Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #729181 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-02-26 05:01 +0200 |
| Last post | 2019-03-06 00:25 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 267 — 27 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-26 05:01 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-25 22:43 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 04:22 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 06:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 10:08 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:23 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:14 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 11:31 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:22 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 12:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:52 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 14:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Agent 007" <007@who.cares> - 2019-02-26 17:08 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 20:22 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:21 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 08:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 08:47 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 12:29 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:17 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:21 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-02-26 13:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 14:10 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-26 18:12 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 14:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2019-02-27 13:31 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-26 11:32 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-26 11:42 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 10:42 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:30 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 13:57 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:00 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 18:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-27 05:29 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-26 20:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 21:09 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 00:46 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-02-26 23:49 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 22:33 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 08:22 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:17 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-28 00:07 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 23:09 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-28 10:11 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 08:04 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 06:46 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 01:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-01 11:30 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 09:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 12:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 10:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:38 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 16:26 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 14:32 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-01 17:45 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-02 03:55 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 23:53 -0800
The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-02 19:24 -0800
Re: The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages. SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-02 22:26 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 12:37 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-01 10:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-02 05:47 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-02 00:18 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 06:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 10:11 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 20:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:01 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 15:57 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 23:53 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 19:43 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:50 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 19:56 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 05:49 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 10:40 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 10:01 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 12:11 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 09:28 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 12:36 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 10:46 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 20:28 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:31 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 17:58 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 21:12 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:27 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 21:51 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 20:27 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-04 15:53 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-05 06:04 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 22:20 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 10:09 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 00:00 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 05:29 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> - 2019-03-04 14:34 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 00:04 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Just Wondering <JW@jw.com> - 2019-03-05 03:08 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-05 07:18 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-04 15:31 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 15:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-04 10:34 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 14:55 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 17:08 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:14 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 17:23 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:28 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 10:33 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 11:38 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:17 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 20:10 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 13:26 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 16:41 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 16:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 16:03 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 15:19 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 23:59 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-03 19:49 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:54 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:51 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 17:35 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 15:38 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 18:08 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-03-03 18:33 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 17:16 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-03-04 01:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 18:12 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-03 