Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #520084 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-09-10 19:24 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 283 — 21 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-10 09:01 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-10 15:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-10 19:07 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-11 15:17 -0500
Re: Rocky wrong again jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-11 20:38 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-11 18:54 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 09:11 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 08:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 10:33 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 21:46 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 19:24 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 13:36 -0500
Re: Rocky still crazy jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-14 18:54 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-14 21:19 +0100
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:31 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 14:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:26 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 03:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-11 18:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 06:43 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-11 19:22 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-11 15:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-12 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-12 11:47 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-13 07:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-14 17:22 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-15 17:39 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-15 19:29 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 09:21 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 18:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:51 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 15:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:34 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 23:00 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:03 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:24 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:43 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:01 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:29 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:25 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 14:13 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-16 13:25 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-16 17:56 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. DoW #10" <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:34 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 17:00 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 17:09 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:40 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:24 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-18 10:12 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:35 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-20 09:47 -0400
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:44 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:11 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 10:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 12:20 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:43 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-19 21:15 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:12 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-20 22:25 +0000
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 15:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There are no brains in Rocky's head Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 15:29 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-20 18:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 00:02 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-21 02:27 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-21 03:04 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-22 14:18 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 21:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 00:57 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-23 15:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 15:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:49 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 15:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:18 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:21 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 17:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:06 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 16:59 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 07:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:30 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 17:58 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 05:23 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-22 13:38 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-23 14:05 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:48 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 06:48 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes BDK <Control@Worldcontrol.com> - 2015-09-24 09:41 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 13:08 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-24 17:13 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-24 21:52 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-25 15:46 -0500
planes thereupon none where noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 18:10 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-24 16:14 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-25 04:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-23 08:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-24 03:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:32 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 15:50 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:32 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:13 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 17:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 18:33 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:15 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 05:42 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 14:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-20 18:23 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 07:17 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-19 11:24 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 11:45 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:38 