Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 251 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
"kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
" White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
"kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
"kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13 Next page →
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700 |
| Subject | BlueEyed Feminism. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.10--0.06pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #689874 |
"kensi"[sic] replied to "Avenging"[sic]: > > a Marxist utopia ? Yeah, no thanks. > > we prefer the Nordic social democracies like Finland and Sweden > over Soviet-style governance. Sure, BlueEyed Feminism; that's not racist/sexist. In "The Handmaid's Tale", Margaret Atwood is crying "foul"; " I'm good, the game is bad ", is the gist of it. She can't imagine a better game, one where everyone wants to play. Depressed losers "toss the table" disrupting the game. Right before Alek Minassian mowed down pedestrians, he wrote: The Incel Rebellion has begun ! We will overthrow the Chads and Stacys ! All hail the Supreme Gentleman, Elliot Rodger ! The " I know better than the market; every detail, always " concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pefmo9$ooj$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687404 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 27 May 2018 18:25:23 -0400, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2018 05:43:29 -0400, kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > > >>No, she changed it to the housing affordability crisis. All she's heard >>from you on that topic since then has been: >> >>*crickets* > > Do tell us, kensi, where in the U.S. Constitution it states citizens > have the right to affordable housing? > > Affordable medical care? A chicken in every pot? > A car in every garage? Free college education? Yes, except the car part. That would destroy the climate in short order. Good, efficient, cheap/free public transportation would be better. The remarkable thing is than conservatives can say, in essence, that some people should starve, or die of exposure or of easily treatable medical conditions, and not instantly be run out of town on a rail for being callous horrid awful excuses for "human beings" ... > You're a fucking communist - go live in a communist country, then, and > see how much you like it. That you don't live in a communist country > indicates you are a hypocrite and a liar. > > FOAD - you lying communist whore, scumbag teacher aka indoctrinator of > all things left. Your leftist ideas are downright creepy and lead only > to the destruction of a free society. You are warped, > tawdry and delusional. It would be nice if you suffered a stroke that > left you in a vegetative state. I would laugh. You really are a piece of shit, aren't you? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pefnlh$ooj$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687428 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 27 May 2018 19:53:16 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018 01:41:30 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sun, 27 May 2018 18:25:23 -0400, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 05:43:29 -0400, kensi >>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>No, she changed it to the housing affordability crisis. All she's >>>>heard from you on that topic since then has been: >>>> >>>>*crickets* >>> >>> Do tell us, kensi, where in the U.S. Constitution it states citizens >>> have the right to affordable housing? >>> >>> Affordable medical care? A chicken in every pot? >>> A car in every garage? Free college education? >> >>Yes, except the car part. That would destroy the climate in short order. >>Good, efficient, cheap/free public transportation would be better. > > So the constitution is ok as long as it suits you. ? >>The remarkable thing is than conservatives can say, in essence, that >>some people should starve, or die of exposure or of easily treatable >>medical conditions, and not instantly be run out of town on a rail for >>being callous horrid awful excuses for "human beings" ... > > Or get a job, Lots of people can't find work. Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living expenses, let alone leave them with any spending (or emergency rainy-day) cash after expenses. Try again, kooky? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687435 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 27 May 2018 21:12:14 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Mon, 28 May 2018 01:57:05 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Sun, 27 May 2018 19:53:16 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 01:41:30 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>melt! >>>>On Sun, 27 May 2018 18:25:23 -0400, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 27 May 2018 05:43:29 -0400, kensi >>>>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>No, she changed it to the housing affordability crisis. All she's >>>>>>heard from you on that topic since then has been: >>>>>> >>>>>>*crickets* >>>>> >>>>> Do tell us, kensi, where in the U.S. Constitution it states citizens >>>>> have the right to affordable housing? >>>>> >>>>> Affordable medical care? A chicken in every pot? >>>>> A car in every garage? Free college education? >>>> >>>>Yes, except the car part. That would destroy the climate in short >>>>order. >>>>Good, efficient, cheap/free public transportation would be better. >>> >>> So the constitution is ok as long as it suits you. >> >>? >> >>>>The remarkable thing is than conservatives can say, in essence, that >>>>some people should starve, or die of exposure or of easily treatable >>>>medical conditions, and not instantly be run out of town on a rail for >>>>being callous horrid awful excuses for "human beings" ... >>> >>> Or get a job, >> >>Lots of people can't find work. > > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work needing doing even as the population grows. >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living >>expenses, > > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should be? Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without additional income from one source or another -- and there is no upward ladder from most jobs. Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate about it. No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about it? -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.35763500ba03ee6b993b86@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #687458 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > >>Lots of people can't find work. > > > > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. > > Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work needing > doing even as the population grows. > > >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living > >>expenses, > > > > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. > > Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should be? > Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, get a > car and a starter house and also work your way up from that start at your > work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not even enough for > poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without additional income from > one source or another -- and there is no upward ladder from most jobs. > > Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate about it. > No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by > faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing that > happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about it? Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys we're all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's not "right" or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make it, some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human race will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever for its own good. I see no other outcome. -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <peif8c$ooj$22@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687566 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 > @gmail.invalid says... > > >> >>Lots of people can't find work. >> > >> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >> >> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work needing >> doing even as the population grows. >> >> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living >> >>expenses, >> > >> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >> >> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should be? >> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, >> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that start >> at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not even >> enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without additional >> income from one source or another -- and there is no upward ladder from >> most jobs. >> >> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate about >> it. >> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing that >> happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about it? > > Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. > Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to > find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys we're all > so addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's not "right" > or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this > technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If your > job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell or > repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our lives. > It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make it, some will > not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has quickened, and will > continue to do so. At some point, the human race will have managed to > destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever for its own good. I > see no other outcome. Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is sky- high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't have dared dream of such a big increase? Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <5shpgdpl53tpmoeutgunjag4heckravne5@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #687590 |
On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: > >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >> @gmail.invalid says... >> >> >>> >>Lots of people can't find work. >>> > >>> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>> >>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work needing >>> doing even as the population grows. >>> >>> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living >>> >>expenses, >>> > >>> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>> >>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should be? >>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, >>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that start >>> at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not even >>> enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without additional >>> income from one source or another -- and there is no upward ladder from >>> most jobs. >>> >>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate about >>> it. >>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing that >>> happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about it? >> >> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to >> find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys we're all >> so addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's not "right" >> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If your >> job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell or >> repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our lives. >> It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make it, some will >> not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has quickened, and will >> continue to do so. At some point, the human race will have managed to >> destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever for its own good. I >> see no other outcome. > >Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is sky- >high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't have >dared dream of such a big increase? > >Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. So everyone who works for themselves and their families can get fat as an alabama tick on your ass with America's abundance. So fuck you dumbshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <peiksm$ooj$29@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687596 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>> @gmail.invalid says... >>> >>> >>>> >>Lots of people can't find work. >>>> > >>>> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>> >>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>> >>>> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living >>>> >>expenses, >>>> > >>>> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>> >>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>> be? >>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, >>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>> >>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>> about it. >>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>> it? >>> >>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to >>> find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys we're >>> all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's not >>> "right" >>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell >>> or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our >>> lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make it, >>> some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human race >>> will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever >>> for its own good. I see no other outcome. >> >>Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>sky- >>high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>have dared dream of such a big increase? >> >>Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P > > You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if > you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal > products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of manual labor a week and making it so that food security is only for stockbrokers, doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than enough roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, yet huge echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee landlords sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking streets...). -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <xoaPC.123759$pg3.38923@fx29.iad> |
