Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #686340 > unrolled thread
| Started by | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-19 23:43 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-31 10:44 -0700 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 111 — 19 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-19 23:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 14:28 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 18:01 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-22 14:11 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 05:07 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 12:45 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 06:31 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 13:39 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 10:49 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 15:19 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 17:52 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-05-23 21:58 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-23 20:56 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-20 17:57 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-23 19:13 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 01:55 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 01:31 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-24 10:26 +0100
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 04:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-24 14:23 +0100
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 06:58 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 08:32 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 08:54 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 08:30 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 11:54 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 16:52 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:40 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 22:22 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:49 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-25 11:56 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-05-24 08:55 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-05-29 20:13 +0200
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-23 23:52 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-24 17:21 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-25 09:14 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-25 14:17 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-25 14:34 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:20 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-27 13:32 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-27 15:18 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 15:48 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 15:54 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 20:23 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-27 20:27 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 06:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 10:35 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-31 16:28 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 20:11 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-31 21:09 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 20:11 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 15:50 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-28 18:35 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-27 15:57 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 16:22 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-05-27 20:07 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 11:21 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:54 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 13:25 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 17:39 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 21:05 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 05:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 02:11 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 15:57 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-28 23:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-29 09:12 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:28 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 12:04 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-01 23:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-02 13:17 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:52 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-02 15:04 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:43 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-02 23:46 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-03 08:01 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-03 13:07 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-03 18:37 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-05 06:56 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-06-03 06:51 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 02:01 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 11:33 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 13:43 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 18:11 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-28 21:02 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 01:13 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 10:09 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 10:27 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:53 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 01:36 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 14:08 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-06-01 15:16 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity Earle Jones <earle.jones@comcast.net> - 2018-05-30 11:40 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 20:35 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 21:49 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-05-29 22:20 +1000
Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-29 07:19 -0700
Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 08:37 -0700
Time == Entropy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-29 09:44 -0700
Re: Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:23 -0400
Your desire to be "God, the Father" has been your down fall. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-29 10:28 -0700
Re: Your desire to be "God, the Father" has been your down fall. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:59 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 11:46 -0700
The Origin of Gravity sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-05-30 20:10 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-30 22:03 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:10 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-05-31 12:54 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:18 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> - 2018-06-01 16:18 +1000
Re: The Origin of Gravity Vaughn Fleck <guah@nhnw.nc> - 2018-06-01 20:00 +0000
Re: The Origin of Gravity poraty149@gmail.com - 2018-05-31 21:06 -0700
Re: The Origin of Gravity benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 02:07 -0400
Re: The Origin of Gravity "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-31 10:44 -0700
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
| From | numbernumber1964@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 11:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ea8a7fd7-c70a-49d0-8f1e-2f38e201fa1d@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #686340 |
Fukushima
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sam.wormley@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 20:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5757a2a1-3c03-47cb-99b4-055d10b8a2c0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #686340 |
Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 22:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5B0F8226.56CE@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687898 |
sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: > > Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv S0...you come back her and your first order of business is to hijack other people's Subject headings topics? Not off to a good start are you?? starting with the wrong foot forward... i don't expect much better from you...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 02:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <3mMPC.231049$Hv4.155391@fx39.iad> |
| In reply to | #687904 |
