Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread

Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Last post2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 251 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
                                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
                                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
                              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
            Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
              Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
                Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
                        Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
                            "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
                              Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
                                        BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
                                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
                                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
                                                        Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
                                                " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
                                                  Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
                                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
                                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
                                                    Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
                                                      Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
                                                        Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
                                                          Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
                                                        Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
                                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                                                      "kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
                                                        Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
                                                          "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
                                                            Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
                                                              You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
                                                                    India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
                                                                  The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                      Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
                                                                        Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
                                                                            Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
                                                                              Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
                                                                              Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
                                                                                Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
                                                                                  Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
                                                                                      Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
                                                                                            Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
                                                                                          Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
                                                                                        Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
                                                                          Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
                                                                      Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
                                                                            Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
                                                                              Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
                                                                Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
                                                                  Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
                                                                    Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
                                                                      Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
                                                                        Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
                                                                          Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
                                                              Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
                                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
                                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
                            Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
                              Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
                                Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
                                  Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
                                    Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
                                      Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
                                        Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
                                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
                          Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                        Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
                                    Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
                                      Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
                                  Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
                          Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
                            Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
                              Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
                                Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
                    Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
                      Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
                Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
                  Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
                          Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
                            Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
                  Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
                    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
                      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
                        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
              Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
                Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
        Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
    Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
      Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700

Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13  Next page →


#687302

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Message-ID<pedeu6$v0b$27@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687289
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:19:02 -0500, Bricked wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>melt!
>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
>>>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>>>>>melt!
>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>snowflakes, melt!
>>>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
>>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
>>>>>>>>>>> melt!
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
>>>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-
change-
>>is-
>>>>>>>>>having-
>>>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
>>>>>>>>>>>> starving!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair
>>>>>>>>>> of "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction
>>>>>>>>>> fueled by the billions of people overload on the planet?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
>>>>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms
>>>>>>>>>to move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
>>>>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care;
>>>>>>>>>results in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the
>>>>>>>>>women of the world will achieve the needed population reductions
>>>>>>>>>without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to
>>>>>>>>>be able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the
>>>>>>>>>world is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and
>>>>>>>>>overcrowded congested cities...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Wrong.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't
>>>>>>>> answer a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on
>>>>>>>> your maniacal murmurings.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for
>>>>>>certain.
>>>>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
>>>>> there,
>>>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
>>>>
>>>>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I
>>>>said women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
>>>>"Bricked"
>>>>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
>>>>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
>>>>autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a
>>>>misogynist who wants to control women.
>>> 
>>> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
>>
>>*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
>>
>>Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
> 
> Oh please, don't you ever shut up?

Not when my not-shutting-up is so productive in prompting lots of butthurt 
kookfroth from the likes of you.

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687318

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.35742c489d248ca3993b58@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687302
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <pedeu6$v0b$27@dont-email.me>, nad318b404
@gmail.invalid says...


> 
> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:19:02 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:21 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> > 
> >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >>On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:57:30 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 01:37:13 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>>melt!
> >>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:20:04 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:46:04 -0500, Bricked
> >>>>> <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 23:35:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >>>>>><nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>>>>>>melt!
> >>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:26:26 -0500, Bricked wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >>>>>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >>>>>>>>>snowflakes, melt!
> >>>>>>>>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt,
> >>>>>>>>>>> snowflakes,
> >>>>>>>>>>> melt!
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nutritious as carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> study suggests:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-
> change-
> >>is-
> >>>>>>>>>having-
> >>>>>>>>>>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians
> >>>>>>>>>>>> starving!
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
> >>>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fuck off, racist scum.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair
> >>>>>>>>>> of "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction
> >>>>>>>>>> fueled by the billions of people overload on the planet?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>It's been well established that affording women full rights,
> >>>>>>>>>including economic rights to work and own property and freedoms
> >>>>>>>>>to move about unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive
> >>>>>>>>>autonomy and ready access to contraception and health care;
> >>>>>>>>>results in a great reduction in birth rates. So liberating the
> >>>>>>>>>women of the world will achieve the needed population reductions
> >>>>>>>>>without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to
> >>>>>>>>>be able to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the
> >>>>>>>>>world is going to hell with extinctions, climate change, and
> >>>>>>>>>overcrowded congested cities...
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> You're Uncle Steve's wife.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Wrong.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle Steve you can't
> >>>>>>>> answer a civil question but you double-triple-quadruple down on
> >>>>>>>> your maniacal murmurings.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Another misogynist heard from.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>You're a self loathing white liberal whackadoodle that's for
> >>>>>>certain.
> >>>>>>Or you just play one in alt.checkrape.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I am still looking where you were misogynistic and shit. It's not
> >>>>> there,
> >>>>> Nads has been reduced to any old name calling.
> >>>>
> >>>>Then you need to look a little harder. Did you see the bit where I
> >>>>said women should be granted reproductive autonomy worldwide, and the
> >>>>"Bricked"
> >>>>kook characterized that as "maniacal murmurings"? Anyone who considers
> >>>>such a basic, egalitarian notion as everyone having reproductive
> >>>>autonomy over their own bodies as "maniacal murmurings" is a
> >>>>misogynist who wants to control women.
> >>> 
> >>> I don't want to control you just get outta my face bitch.
> >>
> >>*KAZZAAAAP!* *ffft*
> >>
> >>Oh, hell, not *another* one. I'm down to my last spare irony meter now!
> > 
> > Oh please, don't you ever shut up?
> 
> Not when my not-shutting-up is so productive in prompting lots of butthurt 
> kookfroth from the likes of you.

