Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #517414 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 205 — 22 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 09:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 09:33 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-28 18:42 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:01 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:04 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 11:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:48 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:26 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is a joke) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 22:51 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:21 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moiré pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 00:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir矰attern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 16:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 18:01 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 14:17 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 19:58 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:04 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 20:40 +0000
Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 15:59 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 21:42 +0000
Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 16:58 -0500
Re: Rocky's pathetic life jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 22:41 +0000
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 07:03 -0400
Re: Jim proves he is FULL OF SHIT AGAIN gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-02 21:36 -0500
Re: Caught Jim in MORE BULLSHIT "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 16:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir? pattern) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (4 Jim no moir� pattern) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 09:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Proof we were given a life sized Disney Cartoon) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-02 14:19 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim is caught trolling) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Jim has eaten lies 'bout the PentaCON) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 12:21 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-29 22:55 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:30 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:11 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:27 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:32 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:19 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:32 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:54 -0500
Re: Rocky can't hold a job jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:34 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:29 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah spelled CGI wrong) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:38 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 23:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:51 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Two videos of the pre vaporization event jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 05:37 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:44 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-29 21:22 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 15:29 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:47 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Kent Wills "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:47 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 15:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 01:15 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:05 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:31 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (? for Sarah) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:58 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 03:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 15:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 15:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 14:59 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 08:25 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael (Hoaxlahoma) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-09-01 06:42 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE reply to Michael je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-09-01 00:03 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 18:08 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:36 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 11:06 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 21:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 16:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky still avoids my ?) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:20 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 19:30 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:30 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:29 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:43 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Rocky avoids Sarah's BS) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 20:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Telling FNN about the Sim switches) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:32 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:36 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FNN is complete bullshit) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 05:31 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:39 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:15 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 19:30 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 13:06 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:48 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 00:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 19:37 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-08-31 15:40 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 11:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (FFN still avoids my photo?) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-01 04:43 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 03:19 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE (Sarah still avoids my ?) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:42 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 18:18 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 15:49 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 15:57 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 21:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-28 18:10 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-28 23:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 12:09 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 17:45 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 13:05 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 18:25 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:39 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 16:53 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-28 18:55 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 05:08 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 00:56 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-28 23:07 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 09:52 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 09:05 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:39 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 04:00 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 10:03 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:41 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 18:44 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-29 15:54 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 17:07 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-29 16:38 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 FFN Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 19:32 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:16 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 20:37 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:22 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 21:54 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:02 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah 2 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-29 23:33 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 07:50 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 09:01 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:31 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah evidence of nukes. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 12:37 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:33 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 07:37 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:32 +0000
Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "Kadaitcha Man" <nospam.nospam.nospam@k12.ed.music.tickling> - 2015-08-31 04:22 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 06:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-30 17:46 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:14 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-31 17:34 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 23:07 +0000
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:18 -0400
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:15 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE caught Rick with no evidence and contradictory evidence Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:10 +0000
Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:13 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-08-31 18:33 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-08-31 22:49 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2015-08-31 19:29 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:29 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Baron von Lurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 21:02 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:18 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:45 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:17 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:01 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Sarah Ehrett <ninety7gt@cox.net> - 2015-09-03 16:32 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:49 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-08-31 17:12 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Baron VonLurk <vonlurk@gmail.com> - 2015-09-01 15:20 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-01 20:42 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 (was: Rocky the Retard discredits his own claims... Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah) Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2015-09-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:04 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 19:02 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:24 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> - 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> - 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000
Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah now 2 Ediot "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 08:25 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:45 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah no 2 Kent "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:28 -0500
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-29 20:34 +0200
Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE NoeDOTNatDOTNoe <dedanoe@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 07:27 -0700
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
| From | Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 20:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <slrnmuen2f.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org> |
| In reply to | #518587 |
In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:24:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > > >> >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW >> #1 wrote: >> >> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> > >> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily >> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. >> >> >> >> Any seconds? >> > >> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. >> >> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even >> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. >> >> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been >> kinder to you than I'd have been. > > You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do so, > would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more > than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > desperately to cling to. > > Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically trying > to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me > for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I > think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine > would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing > you can do to stop the inevitable. > > >> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, >> >> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last >> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. >> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have >> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? > > Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > > >> > and not one seconded that I've seen. >> >> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different >> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, >> unlike you. >> >> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello squawk >> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. >> >> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght >> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? >> >> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > > Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. *yawn* These Kook Award Acceptance Speeches were fun to read at first, but they're getting as tedious as the rest of your posts. I've found a better KotM nominee than you for August, so there's not much point in playing with you any longer. Don't forget to claim VICTOLLY, bore! -- PJR :-) τὸν οἰόμενον νόον ἔχειν ὁ νουθετέων ματαιοπονεῖ. - Democritus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 16:34 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <s8neua5h7edtpjcvq458a0usp76idb19pt@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #518588 |