23:55 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 20:11 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 04:28 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 22:46 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 09:21 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 23:29 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 20:29 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 13:33 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 18:00 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-05 06:06 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-04 22:19 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-05 21:37 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 17:24 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-05 22:41 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-03-05 18:06 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 15:38 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-05 22:11 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-06 05:18 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 23:03 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 15:18 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 13:22 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-03-06 15:15 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-05 15:36 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-03-03 14:57 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-03 22:59 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson_invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-03 15:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-03-04 00:01 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 18:45 -0700
People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-03-02 18:58 -0800
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-03 06:50 +0200
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-03 12:35 +0000
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-03-03 09:15 -0700
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-04 05:55 +0200
Re: People prefer warm Bangladesh over cold Norway. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-03 12:33 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 11:25 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-27 11:30 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:50 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:05 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-02-27 13:31 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:39 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:37 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:40 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:49 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:51 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 11:58 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:02 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:55 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:05 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 18:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:35 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:44 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:07 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-02-27 19:21 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:26 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 13:44 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 11:52 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 14:05 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:13 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 12:35 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-27 14:38 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:25 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2019-02-27 22:12 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 23:10 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 12:39 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:27 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:31 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 17:43 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 17:48 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:03 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 18:59 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:24 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:36 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 19:41 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 19:43 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 20:04 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:06 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 16:54 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:09 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 17:16 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:05 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 14:22 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:43 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 16:21 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-27 16:32 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 01:46 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 01:50 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 14:22 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 06:42 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 15:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 07:32 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-02-28 15:41 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfreude@null.net> - 2019-02-28 07:53 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-28 05:20 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:27 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:51 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 21:13 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-28 16:16 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:47 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 14:20 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:44 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 14:24 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-02-28 23:15 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2019-03-01 00:55 -0800
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 01:57 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-02-28 09:35 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 10:14 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 11:11 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2019-02-28 23:04 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-28 16:17 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-02-28 05:17 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-02-27 20:26 -0700
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-02-28 10:13 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-03-01 06:48 +0200
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 09:46 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 10:21 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 13:28 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Serg Io <invvalid@invalid.com> - 2019-02-26 13:53 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-02-26 18:09 -0500
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-03-01 13:09 +0000
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-03-02 22:27 -0600
Re: Trump border emergency is fake and climate crisis is real jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2019-03-06 00:25 +0000
Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14 Next page →