| In reply to | #687602 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/29/2018 12:28 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>> >>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>> >>>>>>> Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full living >>>>>>> expenses, >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>> >>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>>> be? >>>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor job, >>>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>>> >>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>>> about it. >>>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>>> it? >>>> >>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having to >>>> find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys we're >>>> all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. It's not >>>> "right" >>>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, sell >>>> or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of our >>>> lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make it, >>>> some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human race >>>> will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too clever >>>> for its own good. I see no other outcome. >>> >>> Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>> productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>> sky- >>> high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>> have dared dream of such a big increase? >>> >>> Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P >> >> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if >> you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal >> products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. > > I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for > pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of manual > labor a week and making it so that food security is only for stockbrokers, > doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than enough > roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, yet huge > echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee landlords sit > around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips of the casino > capitalists while people shiver in the fucking streets...). If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the "biggest shithole" prize!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pejg5u$15ub$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #687615 |
On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: > If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and give > it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the USSR, China > under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, Norway and on and > one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and efforts America still > trails the rest of the world and wins the "biggest shithole" prize! US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation-regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin-a7694726.html It's official: the United States is a Third World country https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the-united-states-is-a-third-world-country This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and ignore every other stakeholder in society. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pejh63$15ub$9@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #687621 |
On 5/29/2018 8:28 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >> >> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the-united-states-is-a-third-world-country >> >> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what happens >> when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and ignore >> every other stakeholder in society. > > univision.com? LOL So, what you're saying is you don't have any actual argument to offer. Gotcha. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <CIfPC.189624$LR2.111287@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #687629 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/29/2018 8:31 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/29/2018 8:28 AM, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >>> >>> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the-united-states-is-a-third-world-country >>> >>> >>> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >>> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what happens >>> when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and ignore >>> every other stakeholder in society. >> >> univision.com? LOL > > So, what you're saying is you don't have any actual argument to offer. > Gotcha. > You "got" nuttin'. I already smacked down your leftist professor whose "proof" was the ultra high approval rating Trump had after election! You libs really are smoking some good shit now that growing MJ is legal in a number of your states. Why would ANYONE listen to an anonymous liberal crank with no name, no address, no proof of ANY education whatsoever and an ego the size of all outdoors? Aren't there better ways to waste your time? Watch Star Trek reruns or something?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <UkfPC.162680$T14.110874@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #687621 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: > On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: > >> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >> "biggest shithole" prize! > > US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns > > https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation-regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin-a7694726.html > > > It's official: the United States is a Third World country > > https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the-united-states-is-a-third-world-country > > > This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in > infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what happens > when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and ignore > every other stakeholder in society. > So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful things like parks and picking up trash along the highways (which the "poor" people threw out of their car windows) can make America great. That is the problem is it not? You say the non-productive poor people who are living off the work of others are ALSO "stakeholders" in this country? I mean what could possibly go wrong with your plan? I love your lib idea of the "proof" of that now the U.S. ia "officially" a Third world country. Namely: "Here is the *evidence*. How many times have people in Latin America, in response to the troubles that their countries faced, said “we need a strong leader.” That is the solution for which many Americans cast their ballots on Election Day as they expressed their disgust with the dysfunctionality of Washington." "They assumed that someone like Donald Trump, who pretends to be a strong leader, is going to fix everything and make their lives better. And just like those in Latin America who have expressed similar sentiments over so many years, they could not be more wrong." Om other words the sole "proof" is based upon the drooling blather of Rocket Man Dennis Jett a former diplomat in Argentina and lefty professor. Yeah, he viewed first hand how leftist government quickly turned Latin America from shitholes with people walking to the U.S. to "find a better life" into worker utopias where now all Trump supporters are walking to South Amrerica to find jobs in the "socialist miracles" To show just how ignorant and dishonest the pair of you are just note his "proof" quote: "Usually in Latin America a new president enters office with sky-high approval ratings. Then as he proves incapable of changing much of anything, those ratings start to decline until