Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #674562 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-03-04 16:04 -0600 |
| Last post | 2018-03-06 16:41 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 212 — 13 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 16:04 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 14:41 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 23:32 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 16:36 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 15:16 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:03 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 16:17 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 08:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:03 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 09:14 -0800
No one would -dare- to compare James McGinn to others. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-05 09:24 -0800
Re: No one would -dare- to compare James McGinn to others. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 11:24 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:48 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:03 -0800
Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-05 09:12 -0800
Re: Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-05 16:16 -0600
Re: Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-05 18:18 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Ser gio <innvilid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-04 19:12 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 19:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 21:52 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-04 22:19 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 00:10 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 01:25 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 04:08 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:56 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 15:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 17:35 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 08:38 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:49 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:11 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 08:21 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 16:36 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 18:48 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 22:24 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 03:25 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 22:26 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 14:17 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 12:58 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 23:23 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 17:15 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 14:17 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-08 13:37 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-03-08 16:58 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-08 19:43 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 18:25 -0800
We don't live in the perfectly ordered world you're selling. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-08 13:27 -0800
Re: We don't live in the perfectly ordered world you're selling. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 16:50 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 20:48 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-07 10:11 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 00:42 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 01:44 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 06:23 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 09:29 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 11:36 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-08 14:16 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-08 19:40 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 20:24 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 08:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 17:53 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-08 14:17 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 17:32 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 20:08 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 11:23 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 12:41 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-09 14:59 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 15:29 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 19:12 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-10 23:35 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 06:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 10:56 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-11 18:30 -0500
Counterfeit testosterone, from China. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-03-11 18:10 -0700
Re: Counterfeit testosterone, from China. James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 18:52 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 10:57 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 15:28 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 16:27 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-03-09 20:27 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 07:08 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 08:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-12 11:32 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:30 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:23 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 22:11 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 15:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 15:58 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 11:01 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 12:25 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 14:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 16:16 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-15 10:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-15 11:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-15 18:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-15 21:25 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-15 19:48 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-15 21:57 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 08:55 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 08:52 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 09:37 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 11:18 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 13:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 14:27 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 15:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 00:45 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 13:28 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 07:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 11:48 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 19:53 +0000
