Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #685760 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 149 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-16 10:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 10:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 18:46 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 12:17 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-16 20:41 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 13:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 15:57 -0700
An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 14:15 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-18 19:32 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-18 20:16 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. OT de chucka <Dechucka1@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-19 10:25 +1000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-18 22:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 19:16 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:02 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-19 12:09 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:44 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:28 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 03:37 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-18 20:42 -0700
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:07 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-19 12:35 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 12:40 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-19 22:22 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-19 21:34 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-20 03:15 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:18 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:38 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:42 +0000
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-31 17:26 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-02 11:27 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:45 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-04 09:26 -0400
Re: An Actual Ph.D. Ecologist scientist spanks all climate fraudsters. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 15:05 +0100
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 16:42 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 00:30 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:34 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-17 05:07 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:48 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-16 17:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 22:44 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-17 12:34 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-17 10:01 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-05-17 12:10 -0500
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-17 13:28 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-17 19:49 +0000
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-20 10:52 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 12:23 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-20 12:26 -0400
"Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 10:01 -0700
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-20 23:38 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-21 00:11 -0400
Re: "Sex at Dawn" by Chris Ryan. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 04:33 +0000
Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-20 23:33 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 07:22 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:10 -0400
Nature herself punishes perverts. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-21 09:33 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:03 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:04 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:29 +0000
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 15:47 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-21 19:14 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 16:16 -0700
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 20:19 -0400
Re: Nature herself punishes perverts. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-21 09:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-21 09:31 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-21 12:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 19:05 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-21 13:05 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:24 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 16:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-21 21:30 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Gregory Hall condems himself. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-24 10:14 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:21 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:31 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-05-24 22:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-24 16:01 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:50 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-05-24 18:07 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:51 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:37 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:40 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-25 11:08 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 17:45 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:53 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:41 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-26 11:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:47 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:32 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Leo Sgouros <adravirgo@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 10:55 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 20:25 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-25 00:09 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 00:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 04:49 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:42 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-25 05:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 00:03 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 10:57 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 11:24 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:55 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-25 12:41 -0600
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 21:50 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:15 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-25 22:16 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:34 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 03:41 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 06:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:14 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:57 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:50 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:11 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:58 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:54 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:28 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:27 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:34 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:39 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:47 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 02:00 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:32 +0000
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:29 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-05-25 07:49 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:58 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 13:58 -0400
We can't help them, the damage has been done. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-25 11:41 -0700
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-21 12:07 -0400
Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-24 09:49 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:26 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:44 -0600
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-20 13:03 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-24 11:01 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-24 13:27 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-25 15:26 -0700