he leaves office with his approval in the low teens, if not single digits. " So the "proof" the two of you have that America is "officially" Third World is Trump's dazzling approval rating? Bwhahahaha! Obviously all "evidence" only resides in your commie fantasies! Both of you morons need to go by the dispensary and have the nurz give you your meds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekccv$ooj$34@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687663 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:36:54 -0400, benj wrote: > Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that > Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. > > > On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: >> >>> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >>> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >>> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >>> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >>> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >>> "biggest shithole" prize! >> >> US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns >> >> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation- regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin- a7694726.html >> >> >> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >> >> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the- united-states-is-a-third-world-country >> >> >> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what >> happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and >> ignore every other stakeholder in society. > > So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing > money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful > things like parks and picking up trash along the highways No, *kensi*'s idea is to tax the *idle rich* to pay for the common good and to *subsidize* the productive people in society (that part by raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour). -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <bah21i.ndb.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #687703 |
On 2018-05-29 10:15 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:36:54 -0400, benj wrote: > >> Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that >> Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. >> >> >> On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: >>> >>>> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >>>> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >>>> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >>>> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >>>> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >>>> "biggest shithole" prize! >>> >>> US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns >>> >>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation- > regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin- > a7694726.html >>> >>> >>> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >>> >>> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the- > united-states-is-a-third-world-country >>> >>> >>> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >>> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what >>> happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and >>> ignore every other stakeholder in society. >> >> So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing >> money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful >> things like parks and picking up trash along the highways > > No, *kensi*'s idea is to tax the *idle rich* to pay for the common good > and to *subsidize* the productive people in society (that part by raising > the minimum wage to $15 an hour). > where i live that is the minimum wage
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <21mPC.119683$pK.109550@fx13.iad> |
| In reply to | #687703 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/29/2018 4:15 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Tue, 29 May 2018 12:36:54 -0400, benj wrote: > >> Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that >> Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. >> >> >> On 5/29/2018 8:13 AM, kensi wrote: >>> On 5/29/2018 6:59 AM, benj wrote: >>> >>>> If only we could just get some guns and take what the rich have and >>>> give it to the poor America could be a worker's paradise like the >>>> USSR, China under Mao, Cambodia under Pol Pot, Cuba, North Korea, >>>> Norway and on and one. In spite of Nads, undying dedication and >>>> efforts America still trails the rest of the world and wins the >>>> "biggest shithole" prize! >>> >>> US has regressed to developing nation status, MIT economist warns >>> >>> https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation- > regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin- > a7694726.html >>> >>> >>> It's official: the United States is a Third World country >>> >>> https://www.univision.com/univision-news/opinion/its-official-the- > united-states-is-a-third-world-country >>> >>> >>> This is what happens when there is insufficient public investment, in >>> infrastructure, in parks and cities, and in people. This is what >>> happens when governments bend over backwards on behalf of capital and >>> ignore every other stakeholder in society. >> >> So, "Kanzi" your idea is that only "public investment" meaning stealing >> money from the productive people in society and using it for wonderful >> things like parks and picking up trash along the highways > > No, *kensi*'s idea is to tax the *idle rich* to pay for the common good > and to *subsidize* the productive people in society (that part by raising > the minimum wage to $15 an hour). > What makes you think the rich are "idle"? Are you saying the your leftist gun-grabbing pals Soros and Bloomberg just got rich by sitting on their asses? That's not even true for Trump. You need to spend some time reading Ayn Rand to learn why your leftist philosophy is total bullshit.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pemlvp$rpc$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #687749 |
On 5/29/2018 8:13 PM, benj wrote: > What makes you think the rich are "idle"? They derive most of their wealth from passive income, rather than a salary earned by actually, you know, *working*. > Are you saying the your leftist gun-grabbing pals Soros and Bloomberg > just got rich by sitting on their asses? Yes. > That's not even true for Trump. The hell you say. He inherited most of what he has from Fred Trump, for fuck's sake. It doesn't get much more passive than that. And you can tell from his "physique", if I may use that term loosely, that he's never done any heavy lifting in his life. > You need to spend some time reading Ayn Rand to learn why your leftist > philosophy is total bullshit. It's funny you should say "Ayn Rand" and "bullshit" in the same sentence: http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/10/ayn-rands-philosophy-who-needs-it-is-bullshit/ -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <E0CPC.255493$ll2.35442@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #687815 |