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 13:26 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-19 13:31 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-19 15:46 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 15:27 -0700
Re: James McGinn is abusing "caffeine" ( or something like it ). James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 23:06 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 15:43 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 07:27 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-19 10:41 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 13:17 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 15:33 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 23:03 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 11:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 13:09 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 14:25 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 15:18 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 16:59 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-20 20:39 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 06:33 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 10:55 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 14:15 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 06:28 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-19 11:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 17:21 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:06 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 00:31 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 09:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 09:18 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 09:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 10:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 14:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 14:34 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-20 15:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-20 15:21 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-20 20:38 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 06:36 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 10:50 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:08 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:22 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-16 18:07 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 16:13 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 19:02 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-16 19:42 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-16 22:04 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 21:54 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-16 22:06 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-17 16:11 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:58 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 21:51 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:55 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-18 00:57 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-16 22:59 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-14 20:53 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 19:04 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-14 12:27 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 12:08 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 09:13 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 11:48 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-11 14:12 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 14:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-11 18:31 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 09:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:42 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 07:02 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-13 10:14 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 14:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-21 15:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-21 16:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-21 17:09 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 09:23 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 09:12 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 12:43 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 14:49 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 15:08 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-22 19:54 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-22 22:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 05:58 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 13:38 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 08:11 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-26 10:46 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-26 13:32 -0500
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-26 14:10 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 06:34 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 10:20 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-03-23 07:56 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-23 11:17 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-11 06:59 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 09:24 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 10:29 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Claudius Denk <claudiusdenk@gmail.com> - 2018-03-12 14:57 -0700
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 19:47 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 20:02 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-09 08:54 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 00:45 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-08 01:47 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-10 17:57 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-05 16:19 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 13:31 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:02 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 06:29 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 07:58 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-03-06 10:19 -0600
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-05 14:13 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 08:24 -0800
Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-03-06 16:41 -0800
Page 1 of 11 [1] 2 3 … 11 Next page →
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 16:04 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Goat boy, Pnal, Sergio, Ed Prochak, Bodkin, Paco (Frank): What is the number one reason each of you believes clear moist air contains gaseous H2O? |
| Message-ID | <9lqo9dhvn76n94fm2ms12nfdv26qdenkhf@4ax.com> |
