Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #729962 > unrolled thread

At the BB Infinite Time Infinite Space Infinite Gravity Was Needed

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  At the BB Infinite Time Infinite Space  Infinite Gravity Was Needed "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 12:16 -0800
    Entropy is eternal. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-02 18:27 -0800
      Re: Entropy is eternal. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-02 21:40 -0500
        Your world will end. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2019-03-03 01:45 -0800
          Re: Your world will end. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 11:17 -0500

#729962 — At the BB Infinite Time Infinite Space Infinite Gravity Was Needed

Then when the universe was created it slowed to c for magnetic waves.Particles could get to 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 of c but going this close to c made them very creative.Bert

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#730026 — Entropy is eternal.

Entropy is eternal; 
The Known Universe is going infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730028 — Re: Entropy is eternal.

On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 18:27:46 -0800 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:

>Entropy is eternal; 
>The Known Universe is going infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse.

Your assumption is based upon faulty premises.

1) arrow of time goes only one way - into the future; this has not yet been proven

2) you don't know if there is enough dark matter to reverse the expansion

3) you don't believe God who says, "world without end".

Open your mind to ALL the possibilities. Don't be an entropy chauvinist.

-- 

Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730060 — Your world will end.

Greg to me:
> > Entropy is eternal; The Known Universe is going 
> > from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse.
> 
> 1) the arrow of time goes only one way - into the future ?
>    no, this has not yet been proven

"Cause and effect" ( the four dimensional time-scape ) 
is most certainly static, immutable, eternal;
even if we can't fully prove it, nothing refutes it.

Our ignorance is not proof that "God" (nature) is random.

> 2) you don't know if there is enough dark matter
>    to reverse the expansion

"dark energy" is entropy; 
"dark matter" is hyper-cold, unseen, degenerate mass.

  12.5 billion years ago, quasar J2157-3602 had the power of 
  695 trillion suns  ( 2.66×10^41 Watts );  in comparison, 
  the most luminous hypernovae (ASASSN-15lh) peaked at 572 billion suns.

  The Known Universe had less entropy 12.5 billion years ago,
  hence the greater luminosity/power/Watts.

> 3) you don't believe God who says, "world without end".

Your world will end.

> Open your mind to ALL the possibilities.
> Don't be an entropy chauvinist.

You should try to understand today's physics first,
before attempting to (SLIGHTLY) improve on it.
You think you know better than Einstein, you don't.

Every SnakeOil salesman denies entropy,
and Greg is no exception.

Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington wrote: ＜＜

    If someone points out to you that
    your pet theory of the universe is
    in disagreement with Maxwell's equations --
    then, so much the worse for Maxwell's equations.
    
    If it is found to be contradicted by observers --
    well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes.
    
    But, if your theory is found to be
    against the second law of thermodynamics,
    I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but
    to collapse in deepest humiliation.  ＞＞

    -- From "The Nature of the Physical World", 1915, chapter 4.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#730088 — Re: Your world will end.

On Sun, 03 Mar 2019, Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>Greg to me:
>> > Entropy is eternal; The Known Universe is going 
>> > from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse.
>> 
>> 1) the arrow of time goes only one way - into the future ?
>>    no, this has not yet been proven
>
>"Cause and effect" ( the four dimensional time-scape ) 
>is most certainly static, immutable, eternal;
>even if we can't fully prove it, nothing refutes it.
>
>Our ignorance is not proof that "God" (nature) is random.

You readily admit ignorance yet you blindly believe in
certain "laws of physics".  Not very enlightened of 
you, Jeff.

>> 2) you don't know if there is enough dark matter
>>    to reverse the expansion
>
>"dark energy" is entropy; 
>"dark matter" is hyper-cold, unseen, degenerate mass.

Nope, dark matter is called dark matter because it
can be shown to be *there* and has mass but is 
otherwise unknown.

>  12.5 billion years ago, quasar J2157-3602 had the power of 
>  695 trillion suns  ( 2.66×10^41 Watts );  in comparison, 
>  the most luminous hypernovae (ASASSN-15lh) peaked at 572 billion suns.
>
>  The Known Universe had less entropy 12.5 billion years ago,
>  hence the greater luminosity/power/Watts.

Less entropy back then, sure.  I'll bite but it then
logically follows that it had more entropy *potential*
to balance the equation.  

>> 3) you don't believe God who says, "world without end".
>
>Your world will end.

My world is the universe in which I exist. Should I fail
to exist then, yes, my world will end. But, that isn't
God's meaning. God has placed corporal bodies very
low on his list and this, in a way, verifies His and
His universe being infinite in time and matter.

>> Open your mind to ALL the possibilities.
>> Don't be an entropy chauvinist.
>
>You should try to understand today's physics first,
>before attempting to (SLIGHTLY) improve on it.
>You think you know better than Einstein, you don't.

Einstein is your false god. His guesses are no proof.

>Every SnakeOil salesman denies entropy,
>and Greg is no exception.

Entropy is denied the minute you stop blindly accepting
an ever-expanding universe. A universe that stops 
expanding and falls back in on itself will increase in
entropy. 

>Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington wrote: ??
>
>    If someone points out to you that
>    your pet theory of the universe is
>    in disagreement with Maxwell's equations --
>    then, so much the worse for Maxwell's equations.
>    
>    If it is found to be contradicted by observers --
>    well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes.
>    
>    But, if your theory is found to be
>    against the second law of thermodynamics,
>    I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but
>    to collapse in deepest humiliation.  ??
>
>    -- From "The Nature of the Physical World", 1915, chapter 4.

False prophets everywhere. 

-- 

Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, 
Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web