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 14:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c18tut.e4f.17.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #729822 |
On 2019-03-01 2:26 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: > On 3/1/2019 3:38 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q5bp6a$13p3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>> On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>> posts by >>>>> Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>> On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 >>>>>>> percent >>>>>>> of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >>>>>> >>>>>> Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >>>>> >>>>> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't >>>>> prove >>>>> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. >>>>> 0.04% is >>>>> doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >>>>> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the >>>>> climate >>>>> today is nearly the same as it was back then. >>>>> >>>>> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, >>>>> volcanism, rock >>>>> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >>>>> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >>>>> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there >>>>> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively >>>>> stable. >>>>> >>>>>> That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of >>>>>> what it >>>>>> was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >>>>> >>>>> Bullshit. >>>> >>>> Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact >>>> that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature >>>> rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. >>>> >>>> These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first >>>> the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a >>>> temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet >>>> they persist in their folly. >>>> >>>> So very stupid of them. >>> >>> Stupid oceans wouldn't let the CO2 rise up until they got warm. Rat >>> bastard oceans. F**k the oceans. Trump should sign an executive order >>> outlawing oceans because they flood golf courses, too, and reduce >>> property values which makes it difficult to get multi-billion dollar >>> loans to buy National Football teams to honor the troops, and the flag, >>> and The President, who represents America, without inflating (hugely), >>> which is illegal, and has consequences for tax liability deflating. >> >> *burp-fart* > > It's all in the molar attenuation coefficient, re-emission and collision > energy transfer, and heat capacity due to the specific eigenmodes > available to the system. > > Remember, chill the diet coke before you pop it open. > if you were shorter would you vote for trump
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 17:45 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5cclq$1u6c$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729825 |
On 3/1/2019 4:32 PM, % wrote: > On 2019-03-01 2:26 p.m., mixed nuts wrote: >> On 3/1/2019 3:38 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <q5bp6a$13p3$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie says... >>>> On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate >>>>> <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>>> kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>>>> On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>>> Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or >>>>>>>> 4 percent of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >>>>>> >>>>>> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't >>>>>> prove the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. >>>>>> 0.04% is doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >>>>>> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the >>>>>> climate today is nearly the same as it was back then. >>>>>> >>>>>> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, >>>>>> volcanism, rock >>>>>> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >>>>>> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >>>>>> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, >>>>>> there are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively >>>>>> stable. >>>>>> >>>>>>> That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of >>>>>>> what it was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >>>>>> >>>>>> Bullshit. >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact >>>>> that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature >>>>> rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. >>>>> >>>>> These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first >>>>> the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a >>>>> temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet >>>>> they persist in their folly. >>>>> >>>>> So very stupid of them. >>>> >>>> Stupid oceans wouldn't let the CO2 rise up until they got warm. Rat >>>> bastard oceans. F**k the oceans. Trump should sign an executive order >>>> outlawing oceans because they flood golf courses, too, and reduce >>>> property values which makes it difficult to get multi-billion dollar >>>> loans to buy National Football teams to honor the troops, and the flag, >>>> and The President, who represents America, without inflating (hugely), >>>> which is illegal, and has consequences for tax liability deflating. >>> >>> *burp-fart* >> >> It's all in the molar attenuation coefficient, re-emission and >> collision energy transfer, and heat capacity due to the specific >> eigenmodes available to the system. >> >> Remember, chill the diet coke before you pop it open. >> > if you were shorter would you vote for trump I wouldn't even hold the door open for him. -- Grizzly H.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 05:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5cue7$9e6$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729842 |
On 3/1/2019 5:45 PM, mixed nuts wrote: > On 3/1/2019 4:32 PM, % wrote: >> if you were shorter would you vote for trump > > I wouldn't even hold the door open for him. I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 03:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q5curq$4tf$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #729886 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 05:48:22 +0200, kensi wrote: > On 3/1/2019 5:45 PM, mixed nuts wrote: >> On 3/1/2019 4:32 PM, % wrote: >>> if you were shorter would you vote for trump >> >> I wouldn't even hold the door open for him. > > I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire. I wouldn't set fire to him if he was freezing to death. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 23:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e3d66c52b4ec09996774@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729886 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q5cue7$9e6$2@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 3/1/2019 5:45 PM, mixed nuts wrote: ¤ > On 3/1/2019 4:32 PM, % wrote: ¤ >> if you were shorter would you vote for trump ¤ > ¤ > I wouldn't even hold the door open for him. ¤ ¤ I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire. That's because you'd have to squat on him and you'd get burned. If you were on fire, wouldn't you want the benefits of my hose? -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2019 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 19:24 -0800 |
| Subject | The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Mar.2--7.24pm.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #729886 |