On 2 Sep 2015 20:30:07 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote: >In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:24:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW >#1 wrote: > >> In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> >> >>> >>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW >>> #1 wrote: >>> >>> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >>> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >>> > >>> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily >>> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. >>> >> >>> >> Any seconds? >>> > >>> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. >>> >>> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even >>> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. >>> >>> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been >>> kinder to you than I'd have been. >> >> You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your >> silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your >> imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm >> "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do so, >> would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more >> than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really >> is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that >> calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so >> desperately to cling to. >> >> Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically trying >> to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me >> for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I >> think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that >> awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means >> about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine >> would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing >> you can do to stop the inevitable. >> >> >>> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, >>> >>> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last >>> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. >>> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have >>> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? >> >> Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. >> >> >>> > and not one seconded that I've seen. >>> >>> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different >>> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, >>> unlike you. >>> >>> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello squawk >>> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. >>> >>> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght >>> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? >>> >>> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. >> >> Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. > >*yawn* > >These Kook Award Acceptance Speeches were fun to read at first, but >they're getting as tedious as the rest of your posts. I've found a >better KotM nominee than you for August, so there's not much point in >playing with you any longer. Translation: "I lost!" LOL! -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 13:38 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3050fe0dc4fffbe698ad94@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518592 |
In article <s8neua5h7edtpjcvq458a0usp76idb19pt@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > On 2 Sep 2015 20:30:07 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote: > > >In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:24:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW > >#1 wrote: > > > >> In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >> > >> > >>> > >>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW > >>> #1 wrote: > >>> > >>> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >>> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >>> > > >>> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily > >>> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. > >>> >> > >>> >> Any seconds? > >>> > > >>> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. > >>> > >>> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even > >>> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. > >>> > >>> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been > >>> kinder to you than I'd have been. > >> > >> You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > >> silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > >> imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > >> "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do so, > >> would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more > >> than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > >> is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > >> calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > >> desperately to cling to. > >> > >> Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically trying > >> to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me > >> for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I > >> think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > >> awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > >> about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine > >> would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing > >> you can do to stop the inevitable. > >> > >> > >>> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, > >>> > >>> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last > >>> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. > >>> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have > >>> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? > >> > >> Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > >> > >> > >>> > and not one seconded that I've seen. > >>> > >>> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different > >>> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, > >>> unlike you. > >>> > >>> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello squawk > >>> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. > >>> > >>> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght > >>> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? > >>> > >>> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > >> > >> Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. > > > >*yawn* > > > >These Kook Award Acceptance Speeches were fun to read at first, but > >they're getting as tedious as the rest of your posts. I've found a > >better KotM nominee than you for August, so there's not much point in > >playing with you any longer. > > Translation: "I lost!" > > LOL! Yup. No other way to say it, than Peter has been dealt a big fat SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm). -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 23:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <8o7t98.pp8.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518595 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <s8neua5h7edtpjcvq458a0usp76idb19pt@4ax.com>, > greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > >> >> On 2 Sep 2015 20:30:07 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote: >> >> >In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:24:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW >> >#1 wrote: >> > >> >> In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> >> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, >> >>> DoW >> >>> #1 wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> >>> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> >>> > >> >>> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily >> >>> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Any seconds? >> >>> > >> >>> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. >> >>> >> >>> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even >> >>> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. >> >>> >> >>> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been >> >>> kinder to you than I'd have been. >> >> >> >> You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your >> >> silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your >> >> imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm >> >> "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do >> >> so, >> >> would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more >> >> than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really >> >> is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that >> >> calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so >> >> desperately to cling to. >> >> >> >> Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically >> >> trying >> >> to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking >> >> me >> >> for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I >> >> think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that >> >> awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means >> >> about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of >> >> mine >> >> would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing >> >> you can do to stop the inevitable. >> >> >> >> >> >>> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, >> >>> >> >>> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last >> >>> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. >> >>> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may >> >>> have >> >>> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? >> >> >> >> Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. >> >> >> >> >> >>> > and not one seconded that I've seen. >> >>> >> >>> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different >> >>> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, >> >>> unlike you. >> >>> >> >>> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello >> >>> > squawk >> >>> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. >> >>> >> >>> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles >> >>> lysaght >> >>> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? >> >>> >> >>> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. >> >> >> >> Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. >> > >> >*yawn* >> > >> >These Kook Award Acceptance Speeches were fun to read at first, but >> >they're getting as tedious as the rest of your posts. I've found a >> >better KotM nominee than you for August, so there's not much point in >> >playing with you any longer. >> >> Translation: "I lost!" >> >> LOL! > > Yup. No other way to say it, than Peter has been dealt a big fat > SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm). Yeppers! :-) <sorry, I'm late to class>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 21:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3052c3efa314739298adca@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518834 |
In article <8o7t98.pp8.19.1@news.alt.net>, kitty@meow.mix says... > > "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > In article <s8neua5h7edtpjcvq458a0usp76idb19pt@4ax.com>, > > greghall@yacht_master.fake says... > > > > > >> > >> On 2 Sep 2015 20:30:07 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote: > >> > >> >In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:24:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW > >> >#1 wrote: > >> > > >> >> In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >> >> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, > >> >>> DoW > >> >>> #1 wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >> >>> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily > >> >>> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> Any seconds? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. > >> >>> > >> >>> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even > >> >>> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. > >> >>> > >> >>> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been > >> >>> kinder to you than I'd have been. > >> >> > >> >> You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > >> >> silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > >> >> imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > >> >> "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do > >> >> so, > >> >> would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more > >> >> than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > >> >> is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > >> >> calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > >> >> desperately to cling to. > >> >> > >> >> Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically > >> >> trying > >> >> to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking > >> >> me > >> >> for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I > >> >> think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > >> >> awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > >> >> about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of > >> >> mine > >> >> would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing > >> >> you can do to stop the inevitable. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, > >> >>> > >> >>> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last > >> >>> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. > >> >>> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may > >> >>> have > >> >>> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? > >> >> > >> >> Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> > and not one seconded that I've seen. > >> >>> > >> >>> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different > >> >>> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, > >> >>> unlike you. > >> >>> > >> >>> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello > >> >>> > squawk > >> >>> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. > >> >>> > >> >>> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles > >> >>> lysaght > >> >>> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? > >> >>> > >> >>> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > >> >> > >> >> Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. > >> > > >> >*yawn* > >> > > >> >These Kook Award Acceptance Speeches were fun to read at first, but > >> >they're getting as tedious as the rest of your posts. I've found a > >> >better KotM nominee than you for August, so there's not much point in > >> >playing with you any longer. > >> > >> Translation: "I lost!" > >> > >> LOL! > > > > Yup. No other way to say it, than Peter has been dealt a big fat > > SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm). > > Yeppers! :-) > > <sorry, I'm late to class> Hear that? I probably blew another chance at being a KotM. shit... I coulda been a conTENdah! -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 00:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <8o7u4i.umq.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518837 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > In article <8o7t98.pp8.19.1@news.alt.net>, kitty@meow.mix says... > > >> >> "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >> > In article <s8neua5h7edtpjcvq458a0usp76idb19pt@4ax.com>, >> > greghall@yacht_master.fake says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> On 2 Sep 2015 20:30:07 GMT, Peter J Ross <peadar.ruadh@gmx.