Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #704363 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-24 16:17 +0000 |
| Last post | 2018-09-26 09:15 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 88 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Why pandora makes me sick! Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-24 16:17 +0000
Re: Why pandora makes me sick! Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 11:51 -0500
Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 10:02 -0700
Re: Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-24 17:10 +0000
Re: Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 12:48 -0500
Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 13:04 -0500
Re: Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:24 -0500
Re: Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-09-25 03:58 +0000
Re: Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:52 -0400
Re: Hitting "Post" is the same as flushing the toilet. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 08:16 -0500
Re: Why pandora makes me sick! vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-24 23:55 +0000
Re: Why pandora makes me sick! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:52 +0000
I'm not drinking Kensi's KoolAid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 02:20 -0700
Re: I'm not drinking Kensi's KoolAid. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:30 -0500
No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:24 -0700
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:47 -0400
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 10:55 -0400
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:28 -0400
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 10:33 -0500
Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 08:44 -0700
Re: Jeff-Relf posts are naturally refined fish poop. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:48 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:58 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 12:53 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:59 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:54 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 12:09 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:41 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:15 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 00:11 +0000
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 20:23 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 17:43 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 22:21 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:30 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:37 +0000
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 14:23 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 14:25 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 01:59 +0000
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:43 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 13:57 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:14 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:01 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 10:44 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:13 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 09:18 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 17:46 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:11 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 19:28 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 14:24 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:58 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 18:15 -0500
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:55 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:06 +0000
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 15:13 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:16 +0000
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 13:23 -0600
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 15:26 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:30 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:46 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:06 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:20 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:08 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:17 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:53 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-27 12:35 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:39 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:11 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 22:43 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 18:29 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:48 -0700
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 00:24 +0100
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-28 00:59 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-27 23:51 -0400
Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:04 -0700
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Oil is naturally refined fish poop. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 17:55 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Oil is naturally refined fish poop. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:03 +0000
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 15:11 -0400
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ????? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Oil is naturally refined fish poop. ? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ?? Snowflake ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:21 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:07 -0400
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 09:50 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:42 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:26 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:31 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:33 -0700
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:16 -0400
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:05 -0400
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:57 -0400
Re: No one is drinking Kensi's KoolAid. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:15 -0400
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 10:01 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <qfopqdlrg1gp49routs2aq3rrac6vlhp32@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704836 |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 04:43:16 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 9/26/2018 4:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: ><MUSHROOM CLOUD!> > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin > >Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of organisms. >The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed and >largely rejected. No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer reviewed paper from Harvard. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 10:44 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <poiqcp$1ktp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704850 |
On 9/27/2018 10:01 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 04:43:16 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 9/26/2018 4:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> <MUSHROOM CLOUD!> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin >> >> Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >> different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >> formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of organisms. >> The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >> petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >> deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed and >> largely rejected. > > No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article > over a peer reviewed paper from Harvard. Oil and gas were created in the great flood. That's because of porphyrins and isotope ratios prove that hydrocarbons and the sediments that trap them were all created in a very short time, geologically speaking, by plants and animals being drowned in anoxic sediments and turning into coal, oil and gas. That's bible, which is absolute truth. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 10:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <pois4f$1oep$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704857 |
On 9/27/2018 9:44 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
> On 9/27/2018 10:01 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 04:43:16 -0400, kensi
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 9/26/2018 4:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote:
>>> <MUSHROOM CLOUD!>
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin
>>>
>>> Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of
>>> different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are
>>> formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of organisms.
>>> The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all
>>> petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the
>>> deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed and
>>> largely rejected.
>>
>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article
>> over a peer reviewed paper from Harvard.
>
> Oil and gas were created in the great flood. That's because of
> porphyrins and isotope ratios prove that hydrocarbons and the sediments
> that trap them were all created in a very short time, geologically
> speaking, by plants and animals being drowned in anoxic sediments and
> turning into coal, oil and gas.
>
> That's bible, which is absolute truth.
>
The Koran is even truther.
