Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #712831 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 44 participants
Thread has 1403 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1403 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
Fake News ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 01:53 -0800
Re: Fake News ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-15 09:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 13:46 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:03 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 19:10 +0000
Re: Fake News ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-15 14:13 -0500
Re: Fake News ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-11-15 20:36 +0000
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:21 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 14:29 -0500
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 18:57 -0800
Re: Fake News ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-15 17:02 -0700
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 20:38 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-15 12:34 -0800
Re: Fake News ? Sir Gaygory's Owner <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-15 14:16 -0800
Kensi's idiot, dice throwing, God. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-15 11:21 -0800
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-16 10:34 -0500
Re: Relf's idiot, wavefunction collapsing God. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 08:40 -0700
Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-16 14:28 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-17 12:15 -0500
Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-17 12:07 -0800
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:00 -0500
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:56 -0700
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:16 -0600
You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:45 -0800
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 15:52 -0700
Re: You can't prove the non existence of an UnImagined variable. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:16 -0500
I'm not mainstream. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:03 -0800
Re: I'm not mainstream. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:41 -0500
" this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-20 17:22 -0800
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:16 -0500
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 11:57 -0600
Re: " this loophole cannot be ignored " -- Alain Aspect, 2015. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:02 -0500
Choose your cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:27 -0800
Re: Choose your cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:46 -0500
Re: Choose your cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:55 -0700
Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-23 14:37 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:39 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:04 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:40 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 10:44 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-25 15:55 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:48 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-25 23:55 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:18 +0000
Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 22:19 -0800
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 06:24 +0000
Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-26 01:31 -0800
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:13 -0500
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-26 09:34 -0600
Re: Who is your favorite progressive ( alive today ) ? ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 20:55 -0700
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:16 -0500
Re: Jordan Peterson is quite rare. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-11-26 03:39 -0800
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:17 +0000
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 06:19 -0500
Re: Steven Spielberg has replaced Einstein ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:26 +0000
By definition, geniuses are rare. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: By definition, geniuses are rare. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 05:16 -0500
Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-27 06:33 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:08 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0800
Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 06:37 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 07:44 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0500
99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-28 07:39 -0800
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 12:00 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0700
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:37 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:36 -0500
Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:35 -0500
The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 06:19 -0800
Re: The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:21 -0500
We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-29 08:31 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:11 -0500
Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 05:09 -0800
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:29 -0500
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 +0000
Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:27 -0500
Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-30 13:46 -0800
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 16:41 -0600
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:28 -0500
Kensi is the KoOky one. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:28 -0800
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:33 -0500
See ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 06:48 -0800
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:55 -0500
I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-12-01 07:04 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:13 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:09 +0000
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:18 -0800
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 09:31 -0500
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:35 -0700
Re: I could be Taylor Swift, or the queen of England. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 14:47 -0800
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: See ? ! kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:27 -0500
Re: See ? ! "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 11:47 -0500
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: See ? ! Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:10 +0000
Re: See ? ! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0600
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 10:48 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:44 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:49 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:54 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 13:02 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:10 -0700
Re: See ? ! % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:22 -0700
Re: See ? ! Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:43 -0700
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 21:52 -0600
Re: Kensi is the KoOky one. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:09 -0500
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:51 -0700
Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-12-01 11:48 -0600
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0500
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-11-30 10:34 -0800
Re: Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 12:28 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2018-11-30 15:09 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:53 -0800
Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:59 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:23 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:33 -0600
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 15:54 -0500
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 18:51 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 13:54 -0800
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 14:57 -0700
Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:26 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:45 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:17 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:43 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 17:40 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:15 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:08 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:17 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 07:46 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 00:55 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:49 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:50 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 09:59 -0600
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:49 -0500
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:19 -0700
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:09 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:48 -0800
Re: Try again, you're off by 120 orders of magnitude. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:48 -0700
Einstein was right. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 10:57 -0800
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:32 +0000
72 robotic alien virgins. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 17:16 -0800
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:03 +0000
There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-21 20:32 -0800
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:46 +0000
Re: There's a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell to you. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:11 -0500