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:24:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW >> >> >#1 wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> >> >> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, >> >> >>> DoW >> >> >>> #1 wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> >> >>> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and >> >> >>> >> easily >> >> >>> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> Any seconds? >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even >> >> >>> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has >> >> >>> been >> >> >>> kinder to you than I'd have been. >> >> >> >> >> >> You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think >> >> >> your >> >> >> silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your >> >> >> imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not >> >> >> I'm >> >> >> "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To >> >> >> do >> >> >> so, >> >> >> would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing >> >> >> more >> >> >> than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it >> >> >> really >> >> >> is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so >> >> >> that >> >> >> calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying >> >> >> so >> >> >> desperately to cling to. >> >> >> >> >> >> Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically >> >> >> trying >> >> >> to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be >> >> >> thanking >> >> >> me >> >> >> for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I >> >> >> think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that >> >> >> awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means >> >> >> about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of >> >> >> mine >> >> >> would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's >> >> >> nothing >> >> >> you can do to stop the inevitable. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 >> >> >>> > days, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the >> >> >>> last >> >> >>> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. >> >> >>> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may >> >> >>> have >> >> >>> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so >> >> >>> ungrateful? >> >> >> >> >> >> Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to >> >> >> me. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> > and not one seconded that I've seen. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three >> >> >>> different >> >> >>> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, >> >> >>> unlike you. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that >> >> >>> > cello >> >> >>> > squawk >> >> >>> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles >> >> >>> lysaght >> >> >>> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. >> >> >> >> >> >> Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. >> >> > >> >> >*yawn* >> >> > >> >> >These Kook Award Acceptance Speeches were fun to read at first, but >> >> >they're getting as tedious as the rest of your posts. I've found a >> >> >better KotM nominee than you for August, so there's not much point in >> >> >playing with you any longer. >> >> >> >> Translation: "I lost!" >> >> >> >> LOL! >> > >> > Yup. No other way to say it, than Peter has been dealt a big fat >> > SPANKY-SPANKY! (tm). >> >> Yeppers! :-) >> >> <sorry, I'm late to class> > > Hear that? I probably blew another chance at being a KotM. shit... I > coulda been a conTENdah! Only the *real* k00ks would believe that. It's pretty clear in this group who "they" are.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 13:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3050fdba3f27632998ad93@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518588 |
In article <slrnmuen2f.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > > In alt.usenet.kooks on Wed, 2 Sep 2015 13:24:13 -0700, Checkmate, DoW > #1 wrote: > > > In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > > > > > >> > >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW > >> #1 wrote: > >> > >> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >> > > >> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily > >> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. > >> >> > >> >> Any seconds? > >> > > >> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. > >> > >> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even > >> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. > >> > >> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been > >> kinder to you than I'd have been. > > > > You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > > silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > > imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > > "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do so, > > would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more > > than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > > is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > > calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > > desperately to cling to. > > > > Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically trying > > to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me > > for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I > > think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > > awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > > about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine > > would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing > > you can do to stop the inevitable. > > > > > >> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, > >> > >> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last > >> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. > >> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have > >> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? > > > > Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > > > > > >> > and not one seconded that I've seen. > >> > >> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different > >> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, > >> unlike you. > >> > >> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello squawk > >> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. > >> > >> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght > >> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? > >> > >> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > > > > Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. > > *yawn* > > These Kook Award Acceptance Speeches were fun to read at first, but > they're getting as tedious as the rest of your posts. I've found a > better KotM nominee than you for August, so there's not much point in > playing with you any longer. > > Don't forget to claim VICTOLLY, bore! Oh, darn... giving up so soon? -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 13:35 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <8o4bq7.5qu.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518587 |
Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > > >> >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, >> DoW #1 wrote: >> >>> In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >>> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >>> >>>> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily >>>> deserving of a KotM nomination. >>>> >>>> Any seconds? >>> >>> No, we don't do that shit here anymore. >> >> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even >> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. >> >> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been >> kinder to you than I'd have been. > > You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do > so, would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing > more > than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > desperately to cling to. > > Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically > trying to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be > thanking me for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, > although I > think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of > mine would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's > nothing > you can do to stop the inevitable. > > >>> How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, >> >> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last >> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. >> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may >> have saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so >> ungrateful? > > Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > > >>> and not one seconded that I've seen. >> >> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different >> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, >> unlike you. >> >>> You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello >>> squawk or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. >> >> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles >> lysaght the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? >> >> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > > Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. and the checkmate gets the i have the biggest gang award
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 07:41 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <80fc45293cad3244757cb9753e146894@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #518589 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
%, in <news:8o4bq7.5qu.19.1@news.alt.net> did thusly jump head first
into the wood chipper again:
> Jim "Jism Junkie Gerbil Cannon" Gorman (aka Chimpy the
> Coin-Slot Operated SuckMonkey, aka Checkmate, Destroyer
> of Wieners #1) wrote:
> and the checkmate gets the i have the biggest gang award
No, Chimpy gets the "Pivotman For The Biggest CircleJerk" award.
<snicker>
--
FNVWe:
"The Man Who Spanked Chimpy Checkmate The Cowardly CockSmoker Out Of
AUK, Then Out Of The Flonk, Then Into Insanity, Then Made Him Run Away
Like A Little Spankard Bitch. Again."
In which Checkmate admits to being a faggot and fantasizing about men:
MID: <feb093af883d0bf288e85863264900ed@dizum.com>
MID: <ab050c692202f7d955f7d2876fd39d56@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate says he wants to spank guys all night long:
MID: <k3m5ls$3pr$1@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate confesses his desire to fuck who he claims is a
guy:
MID: <k3oolf$cpe$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k9nj0v$u4a$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <l8ogd6$1cd$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lclrtd$eei$4@news.mixmin.net>
In which Checkmate admits he'd definitely fuck a male dog:
MID: <k2h0j1$6ll$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k4dsc7$l32$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <k5m8o5$vmq$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
In which Checkmate admits to having a golden showers fetish:
MID: <k79p80$9ps$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9l0$nf0$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k8t9kv$nev$5@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k994eg$77l$1@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <k9i8is$sna$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <lf3noh$sqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <76b587bf03232be29596c7a5e11f8eef@dizum.com>
MID: <d1590e1490afb94915166440ceb1190f@dizum.com>
MID: <4c614669bd9da0e2ab54c7a8618864f2@dizum.com>
In which Checkmate asks a guy for a blowjob (again):
MID: <ka4m1r$8rs$2@newsfeed.x-privat.org>
MID: <knd50p$7ni$2@news.albasani.net>
MID: <knnmme$3a4$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kp77db$rqk$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <kvvjjb$a8u$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l069qt$g3j$9@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l1b6g1$qqv$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l65hh2$jpd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l9b7ha$ret$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfe72e$q0s$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lffimp$k2f$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <13de9e018d33aa5c02a89f8acfd8c2f8@dizum.com>
MID: <ddfe5035129d525fb2c441289a7b3c1b@dizum.com>
MID: <8352c247386df60552fec12941ad0c47@dizum.com>
MID: <863c1b2a4221005e6d5252e4b2f955b1@dizum.com>
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
MID: <aacd887c22128680f39ec3ca7f7e1613@dizum.com>
MID: <372519cc110e5acf0d73268cb1a697e9@dizum.com>
Checkmate's got a thing about tickling guy's asses with random
objects:
MID: <l8rapt$rfm$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <lfm4f8$3jb$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <li2ao1$3rf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <37fb49820eaf36d0a45e91ce73d37d44@dizum.com>
MID: <13badb999438389ea8894228e51614a3@dizum.com>
MID: <2ce704d96dbf41ca89fd9eda221cb83c@dizum.com>
MID: <f9b10e223db85839d004420449391270@dizum.com>
MID: <184091e3de3a10096805606ec6dc5866@dizum.com>
MID: <ee740ba6bc409af0d2b4a66170b4e4d7@dizum.com>
MID: <d1d62217afbcbf98470365178072415a@dizum.com>
MID: <ac96244a69bc75dd3a60e8defda0b966@dizum.com>
MID: <9f02c35ef6d67ac06ee55f90199c3aaa@dizum.com>
MID: <3e4b3a8bb953839b7d2658130dcb927e@dizum.com>
MID: <9ec2ad3439122a906207c9f74c4a3a06@dizum.com>
MID: <761ef52f7fc54d46dd50e2692e160d92@dizum.com>
MID: <8ef71d83a5af476e6e275ea23b984323@dizum.com>
Checkmate's so gay he repeatedly insists that a picture of a vagina is
actually an asshole and balls... he went on and on about assholes and
balls... couldn't shut up about them... come to find out, he was just
trying to tell us that his lost love was actually a man:
MID: <l84jo7$cnd$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l84oip$icu$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l85ste$ao$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l87aud$saf$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l88ptv$nlj$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8dvdt$tj2$4@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8kl20$91i$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8psgt$m7d$1@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l8rapv$rfm$3@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <l98brg$6hp$6@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <ldg914$pel$2@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <31e4747ee7179064b1fdd5266cd08d72@dizum.com>
Chimpy the neurotic overwrought hysterical hissy-fit ninny escalates
his prescription drug abuse to "calm the fuck down" (Chimpy's words):
MID: <512f192b17a529cc6d490a55c43ac1be@dizum.com> - Oxy, Neurontin
MID: <kjucol$ckr$3@newsfeed.x-privat.org> - Oxy, Vicodin
MID: <kmqoip$cg3$8@news.albasani.net> - Norco
MID: <knc9l2$e66$2@news.albasani.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6lnn79.ppd.17.10@news.alt.net> - Oxycodone, Vicodin
MID: <6lo0dt.b7.17.4@news.alt.net> - Xanax
MID: <krt925$u63$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <6o9mv7.7ra.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6os03j.f3.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6p12vg.of8.19.2@news.alt.net> - Marijuana
MID: <6pg2lv.v27.17.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <kuqmlq$mi7$1@news.mixmin.net> - Amphetamine (!)
