Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #687163 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 251 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-26 05:03 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:30 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 19:59 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 16:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 22:24 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-26 23:35 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 18:46 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 20:57 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:35 +0200
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:05 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:29 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:26 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:33 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom) - 2018-05-27 12:08 +0100
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:41 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:15 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:46 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:48 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:28 -0500
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:38 -0700
Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 01:37 +0000
Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-26 18:54 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2018-05-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 04:36 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:07 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:11 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 03:15 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 22:19 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:32 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:51 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:16 +0000
Nadegda must be proud. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 00:44 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:43 -0400
"kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-27 02:49 -0700
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-27 06:38 -0400
Re: "kensi" should addition for "Shameless", the TV show. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:29 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 17:16 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:08 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:08 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Dinsdale <yup@ayup.yup> - 2018-05-29 21:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 19:43 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-06-07 07:00 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:06 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-10 09:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-10 13:07 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:43 -0700
BlueEyed Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-10 12:06 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:41 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 06:03 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 16:47 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:51 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 22:26 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 04:28 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:59 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:31 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 13:02 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:36 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:15 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:17 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:13 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:25 -0400
Body Shaming ? I smell a feminist. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:04 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:16 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:18 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 20:17 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:16 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 14:52 -0400
" White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 13:27 -0700
Re: " White men and Asians " aren't leaving. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:48 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:15 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:17 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:19 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:31 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 13:35 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-29 17:11 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:33 -0400
Why does this concern you, exactly ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-30 14:43 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:41 -0400
Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:12 -0700
Re: Feminists may arm themselves against White males and Asians, but they'll lose. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:03 -0700
Re: Why does this concern you, exactly ? Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 20:14 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
"kensi" is not smarter than the market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700
Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400
"kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400
You know fuck all, trust me. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500
India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400
The job market. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400
Re: The job market. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:05 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-02 19:54 -0700
Re: The job market. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 20:31 +0000
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 14:16 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:04 +0100
Re: The job market. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 15:08 -0700
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 23:11 +0100
Re: The job market. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-04 01:35 -0700
Re: The job market. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-06-04 09:01 -0400
Re: The job market. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:34 -0400
Re: The job market. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:07 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-01 19:27 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 20:21 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:12 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:41 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:52 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:32 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-06-03 15:23 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:22 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-03 13:26 -0700
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-03 21:32 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-06-01 19:53 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:09 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:28 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-06-04 13:29 +0100
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-06-01 09:44 -0500
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:14 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:47 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:02 +0000
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 19:58 -0400
Re: You know fuck all, trust me. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-03 00:07 +0000
Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-01 13:35 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:49 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:43 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:19 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:08 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:52 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:18 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-05-27 11:33 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:42 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:57 +0000
Re: Nadegda must be proud. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:38 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:30 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:12 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 19:40 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 18:38 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:09 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 01:56 -0700
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 22:20 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-28 21:24 -0500
Re: Nadegda must be proud. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 19:29 +0200
Re: Nadegda must be proud. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-05-28 23:25 -0400
Re: Nadegda must be proud. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:52 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-05-27 12:10 +0100
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:13 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-27 11:26 -0500
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 13:04 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 23:18 +0200
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 11:02 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:30 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 20:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:39 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:33 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 06:50 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 00:53 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-09 01:48 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 19:14 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 11:44 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-06-07 23:43 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 07:28 -0700
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 11:57 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-08 05:38 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-08 02:26 -0400
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-10 12:00 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-11 02:47 +0000
Re: Fort Smith, Arkansas is much cheaper... and very Republican. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-06-10 19:50 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 20:55 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 23:30 -0500
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-27 05:18 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-27 03:41 -0700
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:18 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:32 -0400
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:55 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-28 01:43 +0000
Re: Michael Rotondo's "baby mama" is off the radar. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-28 17:10 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-05-31 19:34 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 04:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 11:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-02 13:54 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 16:37 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-02 21:05 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-02 20:08 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-03 10:59 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-06 01:38 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-06-06 03:49 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-06 06:44 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-06-06 16:18 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2018-06-07 10:53 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-06-07 07:58 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-05-26 14:05 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 18:25 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 10:39 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-28 13:38 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 14:46 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 15:16 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:22 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:56 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:22 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 13:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 05:52 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 02:57 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 06:55 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 12:50 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-29 13:24 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-05-29 20:23 +0000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-29 19:40 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-06-04 19:33 +1000
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-06-05 00:20 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-05-29 23:34 -0400
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-06-08 14:25 -0700
Re: Study claims climate change is having a 'devastating' effect on the nutrition of rice "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-06-08 15:09 -0700
Page 6 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 13 Next page →
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-05-31 05:47 -0700 |
| Subject | "kensi" is not smarter than the market. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.31--5.47am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #687931 |
"kensi" replied: > > > counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/ > > > > Then you take 2 or look for something else...ya maroon. > > the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/ > due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it. You're not smarter than the market.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 05:25 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "kensi" is not smarter than the market. |
| Message-ID | <per3el$21o$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #687938 |
On 5/31/2018 8:47 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > "kensi" replied: >>>> counterpunch.org/2017/07/11/jobs-you-cant-afford-to-take/ >>> >>> Then you take 2 or look for something else...ya maroon. >> >> the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/ >> due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it. > > You're not smarter than the market. The fuck's that supposed to mean, k0Oky? -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 05:42 -0700 |
| Subject | "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--5.42am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #688074 |
"kensi" replied:
> > > the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/
> > > due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it.