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 16:18:41 -0700 (PDT), James McGinn wrote: >To be clear, that is moist air at the ambient temperatures/pressures found in Earth's atmosphere. > >I predict the following. None of you will be able to give a straight answer to this question and will instead employ one or more of the following tactics/strategies: > >1) Pretend you never have seen the question > >2) Pretend not to understand the question > >3) Attempt to obscure the issue by asking diversion questions > >4) Attempt to obscure the issue by calling me names > >5) Outright lies about evidence that you will never be able to find James, are you a fan of John Barth's? Good writer, if maybe a bit weird. Giles, Ebenezer Cooke, all good fun. I just stumbled across this ancient but evidently still active thread, so I thought I'd answer for myself: A dozen ways of detecting that pesky water vapor come to mind, but I won't go into them. It's easier than that. When air bearing water vapor comes into contact with something cold, the water vapor turns back into water. You can see it with the unaided eye. No complex, difficult-to-understand equipment required. The windshield of an air-conditioned car on a humid day, the outside of a glassful of an iced drink. Admit it: you've seen it happen. You made a mistake, and seem to think the loss of face from being dumb less painful than the loss of face from being wrong. That's weird. -- Lofty Goat / R L Watkins
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 14:41 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5ac2a53a-12be-48bf-97e7-e4d13ae3b953@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674562 |
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:04:26 PM UTC-8, Lofty Goat wrote: > When air bearing water vapor comes into contact with something cold, the > water vapor turns back into water. You can see it with the unaided eye. I've never disputed that water vapor can/will condense. My dispute is with the brain-dead assumption that the form of the water in clear moist air is gaseous. Gaseous H2O cannot exist at the low temperatures that are available in the atmosphere. Therefore the phase of the water in water vapor is liquid, not gas. Unfortunately the world is populated by a bunch of dumb SOBs who assume that since clear moist air is clear that, therefore, the form of the water therein must be gaseous. These retards have dismissed the possibility that it might be comprised of H2O nanodroplets that are so small as to be invisible. Why the fuck you retards have such a hard time comprehending this simple distinction is anybody's guess. > No complex, difficult-to-understand equipment required. If you can't decisively determine whether the molecules of H2O are multimolecular or monomolecular then what is the fucking point? > The windshield of an air-conditioned car on a humid day, the outside of > a glassful of an iced drink. Admit it: you've seen it happen. Everybody has seen this happen, you fucking mental retard. The problem, you stupid SOB, is that nobody has been able to verify that the moist air thereof contained monomolecular gas molecules of H2O or multimolecular nanodroplets of H2O. Please make a special effort to maintain this simple distinction so that I don't have to re-explain it to you fucking over and over again, you fucking imbecile.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 23:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p7hvmj$1oaf$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #674568 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:04:26 PM UTC-8, Lofty Goat wrote: > >> When air bearing water vapor comes into contact with something cold, the >> water vapor turns back into water. You can see it with the unaided eye. > > I've never disputed that water vapor can/will condense. My dispute is > with the brain-dead assumption that the form of the water in clear moist > air is gaseous. Gaseous H2O cannot exist at the low temperatures that > are available in the atmosphere. Therefore the phase of the water in > water vapor is liquid, not gas. Unfortunately the world is populated by a > bunch of dumb SOBs who assume that since clear moist air is clear that, > therefore, the form of the water therein must be gaseous. These retards > have dismissed the possibility that it might be comprised of H2O > nanodroplets that are so small as to be invisible. > > Why the fuck you retards have such a hard time comprehending this simple > distinction is anybody's guess. > >> No complex, difficult-to-understand equipment required. > > If you can't decisively determine whether the molecules of H2O are > multimolecular or monomolecular then what is the fucking point? Done long ago. Dispersion rates depend strongly on mass. It is very easy to measure the dispersion of water and see that the measured rates are only compatible with monomolecular water. Do catch up. > >> The windshield of an air-conditioned car on a humid day, the outside of >> a glassful of an iced drink. Admit it: you've seen it happen. > > Everybody has seen this happen, you fucking mental retard. The problem, > you stupid SOB, is that nobody has been able to verify that the moist air > thereof contained monomolecular gas molecules of H2O or multimolecular nanodroplets of H2O. > > Please make a special effort to maintain this simple distinction so that > I don't have to re-explain it to you fucking over and over again, you fucking imbecile. > -- Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 16:36 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <f925665a-3f71-4209-8ced-bca4943c16f7@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674580 |
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 3:32:41 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > If you can't decisively determine whether the molecules of H2O are > > multimolecular or monomolecular then what is the fucking point? > > Done long ago. How long ago? Was it before the invention of writing. > Dispersion rates depend strongly on mass. Meaningless. > It is very easy to > measure the dispersion of water and see that the measured rates are only > compatible with monomolecular water. Like you have a clue, fucking liar. > Do catch up. I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. You got nothing!