Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #703635 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 45 participants
Thread has 1097 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1097 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-29 15:43 -0700
Double-A, Nov 2008. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 17:06 -0700
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:34 -0400
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:54 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:15 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-24 15:34 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
"God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
"God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:33 -0700
An IQ of 185. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 06:41 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
Page 6 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 50 Next page →
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <k34crdl0l953m62j9lsfvs3t107kv3s1jv@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #706020 |
Sergio wrote: >did you note it in a book ? >did you note it in a pan ? >did you note it on a fish ? >did you note it in a van ? > >I don't see it anywhere, I don't care where you note it, chrisv, man, > >Did you use a pen ? >did you use a pencil ? >did you use a crayon ? >did you use a bit of chalk? > >I don't see it anywhere, I don't care where you note it, chrisv, man, > >[accept the possibility that you have been eating so called "free range" >chickens that only had their feet tied together with shoelaces, and they >had to live on their sides all their short life of only 6 weeks! ] 6 weeks? Actually, the subect is eggs from cage-free chickens. I do "accept the possibility". I do realize that the world has scumbags, cheats, and liars aplenty. But, in my quest for knowledge, the say-so of a usenet kook is not enough. I will give you bonus points for the rap, though. -- "The middle 32 characters look very random - but it looks like you stop at the letter 'f'. * why stop at letter f?" - DumFSck, putting his ignorance on display
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pp5ka3$8tr$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #706108 |
On 10/4/2018 8:14 AM, chrisv wrote: > Sergio wrote: > >> did you note it in a book ? >> did you note it in a pan ? >> did you note it on a fish ? >> did you note it in a van ? >> >> I don't see it anywhere, I don't care where you note it, chrisv, man, >> >> Did you use a pen ? >> did you use a pencil ? >> did you use a crayon ? >> did you use a bit of chalk? >> >> I don't see it anywhere, I don't care where you note it, chrisv, man, >> >> [accept the possibility that you have been eating so called "free range" >> chickens that only had their feet tied together with shoelaces, and they >> had to live on their sides all their short life of only 6 weeks! ] > > 6 weeks? Actually, the subect is eggs from cage-free chickens. > > I do "accept the possibility". I do realize that the world has > scumbags, cheats, and liars aplenty. But, in my quest for knowledge, > the say-so of a usenet kook is not enough. > > I will give you bonus points for the rap, though. > eggs... whoops, missed that. (forget the feet thing) anyhow, accumulating knowledge of science in sci.physics (called the ROS by Uncle Al) is a true art.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361604cdf0fe35c2994c6b@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #704714 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <PEPqD.180429$4S3.125720@fx47.iad>, silver@slim.er says... > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 08:17:37 -0500, chrisv wrote: > > > SilverSlimer wrote: > > > >>I'm just saddened that you don't want to actively aid in suppressing the > >>hold they have over the marketplace. > > > > By refusing to use them? There are just too many battles, too many evil > > bastards, to use that response, in all cases. > > > > I try to have a reasonable, balanced response to the issues that concern > > me. I buy cage-free eggs, but I'm not going to stop eating chickens. > > Cage-free is a lie, by the way. Why would you even need to keep an egg in a cage? -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <g0scauFqeotU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704330 |
On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >> benj wrote: >> >>> chrisv wrote: >>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>> >>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>> >>>> Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. >>> >>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in >>> charge of it this time? >> >> YA stupid right-winger. >> >>> I think that's called insane. >> >> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? > > As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour of > corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the > views of conservative individuals? I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what political side you are on. > Similarly, are you in favour of > corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from > doing business? They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not obligated to enable him to cause harm. You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor does Alex Jones. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pob19e$crd$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704344 |