Kenzi's SciFi cult. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 12:02 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-23 10:08 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:51 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:56 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:47 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:53 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:57 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 22:06 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:23 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 17:40 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 15:48 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:47 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:01 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:41 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 16:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:46 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:42 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:44 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 00:04 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 08:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 09:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 11:14 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 11:26 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad813b404@gmail.invallid> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:00 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:05 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:13 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:21 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:26 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Fly Tape <flÿ@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:31 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 15:38 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 17:46 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-24 20:46 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 17:15 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Fly Tape" <fly@tape.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:23 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-25 00:46 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:49 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:17 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 23:23 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:07 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:17 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 20:25 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 17:50 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:55 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 01:44 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:51 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 00:05 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:51 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:20 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 22:37 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 05:43 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 23:33 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:37 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:16 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-27 04:28 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 16:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 14:45 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:46 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:12 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:03 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-11-25 06:58 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:20 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 09:32 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-25 09:49 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-26 03:19 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:56 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:59 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:04 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:16 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 16:14 -0600
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:29 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 19:43 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 20:05 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 06:00 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:48 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-25 05:59 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:45 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 23:04 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 16:08 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:29 +0000
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:31 -0700
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:53 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 09:41 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:48 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:21 -0800
Re: Kenzi's SciFi cult. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:51 -0800
qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-24 04:41 -0800
Re: qBism [cubism]: correlations without correlata. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-25 05:44 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:10 -0500
Re: 72 robotic alien virgins. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:08 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:07 -0500
Re: Einstein was right. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:29 +0000
Re: Einstein was right. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:34 -0700
Re: Einstein was right. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0500
Kooky like Einstein. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 14:35 -0800
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:14 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-23 01:36 +0000
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:47 -0700
I am crazy. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-22 20:17 -0800
Re: I am crazy. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:30 -0500
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:55 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 10:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-23 13:24 -0500
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 13:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:05 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 14:27 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:29 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:30 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:07 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:02 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:33 -0700
Re: I am crazy. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 19:48 -0500
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:54 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 16:58 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:30 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 12:04 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 21:55 +0000
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:58 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:38 -0800
Re: I am crazy. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:28 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:37 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 01:30 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:32 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 03:48 +0000
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:37 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 19:43 -0700
Re: I am crazy. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 17:55 -0800
Re: I am crazy. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:38 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 15:29 -0700
Re: Kooky like Einstein. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-29 09:47 +0000
Re: Asking 5 liars if they'll vote for Hillary or not. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-19 02:16 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:39 -0800
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 18:06 -0500
Re: Kenzi's (psedo)multiverse protects her (psedo)pride. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-18 13:01 -0500
When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-18 14:06 -0800
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-19 11:21 -0500
Re: When your drunk, DiceTossing god might pass out. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-19 10:53 -0600
The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-11-19 14:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 13:07 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 12:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-20 12:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 18:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:23 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 12:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 17:00 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 06:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 07:38 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 08:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:39 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 09:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-03 17:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 06:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-04 13:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-04 12:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 11:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-22 12:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:01 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-22 14:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 18:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-20 20:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-20 13:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 18:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-20 18:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 19:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:13 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 12:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-11-20 23:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-20 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-20 19:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-20 20:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-21 05:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ":2 Berger:" <hrumme4224@gmail.com> - 2018-11-20 23:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-21 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-21 14:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 17:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 15:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 22:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-21 16:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-21 23:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:26 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:27 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 22:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 02:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:27 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:42 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-21 17:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-11-22 00:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 17:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-21 18:52 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 01:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-21 21:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 05:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-22 12:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-22 13:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <tom@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-22 20:33 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 13:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 16:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 01:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-22 18:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-22 19:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-23 03:29 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 00:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 09:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 11:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 11:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 17:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-23 17:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 12:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 15:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 12:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 13:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:02 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-23 16:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-23 20:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-24 12:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:25 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-23 13:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-23 14:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 18:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-23 16:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-23 23:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregøry Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-24 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:43 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 21:56 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 14:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:02 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 15:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-24 22:08 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-24 19:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 01:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-25 04:52 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 18:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-24 16:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 21:20 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-24 19:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-24 22:08 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 07:08 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 08:57 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-25 08:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-25 11:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-26 20:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 18:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-11-27 07:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-26 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-26 19:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 07:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 09:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-27 08:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 06:21 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 03:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:35 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:34 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 07:47 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 12:40 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 19:07 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:30 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 18:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 21:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:20 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 19:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 22:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 21:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-28 21:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 09:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 10:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 08:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:34 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:16 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:45 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:15 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:45 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:04 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:05 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:28 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:19 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 01:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 21:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 07:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 08:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 14:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:59 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:48 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 09:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 15:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:16 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:12 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2018-11-29 17:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:54 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:01 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 Sir Gerg teh Yechh Master ""Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 11:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-02 20:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:23 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 12:07 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 20:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 00:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:40 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:59 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 13:09 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 11:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 21:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 02:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-12-01 09:30 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 10:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 17:59 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:52 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:09 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:51 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 18:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-30 10:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 12:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-12-02 18:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:29 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 22:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 22:02 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 19:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:46 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-12-01 19:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 16:59 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-11-29 17:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 18:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:40 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 19:48 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:41 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 15:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:12 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 16:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 15:55 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%.com> - 2018-12-02 17:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-03 15:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 16:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 19:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 20:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 18:24 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 21:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:13 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 07:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 10:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-03 08:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 23:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 20:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-28 12:27 -0500