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 07:02 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 21:26 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:13 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 21:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:57 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-22 16:01 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-22 16:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:40 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:11 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:15 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 01:12 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 06:44 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:39 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:31 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:15 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-20 20:04 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:41 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:17 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 22:11 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:14 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-21 13:07 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-21 18:25 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-21 20:27 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-22 07:36 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-22 10:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2015-09-22 17:47 +0100
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 2 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 05:27 +0200
9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-23 06:09 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-23 20:22 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:53 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-24 01:49 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1b Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-25 07:33 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes, Pt. 1a Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-24 06:59 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:27 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 17:38 -0400
no asbestos cladding on the main beams noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0700
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-18 05:59 +0200
if the planes were not bombs, or if they were bombs noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 11:21 -0700
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:42 -0500
Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:36 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:19 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:48 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-15 04:18 +0200
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 15:55 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-15 17:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:01 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:36 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:07 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:44 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 03:41 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:21 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-19 05:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-20 04:20 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-20 05:14 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-21 17:56 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-22 04:53 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-22 03:28 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 03:36 -0500
9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-16 07:37 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-16 17:46 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:06 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-17 00:30 -0400
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:38 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-16 17:59 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-17 07:11 +0200
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 00:05 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-14 17:06 +0200
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 15:57 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-14 16:31 -0500
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:06 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 12:09 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:47 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-11 17:20 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-12 05:36 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-09-12 08:02 -0400
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-13 05:42 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-13 04:18 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-13 04:45 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:04 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:03 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-14 14:19 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-15 16:17 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-15 22:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:54 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 16:01 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-16 21:08 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 04:02 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 02:12 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-17 13:33 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-17 13:45 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-17 16:45 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 21:06 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-18 17:46 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-19 06:25 +0200
Re: Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-19 04:22 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-16 11:32 -0500
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 12:40 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Stagger Lee <stag@nomail.invalid> - 2015-09-16 15:28 -0400
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Siri Cruz <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2015-09-16 14:10 -0700
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-16 16:56 -0500
Re: Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-16 14:19 -0700
Re: 9/11/01 - There were no planes "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 14:04 -0700
no bombs that were not planes e.g noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-09-10 19:24 -0700
Page 3 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 15 Next page →