Trigger warning: The following post may contain language and truth that Leftwing Libs may find emotionally negative and unpleasant. On 5/30/2018 1:11 PM, kensi wrote: > On 5/29/2018 8:13 PM, benj wrote: > >> What makes you think the rich are "idle"? > > They derive most of their wealth from passive income, rather than a > salary earned by actually, you know, *working*. So in your fantasy leftist "workers world" the only "income" permitted is by obeying the commands of someone else and groveling for whatever he deems to give you for your obedience. Now's there's the nice lefttist moron. >> Are you saying the your leftist gun-grabbing pals Soros and Bloomberg >> just got rich by sitting on their asses? > > Yes Ha! I'd love to see you as a Lib TRYING to run a big shipping enterprise or media conglomerate! There is nothing funnier than a bunch of yo lefty libs actually trying to do useful work. Fantasy does no better with the reality of work than it does with the reality of science. SNORT! I recall when a bunch of you libs near the university got together with the wondrous plan to start a food cooperative market. (we all know that communist ideals are the answer) The place as a pig sty and they nearly poisoned their customers until someone who actually knew some real knowledge pointed out that they were selling seed corn with fungicide one it colored day-glo because it's POISON! Duh. And you morons come here on the Internet as some anonymous voice that everyone is supposed to just believe just because you say it? You are all liars and fraudsters. >> That's not even true for Trump. > > The hell you say. He inherited most of what he has from Fred Trump, for > fuck's sake. It doesn't get much more passive than that. And you can > tell from his "physique", if I may use that term loosely, that he's > never done any heavy lifting in his life. Well it's obvious YOU have never done any "heavy lifting" with YOUR brain! And I'd bet your morbidly obese shape against trump's any day. Post a picture ms. secret voice and prove me wrong other wise shut the fuck up. Sure trump started with an inheritance. but given that he managed to go bankrupt more than once, it's clear he was able to get it all back. And now judging by the crooked Clinton's Post-white house, he's in line for a huge bunch of cash. Now THAT is getting money and doing nothing for it. Oh wait that's what you libs believe in, isn't it? Steal from the rich and give it out to those who you like? >> You need to spend some time reading Ayn Rand to learn why your leftist >> philosophy is total bullshit. > > It's funny you should say "Ayn Rand" and "bullshit" in the same sentence: > > http://bleedingheartlibertarians.com/2015/10/ayn-rands-philosophy-who-needs-it-is-bullshit/ Heh. I knew Rand would jerk your chain! You commies can't stand the thought of someone doing something to get rich without you stealing all that money because you "care". What a bunch of phonies. If ANYONE needs the oil fields turned back into the way they were before someone found them it's you. I sure hope you know how to drive an ox and cart, because that's just the kind of "green" transport you deserve.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700 |
| Subject | Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.30--1.04pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #687815 |
"kensi" wrote: > you can tell from Trump's "physique", > -- if I may use that term loosely -- > that he's never done any heavy lifting in his life. Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda must be proud. |
| Message-ID | <pekcen$ooj$35@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #687602 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Tue, 29 May 2018 05:57:12 -0600, Skeeter DoW #420 wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2018 04:28:06 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: > >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Mon, 28 May 2018 22:26:00 -0500, Bricked wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 29 May 2018 02:51:56 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda >>> <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>melt! >>>>On Mon, 28 May 2018 16:47:45 -0700, Checkmate wrote: >>>> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>> by Checkmate! In article <peg63n$ooj$21@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>Lots of people can't find work. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Bullshit, there are jobs everywhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit, automation is causing there to be less and less work >>>>>> needing doing even as the population grows. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>Lots more can't find work that will actually pay their full >>>>>> >>living expenses, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Maybe they ought to lower their standards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Who died and made you arbiter of what the standard of living should >>>>>> be? >>>>>> Time was you could get a foot on the ladder with a menial labor >>>>>> job, >>>>>> get a car and a starter house and also work your way up from that >>>>>> start at your work getting promoted. Now a menial labor job is not >>>>>> even enough for poverty-level subsistence -- you will DIE without >>>>>> additional income from one source or another -- and there is no >>>>>> upward ladder from most jobs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why do you not object to this change? There was no public debate >>>>>> about it. >>>>>> No referendum held. It was simply imposed on the American people by >>>>>> faceless bureaucrats in three-piece suits. It's the sort of thing >>>>>> that happened in the Soviet Union. Why aren't you roaring mad about >>>>>> it? >>>>> >>>>> Automation is just the natural progression of the industrial age. >>>>> Technology is constantly changing, and people are constantly having >>>>> to find ways to change with it. The complicated electronic toys >>>>> we're all so addicted to could not be built by any other means. >>>>> It's not "right" >>>>> or "wrong," it just is. What would you do... make laws to ban this >>>>> technology and watch the rest of the world blow right past us? If >>>>> your job gets replaced by a robot, learn how to design, install, >>>>> sell or repair robots. We're locked into change in every aspect of >>>>> our lives. It's a matter of adaptation and survival. Some will make >>>>> it, some will not. It's always been that way. Only the pace has >>>>> quickened, and will continue to do so. At some point, the human >>>>> race will have managed to destroy itself by being too greedy and too >>>>> clever for its own good. I see no other outcome. >>>> >>>>Why should anyone's *survival* be in doubt, in *this* day and age when >>>>productivity per capita, especially of basic necessities like food, is >>>>sky- >>>>high to the point our ancestors of even a century or two ago wouldn't >>>>have dared dream of such a big increase? >>>> >>>>Oh, that's right, so a few anointed-ones can live high off the hog. :P >>> >>> You are full of shit. Go to even the most basic grocery store and if >>> you avoid all the processed "foods" you can buy vegetable and animal >>> products that kings and queens would only dream about in ages past. >> >>I believe that's what I just said. Which means there's no excuse for >>pricing it out of the reach of people who "merely" work 40 hours of >>manual labor a week and making it so that food security is only for >>stockbrokers, >>doctors, and engineers. Same applies to shelter (there's more than >>enough roofed-over space to house the planet's population comfortably, >>yet huge echoing nearly-empty McMansions half of them with absentee >>landlords sit around being used merely as the huge immobile poker chips >>of the casino capitalists while people shiver in the fucking >>streets...). > > So others have stuff and you don't, that bothers you. I have stuff. More than average. But unlike some I am not blind to my privilege. I know darn well that lots of people lack the things I take for granted. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web