MID: <6qprvj.ndm.17.1@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6r26ti.ju0.19.2@news.alt.net> - Vicodin
MID: <6stbk8.pbh.19.43@news.alt.net> - Ecstasy
MID: <l1b6g2$qr0$2@news.mixmin.net> - Vicodin
MID: <l5kd53$8kd$1@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <lanvc8$f06$2@news.mixmin.net> - Norco
MID: <larrim$lft$1@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <lcckii$mue$3@news.mixmin.net> - N2O
MID: <e7848d7ebc7f0b52e126bc35d82a65cf@dizum.com> - Hydrocodone,
Alprazolam
MID: <MPG.2eb9f496c779fc2998a54c@news.alt.net> - Percocet
Chimpy Checkmate's Famous Faggotisms:
=====================================
Chimpy's desperate plea to a dude:
MID: <5b690abba10d04da8f7675d278f2c2b8@dizum.com>
"Diddle me!"
MID: <07b50fac74279fabaf78a605899b7934@dizum.com>
"Trojans are a condiment."
Chimpy discusses his new boyfriend, Dave "SnuhWolf" Norris:
MID: <c565ada4723ca2e5cd1259cf8a1d86df@dizum.com>
"Snuhbaby makes a good cock warmer."
MID: <ffd2a514115a20cb3122e71b81907a1f@dizum.com>
"Pack your donut hole, any time, anywhere!"
Chimpy discussing the relative merits of 4 inches versus 10 inches:
MID: <b62ad5949e43f36901836bb59898426a@dizum.com>
"Plus, I suppose it doesn't hurt as much when they stuff it up your
butt."
MID: <MPG.2a5ec5516fc9605298b5ac@news.alt.net>
"Best you keester a kielbasa."
Message-ID: <kvvjjb$a8t$3@news.mixmin.net>
"Brag about it to my dick."
"My dick can't quite hear you, could you come a little closer?"
MID: <knnmmb$3a4$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If you see a dick, suck it."
MID: <6qft9a.g1f.19.1@news.alt.net>
"The Winchester 1892 would make a damned-good dildo."
MID: <l61jjg$tth$1@news.mixmin.net>
"Pump a rump."
MID: <l9d76m$k1v$4@news.mixmin.net>
"You gerbils are always in the dark."
MID: <lal84d$g2u$5@news.mixmin.net>
MID: <97bfaeca4f3abe27b5f6683e319cdb18@dizum.com>
"I gotta gay named Guido from Jersey"
MID: <lamgt8$b2d$1@news.mixmin.net>
"If they're soft, yer probably blowin' it all wrong."
MID: <lchub0$q96$5@news.mixmin.net>
"Hitler would have made a damned good Queen."
MID: <lcsgjb$obk$2@news.mixmin.net>
"Don't get slapped by the cocks you crave."
MID: <b068d280517a2d6c831d4a43f2cc8d31@dizum.com>
To a nearly toothless man:
"I wouldn't pay you to suck my dick if your last tooth fell out."
So Chimpy prefers paying *nearly* toothless men for blowjobs, but not
*fully* toothless men. LOL
MID: <afe97a65ff77e7382ad77cf18ea63e85@dizum.com>
"If I send you some money, will you suck Greg's dick?"
Chimpy likes to watch. LOL
MID: <9d7e6e672aa61c16813ade0f2815d0bf@dizum.com>
"Suck my clit."
Chimpy's proposition to a tranny sucking faggot who gets around being
gay by claiming tranny cocks are 'huge dangling clits'. LOL
=====================================
What a FAG!
Melt, Chimpy, melt.
Froth, Chimpy, froth.
Dance, Chimpy, dance!
<snicker>
/\ Properly known as Bill
\ /\ The Monster You Kooks Can't Handle
\ / \ THERE IS NO CABAL - LONG LIVE THE NEW CABAL
\/ The AUK coup is complete. The Old Cabal is no more.
Accept no substitutes...
if it's from Databasix, it's a sure bet it's from a kook.
databasix.com / PacketDerm, LLC / COTSE:
all branches of the same malignant tree.
Message-ID: <l7m8ig$1ld$7@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8jh$1le$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8lh$1le$9@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8ne$1ld$8@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8pc$1le$10@news.mixmin.net>
Message-ID: <l7m8rb$1ld$9@news.mixmin.net>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 23:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30518b8dcd9fa64b98adac@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518589 |
In article <8o4bq7.5qu.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > Checkmate, DoW #1 wrote: > > In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > > > > > >> > >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, > >> DoW #1 wrote: > >> > >>> In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >>> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >>> > >>>> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily > >>>> deserving of a KotM nomination. > >>>> > >>>> Any seconds? > >>> > >>> No, we don't do that shit here anymore. > >> > >> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even > >> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. > >> > >> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been > >> kinder to you than I'd have been. > > > > You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > > silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > > imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > > "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do > > so, would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing > > more > > than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > > is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > > calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > > desperately to cling to. > > > > Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically > > trying to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be > > thanking me for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, > > although I > > think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > > awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > > about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of > > mine would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's > > nothing > > you can do to stop the inevitable. > > > > > >>> How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, > >> > >> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last > >> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. > >> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may > >> have saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so > >> ungrateful? > > > > Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > > > > > >>> and not one seconded that I've seen. > >> > >> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different > >> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, > >> unlike you. > >> > >>> You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello > >>> squawk or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. > >> > >> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles > >> lysaght the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? > >> > >> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > > > > Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. > > and the checkmate gets the i have the biggest gang award yay! Where have you been? I haven't seen you in a coon's age. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 00:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <ms83v5$gu7$19@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #518587 |
In alt.usenet.kooks Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>,
> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says...
>
>
>>
>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW
>> #1 wrote:
>>
>> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>,
>> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says...
>> >
>> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>> >> deserving of a KotM nomination.
>> >>
>> >> Any seconds?
>> >
>> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore.
>>
>> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even
>> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks.
>>
>> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been
>> kinder to you than I'd have been.
>
> You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your
> silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your
> imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm
> "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do so,
> would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more
> than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really
> is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that
> calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so
> desperately to cling to.
So the guy that took the awards so serioulsy that he totally kooked out
is saying the awards don't matter while proving that they do?
> Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically trying
> to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me
> for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I
> think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that
> awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means
> about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine
> would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing
> you can do to stop the inevitable.
You poor thing.
>
>
>> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days,
>>
>> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last
>> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations.
>> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have
>> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful?
>
> Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me.
>
Yet you're slobbering all over it. Rick, get a grip.
>
>> > and not one seconded that I've seen.
>>
>> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different
>> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves,
>> unlike you.
>>
>> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello squawk
>> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking.
>>
>> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght
>> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates?
>>
>> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee.
>
> Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man.