--sh1:3 to sh1:5 "dig down deep, my brothers, till you hit the black
gold, sell it to the un-believers"
âØĢØØŊ اŲØĩاŲØŲŲ ŲاŲ ŲØŽŲØģ ŲŲ ØŲØąØĐ ŲŲŲŲŲ {ŲاŲŲ ØąŲØĻŲŲ Ø§ØąŲØŽŲØđŲŲŲŲ **ŲŲØđŲŲŲŲŲ
ØĢŲØđŲŲ
ŲŲŲ ØĩŲاŲŲØاŲ } Ø ØŦŲ
ŲŲŲØķ ŲاØĶŲŲا ŲŲŲØģŲ : Ųا ŲØŊ ØđØŊØŠ Ø ŲØĢØąŲا Ų
اذا ØŠŲØđŲ Øâ
â ŲØąŲŲ
اŲØīاذŲŲ, ØĢŲŲØ§Øą ØĩØšŲØąØĐ ŲØŲاØĐ ŲØĻŲØą
Quran 2:222, "The Cow," Dawood, p. 34
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 09:18 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-26AFDA.09180727092018@reader.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #704857 |
In article <poiqcp$1ktp$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote:
> Oil and gas were created in the great flood. That's because of
> porphyrins and isotope ratios prove that hydrocarbons and the sediments
> that trap them were all created in a very short time, geologically
> speaking, by plants and animals being drowned in anoxic sediments and
> turning into coal, oil and gas.
>
> That's bible, which is absolute truth.
Koan: JOSHU INSPECTS A LAGOON.
Joshu was playing fetch with a dog, tossing a glass ball that was one with sand
of the beach. The dog misstepped and fell into a stagnant lagoon and drowned. It
settled into the sandy bottom and became an oil puddle. Joshu said the lagoon
had angry dog-nature. At that moment the dog was enlightenned.
Noman's commentary:
When you have an oil derrick on your back, your life
has gone to the dogs.
A haiku on oil
is a slippery thing to write.
zen.dog.bark.bark.bark.
--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
An almond doesn't lactate. This post / \
Yet another supercilious snowflake for justice. insults Islam. Mohammed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 17:46 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <1nvsrvz.veqw3vljjmrmN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704873 |
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote: > In article <poiqcp$1ktp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > > > Oil and gas were created in the great flood. That's because of > > porphyrins and isotope ratios prove that hydrocarbons and the sediments > > that trap them were all created in a very short time, geologically > > speaking, by plants and animals being drowned in anoxic sediments and > > turning into coal, oil and gas. > > > > That's bible, which is absolute truth. > > > > Koan: JOSHU INSPECTS A LAGOON. > > Joshu was playing fetch with a dog, tossing a glass ball that was one with > sand of the beach. The dog misstepped and fell into a stagnant lagoon and > drowned. It settled into the sandy bottom and became an oil puddle. Joshu > said the lagoon had angry dog-nature. At that moment the dog was > enlightenned. > > Noman's commentary: > When you have an oil derrick on your back, your life > has gone to the dogs. > > A haiku on oil > is a slippery thing to write. > zen.dog.bark.bark.bark. > When work must be done And you have only a drill Make another hole. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 11:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <chine.bleu-42EAA5.11112327092018@reader.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #704878 |
In article <1nvsrvz.veqw3vljjmrmN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote: > Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > In article <poiqcp$1ktp$1@gioia.aioe.org>, > > mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> wrote: > > > > > Oil and gas were created in the great flood. That's because of > > > porphyrins and isotope ratios prove that hydrocarbons and the sediments > > > that trap them were all created in a very short time, geologically > > > speaking, by plants and animals being drowned in anoxic sediments and > > > turning into coal, oil and gas. > > > > > > That's bible, which is absolute truth. > > > > > > > Koan: JOSHU INSPECTS A LAGOON. > > > > Joshu was playing fetch with a dog, tossing a glass ball that was one with > > sand of the beach. The dog misstepped and fell into a stagnant lagoon and > > drowned. It settled into the sandy bottom and became an oil puddle. Joshu > > said the lagoon had angry dog-nature. At that moment the dog was > > enlightenned. > > > > Noman's commentary: > > When you have an oil derrick on your back, your life > > has gone to the dogs. > > > > A haiku on oil > > is a slippery thing to write. > > zen.dog.bark.bark.bark. > > > > When work must be done > And you have only a drill > Make another hole. Single hole in one. Double hole in, and yet more. 'Tis the holely one. -- :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @ 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ An almond doesn't lactate. This post / \ Yet another supercilious snowflake for justice. insults Islam. Mohammed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 19:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <1nvsw9q.1fb0x5vt1gwy2N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704897 |
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > A haiku on oil > > > is a slippery thing to write. > > > zen.dog.bark.bark.bark. > > > > > > > When work must be done > > And you have only a drill > > Make another hole. > > > > Single hole in one. > Double hole in, and yet more. > 'Tis the holely one. > Do not imbibe from Yellow tinted holes in snow The huskies go there. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 14:24 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <pojapm$k43$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704904 |
On 9/27/2018 1:28 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>>> A haiku on oil >>>> is a slippery thing to write. >>>> zen.dog.bark.bark.bark. >>>> >>> >>> When work must be done >>> And you have only a drill >>> Make another hole. >>> >> >> Single hole in one. >> Double hole in, and yet more. >> 'Tis the holely one. >> > > Do not imbibe from > Yellow tinted holes in snow > The huskies go there. > Frank Zappa was cool.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 22:58 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <1nvt6ga.1y4e984117kxb2N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704920 |
Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > On 9/27/2018 1:28 PM, Sn!pe wrote: [...] > > Do not imbibe from > > Yellow tinted holes in snow > > The huskies go there. > > > > Frank Zappa was cool. FZ was the coolest dude ever. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 18:15 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <pojobg$1a69$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704935 |