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 08:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3063312974fc150198aea8@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #521452 |
In article <erqiva10vg3rs16fv6k7dfjimbb4hnt1md@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:29:13 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: > >On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:39:13 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." > ><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > >>On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:34:44 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: > >>>On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:43:18 -0500, Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> > >>>wrote: > >>>>On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:22:04 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>None of the conspiracy whacko's can manage to write a sentence > >>>>>without some reference to shit, turds, and assholes. > >>>>> > >>>>> And that includes the ring leader Pathological Liar Roger the stalker/heckler. > >>>> > >>>>There is no way that jet fuel would get hot enough to melt steel > >>> > >>>It didn't melt steel it WEAKENED IT. > >>> > >>>It isn't rocket science to know that if you heat steel it WEAKENS it. > >>>WEAKENED steel will fail. When it can no longer hold a load failure > >>>occurs. > >> > >>Topaz is an idiot. There is a thing called a forge that melts > >>steel using, of all things, coal which doesn't burn as hot as > >>jet fuel. It's the oxygen pumped in that creates the high temps. > >> > >>In those towers there was a natural forge - the air came in the > >>bottom and accelerated out the top - tall chimney and a natural > >>forge. There was so much air (oxygen) present that the temperatures got > >>high enough to MELT steel. > >> > >>FACT. > > > >Gerg, you're inhaling fumes again from your poop bucket. > > > >Coke, a form of coal, is needed to melt steel in an open forge. > > Like I said - coal! A Corvette is a form of an automobile but > it's still an automobile. Duh! > > >The WTC collapsed because the steel WSEAKENED and the floors pancaked > >down. > > To some extent. But the fact that way less steel was recovered > than was in place prior to the collapse indicates that some > of it actually MELTED. > > All the idiots who claim it wasn't hot enough to melt steel > are just plain ignorant. If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 15:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <rshjva5ougho65ghbaqsjf6pugilpg8iho@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521463 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! Read this for verification of molten steel in the basement. http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 20:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pquocc-78l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521492 |
In sci.physics Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > >>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. > > Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! > > Read this for verification of molten steel in the > basement. > > http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html A lot of that is laughable, but it doesn't change anything. If there were actually molten steel, all it would prove is that the fire was very hot. BFD. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 16:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <rqkjva110kasi6jhluhtb231ucegvfkj9f@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521492 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > >>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. > >Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! > >Read this for verification of molten steel in the >basement. > >http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html > >You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. Gerg, pay attention. I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were not molten pools of steel in the basement.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 16:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <tdljva90iiogvu3ljs66mfsessb6dbpor3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521506 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." ><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >> >>>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >> >>Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >> >>Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>basement. >> >>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >> >>You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. > >Gerg, pay attention. > >I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. > >I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. > >The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were >not molten pools of steel in the basement. > Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. Well, duh! Steel tends to do that when it's melting. And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl says about things that involve physics? Now go powder your nose. -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 21:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fe2pcc-jjl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> |
| In reply to | #521507 |
In sci.physics Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>> >>>>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>>>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >>> >>>Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >>> >>>Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>>basement. >>> >>>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >>> >>>You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. >> >>Gerg, pay attention. >> >>I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. >> >>I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >>could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >>caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. >> >>The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were >>not molten pools of steel in the basement. >> > > > Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. Well, duh! > Steel tends to do that when it's melting. Steel weakens at tempertures far below the melting point. 1,000 F gets soft. 2,500 F melts. -- Jim Pennino
