh6rcc-sis.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521637 |
In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 > > Thanks and cool video Obviously a kook video. From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 12:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mtes8q$avc$2@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #521655 |
On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >> >> Thanks and cool video > > Obviously a kook video. > > From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of > eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. > > is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat and let it drive you to 7-11 ? When does that make sense ? drunk, sleeping, or kook ??
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 09:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521657 |
gilber34 wrote: > On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>> >>> Thanks and cool video >> >> Obviously a kook video. >> >> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of >> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >> >> > > > is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? > > Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat > and let it drive you to 7-11 ? > > When does that make sense ? > > drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? no no no,....9/11 Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously Here, drive this. Cruise Missile https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 09:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30672dcd40bdeedc98c2c0@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521990 |
In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > gilber34 wrote: > > On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > >>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... > >>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 > >>> > >>> Thanks and cool video > >> > >> Obviously a kook video. > >> > >> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of > >> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. > >> > >> > > > > > > is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? > > > > Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat > > and let it drive you to 7-11 ? > > > > When does that make sense ? > > > > drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? > > > > > > > > > no no no,....9/11 > Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously > > Here, drive this. > > Cruise Missile > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-19 12:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtk30d$nqa$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521996 |
BDK wrote: > In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> gilber34 wrote: >>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and cool video >>>> >>>> Obviously a kook video. >>>> >>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of >>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? >>> >>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat >>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ? >>> >>> When does that make sense ? >>> >>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> no no no,....9/11 >> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously >> >> Here, drive this. >> >> Cruise Missile >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY > > Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? > > If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... Perish the thought from your pointy little head. I have no expectation that anything that challenges your official 9/11 fairytale bible, will ever be taken seriously by you. Just as I am sure that the Scientologists would also never agree that Thetans and Lord Zenu are ficticious. I post for the benefit of others who likely will never respond to any of my posts. But will watch the videos and look at the mounting evidence about 9/11 for themselves, start asking their own questions, do their own research, and make their own decisions. Fascisms come and go, but basic truths endure.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 05:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <431tvadkesc678uml6tl2evnrgrtf6m601@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522031 |
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:39:07 -0400, "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid>
wrote:
>BDK wrote:
>> In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>>
>>> gilber34 wrote:
>>>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV!
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks and cool video
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously a kook video.
>>>>>
>>>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of
>>>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ?
>>>>
>>>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat
>>>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ?
>>>>
>>>> When does that make sense ?
>>>>
>>>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ??
>>>
>>>
>>> no no no,....9/11
>>> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously
>>>
>>> Here, drive this.
>>>
>>> Cruise Missile
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY
>>
>> Do you really think we sane people take you seriously?
>>
>> If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought...
>
>
>Perish the thought from your pointy little head.
>
>I have no expectation that anything that challenges your official 9/11
>fairytale bible, will ever be taken seriously by you.
>Just as I am sure that the Scientologists would also never agree that
>Thetans and Lord Zenu are ficticious.
>
But I ate at his pizza place three weeks ago.
Wait. That was Zeno's Pizza, not Zenu's pizza. My bad.
>I post for the benefit of others who likely will never respond to any of my
>posts.
It's is possible they're laughing too hard to form a reply. More
likely, however, is they just figured your mentally ill and moved on.
>But will watch the videos and look at the mounting evidence about 9/11 for
>themselves, start asking their own questions, do their own research, and
>make their own decisions.
And decide you're a k00k, of course.
>
>Fascisms come and go, but basic truths endure.
>
Which is why the Troofer religion will not stand the test of
time.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 05:15 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5p1tvape83a7na3k36tk9f496mnvl21rju@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522185 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 05:04:10 -0500, "K Wills (Shill #3)"
<compuelf@gmail.com> wrote:
>is they just figured your mentally ill and moved on.
That should be "...you're mentally ill..."
More proof, if any were needed, that I should not be allowed to
proofread my own posts.