It was a major PKB anyway... his froth nozzle appears to be dribbling.  
It may be a bad packing gland, or else some butthurt.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687396

From"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>
Date2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Message-ID<u7ulgdpmet25h5aoorgrf2svq2g3hsh1b5@4ax.com>
In reply to#687318
On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:46:02 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:

<...>

>It may be a bad packing gland, or else some butthurt.

Oh my!  How ghey.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687427

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Message-ID<pefmit$ooj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687274
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sun, 27 May 2018 08:50:02 -0500, Bricked wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2018 06:58:32 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420
> <fnvw@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>egalitarian
> 
> egalitarian = communistic

Equality of opportunity isn't. It's just "not conservative". And it's in 
the Constitution. The founding fathers said everyone was created equal. 
(Ironically, some of them owned slaves, but the statement that everyone 
should be considered of equal moral weight still resonates.)

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687294

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.3573ca7990beaf00993b50@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687257
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <h3rjgdpthnl8stkfoj3cdi39sl9npi9taa@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
> >
> >> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >>> melt!
> >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
> >>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as
> >>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
> >having-
> >>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
> >>>>
> >>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
> >>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
> >>> 
> >>> Fuck off, racist scum.
> >>
> >> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
> >> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the
> >> billions of people overload on the planet?
> >
> >It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
> >economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
> >unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
> >access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
> >birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
> >population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
> >
> >But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
> >treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
> >hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...
> 
> You're Uncle Steve's wife. (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle
> Steve you can't answer a civil question but you
> double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal murmurings.

Uncle Steve once said he was going to piss on my grave when I died... so 
I've got THAT going for me.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687299

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Message-ID<luckgdhkrs7723p1e4td2r3i3f4gsqcjri@4ax.com>
In reply to#687294
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:48:42 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <h3rjgdpthnl8stkfoj3cdi39sl9npi9taa@4ax.com>, 
>bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>
>
>> 
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
>> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>> >>> melt!
>> >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
>> >>> 
>> >>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
>> >>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as
>> >>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
>> >having-
>> >>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
>> >>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
>> >>> 
>> >>> Fuck off, racist scum.
>> >>
>> >> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
>> >> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the
>> >> billions of people overload on the planet?
>> >
>> >It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
>> >economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
>> >unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
>> >access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
>> >birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
>> >population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
>> >
>> >But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
>> >treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
>> >hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...
>> 
>> You're Uncle Steve's wife. (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle
>> Steve you can't answer a civil question but you
>> double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal murmurings.
>
>Uncle Steve once said he was going to piss on my grave when I died... so 
>I've got THAT going for me.

It will make the weeds bloom.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687315

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.35742a636d84594b993b56@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687299
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <luckgdhkrs7723p1e4td2r3i3f4gsqcjri@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:48:42 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >Checkmate!  In article <h3rjgdpthnl8stkfoj3cdi39sl9npi9taa@4ax.com>, 
> >bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:24:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:56:49 -0400, benj wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 5/26/2018 3:59 PM, Nadegda wrote:
> >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
> >> >>> melt!
> >> >>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 11:30:36 -0400, benj wrote:
> >> >>> 
> >> >>>> On 5/26/2018 5:03 AM, kensi wrote:
> >> >>>>> Rice ? the staple food of billions ? will become less nutritious as
> >> >>>>> carbon dioxide (CO2) levels increase, a new study suggests:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> http://nationalpost.com/life/food/study-claims-climate-change-is-
> >> >having-
> >> >>> a-devastating-effect-on-the-nutrition-of-rice
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Oh my oh my it's worse than we thought! Billions of Asians starving!
> >> >>>> Oh wait. That's not worse...
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Fuck off, racist scum.
> >> >>
> >> >> Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "Kanzi" the pair of
> >> >> "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by the
> >> >> billions of people overload on the planet?
> >> >
> >> >It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
> >> >economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
> >> >unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
> >> >access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
> >> >birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
> >> >population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
> >> >
> >> >But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
> >> >treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
> >> >hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...
> >> 
> >> You're Uncle Steve's wife. (He posts in alt.slack)  Oh, and like Uncle
> >> Steve you can't answer a civil question but you
> >> double-triple-quadruple down on your maniacal murmurings.
> >
> >Uncle Steve once said he was going to piss on my grave when I died... so 
> >I've got THAT going for me.
> 
> It will make the weeds bloom.