On 9/24/2018 9:57 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: >> >>> benj wrote: >>> >>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>> >>>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>> >>>>> Let me guess:Â You're a stupid right-winger. >>>> >>>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are >>>> put in >>>> charge of it this time? >>> >>> YA stupid right-winger. >>> >>>> I think that's called insane. >>> >>> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? >> >> As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour of >> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >> views of conservative individuals? > > I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of > service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of > Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was > warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. > > NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what > political side you are on. bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? Harvard, UTexas and others > >> Similarly, are you in favour of >> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >> doing business? > > They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not > obligated to enable him to cause harm. > > You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor > does Alex Jones. > Jones is entertainment dude, not news,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <g0sigtFrp5aU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704356 |
On 9/24/18 8:52 AM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/24/2018 9:57 AM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>> >>>> benj wrote: >>>> >>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>>>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>>>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me guess:Â You're a stupid right-winger. >>>>> >>>>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are >>>>> put in >>>>> charge of it this time? >>>> >>>> YA stupid right-winger. >>>> >>>>> I think that's called insane. >>>> >>>> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? >>> >>> As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour of >>> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >>> views of conservative individuals? >> >> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was >> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >> >> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >> political side you are on. > > bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). > Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? > Harvard, UTexas and others While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >>> doing business? >> >> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >> >> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >> does Alex Jones. >> > Jones is entertainment dude, not news, The news is entertainment these days... but either way, NOBODY is obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pobaum$v9e$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704369 |
On 9/24/2018 11:43 AM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 8:52 AM, Sergio wrote: >> On 9/24/2018 9:57 AM, Snit wrote: >>> On 9/24/18 5:35 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: >>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: >>>> >>>>> benj wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> chrisv wrote: >>>>>>> Skeeter wrote: >>>>>>>> kkensington01 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and >>>>>>>>> rob the >>>>>>>>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Let me guess:Â You're a stupid right-winger. >>>>>> >>>>>> Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are >>>>>> put in >>>>>> charge of it this time? >>>>> >>>>> YA stupid right-winger. >>>>> >>>>>> I think that's called insane. >>>>> >>>>> Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? >>>> >>>> As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in >>>> favour of >>>> corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring the >>>> views of conservative individuals? >>> >>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was >>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>> >>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>> political side you are on. >> >> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? > > Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such > bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not > relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? Facebook? They need to be regulated. > >> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? >> Harvard, UTexas and others > > While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a > BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the > discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. no, it is not. those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you are out, if black you are in. That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > >>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >>>> doing business? >>> >>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>> >>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>> does Alex Jones. >>> >> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, > > The news is entertainment these days... agree, only way they can get make a profit. but either way, NOBODY is > obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. CNN hatred of Trump ? left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? Hillary's hatred of Men ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <g0ss3bFtoi7U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704387 |
On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: ... >>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules and was >>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>> >>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>> political side you are on. >>> >>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >> >> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). > > who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? > Facebook? They need to be regulated. They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to apply here. >>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their skin ? >>> Harvard, UTexas and others >> >> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. > > no, it is not. > those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you > are out, if black you are in. > > That is clear institutionalized bigotry. From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I ignored the deeper issues. But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why it is done but I do not approve of it. >>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >>>>> doing business? >>>> >>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>> >>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>> does Alex Jones. >>>> >>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >> >> The news is entertainment these days... > > agree, only way they can get make a profit. With Google you are the product. Same with the news. > but either way, NOBODY is >> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. > > CNN hatred of Trump ? > left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. > Hillary's hatred of Men ? He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back them kicking her off. Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal rights over special entitlements. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <bk83pt.t5m.17.22@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #704398 |
On 2018-09-24 12:26 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: > ... >>>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules >>>>> and was >>>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>>> >>>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>>> political side you are on. >>>> >>>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >>> >>> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >>> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >>> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). >> >> who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? >> Facebook?  They need to be regulated. > > They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a > discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to > apply here. > >>>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their >>>> skin ? >>>> Harvard, UTexas and others >>> >>> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >>> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >>> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >> >> no, it is not. >> those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you >> are out, if black you are in. >> >> That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > > From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. > Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I > ignored the deeper issues. > > But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why > it is done but I do not approve of it. > >>>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones >>>>>> from >>>>>> doing business? >>>>> >>>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>>> >>>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>>> does Alex Jones. >>>>> >>>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >>> >>> The news is entertainment these days... >> >> agree, only way they can get make a profit. > > With Google you are the product. Same with the news. > >>  but either way, NOBODY is >>> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. >> >> CNN hatred of Trump ? >> left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? > > If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or > Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I > would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. > >> Hillary's hatred of Men ? > > He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose > those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly > to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those > of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back > them kicking her off. > > Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal > rights over special entitlements. > > hey its snit , what's happening snit
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pobn41$1jf5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #704398 |
On 9/24/2018 2:26 PM, Snit wrote: > On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: > ... >>>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules >>>>> and was >>>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>>> >>>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>>> political side you are on. >>>> >>>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >>> >>> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >>> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >>> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). >> >> who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? >> Facebook?  They need to be regulated. > > They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a > discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to > apply here. yes, it obviously does and is. Congress has hauled them up to testify several times now, and the DOJ is getting involved. you should know this. > >>>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their >>>> skin ? >>>> Harvard, UTexas and others >>> >>> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >>> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >>> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >> >> no, it is not. >> those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you >> are out, if black you are in. >> >> That is clear institutionalized bigotry. > > From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. try not to be naive and shallow. If a college rejects you because of the *color of your skin*, that is institutionalized bigotry. > Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I > ignored the deeper issues. 