Kensi: > I wouldn't piss on Trump if he was on fire. Trump got elected because he was more interesting. The Democrats have no idea what kind of precedents they are setting; soon, every member of Congress will have their tax records, and sexual peccadilloes, investigated/exposed. The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 22:26 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages. |
| Message-ID | <q5fl2a$7i3$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730032 |
On 3/2/2019 9:24 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Kensi: >> I wouldn't piss on Trump if he was on fire. > > Trump got elected because he was more interesting. > > The Democrats have no idea what kind of precedents they are setting; > soon, every member of Congress will have their tax records, > and sexual peccadilloes, investigated/exposed. ....all they way back to when they were in high school. TERM LIMITS NOW ! > > The only thing women like more than fake boobs is fake marriages. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 12:37 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q5bqlg$1b0d$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729768 |
On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote: >> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >> Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> ¤ On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >> ¤ > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent >> ¤ > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >> ¤ >> ¤ Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >> >> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove >> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is >> doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the climate >> today is nearly the same as it was back then. >> >> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, rock >> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there >> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. >> >> ¤ That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of what it >> ¤ was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >> >> Bullshit. > > Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact > that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature > rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. > > These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first > the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a > temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet > they persist in their folly. > > So very stupid of them. > Worse than that. from 1940 t0 1970 CO2 kept going UP while global temperatures were coming down! Dear non-science people note that radiative forcing by CO2 is an IMMEDIATE effect this clearly shows no causality between warming temperature and CO2 increases. To say so is a journo non-science lie.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-01 10:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <gdt9uaF6d9rU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #729775 |
On 3/1/19 10:37 AM, benj wrote: > On 3/1/2019 11:30 AM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> On Fri, 1 Mar 2019 01:10:58 -0800, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>> Checkmate! In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> kkensington01>@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> ¤ On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: >>> ¤ > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 >>> percent >>> ¤ > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." >>> ¤ >>> ¤ Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. >>> >>> That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove >>> the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is >>> doodley squat. Even if you could prove it, you couldn't dial it back >>> down to pre-industrial age levels anyway, and I'm pretty sure the >>> climate >>> today is nearly the same as it was back then. >>> >>> There are numerous cyclic activities involving sun spots, volcanism, >>> rock >>> erosion, orbits, and the Earth's tilt and wobble that all have the >>> potential to alter climate. You have far too many things that you >>> irrationally get all riled up over. As I've pointed out before, there >>> are natural mechanisms in place that keep CO2 levels relatively stable. >>> >>> ¤ That's almost a 50% increase, not "3 or 4 percent". It's 10/7 of >>> what it >>> ¤ was. 30% of what's in the air now was put there by humans. >>> >>> Bullshit. >> >> Indeed. And, the warmingtards STILL ignore the fact >> that ice core samples prove the FIRST the temperature >> rise FOLLOWED by atmospheric CO2 levels rising. >> >> These idiot warmingtards continue to claim that first >> the atmospheric levels of CO2 rise followed by a >> temperature rise. They have it just backwards yet >> they persist in their folly. >> >> So very stupid of them. >> > Worse than that. from 1940 t0 1970 CO2 kept going UP while global > temperatures were coming down! Cite. > Dear non-science people note that > radiative forcing by CO2 is an IMMEDIATE effect this clearly shows no > causality between warming temperature and CO2 increases. To say so is a > journo non-science lie. Amazing how you know more than the scientific community. Please publish! -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 05:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729744 |
On 3/1/2019 4:10 AM, Checkmate wrote: > In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... > ¤ On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: > ¤ > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent > ¤ > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." > ¤ > ¤ Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. > > That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove > the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is > doodley squat. It's 30%. 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our burning of fossil fuels. 30%. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-02 00:18 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36e3dc3ecbec0700996780@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #729885 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 @gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ ¤ On 3/1/2019 4:10 AM, Checkmate wrote: ¤ > In article <q5adf8$o9j$3@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... ¤ > ¤ On 2/27/2019 11:17 PM, Checkmate wrote: ¤ > ¤ > Did you catch this part? "some estimates say as little as 3 or 4 percent ¤ > ¤ > of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is due to humans." ¤ > ¤ ¤ > ¤ Nonsense. It went up from 280ppm preindustrial to north of 400 now. ¤ > ¤ > That doesn't prove it's due to the Industrial Age, and it doesn't prove ¤ > the methodology used to come up with that conclusion is sound. 0.04% is ¤ > doodley squat. ¤ ¤ It's 30%. ¤ ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our burning of ¤ fossil fuels. ¤ ¤ 30%. Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, doodley fucking squat. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2019 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 06:48 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5fmav$bhn$3@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #729909 |
