Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #703635 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 45 participants
Thread has 1097 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1097 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-20 09:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:30 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 20:44 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 18:45 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:26 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:42 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:30 -0400
Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:51 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 15:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 12:00 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:49 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 13:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-22 14:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-22 19:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 15:07 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:11 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 07:18 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 12:35 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 09:09 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:59 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-24 20:58 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 14:01 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 14:30 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-24 23:21 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 06:58 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:27 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 13:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:28 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 09:06 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:00 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:28 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 07:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:13 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 17:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 15:33 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 15:40 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 19:33 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:46 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:00 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:53 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:02 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:12 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:14 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-09-26 09:20 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:55 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 05:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 00:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:06 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 10:08 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 10:31 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:46 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 10:48 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 12:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 07:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 11:21 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:32 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 14:24 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:19 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 04:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:50 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:56 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:55 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:39 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 19:52 -0500
Inflation is immoral. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 02:52 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:33 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 13:12 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 08:17 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 17:49 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:44 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 13:51 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 13:59 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 22:36 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:23 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:15 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 07:38 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 20:22 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 07:15 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 23:00 +0100
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:10 -0500
Re: Today, the Democrats believe that people can commit crimes as long as they vote for them SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:21 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 10:05 -0600
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 15:23 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 08:14 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 12:57 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:04 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 07:57 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 10:52 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 09:43 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 13:37 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 12:26 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 12:34 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-24 17:05 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:19 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:43 -0500
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 02:22 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:54 -0700
I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 03:56 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 15:34 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 15:58 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:00 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-27 21:47 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:05 -0700
Re: â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-27 20:31 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 08:52 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 07:59 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:04 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:12 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:45 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:55 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:27 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:27 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:39 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:10 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:29 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Catalina" <Catalina@beach.sun> - 2018-09-30 02:39 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 01:25 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-28 02:02 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 06:47 -0500
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 18:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:31 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 18:56 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 18:57 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-09-28 20:30 +0100
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 12:37 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:51 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:40 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:08 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-29 14:23 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 10:52 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-29 18:55 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 12:41 -0700
Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 15:25 -0700
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-29 15:43 -0700
Double-A, Nov 2008. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 17:06 -0700
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:34 -0400
Re: Double-A, Nov 2008. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 19:27 +0000
Re: Being _ relatively poor isn't a real problem. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:54 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:29 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 21:48 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:16 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0600
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:18 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-29 12:43 -0400
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 17:33 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:17 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:08 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:26 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:36 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:42 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 22:13 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:33 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 12:50 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:18 +0000
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:22 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: I avoid women, children, and thieving junkies; not men per se. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 18:26 -0700
We need to eat more. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 09:38 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 +0000
"Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:09 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:10 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-09-27 17:19 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-27 12:58 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 13:16 -0500
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:04 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:06 -0700
If you're fucking, you're stupid. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 17:14 -0700
Re: If you're fucking, you're stupid. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 17:39 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 18:01 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 12:47 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:59 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:37 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-28 19:00 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:12 -0400
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:44 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:01 -0700
Artificial penises and testosterone implants. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 05:01 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:17 -0700
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 23:42 -0400
Re: Artificial penises and testosterone implants. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:56 -0700
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 16:26 +0000
Re: "Children" are everywhere, "adults" are hard to find. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:30 -0400