'balancing factor' is simply an excuse to continue institutionalized Racism, to meet a numbers goal for statisticians. > > But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why > it is done but I do not approve of it. I reject it, it is racism, pure and simple. > >>>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones >>>>>> from >>>>>> doing business? >>>>> >>>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>>> >>>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>>> does Alex Jones. >>>>> >>>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >>> >>> The news is entertainment these days... >> >> agree, only way they can get make a profit. > > With Google you are the product. Same with the news. Google is worse than we thought. note that a majority of web pages have a line of java script back to Google. Google is worse than we think, they update their database with our IP, time, date, what webpage, and duration. Facebook has a lot out there, and Twitter has many too [I use NoScript, and it shows the JS as it blocks it, no google JS is needed to run the page] > >>  but either way, NOBODY is >>> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. >> >> CNN hatred of Trump ? >> left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? > > If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or > Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I > would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. > >> Hillary's hatred of Men ? > > He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose > those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly > to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those > of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back > them kicking her off. usa media has a lot more blatent bias than many countries, I think that is because our media follows british media. (to capture reader interest) but then other countries have only one sided media (Saudi Arabia) > > Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal > rights over special entitlements. its a complex problem with the new distribution channels, unregulated, Google, FB, Tweeter, etc, where the little guys can put out content. Google, FB, Tweeter can each choose the 'truth', but they should be open channels, Alex Jones was fun, until he got onto Sandy Hook. Then he got canned, like other anouncers on national networks. Alex Jones vs CNN vs Al Jazeera, Our news organizations had to change their business models to survive and take money from the guys that generate the news content, Dems pay CNN, Repugs pay Fox... Well I know for a fact USA lives in a tight information bubble constrained by USA, that excludes most of the rest of the world. Can't fix that. However, Another way to look at it is as if it was a large libarary, and you can checkout any books you want too, any content matter. even Mien Kaumpt. and the libarian gets to choose the subjects of your books.... Or let the reader figure it out. But now with online channels, FB, Google, etc, who decides what our kids read or get exposed to (if they are playing online games)?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <g0tc9rF2c7dU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #704423 |
On 9/24/18 3:05 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 9/24/2018 2:26 PM, Snit wrote: >> On 9/24/18 11:37 AM, Sergio wrote: >> ... >>>>>> I am against you playing victim. NOBODY has a right to break terms of >>>>>> service time and time again and get away with it. In the case of >>>>>> Twitter, he was apparently breaking the "abusive behavior" rules >>>>>> and was >>>>>> warned repeatedly. I am sure it was much the same with others. >>>>>> >>>>>> NOBODY has a right to abuse others. NOBODY. Does not matter what >>>>>> political side you are on. >>>>> >>>>> bullshit, what do you thing comedians do on stage ? >>>> >>>> Apple, Google, Twitter, or anyone else should be forced to enable such >>>> bigotry. The fact that others accept comedians who engage in such is not >>>> relevant (unless you can show Apple, Google, and Twitter doing so). >>> >>> who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? >>> Facebook?  They need to be regulated. >> >> They each decide what they carry. Now if they are doing so in a >> discriminatory way this can be problematic, but that does not seem to >> apply here. > > yes, it obviously does and is. > Congress has hauled them up to testify several times now, and the DOJ is > getting involved. > you should know this. By all means show where they are blocking content in a discriminatory way. >>>>> Why are colleges allowed to base admissions on the color of their >>>>> skin ? >>>>> Harvard, UTexas and others >>>> >>>> While I do not agree with affirmative action the point is to offer a >>>> BALANCE to known discrimination -- to try to equate it with the >>>> discrimination it is working to balance is a false equivalency. >>> >>> no, it is not. >>> those collages look at the color of your skin, if white or asian, you >>> are out, if black you are in. >>> >>> That is clear institutionalized bigotry. >> >> From a very naive and surface view I can see why you would think so. > > try not to be naive and shallow. As I am noting, I am not -- I see the deeper issues which explain why affirmative action (balancing AGAINST known biases) is not the same as promoting those known biases, even if on a simple surface view it might appear the same to some. Are you able to see why a balancing response is not the same as the thing being balanced? > If a college rejects you because of the *color of your skin*, that is > institutionalized bigotry. Again, if you ignore the elephant in the room of balancing against known bias vs. backing that known bias I can see where you would reach that conclusion. I, however, do not ignore that elephant in the room. >> Please note I talked about the balancing factor... it is not as if I >> ignored the deeper issues. > > 'balancing factor' is simply an excuse to continue institutionalized > Racism, to meet a numbers goal for statisticians. Apparently you do not see the difference between backing known bias and balancing against it. Fair enough. Not much I can do to help you. >> But, again, note I am against affirmative action. I can understand why >> it is done but I do not approve of it. > > I reject it, it is racism, pure and simple. When you look at it from a very simplistic view and ignore the balancing factor I can see why you would think so. Sure. >>>>>>> Similarly, are you in favour of >>>>>>> corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> doing business? >>>>>> >>>>>> They are not prohibiting him from doing business -- they are not >>>>>> obligated to enable him to cause harm. >>>>>> >>>>>> You see, Slimer, you have NO special entitlement to harm others -- nor >>>>>> does Alex Jones. >>>>>> >>>>> Jones is entertainment dude, not news, >>>> >>>> The news is entertainment these days... >>> >>> agree, only way they can get make a profit. >> >> With Google you are the product. Same with the news. > > Google is worse than we thought. note that a majority of web pages have > a line of java script back to Google. Google is worse than we think, > they update their database with our IP, time, date, what webpage, and > duration. Facebook has a lot out there, and Twitter has many too [I use > NoScript, and it shows the JS as it blocks it, no google JS is needed to > run the page] One of the things I am happy about with the new Safari is it helps to block SOME of that. But, sure, Google does a lot of evil things (as do the others, including Apple... though I would say Google is in a class of their own). >>>  but either way, NOBODY is >>>> obligated to enable his bigotry and hatred. >>> >>> CNN hatred of Trump ? >>> left's hatred of Trump 24/7 ? >> >> If you have examples I am open to them. And if Apple or Google or >> Twitter wanted to boot them FOR repeated bigoted attacks or the like I >> would have no issue with that. But, again, this does not seem to apply. >> >>> Hillary's hatred of Men ? >> >> He campaign *did* include some sexist messages and I strongly oppose >> those. If Twitter, Apple, Google and the like had warned her repeatedly >> to stop and if she refused, and if her attacks were as extreme as those >> of Alex Jones against blacks and Muslims and others then I would back >> them kicking her off. > > usa media has a lot more blatent bias than many countries, I think that > is because our media follows british media. (to capture reader interest) > but then other countries have only one sided media (Saudi Arabia) The US certainly has biases... they push what will sell and they push right wing ideas about the wealthy being somehow better morally and being poor being a moral weakness. They rarely show the harm done by big corporations (Google, Apple, MS, Disney, whomever). They do not focus on the big economic issue of income inequality and wealth redistribution to the very rich. I would love to see them move more toward the center and not be so far to the right. >> Remember: I am not picking left vs. right, to me this is about equal >> rights over special entitlements. > > its a complex problem with the new distribution channels, unregulated, > Google, FB, Tweeter, etc, where the little guys can put out content. > Google, FB, Tweeter can each choose the 'truth', but they should be open > channels, Alex Jones was fun, until he got onto Sandy Hook. Then he got > canned, like other anouncers on national networks. I am fine with not enabling his version of hatred and conspiracy theories... and with holding him accountable to the harm he does. But he should (and does) have a right to speech. > Alex Jones vs CNN vs Al Jazeera, > Our news organizations had to change their business models to survive > and take money from the guys that generate the news content, Dems pay > CNN, Repugs pay Fox... CNN is pretty bad... MSNBC is worse... FOX is still worse than either (by far). I am not defending the MSM as being good. > Well I know for a fact USA lives in a tight information bubble > constrained by USA, that excludes most of the rest of the world. Can't > fix that. Ironically, one way to help get around that is to use services like Google (or Apple) News. > However, Another way to look at it is as if it was a large libarary, and > you can checkout any books you want too, any content matter. even Mien > Kaumpt. > > and the libarian gets to choose the subjects of your books.... > > Or let the reader figure it out. > > But now with online channels, FB, Google, etc, who decides what our kids > read or get exposed to (if they are playing online games)? I am happy to not have my kids repeatedly exposed to "Whites Only" signs and the like. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <pobgbv$mhp$31@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #704387 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:37:54 -0500, Sergio wrote: > who decides content and what is carried? Apple? Google? Tweeter? > Facebook? They need to be regulated. Hello, Sergio, we're here from the Party. We're going to need to see your Republican membership card. <snip, snip, snip, confetti> We can't allow you to keep that. Not after you suggested ... <sotto voce> regulating big businesses </sotto voce> ... that sort of heresy simply cannot be tolerated. You are hereby excommunicated for the cardinal sin of using the "R" word without preceding it with "de-" or a word like "dismantling". Now get the fuck out of our sight, apostate! -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <bk86e5.c42.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #704400 |
. vetoed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <Ed-dnVIkavmNmzTGnZ2dnUU7-I_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #704330 |
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:35:17 GMT, LO AND BEHOLD; "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <9S4qD.118460$lM2.103829@fx39.iad>: >On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:18:12 -0500, chrisv wrote: > >>benj wrote: >>>chrisv wrote: >>>>Skeeter wrote: >>>>>kkensington01 >>>>>>Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are >>>>>>called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working >>>>>>poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >>>>>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. >>>>Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. >>>Let me guess: You think communism really can work if only YOU are put in >>>charge of it this time? >>YA stupid right-winger. >>>I think that's called insane. >>Having fun knocking-down that straw man, right-winger? > >As you attack people from the right, I must ask you: are you in favour >of corporations such as Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter censoring >the views of conservative individuals? Similarly, are you in favour of >corporations such as PayPal prohibiting people such as Alex Jones