On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by > Checkmate! In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01 > @gmail.nospam.invalid says... > ¤ It's 30%. > ¤ > ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our burning of > ¤ fossil fuels. > ¤ > ¤ 30%. > > Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. > You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene-last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, Miami Beach, Hong Kong ......... -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 10:11 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4ern7ep0buijce9ib87iuthp7f005ansen@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #730039 |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >> In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >> ¤ It's 30%. >> ¤ >> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our burning of >> ¤ fossil fuels. >> ¤ >> ¤ 30%. >> >> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? > >The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. > >> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> > >https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene-last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ > >If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, Miami >Beach, Hong Kong ......... People can move, you fool. Always have; always will. Why do you warmingtards INSIST on a static world? You seem so frightened of change. That is the sign of a small mind. We real human beings welcome the challenges that change brings. Environmental pressures only serve to make us stronger. You stupid socialist can remain weak and insecure while we conservatives continue to thrive. Away with you dregs. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 20:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q5hc9d$4tf$27@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #730081 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:11:23 -0500, Stinky Ggugglgz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist gguggled: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>> In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>> ¤ It's 30%. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >>> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >>> ¤ >>> ¤ 30%. >>> >>> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? >> >> The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. >> >>> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> >> >> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene- last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ >> >> If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >> means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, Miami >> Beach, Hong Kong ......... > > People can move, you fool. Always have; always will. Why do you > warmingtards INSIST on a static world? You seem so frightened of change. > That is the sign of a small mind. > > We real human beings welcome the challenges that change brings. > Environmental pressures only serve to make us stronger. You stupid > socialist can remain weak and insecure while we conservatives continue > to thrive. Away with you dregs. B-but ... the billionaires will lose zillions of dollars worth of investments in coastal real-estate and other assets. And you're fine with that? What kind of conservative *are* you if you're willing to throw billionaires and their very very important super important investments under the bus for your political agenda?? <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 16:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <10go7epcbar9eu1avk7kbqpefltk0ln35d@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #730141 |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:09:17 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:11:23 -0500, Stinky Ggugglgz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist gguggled: >> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>> On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>> In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>> ¤ It's 30%. >>>> ¤ >>>> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >>>> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >>>> ¤ >>>> ¤ 30%. >>>> >>>> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? >>> >>> The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. >>> >>>> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> >>> >>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene- >last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ >>> >>> If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >>> means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, Miami >>> Beach, Hong Kong ......... >> >> People can move, you fool. Always have; always will. Why do you >> warmingtards INSIST on a static world? You seem so frightened of change. >> That is the sign of a small mind. >> >> We real human beings welcome the challenges that change brings. >> Environmental pressures only serve to make us stronger. You stupid >> socialist can remain weak and insecure while we conservatives continue >> to thrive. Away with you dregs. > >B-but ... the billionaires will lose zillions of dollars worth of >investments in coastal real-estate and other assets. And you're fine with >that? What kind of conservative *are* you if you're willing to throw >billionaires and their very very important super important investments >under the bus for your political agenda?? > ><snicker> Investors won't lose squat. They will simple relocate and develop elsewhere. They have insurance for their losses elsewhere should sea level rise actually occur at the ridiculous amounts you warmingtards claim. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SergIo <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 15:57 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <q5hiks$nis$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #730149 |
On 3/3/2019 3:01 PM, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:09:17 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:11:23 -0500, Stinky Ggugglgz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist gguggled: >>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> ¤ It's 30%. >>>>> ¤ >>>>> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >>>>> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >>>>> ¤ >>>>> ¤ 30%. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? >>>> >>>> The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. >>>> >>>>> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> >>>> >>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in-pliocene- >> last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ >>>> >>>> If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >>>> means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, Miami >>>> Beach, Hong Kong ......... >>> >>> People can move, you fool. Always have; always will. Why do you >>> warmingtards INSIST on a static world? You seem so frightened of change. >>> That is the sign of a small mind. >>> >>> We real human beings welcome the challenges that change brings. >>> Environmental pressures only serve to make us stronger. You stupid >>> socialist can remain weak and insecure while we conservatives continue >>> to thrive. Away with you dregs. >> >> B-but ... the billionaires will lose zillions of dollars worth of >> investments in coastal real-estate and other assets. And you're fine with >> that? What kind of conservative *are* you if you're willing to throw >> billionaires and their very very important super important investments >> under the bus for your political agenda?? >> >> <snicker> > > Investors won't lose squat. They will simple relocate and develop > elsewhere. They have insurance for their losses elsewhere should > sea level rise actually occur at the ridiculous amounts you > warmingtards claim. > in any case, those areas can be sold to immigrants, who are currently flooding into the city of New Orleans.