Re: 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫 The psychotic racist white-supremacist taking a break from the stormfront discussion boards to post as "SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er>" 🔫🔫🔫⏰ POTENTIAL CLOCK TOWER SHOOTER ALERT! ⏰🔫🔫🔫❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. ❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄❄ Snowflake ❄ Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-28 12:21 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:51 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 12:17 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:19 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 00:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:24 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:31 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:46 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 09:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:46 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:35 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:04 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-01 13:03 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-28 13:04 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:01 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-29 01:10 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 10:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:21 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:22 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-28 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:57 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:22 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:31 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-29 13:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 00:18 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:34 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 01:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:04 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:20 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:50 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:49 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:12 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 15:18 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 16:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:50 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 05:21 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 05:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 10:10 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 10:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 11:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 13:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 14:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 12:31 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 15:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 13:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:18 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 14:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 16:31 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2018-11-30 09:55 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:58 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:36 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:33 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:14 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-11-30 10:36 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2018-11-29 15:16 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-29 18:38 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 18:55 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-29 17:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 18:52 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 20:12 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:37 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:14 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-29 17:17 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:03 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:10 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 09:52 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-30 11:14 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:51 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-30 08:54 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:11 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 05:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 06:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:00 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:49 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:50 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:48 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:03 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:05 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:13 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 09:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 08:14 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 07:57 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:28 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 10:23 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:10 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 16:12 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-29 18:42 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-29 20:42 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-11-30 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:53 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-30 10:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:19 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 11:58 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:16 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-30 20:47 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:43 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:15 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 11:43 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:37 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:47 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:00 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 10:07 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-11-30 11:35 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-30 22:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 07:36 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-01 08:29 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:51 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 09:01 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:02 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 20:25 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-11-30 21:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:00 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 06:58 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:38 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-12-01 18:49 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:13 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 07:56 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:27 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 07:26 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 09:45 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 09:25 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-04 13:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-04 11:08 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-04 12:37 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:28 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:30 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:21 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:06 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 16:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 14:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:25 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:28 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 07:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:00 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Spooge <sp00ge@goop.invalid> - 2018-12-02 16:19 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:07 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 10:53 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 07:50 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:18 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 08:24 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 11:54 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 12:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 09:45 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-02 13:22 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-12-02 11:33 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:05 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-03 09:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 21:01 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 07:18 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:06 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 17:54 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:53 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 12:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 15:05 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-01 23:36 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:39 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:42 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 00:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:26 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:32 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 20:57 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 16:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 19:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:44 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:30 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 06:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 17:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:14 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 18:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 06:09 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-02 00:20 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-12-02 07:40 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:39 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-03 08:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-03 14:29 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-03 14:54 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 08:55 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 13:06 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-29 19:15 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:28 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 08:56 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-30 11:33 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:56 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-30 18:58 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 07:48 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 09:41 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:49 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-12-01 11:34 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:36 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 17:03 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 15:11 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-01 18:03 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-12-01 16:10 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-12-01 22:39 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-12-02 10:13 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <%@%> - 2018-12-02 08:16 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 08:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-01 11:37 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 12:38 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-12-02 02:26 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-12-01 19:43 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-12-02 08:32 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:41 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2018-11-28 10:23 -0800