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 15:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nh8mva1fkit7vt1f68q89jhvm1rd6uojcu@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521516 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:10:07 -0000, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >Steel weakens at tempertures far below the melting point. > >1,000 F gets soft. >2,500 F melts. It melted in huge quantities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7S9bnd_pnY www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 17:20 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <49njvapvk68t2ja36vt0dt3n55n6mqkp45@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521507 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:51:57 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>> >>>>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>>>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >>> >>>Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >>> >>>Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>>basement. >>> >>>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >>> >>>You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. >> >>Gerg, pay attention. >> >>I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. >> >>I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >>could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >>caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. >> >>The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were >>not molten pools of steel in the basement. >> > > >Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. That's correct Gerg. >Well, duh! Steel tends to do that when it's melting. All it has to do is weaken before failure is a certainty. Ever heard of tensile strength, Gerg? Tensile strength is the maximum stress that a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before failing or breaking. WIKI ref. Stretch and pull. No heat applied. >And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl >says about things that involve physics? I know about utensil strength & tensile testing. You don't. Be sure you stay away from all the melted steel the next time a guy wire fails on the SS Mustard Colored Turd.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 17:26 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <6cnjva1qqivlkhsmog68jf88qcug8tlgoi@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521520 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:20:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:51:57 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." ><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > >>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>>> >>>>>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>>>>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >>>> >>>>Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >>>> >>>>Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>>>basement. >>>> >>>>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >>>> >>>>You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. >>> >>>Gerg, pay attention. >>> >>>I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. >>> >>>I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >>>could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >>>caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. >>> >>>The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were >>>not molten pools of steel in the basement. >>> >> >> >>Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. > >That's correct Gerg. > >>Well, duh! Steel tends to do that when it's melting. > >All it has to do is weaken before failure is a certainty. > >Ever heard of tensile strength, Gerg? Yes. >Tensile strength is the maximum stress that a material can withstand >while being stretched or pulled before failing or breaking. WIKI ref. > >Stretch and pull. No heat applied. Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. >>And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl >>says about things that involve physics? > >I know about utensil strength & tensile testing. You don't. You try to talk a good game but you seem to lack the fundamentals. >Be sure you stay away from all the melted steel the next time a guy >wire fails on the SS Mustard Colored Turd. Guy wire? LOL. I see you are also ignorant about sailboats. There are no guy wires. There is *standing rigging*. -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 18:34 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <r2qjvalkrsgkv779nuuimrablr0d7q0asr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521523 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:26:23 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:20:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:51:57 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>>><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>>>>>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >>>>> >>>>>Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >>>>> >>>>>Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>>>>basement. >>>>> >>>>>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >>>>> >>>>>You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. >>>> >>>>Gerg, pay attention. >>>> >>>>I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. >>>> >>>>I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >>>>could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >>>>caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. >>>> >>>>The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were >>>>not molten pools of steel in the basement. >>>> >>> >>> >>>Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. >> >>That's correct Gerg. >> >>>Well, duh! Steel tends to do that when it's melting. >> >>All it has to do is weaken before failure is a certainty. >> >>Ever heard of tensile strength, Gerg? > >Yes. > >>Tensile strength is the maximum stress that a material can withstand >>while being stretched or pulled before failing or breaking. WIKI ref. >> >>Stretch and pull. No heat applied. > >Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. >But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a >central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. Gerg, this is not rocket science. 1. The steel weakened. 2. Then the steel failed. 3. The load which could no longer be supported began to fall. 4. Compression failure caused the floors to pancake down. >>>And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl >>>says about things that involve physics? >> >>I know about utensil strength & tensile testing. You don't. > >You try to talk a good game but you seem to lack the >fundamentals. LOL Next time I'll make sure I number the steps for you. >>Be sure you stay away from all the melted steel the next time a guy >>wire fails on the SS Mustard Colored Turd. > >Guy wire? LOL. I see you are also ignorant about sailboats. >There are no guy wires. There is *standing rigging*. Poor Gerg. LOL Guy wires ON SAILBOATS. http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=guy+wires+on+sailboats&view=detailv2&qpvt=guy+wires+on+sailboats&id=C05CB8B2E0E5D5C488AA5812A19D44116CB50D68&selectedIndex=10&ccid=ZjG%2b4o6v&simid=608037803550510965&thid=JN.k%2fLOjNv%2frlYsuBNG6xh0ig&ajaxhist=0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 21:41 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9u5kva1a02madf6urp24h8vdttm0ifn80c@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521541 