Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #703635 > unrolled thread

Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class

Started bykensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
First post2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Last post2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
Articles 20 on this page of 1000+ — 45 participants
Thread has 1097 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view

Thread has 1097 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.


Contents

  Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
              Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
                                              Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
                                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
                                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
                                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
                                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
                                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
                                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
                                                          Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
                                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
                                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
                                                            Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
                                                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
                                Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
                                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
                                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
                                          Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
                                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
                                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
                              Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
                        Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
                      I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
                                  Re: โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
                                            Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
                                              Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-29 15:43 -0700
                                                Double-A, Nov 2008. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 17:06 -0700
                                                  Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:34 -0400
                                                  Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
                                                Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:54 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
                                              Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
                                                Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
                                                  Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
                                                    Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
                                                      Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
                                                        Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
                                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
                                                            Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                                                          Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
                          We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
                              "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
                                Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
                                  Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
                                    Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
                                        If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
                                          Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
                                          Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
                                              Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
                                            Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
                                          Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
                                            Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
                                              Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
                                                Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
                                      Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
                                        Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
                                        I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
                                              If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
                                                        Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
                                                          Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
                                                            Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
                                                              Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
                                                                Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
                                                                  Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
                                                                    Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
                                                  The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
                                                    Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
                                                Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
                                                        Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
                                                          Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
                                                              Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
                                                                    Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
                                                                      I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
                                                                        Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                        Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
                                                                          Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
                                                                              Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
                                                                                Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
                                                                                    Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
                                                                                    Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
                                                                          Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
                                                                                          I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
                                                                                              Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
                                                                                                  Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
                                                                                                        Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
                                                                                                                Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
                                                                          Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
                                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
                                                                      Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
                                                                        Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
                                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
                                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
                                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
                                                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
                                                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
                                                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
                                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
                                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
                                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
                                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
                                                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
                                                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
                                                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
                                                                                    Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
                                                                                              Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
                                                                                                Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
                                                                                            The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
                                                                                        Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
                                                                                Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
                                                                                    Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
                                                                                        Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
                                                                                            Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
                                                                                    Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
                                                                            Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
                                                                              Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
                                                                              Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
                                                                                Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
                                                                                Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
                                                                          If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
                                                                            Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
                                                                              If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
                                                                                  Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
                                                                                Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
                                                                                    Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
                                                                                      Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
                                                                                        Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
                                                                                Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
                                                                                  Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
                                                                                    Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
                                                                                    China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
                                                                                      Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
                                                                                              Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
                                                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
                                                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
                                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
                                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
                                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
                                                                                          Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
                                                                                            Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
                                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
                                                                    Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
                                                                      Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
                                                                Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
                                                                Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
                                                                  Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
                                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
                                                                      Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
                                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
                                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
                                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
                                                            Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
                                                              Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
                                                Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
                                                  Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
                                                    Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
                                  More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
                            Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
                              Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
                  Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
                      Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
                        The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
                          Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
                            "IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
                              Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
                                Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
                                  Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
                                    Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
                            Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
                              Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
                    Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
                      The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
              Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
                Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
                  Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
                    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
                      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
                        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
                          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
                            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
          No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
          Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
            Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus  Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
        Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
          Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
            It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
              Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
                A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
                  Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
                Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:15 -0700
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
        Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
    Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
      Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
        The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
          Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
            You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
              Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
                Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
                  Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
                    Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
                      Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
                        The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
                                    Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
                                      Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
                                        Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
                                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
                                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
                                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
                                Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
                                  Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
                          2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
                          Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
                            Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
                              Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
                              What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
                                Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
                                  Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
                                    I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
                                      Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
                                        Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
                                          Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
                                        The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
                                          Re: The LessBad option. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-24 15:34 -0700
                                          Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
                                            "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
                                                I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
                                                    Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
                                                      Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
                                                        I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
                                                          Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
                                                          Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
                                                    You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
                                                      Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
                                                        Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
                                                          Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
                                                        Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
                                                          Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
                                                      Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
                                                          The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
                                                            Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
                                                              Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
                                                                Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
                                                                  Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
                                                                    Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
                                                              Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
                                                                              Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
                                                                                Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
                                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
                                                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
                                                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
                                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
                                                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
                                                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
                                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
                                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
                                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
                                                                            Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
                                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
                                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
                                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
                                                                      Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT!  โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„  Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐Ÿถ็ฌ› <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
                                                                        Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
                                                                          Re: ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโฐ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! โฐ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซ๐Ÿ”ซโ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ I walk everywhere. โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„โ„ Snowflake โ„ % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
                                                                          Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
                                                                            Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
                                                                Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
                                                                    Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
                                                                      Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
                                                                        Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
                                                                          Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
                                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
                                                              Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
                                                  Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
                                              Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
                                                "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
                                                Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
                                                    Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
                                                      Re: Steve Petruzzellis  (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
                                                              Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                                Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:33 -0700
                                                              An IQ of 185. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-10-02 06:41 -0700
                                                        Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
                                                          Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
                                                            Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
                                                  Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
                                                    Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
                                                      Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
                                                          Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
                                                        Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
                                                          Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700