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 07:29 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2018-11-28 08:40 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-28 11:44 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 09:48 -0700
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 11:11 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 17:20 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-28 12:02 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. Tammy <frenchielamour69@gmail.com> - 2018-11-28 20:17 +0000
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. AOC <AOC@mineshot.org> - 2018-11-28 16:11 -0500
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-11-29 06:46 -0600
Re: The great unwashed, who don't understand statistics. skimmer <skimmy@icanthearu.net> - 2018-11-29 10:29 -0500
Page 4 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 50 Next page →
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 06:37 -0800 |
| Subject | Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.28--6.37am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #715066 |
Kensi replied: > > Gravity is residual exergy, entropy is killing it off, eventually > > leaving us with a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy, > > but none of the eXergy ( as Lord Kelvin predicted, 1852 ). > > Now you're just repeating yourself. > Now you're just repeating yourself. > Ko0kiness level: SSCG(3). Unlike you, I don't have to repeat myself; nor do I have to _ dismiss entropy, and the cosmological constant, as you do. WikiPedia: If the cosmological constant is positive, as appears to be the case in recent observations, the temperature will asymptote to a non-zero positive value, and the universe will approach a state of maximum entropy. Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? Gravity is residual exergy, entropy is killing it off. The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, not a blunder.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 07:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? |
| Message-ID | <bpiv53.o31.17.14@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #715094 |
On 2018-11-28 7:37 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> Gravity is residual exergy, entropy is killing it off, eventually >>> leaving us with a uniform heat bath that has all of the energy, >>> but none of the eXergy ( as Lord Kelvin predicted, 1852 ). >> >> Now you're just repeating yourself. >> Now you're just repeating yourself. >> Ko0kiness level: SSCG(3). > > Unlike you, I don't have to repeat myself; > nor do I have to _ dismiss entropy, > and the cosmological constant, as you do. > > WikiPedia: > > If the cosmological constant is positive, > as appears to be the case in recent observations, > the temperature will asymptote to a non-zero positive value, > and the universe will approach a state of maximum entropy. > > Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? > > Gravity is residual exergy, entropy is killing it off. > > The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, not a blunder. > you said this already
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 09:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? |
| Message-ID | <ptm9sb$1hnu$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715094 |
On 11/28/2018 9:37 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, not a blunder. It has no explanatory value! It's just a fudge factor! A real achievement would be understanding the causing quantum field! -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 07:39 -0800 |
| Subject | 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.28--7.39am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #715097 |
Kensi replied: > > Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? > > The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, > > not a blunder. > > It has no explanatory value! It's just a fudge factor! > A real achievement would be understanding the causing quantum field! "Entropy and the cosmological constant" explains the uniform, isotropic, expotentially expanding Universe that we observe. No need for your wild imaginations, like the graviton, string theory, and the bullshit worlds you love to hide in. 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 12:00 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. |
| Message-ID | <ptmhiq$1a3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715112 |
On 11/28/2018 10:39 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? >>> The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, >>> not a blunder. >> >> It has no explanatory value! It's just a fudge factor! >> A real achievement would be understanding the causing quantum field! > > "Entropy and the cosmological constant" explains the uniform, > isotropic, expotentially expanding Universe that we observe. Total bullshit. Big Bang is biggest mistake of all physics. > No need for your wild imaginations, like the graviton, > string theory, and the bullshit worlds you love to hide in. This is true, R0lf. > 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. 99% of all scientists have yet to catch up to Maxwell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-28 10:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. |
| Message-ID | <bpj7a5.l84.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #715146 |
On 2018-11-28 10:00 AM, benj wrote: > On 11/28/2018 10:39 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi replied: >>>> Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? >>>> The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, >>>> not a blunder. >>> >>> It has no explanatory value! It's just a fudge factor! >>> A real achievement would be understanding the causing quantum field! >> >> "Entropy and the cosmological constant" explains the uniform, >> isotropic, expotentially expanding Universe that we observe. > > Total bullshit. Big Bang is biggest mistake of all physics. > >> No need for your wild imaginations, like the graviton, >> string theory, and the bullshit worlds you love to hide in. > > This is true, R0lf. > >> 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. > > 99% of all scientists have yet to catch up to Maxwell. > > nobody has caught up to me , yay
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 05:37 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. |
| Message-ID | <ptofh1$19m3$6@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715147 |
On 11/28/2018 12:03 PM, % wrote: > On 2018-11-28 10:00 AM, benj wrote: >> On 11/28/2018 10:39 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. >> >> 99% of all scientists have yet to catch up to Maxwell. > > nobody has caught up to me , yay That's because we all started out already *past* you, ko0ky. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 05:36 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. |
| Message-ID | <ptoffg$19m3$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715146 |
On 11/28/2018 12:00 PM, benj wrote: > On 11/28/2018 10:39 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi replied: >>>> Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? >>>> The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, >>>> not a blunder. >>> >>> It has no explanatory value! It's just a fudge factor! >>> A real achievement would be understanding the causing quantum field! >> >> "Entropy and the cosmological constant" explains the uniform, >> isotropic, expotentially expanding Universe that we observe. > > Total bullshit. Big Bang is biggest mistake of all physics. *starts popcorn* Do tell? *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 05:35 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. |
| Message-ID | <ptofee$19m3$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715112 |
On 11/28/2018 10:39 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? >>> The cosmological constant is Einstein's greatest achievement, >>> not a blunder. >> >> It has no explanatory value! It's just a fudge factor! >> A real achievement would be understanding the causing quantum field! > > "Entropy and the cosmological constant" explains the uniform, > isotropic, expotentially expanding Universe that we observe. No, not really. "Dark energy" could, if we knew more about what exactly it is. I hope the LHC will shed some light on dark energy, and also on dark matter, sometime soon. > No need for your wild imaginations, like the graviton, > string theory, and the bullshit worlds you love to hide in. > > 99% of scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein. Don't be ridiculous. We've surpassed him, decades ago, in a very many ways (though especially in the realm of quantum physics). -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 06:19 -0800 |
| Subject | The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.29--6.19am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #715327 |
Kensi replied:
> > "Entropy and the cosmological constant" explains the uniform,
> > isotropic, expotentially expanding Universe that we observe.
>
> No, not really.
Yes, really. WikiPedia: <<
If the cosmological constant is positive,
-- as appears to be the case in recent observations --,
the temperature will asymptote to a non-zero positive value,
and the universe will approach a state of maximum entropy. >>
Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ?
Gravity is residual exergy, entropy is killing it off.
> "Dark energy" could, if we knew more about what exactly it is.
" The cosmological constant Λ is the simplest possible explanation
for dark energy, and is used in the current standard
model of cosmology known as the ΛCDM model. " -- WikiPedia
> I hope the LHC will shed some light on dark energy,
Good luck, they're only off by 120 orders of magnitude.
No need for such wild imaginations, like
the graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds.
Choose your cult:
SuperDeterminism ( Spinoza, Einstein and Me ):
Sure, our ignorance ( not the cat's "randomness" ) is real,
-- we don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive;
but "Local Realism" (causality) doesn't need our recognition.
qBism uses an AgreedUpon (SI) standard to reduced the wavefunction
to AgreedUpon probabilities upon which one might (subjectively) bet.
One might (subjectively) bet that entanglement is a real phenomenon,
"knowing" |Up> in one location will be |Down> in another;
no faster than light anything; no bullshit worlds.
YouTube.COM/watch?v=LQvCTZgNRNw
YouTube.COM/watch?v=95fKJF5frtE
MultiVerse ( Stephen Hawking, Brian Greene and ComicCon ):
Before EachAndEvery NanoChange, a universe duplicates itself;
because ComicCon SciFi pays better than real science.
> > Many of today's scientists have yet to catch up to Einstein.
>
> Don't be ridiculous. We've surpassed him, decades ago,
> in a very many ways ( especially quantum physics ).