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 10:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3068878c7867c2d098c2c6@news.giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522031 |
In article <mtk30d$nqa$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > > BDK wrote: > > In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... > >> > >> gilber34 wrote: > >>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message > >>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... > >>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! > >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks and cool video > >>>> > >>>> Obviously a kook video. > >>>> > >>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of > >>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? > >>> > >>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat > >>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ? > >>> > >>> When does that make sense ? > >>> > >>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> no no no,....9/11 > >> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously > >> > >> Here, drive this. > >> > >> Cruise Missile > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY > > > > Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? > > > > If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... > > > > > > > > Perish the thought from your pointy little head. > > I have no expectation that anything that challenges your official 9/11 > fairytale bible, will ever be taken seriously by you. > Just as I am sure that the Scientologists would also never agree that > Thetans and Lord Zenu are ficticious. > > I post for the benefit of others who likely will never respond to any of my > posts. > But will watch the videos and look at the mounting evidence about 9/11 for > themselves, start asking their own questions, do their own research, and > make their own decisions. Anyone with a basic knowledge of science, and/or building construction instantly knows Troofery is just an amusing form of bullshit. > > Fascisms come and go, but basic truths endure. And Troofers always make nonsensical claims, you can't do anything else, except make sane people laugh at you. And we do, all the time. -- BDK: Head Government Shill, Psychotronic World Dominator. Master of Remote Viewing. Level 6 expert in kOOkStudies. Former FEMA camp activities director. Head Strategic Writer. Former Black Helicopter color consultant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 09:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fbudnQ9GE77wVWPInZ2dnUU7-eGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522210 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.3068878c7867c2d098c2c6@news.giganews.com... > In article <mtk30d$nqa$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> BDK wrote: >> > In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >> > says... >> >> >> >> gilber34 wrote: >> >>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> >>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >> >>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >> >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks and cool video >> >>>> >> >>>> Obviously a kook video. >> >>>> >> >>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands >> >>>> of >> >>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? >> >>> >> >>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat >> >>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ? >> >>> >> >>> When does that make sense ? >> >>> >> >>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> no no no,....9/11 >> >> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously >> >> >> >> Here, drive this. >> >> >> >> Cruise Missile >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY >> > >> > Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? >> > >> > If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Perish the thought from your pointy little head. >> >> I have no expectation that anything that challenges your official 9/11 >> fairytale bible, will ever be taken seriously by you. >> Just as I am sure that the Scientologists would also never agree that >> Thetans and Lord Zenu are ficticious. >> >> I post for the benefit of others who likely will never respond to any of >> my >> posts. >> But will watch the videos and look at the mounting evidence about 9/11 >> for >> themselves, start asking their own questions, do their own research, and >> make their own decisions. > > Anyone with a basic knowledge of science, and/or building construction > instantly knows Troofery is just an amusing form of bullshit. > >> >> Fascisms come and go, but basic truths endure. > > And Troofers always make nonsensical claims, you can't do anything else, > except make sane people laugh at you. Too bad you are not in a position to talk for sane people. > And we do, all the time. Who is "we?" You certainly count sane people if you can't even mention one. DUH. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <fsfuvad02sio0drk54dnj7hg9foit1a2it@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522212 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:56:14 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
[...]
>>> Perish the thought from your pointy little head.
>>>
>>> I have no expectation that anything that challenges your official 9/11
>>> fairytale bible, will ever be taken seriously by you.
>>> Just as I am sure that the Scientologists would also never agree that
>>> Thetans and Lord Zenu are ficticious.
>>>
>>> I post for the benefit of others who likely will never respond to any of
>>> my
>>> posts.
>>> But will watch the videos and look at the mounting evidence about 9/11
>>> for
>>> themselves, start asking their own questions, do their own research, and
>>> make their own decisions.
>>
>> Anyone with a basic knowledge of science, and/or building construction
>> instantly knows Troofery is just an amusing form of bullshit.
>>
>>>
>>> Fascisms come and go, but basic truths endure.
>>
>> And Troofers always make nonsensical claims, you can't do anything else,
>> except make sane people laugh at you.
>
>Too bad you are not in a position to talk for sane people.
>
Says the guy who is so mentally ill he changes his story about
9/11 from time to time, insisting each new version is 100% true.
Until it's not, of course.
>> And we do, all the time.
>
>Who is "we?" You certainly count sane people if you can't even mention one.
>DUH.
I would be counted within the "we" BDK mentions. DUH.