I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 09:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 12:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 19:09 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:04 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 21:47 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 21:52 +0000
If I were super attractive... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:04 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 18:08 -0400
Re: If I were super attractive... SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-28 22:08 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:10 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 15:52 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:55 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:00 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:05 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:15 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:22 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:24 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:28 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:31 -0700
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 23:37 +0000
The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-28 15:15 -0700
Re: The list of ancestors 1, 2, 3, or 4. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:18 +0000
Re: If I were super attractive... Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:09 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-28 17:29 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Brick <brick@mortar.invalid> - 2018-09-28 22:34 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:23 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:28 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:49 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:55 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-30 02:48 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:28 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:45 -0700
Was she looking for love ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-29 20:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:35 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:42 -0700
Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:22 -0700
I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 07:34 -0700
Re: I'd shut down the "party" so fast, your head would spin. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 20:37 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 22:25 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:40 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:15 -0700
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:08 +0000
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:19 -0600
Re: Were Dr. Ford the sweet, innocent, righteous woman you imagine... "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:26 -0700
Did Diogenes ever find his honest man ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:34 -0700
Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 10:01 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 15:00 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 16:01 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:09 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:30 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0500
I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 20:43 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-02 15:34 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:45 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 08:50 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 14:15 +0000
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 08:23 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-03 10:22 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:28 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:30 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:18 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-03 14:22 -0500
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:39 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 21:58 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:05 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:31 +0100
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm too Ugly to fuck (U), so it's LGBTQAXYZRNEHPU. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-04 20:55 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 12:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 15:52 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 16:02 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:04 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 23:08 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford will leave the country ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-10-01 21:15 -0700
Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 12:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:13 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-01 17:18 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 16:22 -0500
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:37 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 22:30 +0100
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:34 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:42 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 14:53 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:02 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:06 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:21 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:26 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:36 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:41 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:57 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:00 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 21:27 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-10-02 07:59 +0000
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:49 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:10 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:28 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:32 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:40 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:45 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:54 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:59 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:33 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:46 -0700
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:35 -0400
Re: Dr. Ford has made 700,000$, so far, with her GoFundMe account. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 15:03 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:13 -0400
Re: Dr Ford was just stupid, not immoral ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 07:33 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:29 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:59 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-09-30 17:52 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 13:11 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:25 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 23:22 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:25 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 14:35 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-03 13:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SWD <swd@whitehouse.gov> - 2018-10-03 18:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:19 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:38 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:50 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 13:59 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:27 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:51 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 09:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 06:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 11:37 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:52 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 12:08 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 09:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 19:26 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 14:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 16:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:08 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:18 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 13:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-03 15:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 06:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 17:36 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 10:53 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 19:10 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 12:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 20:51 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 15:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-04 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:55 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 10:08 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 02:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 12:48 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 09:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 14:19 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-05 07:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-10-05 10:36 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 10:43 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-10-05 17:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 22:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:16 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 19:21 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 17:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 20:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 15:41 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 17:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 19:27 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 12:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:04 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-05 14:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:04 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 18:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-04 21:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 22:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-04 06:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 08:45 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-04 13:05 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-04 02:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:53 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-04 05:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-04 13:41 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-04 07:56 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-05 03:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-05 03:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-05 06:58 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 16:24 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 17:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:47 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:14 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:32 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 15:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Checkmate" <ricksabian1@qmail.com> - 2018-10-03 18:39 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-03 14:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-03 17:12 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-03 18:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-30 17:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:53 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:12 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:55 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:21 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 11:26 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 16:05 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-30 23:07 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 18:19 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 19:22 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:43 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 20:42 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 13:57 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:05 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:20 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 11:51 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 15:13 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:15 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:20 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:34 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 21:49 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-30 14:00 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:13 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:27 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:38 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 22:44 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 23:00 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 15:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 02:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 12:56 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 05:46 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 13:58 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 06:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 17:11 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 10:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 18:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:44 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:03 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 11:07 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 14:12 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-01 13:56 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 19:07 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:47 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:49 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 22:59 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 00:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 07:42 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 16:52 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:32 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-02 09:59 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 14:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:10 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:09 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 07:57 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-10-01 01:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 10:14 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:01 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 02:50 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:12 +0000
Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:22 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:31 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:43 +0000
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:12 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:27 -0600
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:11 -0500
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:09 -0400
The Sex, Drugs, and Alcohol Party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 06:06 -0700
Re: Were Kavanaugh such an incel, he would've have been locked away, long ago. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:25 -0600
Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:14 -0700
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-10-01 08:50 -0500
Re: Nadegda is the only one who knows the true story, not the FBI. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:09 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:56 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 19:27 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:37 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:38 -0700
Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:02 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:06 -0700
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:14 +0000
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:31 -0700
Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:32 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:24 +0000
Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:37 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:47 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-10-01 11:15 -0500
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:00 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:26 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:53 -0700
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 18:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda got kidnapped, pushed into a room, at a high class party ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:16 -0700
Re: Why did this "incel bullshit" happen to Dr. Ford, and not Nadegda ?! SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:31 +0000
Re: Were you ever kidnapped anonymously ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 19:48 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-30 11:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 14:19 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:44 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 06:46 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 00:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:40 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:02 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 10:49 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:04 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 17:02 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:06 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:09 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:03 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:34 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:42 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:54 -0700
Greg, the incel. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 14:23 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:27 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-01 20:27 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 21:49 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 04:10 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:14 -0400
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:07 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700
Re: Greg, the incel. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000
If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000
Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400
Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000
Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:17 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 21:21 -0600
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:57 -0700
Trump is a salesman. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:37 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 22:06 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:44 +0000
Re: Trump is a salesman. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:29 -0400
Trump could sell accusations to a Dr. Ford. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 12:53 -0700
Re: Trump is a salesman. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-02 15:08 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:17 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:56 +0000
Take your kids and friends with you, please. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-01 21:45 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:30 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:35 -0400
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:16 -0700
China's Slave Trade. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 13:01 -0700
Re: China's Slave Trade. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:10 -0700
Re: Take your kids and friends with you, please. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:15 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:16 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-10-02 14:44 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-10-02 11:11 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 11:14 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-10-02 14:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:31 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:46 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:54 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:24 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 18:28 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:18 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 00:53 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 20:06 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-03 04:11 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-03 07:04 -0500
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:58 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 15:10 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 20:45 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-10-02 12:35 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 15:45 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:22 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:33 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 16:48 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 13:58 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 14:49 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-10-02 12:48 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-10-03 16:54 +0100
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 16:10 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 13:39 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:17 -0700
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:22 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-02 10:23 -0400
Re: Was she looking for love ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 22:01 +0000
Re: Was she looking for love ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:09 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 05:34 +0000
Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 06:25 -0700