> >
> > You're not smarter than the (job) market.
>
> The fuck's that supposed to mean, k0Oky?
It's a (job) market.
Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 09:48 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: "kensi" thinks she's some kind of AllKnowing God, |
| Message-ID | <perirv$v96$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #688081 |
On 6/1/2018 8:42 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" replied:
>>>> the job described at the link actually has /net negative pay/
>>>> due to the costs it will incur for the sucker who signs up for it.
>>>
>>> You're not smarter than the (job) market.
>>
>> The fuck's that supposed to mean, k0Oky?
>
> It's a (job) market.
> Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>
> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
> so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 07:01 -0700 |
| Subject | You know fuck all, trust me. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--7.01am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #688093 |
"kensi" replied:
> > It's a (job) market.
> > Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
> >
> > You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
> > so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>
> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
You know fuck all, trust me.
You're just arrogant, patronizing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 10:36 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: You know fuck all, trust me. |
| Message-ID | <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #688094 |
On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> "kensi" replied:
>>> It's a (job) market.
>>> Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>
>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God,
>>> so damn smart that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>
>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>
> You know fuck all, trust me.
That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
> You're just arrogant, patronizing.
I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your
position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.)
I win.
*snicker*
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 09:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: You know fuck all, trust me. |
| Message-ID | <3sGdnVmUeYhEwYzGnZ2dnUU7-S_NnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #688097 |
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
<kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>"kensi" replied:
>>>>It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>>You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>You know fuck all, trust me.
>
>That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about one narrow field of study and can barely function in the world, otherwise.
i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and learn as a human, if i were you.
>>You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>
>I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your
>position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.)
>
>I win.
>
>*snicker*
you're talking like a conservative now?
--
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB6B8jGSdLA
"Thanks to muzzies and their apologist-enablers like puppy whistle, this
seems to be the new norm in the world. It's spreading like a cancer,
and it's time we admit we're at war with pure evil. We need to put an
end to this muzzie plague, or life on Earth is going to become pure hell
everywhere. We need to get these people out of every civilized
country, and there's only one way to do it. IOW, we have to become
like them, with an emphasis on expediency over cruelty." - Checkmate (of alt.checkmate)
"Pussy Willow has just proven that Trump's crackdown on previously
unenforced immigration policies is working. We'll deal with the domestic
terrorists as needed, but we don't need to be letting the muzzie
terrorists get a foothold in our country too. One need only look at what
they're doing in Europe right now to know we're doing the right thing by
keeping them out, which is our right and our duty. - Checkmate (#1 pussy willow fan)
-
"You just made puppy whistle's sig line longer." - Janithor
-
"If I have a complaint about the (Southern Poverty) Law Center's description (of the alt-right movement), it is the phrase "heavy use of social media," which implies the alt-right is a real-world movement which uses a lot of social media. This is backwards: it is an online movement which occasionally appears in the real world. Where it gets punched." - Jason Rhode
-
"I think we should destroy every last fucking mosque in America." - "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> proves for us that white males are violent in Message-ID: <MPG.32c5bfefd18c9a698f0a8@news.altopia.com>
-
Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 08:42 -0700 |
| Subject | India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--8.42am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #688102 |
Mr. "Your" [sic] replied to Ms. "kensi" [sic]: > > > You ( "kensi" [sic] ) know fuck all about the job market. > > > You're just arrogant, patronizing. > > > > I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your > > position. ( Which you never did state clearly, by the way. ) > > I win. *snicker* > > you're talking like a conservative now? This whole " I know better than the market; every detail, always. " concept is what's wrong with feminists and communists. Democratic India has sofware; Communist China has hardware. India digs porn; China can't see most of the Internet. Amazon and MicroSoft, in Seattle, aren't hardware vendors.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 09:41 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: You know fuck all, trust me. |
| Message-ID | <persvh$nd1$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #688102 |
On 6/1/2018 7:48 AM, Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder
Emeritus 🐶笛 wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
> of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
> in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>> that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>>
>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>
> oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about one narrow field of study and can barely function in the world, otherwise.