On 5/31/2018 1:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv > > > > S0...you come back her and your first order of business is to hijack other people's Subject headings topics? Not off to a good start are you?? > > starting with the wrong foot forward... > > > i don't expect much better from you... > Sorry Faker, but since you are a lib, we know that any math is WAY beyond your understanding let alone the science it represents. But Sam is posting in a science group for people who understand science not for people who write science fiction and think they can fool people into thinking they understand science. Please keep your "Deep thoughts" to yourself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 12:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <5B1052DC.37D8@ix.netcom.com> |
| In reply to | #687914 |
benj wrote: > > On 5/31/2018 1:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: > >> > >> Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv > > > > > > > > S0...you come back her and your first order of business is to hijack other people's Subject headings topics? Not off to a good start are you?? > > > > starting with the wrong foot forward... > > > > > > i don't expect much better from you... > > > Sorry Faker, but since you are a lib, we know that any math is WAY > beyond your understanding let alone the science it represents. But Sam > is posting in a science group for people who understand science not for > people who write science fiction and think they can fool people into > thinking they understand science. Please keep your "Deep thoughts" to > yourself. Can you explain to me your use of the word...'plonk' means?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 17:18 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <VEZPC.126592$pg3.105014@fx29.iad> |
| In reply to | #688000 |
On 5/31/2018 3:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote: > benj wrote: >> >> On 5/31/2018 1:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>> sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: >>>> >>>> Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv >>> >>> >>> >>> S0...you come back her and your first order of business is to hijack other people's Subject headings topics? Not off to a good start are you?? >>> >>> starting with the wrong foot forward... >>> >>> >>> i don't expect much better from you... >>> >> Sorry Faker, but since you are a lib, we know that any math is WAY >> beyond your understanding let alone the science it represents. But Sam >> is posting in a science group for people who understand science not for >> people who write science fiction and think they can fool people into >> thinking they understand science. Please keep your "Deep thoughts" to >> yourself. > > > Can you explain to me your use of the word...'plonk' means? > Sure. It's an internet term of the highest praise for people posting their "deep thoughts". It means your ideas created some action out there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 16:18 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <hI-dnaaQ3bHYeI3GnZ2dnUU7-Y2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| In reply to | #688008 |
On 1/06/2018 7:18 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/31/2018 3:54 PM, The Starmaker wrote: >> benj wrote: >>> >>> On 5/31/2018 1:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote: >>>> sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> S0...you come back her and your first order of business is to hijack >>>> other people's Subject headings topics? Not off to a good start are >>>> you?? >>>> >>>> starting with the wrong foot forward... >>>> >>>> >>>> i don't expect much better from you... >>>> >>> Sorry Faker, but since you are a lib, we know that any math is WAY >>> beyond your understanding let alone the science it represents. But Sam >>> is posting in a science group for people who understand science not for >>> people who write science fiction and think they can fool people into >>> thinking they understand science. Please keep your "Deep thoughts" to >>> yourself. >> >> >> Can you explain to me your use of the word...'plonk' means? >> > Sure. It's an internet term of the highest praise for people posting > their "deep thoughts". It means your ideas created some action out there. > You forgot the 'not' at the end. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vaughn Fleck <guah@nhnw.nc> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 20:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pes8k6$7ad$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #688008 |
benj wrote: >>> Sorry Faker, but since you are a lib, we know that any math is WAY >>> beyond your understanding let alone the science it represents. But Sam >>> is posting in a science group for people who understand science not for >>> people who write science fiction and think they can fool people into >>> thinking they understand science. Please keep your "Deep thoughts" to >>> yourself. >> >> Can you explain to me your use of the word...'plonk' means? >> > Sure. It's an internet term of the highest praise for people posting their > "deep thoughts". It means your ideas created some action out there. https://qz.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/elon-musk-2017-x-com-e1499755455548.jpg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | poraty149@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 21:06 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9c9130f2-bf9e-4803-9d45-ff4d0580c6c3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #688000 |
On Thursday, May 31, 2018 at 10:53:31 PM UTC+3, The Starmaker wrote: > benj wrote: > > > > On 5/31/2018 1:03 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > > > sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: > > >> > > >> Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv > > > > > > > > > > > > S0...you come back her and your first order of business is to hijack other people's Subject headings topics? Not off to a good start are you?? > > > > > > starting with the wrong foot forward... > > > > > > > > > i don't expect much better from you... > > > > > Sorry Faker, but since you are a lib, we know that any math is WAY > > beyond your understanding let alone the science it represents. But Sam > > is posting in a science group for people who understand science not for > > people who write science fiction and think they can fool people into > > thinking they understand science. Please keep your "Deep thoughts" to > > yourself. > > > Can you explain to me your use of the word...'plonk' means? =================== plonk means some bad un done properly wine I heard to much about me not my fault but the others idiot faults ==Y.P
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 02:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <IiMPC.182655$6C5.74157@fx07.iad> |
| In reply to | #687898 |
On 5/30/2018 11:10 PM, sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: > > Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv > G = Emc^2! (2 maybe 3 Nobels!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 10:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pepcfq$ldi$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687898 |
<sam.wormley@gmail.com>, the GR-Asshopper-Guru wrote: > "Guv = (8 pi G / c^4)" Tuv" where the 2nd G is NEWTON's > hanson wrote: Sam, Old chum, what has your "Guv = (8 pi G / c^4) Tuv" to do with any origin of anything at all?.... ahahahaha... > All you have done, Sam, is to post an equation that > 1) no-one (except for Bengj) in the set of current posters has any idea what it is supposed to say or mean ... LOL > 2) your post is re-warmed **überspitzte Judenphysik** of Einstein's Relativity, whose candle went out long and whose legend never lived... but to invoke all those > <http://tinyurl.com/Tears-for-Einsteins-Misery> wherein Albert confessed and said already long time ago: "In that case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, my gravitation theory included." "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".AE. > Only very stupid and geriatric kikes, such as cretin SwineBert Glazier, believe and got stuck in that time of yore, do cite it but having NO idea what it mean given that TurdBert couldn't even cut it as a plumber, and instead Glazier, the Pig became a Face-shitter & .<http://tinyurl.com/The-Chosen-Graveyard-Vandal> > 3) Einstein, the wannabe plumber, tried to get rid of **Newton's universal gravitational constant "G"** with his rubber trampoline, but Einstein FAILED, and he did hide Newton's G coyly is his GR field equation wherein the 2nd G in G_/uv = (8 pi G / c^4) is __still__ Newton's "G" .... > 4) Furthermore, today, even Newton's G is finally questioned, which should have been done centuries ago, because ___ Newton "ABSTRACTED" any ponderable mass to be ___ representable by a mathematical POINT @ x,y,z & t ______ > Hilariously, all current Einstein Dingleberries do not see that faux pas because of their worship of Albert's sphincter. <snicker> <chuckle> <chortle> ROTFLMAO
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web