Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #565765 > unrolled thread

The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 10:06 -0700
    Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-27 06:34 +0200
      Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-26 22:35 -0700
        Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-27 18:24 +0200
          Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 10:08 -0700
            the fOAh noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 13:43 -0700
            Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 08:19 +0200
              Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 23:42 -0700
                Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 18:43 +0200
                  Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:23 -0700
                    Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:30 +0200
          Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-03-27 18:14 -0500
            Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 16:23 -0700
              plus nineteen noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-27 19:40 -0700
            Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 07:07 +0200
              Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 08:13 -0700
                Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-28 18:12 +0200
                  Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:21 -0700
                    Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:50 -0700
                    Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 07:14 +0200
                      Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 23:00 -0700
                        Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-29 19:21 +0200
                          Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-29 14:22 -0600
                            Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Mustaffa Sheboygan <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-03-29 18:13 -0700
                              Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-29 18:32 -0700
                  Re: The weather regions are directly connected to the Sun Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-28 13:16 -0600
                Snell's laW etc. ad vomitorium noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-03-28 10:16 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#566422

On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:25:08 PM UTC-7, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

> > You mean the experiment that has already been done tens of thousands
> > of times the details of which you refuse to present/discuss?
> 
> Oh, but I have presented the results of those experiments, 

Who cares.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566496

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

James McGinn, in
<news:5480fddb-fb83-4266-949d-6473f53205b0@googlegroups.com> did
thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again:

> On Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:25:08 PM UTC-7,
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus wrote:

>>> You mean the experiment that has already been done tens of thousands
>>> of times the details of which you refuse to present/discuss?

>> Oh, but I have presented the results of those experiments, James. I
>> even did that math for you. You rejected it all because you reject all
>> of reality.
>> 
>> Thus, the only proof you'll apparently accept is from yourself. So you
>> cannot run from doing those simple experiments. To do so means your
>> tacit admission that you know you're wrong, and that you're too
>> cowardly to admit it. Because everyone including you knows the
>> experiments will null your moronic blather.
>> 
>> Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a 
>> lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating 
>> that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself 
>> if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia? 
>> Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and 
>> help you to not piss all over yourself?
>> 
>> And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a 
>> pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser.
>> 
>> How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient 
>> tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't 
>> you explain that, James?
>> 
>> Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your 
>> claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James?
>> 
>> Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your 
>> delusions, James?
>> 
>> Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process, 
>> James?
>> 
>> Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions, 
>> James?
>> 
>> Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being 
>> *deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James?
>> 
>> Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as 
>> "delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James?
>> 
>> Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in 
>> which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of 
>> education about now, James?
>> 
>> Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out 
>> of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been 
>> deemed mentally incompetent, James?
>> 
>> Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class 
>> as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist", 
>> James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated, 
>> whereas you're ignorant and uneducated?
>> 
>> What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was 
>> the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James?
>> 
>> Why are you not taking your meds, James?
>> 
>> Why are you *still* running away from answering those tough questions 
>> in my .sig which highlight the logical inconsistencies and 
>> contradictions in your moronic "theory not-a-theory", James?

> Who cares.

Nobody cares, Jim. Nobody cares about you, nobody cares about your
moronic delusional blather. You're a pathetic joke. People the world
over point and laugh at you as you blather on about your fata morgana
of a "theory". You're a blundering backpedaling boob, too stupid to be
properly embarrassed for yourself, and far too insane to ever figure
out reality. Your misconstrual of scientific fact is akin to a 5 year
old's obvious lies. Your paranoia and ever-encroaching schizophrenia
added to the mix make you the most pathetic dimwit ever to fancy
himself a physicist. Go tell your mommy what an idiot you've been, and
have her give you your meds, you sad sorry sack of stupid shit.

-- 

Here, James, at the very least, try to address those tough questions
which spotlight the logical inconsistencies and contradictions
inherent in your "theory":

============================================================
Why are you known as Tardnado McGinn, the delusional moronic ignorant
uneducated psychotic babbling loon, James?

Why have you been legally deemed to be mentally incompetent and a
lifelong ward of your parents James, Sr. and Constance, necessitating
that you live with your parents because you'd be a danger to yourself
if you lived independently, James? Is it your paranoid schizophrenia?
Is that why your mommy has to feed you, dress you, wipe your ass and
help you to not piss all over yourself?

And you call yourself a scientist, James? You're nothing more than a
pathetic basement-dwelling schizo-brained delusional loser.

Anders Nilsson measured (https://youtu.be/7hGqlEpvODw?t=2156) a
spectral peak that was not solid-phase nor liquid-phase water, James.
You claim that water remains liquid-phase upon evaporation. What was
Anders Nilsson measuring, James? Oh, that's right... gaseous phase
water, thereby proving that evaporation entails a phase change,
thereby proving latent heat of evaporation exists, thereby
*dis*proving a gigantic chunk of your theory, James.