Re: Dr Ford was equally "guilty" for going into a drunkard's bedroom. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 20:07 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-30 14:37 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-29 20:47 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:26 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:21 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 12:27 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 10:19 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-01 08:08 -0500
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-10-01 17:19 +0100
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 10:43 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-10-01 13:48 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:38 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 03:24 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 20:48 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-02 13:42 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 14:02 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Lunar Opticfibre <jfwaldby@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 15:18 -0600
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:36 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-10-02 06:46 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 19:18 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-29 19:41 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:44 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-29 19:55 -0400
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:58 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:21 +0000
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:27 -0700
Re: I'm not half as retarded as you need me to be, Andrzej. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 18:48 -0700
More children is always better ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 10:23 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:12 -0700
Re: We need to eat more. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:27 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:14 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-21 21:18 +0000
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:18 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:57 -0700
Re: The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 21:46 -0700
"IllGotten" gains. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 01:46 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0400
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 13:36 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:41 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-22 17:02 -0700
Re: "IllGotten" gains. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 17:11 -0700
Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 02:06 -0700
Re: Cigarettes kill old people, heroin kills the young. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 13:37 -0400
Re: Today, the conservative stance is to let criminals run free. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-21 16:14 -0700
The victims bear the cost, instead of the city. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 20:40 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-23 15:47 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-24 09:53 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:03 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:05 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 17:09 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:11 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:29 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-27 21:08 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-09-28 10:07 +0000
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 10:33 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:41 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-28 15:23 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-28 23:43 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 21:06 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 19:07 -0700
No one wants to pay. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:35 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 22:49 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-20 22:18 -0500
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2018-09-21 01:56 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2018-09-21 03:31 -0700
Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-20 19:14 -0700
Re: Progressive, Marxist, Collectivist, Jim Jones. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:33 -0400
It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 06:40 -0700
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 11:10 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:44 -0400
A good answer ?! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 09:18 -0700
Re: A good answer ?! benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:17 -0400
Re: It's getting harder to steal from "the rich" ( anyone with a pulse ) ? Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-21 10:34 -0600
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 21:15 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 01:10 -0700
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:36 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-22 01:31 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-09-21 03:18 -0400
Re: Three Cheers for the Decline of the Middle Class kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-21 08:35 -0400
The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 07:07 -0700
Re: The leaders fornicated the poor, in their death camps. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 03:46 +0000
You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-21 21:31 -0700
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-22 11:58 -0400
Re: You dream of robbing "the rich" but end up robbing me. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-09-22 16:55 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 11:33 -0700
Re: Libtard's thievery. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-22 19:08 +0000
Libtard's thievery. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 12:28 -0700
Relf's poverty. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 05:23 +0000
The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-22 23:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 02:38 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-23 10:31 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-23 16:06 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 12:10 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 12:46 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-23 10:44 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 09:15 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-23 18:32 +0100
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 10:37 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 11:37 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-24 12:04 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 13:29 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-23 16:47 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-25 22:43 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 00:01 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:49 -0500
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 11:05 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:24 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:23 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:51 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:38 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:20 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:55 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:02 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:33 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:53 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-24 09:16 -0500
2006-2008 were tough years for me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 00:20 -0700
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 21:29 +0000
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-23 17:55 -0400
Re: The Fed is about to invert the yield curve. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-23 22:29 +0000
What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-23 19:52 -0700
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 15:14 +0000
Re: What's your (taxed) job, hypocrite ? Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-24 10:32 -0500
I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 09:01 -0700
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-24 20:11 +0000
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-09-24 16:18 -0400
Re: I'm an apathetic, AltProgressive individualist. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-24 13:25 -0700
The LessBad option. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-24 15:17 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-09-24 15:34 -0700
Re: The LessBad option. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 01:43 +0000
"God" has punished Nadegda for this. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 02:47 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 08:05 -0500
I walk everywhere. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:16 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:23 -0400
Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:31 -0700
Re: Greg can't fathom how sober I am, and have been. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:49 -0400
I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:59 -0700
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:04 -0400
Re: Your theory is full of holes... Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 10:15 -0500
Re: I'm sensitive to light, like my mom; it's a Swiss thing. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:04 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:50 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-25 12:13 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 11:17 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:50 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-25 13:37 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 09:28 -0500
You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 07:41 -0700
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 10:50 -0400
Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 08:02 -0700
Re: Hare Krishna, Hare Rama, Hare Jesus. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 11:08 -0400
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:43 +0000
Re: You can be an atheist, yet love Hinduism. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:51 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 16:35 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:48 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 12:50 -0400
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-25 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:48 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-25 21:52 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:54 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:14 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 19:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 00:51 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 03:18 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:58 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 09:33 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-26 08:56 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:59 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-26 11:52 -0500