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 15:16 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p7jmvu$eb4$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #674599 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 3:32:41 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> If you can't decisively determine whether the molecules of H2O are >>> multimolecular or monomolecular then what is the fucking point? >> >> Done long ago. > > How long ago? Was it before the invention of writing. > >> Dispersion rates depend strongly on mass. > > Meaningless. I don’t think so. It’s a well established empirical law that is fully accounted for in kinetic theory. Graham’s law notes that the rate of dispersion is proportional to the square root of the mass of the particles dispersing. The mathematical expression is simple: R1/R2 = sqrt(M2/M1) Which immediately leads to a simple expression for finding a particle’s mass from measured dispersion rates: M2 = M1*(R1/R2)^2 This has been experimentally verified with literally hundreds of pairwise combinations, like N2 and O2, sulfur dioxide and argon, xenon and neon, carbon tetrachloride and ethanol. This was the basis for uranium 235 enrichment by diffusion during WWII. What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters is the mass of the diffusing thing. Applying the second formula for any — I repeat, any — mix of water and another gas, allows you to fix the mass of the water particles by knowing the mass of the gas atoms/molecules and measuring the relative dispersion rates. The answer comes out to be 18 g/mole. This is in experimental support for the water being monomolecular and starkly counter to your hypothesis of water microdroplets. > >> It is very easy to >> measure the dispersion of water and see that the measured rates are only >> compatible with monomolecular water. > > Like you have a clue, fucking liar. > >> Do catch up. > > I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. Data, not imagination. I know the above is wasted on you, because you are mentally ill. But facts are facts, regardless of the fantasy world you have constructed. > > You got nothing!!! > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 08:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <1ea3a8f4-494c-41c2-b797-a7f84ab06083@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674684 |
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 7:16:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the > particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters > is the mass of the diffusing thing. This is more than interesting, it's downright miraculous! Praise the lord!!! Provide a reference for this miraculous declaration, you lying son of a bitch. Put up or shut up, cocksucker.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 16:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p7jqic$l3r$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #674686 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 7:16:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the >> particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters >> is the mass of the diffusing thing. > > This is more than interesting, it's downright miraculous! And a simple fact from the 19th century. > > Praise the lord!!! > > Provide a reference for this miraculous declaration, you lying son of a bitch. I see. So not only are you uneducated on the basics of fluid behavior, but you are incapable of lifting a finger to look something up to help correct your ignorance. I’ll remind you of your status, Jim. You are the one that is uneducated and ignorant. No one owes you an education or to correct your ignorance, even if you cheep loudly like a helpless, featherless baby bird. You are completely incapable of reading or even moving a mouse to click a button, and you expect others to do that for you. Why, I don’t know. You dare people to try to convince you of simple things, and you think somehow it is a victory to resist being convinced of simple things. No one — I repeat, no one — will care that you will continue to be helpless, ignorant, and mentally ill. > > Put up or shut up, cocksucker. > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 08:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <9b5e8dcc-58c6-401c-97c0-015f165fefea@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674693 |
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 8:17:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 7:16:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > >> What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the > >> particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters > >> is the mass of the diffusing thing. > > > > This is more than interesting, it's downright miraculous! > > And a simple fact from the 19th century. LOL. So, according you Bodkin people in the 19th century didn't know the difference between a solid, liquid, and a gas. Uh, er . . . uh? > > Praise the lord!!! > > > > Provide a reference for this miraculous declaration, you lying son of a bitch. > > I see. So not only are you uneducated on the basics of fluid behavior, but > you are incapable of lifting a finger to look something up to help correct > your ignorance. YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > I’ll remind you of your status, Jim. > You are the one that is uneducated and ignorant. YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > No one owes you an education or to correct your ignorance, even if you > cheep loudly like a helpless, featherless baby bird. YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > You are completely incapable of reading or even moving a mouse to click a > button, and you expect others to do that for you. Why, I don’t know. YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > You dare people to try to convince you of simple things, and you think > somehow it is a victory to resist being convinced of simple things. YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > No one — I repeat, no one — will care that you will continue to be > helpless, ignorant, and mentally ill. YOU GOT NOTHING!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 17:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <p7jt95$qcl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #674696 |
James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 8:17:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 7:16:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>> >>>> What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the >>>> particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters >>>> is the mass of the diffusing thing. >>> >>> This is more than interesting, it's downright miraculous! >> >> And a simple fact from the 19th century. > > LOL. So, according you Bodkin people in the 19th century didn't know the > difference between a solid, liquid, and a gas. > > Uh, er . . . uh? > >>> Praise the lord!!! >>> >>> Provide a reference for this miraculous declaration, you lying son of a bitch. >> >> I see. So not only are you uneducated on the basics of fluid behavior, but >> you are incapable of lifting a finger to look something up to help correct >> your ignorance. > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > >> I’ll remind you of your status, Jim. > >> You are the one that is uneducated and ignorant. > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > >> No one owes you an education or to correct your ignorance, even if you >> cheep loudly like a helpless, featherless baby bird. > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > >> You are completely incapable of reading or even moving a mouse to click a >> button, and you expect others to do that for you. Why, I don’t know. > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > >> You dare people to try to convince you of simple things, and you think >> somehow it is a victory to resist being convinced of simple things. > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > >> No one — I repeat, no one — will care that you will continue to be >> helpless, ignorant, and mentally ill. > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > Isn’t it funny how your overworked phrase sounds so much like the cheep of a helpless, featherless baby bird? -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 09:14 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <a6518501-6b2b-48e6-a23b-d74b40251fe8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674699 |