Damn, PJR's got you reduced to threats? Hahahaha
--
gburnore at Panix dot Com
FNVW of A.U.K
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ?????????????????????????????????
| ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| ?????????????????????????????????
| ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
Bronx Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 19:06 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30514b108f850ce98ada7@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518626 |
In article <ms83v5$gu7$19@reader1.panix.com>, gburnore@panix.com says... > > In alt.usenet.kooks Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > > In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > > > > > >> > >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW > >> #1 wrote: > >> > >> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >> > > >> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily > >> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. > >> >> > >> >> Any seconds? > >> > > >> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. > >> > >> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even > >> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. > >> > >> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been > >> kinder to you than I'd have been. > > > > You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > > silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > > imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > > "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do so, > > would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more > > than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > > is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > > calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > > desperately to cling to. > > So the guy that took the awards so serioulsy that he totally kooked out > is saying the awards don't matter while proving that they do? > > > > Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically trying > > to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me > > for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I > > think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > > awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > > about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine > > would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing > > you can do to stop the inevitable. > > You poor thing. > > > > > > >> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, > >> > >> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last > >> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. > >> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have > >> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? > > > > Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > > > Yet you're slobbering all over it. Rick, get a grip. Oh, no! Did you accidentally let that "slip"? I just know you wouldn't do it on "purpose". > >> > and not one seconded that I've seen. > >> > >> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different > >> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, > >> unlike you. > >> > >> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello squawk > >> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. > >> > >> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght > >> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? > >> > >> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > > > > Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. > > Damn, PJR's got you reduced to threats? Hahahaha Only you would misconstrue that to be a threat. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Ms Kitty, DoW # 6" <kitty@meow.mix> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 23:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <8o7tcn.qdq.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518631 |
"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message news:MPG.30514b108f850ce98ada7@news.altopia.com... > In article <ms83v5$gu7$19@reader1.panix.com>, gburnore@panix.com says... > > >> >> In alt.usenet.kooks Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: >> > In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> > >> > >> >> >> >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW >> >> #1 wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, >> >> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... >> >> > >> >> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily >> >> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. >> >> >> >> >> >> Any seconds? >> >> > >> >> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. >> >> >> >> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even >> >> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. >> >> >> >> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been >> >> kinder to you than I'd have been. >> > >> > You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your >> > silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your >> > imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm >> > "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do >> > so, >> > would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more >> > than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really >> > is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that >> > calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so >> > desperately to cling to. >> >> So the guy that took the awards so serioulsy that he totally kooked out >> is saying the awards don't matter while proving that they do? >> >> >> > Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically >> > trying >> > to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me >> > for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I >> > think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that >> > awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means >> > about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine >> > would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing >> > you can do to stop the inevitable. >> >> You poor thing. >> >> > >> > >> >> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, >> >> >> >> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last >> >> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. >> >> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have >> >> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? >> > >> > Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. >> > >> Yet you're slobbering all over it. Rick, get a grip. > > Oh, no! Did you accidentally let that "slip"? I just know you wouldn't > do it on "purpose". Just like cujo's Rhonda did to me. > > >> >> > and not one seconded that I've seen. >> >> >> >> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different >> >> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, >> >> unlike you. >> >> >> >> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello >> >> > squawk >> >> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. >> >> >> >> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght >> >> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? >> >> >> >> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. >> > >> > Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. >> >> Damn, PJR's got you reduced to threats? Hahahaha > > Only you would misconstrue that to be a threat. Peter is out of cards. Game over.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 22:00 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.3052c558af93f0b998adcb@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518835 |
In article <8o7tcn.qdq.19.1@news.alt.net>, kitty@meow.mix says... > > "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote in message > news:MPG.30514b108f850ce98ada7@news.altopia.com... > > In article <ms83v5$gu7$19@reader1.panix.com>, gburnore@panix.com says... > > > > > >> > >> In alt.usenet.kooks Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > >> > In article <slrnmuehuo.88r.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:12:55 -0700, Checkmate, DoW > >> >> #1 wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > >> >> > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > >> >> > > >> >> >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily > >> >> >> deserving of a KotM nomination. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Any seconds? > >> >> > > >> >> > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. > >> >> > >> >> Most of "you" (plural) don't, because most of "you" aren't even > >> >> allowed to vote, being award-winning kooks. > >> >> > >> >> "You" (singular) are still allowed to vote, because the FNVW has been > >> >> kinder to you than I'd have been. > >> > > >> > You take this shit WAY too seriously, Peter. You actually think your > >> > silly little game matters. Do you have a real life, or is your > >> > imaginary power trip here the full extent of it? Whether or not I'm > >> > "allowed" to vote, I've already stated that I refuse to vote. To do > >> > so, > >> > would only serve to lend credibility to what amounts to nothing more > >> > than a pathetic joke that you can't even recognize for what it really > >> > is. I represent far more members of this group than you do, so that > >> > calls into question any notions of "legitimacy" that you're trying so > >> > desperately to cling to. > >> > >> So the guy that took the awards so serioulsy that he totally kooked out > >> is saying the awards don't matter while proving that they do? > >> > >> > >> > Now that I've called you out on your bullshit, you're frantically > >> > trying > >> > to breathe life back into a dying tradition. You should be thanking me > >> > for lighting a fire under all 3 or 4 of your dead asses, although I > >> > think you already realize it's a lost cause. I can assure you that > >> > awards given out by the less-than-a handful of you true ko0ks means > >> > about as much to me as any awards the ten registered supporters of mine > >> > would have to you. Nothing lasts forever, Peter, and there's nothing > >> > you can do to stop the inevitable. > >> > >> You poor thing. > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > How many "nominations" have you spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, > >> >> > >> >> I made five nominations in the last week of August, because the last > >> >> week of the month is the traditional time for making nominations. > >> >> Three of those five don't involve you, and my KotM nomination may have > >> >> saved you from winning the award yourself. Why are you so ungrateful? > >> > > >> > Because you have done nothing that holds any legitimate value to me. > >> > > >> Yet you're slobbering all over it. Rick, get a grip. > > > > Oh, no! Did you accidentally let that "slip"? I just know you wouldn't > > do it on "purpose". > > Just like cujo's Rhonda did to me. Butt Rot beat him to it, but nobody believed him anyway. My real name is Dick Stuckey. > >> >> > and not one seconded that I've seen. > >> >> > >> >> All five have been seconded, by a total of at least three different > >> >> people, none of whom have won any Usenet Kook Awards themselves, > >> >> unlike you. > >> >> > >> >> > You should take a mental health break, Peter. Go make that cello > >> >> > squawk > >> >> > or something. It's gotta sound better that YOUR squawking. > >> >> > >> >> Did you get the idea that I'm a cellist directly from chuckles lysaght > >> >> the dead paedophile, or through one or more intermediates? > >> >> > >> >> Keep whining, Darth Bawl nominee. > >> > > >> > Keep clutching at straws, Dead Man. > >> > >> Damn, PJR's got you reduced to threats? Hahahaha > > > > Only you would misconstrue that to be a threat. > > Peter is out of cards. Game over. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 09:39 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <mm7jua1ji6n9u50a42bv9mnunu2isj6921@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #518839 |
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:00:49 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: >Butt Rot beat him to it, but nobody believed him anyway. My real name >is Dick Stuckey. And, my real name is Stuck Dickey. (It always gets stuck because it's just way too large.) -- Sir Gregory
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "%" <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-04 08:15 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <8o91q5.cd0.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #518880 |
Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 22:00:49 -0700, "Checkmate, DoW #1" > <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> wrote: > > >> Butt Rot beat him to it, but nobody believed him anyway. My real >> name >> is Dick Stuckey. > > > And, my real name is Stuck Dickey. (It always gets stuck > because it's just way too large.) but that doesn't make you gay it makes stuck gay
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-03 00:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <ms83lr$gu7$18@reader1.panix.com> |
| In reply to | #518317 |
In alt.usenet.kooks Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote:
> In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>,
> peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says...