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:34:21 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:26:23 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." ><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: > >>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:20:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:51:57 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>>>><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>>>>>>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >>>>>> >>>>>>Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >>>>>> >>>>>>Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>>>>>basement. >>>>>> >>>>>>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >>>>>> >>>>>>You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. >>>>> >>>>>Gerg, pay attention. >>>>> >>>>>I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. >>>>> >>>>>I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >>>>>could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >>>>>caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. >>>>> >>>>>The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were >>>>>not molten pools of steel in the basement. >>>>> >>>>Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. >>> >>>That's correct Gerg. >>> >>>>Well, duh! Steel tends to do that when it's melting. >>> >>>All it has to do is weaken before failure is a certainty. >>> >>>Ever heard of tensile strength, Gerg? >> >>Yes. >> >>>Tensile strength is the maximum stress that a material can withstand >>>while being stretched or pulled before failing or breaking. WIKI ref. >>> >>>Stretch and pull. No heat applied. >> >>Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. >>But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a >>central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. > >Gerg, this is not rocket science. > >1. The steel weakened. Yes, because it got so hot from the fuel enhanced fire that it commenced to melt. >2. Then the steel failed. Yes, it failed in compression which has nothing to do with pulling as in tensile strength but had everything to do with pushing as compression forces. >3. The load which could no longer be supported began to fall. One entire floor fell where the central support column failed under compression. This floor fell to the floor below and knocked that floor down. And, so it went. Floor after floor slammed down on the one below and knocked it down. >4. Compression failure caused the floors to pancake down. Yes, so you admit you are wrong about your silly tensile strength claims? >>>>And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl >>>>says about things that involve physics? >>> >>>I know about utensil strength & tensile testing. You don't. >> >>You try to talk a good game but you seem to lack the >>fundamentals. > >LOL Next time I'll make sure I number the steps for you. > >>>Be sure you stay away from all the melted steel the next time a guy >>>wire fails on the SS Mustard Colored Turd. >> >>Guy wire? LOL. I see you are also ignorant about sailboats. >>There are no guy wires. There is *standing rigging*. > >Poor Gerg. LOL > >Guy wires ON SAILBOATS. > >http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=guy+wires+on+sailboats&view=detailv2&qpvt=guy+wires+on+sailboats&id=C05CB8B2E0E5D5C488AA5812A19D44116CB50D68&selectedIndex=10&ccid=ZjG%2b4o6v&simid=608037803550510965&thid=JN.k%2fLOjNv%2frlYsuBNG6xh0ig&ajaxhist=0 Those are more properly called stays which comprise the standing rigging. Because some lubberly web page incorrectly calls them guys only goes to show that some lubberly types like you don't call them out on their obvious mistakes. Standing rigging on modern small sailboats usually consists of stainless steel wire and fittings used to support the mast and keep it in column. There are upper and lower shrouds which shrouds are stays that support the mast athwartship. There are forestays and backstays which support the mast fore and aft. There are even running backstays. Guy wires are for circus tents, you fool. Don't argue with a sailor, wench! -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 18:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8p9rl0.hv4.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #521561 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:34:21 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:26:23 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:20:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett >>> <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:51:57 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>>> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett >>>>> <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>>>>> <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" >>>>>>> <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... >>>>>>>> it didn't >>>>>>>> vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>>>>>> basement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gerg, pay attention. >>>>>> >>>>>> I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the >>>>>> WTC. >>>>>> >>>>>> I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >>>>>> could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >>>>>> caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. >>>>>> >>>>>> The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or >>>>>> were >>>>>> not molten pools of steel in the basement. >>>>>> >>>>> Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. >>>> >>>> That's correct Gerg. >>>> >>>>> Well, duh! Steel tends to do that when it's melting. >>>> >>>> All it has to do is weaken before failure is a certainty. >>>> >>>> Ever heard of tensile strength, Gerg? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> Tensile strength is the maximum stress that a material can >>>> withstand >>>> while being stretched or pulled before failing or breaking. WIKI >>>> ref. >>>> >>>> Stretch and pull. No heat applied. >>> >>> Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. >>> But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a >>> central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. >> >> Gerg, this is not rocket science. >> >> 1. The steel weakened. > > Yes, because it got so hot from the fuel enhanced fire > that it commenced to melt. > >> 2. Then the steel failed. > > Yes, it failed in compression which has nothing to do > with pulling as in tensile strength but had everything to > do with pushing as compression forces. > >> 3. The load which could no longer be supported began to fall. > > One entire floor fell where the central support column failed > under compression. > > This floor fell to the floor below and knocked that floor down. > And, so it went. Floor after floor slammed down on the one below > and knocked it down. > >> 4. Compression failure caused the floors to pancake down. > > Yes, so