>
> i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and learn as a human, if i were you.
>
>>> You're just arrogant, patronizing.
>>
>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your
>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.)
>>
>> I win.
>>
>> *snicker*
>
> you're talking like a conservative now?
FNPWH = 1
Kensipaul = 0
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 19:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: You know fuck all, trust me. |
| Message-ID | <pesmee$d91$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688102 |
"Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus🐶笛"
<root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:3sGdnVmUeYhEwYzGnZ2dnUU7-S_NnZ2d@giganews.com...
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
> of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
> in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>
>>On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>"kensi" replied:
>>>>>It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job, some do.
>>>>>You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>>that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>You know fuck all, trust me.
>>
>>That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>
> oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about one
> narrow field of study and can barely function in the world, otherwise.
>
> i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and learn
> as a human, if i were you.
I would just note that we apparently haven't hit kensi's narrow field of
study yet.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 20:22 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: You know fuck all, trust me. |
| Message-ID | <LrlQC.267397$LR2.228290@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #688177 |
On 6/1/2018 7:28 PM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus🐶笛"
> <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
> news:3sGdnVmUeYhEwYzGnZ2dnUU7-S_NnZ2d@giganews.com...
>> On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 10:36:54 -0400, LO AND BEHOLD; "kensi
>> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid>" determined that the following was
>> of great importance and subsequently decided to freely share it with us
>> in <perlm8$14jj$1@gioia.aioe.org>:
>>
>>> On 6/1/2018 10:01 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> "kensi" replied:
>>>>>> It's a (job) market. Even if _most_ people don't want the job,
>>>>>> some do.
>>>>>> You ("kensi") think you're some kind of AllKnowing God, so damn smart
>>>>>> that none of the rest of us should be allowed to think.
>>>>> No, I just know scams and ripoffs when I see them.
>>>> You know fuck all, trust me.
>>>
>>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ...
>>
>> oh, i've met some ph.d's... there are plenty who know everything about
>> one narrow field of study and can barely function in the world,
>> otherwise.
>>
>> i wouldn't let your Ph.D. get in the way of continuing to grow and
>> learn as a human, if i were you.
>
>
> I would just note that we apparently haven't hit kensi's narrow field of
> study yet.
>
>
I'm guessing it's the "physics of journalism".
"ASStrophysics" ...get it?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-01 08:18 -0700 |
| Subject | The job market. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jun.1--8.18am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #688097 |
> > You ( "kensi" [sic] ) know fuck all ( about the job market ). > > That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ... That doesn't mean you know every minute detail of everyone in the job market, all the time ! ! ! > > You're just arrogant, patronizing. > > I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your > position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) > I win. *snicker* You lost, big time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 04:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <pet5cd$bad$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688110 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >> > You ( "kensi" [sic] ) know fuck all ( about the job market ). >> >> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ... > > That doesn't mean you know every minute detail of everyone in the job > market, all the time ! ! ! > >> > You're just arrogant, patronizing. >> >> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your >> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) >> I win. *snicker* > > You lost, big time. You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi won. -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 11:29 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <NJyQC.303961$br4.55183@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #688224 |
On 6/2/2018 12:10 AM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>>> You ( "kensi" [sic] ) know fuck all ( about the job market ). >>> >>> That's not what the faculty thought when they granted me my Ph.D. ... >> >> That doesn't mean you know every minute detail of everyone in the job >> market, all the time ! ! ! >> >>>> You're just arrogant, patronizing. >>> >>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your >>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) >>> I win. *snicker* >> >> You lost, big time. > > You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi won. > That means you are in middle school! Name your school, loon!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 13:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <peulc4$1raq$5@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #688281 |
On 6/2/2018 11:29 AM, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 12:10 AM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>> kensi >>>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your >>>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) >>>> I win. *snicker* >>> >>> You lost, big time. >> >> You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi won. > > That means you are in middle school! Name your school, loon! Non sequitur. -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade in here." ~Checkmate