>
>
>>
>> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in
>> > <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net>
>> > embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air:
>> >
>> >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>> >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G>
>> >>>
>> >>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>> >>
>> >> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>> >>
>> >> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the
>> >> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>> >>
>> >> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to
>> >> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the
>> >> ground first?
>> >
>> > Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard.
>> >
>> >>> No radiation.
>> >>
>> >> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy,
>> >> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it. Here, I
>> >> can even repost that post here:
>> >>
>> >> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>> >>
>> >> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>> >> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>> >> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>> >> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>> >> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>> >>
>> >> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are
>> >> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed
>> >
>> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit.
>> >
>> > "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international
>> > news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis."
>> >
>> > Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were
>> > let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes.
>> >
>> >><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out:
>> > https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation>
>> >
>> > No nuke, Rocky/Michael
>> > No my name is not Michael and it never has been. You have
>> > been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
>>
>> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily
>> deserving of a KotM nomination.
>>
>> Any seconds?
>
> No, we don't do that shit here anymore. How many "nominations" have you
> spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, and not one seconded that I've seen.
Covering your eyes? hahaha.
--
gburnore at Panix dot Com
FNVW of A.U.K
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ?????????????????????????????????
| ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| ?????????????????????????????????
| ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
| Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-02 19:02 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nomination - Rocky for KotM, August 2015 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.30514a11e299d0a298ada6@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #518625 |
In article <ms83lr$gu7$18@reader1.panix.com>, gburnore@panix.com says... > > In alt.usenet.kooks Checkmate, DoW #1 <Lunatic.Fringe@the.edge> wrote: > > In article <slrnmu9kcc.a1o.peadar.ruadh@pjr.no-ip.org>, > > peadar.ruadh@gmx.com says... > > > > > >> > >> In alt.usenet.kooks on Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:22:57 +2400, Kadaitcha Man > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:17:02 -0500 in > >> > <IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com>, Rocky <wookiee@att.net> > >> > embraced their wilted jingleberries and blew hot air: > >> > > >> >> "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > >> >> news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com... > >> >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G> > >> >>> > >> >>> No EMP since the comms still worked. > >> >> > >> >> ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before. > >> >> > >> >> What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the > >> >> AM receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper. > >> >> > >> >> FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to > >> >> a satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the > >> >> ground first? > >> > > >> > Erm, quality of signal for one, kooktard. > >> > > >> >>> No radiation. > >> >> > >> >> Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy, > >> >> alt.conspiracy and sci.physics to prove you are full of it. Here, I > >> >> can even repost that post here: > >> >> > >> >> "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed > >> >> > >> >> A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now > >> >> confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event," > >> >> but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York, > >> >> radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem > >> >> cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo." > >> >> > >> >> BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are > >> >> smart enough to figure out where the link really ends. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> <http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed > >> > > >> > BWAHAHAHAHAHAH! presstv is an Iranian outfit. > >> > > >> > "Press TV takes revolutionary steps as the first Iranian international > >> > news network, broadcasting in English on a round-the-clock basis." > >> > > >> > Oh, and that page also discredits your claim that underground nukes were > >> > let off. The page claims nukes were onboard the planes. > >> > > >> >><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out: > >> > https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation> > >> > > >> > No nuke, Rocky/Michael > >> > No my name is not Michael and it never has been. You have > >> > been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky > >> > >> Rocky is the kookiest kook I've seem for a long time, and easily > >> deserving of a KotM nomination. > >> > >> Any seconds? > > > > No, we don't do that shit here anymore. How many "nominations" have you > > spewed out in the last 2 or 3 days, and not one seconded that I've seen. > > Covering your eyes? hahaha. Covering your ass? hahaha. -- Checkmate, AUK DoW #1 Official AUK Award Giver-Outer Copyright © 2015 all rights reserved
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 08:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah |
| Message-ID | <c49f0f340767aaff20cd91ff15e73256@dizum.com> |
| In reply to | #517746 |
Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker> Rocky (aka Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC), in <news:IeGdndY4x-bj1n_InZ2dnUU7-W-dnZ2d@giganews.com> did thusly jump head first into the wood chipper again: > "Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message > news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, Rocky (aka >> Michael S. Guthrie of 6913 Maynard Road, Summerfield, NC) >> <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G> Bullshit. ALL of the evidence proves there were no nukes. Moron. LOL >> No EMP since the comms still worked. > ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before. Yeah, your magical "clean nukes" that somehow leave behind no radioactive fallout and leave no EMP such that all electronic devices continue working. LOL The first ever nuke in the history of mankind to exhibit such behavior. Moron. LOL > What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the AM > receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper. Bwahahahaaa! There was no "AM receiver", you retard. It was a VHF receiver on a mobile satellite relay truck. Which you had no clue about until I told you about it, at which time your kooky conspiracy theory changed yet again, thereby proving that it cannot reflect reality. There was no "nuclear EMP", you idiot. There were several instances of satellite uplink interference, nothing more. The *only* EMP that day was from the fuel in the planes exploding as they hit the towers, and that was so weak it only caused a slight momentary disruption of camera footage. You're just a paranoid-delusional schizophrenic off his meds, Michael S. Guthrie. Take your meds, Mike. Moron. LOL > FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to a > satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the ground > first? It didn't "go straight to a satellite from a helicopter" because it couldn't. Helicopters until just this year had blade interference that prevented direct-to-satellite transmission (Hughes has found a solution to this problem early in 2015), so they transmitted via *VHF* and an *omnidirectional* antenna to a truck-based satellite relay, so all the WCBS video (in fact, all CBS affiliate video) could be patched in nationwide at a moment's notice. That is, after all, why they use satellite feeds instead of local-only transmission. Moron. LOL >> No radiation. > Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy > and sci.physics to prove you are full of it. Here, I can even repost that > post here: > > "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed There is no "nuke cancer", you moron. As has already been patiently explained to you, it was found by the NIH that the leukemia and slightly elevated instances of cancer amongst WTC first responders and cleanup workers is due to the asbestos in the rubble. Moron. LOL > A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy And that's all it is, a conspiracy... kooks blathering on about shit they know nothing about. No EMP, no radioactive fallout or radioactive byproducts from nuclear detonation, no seismic signatures consistent with nukes, no radiation burns, no radiation sickness, no Geiger counters registering anything but slightly elevated beta radiation from the aircraft exit signs and LEO weapons sights... therefore, no nukes. You're just a paranoid delusional schizophrenic off his meds, Michael Scott Guthrie. Take your meds, Mike. Moron. LOL > ha<SMACKAKOOK!