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 9:03:39 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 8:17:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 7:16:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > >>> > >>>> What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the > >>>> particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters > >>>> is the mass of the diffusing thing. > >>> > >>> This is more than interesting, it's downright miraculous! > >> > >> And a simple fact from the 19th century. > > > > LOL. So, according you Bodkin people in the 19th century didn't know the > > difference between a solid, liquid, and a gas. > > > > Uh, er . . . uh? > > > >>> Praise the lord!!! > >>> > >>> Provide a reference for this miraculous declaration, you lying son of a bitch. > >> > >> I see. So not only are you uneducated on the basics of fluid behavior, but > >> you are incapable of lifting a finger to look something up to help correct > >> your ignorance. > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > >> I’ll remind you of your status, Jim. > > > >> You are the one that is uneducated and ignorant. > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > >> No one owes you an education or to correct your ignorance, even if you > >> cheep loudly like a helpless, featherless baby bird. > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > >> You are completely incapable of reading or even moving a mouse to click a > >> button, and you expect others to do that for you. Why, I don’t know. > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > >> You dare people to try to convince you of simple things, and you think > >> somehow it is a victory to resist being convinced of simple things. > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > >> No one — I repeat, no one — will care that you will continue to be > >> helpless, ignorant, and mentally ill. > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > > > > Isn’t it funny how your overworked phrase sounds so much like the cheep of > a helpless, featherless baby bird? > > -- > Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables Quack quack
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 09:24 -0800 |
| Subject | No one would -dare- to compare James McGinn to others. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.5--9.24am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #674699 |
> > > No one owes you an education or to correct your ignorance, > > > even if you cheep loudly like a helpless, featherless baby bird. > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > Isn’t it funny how your overworked phrase sounds so much like > the cheep of a helpless, featherless baby bird? He wants us to feed his ego, as if he were so damn smart that no one would -dare- to compare him to others.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 11:24 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: No one would -dare- to compare James McGinn to others. |
| Message-ID | <18f11028-1e64-4c84-9e0c-838a0c1050e6@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674725 |
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 9:24:35 AM UTC-8, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > > > > No one owes you an education or to correct your ignorance, > > > > even if you cheep loudly like a helpless, featherless baby bird. > > > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > > > > YOU GOT NOTHING!!! > > > > Isn’t it funny how your overworked phrase sounds so much like > > the cheep of a helpless, featherless baby bird? > > He wants us to feed his ego, > as if he were so damn smart that > no one would -dare- to compare him to others. Jeff, Why don't you go defrag your hard drive or reinstall windows or something. Also, every once in a while you should comb the crumbs out of your beard. And would it kill you to take a shower? I mean, come on.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 13:48 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <ee4c9b8c-c084-4f67-80be-a4da39bd2726@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674686 |
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 11:03:33 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote: > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 7:16:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the > > particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters > > is the mass of the diffusing thing. > > This is more than interesting, it's downright miraculous! > > Praise the lord!!! > > Provide a reference for this miraculous declaration, you lying son of a bitch. > > Put up or shut up, cocksucker. Pick up your high school chemistry book. Oh I forgot, you didn't graduate from there either. Ed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 14:03 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <312fabc0-59c8-472a-be43-560c43ad1486@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674772 |
On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 1:48:56 PM UTC-8, Edward Prochak wrote: > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 11:03:33 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote: > > On Monday, March 5, 2018 at 7:16:21 AM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote: > > > > > What’s interesting about this law is that it doesn’t matter whether the > > > particle is an atom, a molecule, or a clump of molecules. All that matters > > > is the mass of the diffusing thing. > > > > This is more than interesting, it's downright miraculous! > > > > Praise the lord!!! > > > > Provide a reference for this miraculous declaration, you lying son of a bitch. > > > > Put up or shut up, cocksucker. > > Pick up your high school chemistry book. > Oh I forgot, you didn't graduate from there either. > > Ed You got nothing!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 09:12 -0800 |
| Subject | Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.5--9.12am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #674684 |