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 23:53 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q5hpd8$rt1$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #730149 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 16:01:12 -0500, Stinky Ggugglgz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist gguggled: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:09:17 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >>On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:11:23 -0500, Stinky Ggugglgz Hell, Fleabitten >>Nazi Rapist gguggled: >>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>> On 3/2/2019 3:18 AM, Checkmate wrote: >>>>> In article <q5cucd$9e6$1@gioia.aioe.org>, >>>>> kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid says... >>>>> ¤ It's 30%. >>>>> ¤ >>>>> ¤ 30% of the CO2 in this planet's atmosphere was emitted by our >>>>> burning of ¤ fossil fuels. >>>>> ¤ >>>>> ¤ 30%. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe, maybe not... who really knows? >>>> >>>> The scientists who measure these things know. And now you do too. >>>> >>>>> You're talking about 30% of 0.04%, or 0.012%. IOW, <SPANK> >>>> >>>> https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-free-arctic-in- pliocene- >>last-time-co2-levels-above-400ppm/ >>>> >>>> If the levels remain this high for very long (a century or less) that >>>> means bye-bye Greenland Ice Sheet. And bye-bye Manhattan, London, >>>> Miami Beach, Hong Kong ......... >>> >>> People can move, you fool. Always have; always will. Why do you >>> warmingtards INSIST on a static world? You seem so frightened of >>> change. >>> That is the sign of a small mind. >>> >>> We real human beings welcome the challenges that change brings. >>> Environmental pressures only serve to make us stronger. You stupid >>> socialist can remain weak and insecure while we conservatives continue >>> to thrive. Away with you dregs. >> >>B-but ... the billionaires will lose zillions of dollars worth of >>investments in coastal real-estate and other assets. And you're fine >>with that? What kind of conservative *are* you if you're willing to >>throw billionaires and their very very important super important >>investments under the bus for your political agenda?? >> >><snicker> > > Investors won't lose squat. They will simple relocate and develop > elsewhere. Wrong. They will either sell it or take a loss (or both, if the price has dropped). If they sell it, another billionaire will be left holding the bag. As the property in question loses value, rapidly or gradually, that value evaporates from one or more .01%ers' portfolios. > They have insurance for their losses elsewhere should sea level rise > actually occur at the ridiculous amounts you warmingtards claim. Insurance companies are owned by more billionaires. If they find themselves paying out a lot of claims, that's more billionaires that will be having a sad. Won't you think of the poor billionaires? <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 19:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <huso7et09h2fkc2v1es27v9nnc7of044uj@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #730195 |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 23:53:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 16:01:12 -0500, Stinky Ggugglgz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist gguggled: >> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:09:17 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <...> >>>B-but ... the billionaires will lose zillions of dollars worth of >>>investments in coastal real-estate and other assets. And you're fine >>>with that? What kind of conservative *are* you if you're willing to >>>throw billionaires and their very very important super important >>>investments under the bus for your political agenda?? >>> >>><snicker> >> >> Investors won't lose squat. They will simple relocate and develop >> elsewhere. > >Wrong. They will either sell it or take a loss (or both, if the price has >dropped). If they sell it, another billionaire will be left holding the >bag. As the property in question loses value, rapidly or gradually, that >value evaporates from one or more .01%ers' portfolios. > >> They have insurance for their losses elsewhere should sea level rise >> actually occur at the ridiculous amounts you warmingtards claim. > >Insurance companies are owned by more billionaires. If they find >themselves paying out a lot of claims, that's more billionaires that will >be having a sad. > >Won't you think of the poor billionaires? What you socialist/communists can't seem to grasp is when you live by the sword, you die by the sword. Capitalism is a dog-eat-dog system where those with abilities thrive and where those who attempt to leech of the abilities of others starve. That is the real world. That is life. You socialists/communists don't want real life. You want unworkable fairy tales where you are the king or the queen being worshipped by all for simply being - not doing. That is at the core of your dumbass liberal beliefs. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 17:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c1ei91.9rd.17.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #730205 |
On 2019-03-03 5:43 p.m., Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: > On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 23:53:12 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >> On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 16:01:12 -0500, Stinky Ggugglgz Hell, Fleabitten Nazi Rapist gguggled: >>> On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:09:17 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda > <...> > >>>> B-but ... the billionaires will lose zillions of dollars worth of >>>> investments in coastal real-estate and other assets. And you're fine >>>> with that? What kind of conservative *are* you if you're willing to >>>> throw billionaires and their very very important super important >>>> investments under the bus for your political agenda?? >>>> >>>> <snicker> >>> >>> Investors won't lose squat. They will simple relocate and develop >>> elsewhere. >> >> Wrong. They will either sell it or take a loss (or both, if the price has >> dropped). If they sell it, another billionaire will be left holding the >> bag. As the property in question loses value, rapidly or gradually, that >> value evaporates from one or more .01%ers' portfolios. >> >>> They have insurance for their losses elsewhere should sea level rise >>> actually occur at the ridiculous amounts you warmingtards claim. >> >> Insurance companies are owned by more billionaires. If they find >> themselves paying out a lot of claims, that's more billionaires that will >> be having a sad. >> >> Won't you think of the poor billionaires? > > What you socialist/communists can't seem to grasp is > when you live by the sword, you die by the sword. > Capitalism is a dog-eat-dog system where those with > abilities thrive and where those who attempt to leech > of the abilities of others starve. > > That is the real world. That is life. You socialists/communists > don't want real life. You want unworkable fairy tales where > you are the king or the queen being worshipped by all for > simply being - not doing. That is at the core of your dumbass > liberal beliefs. > a moose sleeps on my front lawn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-03-03 19:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4sto7e51bft9jo1rgmlf38126680nra1tp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #730209 |
On Sun, 3 Mar 2019 17:50:06 -0700, % <persent@gmail.com> wrote: <...> >a moose sleeps on my front lawn Well then, you should at least provide a warm bed in which the woman with whom you live may sleep. -- Everybødy here likes Yøurs Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bømbastic Løudmøuth øf the Søuth
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 14 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 14 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web