Re: John Oliver is the best climate change reporter on television benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-16 14:14 -0400
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 20:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <vKINC.118415$wG5.103483@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #686936 |
On 5/24/2018 1:32 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <fjubgdpm263q382gped5jer9ja5bj14tiv@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > >> >> On Mon, 21 May 2018 12:37:11 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 5/21/2018 9:08 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> >>> [snip massive doses of racism and Islamophobia] >>> >>>> Despite living on a continent which is almost completely inhospitable >>>> to the human race due to its many diseases, infertile lands and harsh >>>> climate, Africans >>> >>> That's a strange way to describe the continent on which humans *evolved >>> in the first place*, and whose grasslands we replicate wherever we >>> travel, "terraforming" suburbs and city parks into mini Kenyas. >> >> Sadly, evolution is only a theory. There is no definitive >> proof evolution created humans. Some physicist you are, >> woman! You confuse theory with fact. You claim God and >> religion are smoke and mirrors but your theory of evolution >> is even more the purview of magicians. > > Evolution is a pretty convincing theory, with lots of evidence to back it > up. What have you got? Some fanciful fairy tales in a book written by > men two thousand years ago, with no evidence of any kind to support their > claims. > So why are you trying to create a debate between science and religion. That is not the issue at all. The issue would be if the theory of evolution is "fact". To say that is true is to say that science is a religion and it is not.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 00:09 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pe829r$cpo$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #686936 |
On 5/24/2018 1:32 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <fjubgdpm263q382gped5jer9ja5bj14tiv@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > > >> >> On Mon, 21 May 2018 12:37:11 -0400, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 5/21/2018 9:08 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> >>> [snip massive doses of racism and Islamophobia] >>> >>>> Despite living on a continent which is almost completely inhospitable >>>> to the human race due to its many diseases, infertile lands and harsh >>>> climate, Africans >>> >>> That's a strange way to describe the continent on which humans *evolved >>> in the first place*, and whose grasslands we replicate wherever we >>> travel, "terraforming" suburbs and city parks into mini Kenyas. >> >> Sadly, evolution is only a theory. There is no definitive >> proof evolution created humans. Some physicist you are, >> woman! You confuse theory with fact. You claim God and >> religion are smoke and mirrors but your theory of evolution >> is even more the purview of magicians. > > Evolution is a pretty convincing theory, with lots of evidence to back it > up. What have you got? Some fanciful fairy tales in a book written by > men two thousand years ago, with no evidence of any kind to support their > claims. Fake news. Try to keep up. These are scientists you're dealing with. They're in it for the money. You know how them PhD guys operate. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 00:32 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pe7ljf$cal$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686896 |
On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:01:21 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Mon, 21 May 2018 12:37:11 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>On 5/21/2018 9:08 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >> >>[snip massive doses of racism and Islamophobia] >> >>> Despite living on a continent which is almost completely inhospitable >>> to the human race due to its many diseases, infertile lands and harsh >>> climate, Africans >> >>That's a strange way to describe the continent on which humans *evolved >>in the first place*, and whose grasslands we replicate wherever we >>travel, "terraforming" suburbs and city parks into mini Kenyas. > > Sadly, evolution is only a theory. No it's not. The _theory_ of evolution is an attempt to scientifically describe the mechanism behind the _observed fact_ of evolution. Man, are you kooky! -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-24 21:52 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <70KNC.101492$mD.47679@fx31.iad> |
| In reply to | #686981 |
On 5/24/2018 8:32 PM, vallor wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:01:21 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 May 2018 12:37:11 -0400, kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 5/21/2018 9:08 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>> >>> [snip massive doses of racism and Islamophobia] >>> >>>> Despite living on a continent which is almost completely inhospitable >>>> to the human race due to its many diseases, infertile lands and harsh >>>> climate, Africans >>> >>> That's a strange way to describe the continent on which humans *evolved >>> in the first place*, and whose grasslands we replicate wherever we >>> travel, "terraforming" suburbs and city parks into mini Kenyas. >> >> Sadly, evolution is only a theory. > > No it's not. > > The _theory_ of evolution is an attempt to scientifically describe the > mechanism behind the _observed fact_ of evolution. > > Man, are you kooky! There are "facts" of evolution not "fact". Evolution is NOT "fact". evolution is just a theory. Your "Fact" of evolution is the religion of you liberal atheist fundies. Real science has no place for any idiot fundies left or right.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 04:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pe84lb$l9u$21@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686996 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Thu, 24 May 2018 21:52:55 -0400, benj glanced in the mirror, freaked out, and yelled: > idiot fundies <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 10:42 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <UhVNC.206832$yc1.24412@fx40.iad> |
| In reply to | #687006 |
On 5/25/2018 12:49 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Thu, 24 May 2018 21:52:55 -0400, benj glanced in the mirror, freaked > out, and yelled: > >> idiot fundies > > <snicker> > Taking about YOU, Nads! Chortle (Rule #5) Hey Nads, did your pointy little head ever figure out what Rule #5 refers to? Didn't think so. Idiot Lib fundie!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 05:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pe879d$o0v$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #686996 |
On Thu, 24 May 2018 21:52:55 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/24/2018 8:32 PM, vallor wrote: >> On Thu, 24 May 2018 11:01:21 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 21 May 2018 12:37:11 -0400, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 5/21/2018 9:08 AM, Doomsdrzej wrote: >>>> >>>> [snip massive doses of racism and Islamophobia] >>>> >>>>> Despite living on a continent which is almost completely >>>>> inhospitable to the human race due to its many diseases, infertile >>>>> lands and harsh climate, Africans >>>> >>>> That's a strange way to describe the continent on which humans >>>> *evolved in the first place*, and whose grasslands we replicate >>>> wherever we travel, "terraforming" suburbs and city parks into mini >>>> Kenyas. >>> >>> Sadly, evolution is only a theory. >> >> No it's not. >> >> The _theory_ of evolution is an attempt to scientifically describe the >> mechanism behind the _observed fact_ of evolution. >> >> Man, are you kooky! > > There are "facts" of evolution not "fact". Evolution is NOT "fact". > evolution is just a theory. Your "Fact" of evolution is the religion of > you liberal atheist fundies. Real science has no place for any idiot > fundies left or right. Scientists observe evolution in the lab all the time. Do you know how much we've mutated fruit flies? Read and learn, kooky: https://www.nature.com/news/flies-reared-in-the-dark-for-60-years-give-up- their-genetic-secrets-1.19339 -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 00:03 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <YGNNC.118419$wG5.16931@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #687010 |