you admit you are wrong about your silly tensile > strength claims? > >>>>> And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl >>>>> says about things that involve physics? >>>> >>>> I know about utensil strength & tensile testing. You don't. >>> >>> You try to talk a good game but you seem to lack the >>> fundamentals. >> >> LOL Next time I'll make sure I number the steps for you. >> >>>> Be sure you stay away from all the melted steel the next time a guy >>>> wire fails on the SS Mustard Colored Turd. >>> >>> Guy wire? LOL. I see you are also ignorant about sailboats. >>> There are no guy wires. There is *standing rigging*. >> >> Poor Gerg. LOL >> >> Guy wires ON SAILBOATS. >> >> http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=guy+wires+on+sailboats&view=detailv2&qpvt=guy+wires+on+sailboats&id=C05CB8B2E0E5D5C488AA5812A19D44116CB50D68&selectedIndex=10&ccid=ZjG%2b4o6v&simid=608037803550510965&thid=JN.k%2fLOjNv%2frlYsuBNG6xh0ig&ajaxhist=0 > > Those are more properly called stays which comprise the standing > rigging. > Because some lubberly web page incorrectly calls them guys only goes > to > show that some lubberly types like you don't call them out on their > obvious mistakes. > > Standing rigging on modern small sailboats usually consists of > stainless > steel wire and fittings used to support the mast and keep it in > column. > > There are upper and lower shrouds which shrouds are stays that support > the mast athwartship. There are forestays and backstays which support > the > mast fore and aft. There are even running backstays. Guy wires are for > circus tents, you fool. > > Don't argue with a sailor, wench! it's impossible to do that here because there are none
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 18:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <64089b30-f5c2-4ea3-836a-2500018c6fcb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #521561 |
concrete has no tensile strength; it is mostly sand & gravel > Yes, it failed in compression which has nothing to do > with pulling as in tensile strength but had everything to > do with pushing as compression forces. > > >3. The load which could no longer be supported began to fall. > > One entire floor fell where the central support column failed > under compression. > > This floor fell to the floor below and knocked that floor down. > And, so it went. Floor after floor slammed down on the one below > and knocked it down. > > >4. Compression failure caused the floors to pancake down. > > Yes, so you admit you are wrong about your silly tensile > strength claims? > > >>>>And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl > >>>>says about things that involve physics? > >>> > >>>I know about utensil strength & tensile testing. You don't. > >> > >>You try to talk a good game but you seem to lack the > >>fundamentals. > > > >LOL Next time I'll make sure I number the steps for you. > > > >>>Be sure you stay away from all the melted steel the next time a guy > >>>wire fails on the SS Mustard Colored Turd. > >> > >>Guy wire? LOL. I see you are also ignorant about sailboats. > >>There are no guy wires. There is *standing rigging*. > > > >Poor Gerg. LOL > > > >Guy wires ON SAILBOATS. > > > >http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=guy+wires+on+sailboats&view=detailv2&qpvt=guy+wires+on+sailboats&id=C05CB8B2E0E5D5C488AA5812A19D44116CB50D68&selectedIndex=10&ccid=ZjG%2b4o6v&simid=608037803550510965&thid=JN.k%2fLOjNv%2frlYsuBNG6xh0ig&ajaxhist=0 > > Those are more properly called stays which comprise the standing rigging. > Because some lubberly web page incorrectly calls them guys only goes to > show that some lubberly types like you don't call them out on their > obvious mistakes. > > Standing rigging on modern small sailboats usually consists of stainless > steel wire and fittings used to support the mast and keep it in column. > > There are upper and lower shrouds which shrouds are stays that support > the mast athwartship. There are forestays and backstays which support the > mast fore and aft. There are even running backstays. Guy wires are for > circus tents, you fool. > > Don't argue with a sailor, wench! > > -- > Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 00:23 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <9hfkva5ddm18hlt8btn36jt2ja3ujbpnus@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521561 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:41:14 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:34:21 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: > >>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:26:23 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:20:38 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:51:57 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>>><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:43:55 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: >>>>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:50:12 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." >>>>>><greghall@yacht_master.fake> wrote: >>>>>>>On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 08:57:06 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If it melted, it would still be at the bottom of the pile... it didn't >>>>>>>>vaporize and float away like Rocky seems to think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Get your fag head out of your ass, bumpkin! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Read this for verification of molten steel in the >>>>>>>basement. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/moltensteel.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You and Sarah are stupid AND ignorant. >>>>>> >>>>>>Gerg, pay attention. >>>>>> >>>>>>I never said anything about molten steel in the basement of the WTC. >>>>>> >>>>>>I said the steel at the WTC weakened. When the steel weakened it >>>>>>could no longer hold the load. The failure of the weakened steel >>>>>>caused the floors to buckle and pancake down. >>>>>> >>>>>>The buildings fell due to structure failure before there were or were >>>>>>not molten pools of steel in the basement. >>>>>> >>>>>Sarah, YOU pay attention. You said the steel *weakened*. >>>> >>>>That's correct Gerg. >>>> >>>>>Well, duh! Steel tends to do that when it's melting. >>>> >>>>All it has to do is weaken before failure is a certainty. >>>> >>>>Ever heard of tensile strength, Gerg? >>> >>>Yes. >>> >>>>Tensile strength is the maximum stress that a material can withstand >>>>while being stretched or pulled before failing or breaking. WIKI ref. >>>> >>>>Stretch and pull. No heat applied. >>> >>>Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. >>>But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a >>>central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. >> >>Gerg, this is not rocket science. >> >>1. The steel weakened. > >Yes, >>2. Then the steel failed. > >Yes, > >>3. The load which could