from >doing business? they censor all sorts of stuff from all sorts of political stances. that most of the problems are potential legally-actionable threats of violence and racist foamy terroristic nonsense from conservatives seems to be a problem that you should take up with your conservative allies, and not with private corporations. private corporations aren't the government and aren't held to the constitution for their internal protocols. they can censor anything they please on their platform - especially if they might be sued for hosting or enabling hate speech and threats from degenerate low-lifes. alex jones is free to start his own corporation for disseminating his hate. (which obviously he already has) -- THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <po491i$d3v$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #703855 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 13:15:33 -0500, chrisv wrote: > Skeeter wrote: > >> kkensington01 >>> >>> >>> > And yet no conservative-controlled city in the world is a sanctuary >>> > for criminals... >>> >>> Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for >>> are called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the >>> working poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. >> >>And kensi spins it completely out of control....again. > > Let me guess: You're a stupid right-winger. DING DING DING! Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner ... -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36160253e9b0255b994c69@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #703837 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <po34in$2si$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > > On 9/21/2018 11:53 AM, SilverSlimer wrote: > > And yet no conservative-controlled city in the world is a sanctuary for > > criminals... > > Sure they are. It's just that the criminals they're sanctuaries for are > called "pillars of the community", live on Nob Hill, and rob the working > poor and rifle through little old ladies' pension funds. > > To conservatives, *that* you are a criminal isn't the important thing. > It's *how* you commit your crimes, and who your victims are. If you > steal from a corporate chain store's cash register with a gun, or rape > some rich old lady in some alley at knife point, they want you in jail. > If you rob non-wealthy people with a pen while wearing a three-piece > suit and rape your female employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex > and maybe spiking their drinks, you're a "good old boy" and get invited > to be their golfing buddy at the country club. Doncha just HATE men? -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700 |
| Subject | I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.27--3.56am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #704818 |
> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex > > Doncha just HATE men? I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <OL6rD.272428$cw.831@fx39.am4> |
| In reply to | #704842 |
On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex >> >> Doncha just HATE men? > > I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best daddy in the world` ;) > > The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected > in its birth rate -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, > at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. > Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be replaced with nation that has more then that.. -- press any key to continue or any other to quit...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <P67rD.65536$9O2.8023@fx03.iad> |
| In reply to | #704864 |
On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: > On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex >>> >>> Doncha just HATE men? >> >> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. > > I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best > daddy in the world` ;) > > >> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate >> -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, >> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. >> Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG > At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be > replaced with nation that has more then that.. Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe soon if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given too much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself as well as any motivation one might have to fix it. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Catholic
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. |
| Message-ID | <818rD.249198$Wx.215079@fx37.am4> |
| In reply to | #704871 |
On 2018-09-27, SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> wrote: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 15:34:06 +0000, Melzzzzz wrote: > >> On 2018-09-27, Jeff-Relf.Me @. <Jeff-Relf.Me@> wrote: >>>> > rape your employees by pressuring them into unwanted sex >>>> >>>> Doncha just HATE men? >>> >>> I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. >> >> I have letter from my daughter on working desk ;p She says `you are best >> daddy in the world` ;) >> >> >>> The wealth and intelligence of a nation is reflected in its birth rate >>> -- from Singapore (.83/woman) and Macau, >>> at the top, to Niger (6.49/woman) and Angola at the bottom. >>> Jeff-Relf.Me/Global.Fertility.Rates.1970.2014.PNG >> At birth rate less then 2/woman nation will dissapear eventually and be >> replaced with nation that has more then that.. > > Yep, low IQ "people" from the African continent will populate Europe soon > if today's youth doesn't wake up and realize that women were given too > much power and influence and consequently destroyed society itself as > well as any motivation one might have to fix it. That's true. Woman on west now does not think in terms of children and family, rather how to drive career. Popularisation of LGBT does not helps the matter.. > > > -- press any key to continue or any other to quit...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web