You make a supposition that a "plasma not-a-plasma" is created from
water due to wind shear, which transports energy throughout the
atmosphere via wind driven by that plasma. Where does the energy come
from to create your "wind shear" to create your "plasma not-a-plasma"
if the "plasma not-a-plasma" cannot exist and thereby "transport
energy" by driving that wind to create the "wind shear" which creates
your "plasma not-a-plasma", unless there is "wind shear" to begin
with, James? Your logic is so twisted you're going in circles. You've
created a circulus in probando causality dilemma, which utterly
destroys your theory, James.

According to your "theory", electrostatic attraction *increases* with
distance (in violation of Coulomb's Law), which means that when an
electron falls in orbit, it has to *absorb* energy. And that higher
energy level somehow translates into a *weaker* electrostatic
attraction. Now let's look at the other side of the coin... the
electron in orbit would give off energy, rise in orbit, and somehow,
that *lower* energy level translates into a *stronger* electrostatic
attraction... how's *that* work, James? Explain how you've not just
violated the Law of Conservation of Energy on an atomic level.

You've yet again slapped a patch on your theory, abandoning Coulomb's
Law for a separate "mechanism" by which electrstatic attraction
increases with increasing distance. How does your "mechanism" and
electrostatic attraction in accordance with Coulomb's Law not mutually
cancel, thereby dissociating all water, James?

How do your "jet stream vortices" travel potentially hundreds of miles
away from your "jet stream / giant tornado in the sky", without
detection by satellite *or* Doppler radar, and know where and when to
touch down so they always hit only cumulonimbus clouds, rather than
tornadoes randomly appearing out of the clear blue sky or from other
types of clouds, James? Is your "jet stream / giant tornado in the
sky" sentient, James?

Go on, Jim, tell us... *why* is there a "boundary" between the
troposphere and the stratosphere... we're waiting, Jim... No answer,
Jim? Is it because that's where your "sentient jet stream / giant
tornado monster with noodly appendages" lives, and it likes it that
way, Jim? Do you need your meds, Jim?

How does a hot air balloon work, James? No plasma, no giant sentient
tornado monster in the jet stream... how does it rise, Jim? Why can't
you explain that, James?

Why does water freeze from the top down, even if the heat sink is
*below* the container of water? That's another question your "theory
not-a-theory" can't answer.

Why can't you provide the explanation and mathematics to prove your
claim that humid air is heavier than dry air, James?

Why can't you explain or mathematically model even *one* of your
delusions, James?

Why can't you get your delusions through the peer-review process,
James?

Why can't you even get your delusion on a pre-print server, James?

Why are there *no* corroborating studies backing up your delusions,
James?

Why are you shunned by the scientific community, James?

Why is your blather on the comments sections of websites being
*deleted*, dismissed as the mad barking of a loon, James?

Why are you described in the reviews of the "books" you've written as
"delusional", "insane", and a "conspiracy theorist", James?

Why did you *fail* *out* of an elective Basic Meteorology class, in
which they teach the very concepts you're blathering out your lack of
education about now, James?

Why do you so hate meteorologists, James? Is it because you failed out
of the elective Basic Meteorology class because you've legally been
deemed mentally incompetent, James?

Why do you use your failing out of an elective Basic Meteorology class
as the basis to claim yourself to be a "physicist not-a-physicist",
James? Do you not understand that physicists are highly educated,
whereas you're ignorant and uneducated?

What universities did you attend, what were your majors and what was
the topic of your Ph.D. thesis, James? You don't have a Ph.D? Then
you're not a physicist, James. LOL

If, as you claim, the jet stream is a vortex, why is the ride while
inside the jet stream so smooth, James? Have you never ridden in an
airplane inside a jet stream, James? Is it just that your "sentient
jet stream / giant tornado monster with noodly appendages" likes its
back scratched by the aircraft, so it doesn't rip the aircraft to
shreds, Jim?

Do you not understand that once the air going upward through the
tornadic funnel reaches the cumulonimbus cloud base above the
mesocyclone, it spreads out, thus the tornado is strictly a phenomenon
which happens from cloud base to ground? It does *not* go from the
ground all the way up through the cloud to the tropopause as you
claim, James, and it most certainly does not continue for potentially
thousands of miles in the upper troposphere to join the jet stream,
which would make air travel deadly.

Explain why the jets run easterly, whereas the dry line runs N-S, if
the jets are powering the creation of tornadoes. How is a tornado
being created hundreds of miles from the edge of the jets, James?