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 23:32 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:48 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:01 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 16:59 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 17:00 -0700
The GasPump lines. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 17:06 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 17:46 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-25 22:53 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-25 19:56 -0700
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:16 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-09-26 10:59 -0400
Re: The GasPump lines. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 11:12 -0400
Summer of 1979. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-26 02:45 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 21:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-25 19:35 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 09:47 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:06 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 18:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Sam O'Nella <poison@donteatit.net> - 2018-09-26 17:38 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:39 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-09-26 12:41 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 10:01 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 11:45 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:56 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:07 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 12:22 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:46 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:51 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:10 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:22 -0400
Kensi prefers science, and is biased. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-27 05:15 -0700
Re: Kensi prefers science, and is biased. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 19:43 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 09:11 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 02:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 14:04 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 07:12 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:25 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 12:36 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 17:52 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 11:08 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-09-27 19:45 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 14:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-27 19:19 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 12:38 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-27 23:46 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 15:53 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:06 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 10:20 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 13:25 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:21 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-28 13:00 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 16:13 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-28 11:11 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-27 19:13 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 11:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 03:48 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 18:23 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 11:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 14:24 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:21 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 23:15 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:20 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-28 20:16 +0100
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 12:31 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 09:20 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-09-28 06:52 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-28 10:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-27 09:55 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 12:32 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:10 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. kensi <kkensinqton01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:23 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 15:53 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 13:23 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 16:37 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 20:58 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:05 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:07 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:15 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda - 2018-09-26 14:21 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:27 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-09-26 15:49 -0600
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:30 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-09-27 09:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ðķįŽ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-09-26 15:21 -0500
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 14:31 -0700
Re: ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦ Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" ðŦðŦðŦâ° POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! â°ðŦðŦðŦâ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â I walk everywhere. â Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake ââ Snowflake â % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:33 -0700
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 17:41 -0400
Re: ???? POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ???? Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:42 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-09-26 09:14 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 16:26 -0400
Re: I walk everywhere. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-26 21:00 +0000
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 14:04 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-26 21:50 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 12:05 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-27 22:19 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:25 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-26 16:27 -0700
Re: I walk everywhere. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:54 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-25 20:38 +0000
"God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-25 13:51 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 13:53 -0700
Re: "God" is not, nor ever was, a sky pixie. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:12 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-25 17:23 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 14:28 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-25 18:17 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-26 07:06 -0500
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-26 11:48 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. John of Patmos <jpatmos1318@gmXil.com> - 2018-09-29 21:51 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 16:14 -0700
Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 19:16 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis (was: "God" has punished Nadegda for this.) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:26 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis snit <usnet@iminsane.net> - 2018-09-29 21:49 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:56 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:19 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-09-30 09:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 12:04 -0400
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-10-01 22:33 -0700
An IQ of 185. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-10-02 06:41 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 20:20 -0700
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:29 +0000
Re: Steve Petruzzellis Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:44 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 01:23 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-09-29 22:00 -0400
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:30 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-09-30 10:33 +0100
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 03:24 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-09-30 03:37 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-29 22:43 -0700
Willful ignorance. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-09-30 05:34 -0700
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-09-30 21:42 +0000
Re: "God" has punished Nadegda for this. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-09-30 14:47 -0700
Page 31 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 29 30 [31] 32 33 … 50 Next page →
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 21:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Greg, the incel. |
| Message-ID | <pp0pdl$1of$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705836 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:14:13 -0400, Stinky Gzrrglz Hell, Rapist wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 04:10:10 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:27:28 -0500, pandora wrote: >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:23:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>>> You (Greg) replied: >>>>> > If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want it. >>>>> >>>>> You should try force at least once. It's way more fun. >>>>> And, it's actually what most women crave. >>>> >>>> You should live in a remote cabin, far away from everyone; either >>>> that or jail. >>> >>> He's doing just that; living in a remote cabin far away from others. >> >>And our noses thank him daily for doing so. >> >>And SPNAK! on Gerzgglz, who k'lamed he'd "driven you off" a few of his >>posts ago. No surprise that he turned out to be wrong yet again, as he'd >>already used up his two allotted stopped-clock moments for today on a >>couple of trivial observations about the weather. >> >><snicker> > > WRONG! That was obviously a FAKE pandora Proof, kook? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 14:57 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Greg, the incel. |
| Message-ID | <bktf4t.pt2.19.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #705911 |
On 2018-10-02 2:53 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 10:14:13 -0400, Stinky Gzrrglz Hell, Rapist wrote: > >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 04:10:10 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:27:28 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:23:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> >>>>> You (Greg) replied: >>>>>>> If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want it. >>>>>> >>>>>> You should try force at least once. It's way more fun. >>>>>> And, it's actually what most women crave. >>>>> >>>>> You should live in a remote cabin, far away from everyone; either >>>>> that or jail. >>>> >>>> He's doing just that; living in a remote cabin far away from others. >>> >>> And our noses thank him daily for doing so. >>> >>> And SPNAK! on Gerzgglz, who k'lamed he'd "driven you off" a few of his >>> posts ago. No surprise that he turned out to be wrong yet again, as he'd >>> already used up his two allotted stopped-clock moments for today on a >>> couple of trivial observations about the weather. >>> >>> <snicker> >> >> WRONG! That was obviously a FAKE pandora > > Proof, kook? > you're such a fk head rerun when you start the proof kook shit , prove you're not licking your nuts right now , you can't so you are