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 07:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4vGdndaLM5aqNWPInZ2dnUU7-KGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #521996 |
"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message news:MPG.30672dcd40bdeedc98c2c0@news.giganews.com... > In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >> >> gilber34 wrote: >> > On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> >>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >> >>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >> >>> >> >>> Thanks and cool video >> >> >> >> Obviously a kook video. >> >> >> >> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of >> >> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? >> > >> > Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat >> > and let it drive you to 7-11 ? >> > >> > When does that make sense ? >> > >> > drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> no no no,....9/11 >> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously >> >> Here, drive this. >> >> Cruise Missile >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY > > Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? > > If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... Well, you can not be considered a sane person because you can't even present a valid argument. You always avoid the real issues by moving the goal post. Hell, you probably even think of Wile E. Coyote as your Physics Professor and don't realize that thermate was used to make those life-sized road runner cut outs in the Twin Towers that are even screwed up if you compare them to a real 767. <G> And if the metal from those cutouts was supposed to be pushed in why did so much of the Twin Towers end up on the ground in front of those road runner cutouts instead? And don't say jet fuel is explosive because look up jet fuel in a list of explosives and see that it is about as explosive as burning leaves. 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 15:57 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mtmhe1$6vr$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #522202 |
On 20/09/2015 13:35, Rocky wrote: > "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message > news:MPG.30672dcd40bdeedc98c2c0@news.giganews.com... >> In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says... >>> >>> gilber34 wrote: >>>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks and cool video >>>>> >>>>> Obviously a kook video. >>>>> >>>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of >>>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? >>>> >>>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat >>>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ? >>>> >>>> When does that make sense ? >>>> >>>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> no no no,....9/11 >>> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously >>> >>> Here, drive this. >>> >>> Cruise Missile >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY >> >> Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? >> >> If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... > > Well, you can not be considered a sane person because you can't even present > a valid argument. You always avoid the real issues by moving the goal post. > Is that like telling us that the planes were holograms & then changing your mind to tell us they were CGI's. Or changing that the TT's were brought down by 'thermate' to nukes? > Hell, you probably even think of Wile E. Coyote as your Physics Professor > and don't realize that thermate was used to make those life-sized road > runner cut outs in the Twin Towers that are even screwed up if you compare > them to a real 767. <G> > > And if the metal from those cutouts was supposed to be pushed in why did so > much of the Twin Towers end up on the ground in front of those road runner > cutouts instead? > So your changing your mind again, you have told us that the TT's floated away, now your saying it ended up on the ground. > And don't say jet fuel is explosive because look up jet fuel in a list of > explosives and see that it is about as explosive as burning leaves. > I can't recall anybody calling jet fuel explosive. > 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 15:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <_pydnbM0o7C4imLInZ2dnUU7-TGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522213 |
"naazim palan" <naazimpalan@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4be49a9a-89db-4805-9f54-20cdadd0e21c@googlegroups.com... > On Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 3:57:59 PM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote: >> On 20/09/2015 13:35, Rocky wrote: >> > "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >> > news:MPG.30672dcd40bdeedc98c2c0@news.giganews.com... >> >> In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >> >> says... >> >>> >> >>> gilber34 wrote: >> >>>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> >>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> >>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >> >>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Thanks and cool video >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Obviously a kook video. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands >> >>>>> of >> >>>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? >> >>>> >> >>>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger >> >>>> seat >> >>>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ? >> >>>> >> >>>> When does that make sense ? >> >>>> >> >>>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> no no no,....9/11 >> >>> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously >> >>> >> >>> Here, drive this. >> >>> >> >>> Cruise Missile >> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY >> >> >> >> Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? >> >> >> >> If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... >> > >> > Well, you can not be considered a sane person because you can't even >> > present >> > a valid argument. You always avoid the real issues by moving the goal >> > post. >> > >> >> Is that like telling us that the planes were holograms & then changing >> your mind to tell us they were CGI's. >> >> Or changing that the TT's were brought down by 'thermate' to nukes? >> >> > Hell, you probably even think of Wile E. Coyote as your Physics >> > Professor >> > and don't realize that thermate was used to make those life-sized road >> > runner cut outs in the Twin Towers that are even screwed up if you >> > compare >> > them to a real 767. <G> >> > >> > And if the metal from those cutouts was supposed to be pushed in why >> > did so >> > much of the Twin Towers end up on the ground in front of those road >> > runner >> > cutouts instead? >> > >> >> So your changing your mind again, you have told us that the TT's floated >> away, now your saying it ended up on the ground. >> >> > And don't say jet fuel is explosive because look up jet fuel in a list >> > of >> > explosives and see that it is about as explosive as burning leaves. >> > >> >> I can't recall anybody calling jet fuel explosive. Go back and look at the damage to the North Tower. Nothing came out of the North Tower so what made the big holes in either the east or west side of the North Tower? Jet fuel could not have done that so it had to be something else. DUH. >> > 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >> > >> > Rocky >> > >> > > > > Be quite, Rocky does not like it when people remind him of what he said > was true. > Now he says something else, so he must have been lying. > > Give him a few months & he will invent something new. look above and then guess again. Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 23:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mtnb0g$k6t$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #522276 |