> > I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. > > Data, not imagination. I know the above is wasted on you, > because you are mentally ill. But facts are facts, > regardless of the fantasy world you have constructed. Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd, someone has to do it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 16:16 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. |
| Message-ID | <p7kfj4$1r8i$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #674704 |
On 3/5/2018 11:12 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. >> >> Data, not imagination. I know the above is wasted on you, >> because you are mentally ill. But facts are facts, >> regardless of the fantasy world you have constructed. > > Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd, someone has to do it. > Short Bus has very thick screens on the windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-05 18:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd. |
| Message-ID | <0gknC.99441$s_2.33201@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #674786 |
On 3/5/2018 5:16 PM, Sergio wrote: > On 3/5/2018 11:12 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>>> I wouldn't pretend to compete with your imagination. >>> >>> Data, not imagination. I know the above is wasted on you, >>> because you are mentally ill. But facts are facts, >>> regardless of the fantasy world you have constructed. >> >> Thanks for driving the short bus, Mr. Odd, someone has to do it. >> > > Short Bus has very thick screens on the windows. > Reminds me of a true story: There used to be this old lady neighbor I had whose grass I'd mow. One day she's telling me how she was old enough she didn't have to pay her electric bill! What?? Then I talk to other old ladies in neighborhood and they are all mad saying she got the city to pay her electric bill but they all knew she had hundreds of thousands of dollars in the bank! And then some time later I'm walking by and what do I see but the little old lady coming out of her house with a big strapping "attendant" in white outfits on each arm. They walked her to a short bus. Put her in and drove off! I never saw her again! In a short time some lawyers had offices in what used to be her house! Moral of story: Free stuff from government not as free as you think. So if you have the money, pay your bills or you may get a quick trip on the short bus or worse, like Bert have to drive your old van to Kalifornia where everyone is nuts (liberals) and nobody cares how much you steal from the government.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ser gio <innvilid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 19:12 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <p7i5ho$1vni$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #674580 |
On 3/4/2018 5:32 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:04:26 PM UTC-8, Lofty Goat wrote: >> >>> When air bearing water vapor comes into contact with something cold, the >>> water vapor turns back into water. You can see it with the unaided eye. >> >> I've never disputed that water vapor can/will condense. My dispute is >> with the brain-dead assumption that the form of the water in clear moist >> air is gaseous. Gaseous H2O cannot exist at the low temperatures that >> are available in the atmosphere. Therefore the phase of the water in >> water vapor is liquid, not gas. Unfortunately the world is populated by a >> bunch of dumb SOBs who assume that since clear moist air is clear that, >> therefore, the form of the water therein must be gaseous. These retards >> have dismissed the possibility that it might be comprised of H2O >> nanodroplets that are so small as to be invisible. >> >> Why the fuck you retards have such a hard time comprehending this simple >> distinction is anybody's guess. >> >>> No complex, difficult-to-understand equipment required. >> >> If you can't decisively determine whether the molecules of H2O are >> multimolecular or monomolecular then what is the fucking point? > > Done long ago. Dispersion rates depend strongly on mass. It is very easy to > measure the dispersion of water and see that the measured rates are only > compatible with monomolecular water. Do catch up. > >> >>> The windshield of an air-conditioned car on a humid day, the outside of >>> a glassful of an iced drink. Admit it: you've seen it happen. >> >> Everybody has seen this happen, you fucking mental retard. The problem, >> you stupid SOB, is that nobody has been able to verify that the moist air >> thereof contained monomolecular gas molecules of H2O or multimolecular nanodroplets of H2O. >> >> Please make a special effort to maintain this simple distinction so that >> I don't have to re-explain it to you fucking over and over again, you fucking imbecile. >> > > > no need to swear McGinn, your words are stored forever on google servers for all to see that you really are a moron, and on youtube too. How is your best buddy DraftScience ?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve BH <sbharris@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 19:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d749edba-2b2b-4995-96be-357f1c57e86c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674580 |
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 3:32:41 PM UTC-8, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 2:04:26 PM UTC-8, Lofty Goat wrote:
> >
> >> When air bearing water vapor comes into contact with something cold, the
> >> water vapor turns back into water. You can see it with the unaided eye.
> >
> > I've never disputed that water vapor can/will condense. My dispute is
> > with the brain-dead assumption that the form of the water in clear moist
> > air is gaseous. Gaseous H2O cannot exist at the low temperatures that
> > are available in the atmosphere. Therefore the phase of the water in
> > water vapor is liquid, not gas. Unfortunately the world is populated by a
> > bunch of dumb SOBs who assume that since clear moist air is clear that,
> > therefore, the form of the water therein must be gaseous. These retards
> > have dismissed the possibility that it might be comprised of H2O
> > nanodroplets that are so small as to be invisible.
> >
> > Why the fuck you retards have such a hard time comprehending this simple
> > distinction is anybody's guess.
> >
> >> No complex, difficult-to-understand equipment required.
> >
> > If you can't decisively determine whether the molecules of H2O are
> > multimolecular or monomolecular then what is the fucking point?
>
> Done long ago. Dispersion rates depend strongly on mass. It is very easy to
> measure the dispersion of water and see that the measured rates are only
> compatible with monomolecular water. Do catch up.
>
> >
> >> The windshield of an air-conditioned car on a humid day, the outside of
> >> a glassful of an iced drink. Admit it: you've seen it happen.