Page 38 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 36 37 [38] 39 40 … 50  Next page →


#703739 — No one wants to pay.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
SubjectNo one wants to pay.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.20--7.35pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#703732
> San Fransisco, Nancy Pelosie' homeland, is
> packed full of homeless drugies on heroin, just like Sweeden.
> 
> "Neighborhood Violence is So Bad, Haight Residents
> Afraid To Go Outside", CBS San Francisco, Feb 2018 
> YouTube.COM/watch?v=APZgOyYMk_E

The police know the offenders, but won't jail them.
No one wants to pay, apparently.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703742

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
Message-ID<po1m6v$1iqo$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703732
On 9/20/2018 10:06 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 9/20/2018 8:44 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 9/20/2018 5:30 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2018 9:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> The contemporary decline of the Westโ€™s middle class may end up
>>>> advancing, indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has
>>>> carried forward since the seventeenth century:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> never forget the utlimate goal of the marxist hard-left like "kensi" is
>>> to "smash" the middle class (formerly called bourgeoisie which actually
>>> meant all small business including shops, merchants, etc.) The idea is
>>> to create just two classes: A "worker" slave class and "party member"
>>> ruling class. Nothing in between. Of course it has been the rise of the
>>> middle class in former Commie countries like the shithole that was
>>> communist China that has done more than anything to lift the ENTIRE
>>> WORLD out of the poverty known since the beginning of time!
>>>
>>> The left theories are PROVEN FAILURES on ALL LEVELS, economic, social,
>>> military, governmental. These ideas are TOTALLY discredited in the
>>> modern world. This shows you just how INSANE the loud mouth left like
>>> Nads, "Kensi" and their comrades really are. They need to have their
>>> bullhorns taken from them.
>>
>> quite true,
>>
>> Venezuela, floods of people walking out of the country because there is
>> no food,  Cuba, rotting hell hole,
>>
>>
>>   Sweden found itself struggling with crime, drug addiction, welfare
>> dependency, and a plague of red tape. Successful Swedes โ€” most famously,
>> Ingmar Bergman โ€” were fleeing the country to avoid its killing taxes.
>> โ€œGrowing numbers are plagued by a persistent, gnawing question: Is their
>> Utopia going sour?โ€
>>
>> Swedenโ€™s world-beating growth rate dried up. In 1975, it had been the
>> fourth-wealthiest nation on earth (as measured by GDP per capita); by
>> 1993, it had dropped to 14th. By then, Swedes had begun to regard their
>> experiment with socialism as, in Sanandajiโ€™s phrase, โ€œa colossal failure.โ€
>>
>> Denmark has come to a similar conclusion. Its lavish subsidies are being
>> rolled back amid sharp concerns about welfare abuse and an eroding work
>> ethic. In the last general election, Danes replaced a left-leaning
>> government with one tilted to the right. Loving Denmark doesnโ€™t mean
>> loving big-government welfarism.
>>
> 
> 
> and San Fransisco, Nancy Pelosie' homeland, packed full of homeless
> drugies on heroin, just like Sweeden.
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APZgOyYMk_E
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWF9fStAToI
> 
Pelosi Utopia may soon be coming to YOUR city after the coming Democrat 
"landslide".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=ld6qYJe4pRs

I'm pretty sure Utopia is just around the corner though once SF realizes 
it can hire "workers" to shovel Poo off the streets and pickup the free 
used needles they hand out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703747