No, you're way _ behind him.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 10:21 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The graviton, string theory, and bullshit worlds. |
| Message-ID | <ptp05p$a34$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715342 |
On 11/29/2018 9:19 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > " The cosmological constant Λ is the simplest possible explanation > for dark energy, and is used in the current standard It's not an "explanation" at all. It's a fudge factor. > qBism Solipsistic nonsense. See: Bacciagaluppi, Guido (2014-01-01). "A Critic Looks at QBism". In Galavotti, Maria Carla; Dieks, Dennis; Gonzalez, Wenceslao J.; Hartmann, Stephan; Uebel, Thomas; Weber, Marcel. New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective. Springer International Publishing. pp. 403–416. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-29 08:31 -0800 |
| Subject | We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.29--8.31am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #715349 |
Kensi replied: > > qBism > > Solipsistic nonsense. qBism is a combination of AgreedUpon (SI) probabilities and "Shut up and calculate"; as such, it's far more economical and effective than hiding in bullshit worlds, as you do. "Plato.Stanford.EDU": << Pragmatists agree with QBists that quantum theory should not be thought to offer a description or representation of physical reality: in particular, to ascribe a quantum state is not to describe physical reality. >> It's our _ ignorance ( not the cat's "randomness" ) that is real, -- we don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. "Shut up and calculate" and the cosmological constant are mainstream. > > " The cosmological constant Λ is the simplest possible explanation > > for dark energy, and is used in the current standard > > It's not an "explanation" at all. It's a fudge factor. You should edit the WikiPedia entry, then, as if being 120 orders of magnitude off were better.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 06:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: We don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. |
| Message-ID | <ptr5to$1skp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715393 |
On 11/29/2018 11:31 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> qBism >> >> Solipsistic nonsense. > > qBism is a combination of AgreedUpon (SI) probabilities and > "Shut up and calculate"; as such, it's far more economical > and effective than hiding in bullshit worlds, as you do. Get real. It's one of those interpretations that says there's something magical about blobs of carbon atoms if they happen to be arranged in a manner sufficiently resembling brains. A quick run-down makes it clear that the only *rational* choices are MWI, Relational, Cosmological (if they can figure out how that can produce wave interference, that is), and *maybe*, as dark horse candidates *at best*, the nonlocal hidden variable ones like Transactional. > "Shut up and calculate" and the cosmological constant are mainstream. So was geocentrism, once. >>> " The cosmological constant Λ is the simplest possible explanation >>> for dark energy, and is used in the current standard >> >> It's not an "explanation" at all. It's a fudge factor. > > You should edit the WikiPedia entry, then, > as if being 120 orders of magnitude off were better. Where are you getting that from? You keep harping on it, kO0k, without actually explaining WTF you're burbling about. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 05:09 -0800 |
| Subject | Kensi's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.30--5.09am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #715678 |
Kensi replied:
> > "Shut up and calculate" and the cosmological constant are mainstream.
>
> So was geocentrism, once.
You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ),
and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ).
> > You should edit the WikiPedia entry, then,
> > as if being 120 orders of magnitude off were better.
>
> Where are you getting that from? You keep harping on it, kO0k,
> without actually explaining WTF you're burbling about.
From " Dark Energy and the Preposterous Universe "
by Sean M. Carroll, Enrico Fermi Institute
( YouTube.COM/user/seancarroll/videos ):
...the potential energy of the Higgs field...
...the condensate of quark bilinears...
...zero-point vacuum fluctuations...
This is the famous 120-orders-of-magnitude discrepancy
that makes the cosmological constant problem such a glaring embarrassment.
WikiPedia: <<
If the cosmological constant is positive,
-- as appears to be the case in recent observations --,
the temperature will asymptote to a non-zero positive value,
and the universe will approach a state of maximum entropy. >>
Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ?
Gravity is residual exergy, entropy ( negative pressure ) is killing it off.
> > qBism is a combination of AgreedUpon (SI) probabilities and
> > "Shut up and calculate"; as such, it's far more economical
> > and effective than hiding in bullshit worlds, as you do.
>
> Get real. It's one of those interpretations that says there's something
> magical about blobs of carbon atoms if they happen to be arranged in a
> manner sufficiently resembling brains.
"magical blobs" ? ! Where did you hear that, Twitter ?
Maximal consumption has been programmed into us ( by nature ).
Ways to do it:
1. Live Fast ( consume more now ), Die Fast.
2. Live Slow, Die Later ( consume longer ).
3. Sacrifice yourself for the tribe, so they can consume more, longer.
Either way, the (PreProgrammed) objective is the same: consume.
We ( you, me, and the stars ) consume what we can, given our options.
"Shut up and calculate" works best because it doesn't conjure up bullshit worlds
nor bullshit SuperPositions. Our ignorance ( not the cat's "randomness" )
is _ REAL; we don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive.