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 16:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <56DQC.130748$np1.14352@fx06.iad> |
| In reply to | #688302 |
On 6/2/2018 1:49 PM, kensi wrote: > On 6/2/2018 11:29 AM, benj wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 12:10 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>> kensi >>>>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your >>>>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) >>>>> I win. *snicker* >>>> >>>> You lost, big time. >>> >>> You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi won. >> >> That means you are in middle school! Name your school, loon! > > Non sequitur. > Sequitur. Name it, nutjob.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 21:00 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <pev0hf$bad$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #688324 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 16:28:33 -0400, benj wrote: > On 6/2/2018 1:49 PM, kensi wrote: >> On 6/2/2018 11:29 AM, benj wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 12:10 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>> kensi >>>>>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your >>>>>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) >>>>>> I win. *snicker* >>>>> >>>>> You lost, big time. >>>> >>>> You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi >>>> won. >>> >>> That means you are in middle school! Name your school, loon! >> >> Non sequitur. > > Sequitur. Nuh-uh, kensi is correct: "Jeff Relf is reduced to am not, am too type replies; therefore Nadegda is in middle school" is a non sequitur, which phrase literally means "does not follow". -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 14:03 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <barm8s.qtq.19.1@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #688338 |
On 2018-06-02 2:00 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 16:28:33 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 6/2/2018 1:49 PM, kensi wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 11:29 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 6/2/2018 12:10 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>> kensi >>>>>>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your >>>>>>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) >>>>>>> I win. *snicker* >>>>>> >>>>>> You lost, big time. >>>>> >>>>> You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi >>>>> won. >>>> >>>> That means you are in middle school! Name your school, loon! >>> >>> Non sequitur. >> >> Sequitur. > > Nuh-uh, kensi is correct: "Jeff Relf is reduced to am not, am too type > replies; therefore Nadegda is in middle school" is a non sequitur, which > phrase literally means "does not follow". > non seq this
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 14:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.357cace0e570aaf3993bf2@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #688338 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <pev0hf$bad$12@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... > > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 16:28:33 -0400, benj wrote: > > > On 6/2/2018 1:49 PM, kensi wrote: > >> On 6/2/2018 11:29 AM, benj wrote: > >>> On 6/2/2018 12:10 AM, Nadegda wrote: > >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, > >>>> melt! > >>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: > >>>>> kensi > >>>>>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your > >>>>>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) > >>>>>> I win. *snicker* > >>>>> > >>>>> You lost, big time. > >>>> > >>>> You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi > >>>> won. > >>> > >>> That means you are in middle school! Name your school, loon! > >> > >> Non sequitur. > > > > Sequitur. > > Nuh-uh, kensi is correct: "Jeff Relf is reduced to am not, am too type > replies; therefore Nadegda is in middle school" is a non sequitur, which > phrase literally means "does not follow". I'm not following... -- Checkmate ® Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-06-02 19:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: The job market. |
| Message-ID | <v8GQC.265913$ll2.155144@fx35.iad> |
| In reply to | #688338 |
On 6/2/2018 5:00 PM, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 16:28:33 -0400, benj wrote: > >> On 6/2/2018 1:49 PM, kensi wrote: >>> On 6/2/2018 11:29 AM, benj wrote: >>>> On 6/2/2018 12:10 AM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 08:18:57 -0700, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote: >>>>>> kensi >>>>>>> I see you have run out of actual arguments to substantiate your >>>>>>> position. (Which you never did state clearly, by the way.) >>>>>>> I win. *snicker* >>>>>> >>>>>> You lost, big time. >>>>> >>>>> You're reduced to "am not! Am too!" type replies. That means kensi >>>>> won. >>>> >>>> That means you are in middle school! Name your school, loon! >>> >>> Non sequitur. >> >> Sequitur. > > Nuh-uh, kensi is correct: "Jeff Relf is reduced to am not, am too type > replies; therefore Nadegda is in middle school" is a non sequitur, which > phrase literally means "does not follow". > Un-hUh, I am correct and Kensi is as dumb as you are. I Understand Latin, you uneducated nerd. So how many languages are you fluent in? It better be more than one if you intend to convince anyone of any educated liberal credentials. Given that all you do is call names and now do the "did-too, did-not" routine with Rolf, my observation of middle school recess activities strongly indicates that this middle school behavior means you are probably IN middle school. Hence my reply Sequitur. You Libs don't do logic, right?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web