Which direction does air flow from a flame, Jim? Up, does it not?
That's convection due to temperature-induced density differential, is
it not? Which direction does air flow from a flame in zero gravity,
James? Radially in all directions, thereby snuffing out the flame due
to lack of oxygen. So your claiming that convection doesn't exist
means you're further claiming that gravity does not exist, and fire
cannot burn for very long before it is smothered due to lack of
oxygen. Or were you not aware that convection is a gravity-induced
phenomenon due to density differential, James?

How are your atmospheric "water droplets" forming if they're plasma,
Jim?

Do you not know that water droplets *minimize* surface area, James?
How are your "plasma not-a-plasma" "water droplets" *maximizing* their
surface area as you claim?

Do you not know what the definition of "plasma" is, James?

How is your "plasma not-a-plasma" (which you have admitted is a
hypothetical construct in a failed attempt to lend your claims even a
semblance of plausibility) forming if the nuclear binding energy and
dissociation energy of water are identical, and thus the water will
preferentially dissociate into hydrogen and oxygen unless hit with an
extremely energetic laser, Jim?

Where is the energy (equivalent to photons of 103.32 nm wavelength,
extremely strong ultraviolet, just 3.32 nm away from x-rays... except
photons with shorter wavelength than 121 nm are absorbed high above
the troposphere because they ionize air so well) coming from in the
troposphere to form your "plasma not-a-plasma", Jim?

How is the energy to plasmize your "plasma not-a-plasma" not
dissociating all water on the planet and killing all life on the
planet given that the energy *must* be in the troposphere where nearly
all the water is, and where all life is, Jim?

Now that it's been proven that water molecule polarity doesn't change
upon H bonding (which would have side effects such as random changes
in the solvent properties of water... and we know those properties do
not randomly change, Jim), and in fact the two spin isomers of water
molecules account for the different H bonding strengths which account
for evaporation and condensation, do you still contend that your
implausible claims are workable, Jim?

Why are you not taking your meds, James?
============================================================

Why can't you answer those questions, Jim?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566534

On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:21:56 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>Nobody cares, Jim. Nobody cares about you, nobody cares about your
>moronic delusional blather. You're a pathetic joke. People the world
>over point and laugh at you as you blather on about your fata morgana
>of a "theory". You're a blundering backpedaling boob, too stupid to be
>properly embarrassed for yourself, and far too insane to ever figure
>out reality. Your misconstrual of scientific fact is akin to a 5 year
>old's obvious lies. Your paranoia and ever-encroaching schizophrenia
>added to the mix make you the most pathetic dimwit ever to fancy
>himself a physicist. Go tell your mommy what an idiot you've been, and
>have her give you your meds, you sad sorry sack of stupid shit.


That's an awful lot of foam coming from someone who "doesn't care".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566559

In article <mvolfbtciorfug09jrjmtli1ckclq594tv@4ax.com>, 
invalid@invalid.invalid says...


> 
> On Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:21:56 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
> Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:
> 
> >Nobody cares, Jim. Nobody cares about you, nobody cares about your
> >moronic delusional blather. You're a pathetic joke. People the world
> >over point and laugh at you as you blather on about your fata morgana
> >of a "theory". You're a blundering backpedaling boob, too stupid to be
> >properly embarrassed for yourself, and far too insane to ever figure
> >out reality. Your misconstrual of scientific fact is akin to a 5 year
> >old's obvious lies. Your paranoia and ever-encroaching schizophrenia
> >added to the mix make you the most pathetic dimwit ever to fancy
> >himself a physicist. Go tell your mommy what an idiot you've been, and
> >have her give you your meds, you sad sorry sack of stupid shit.
> 
> 
> That's an awful lot of foam coming from someone who "doesn't care".

Ironic PKB foam, at that.

-- 
Mustaffa Sheboygan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566562

less fiZZ, more bEEr

> Ironic PKB foam, at that.
> 
> -- 
> Mustaffa Sheboygan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566248

On Mon, 28 Mar 2016 18:12:03 +0200 (CEST), Friendly Neighborhood Vote
Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

>No, James. You're supposed to do the experiment. I know that if I do
>the experiment, you'll dismiss the findings as flawed, so you'll do
>the hard work to disprove your moronity. Not as though it needs any
>further disproving than your having retracted the main premise as you
>squirmed to escape being proven wrong yet again.


Translation: See how I tactfully admitted that I can't do the
experiment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#566198 — Snell's laW etc. ad vomitorium

merely find the partial pressure of HOH at sealevel, 792K

> going to try to insult the person offering the reward.
> 
> 
> Did I get this right?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web