> >
> > Everybody has seen this happen, you fucking mental retard. The problem,
> > you stupid SOB, is that nobody has been able to verify that the moist air
> > thereof contained monomolecular gas molecules of H2O or multimolecular nanodroplets of H2O.
> >
> > Please make a special effort to maintain this simple distinction so that
> > I don't have to re-explain it to you fucking over and over again, you fucking imbecile.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Nevermind dispersion rates. The simple partial pressure for an ideal gas (which small partial pressure gases obey), tells you what the gas "particles" are made of. It is simply
PV = nRT.
V/n = RT/P.
The value of V/n is 22.4 L/mole at 273 K at 1 atm. For partial pressure less than 1 atm, the equation is just as predictive. The molar volume at a partial pressure of 0.1 atm is 224 L.
So if we want to know if helium exists as single atom molecules, we weigh it. At 273 K and 1 atm, 22.4 L of helium weighs 4 grams (neglect buoyancy). So it's clearly single atoms. If you do that for oxygen, though, you get 32 grams, or two moles O per molar gas volume. So oxygen gas is O2. Do it for ozone and you get 48 grams.
The technique was used to find out about the molecules of gases in mixes before mass spectroscopy came along. Do it for chlorine and you find 22.4 L contains 71 grams, so it's evidently Cl2.
What about water, which is liquid at room temp? It has a vapor pressure, however, and it is the same in air as in vacuum, so obviously the same species are present in both cases. The vapor pressure at 37 C (body temp) is 47 Torr or 0.0618 atm. The density of this gas in vacuum is 44 grams per cubic meter (1000 L). This is also the water content of saturated air at 37 C (of course).
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Kinetic/watvap.html
Thus for 44 grams H2O we have n mols = PV/RT = .0618 atm (1000 liter)/[310 K* 0.0821 L*atm/mol*K] = 2.40 mol particles = 44 grams. So 1 mole = 44/2.40 = 18.3 g.
Why not exactly 18 g per mole particles? Because wups, we are seeing non-ideal behavior this close to 0 C, and a compressibility Z = 1.02. At temperatures of about 95 C the compressiblity goes to 1.0 and molar mass from PV/RT decreases to 18.0 grams.
In any case, 18.2 grams per ideal molar gas volume is quite large enough to show that water gas at 37 C doesn't go around even as dimer molecules, and certainly not droplets! Such behavior would give us calculations with the ideal gas equation of >>> 18 grams per mol of H20 gas, not 18.3.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-03-04 21:52 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <d98409fd-8c15-4f52-84ab-5494058bf52e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #674634 |
On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 7:53:22 PM UTC-8, Steve BH wrote: > Nevermind dispersion rates. Everybody knows Bodkin talks out of his A-hole. The simple partial pressure for an ideal gas (which small partial pressure gases obey), tells you what the gas "particles" are made of. It is simply > > PV = nRT. > > V/n = RT/P. > > The value of V/n is 22.4 L/mole at 273 K at 1 atm. For partial pressure less than 1 atm, the equation is just as predictive. The molar volume at a partial pressure of 0.1 atm is 224 L. > > So if we want to know if helium exists as single atom molecules, we weigh it. At 273 K and 1 atm, 22.4 L of helium weighs 4 grams (neglect buoyancy). So it's clearly single atoms. If you do that for oxygen, though, you get 32 grams, or two moles O per molar gas volume. So oxygen gas is O2. Do it for ozone and you get 48 grams. Thanks for the review, but FYI, I'm an atmospheric physicist. > The technique was used to find out about the molecules of gases in mixes before mass spectroscopy came along. Do it for chlorine and you find 22.4 L contains 71 grams, so it's evidently Cl2. > > What about water, which is liquid at room temp? It has a vapor pressure, however, Right. It has a vapor pressure. Not a gas pressure. A vapor pressure. Vapor is liquid. and it is the same in air as in vacuum, No. At that temperature in a vacuum H2O is gaseous. Consult a H2O phase diagram. so obviously the same species are present in both cases. This is neither true nor obvious.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 11 [1] 2 3 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web