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pandora <pandora@peak.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 15:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Greg, the incel. |
| Message-ID | <g8mdnW_rHoFASy7GnZ2dnUU7-dWdnZ2d@scnresearch.com> |
| In reply to | #705770 |
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:10:10 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:27:28 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:23:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >>> You (Greg) replied: >>>> > If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want it. >>>> >>>> You should try force at least once. It's way more fun. >>>> And, it's actually what most women crave. >>> >>> You should live in a remote cabin, far away from everyone; either that >>> or jail. >> >> He's doing just that; living in a remote cabin far away from others. > > And our noses thank him daily for doing so. > > And SPNAK! on Gerzgglz, who k'lamed he'd "driven you off" a few of his > posts ago. No surprise that he turned out to be wrong yet again, as he'd > already used up his two allotted stopped-clock moments for today on a > couple of trivial observations about the weather. > > <snicker> He frequently has delusions of grandeur.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 13:39 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Greg, the incel. |
| Message-ID | <bktaif.6l9.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #705895 |
On 2018-10-02 1:36 PM, pandora wrote: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:10:10 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:27:28 -0500, pandora wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:23:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> >>>> You (Greg) replied: >>>>>> If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want it. >>>>> >>>>> You should try force at least once. It's way more fun. >>>>> And, it's actually what most women crave. >>>> >>>> You should live in a remote cabin, far away from everyone; either that >>>> or jail. >>> >>> He's doing just that; living in a remote cabin far away from others. >> >> And our noses thank him daily for doing so. >> >> And SPNAK! on Gerzgglz, who k'lamed he'd "driven you off" a few of his >> posts ago. No surprise that he turned out to be wrong yet again, as he'd >> already used up his two allotted stopped-clock moments for today on a >> couple of trivial observations about the weather. >> >> <snicker> > > He frequently has delusions of grandeur. > he's not the only one that made that claim
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 17:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Greg, the incel. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361daad46ac51ebb994d5d@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #705896 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <bktaif.6l9.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... > > On 2018-10-02 1:36 PM, pandora wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:10:10 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > >> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:27:28 -0500, pandora wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:23:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>> > >>>> You (Greg) replied: > >>>>>> If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want it. > >>>>> > >>>>> You should try force at least once. It's way more fun. > >>>>> And, it's actually what most women crave. > >>>> > >>>> You should live in a remote cabin, far away from everyone; either that > >>>> or jail. > >>> > >>> He's doing just that; living in a remote cabin far away from others. > >> > >> And our noses thank him daily for doing so. > >> > >> And SPNAK! on Gerzgglz, who k'lamed he'd "driven you off" a few of his > >> posts ago. No surprise that he turned out to be wrong yet again, as he'd > >> already used up his two allotted stopped-clock moments for today on a > >> couple of trivial observations about the weather. > >> > >> <snicker> > > > > He frequently has delusions of grandeur. > > > he's not the only one that made that claim He's the only one that I saw make it. -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 17:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Greg, the incel. |
| Message-ID | <bkto4r.9bv.17.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #705934 |
On 2018-10-02 5:19 PM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <bktaif.6l9.19.1@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com > says... > > >> >> On 2018-10-02 1:36 PM, pandora wrote: >>> On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 04:10:10 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 20:27:28 -0500, pandora wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 14:23:11 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> You (Greg) replied: >>>>>>>> If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You should try force at least once. It's way more fun. >>>>>>> And, it's actually what most women crave. >>>>>> >>>>>> You should live in a remote cabin, far away from everyone; either that >>>>>> or jail. >>>>> >>>>> He's doing just that; living in a remote cabin far away from others. >>>> >>>> And our noses thank him daily for doing so. >>>> >>>> And SPNAK! on Gerzgglz, who k'lamed he'd "driven you off" a few of his >>>> posts ago. No surprise that he turned out to be wrong yet again, as he'd >>>> already used up his two allotted stopped-clock moments for today on a >>>> couple of trivial observations about the weather. >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> >>> He frequently has delusions of grandeur. >>> >> he's not the only one that made that claim > > He's the only one that I saw make it. > cause he isn't
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 02:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pos027$mhp$123@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705380 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 16:42:24 -0400, Stinky Grzeggl Hell, Rapist wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in my >>much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we were >>just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if I told >>her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because I didn't. >>She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and didn't >>try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, and tried >>to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking about me. >>If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she would have even >>remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption that anyone with a >>dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want >>it. > > You should try force at least once. It's way more fun. > And, it's actually what most women crave. Speaking from experience, are you, rapist? You disgust me. And it's not *just* the smell. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 13:49 -0700 |
| Subject | If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.30--1.49pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #705372 |
> we were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but > only if I told her I loved her first. > I told her I wouldn't say that because I didn't. If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her; otherwise, she'll suck you dry ( not in a fun way ), and move on to the next.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 02:17 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. |
| Message-ID | <pos041$mhp$124@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705384 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:49:33 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> we were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if >> I told her I loved her first. >> I told her I wouldn't say that because I didn't. > > If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her; > otherwise, she'll suck you dry ( not in a fun way ), > and move on to the next. Proof, misogynist kook? -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 19:41 -0700 |
| Subject | If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Sep.30--7.41pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #705472 |
> > If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her; > > otherwise, she'll suck you dry ( not in a fun way ), > > and move on to the next. > > Proof, misogynist kook? High Net Worth Women are a safer bet, that's all. P.S. your autism is showing, badly.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 04:26 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. |
| Message-ID | <pos7ko$mhp$130@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705479 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:41:30 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> > If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her; >> > otherwise, she'll suck you dry ( not in a fun way ), >> > and move on to the next. >> >> Proof, misogynist kook? > > High Net Worth Women are a safer bet, that's all. > > P.S. your autism is showing, badly. ... says the kook whose model of human social behavior is so simplistic it assumes 100% of all women are golddiggers. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 05:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Oct.1--5.54am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #705489 |
Nadegda replied: > > > > If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. > > > > > > misogynist kook > > > > Your autism is showing. > > ... says the kook whose model of human social behavior > is so simplistic it assumes 100% of all women are golddiggers. Let's consider "Chad" and "Stacy", the proverbial hot "couple". All day long, everyday, Stacy tells Chad: "No, you can't fuck me, you idiot". All day long, everyday, Chad tells Stacy: "No, I don't love you, you idiot". Chad loves his dog, takes care of it; Stacy sees that, and wants it. Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 11:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. |
| Message-ID | <potfm0$lts$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #705544 |
On 10/1/2018 8:54 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Nadegda replied: >>>>> If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. >>>> >>>> misogynist kook >>> >>> Your autism is showing. >> >> ... says the kook whose model of human social behavior >> is so simplistic it assumes 100% of all women are golddiggers. > > Let's consider "Chad" and "Stacy", the proverbial hot "couple". > > All day long, everyday, Stacy tells Chad: "No, you can't fuck me, you idiot". > > All day long, everyday, Chad tells Stacy: "No, I don't love you, you idiot". > > Chad loves his dog, takes care of it; Stacy sees that, and wants it. > Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. > Face the Truth, Rolf. All men are pigs and all women are whores!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-02 03:09 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Everything Stacy wants costs Chad money, and lots of it. |