no longer be supported began to fall. > >One entire floor fell where the central support column failed >under compression. > >This floor fell to the floor below and knocked that floor down. >And, so it went. Floor after floor slammed down on the one below >and knocked it down. > >>4. Compression failure caused the floors to pancake down. > >Yes, so you admit you are wrong about your silly tensile >strength claims? You can try and wiggle word it Gerg the beams lost their tensile strength and buckled. That failure led to the collapse. >>>>>And, do you really think anybody takes seriously what a girl >>>>>says about things that involve physics? >>>> >>>>I know about utensil strength & tensile testing. You don't. >>> >>>You try to talk a good game but you seem to lack the >>>fundamentals. >> >>LOL Next time I'll make sure I number the steps for you. >> >>>>Be sure you stay away from all the melted steel the next time a guy >>>>wire fails on the SS Mustard Colored Turd. >>> >>>Guy wire? LOL. I see you are also ignorant about sailboats. >>>There are no guy wires. There is *standing rigging*. >> >>Poor Gerg. LOL >> >>Guy wires ON SAILBOATS. >> >>http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=guy+wires+on+sailboats&view=detailv2&qpvt=guy+wires+on+sailboats&id=C05CB8B2E0E5D5C488AA5812A19D44116CB50D68&selectedIndex=10&ccid=ZjG%2b4o6v&simid=608037803550510965&thid=JN.k%2fLOjNv%2frlYsuBNG6xh0ig&ajaxhist=0 > >Those are more properly called stays I've sailed Gerg. Everything from Lightnings to 12 meters. I live 20 miles from Newport RI. [ flush remaining crapola]
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 21:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3063e49b10b6000198aebf@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #521561 |
In article <9u5kva1a02madf6urp24h8vdttm0ifn80c@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > athwartship Sailors talk funny. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 01:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.x43csmdltm21m2@benson.localhost> |
| In reply to | #521598 |
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:42:44 -0400, Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > In article <9u5kva1a02madf6urp24h8vdttm0ifn80c@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > >> athwartship > > Sailors talk funny. > > "fortosay", i bet you never went to law school... -- http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg http://cafepress.com/kooktown http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public. :) if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try: http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2 http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written, Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd --
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-17 15:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <qr8mva5k1uamu0ai7gl9179qckfajceo90@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521541 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:34:21 -0400, Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote: \ >Gerg, this is not rocket science. > >1. The steel weakened. >2. Then the steel failed. >3. The load which could no longer be supported began to fall. >4. Compression failure caused the floors to pancake down. Here is proof that this government BS is nonsense: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkaX5n3pfZE www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 16:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30639fbf1eb4bf8798aeb3@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #521523 |
In article <6cnjva1qqivlkhsmog68jf88qcug8tlgoi@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. > But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a > central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. > The failure analysis reports attributed the collapse to BEAMS, not columns, sagging as they achieved plasticity from the heat. Once that happened, the floors they supported started collapsing, with the impact of each collapse causing the floor below it to collapse. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 21:43 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ni6kva5mhpjc78ndrb9561vdhjig8f7tg0@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #521555 |
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:48:57 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >In article <6cnjva1qqivlkhsmog68jf88qcug8tlgoi@4ax.com>, >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > >> Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. >> But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a >> central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. >> > >The failure analysis reports attributed the collapse to BEAMS, not >columns, sagging as they achieved plasticity from the heat. Once that >happened, the floors they supported started collapsing, with the impact >of each collapse causing the floor below it to collapse. Idiot! You don't think the central column consisted on one giant beam do you? LOL! The central column consisted of a series of beams sort of like one of those tall radio towers you see everywhere. Duh! The beams that failed failed in column. -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-16 21:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3063e6866e07800698aec2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #521562 |
In article <ni6kva5mhpjc78ndrb9561vdhjig8f7tg0@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:48:57 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > >In article <6cnjva1qqivlkhsmog68jf88qcug8tlgoi@4ax.com>, > >greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > > > > >> Being a man, I know ALL about stretch and pull, Sarah. > >> But, do tell what stretch and pull has to do with a > >> central, structural steel column that failed UNDER COMPRESSION. > >> > > > >The failure analysis reports attributed the collapse to BEAMS, not > >columns, sagging as they achieved plasticity from the heat. Once that > >happened, the floors they supported started collapsing, with the impact > >of each collapse causing the floor below it to collapse. > > > Idiot! You don't think the central column consisted on one > giant beam do you? LOL! The central column consisted of a > series of beams sort of like one of those tall radio towers > you see everywhere. Duh! The beams that failed failed in > column. The beams sagged across their spans, and simply collapsed. It was primarily the sagging of the beams which caused the ensuing chain reaction. A vertical column under compression is pretty damned strong... unless something causes it to start to lean. Somebody needs to stuff your pie hole full of Tampons. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 15 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 15 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web