Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #683663 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 123 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-04 01:16 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-04 23:06 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 02:56 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-05 06:58 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-05 12:29 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-05 15:14 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 06:13 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-06 09:10 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 09:23 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-06 11:30 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-06 12:31 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-06 23:13 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:02 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Brennus <brennus@allia.org> - 2018-05-07 17:04 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 12:36 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:25 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:52 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 20:19 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:28 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 17:21 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 16:17 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 21:04 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 20:31 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:21 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:22 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:25 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:33 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:55 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:06 -0400
Magnetic South wanders around and varies. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 07:41 -0700
Re: Magnetic South wanders around and varies. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:36 -0400
Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 10:15 -0700
Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:02 -0400
Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-09 08:55 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 19:25 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:06 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-09 22:18 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 15:24 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 18:25 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 16:51 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 19:09 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 17:17 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-09 19:17 -0700
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-10 08:13 +0100
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-09 16:33 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 21:21 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:06 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 07:08 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 09:18 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 10:54 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 08:58 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-10 11:00 -0400
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:22 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:34 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 16:18 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 22:47 +0000
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Skeeter DoW 420 <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-10 09:25 -0600
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-10 10:21 -0500
Re: Large Arctic ozone hole linked to solar wind activity. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-10 20:36 +0000
Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500
Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:07 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:26 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 18:27 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:05 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:42 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 10:36 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-07 11:48 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 11:03 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:28 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:50 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:35 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 21:18 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 03:30 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 23:00 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 06:08 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 09:56 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 08:26 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-08 12:40 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:36 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 19:58 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Skeeter <fnvw@invalid.invalid> - 2018-05-08 14:02 -0600
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 13:10 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 20:12 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:34 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-08 14:25 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 17:24 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 23:19 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 22:20 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-09 07:09 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 20:34 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 15:15 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:40 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 14:56 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 13:49 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-07 19:27 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-07 15:02 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-07 20:45 -0400
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-08 01:37 +0000
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-07 22:32 -0700
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-05-08 10:01 -0500
Re: I wouldn't bang some skanky ass porn whore who's taken it up the ass from hundreds of skeezers benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-08 15:06 -0400
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 15:01 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer. |
| Message-ID | <pcvk29$aob$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684527 |
On 5/9/2018 6:02 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/8/2018 1:15 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>>> destroying the ozone with CFCs >>>> >>>> Where's your DoubleBlind study ? it can't be done. >>>> Magnetic South wanders around and varies. >>> >>> Objection: relevance? >> >> Charged particles from the sun destroy the ozone layer, >> and it ( Magnetic South ) moves around, varies. > > Wrong. Ultraviolet light combined with certain chemicals (such as CFCs) > destroys the ozone layer. The ozone hole is in the antarctic because > there's a vortex of air there at the stratosphere that traps things like > CFCs and concentrates them. Nothing to do with magnetism. > you are behind 10 to 30 years => CFCs use was banned in 1987 https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080224122540AA08In8
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 09:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcsdlc$13bq$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684307 |