But he may very well die before me, dashing all his hopes and dreams.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687273 — Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
SubjectMichael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.26--6.30pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#687243
Nadegda replied:
> > > > it's worse than we thought!  Billions of Asians starving!
> >
> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of
> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
> > the billions of people overload on the planet ?
> 
> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including 
> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about 
> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready 
> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction in 
> birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the needed 
> population reductions without resort to such horrific means as mass murder.
> 
> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able to 
> treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going to 
> hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested cities...

Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front,
while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal.

In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ",
she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden.

Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted 
from his parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure;
the eviction came immediately after he lost visitation rights.

CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months, 
if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course.

Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here,
because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
oddly, she's off the radar.

The Washington Post says:

  one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.  

  12.5 percent of women that age live at home. 

  Both numbers have increased dramatically in 
  recent decades, roughly doubling since 1960.  

  more young adults ages 18 to 34 were 
  living with their parents than with a spouse or partner, 
  the first time that's happened in at least 130 years.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687275 — Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
SubjectRe: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar.
Message-ID<ped25j$v0b$21@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687273
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:30:12 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> Nadegda replied:
>> > > > it's worse than we thought!  Billions of Asians starving!
>> >
>> > Wait a minute lefty hypocrite. Aren't you and "kensi" the pair of
>> > "feminists" trying to save us all from total destruction fueled by
>> > the billions of people overload on the planet ?
>> 
>> It's been well established that affording women full rights, including
>> economic rights to work and own property and freedoms to move about
>> unchaperoned; plus granting women full reproductive autonomy and ready
>> access to contraception and health care; results in a great reduction
>> in birth rates. So liberating the women of the world will achieve the
>> needed population reductions without resort to such horrific means as
>> mass murder.
>> 
>> But misogynists obstruct it at every turn, because they want to be able
>> to treat women as property. And then they wonder why the world is going
>> to hell with extinctions, climate change, and overcrowded congested
>> cities...
> 
> Women are doing all the work, on the feminist front,
> while I sit back and enjoy the benefits; it's almost criminal.
> 
> In Christina Aguilera's latest video, " Fall In Line ",
> she rejects sex and returns to The Garden of Eden.
> 
> Michael Rotondo, the 30 year old who famously got evicted from his
> parents' home, was avoiding child support, I'm sure; the eviction came
> immediately after he lost visitation rights.
> 
> CamSoda offered him 1,000$/month, for up to 6 months,
> if he'd livestream 24/7; he rejected it, of course.
> 
> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is main loser here,
> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> oddly, she's off the radar.
> 
> The Washington Post says:
> 
>   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> 
>   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> 
>   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades, roughly
>   doubling since 1960.
> 
>   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in at least
>   130 years.

Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687278 — Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
SubjectFort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.26--6.54pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#687275
Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> > oddly, she's off the radar.
> > 
> > The Washington Post says:
> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
> 
> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?

Same with the Eastern world, kook.

Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687281 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromMelzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com>
Date2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<8noOC.194534$I77.112687@fx44.am4>
In reply to#687278
On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
>> > 
>> > The Washington Post says:
>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>> 
>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>
> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>
> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
rarelly one can sepparate.

-- 
press any key to continue or any other to quit...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687283 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

From% <persent@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<ba9r4o.1gd.19.3@news.alt.net>
In reply to#687281
On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>>
>>>> The Washington Post says:
>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>>>
>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>
>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>
>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
> rarelly one can sepparate.
> 
but they all drive cadillacs

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687286 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<938kgdpdjgl8djs8j3m3btjqat9u80gscq@4ax.com>
In reply to#687283
On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Washington Post says:
>>>>>    one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>>>    12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>>>    Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>>>    more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>>>>>    with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>>
>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>>
>>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
>>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
>>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
>> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
>> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
>> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
>> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
>> rarelly one can sepparate.
>> 
>but they all drive cadillacs

I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687337 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

Frombenj <benj@nobody.net>
Date2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<eNAOC.318505$PE5.191650@fx37.iad>
In reply to#687286
On 5/26/2018 11:07 PM, Bricked wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 04:36:39 +0200, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2018-05-27 4:04 AM, Melzzzzz wrote:
>>> On 2018-05-27, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote:
>>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>>>> Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>>>> because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>>>> oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Washington Post says:
>>>>>>     one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>>>>     12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>>>>     Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>>>>     more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>>>>>>     with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130 years.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>>>
>>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>>>
>>>> Rents here, where I live, in Seattle, rise about 8% per year;
>>>> however, this is because people love big, exciting cities.
>>>> Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
>>> I think that prices of renting and real estates are artificially high,
>>> as here in Serbia no one can earn for apartment in lifetime for average
>>> wage. Eg you need around 1300 euros for square meter and average wage is
>>> around 300 euros. That is why people usually live with parents and very
>>> rarelly one can sepparate.
>>>
>> but they all drive cadillacs
> 
> I drive a Ford 150, a Lexus AND.. a Toyota.  Outta my way.
> 
Hey Nads! This is not one of your bullshit socialist countries.
THIS IS AMERICA! I don't think three cars is too many!