| Message-ID | <pounhe$at2$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705544 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 05:54:28 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > Nadegda replied: >> > > > If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch >> > > > her. >> > > >> > > misogynist kook >> > >> > Your autism is showing. >> >> ... says the kook whose model of human social behavior is so simplistic >> it assumes 100% of all women are golddiggers. > > Let's consider "Chad" and "Stacy", [more incel bullshit deleted] [nothing left] -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 08:05 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: If a woman doesn't have a high net worth, you shouldn't touch her. |
| Message-ID | <1nvzfrf.18hhvy51n77opaN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #705479 |
<Jeff-Relf.Me> wrote: [of Nerdegda] > P.S. your autism is showing, badly. True, that. -- ^Ã^ My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 02:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705372 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article >> > <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >> >> wrote: >> >> >On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> >> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? >> >> >> Was she looking for love ? >> >> > >> >> >Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not >> >> >amount to giving consent. >> >> >> >> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including >> >> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a >> >> willingness to get wet. >> >> >> >> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have >> >> consequences. You would be wrong about that... >> > >> > Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a >> > drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life >> > trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to >> > make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, >> > amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps on >> > the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the room. >> > The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might expect. >> > Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That sounds >> > like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound like they >> > intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have wandered off to >> > find some other mischief to get into. IOW, >> > she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to consume >> > the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to accept ANY >> > responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. >> >> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. >> >> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for >> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have >> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite >> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, >> commit rape. > > I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in my > much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we were > just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if I told > her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because I didn't. > She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and didn't > try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, and tried > to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking about me. > If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she would have even > remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption that anyone with a > dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want > it. So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy Moore, and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-09-30 23:54 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361b6494c1c26e88994cfd@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #705470 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article > >> > <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, > >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> >On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> >> >> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? > >> >> >> Was she looking for love ? > >> >> > > >> >> >Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not > >> >> >amount to giving consent. > >> >> > >> >> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including > >> >> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a > >> >> willingness to get wet. > >> >> > >> >> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have > >> >> consequences. You would be wrong about that... > >> > > >> > Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a > >> > drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life > >> > trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to > >> > make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, > >> > amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps on > >> > the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the room. > >> > The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might expect. > >> > Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That sounds > >> > like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound like they > >> > intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have wandered off to > >> > find some other mischief to get into. IOW, > >> > she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to consume > >> > the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to accept ANY > >> > responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. > >> > >> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. > >> > >> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for > >> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have > >> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite > >> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, > >> commit rape. > > > > I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in my > > much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we were > > just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if I told > > her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because I didn't. > > She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and didn't > > try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, and tried > > to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking about me. > > If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she would have even > > remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption that anyone with a > > dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and willingly, I don't want > > it. > > So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even > remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the > rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy Moore, > and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? What is it about Kavanaugh that trips your trigger? It certainly isn't any evidence that's even remotely provable. Is it the fact that he's not a Democrat, like out former Commander-In- Briefs, William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the possibility that Kavanaugh might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and take control of whatever might be baking in your oven some day? -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 13:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <yppsD.31103$X82.27503@fx22.iad> |
| In reply to | #705502 |
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >> > by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> > @gmail.invalid says... >> > >> > >> > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >> >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article >> >> > <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, >> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> >> >> >> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? >> >> >> >> Was she looking for love ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> >Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not >> >> >> >amount to giving consent. >> >> >> >> >> >> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including >> >> >> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a >> >> >> willingness to get wet. >> >> >> >> >> >> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have >> >> >> consequences. You would be wrong about that... >> >> > >> >> > Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a >> >> > drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life >> >> > trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to >> >> > make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, >> >> > amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps >> >> > on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the >> >> > room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might >> >> > expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That >> >> > sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound >> >> > like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have >> >> > wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, >> >> > she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to >> >> > consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to >> >> > accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. >> >> >> >> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. >> >> >> >> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for >> >> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have >> >> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite >> >> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, >> >> commit rape. >> > >> > I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in >> > my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we >> > were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if >> > I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because >> > I didn't. >> > She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and >> > didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, >> > and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking >> > about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she >> > would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption >> > that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and >> > willingly, I don't want it. >> >> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even >> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the >> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy >> Moore, >> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P > > "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who > have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with > Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? What is it about Kavanaugh that > trips your trigger? It certainly isn't any evidence that's even > remotely provable. Is it the fact that he's not a Democrat, like out > former Commander-In- Briefs, William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the > possibility that Kavanaugh might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and > take control of whatever might be baking in your oven some day? Bill Clinton flat out raped women and the Democrats refused to hear it and Keith Allison beat the crap out of his wife and they once again don't care. Anyone who believes that Democrats actually care about female victims is a fool. They only care about gaining as much power as possible and they will gladly throw innocent people under the bus with rape, sexism or racism allegations to do it. Bill Clinton should be in jail, as should his wife and Keith Ellison. However, they're left-wing so they're going to be protected at all costs by their fellow leftist politicians, the media, the music industry, the movie industry and so on. To Hell with all of them. -- SilverSlimer FSF Contributor / EFF Member / Free speech advocate Absolute centrist, proud Christian