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
Message-ID<po1nt9$1kun$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703742
On 9/20/2018 9:49 PM, benj wrote:
> On 9/20/2018 10:06 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 9/20/2018 8:44 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2018 5:30 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 9/20/2018 9:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> The contemporary decline of the Westโ€™s middle class may end up
>>>>> advancing, indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has
>>>>> carried forward since the seventeenth century:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> never forget the utlimate goal of the marxist hard-left like "kensi" is
>>>> to "smash" the middle class (formerly called bourgeoisie which actually
>>>> meant all small business including shops, merchants, etc.) The idea is
>>>> to create just two classes: A "worker" slave class and "party member"
>>>> ruling class. Nothing in between. Of course it has been the rise of the
>>>> middle class in former Commie countries like the shithole that was
>>>> communist China that has done more than anything to lift the ENTIRE
>>>> WORLD out of the poverty known since the beginning of time!
>>>>
>>>> The left theories are PROVEN FAILURES on ALL LEVELS, economic, social,
>>>> military, governmental. These ideas are TOTALLY discredited in the
>>>> modern world. This shows you just how INSANE the loud mouth left like
>>>> Nads, "Kensi" and their comrades really are. They need to have their
>>>> bullhorns taken from them.
>>>
>>> quite true,
>>>
>>> Venezuela, floods of people walking out of the country because there is
>>> no food,ย  Cuba, rotting hell hole,
>>>
>>>
>>> ย  Sweden found itself struggling with crime, drug addiction, welfare
>>> dependency, and a plague of red tape. Successful Swedes โ€” most famously,
>>> Ingmar Bergman โ€” were fleeing the country to avoid its killing taxes.
>>> โ€œGrowing numbers are plagued by a persistent, gnawing question: Is their
>>> Utopia going sour?โ€
>>>
>>> Swedenโ€™s world-beating growth rate dried up. In 1975, it had been the
>>> fourth-wealthiest nation on earth (as measured by GDP per capita); by
>>> 1993, it had dropped to 14th. By then, Swedes had begun to regard their
>>> experiment with socialism as, in Sanandajiโ€™s phrase, โ€œa colossal
>>> failure.โ€
>>>
>>> Denmark has come to a similar conclusion. Its lavish subsidies are being
>>> rolled back amid sharp concerns about welfare abuse and an eroding work
>>> ethic. In the last general election, Danes replaced a left-leaning
>>> government with one tilted to the right. Loving Denmark doesnโ€™t mean
>>> loving big-government welfarism.
>>>
>>
>>
>> and San Fransisco, Nancy Pelosie' homeland, packed full of homeless
>> drugies on heroin, just like Sweeden.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APZgOyYMk_E
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWF9fStAToI
>>
> Pelosi Utopia may soon be coming to YOUR city after the coming Democrat
> "landslide".
> 
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=ld6qYJe4pRs
> 
> I'm pretty sure Utopia is just around the corner though once SF realizes
> it can hire "workers" to shovel Poo off the streets and pickup the free
> used needles they hand out.

Future Pelosi Land, the "workers"  will help inject your heroin on the
street, so you don't even have to think or move.

Seriously - Democrats are legalizing pot, the gateway drug in
highschool,  so the future population is too stoned to think clearly,
and keep the Democrats in power.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703770

FromJust Wondering <JW@me.com>
Date2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
Message-ID<7v1pD.137826$tK2.62869@fx42.iad>
In reply to#703732
On 9/20/2018 8:06 PM, Sergio wrote:
> On 9/20/2018 8:44 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 9/20/2018 5:30 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2018 9:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>> The contemporary decline of the Westโ€™s middle class may end up
>>>> advancing, indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has
>>>> carried forward since the seventeenth century:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> never forget the utlimate goal of the marxist hard-left like "kensi" is
>>> to "smash" the middle class (formerly called bourgeoisie which actually
>>> meant all small business including shops, merchants, etc.) The idea is
>>> to create just two classes: A "worker" slave class and "party member"
>>> ruling class. Nothing in between. Of course it has been the rise of the
>>> middle class in former Commie countries like the shithole that was
>>> communist China that has done more than anything to lift the ENTIRE
>>> WORLD out of the poverty known since the beginning of time!
>>>
>>> The left theories are PROVEN FAILURES on ALL LEVELS, economic, social,
>>> military, governmental. These ideas are TOTALLY discredited in the
>>> modern world. This shows you just how INSANE the loud mouth left like
>>> Nads, "Kensi" and their comrades really are. They need to have their
>>> bullhorns taken from them.
>>
>> quite true,
>>
>> Venezuela, floods of people walking out of the country because there is
>> no food,  Cuba, rotting hell hole,
>>
>>
>>   Sweden found itself struggling with crime, drug addiction, welfare
>> dependency, and a plague of red tape. Successful Swedes โ€” most famously,
>> Ingmar Bergman โ€” were fleeing the country to avoid its killing taxes.
>> โ€œGrowing numbers are plagued by a persistent, gnawing question: Is their
>> Utopia going sour?โ€
>>
>> Swedenโ€™s world-beating growth rate dried up. In 1975, it had been the
>> fourth-wealthiest nation on earth (as measured by GDP per capita); by
>> 1993, it had dropped to 14th. By then, Swedes had begun to regard their
>> experiment with socialism as, in Sanandajiโ€™s phrase, โ€œa colossal failure.โ€
>>
>> Denmark has come to a similar conclusion. Its lavish subsidies are being
>> rolled back amid sharp concerns about welfare abuse and an eroding work
>> ethic. In the last general election, Danes replaced a left-leaning
>> government with one tilted to the right. Loving Denmark doesnโ€™t mean
>> loving big-government welfarism.
> 
> and San Fransisco, Nancy Pelosie' homeland, packed full of homeless
> drugies on heroin, just like Sweeden.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APZgOyYMk_E
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWF9fStAToI

