Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #533037 > unrolled thread

Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ?

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 16:48 +0000
    Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2015-11-14 18:09 +0100
      Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 18:37 +0000
        Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 14:51 -0500
          Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
          Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:11 +0000
            Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-11-14 12:21 -0800
              Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 20:25 +0000
              Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:22 -0500
              Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 11:04 -0600
                Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-16 18:56 +0000
            Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-11-14 16:17 -0500
              Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ? Ty Knotts <TyKnotts@hotmail.org> - 2015-11-14 21:22 +0000

#533037 — Re: Could gravitational energy have a spectrum of colors ?

W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Y napisał:

> I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the
> surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of
> wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system, colors
> could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in detail and
> "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light.

Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so 
inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when you 
say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific wavelength, 
aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to be taken up 
and debate.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#533042

Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:48 Ty Knotts napsal(a):
> W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Y napisał:
> 
>> I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the
>> surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of
>> wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system, colors
>> could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in detail and
>> "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light.
> 
> Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so 
> inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when you 
> say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific wavelength, 
> aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to be taken up 
> and debate.
> 
DM disqualifies you by its own.

-- 
Poutnik ( the Czech word for a wanderer )

Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533053

W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Poutnik napisał:

> Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:48 Ty Knotts napsal(a):
>> W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Y napisał:
>> 
>>> I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the
>>> surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of
>>> wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system,
>>> colors could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in
>>> detail and "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light.
>> 
>> Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so
>> inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when
>> you say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific
>> wavelength, aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to
>> be taken up and debate.
>> 
> DM disqualifies you by its own.

Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still be 
valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that 
"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is 
exactly what my Divergent Matter says.

You are peripheral, or rather not even.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533086

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:37:11 +0000 (UTC), Ty Knotts
<TyKnotts@hotmail.org> wrote:

>W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) uzytkownik Poutnik napisal:
>
>> Dne 14/11/2015 v 17:48 Ty Knotts napsal(a):
>>> W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) uzytkownik Y napisal:
>>> 
>>>> I disagree. The surface conditions of green plants are such that the
>>>> surfaces of plants reflect the green component (of a certain range of
>>>> wavelengths). I put it to you, that with the appropriate system,
>>>> colors could be objectively classified by looking at surfaces in
>>>> detail and "how" they reflect certain wavelengths of white light.
>>> 
>>> Naturally, that's the whole idea in having colors. Poutink is so
>>> inexperienced in Physics and Divergent Matter, not realizing that when
>>> you say a specific color, you implicitly substitute to a specific
>>> wavelength, aka a specific NUMBER. Which numbers cannot be something to
>>> be taken up and debate.
>>> 
>> DM disqualifies you by its own.
>
>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still be 
>valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that 
>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is 
>exactly what my Divergent Matter says.
>
>You are peripheral, or rather not even.

         Somebody should ty knots in you neck,
you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533090

W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał:

>>> DM disqualifies you by its own.
>>
>>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still
>>be valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that
>>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is
>>exactly what my Divergent Matter says.
>>
>>You are peripheral, or rather not even.
> 
>          Somebody should ty knots in you neck,
> you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll.

What do you mean by "insincere"?? Anything but that, young man. Why this 
much oppressively oriented? You are not going to say that my theory, The 
Theory, is false, are you?

In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt of 
an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533091

W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał:

>>> DM disqualifies you by its own.
>>
>>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still
>>be valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that
>>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is
>>exactly what my Divergent Matter says.
>>
>>You are peripheral, or rather not even.
> 
>          Somebody should ty knots in you neck,
> you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll.

What do you mean by "insincere"?? Anything but that, young man. Why this 
much oppressively oriented? You are not going to say that my theory, The 
Theory, is false, are you?

In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt of 
an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533095 — Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

"Ty_Knotts",  Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting, 
how should I indentify your posts ?

Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533096 — Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Jeff-Relf.Me
napisał:

> "Ty_Knotts",  Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting,
> how should I indentify your posts ?
> 
> Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

I dont understand you. Interested in something specific in Math and 
Physics, or you just waste your time, something you use to waste anyway. 
You may block the entire Internet, if is this what you really wish.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533112 — Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:21:07 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> wrote:

>"Ty_Knotts",  Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting, 
>how should I indentify your posts ?
>
>Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

         He will just switch to google groups,
he obviously also has access to a number
of different platforms, he must be a janitor
for a big company or college, like Plutonium.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533500 — Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

On 11/14/2015 2:21 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
> "Ty_Knotts",  Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting,
> how should I indentify your posts ?
>
> Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?
>

The nym-shifter spends at least twelve clicks to create a new nym. It 
takes me one click to filter it out. I say let him waste his time.

-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533549 — Re: Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?

W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik Odd Bodkin
napisał:

> On 11/14/2015 2:21 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>> "Ty_Knotts",  Seeing as you're constantly nymshifting,
>> how should I indentify your posts ?
>>
>> Should I just block anything and everything from "Aioe.ORG" ?
>>
> The nym-shifter spends at least twelve clicks to create a new nym. It
> takes me one click to filter it out. I say let him waste his time.

No idea what you two are talking about, but listen, your stupidity is sort 
of impossible to filter out, No matter how much try to click.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533110

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:11:01 +0000 (UTC), Ty Knotts
<TyKnotts@hotmail.org> wrote:

>W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) uzytkownik kefischer napisal:
>
>>>> DM disqualifies you by its own.
>>>
>>>Not even in thousands of years from now. My Divergent Matter will still
>>>be valid. It precedes infact Relativity by its own "postulate", that
>>>"Gravity" and an "accelerated elevator" are INDISTINGUISHABLE. Which is
>>>exactly what my Divergent Matter says.
>>>
>>>You are peripheral, or rather not even.
>> 
>>          Somebody should ty knots in you neck,
>> you stupid, insincere, lying, nym-changing troll.
>
>What do you mean by "insincere"?? Anything but that, young man. Why this 
>much oppressively oriented? You are not going to say that my theory, The 
>Theory, is false, are you?

       Your theory is not "The Theory", you don't
even have a theory, all you have is muddled
brain waves, trying to hide your identity behind
stupid synonym names.


>In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt of 
>an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral.

       Meet me in Strasbourg, and you will
see what  quarrelsome can be.

       And changing your nym won't help.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#533113

W dniu Sat, 07 Nov 2015 07:33:26 +0600 (PDT) użytkownik kefischer napisał:

>>In which case I need quarrelsome arguments, not this two cents attempt
>>of an imput, worth nothing. You are not even peripheral.
> 
>        Meet me in Strasbourg, and you will
> see what  quarrelsome can be.

You are such of an argumentative, only. I cant maintain a sober Scientific 
discussion with you. Your level appears choleric, pugnacious and 
dissentious, but still ways too low.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web