> A quick run-down makes it clear that the only *rational* choices are
> MWI, Relational, Cosmological (if they can figure out how that can
> produce wave interference, that is), and *maybe*, as dark horse
> candidates *at best*, the nonlocal hidden variable ones like Transactional.
The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 11:29 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. |
| Message-ID | <ptroha$135i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715686 |
On 11/30/2018 8:09 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> "Shut up and calculate" and the cosmological constant are mainstream. >> >> So was geocentrism, once. > > You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), > and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... !>>> You should edit the WikiPedia entry, then, !>>> as if being 120 orders of magnitude off were better. !>> !>> Where are you getting that from? You keep harping on it, kO0k, !>> without actually explaining WTF you're burbling about. !> !> From " Dark Energy and the Preposterous Universe " !> by Sean M. Carroll, Enrico Fermi Institute !> ( YouTube.COM/user/seancarroll/videos ): !> !> ...the potential energy of the Higgs field... !> ...the condensate of quark bilinears... !> ...zero-point vacuum fluctuations... !> This is the famous 120-orders-of-magnitude discrepancy !> that makes the cosmological constant problem such a glaring embarrassment. !> !> WikiPedia: << !> !> If the cosmological constant is positive, !> -- as appears to be the case in recent observations --, !> the temperature will asymptote to a non-zero positive value, !> and the universe will approach a state of maximum entropy. >> !> !> Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? !> Gravity is residual exergy, entropy ( negative pressure ) is killing it off. !> !>>> qBism is a combination of AgreedUpon (SI) probabilities and !>>> "Shut up and calculate"; as such, it's far more economical !>>> and effective than hiding in bullshit worlds, as you do. !>> !>> Get real. It's one of those interpretations that says there's something !>> magical about blobs of carbon atoms if they happen to be arranged in a !>> manner sufficiently resembling brains. !> !> "magical blobs" ? ! Where did you hear that, Twitter ? !> !> Maximal consumption has been programmed into us ( by nature ). !> Ways to do it: !> !> 1. Live Fast ( consume more now ), Die Fast. !> 2. Live Slow, Die Later ( consume longer ). !> 3. Sacrifice yourself for the tribe, so they can consume more, longer. !> !> Either way, the (PreProgrammed) objective is the same: consume. !> We ( you, me, and the stars ) consume what we can, given our options. !> !> "Shut up and calculate" works best because it doesn't conjure up bullshit worlds !> nor bullshit SuperPositions. Our ignorance ( not the cat's "randomness" ) !> is _ REAL; we don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. !> !>> A quick run-down makes it clear that the only *rational* choices are !>> MWI, Relational, Cosmological (if they can figure out how that can !>> produce wave interference, that is), and *maybe*, as dark horse !>> candidates *at best*, the nonlocal hidden variable ones like Transactional. !> !> The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 21:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. |
| Message-ID | <pts8e9$v5e$46@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #715723 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:29:31 -0500, kensi wrote: > On 11/30/2018 8:09 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> Kensi replied: >>>> "Shut up and calculate" and the cosmological constant are mainstream. >>> >>> So was geocentrism, once. >> >> You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), >> and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). > > If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, > Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, > Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... I don't know who most of those are (Hawking I recognize and you've mentioned Tegmark before in connection with some multiverse thingy) but I've a feeling Relf just got massively SPNAKed. <snicker> > !>>> You should edit the WikiPedia entry, then, > !>>> as if being 120 orders of magnitude off were better. > !>> > !>> Where are you getting that from? You keep harping on it, kO0k, > !>> without actually explaining WTF you're burbling about. > !> > !> From " Dark Energy and the Preposterous Universe " > !> by Sean M. Carroll, Enrico Fermi Institute !> ( > YouTube.COM/user/seancarroll/videos ): > !> > !> ...the potential energy of the Higgs field... > !> ...the condensate of quark bilinears... > !> ...zero-point vacuum fluctuations... > !> This is the famous 120-orders-of-magnitude discrepancy !> that > makes the cosmological constant problem such a glaring embarrassment. > !> > !> WikiPedia: << > !> > !> If the cosmological constant is positive, > !> -- as appears to be the case in recent observations --, > !> the temperature will asymptote to a non-zero positive value, > !> and the universe will approach a state of maximum entropy. >> > !> > !> Why wouldn't entropy apply to a hot star in a cold vacuum ? > !> Gravity is residual exergy, entropy ( negative pressure ) is killing > it off. > !> > !>>> qBism is a combination of AgreedUpon (SI) probabilities and !>>> > "Shut up and calculate"; as such, it's far more economical !>>> and > effective than hiding in bullshit worlds, as you do. > !>> > !>> Get real. It's one of those interpretations that says there's > something !