I've read that, unlike Switzerland, the roads of San Francisco
are now pave with shit - in particular, SF's homeless druggies
are leaving their raw feces all over the great SF outdoors.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703794

FromKlaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net>
Date2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
Message-ID<5sh9qd9aidgbscrab4ru1h6rpuigkkfok2@4ax.com>
In reply to#703770
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 01:56:53 -0600, Just Wondering <JW@me.com> wrote:

>On 9/20/2018 8:06 PM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 9/20/2018 8:44 PM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 9/20/2018 5:30 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 9/20/2018 9:26 AM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> The contemporary decline of the Westโ€™s middle class may end up
>>>>> advancing, indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has
>>>>> carried forward since the seventeenth century:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> never forget the utlimate goal of the marxist hard-left like "kensi" is
>>>> to "smash" the middle class (formerly called bourgeoisie which actually
>>>> meant all small business including shops, merchants, etc.) The idea is
>>>> to create just two classes: A "worker" slave class and "party member"
>>>> ruling class. Nothing in between. Of course it has been the rise of the
>>>> middle class in former Commie countries like the shithole that was
>>>> communist China that has done more than anything to lift the ENTIRE
>>>> WORLD out of the poverty known since the beginning of time!
>>>>
>>>> The left theories are PROVEN FAILURES on ALL LEVELS, economic, social,
>>>> military, governmental. These ideas are TOTALLY discredited in the
>>>> modern world. This shows you just how INSANE the loud mouth left like
>>>> Nads, "Kensi" and their comrades really are. They need to have their
>>>> bullhorns taken from them.
>>>
>>> quite true,
>>>
>>> Venezuela, floods of people walking out of the country because there is
>>> no food,  Cuba, rotting hell hole,
>>>
>>>
>>>   Sweden found itself struggling with crime, drug addiction, welfare
>>> dependency, and a plague of red tape. Successful Swedes โ€” most famously,
>>> Ingmar Bergman โ€” were fleeing the country to avoid its killing taxes.
>>> โ€œGrowing numbers are plagued by a persistent, gnawing question: Is their
>>> Utopia going sour?โ€
>>>
>>> Swedenโ€™s world-beating growth rate dried up. In 1975, it had been the
>>> fourth-wealthiest nation on earth (as measured by GDP per capita); by
>>> 1993, it had dropped to 14th. By then, Swedes had begun to regard their
>>> experiment with socialism as, in Sanandajiโ€™s phrase, โ€œa colossal failure.โ€
>>>
>>> Denmark has come to a similar conclusion. Its lavish subsidies are being
>>> rolled back amid sharp concerns about welfare abuse and an eroding work
>>> ethic. In the last general election, Danes replaced a left-leaning
>>> government with one tilted to the right. Loving Denmark doesnโ€™t mean
>>> loving big-government welfarism.
>> 
>> and San Fransisco, Nancy Pelosie' homeland, packed full of homeless
>> drugies on heroin, just like Sweeden.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APZgOyYMk_E
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWF9fStAToI
>
>I've read that, unlike Switzerland, the roads of San Francisco
>are now pave with shit - in particular, SF's homeless druggies
>are leaving their raw feces all over the great SF outdoors.


They're voting to tax "Big Business" (leaving out "government," of
course) to build homeless shelters. After all, it's their fault.  :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703734 — Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
SubjectProgressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.20--7.14pm.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#703730
"kensi" [sic] and Nadegda are WideEyed Marxists.