On 20/09/2015 21:28, Rocky wrote: > "naazim palan" <naazimpalan@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:4be49a9a-89db-4805-9f54-20cdadd0e21c@googlegroups.com... >> On Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 3:57:59 PM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote: >>> On 20/09/2015 13:35, Rocky wrote: >>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>> news:MPG.30672dcd40bdeedc98c2c0@news.giganews.com... >>>>> In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and cool video >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Obviously a kook video. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger >>>>>>> seat >>>>>>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> When does that make sense ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> no no no,....9/11 >>>>>> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously >>>>>> >>>>>> Here, drive this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cruise Missile >>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY >>>>> >>>>> Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? >>>>> >>>>> If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... >>>> >>>> Well, you can not be considered a sane person because you can't even >>>> present >>>> a valid argument. You always avoid the real issues by moving the goal >>>> post. >>>> >>> >>> Is that like telling us that the planes were holograms & then changing >>> your mind to tell us they were CGI's. >>> >>> Or changing that the TT's were brought down by 'thermate' to nukes? >>> >>>> Hell, you probably even think of Wile E. Coyote as your Physics >>>> Professor >>>> and don't realize that thermate was used to make those life-sized road >>>> runner cut outs in the Twin Towers that are even screwed up if you >>>> compare >>>> them to a real 767. <G> >>>> >>>> And if the metal from those cutouts was supposed to be pushed in why >>>> did so >>>> much of the Twin Towers end up on the ground in front of those road >>>> runner >>>> cutouts instead? >>>> >>> >>> So your changing your mind again, you have told us that the TT's floated >>> away, now your saying it ended up on the ground. >>> >>>> And don't say jet fuel is explosive because look up jet fuel in a list >>>> of >>>> explosives and see that it is about as explosive as burning leaves. >>>> >>> >>> I can't recall anybody calling jet fuel explosive. > > Go back and look at the damage to the North Tower. Nothing came out of the > North Tower so what made the big holes in either the east or west side of > the North Tower? Jet fuel could not have done that so it had to be > something else. DUH. > > Evasion noted, do tell us if anybody called jet fuel explosive? >>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >>>> >>>> Rocky >>>> >>>> >> >> >> Be quite, Rocky does not like it when people remind him of what he said >> was true. >> Now he says something else, so he must have been lying. >> >> Give him a few months & he will invent something new. > > look above and then guess again. > > Rocky > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <JrKdnRMaE9WQoWLInZ2dnUU7-SWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #522328 |
"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:mtnb0g$k6t$2@dont-email.me... > On 20/09/2015 21:28, Rocky wrote: >> "naazim palan" <naazimpalan@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4be49a9a-89db-4805-9f54-20cdadd0e21c@googlegroups.com... >>> On Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 3:57:59 PM UTC+1, Tony Dragon wrote: >>>> On 20/09/2015 13:35, Rocky wrote: >>>>> "BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:MPG.30672dcd40bdeedc98c2c0@news.giganews.com... >>>>>> In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> gilber34 wrote: >>>>>>>> On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>>>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks and cool video >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Obviously a kook video. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were >>>>>>>>> thousands >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is the Google self driving car, a kook car ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger >>>>>>>> seat >>>>>>>> and let it drive you to 7-11 ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When does that make sense ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> drunk, sleeping, or kook ?? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> no no no,....9/11 >>>>>>> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you >>>>>>> seriously >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here, drive this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cruise Missile >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you really think we sane people take you seriously? >>>>>> >>>>>> If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought... >>>>> >>>>> Well, you can not be considered a sane person because you can't even >>>>> present >>>>> a valid argument. You always avoid the real issues by moving the goal >>>>> post. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is that like telling us that the planes were holograms & then changing >>>> your mind to tell us they were CGI's. >>>> >>>> Or changing that the TT's were brought down by 'thermate' to nukes? >>>> >>>>> Hell, you probably even think of Wile E. Coyote as your Physics >>>>> Professor >>>>> and don't realize that thermate was used to make those life-sized road >>>>> runner cut outs in the Twin Towers that are even screwed up if you >>>>> compare >>>>> them to a real 767. <G> >>>>> >>>>> And if the metal from those cutouts was supposed to be pushed in why >>>>> did so >>>>> much of the Twin Towers end up on the ground in front of those road >>>>> runner >>>>> cutouts instead? >>>>> >>>> >>>> So your changing your mind again, you have told us that the TT's >>>> floated >>>> away, now your saying it ended up on the ground. >>>> >>>>> And don't say jet fuel is explosive because look up jet fuel in a list >>>>> of >>>>> explosives and see that it is about as explosive as burning leaves. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I can't recall anybody calling jet fuel explosive. >> >> Go back and look at the damage to the North Tower. Nothing came out of >> the >> North Tower so what made the big holes in either the east or west side of >> the North Tower? Jet fuel could not have done that so it had to be >> something else. DUH. >> >> > > Evasion noted, do tell us if anybody called jet fuel explosive? Do yourself a favor and watch some of the youtube videos that have been posted. That way you will not be so st00pid. Here I'll even help you with a list to a few of them and in one of the videos you will find out who tries to say jet fuel is explosive. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEA05F393EC843D80 >>>>> 911 CrashPhysics REAL plane hits bldg/ falls to the ground. >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ER6ZQUWvDFs >>>>> >>>>> Rocky >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> Be quite, Rocky does not like it when people remind him of what he said >>> was true. >>> Now he says something else, so he must have been lying. >>> >>> Give him a few months & he will invent something new. >> >> look above and then guess again. >> >> Rocky
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-20 18:21 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <bqfuva5cn1kvb4cnm8g4a7fckt48vpsqkb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #522202 |
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 07:35:07 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"BDK" <Control@Worldcontrol.com> wrote in message
>news:MPG.30672dcd40bdeedc98c2c0@news.giganews.com...