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 10:42 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <MPG.361bfc4b99f77475994d0a@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #705550 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <yppsD.31103$X82.27503@fx22.iad>, silver@slim.er says... > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > > > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> > >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts > >> > by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > >> > @gmail.invalid says... > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> >> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading > >> >> > posts by Checkmate! In article > >> >> > <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, > >> >> > greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> >On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >> >> >> >> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? > >> >> >> >> Was she looking for love ? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not > >> >> >> >amount to giving consent. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including > >> >> >> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a > >> >> >> willingness to get wet. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have > >> >> >> consequences. You would be wrong about that... > >> >> > > >> >> > Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a > >> >> > drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life > >> >> > trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to > >> >> > make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, > >> >> > amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps > >> >> > on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the > >> >> > room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might > >> >> > expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That > >> >> > sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound > >> >> > like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have > >> >> > wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, > >> >> > she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to > >> >> > consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to > >> >> > accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. > >> >> > >> >> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. > >> >> > >> >> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for > >> >> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have > >> >> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite > >> >> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, > >> >> commit rape. > >> > > >> > I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in > >> > my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we > >> > were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if > >> > I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because > >> > I didn't. > >> > She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and > >> > didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, > >> > and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking > >> > about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she > >> > would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption > >> > that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and > >> > willingly, I don't want it. > >> > >> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even > >> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the > >> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy > >> Moore, > >> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P > > > > "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who > > have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with > > Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? What is it about Kavanaugh that > > trips your trigger? It certainly isn't any evidence that's even > > remotely provable. Is it the fact that he's not a Democrat, like out > > former Commander-In- Briefs, William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the > > possibility that Kavanaugh might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and > > take control of whatever might be baking in your oven some day? > > Bill Clinton flat out raped women and the Democrats refused to hear it > and Keith Allison beat the crap out of his wife and they once again don't > care. Anyone who believes that Democrats actually care about female > victims is a fool. They only care about gaining as much power as possible > and they will gladly throw innocent people under the bus with rape, > sexism or racism allegations to do it. > > Bill Clinton should be in jail, as should his wife and Keith Ellison. > However, they're left-wing so they're going to be protected at all costs > by their fellow leftist politicians, the media, the music industry, the > movie industry and so on. To Hell with all of them. Precisely! Hypocrites, every one of 'em! -- Checkmate ÂŪ Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller Copyright ÂĐ 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-10-01 16:29 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Was she looking for love ? |
| Message-ID | <pouakc$v7j$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #705607 |
On 10/1/2018 10:42 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <yppsD.31103$X82.27503@fx22.iad>, silver@slim.er > says... > > >> >> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:54:50 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <pos00i$mhp$122@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:34:08 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <pora76$mhp$108@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:32:34 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <djq1rdt4na60fld5d79059fe0evo3n256v@4ax.com>, >>>>>>> greghall@yacht_maester.fake says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 05:35:12, Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018 20:55:02, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Why did Dr Ford go into a private bedroom with a drunk man ? >>>>>>>>>> Was she looking for love ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Irrelevant. Going into someone's bedroom with someone does not >>>>>>>>> amount to giving consent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong! It amounts to a willingness to be petted up to including >>>>>>>> sexual intercourse just like going into a shower amounts to a >>>>>>>> willingness to get wet. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You liberal feminists seem to think NONE of your actions have >>>>>>>> consequences. You would be wrong about that... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Little girl thought it was okay to attend and participate in a >>>>>>> drinking party at age 15, and spends the next 36 years of her life >>>>>>> trying to get over the trauma of another drunken boy attempting to >>>>>>> make sexual advances towards her... which, by her own account, >>>>>>> amounted to some inappropriate roughhousing. The second guy jumps >>>>>>> on the bed, they all fall onto the floor, and she runs out of the >>>>>>> room. The two boys laugh, and don't even pursue her like one might >>>>>>> expect. Instead, they laugh and "ping-pong" down the stairs. That >>>>>>> sounds like a bunch of teens behaving badly, but it doesn't sound >>>>>>> like they intended to forcibly rape her, or they wouldn't have >>>>>>> wandered off to find some other mischief to get into. IOW, >>>>>>> she didn't get raped, she got scared... and this is enough to >>>>>>> consume the next 36 years of her life? She's not even willing to >>>>>>> accept ANY responsibility for her own lack of good judgment. >>>>>> >>>>>> What a load of victim-blaming bullshit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tell me, kooky, are you saying that just out of partisan support for >>>>>> Trump and Kavanofuckingway? Or are you saying that because you have >>>>>> been pushy with reluctant women in the past yourself, and are quite >>>>>> averse to the thought that maybe you came close to, or actually did, >>>>>> commit rape. >>>>> >>>>> I've never forced myself on anyone, you paranoid Ko0k. In fact, in >>>>> my much younger years I was fooling around in bed with a girl, and we >>>>> were just about to do The Deed, when she said she would, but only if >>>>> I told her I loved her first. I told her I wouldn't say that because >>>>> I didn't. >>>>> She still slept with me that night, but I honored her wishes and >>>>> didn't try to pork her. A friend of mine ran into her years later, >>>>> and tried to hit on her. He told me all she could do was keep asking >>>>> about me. If I had lied to her just to get sex, I doubt that she >>>>> would have even remembered me. You seem to be under the assumption >>>>> that anyone with a dick is a rapist. If it isn't given freely and >>>>> willingly, I don't want it. >>>> >>>> So it's just partisan bullshit then. Gotcha. You won't do anything even >>>> remotely rapey yourself, but you will wholeheartedly support the >>>> rapepublican party and rapey assholes within it like Kavanaugh, Roy >>>> Moore, >>>> and of course the Tangerine Tyrant itself. :P >>> >>> "Partisan bullshit"? What about at least half a dozen Democrats who >>> have done far worse, much more recently (than what's ALLEGED with >>> Kavanaugh), and with much more proof? What is it about Kavanaugh that >>> trips your trigger? It certainly isn't any evidence that's even >>> remotely provable. Is it the fact that he's not a Democrat, like out >>> former Commander-In- Briefs, William Jefferson Clinton... or is it the >>> possibility that Kavanaugh might potentially overturn Roe V Wade and >>> take control of whatever might be baking in your oven some day? >> >> Bill Clinton flat out raped women and the Democrats refused to hear it >> and Keith Allison beat the crap out of his wife and they once again don't >> care. Anyone who believes that Democrats actually care about female >> victims is a fool. They only care about gaining as much power as possible >> and they will gladly throw innocent people under the bus with rape, >> sexism or racism allegations to do it. >> >> Bill Clinton should be in jail, as should his wife and Keith Ellison. >> However, they're left-wing so they're going to be protected at all costs >> by their fellow leftist politicians, the media, the music industry, the >> movie industry and so on. To Hell with all of them. > > Precisely! Hypocrites, every one of 'em! > Still looking forward into fantasy land where there is an actual serious investigation into Juanita and William...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 31 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 29 30 [31] 32 33 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web