On 9/27/2018 4:58 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote: > >> On 9/27/2018 1:28 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > > [...] > >>> Do not imbibe from >>> Yellow tinted holes in snow >>> The huskies go there. >>> >> >> Frank Zappa was cool. > > FZ was the coolest dude ever. > I found one of his CDs in the garage, "Jazz from Hell" quite good, he was one heck of a guitar player too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 19:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <pojqkv$1dc2$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704920 |
On 9/27/2018 3:24 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/27/2018 1:28 PM, Sn!pe wrote: >> Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>>>> A haiku on oil >>>>> is a slippery thing to write. >>>>> zen.dog.bark.bark.bark. >>>>> >>>> >>>> When work must be done >>>> And you have only a drill >>>> Make another hole. >>>> >>> >>> Single hole in one. >>> Double hole in, and yet more. >>> 'Tis the holely one. >>> >> >> Do not imbibe from >> Yellow tinted holes in snow >> The huskies go there. >> > > Frank Zappa was cool. > TRUTH!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 19:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <poj9n8$mhp$65@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704850 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:01:17 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 04:43:16 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>On 9/26/2018 4:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >><MUSHROOM CLOUD!> >> >>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin >> >>Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >>different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >>formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of organisms. >>The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >>petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >>deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed and >>largely rejected. > > No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer > reviewed paper from Harvard. I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 15:13 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <slaqqdhc8ttii2o1jhre64r4vbvkldelkc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704911 |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Sep 201, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>On 9/26/2018 4:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>><MUSHROOM CLOUD!> >>> >>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin >>> >>>Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >>>different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >>>formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of organisms. >>>The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >>>petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >>>deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed and >>>largely rejected. >> >> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer >> reviewed paper from Harvard. > >I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a >layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing his IQ test administering skills. 147, 152, 160 Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 19:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <pojab0$mhp$68@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704914 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:13:35 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 201, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>On 9/26/2018 4:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>>><MUSHROOM CLOUD!> >>>> >>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin >>>> >>>>Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >>>>different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >>>>formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of >>>>organisms. >>>>The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >>>>petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >>>>deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed >>>>and largely rejected. >>> >>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer >>> reviewed paper from Harvard. >> >>I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a >>layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. > > My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing > his IQ test administering skills. > > 147, 152, 160 > > Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. And how much did you pay him to inflate those numbers, posthumper? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 13:23 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3616dc213e40ecb6989c20@reader.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #704915 |
In article <pojab0$mhp$68@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:13:35 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 201, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>On 9/26/2018 4:15 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > > > >>>><MUSHROOM CLOUD!> > >>>> > >>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin > >>>> > >>>>Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of > >>>>different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are > >>>>formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of > >>>>organisms. > >>>>The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all > >>>>petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the > >>>>deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed > >>>>and largely rejected. > >>> > >>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer > >>> reviewed paper from Harvard. > >> > >>I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a > >>layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. > > > > My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing > > his IQ test administering skills. > > > > 147, 152, 160 > > > > Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. > > And how much did you pay him to inflate those numbers, posthumper? Proof KoOk?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 15:26 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <v8bqqdt38up2g2fnr2k3q14bf2istpmian@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #704915 |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>On 9/26/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >>>>><MUSHROOM CLOUD!