>> In article <mtjmcb$3d3$1@dont-email.me>, fakename@nomail.invalid says...
>>>
>>> gilber34 wrote:
>>> > On 9/17/2015 11:32 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>> >> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message
>>> >>> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me...
>>> >>>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV!
>>> >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks and cool video
>>> >>
>>> >> Obviously a kook video.
>>> >>
>>> >> From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of
>>> >> eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > is the Google self driving car, a kook car ?
>>> >
>>> > Would you buy a google self driving car and sit in the passenger seat
>>> > and let it drive you to 7-11 ?
>>> >
>>> > When does that make sense ?
>>> >
>>> > drunk, sleeping, or kook ??
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> no no no,....9/11
>>> Please try to stay awake if you want the adults to take you seriously
>>>
>>> Here, drive this.
>>>
>>> Cruise Missile
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD8Kr0f1tEY
>>
>> Do you really think we sane people take you seriously?
>>
>> If you do, you're even more fucked up than I thought...
>
>Well, you can not be considered a sane person because you can't even present
>a valid argument. You always avoid the real issues by moving the goal post.
>
Your going to use projection? Really?
>Hell, you probably even think of Wile E. Coyote as your Physics Professor
>and don't realize that thermate was used to make those life-sized road
>runner cut outs in the Twin Towers that are even screwed up if you compare
>them to a real 767. <G>
I'm still waiting for your valid, verifiable evidence of thermate
use. Will you offer it now, or continue to prove it's something your
mental defects made up?
>
>And if the metal from those cutouts was supposed to be pushed in why did so
>much of the Twin Towers end up on the ground in front of those road runner
>cutouts instead?
There was metal and glass. Plus part of the planes fell to the
ground as well. Yes, most was forced inside, but no one has ever
claimed all of it was.
What happened to your claim of CGIs? Did your mental defects
FINALLY allow you to accept the jets were real? You're making
progress.
>
>And don't say jet fuel is explosive because look up jet fuel in a list of
>explosives and see that it is about as explosive as burning leaves.
>
Did someone claim it is? Please post the MID for the post where
this claim is to be found.
[Snip of video you already KNOW doesn't report the truth]
What does linking to a video you know to be inaccurate gain you?
What benefit do you believe you receive from this particular lie?
"Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their
belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with."
Roger "Rocky" Wittekind explaining why he still claims nukes were used
on 9/11/01 in
Message-ID: <IoGdnbEGb_w08mvInZ2dnUU7-fmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 14:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mtf086$851$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #521655 |
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >> >> "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> wrote in message >> news:mtd0a8$hov$1@dont-email.me... >>> 9/11 Fake: As Seen On TV! >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaOOf0SwY08 >> >> Thanks and cool video > > Obviously a kook video. > > From the very start it ignores the fact that there were thousands of > eye witnesses present that saw the events, raving kook. Nope, And Urban Legend, not a single eyewitness in Manhattan saw any passenger 767's hit either tower, unless they saw it on TV. But many saw what they claimed appeared to be small jets without windows. or in the case of the second tower,... nothing at all other than an explosion Like this https://www.google.com/search?q=cruise+missile&biw=1783&bih=768&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMIx7amstb-xwIVjhWSCh28rw3i Listen and watch as they tell you themselves https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GffVvYFrtPM I'm not wasting my time posting these links for you again, since you continially ignore them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 9 [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web