> Moron. LOL > Rocky Now, get to addressing the 20 ways your kook conspiracy theory violates the laws of physics: ====================================================== 1) Your estimation of the time between detonation and the time of collapse puts the nukes between from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep below the towers, a depth we don't even have the technology to drill to today, let alone back in 1968. Not to mention the fact that at that depth, the temperature is so high things like metal *melt*. That's *why* we can't drill much deeper than the 7.636 miles of the Al Shaheen oil well in Qatar (the deepest hole *ever* dug in human history)... the equipment fails. That's why the Kola Superdeep Borehole was abandoned at 7.619 miles deep. 2) The claimed "EMP pulse" in the WCBS video *you* provided wasn't an EMP pulse at all, it was satellite uplink interference. If it'd been a nuke EMP (especially one sized 150 kt), the nanosecond time frame of the explosion (and thus the sharp peak of the EMP) would have caused the camera's electronics to burn out. No amount of shielding would have been sufficient to prevent that. That there is video of the immediate aftermath proves there was no nuke, especially one sized your claimed 150 kt, which would have destroyed all electronics for dozens of miles radius. 3) The radiation experienced was of such short duration that there's no way it was neutron or gamma bombardment from a nuke. If it had been from a nuke the metal in the buildings would have shown high levels of radioactivity for decades. It was found to be beta radiation from the tritium in the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapon sights that was the source. That you're gullible enough not to know that a nuke would spread radiation far and wide is testament to how delusional you are. 4) No nuclear detonation byproducts were found at the WTC complex or anywhere in NYC (MID: <e62c14c89ab831a63f27243e265c711a@dizum.com>). They found tritium from the aircraft exit signs and law enforcement weapons sites, radium from industrial sources unrelated to nuclear weapons and background levels for all other sources of radiation. 5) The seismic waves caused by a small 150 kt nuke wouldn't be sufficient to drop the buildings, it'd barely even be felt by people in the vicinity, especially with the bombs buried, as you k'lamed, from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* deep. It would take on the order of 2 MEGAtons to do so, especially at the depths you k'lame the bombs were buried. 6) The trigger that sets off the nuclear explosion is a neutron source. It naturally radioactively decays over time, and its decay byproducts, the elements the neutron source transmutes into as it decays, include xenon, which is a neutron absorber. It's called xenon poisoning. Any bomb that has sat for 33 years without its trigger being replenished will not have a trigger that is viable to start any sort of nuclear chain reaction. 7) I've provided a video from *inside* one of the towers *as* *it* *was* *collapsing*, showing the vibration from the buckling vertical support column and *NO* EMP: ====================== <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xYjoSvzWeo> You'll note the massive shaking from the central support column buckling, but *NO* EMP. And that was INSIDE the WTC tower. No amount of shielding would have saved that camera from a nuke EMP. ====================== 8) Why aren't you explaining how those supposed nukes were going to survive at a depth of 37.28 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 960 degrees F) to 96.93 miles (where the temperature would be approximately 1840 degrees F), Ko0K? 9) Explain how a nuclear weapon can direct its explosion through a hole without any of the compressive blast going out into surrounding rock. 10) Explain how 19 nukes (according to you, another leap of logic taken by your broken brain to explain away the 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the video *you* provided) were detonated at the WTC complex in rapid succession, yet no ill effects were experienced by electronics, the electrical grid or aircraft. 11) Why aren't you explaining how the personnel you claim were sent down to service those nukes (because now that you know the neutron-source triggers for nuclear weapons require replacement on a periodic basis, your broken brain *had* to construct an entire facility at 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep (far deeper than we have the technology to dig even today, let alone back in 1968), complete with "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained", or your brain would have been forced to admit it was wrong when it told you those nukes sat untouched for 33 years and maintained their viability) are supposed to survive in 960 to 1840 degree heat? 12) You admitted (MID:<ed75e9d6f7ccf7296c075fd695673a37@dizum.com>) that all the materials used in construction of the twin towers (all 1.5 million tons of it) had been accounted for and trucked off to the Fresh Kills landfill. How will you reconcile your admission with your kook blather that significant percentages of the buildings "vaporized" (your word) and "floated toward Europe" (your words)? 13) Why can't you provide proof of the nuclear explosion seismic signatures for these 19 nukes you k'lame were detonated at the WTC site on 11 Sep 2001? 14) Where were the vertically-directed plumes of dust and debris kicked up from your claimed nuclear weapons being detonated deep underground, Ko0K? 15) Explain how the 19 nukes you claimed to have existed could have tunneled holes from the underground installation 37.28 to 96.93 miles deep that you claimed to have existed, to directly under the WTC complex... in 12 seconds... through solid bedrock... prior to detonating directly below the WTC towers (which, of course, fucks up your timing between the detonations you claim took place (for which you used the WCBS video, claiming the satellite uplink interference was "EMP") and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started. Congratulations, Dimwit, you've made the full circuit on The Island of Insanity. Now go 'round again.). 16) Explain why you're now saying there were 34 nukes (MID:<345fee8b286a91037bc806ed589d182d@dizum.com>), as opposed to your previously k'lamed 19 nukes (and your previously, previously k'lamed 3 nukes)... would it be because your broken little brain is squirming under the scorching twin beams of truth and reality, screaming in agony at its being forced to see just how delusional it truly is? While you're at it, get to explaining how the regular rad sweeps (radiological surveys) at the twin towers (because the space was primarily rented by government agencies) showed no nukes or any contamination whatsoever, and how 34 nukes were obtained and put in place without drawing any attention whatsoever. Of course, this *still* fucks up your timing between the detonations (ie: your claimed "EMP" on the WCBS video) and the collapses, leading you back to where your delusion started... that unresolvable logic hole rears its ugly head again. LOL 17) Your broken brain is yet again expanding your delusion with your "34 or more nukes" blather (you're now saying there were 65 nukes (MID: <984122ddbf1e4e5d6f5a7b3f56eeeb6f@dizum.com>))... eventually, your broken brain will be telling you that NYC today is a CGI and the real city was blown up by 1,592,629,490,173,371,449,138,916,004,581,949 intelligent nano-nukes which autonomously dug their way up from their secret underground MoleMan base 15,682,941 miles below the surface of our hollow planet and attached themselves to every steel part of every building in NYC and vaporized them and they all floated down to MoleVille, and the fact that the EMP from all those nukes detonating at once didn't burn out every electrical generating station, electrical substation, every piece of electronic equipment, every vehicle, every aircraft... that's *proof* that NYC is a CGI today! LOL 18) Explain how a nuclear weapon wouldn't have nuclear detonation byproducts with the right nuclear trigger, according to your words "with the right detonator you could have a 'clean' nuke" (MID: <43acc7488b179f3bfea83ef7076f92b9@dizum.com>). 19) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. 20) Now you're saying the Ogallala Aquifer is radioactive (what's that got to do with the WTC?)