To get there, they need us to believe the world is ending soon.

Progressive, Marxist, collectivist, Jim Jones has some KoolAid for them,
provided they surrender all of their worldly goods and
help him and steal from the fat, greedy bastards.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703803 — Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
SubjectRe: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones.
Message-ID<po2ofj$17uv$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703734
On 9/20/2018 10:14 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" [sic]

???

The fuck's that supposed to mean, kOoky?

> To get there, they need us to believe the world is ending soon.

Take one freaking look around! Climate change! Fascism marching like 
it's the late 1920s all over again! Economic turmoil! Extinctions! 
Insect die-off! It will take a bloody miracle for there not to be some 
huge disaster in the next 30-odd years!

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703819 — It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
SubjectIt's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.21--6.40am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#703803
> > "kensi" [sic]
> 
> ???  The fuck's that supposed to mean, kOoky?

In America, we capitalize proper names.

> > "kensi" [sic] and Nadegda are WideEyed Marxists.
> > To get there, they need us to believe the world is ending soon.
> 
> Climate change! 

4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten.
33 million years ago, the poles were tropical, not icy.

UnLike you, scientists show _ all sides of an argument;
-- pro and con, good and bad; usedcar salesman show _ only one side.

Jim Jones's KoolAid promised an end of "the world", people loved it.
Like you, he was a progressive, Marxist, and collectivist.

> Fascism marching like it's the late 1920s all over again! 

Fascism ( fasc(io), bundle ) is collectivism,
meant to suppress the individual, in the face of "a dying world".

> Economic turmoil! 

It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?

> Extinctions! 

Not everything is fit for life.
BlueBlooded horseshoe crabs have been around 450 million years.
33 million years ago, the poles were tropical, not icy.

> Insect die-off! 

Mosquitoes kill more humans than human murderers do.

> It will take a bloody miracle for there not to be some 
> huge disaster in the next 30-odd years!

You don't have any answers, I'm sure.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703825 — Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
SubjectRe: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?
Message-ID<po31k6$1sdf$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703819
On 9/21/2018 9:40 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> "kensi" [sic]
>>
>> ???  The fuck's that supposed to mean, kOoky?
> 
> In America, we capitalize proper names.

You've never heard of e. e. cummings? Or bell hooks?

> <repetitive droolings deleted>

OK, that's enough out of you for the rest of September, k0Oky. Back in 
the sin bin you go.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703833 — Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
SubjectRe: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?
Message-ID<po33lm$1vem$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703825
On 9/21/2018 11:10 AM, kensi wrote:
> On 9/21/2018 9:40 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> "kensi" [sic]
>>>
>>> ???ย  The fuck's that supposed to mean, kOoky?
>>
>> In America, we capitalize proper names.
> 
> You've never heard of e. e. cummings? Or bell hooks?
> 
>> <repetitive droolings deleted>
> 
> OK, that's enough out of you for the rest of September, k0Oky. Back in 
> the sin bin you go.
> 
Leave poor Rolf alone, you mental nutjob. Rolf may be a fellow kook 
traveler with you but he is not nearly as insane as you are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703841 — A good answer ?!

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
SubjectA good answer ?!
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.21--9.18am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#703825
> > > Climate change! 
> > 
> > 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten.
> > 33 million years ago, the poles were tropical, not icy.
> > 
> > UnLike you, scientists show _ all sides of an argument;
> > -- pro and con, good and bad; usedcar salesman show _ only one side.
> > 
> > Jim Jones's KoolAid promised an end of "the world", people loved it.
> > Like you, he was progressive, Marxist, and collectivist.
> 
> OK, that's enough out of you for the rest of September, k0Oky. 
> Back in the sin bin you go.

You think that's a good answer ?!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703932 — Re: A good answer ?!

Frombenj <benj.fake@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
SubjectRe: A good answer ?!
Message-ID<po3n5g$12dl$3@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703841
On 9/21/2018 12:18 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> Climate change!
>>>
>>> 4.5 billion years ago, the surface of earth was molten.
>>> 33 million years ago, the poles were tropical, not icy.
>>>
>>> UnLike you, scientists show _ all sides of an argument;
>>> -- pro and con, good and bad; usedcar salesman show _ only one side.
>>>
>>> Jim Jones's KoolAid promised an end of "the world", people loved it.
>>> Like you, he was progressive, Marxist, and collectivist.
>>
>> OK, that's enough out of you for the rest of September, k0Oky.
>> Back in the sin bin you go.
> 
> You think that's a good answer ?!
> 
A good answer for middle school!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703844 — Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?

FromSkeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
SubjectRe: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ?
Message-ID<MPG.360ecb7c1658e5319899fa@reader.albasani.net>
In reply to#703825
In article <po31k6$1sdf$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
> On 9/21/2018 9:40 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> >>> "kensi" [sic]
> >>
> >> ???  The fuck's that supposed to mean, kOoky?
> > 
> > In America, we capitalize proper names.
> 
> You've never heard of e. e. cummings? Or bell hooks?
> 
> > <repetitive droolings deleted>
> 
> OK, that's enough out of you for the rest of September, k0Oky. Back in 
> the sin bin you go.

Kensi spanked again.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703752

FromArindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-20 21:15 -0700
Message-ID<0e5ee303-5b06-450a-8821-bf5be1da0e03@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#703699
My recent trip to Russia was eye-opening. Stalin did wonders for workers who behaved properly and as for those who did not they were sent to slave labour camps where they were worked to death. So everyone worked hard and so the economy boomed. When they started getting soft after Stalin they collapsed within a few decades.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703774

FromCheckmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
Message-ID<MPG.360e4754f5c0700f994b14@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#703635
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <po0774$167f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
@gmail.nospam.invalid says...


> 
> The contemporary decline of the West?s middle class may end up 
> advancing, indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has carried 
> forward since the seventeenth century:
> 
> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/

Are you a card-carrying DSA member?

-- 
Checkmate ยฎ 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright ยฉ 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703805

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
Message-ID<po2ojt$17uv$5@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703774
On 9/21/2018 4:10 AM, Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!  In article <po0774$167f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
> 
>> The contemporary decline of the West?s middle class may end up
>> advancing, indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has carried
>> forward since the seventeenth century:
>>
>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/
> 
> Are you a card-carrying DSA member?

Everyone smart is.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#704043

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
Message-ID<po4l7f$79j$24@dont-email.me>
In reply to#703805

"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:po2ojt$17uv$5@gioia.aioe.org...
> On 9/21/2018 4:10 AM, Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!  In article <po0774$167f$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01
>> @gmail.nospam.invalid says...
>>
>>> The contemporary decline of the West?s middle class may end up
>>> advancing, indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has carried
>>> forward since the seventeenth century:
>>>
>>> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/
>>
>> Are you a card-carrying DSA member?
>
> Everyone smart is.

So that would be a 'no'.
 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703789

From"Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net>
Date2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
Message-ID<po29tv$b89$37@dont-email.me>
In reply to#703635

"kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote in message 
news:po0774$167f$1@gioia.aioe.org...
> The contemporary decline of the Westโ€™s middle class may end up advancing, 
> indirectly, the banner of humanity that the Left has carried forward since 
> the seventeenth century:
>
> https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/09/19/three-cheers-for-the-decline-of-the-middle-class/

17th Century....isn't that when the middle class was formed and broke the 
system of nobility and peasant?

I can see why the Democrats would love to return to an existence where they 
can only again become Feudal lords with total power over those they rule.
 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703804

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>
Date2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
Message-ID<po2oj3$17uv$4@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#703789
On 9/21/2018 3:18 AM, Scout wrote:
> 17th Century....isn't that when the middle class was formed and broke 
> the system of nobility and peasant?
> 
> I can see why the Democrats would love to return to an existence where 
> they can only again become Feudal lords with total power over those they 
> rule.

Projection. That's exactly that the right wants. Some, the "evangelical" 
religious right, long for the days before separation of church and 
state. Others, the "libertarians", for unfettered accumulation of wealth 
and the reduction of most of the population to debt peonage in service 
to the rich, thus a return to a world of aristocrats and peasants.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#703821 — The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps.

FromJeff-Relf.Me @.
Date2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
SubjectThe leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.21--7.07am.Seattle.2018>
In reply to#703804
"kensi" [sic] wrote:
> [ Libertarians want ] unfettered accumulation of wealth 
> and the reduction of most of the population to debt peonage, in service 
> of the rich, thus a return to a world of aristocrats and peasants.

Kensi's Fear mongering is designed to increase collectivism,
to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ).

Problem is, every time this has been tried,
the leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 38 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 36 37 [38] 39 40 … 50  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web