On 5/24/2018 11:34 PM, vallor wrote: > > Scientists observe evolution in the lab all the time. > Do you know how much we've mutated fruit flies? To the point that they are no longer fruit flies?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 10:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <IvVNC.55917$p05.54006@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #687011 |
On 5/25/2018 2:03 AM, Just Wondering wrote: > On 5/24/2018 11:34 PM, vallor wrote: >> >> Scientists observe evolution in the lab all the time. Do you know how >> much we've mutated fruit flies? > > To the point that they are no longer fruit flies? > The observed fact that evolution is seen to work in certain limited simple cases does NOT justify the extrapolation to saying it is the primary cause of ALL creation. And there is even less justification for then passing laws to teach that extrapolation as absolute "fact". Teaching that simple organisms cam genetically adapt to their environment is one thing. Teaching that humans "evolved" from rocks is quite another. Lib fundies have adopted evolution as their state religion and try to promote it whenever they can. In this country state religions are illegal.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 11:24 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <mFXNC.12338$Kp4.9952@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #687041 |
On 5/25/2018 8:57 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/25/2018 2:03 AM, Just Wondering wrote: >> On 5/24/2018 11:34 PM, vallor wrote: >>> >>> Scientists observe evolution in the lab all the time. Do you >>> know how much we've mutated fruit flies? >> >> To the point that they are no longer fruit flies? >> > > The observed fact that evolution is seen to work in certain limited > simple cases does NOT justify the extrapolation to saying it is the > primary cause of ALL creation. And there is even less justification for > then passing laws to teach that extrapolation as absolute "fact". > Teaching that simple organisms cam genetically adapt to their > environment is one thing. Teaching that humans "evolved" from rocks is > quite another. The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, or merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in the lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is whether the former, the actual evolution of one species into a separate and distinct species, has ever been observed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 13:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pe9ilq$11ki$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #687061 |
On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of > species, or merely adaptation within a species, that has > been observed in the lab. No one denies that species can > adapt. The question is whether the former, the actual > evolution of one species into a separate and distinct > species, has ever been observed. And the answer is "yes": https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real thing." -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 12:41 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <wNYNC.151973$o43.73018@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #687067 |
On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of >> species, or merely adaptation within a species, that has >> been observed in the lab. No one denies that species can >> adapt. The question is whether the former, the actual >> evolution of one species into a separate and distinct >> species, has ever been observed. > > And the answer is "yes": > > https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ > > "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one > species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real thing." It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the definition of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of "species".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 21:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pea0g2$l9u$23@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687072 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, or >>> merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in the >>> lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is whether >>> the former, the actual evolution of one species into a separate and >>> distinct species, has ever been observed. >> >> And the answer is "yes": >> >> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ >> >> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one >> species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real >> thing." > > It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the definition > of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. > Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of > "species". That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt creationist kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable debating tactic of goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 15:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35722af734993ca1993b30@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #687102 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pea0g2$l9u$23@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > > > On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: > >> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >> > >>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, or > >>> merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in the > >>> lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is whether > >>> the former, the actual evolution of one species into a separate and > >>> distinct species, has ever been observed. > >> > >> And the answer is "yes": > >> > >> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ > >> > >> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one > >> species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real > >> thing." > > > > It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the definition > > of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. > > Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of > > "species". > > That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt creationist > kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable debating tactic of > goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. No-True-Goal-posting, too. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 22:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <pea207$l9u$29@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687102 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:01:53 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2018 21:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >> >>> On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> >>>>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, >>>>> or merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in the >>>>> lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is whether >>>>> the former, the actual evolution of one species into a separate and >>>>> distinct species, has ever been observed. >>>> >>>> And the answer is "yes": >>>> >>>> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ >>>> >>>> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one >>>> species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real >>>> thing." >>> >>> It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the >>> definition of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. >>> Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of >>> "species". >> >>That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt creationist >>kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable debating tactic of >>goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. > > The fact is you really don't know if we were created or climbed out of > the muck. Actually, I do. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 20:15 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <RG1OC.250944$DS3.239657@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #687109 |