... with absolutely no proof... all you have is the paranoid delusional rantings of other schizophrenics like you. Do you see how utterly ridiculous you're beginning to sound? Get back on your meds, you delusional loon. ====================================================== There are now 20 ways your kook konspiracy theory violates the laws of physics... now you'd better get to work addressing each one, point by point, or people are gonna know you're just a retard who can't grasp simple physics. Kook. LOL -- ------------------------------------ Michael Scott Guthrie (aka Rocky) 336-643-6611 6913 Maynard Road Summerfield, NC 27358-9206 Now that everyone knows who you are, they can get you the psychiatric help you so desperately need. Perhaps they could call your mother Paula S. Guthrie, given that you're in your 30's and you still live at home with mommy... and Grandma Martha. LOL Your brother Scott certainly won't be happy to know you're embarrassing the Guthrie family name, how's he gonna find real estate clients if everyone knows the Guthries are a pack of schizo kooks? LOL Just how many backwoods redneck hillbillies can fit in one small 1200 sf 3bd/1.5 ba house?! Does RockyRetard share a bedroom with his brother? Or do they make Grandma Martha sleep on the porch? LOL ------------------------------------ Michael Guthrie (aka Rocky), your brain is grasping at straws in trying to avoid admitting *you* *are* *wrong*, and as your brain becomes more and more desperate to avoid the truth we promulgate (which utterly demolishes your kook conspiracy theory), it makes larger and larger leaps of illogic. For instance: ============================= A) You said the satellite uplink inteference seen in the WCBS video *you* *provided* was a nuke EMP, so your broken brain told you they must have buried nukes under the twin towers. Being a simpleton, you believed they just dug shallow holes, dropped the nukes in, smoothed over the concrete and walked away for 33 years. B) Your timing on the WCBS video *you* *provided* between the satellite uplink interference (what you deemed to be a "nuke EMP") and the tower falling being 12 seconds (it was actually 14 seconds, but kooks can't count) means your supposed nukes had to have been buried from 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* below the surface (dependent upon soil composition and thus speed of compressive blast transmission). Never mind that we don't have the technology to drill that deep even today, let alone in 1968. Your broken brain had to yet again change your kooky little conspiracy theory to at least try to orient itself at some acute angle to reality. So no "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years" anymore, now it was "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years". C) You're such a simpleton you didn't realize nukes require periodic replacement of their neutron-source trigger, which naturally radioactively decays over time, building up the decay byproduct xenon, which absorbs neutrons. It's called xenon poisoning. So your broken brain told you that someone had to service those nukes to keep the triggers viable... which means your broken brain was thus *forced* to change from "dug a shallow hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "dug an impossibly deep hole, dropped the nukes in, covered it up, walked away for 33 years", to "built an entire *facility* impossibly deep under the WTC, complete with service personnel and" "4 blast doors to keep the explosion from getting back into the area the nukes were maintained" (your words). D) Your broken brain then said there were 19 nukes instead of your original 3, because you knew there were 19 instances of satellite uplink interference in the WCBS video *you* *provided*, in which you k'lamed one of the instances of satellite uplink interference was an EMP. And if you k'lame one of them is an EMP, they *all* must be EMPs, so your broken brain now tells you there were 19 nukes detonated in rapid succession... completely ignoring the fact that even one nuke detonation would plunge the city into darkness due to EMP burning out electrical substations, and completely ignoring the fact that no nuclear detonation byproducts were found in the rubble, in the vicinity of the rubble, or anywhere in NYC. E) Now that your broken brain was convinced that the nukes were buried deeply, of course, they had a very wide blast radius, which screwed up your kooky k'lame that they were used to demolish WTC1 and WTC2, but somehow missed WTC3 and WTC4... so your broken brain conceived that the nuclear weapons could somehow dig themselves up from that miles-deep facility to just below the WTC towers prior to exploding, in order to make their cone of destruction smaller. Nevermind that your broken brain said they dug through 37.28 to 96.93 *miles* of *solid* *bedrock* in *12* *seconds*. LOL F) So I've led you by the nose in a full circle... if those bombs your broken brain is telling you existed *did* dig their way up to underneath the WTC twin towers before detonating (they didn't... first because there were no nukes, second because it'd be impossible, but for the sake of argument, we'll continue), that leads right back to your calculation of the time between your claimed "EMP" (the satellite uplink interference on the WCBS video *you* *provided*) and the time the buildings fell, which is pretty much where we started. So I've proven by drop-kicking your retarded ass around the perimeter of sanity full-circle that you're insane. LOL G) Realizing the utter ridiculousness of your kook blather above, your broken brain has backpedaled and expanded your delusion even more as a desperate attempt at attaining some semblance of plausibility... saying there were 34 mini-nukes, and they were within and underneath the twin towers. If those 34 nukes you claim existed *did* explode, where are the nuclear detonation byproducts? The highly radioactive metal? The radiation burns and radiation sickness of people in the vicinity? Where are the nuclear detonation signature seismographs? Why did the electrical grid, all electronics and all vehicles survive not just one but *34* nuclear EMPs? And what about that timing between the WCBS video satellite uplink interference (what you claimed was "EMP") and the shaking and collapse of the tower? That's now off by 14 whole seconds, just as it was when your kooky conspiracy theory began. LOL H) Now you're saying the OKC bombing was nuclear in nature (MID: <e3f0e4f638e69c3db43076c8b842db91@dizum.com>), and a new era of widespread nuclear terrorism has arrived... proof positive that you're off your meds, Mike. IOW, your broken brain is far too stupid to discern fantasy from reality, so you've caught yourself in an unresolvable logic hole. And the harder you try to resolve it, the more you run around in little tard-circles, banging your head with your fist and doing your very best Rainman impersonation. I can twist your brain into a Gordian Knot with my knowledge. And I've just barely even started, I haven't even worked up a sweat yet. ============================= Kook. LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-08-30 04:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: NUCLEAR TERRORISM IS HERE 2 Sarah |
| Message-ID | <frj5uahth9m9ulb4ufkjboori8bcgs0bhk@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #517746 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 19:16:12 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>"Sarah Ehrett" <ninety7gt@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:g5g4ua11jlqd8ddu1fsjmugb96jd064rtu@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:56:50 -0500, "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>>
>>>So a preponderous of the evidence still says NUKES. <G>
>>
>> No EMP since the comms still worked.
>
>ROTFLMAO because we have been over this before.
>
But you still can't accept the truth. This is sad.
>What caught the EMP exactly when the ground shook under WTC1 was the AM
You mean FM, or as was the case at the time, VHF.
>receiver that was receiving the broadcast from the WCBS chopper.
>
There was no EMP. Had there been one, the camera would have been
fried, the receiver would have been fried, the helicopters would have
all come crashing down, and the electrical grid would have shut down.
>FFN tries to say it was satellite interference but why go straight to a
>satellite from a helicopter without going to an AM receiver on the ground
>first?
>
Since you're lying about what he stated, the real question is...
What aspect of your mental illness causes you to think lying will
benefit you?
>
>> No radiation.
>
>Bullshit and I just started another thread on alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy
>and sci.physics to prove you are full of it. Here, I can even repost that
>post here:
>
>"Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed
>
Still no radiation. Other than standard background radiation and
insignificant radiation from EXIT signs.
>A new and terrifying 9/11 conspiracy has hit the news. We are now
>confronted, not only with startling proof that 9/11 was a "nuclear event,"
>but that there have been thousands of unreported deaths in New York,
>radiation cancers and nearly 70,000 being kept alive with experimental stem
>cell therapy and physically devastating "chemo."
>
>BTW if the following links gets run together somehow I hope you are smart
>enough to figure out where the link really ends.
>
> ><http://presstv.com/detail/2014/04/21/359423/nuke-cancer-from-911-revealed><And to see more evidence of radiation at Ground Zero check out: https://www.google.com/search?q=9%2F11+radiation> No nuke, Rocky/MichaelNo my name is not Michael and it never has been. You have been fooled bythe Friendly Neighbor Nut/Liar.Rocky
Learn how to reply with proper quoting. Or is this inability
another aspect of your blatantly obvious mental illness?
--
Shill #3. Current Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web