> >>>>> >>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin >>>>> >>>>>Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >>>>>different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >>>>>formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of >>>>>organisms. >>>>>The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >>>>>petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >>>>>deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed >>>>>and largely rejected. >>>> >>>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer >>>> reviewed paper from Harvard. >>> >>>I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a >>>layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. >> >> My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing >> his IQ test administering skills. >> >> 147, 152, 160 >> >> Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. > >And how much did you pay him to inflate those numbers, posthumper? Those numbers are what he came up with at the end of administering three different IQ tests. I found them very interesting. I have fond memories of one question in particular that tests memory efficiency. He read off a list of ten numbers and asked me to repeat in order as many as I could remember. I repeated them all back in order and correctly. He looked surprised and then upped the anti to fifteen numbers. I repeated them all back and in order. He shook his head and upped the anti to 20 and then to 30 and then to 40 and then to fifty. I repeated them all back in order and correctly. He said it wasn't possible and that I must be some kinda savant. I said, not necessarily as instead of remembering fifty numbers, I just remembered five groups of ten as I had no trouble remembering groups of 10. Mind over matter. A clear-thinking mind is a thing of beauty and that is why I make such a fuss when the likes of Skeeter and Checky ruin theirs with drugs. -- Yours Truly, Gregory Hall If a woman stumbles upon a fact that is opposed to her intuition she will tend to reject it outright and, even if the evidence is overwhelming, she will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, she has feelings that give her a reason to act in accordance with her intuition, she will embrace them as the Gospel. -- Capt. Neal ÂŪ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 12:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <bkg0lt.ns9.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #704922 |
On 2018-09-27 12:26 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> On 9/26/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>> >>>>>> <MUSHROOM CLOUD!> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin >>>>>> >>>>>> Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >>>>>> different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >>>>>> formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of >>>>>> organisms. >>>>>> The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >>>>>> petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >>>>>> deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed >>>>>> and largely rejected. >>>>> >>>>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer >>>>> reviewed paper from Harvard. >>>> >>>> I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a >>>> layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. >>> >>> My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing >>> his IQ test administering skills. >>> >>> 147, 152, 160 >>> >>> Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. >> >> And how much did you pay him to inflate those numbers, posthumper? > > Those numbers are what he came up with at the end of > administering three different IQ tests. I found them > very interesting. I have fond memories of one question > in particular that tests memory efficiency. He read off > a list of ten numbers and asked me to repeat in order > as many as I could remember. I repeated them all back > in order and correctly. He looked surprised and then > upped the anti to fifteen numbers. I repeated them all > back and in order. He shook his head and upped the anti > to 20 and then to 30 and then to 40 and then to fifty. > I repeated them all back in order and correctly. > > He said it wasn't possible and that I must be some kinda > savant. I said, not necessarily as instead of remembering > fifty numbers, I just remembered five groups of ten as > I had no trouble remembering groups of 10. > > Mind over matter. A clear-thinking mind is a thing of beauty > and that is why I make such a fuss when the likes of Skeeter > and Checky ruin theirs with drugs. > LOL , dope fiends that's all they are , i'm with you clear thinking is best
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 22:46 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <1nvt5v7.1rfkezs1fwh6taN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704922 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>>On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>On 9/26/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> > >>>>><MUSHROOM CLOUD!> > >>>>> > >>>>>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin > >>>>> > >>>>>Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of > >>>>>different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are > >>>>>formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of > >>>>>organisms. > >>>>>The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all > >>>>>petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the > >>>>>deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed > >>>>>and largely rejected. > >>>> > >>>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer > >>>> reviewed paper from Harvard. > >>> > >>>I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a > >>>layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. > >> > >> My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing > >> his IQ test administering skills. > >> > >> 147, 152, 160 > >> > >> Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. > > > >And how much did you pay him to inflate those numbers, posthumper? > > Those numbers are what he came up with at the end of > administering three different IQ tests. I found them > very interesting. I have fond memories of one question > in particular that tests memory efficiency. He read off > a list of ten numbers and asked me to repeat in order > as many as I could remember. I repeated them all back > in order and correctly. He looked surprised and then > upped the anti to fifteen numbers. I repeated them all > back and in order. He shook his head and upped the anti > to 20 and then to 30 and then to 40 and then to fifty. > I repeated them all back in order and correctly. > > He said it wasn't possible and that I must be some kinda > savant. I said, not necessarily as instead of remembering > fifty numbers, I just remembered five groups of ten as > I had no trouble remembering groups of 10. > > Mind over matter. A clear-thinking mind is a thing of beauty > and that is why I make such a fuss when the likes of Skeeter > and Checky ruin theirs with drugs. > I just checked your headers and could find nothing to hold against you. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 14:53 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <bkg92k.qqn.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #704930 |