(I used to drive 4 but now I've only got 2)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687288 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<ped7t6$v0b$25@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687278
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:

> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
>> > 
>> > The Washington Post says:
>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130
>> >   years.
>> 
>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> 
> Same with the Eastern world, kook.

Who are you calling "kook", kook?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687290 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com>
In reply to#687288
On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
<nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:

>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
>>> > 
>>> > The Washington Post says:
>>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>>> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130
>>> >   years.
>>> 
>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>> 
>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>
>Who are you calling "kook", kook?

Shut up kook.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687293 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<MPG.3573c62af52051bc993b4e@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687290
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >
> >> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> >>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
> >>> > 
> >>> > The Washington Post says:
> >>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >>> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130
> >>> >   years.
> >>> 
> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> >> 
> >> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> >
> >Who are you calling "kook", kook?
> 
> Shut up kook.

Excellent retort.  I'm in awe.

No, really.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687301 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromBricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com>
Date2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<35dkgdlp6n79da2e3bufbs2jqbcujrem5u@4ax.com>
In reply to#687293
On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:30:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
>Checkmate!  In article <ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com>, 
>bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
>
>
>> 
>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> 
>> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> >
>> >> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>> >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>> >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>> >>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
>> >>> > 
>> >>> > The Washington Post says:
>> >>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>> >>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>> >>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>> >>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
>> >>> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130
>> >>> >   years.
>> >>> 
>> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
>> >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>> >> 
>> >> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>> >
>> >Who are you calling "kook", kook?
>> 
>> Shut up kook.
>
>Excellent retort.  I'm in awe.
>
>No, really.

Take your meds now and morning time, at the most you'll think you had
a bad dream where you were beaten to death with no.2 pencils.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687319 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<MPG.35742d95216a47f3993b5b@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#687301
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <35dkgdlp6n79da2e3bufbs2jqbcujrem5u@4ax.com>, 
bricked@barkingspiders.com says...


> 
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 20:30:22 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
> >Checkmate!  In article <ot8kgd9onf6l8jtss47k9v3mhbb8keuuoh@4ax.com>, 
> >bricked@barkingspiders.com says...
> >
> >
> >> 
> >> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
> >> >On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
> >> >>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
> >> >>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
> >> >>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
> >> >>> > 
> >> >>> > The Washington Post says:
> >> >>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
> >> >>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
> >> >>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
> >> >>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents than
> >> >>> >   with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in 130
> >> >>> >   years.
> >> >>> 
> >> >>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive housing-
> >> >>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
> >> >> 
> >> >> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
> >> >
> >> >Who are you calling "kook", kook?
> >> 
> >> Shut up kook.
> >
> >Excellent retort.  I'm in awe.
> >
> >No, really.
> 
> Take your meds now and morning time, at the most you'll think you had
> a bad dream where you were beaten to death with no.2 pencils.

I dreamed a Chihuahua was trying to hump my leg.

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#687303 — Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.

FromNadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
Date2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
SubjectRe: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican.
Message-ID<pedevu$v0b$28@dont-email.me>
In reply to#687290
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Sat, 26 May 2018 22:19:49 -0500, Bricked wrote:

> On Sun, 27 May 2018 03:15:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda
> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>>On Sat, 26 May 2018 18:54:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>
>>> Nadegda replied ( to me ):
>>>> > Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is the main loser here,
>>>> > because she has to deal with the 8 year old;
>>>> > oddly, she's off the radar.
>>>> > 
>>>> > The Washington Post says:
>>>> >   one in five men ages 25 to 34 lived in their parents' home.
>>>> >   12.5 percent of women that age live at home.
>>>> >   Both numbers have increased dramatically in recent decades.
>>>> >   more young adults ages 18 to 34 were living with their parents
>>>> >   than with a spouse or partner, the first time that's happened in
>>>> >   130 years.
>>>> 
>>>> Perhaps it's escaped your notice, kook, that there's a massive
>>>> housing-
>>>> affordability crisis going on throughout most of the western world?
>>> 
>>> Same with the Eastern world, kook.
>>
>>Who are you calling "kook", kook?
> 
> Shut up kook.

Why don't you come over here and make me, kook?

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3 4 … 13  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web