On 5/8/2018 5:06 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/8/2018 1:55 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> >>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >>> >>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. >> >> History tells us that those who DO remember history are also doomed to >> repeat it. Those who understand the true nature of humanity understand >> that. > > Then why is now so very different from, say, 1000 years ago? The Holy Roman Empire and Poland concluded the Pease of Bautzen. Henry I of Austria died. Taxes were imposed in England. Count Dirk III defeats an army sent by Emperor Henry II in the Battle of Vlaardingen. (29. July 1018) Byzantine general Eustathios Daphnomeles blinds and captures Ibatzes of Bulgaria by a ruse, thereby ending Bulgarian resistance against Emperor Basil II's conquest of Bulgaria. (15. August 1018) only difference is now we have cellphones, TV sets, computers all with targeted ads. > > Because eventually, someone did learn from history. > >> This is why I keep telling you that whether climate change is caused my >> human activity or not is purely academic, because our nature and our >> needs have us locked into what's easiest, profitable (for some) and >> convenient (for all). > > If your nihilistic reasoning were correct, we'd still be destroying the > ozone with CFCs and the peregrine falcon would be extinct from all the > ongoing DDT use. wrong again, lawyers have to make money, and grab and create issues they can take into court and make a lot of money. why is the "opioid crises" suddenly in the news ? Lawyers following big tobacco playbook. Asbestos, think class action... > > But your nihilistic reasoning is not meant to be correct, is it? It's > meant to let you stick your head in the sand and ignore the world's > problems without guilt. but you don't discuss the issues, you only beat others over the head with your leftist ideals, which most have no common sense, and are not justifiable. > > Your self-deceiving kind are almost worse than the overtly kleptocratic > and sociopathic CEO/politician types. You want to know why? Because > though at least you're not *actively* being part of the problem, you're > far more numerous than those who are. It recalls to mind what MLK Jr. > once said about the "white moderate". racist too! > >> Much will be said, little will be done. Too little, too late. > > Cynics like you said that about CFCs and DDT, too. They were wrong. You > are wrong. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 08:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.8--8.19am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #684337 |
> why is the "opioid crises" suddenly in the news ? > Lawyers following big tobacco playbook. Cars used to kill the young, more than anything else; -- now it's drugs. Tobacco is relatively benign. I wish I knew why tobacco is so hated, but I don't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 08:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <SFgIC.96479$o43.43093@fx33.iad> |
| In reply to | #684261 |
On 5/7/2018 9:33 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, > > Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. > >> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? > > Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in > computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at it. > > History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened more > than a few *hours* ago. :P > Why do libs ALWAYS accuse others of being the way they are? Are their little fantasy worlds so limited that they can't possibly imagine diversity?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 12:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcsjrg$1e6u$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684319 |
On 5/8/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote: > On 5/7/2018 9:33 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >> >> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. >> >>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >> >> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in >> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at it. >> >> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened more >> than a few *hours* ago. :P > > Why do libs ALWAYS accuse others of being the way they are? Are their > little fantasy worlds so limited that they can't possibly imagine > diversity? Your total failure to address any point Nadegda raised has been noted and recorded. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 15:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <0BmIC.126962$DS3.114590@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #684352 |
On 5/8/2018 12:39 PM, kensi wrote: > On 5/8/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote: >> On 5/7/2018 9:33 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >>> >>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. >>> >>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >>> >>> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in >>> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at it. >>> >>> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened more >>> than a few *hours* ago. :P >> >> Why do libs ALWAYS accuse others of being the way they are? Are their >> little fantasy worlds so limited that they can't possibly imagine >> diversity? > > Your total failure to address any point Nadegda raised has been noted > and recorded. > Since the pair of you socks are only interested in personalities and fantasy and have no interest in science or actual facts your remarks are irrelevant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 19:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pcsve5$ci8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684381 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: > On 5/8/2018 12:39 PM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 5/7/2018 9:33 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >>>> >>>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. >>>> >>>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >>>> >>>> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in >>>> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at >>>> it. >>>> >>>> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened >>>> more than a few *hours* ago. :P >>> >>> Why do libs ALWAYS accuse others of being the way they are? Are their >>> little fantasy worlds so limited that they can't possibly imagine >>> diversity? >> >> Your total failure to address any point Nadegda raised has been noted >> and recorded. > > Since the pair of you socks Proof? > are only interested in personalities and fantasy and have no interest in > science or actual facts Proof? > your remarks are irrelevant. Wrong. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 17:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oxoIC.66530$wG5.10682@fx02.iad> |
| In reply to | #684395 |
On 5/8/2018 3:56 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 5/8/2018 12:39 PM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/8/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 5/7/2018 9:33 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >>>>> >>>>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. >>>>> >>>>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >>>>> >>>>> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in >>>>> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened >>>>> more than a few *hours* ago. :P >>>> >>>> Why do libs ALWAYS accuse others of being the way they are? Are their >>>> little fantasy worlds so limited that they can't possibly imagine >>>> diversity? >>> >>> Your total failure to address any point Nadegda raised has been noted >>> and recorded. >> >> Since the pair of you socks > > Proof? > >> are only interested in personalities and fantasy and have no interest in >> science or actual facts > > Proof? > >> your remarks are irrelevant. > > Wrong. > As proven liar your assertions are irrelevant.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 14:23 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8pq0q.94o.19.2@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684413 |
On 2018-05-08 2:21 PM, benj wrote: > On 5/8/2018 3:56 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: >> >>> On 5/8/2018 12:39 PM, kensi wrote: >>>> On 5/8/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote: >>>>> On 5/7/2018 9:33 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: >>>>>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, >>>>>> >>>>>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in >>>>>> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at >>>>>> it. >>>>>> >>>>>> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened >>>>>> more than a few *hours* ago. :P >>>>> >>>>> Why do libs ALWAYS accuse others of being the way they are? Are their >>>>> little fantasy worlds so limited that they can't possibly imagine >>>>> diversity? >>>> >>>> Your total failure to address any point Nadegda raised has been noted >>>> and recorded. >>> >>> Since the pair of you socks >> >> Proof? >> >>> are only interested in personalities and fantasy and have no interest in >>> science or actual facts >> >> Proof? >> >>> your remarks are irrelevant. >> >> Wrong. >> > As proven liar your assertions are irrelevant. that's a lie