On 2018-09-27 2:46 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> On 9/26/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> <MUSHROOM CLOUD!> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of >>>>>>> different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are >>>>>>> formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of >>>>>>> organisms. >>>>>>> The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all >>>>>>> petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the >>>>>>> deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed >>>>>>> and largely rejected. >>>>>> >>>>>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer >>>>>> reviewed paper from Harvard. >>>>> >>>>> I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a >>>>> layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. >>>> >>>> My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing >>>> his IQ test administering skills. >>>> >>>> 147, 152, 160 >>>> >>>> Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. >>> >>> And how much did you pay him to inflate those numbers, posthumper? >> >> Those numbers are what he came up with at the end of >> administering three different IQ tests. I found them >> very interesting. I have fond memories of one question >> in particular that tests memory efficiency. He read off >> a list of ten numbers and asked me to repeat in order >> as many as I could remember. I repeated them all back >> in order and correctly. He looked surprised and then >> upped the anti to fifteen numbers. I repeated them all >> back and in order. He shook his head and upped the anti >> to 20 and then to 30 and then to 40 and then to fifty. >> I repeated them all back in order and correctly. >> >> He said it wasn't possible and that I must be some kinda >> savant. I said, not necessarily as instead of remembering >> fifty numbers, I just remembered five groups of ten as >> I had no trouble remembering groups of 10. >> >> Mind over matter. A clear-thinking mind is a thing of beauty >> and that is why I make such a fuss when the likes of Skeeter >> and Checky ruin theirs with drugs. >> > > I just checked your headers and could find nothing to hold against you. > he's right though
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 23:06 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Oil is naturally refined fish poop. |
| Message-ID | <1nvt6qg.1wdzs15v2f7nyN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #704932 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-09-27 2:46 PM, Sn!pe wrote: > > Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote: > >> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, *Nag*degda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>>>>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, kuntsi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>>> On 9/26/2018, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>>> <MUSHROOM CLOUD!> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenic_petroleum_origin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Abiogenic petroleum origin is a term used to describe a number of > >>>>>>> different hypotheses which propose that petroleum and natural gas are > >>>>>>> formed by inorganic means rather than by the decomposition of > >>>>>>> organisms. > >>>>>>> The two principal abiogenic petroleum hypotheses, proposing that all > >>>>>>> petroleum is abiogenic, the deep gas hypothesis of Thomas Gold and the > >>>>>>> deep abiotic petroleum hypothesis, have been scientifically reviewed > >>>>>>> and largely rejected. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> No real astrophysicist would cite some dumb Wiki article over a peer > >>>>>> reviewed paper from Harvard. > >>>>> > >>>>> I guess she would if she was talking down to a complete ignoramus of a > >>>>> layperson, particularly one whose IQ was on the doltish side of normal. > >>>> > >>>> My IQ as measured by a Ph.D. in education back in the 70s who was honing > >>>> his IQ test administering skills. > >>>> > >>>> 147, 152, 160 > >>>> > >>>> Puts yours and kensi's to shame, no doubt. > >>> > >>> And how much did you pay him to inflate those numbers, posthumper? > >> > >> Those numbers are what he came up with at the end of > >> administering three different IQ tests. I found them > >> very interesting. I have fond memories of one question > >> in particular that tests memory efficiency. He read off > >> a list of ten numbers and asked me to repeat in order > >> as many as I could remember. I repeated them all back > >> in order and correctly. He looked surprised and then > >> upped the anti to fifteen numbers. I repeated them all > >> back and in order. He shook his head and upped the anti > >> to 20 and then to 30 and then to 40 and then to fifty. > >> I repeated them all back in order and correctly. > >> > >> He said it wasn't possible and that I must be some kinda > >> savant. I said, not necessarily as instead of remembering > >> fifty numbers, I just remembered five groups of ten as > >> I had no trouble remembering groups of 10. > >> > >> Mind over matter. A clear-thinking mind is a thing of beauty > >> and that is why I make such a fuss when the likes of Skeeter > >> and Checky ruin theirs with drugs. > >> > > > > I just checked your headers and could find nothing to hold against you. > > > he's right though Indeed, except he's made a mess of his homonyms again. I expect it's another one of his t0rllish traps. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web