>> magical about blobs of carbon atoms if they happen to be > arranged in a !>> manner sufficiently resembling brains. > !> > !> "magical blobs" ? ! Where did you hear that, Twitter ? > !> > !> Maximal consumption has been programmed into us ( by nature ). > !> Ways to do it: > !> > !> 1. Live Fast ( consume more now ), Die Fast. > !> 2. Live Slow, Die Later ( consume longer ). > !> 3. Sacrifice yourself for the tribe, so they can consume more, > longer. > !> > !> Either way, the (PreProgrammed) objective is the same: consume. > !> We ( you, me, and the stars ) consume what we can, given our > options. > !> > !> "Shut up and calculate" works best because it doesn't conjure up > bullshit worlds !> nor bullshit SuperPositions. Our ignorance ( not the > cat's "randomness" ) > !> is _ REAL; we don't know if Schrodinger's cat is dead or alive. > !> > !>> A quick run-down makes it clear that the only *rational* choices are > !>> MWI, Relational, Cosmological (if they can figure out how that can > !>> produce wave interference, that is), and *maybe*, as dark horse !>> > candidates *at best*, the nonlocal hidden variable ones like > Transactional. > !> > !> The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. > > KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. I'm not even going to ask. I'm instead going to presume this is a likely typo of "R'Lyeh's number" and leave it at that. :) -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 07:27 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Relf's useless, unfalsifiable assumptions. |
| Message-ID | <pttuna$fkc$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715781 |
On 11/30/2018 4:00 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:29:31 -0500, kensi wrote: > >> On 11/30/2018 8:09 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >> !> The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. >> >> KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. > > I'm not even going to ask. I'm instead going to presume this is a likely > typo of "R'Lyeh's number" LOL > and leave it at that. :) OK, I'll wait until you have gotten more Tylenol then. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 13:46 -0800 |
| Subject | Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.30--1.46pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #715723 |
Kensi replied: > > You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), > > and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). > > If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, > Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, > Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... Because science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ > > The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. > > KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. ...she said, contemplating her life.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-11-30 16:41 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ |
| Message-ID | <RYOdnXNn_t8AIZzBnZ2dnUU7-cHNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #715790 |
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:46:58 -0800 (Seattle), LO AND BEHOLD; Jeff-Relf.Me @. determined that the following was of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us in <Jeff-Relf.Me@Nov.30--1.46pm.Seattle.2018>: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Kensi replied: ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ ✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡✡ Because science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ does it sell better than fossil fuels do, k0ok? is the science fiction industry propped up by taxpayer subsidies? <snip> -- [THIS POAST HAS PASSED TRIMCHECK® VALIDATION] THIS SPACE FOR RENT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA "Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer, and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate) "Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan) - "You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor - "If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode - "I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com> - Golden Killfile, June 2005 KOTM, November 2006 Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006 Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007 Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006 Busted Urinal Award, April 2007 Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006 Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008 Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007 AUK Mascot, September 2007 Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-12-01 07:28 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ |
| Message-ID | <pttup7$fkc$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #715790 |
On 11/30/2018 4:46 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi replied: >>> You're making useless, unfalsifiable assumptions ( bullshit worlds ), >>> and you're straying far from accepted science ( Lambda, CDM ). >> >> If so, then I'm in distinguished company. Everett, Wheeler, Hawking, >> Deutsch, DeWitt, Tipler, Albrecht, Zurek, Polley, Sebens, Carroll, >> Vaidman, Lockwood, Tegmark ... > > Because science FICTION sells better than the real thing $ $ $ > >>> The Copenhagen Interpretation was right; and it still is. >> >> KoOkiness l3v3l: Rayo's number. > > ...she said, contemplating her life. OK, since you're evidently reduced to IKYABWAIs now let's just consider the matter closed shall we? *does a little victory dance* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web