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 14:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355bb678422b90e8993948@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #684395 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pcsve5$ci8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: > > > On 5/8/2018 12:39 PM, kensi wrote: > >> On 5/8/2018 8:24 AM, benj wrote: > >>> On 5/7/2018 9:33 PM, Nadegda wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 07 May 2018 17:21:10 -0500, Sergio wrote: > >>>>> you bringing up Eisenhower, Stalin, *only old folks* remember them, > >>>> > >>>> Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it. > >>>> > >>>>> so, where did you get your degree, and what in ? > >>>> > >>>> Did you miss kensi's post just a short time ago that said mine was in > >>>> computer science? Oh, wait, you can't have, because you frothed at > >>>> it. > >>>> > >>>> History, hell, you don't even seem to remember things that happened > >>>> more than a few *hours* ago. :P > >>> > >>> Why do libs ALWAYS accuse others of being the way they are? Are their > >>> little fantasy worlds so limited that they can't possibly imagine > >>> diversity? > >> > >> Your total failure to address any point Nadegda raised has been noted > >> and recorded. > > > > Since the pair of you socks > > Proof? > > > are only interested in personalities and fantasy and have no interest in > > science or actual facts > > Proof? > > > your remarks are irrelevant. > > Wrong. Proof? -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 23:18 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pctb7k$ci8$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #684418 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:29:00 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <pcsve5$ci8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: >> >> > your remarks are irrelevant. > >> Wrong. > > Proof? My remarks continue to make the Exxon $hills froth. So do kensi's. Therefore, they must be relevant, or why would the Exxon paymasters fear them so? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 19:05 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcte0r$pgp$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684440 |
On 5/8/2018 6:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:29:00 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pcsve5$ci8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> your remarks are irrelevant. >> >>> Wrong. >> >> Proof? > > My remarks continue to make the Exxon $hills froth. So do kensi's. > Therefore, they must be relevant, or why would the Exxon paymasters fear > them so? > your remarks are meaningless scribblings on an electronic wall. (if you really want to get paid to be a Climate Change $hill, or any other type of paid shill, just send $4.99 to makemerich@paypal.com, you will be surprised!)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 17:10 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8q3r0.l8p.17.6@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684448 |
. you mean she put it in her bum
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 19:22 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <cqf4fdt1es2pgk4fpk0chhts5jpb675jvr@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #684449 |
On Tue, 8 May 2018 17:10:39 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: >. > >you mean she put it in her bum I can only imagine she likes it that way.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 17:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b8q58r.cki.17.4@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #684453 |
On 2018-05-08 5:22 PM, Bricked wrote: > On Tue, 8 May 2018 17:10:39 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > >> . >> >> you mean she put it in her bum > > > I can only imagine she likes it that way. > come on , this has got to be fake news , no girl is going to allow that , any where near what she denies she has
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 07:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcukkm$gbt$4@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684448 |
On 5/8/2018 8:05 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 5/8/2018 6:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:29:00 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>> your remarks are irrelevant. >>>> Wrong. >>> Proof? >> >> My remarks continue to make the Exxon $hills froth. So do kensi's. >> Therefore, they must be relevant, or why would the Exxon paymasters fear >> them so? > > your remarks are meaningless scribblings on an electronic wall. Yeah, her remarks are so "meaningless" you feel the need to reply to every single one of them with an attack of some sort. You fear what she says an awful lot more than most people fear something "meaningless". -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 15:03 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pcvk7g$aob$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684528 |
On 5/9/2018 6:04 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/8/2018 8:05 PM, Sergio wrote: >> On 5/8/2018 6:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:29:00 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... >>>>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: >>>>>> your remarks are irrelevant. >>>>> Wrong. >>>> Proof? >>> >>> My remarks continue to make the Exxon $hills froth. So do kensi's. >>> Therefore, they must be relevant, or why would the Exxon paymasters fear >>> them so? >> >> your remarks are meaningless scribblings on an electronic wall. > > Yeah, her remarks are so "meaningless" you feel the need to reply to > every single one of them with an attack of some sort. You fear what she > says an awful lot more than most people fear something "meaningless". > jibberish
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 22:22 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <NXsIC.151233$RM2.74789@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #684440 |
On 5/8/2018 7:18 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:29:00 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <pcsve5$ci8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: >>> >>>> your remarks are irrelevant. >> >>> Wrong. >> >> Proof? > > My remarks continue to make the Exxon $hills froth. So do kensi's. > Therefore, they must be relevant, or why would the Exxon paymasters fear > them so? > It must really stick in your craw the way Exxon leadership pointed out that wind and solar is the stupidest idea ever as a way to keep civilization going. But you libs don't do science or quantity. I hope you know how to hitch and drive Oxen if your fantasy world ever comes to pass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-09 07:06 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <pcuknm$gbt$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #684490 |
On 5/8/2018 10:22 PM, benj wrote: > It must really stick in your craw the way Exxon leadership pointed out > that wind and solar is the stupidest idea ever as a way to keep > civilization going. No, anti-renewal propaganda from Big Oil was only to be expected. And of course it is futile in the long run. The short run now, since renewable energy has hit the knee of the adoption curve *and* the effectiveness curve and is busily proving itself out in the field. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-08 22:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.355c2922c3560acf993956@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #684440 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pctb7k$ci8$10@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 08 May 2018 14:29:00 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > > > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > > Checkmate! In article <pcsve5$ci8$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > > @gmail.invalid says... > > > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >> melt! > >> On Tue, 08 May 2018 15:08:43 -0400, benj wrote: > >> > >> > your remarks are irrelevant. > > > >> Wrong. > > > > Proof? > > My remarks continue to make the Exxon $hills froth. So do kensi's. > Therefore, they must be relevant, or why would the Exxon paymasters fear > them so? That's not "proof," it's conjecture based on classic erroneous presuppositions. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web