On 5/25/2018 6:16 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:01:53 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 May 2018 21:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, >>>>>> or merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in the >>>>>> lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is whether >>>>>> the former, the actual evolution of one species into a separate and >>>>>> distinct species, has ever been observed. >>>>> >>>>> And the answer is "yes": >>>>> >>>>> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ >>>>> >>>>> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one >>>>> species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real >>>>> thing." >>>> >>>> It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the >>>> definition of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. >>>> Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of >>>> "species". >>> >>> That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt creationist >>> kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable debating tactic of >>> goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. >> >> The fact is you really don't know if we were created or climbed out of >> the muck. > > Actually, I do. > Actually you mean "I did".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-25 20:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35726e3e63ac9628993b40@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #687109 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pea207$l9u$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:01:53 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 May 2018 21:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > > > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >>On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: > >> > >>> On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: > >>>> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, > >>>>> or merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in the > >>>>> lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is whether > >>>>> the former, the actual evolution of one species into a separate and > >>>>> distinct species, has ever been observed. > >>>> > >>>> And the answer is "yes": > >>>> > >>>> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ > >>>> > >>>> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one > >>>> species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real > >>>> thing." > >>> > >>> It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the > >>> definition of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. > >>> Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of > >>> "species". > >> > >>That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt creationist > >>kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable debating tactic of > >>goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. > > > > The fact is you really don't know if we were created or climbed out of > > the muck. > > Actually, I do. In an Occam's Razor sort of way... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 11:34 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <C8fOC.13109$Kp4.12829@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #687147 |
On 5/25/2018 11:03 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pea207$l9u$29@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:01:53 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 21:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, >>>>>>> or merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in the >>>>>>> lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is whether >>>>>>> the former, the actual evolution of one species into a separate and >>>>>>> distinct species, has ever been observed. >>>>>> >>>>>> And the answer is "yes": >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ >>>>>> >>>>>> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which one >>>>>> species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a real >>>>>> thing." >>>>> >>>>> It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the >>>>> definition of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. >>>>> Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of >>>>> "species". >>>> >>>> That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt creationist >>>> kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable debating tactic of >>>> goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. >>> >>> The fact is you really don't know if we were created or climbed out of >>> the muck. >> >> Actually, I do. > > In an Occam's Razor sort of way... > Come on Checkmate, don't you have to admire a person with a faith in their religion as strong as Nads is?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 03:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <peal0n$lr5$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687109 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:26:34 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2018 22:16:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:01:53 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 21:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>melt! >>>>On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of species, >>>>>>> or merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in >>>>>>> the lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is >>>>>>> whether the former, the actual evolution of one species into a >>>>>>> separate and distinct species, has ever been observed. >>>>>> >>>>>> And the answer is "yes": >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ >>>>>> >>>>>> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which >>>>>> one species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a >>>>>> real thing." >>>>> >>>>> It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the >>>>> definition of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. >>>>> Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of >>>>> "species". >>>> >>>>That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt >>>>creationist kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable >>>>debating tactic of goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. >>> >>> The fact is you really don't know if we were created or climbed out of >>> the muck. >> >>Actually, I do. > > Then state what it is and show proof. #include <std_evolution_textbook.h> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-26 06:39 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Porn and a rubber pussy is the LeastBad option. |
| Message-ID | <peavfq$lr5$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687148 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 25 May 2018 23:56:42 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2018 03:41:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:26:34 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 22:16:39 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>melt! >>>>On Fri, 25 May 2018 16:01:53 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 25 May 2018 21:50:59 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>>>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>melt! >>>>>>On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:41:33 -0600, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/25/2018 11:55 AM, kensi wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/25/2018 1:24 PM, Just Wondering wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The point behind my question is whether it's evolution of >>>>>>>>> species, >>>>>>>>> or merely adaptation within a species, that has been observed in >>>>>>>>> the lab. No one denies that species can adapt. The question is >>>>>>>>> whether the former, the actual evolution of one species into a >>>>>>>>> separate and distinct species, has ever been observed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And the answer is "yes": >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/lab-experiment-speciation/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "A groundbreaking lab experiment proves that speciation, in which >>>>>>>> one species splits into two distinct ones, is most definitely a >>>>>>>> real thing." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It looks more like someone is playing fast and loose with the >>>>>>> definition of a new species. That wouldn't be surprising. >>>>>>> Biologists don't even have a universally accepted definition of >>>>>>> "species". >>>>>> >>>>>>That's funny, because to me it looks more like some butthurt >>>>>>creationist kook is playing fast and loose with the questionable >>>>>>debating tactic of goalpost-moving and no-true-Scotsmanning. >>>>> >>>>> The fact is you really don't know if we were created or climbed out >>>>> of the muck. >>>> >>>>Actually, I do. >>> >>> Then state what it is and show proof. >> >>#include <std_evolution_textbook.h> > > So you can't prove it, but we knew that. The proof was incorporated into the previous document by reference. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web