Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #721880 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500 |
| Last post | 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 249 — 25 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2019-01-01 05:15 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 03:52 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-03 22:30 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 09:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 10:24 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-04 13:56 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-04 12:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-04 18:12 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-05 11:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-05 13:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-09 07:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 09:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-09 10:33 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:18 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-09 23:24 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 10:59 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:22 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:02 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 00:25 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:54 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 05:01 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:05 +0000
NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 23:27 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 16:43 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 19:17 -0500
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:54 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 11:03 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 11:05 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change eSrgio <invaalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-16 12:04 -0600
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:56 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 19:59 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 22:36 -0800
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-13 08:38 -0700
Re: NOMINATION Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.edu> - 2019-01-13 10:52 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-12 18:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-13 21:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 14:35 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-14 00:01 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-13 19:54 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-15 02:28 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 20:58 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-15 00:03 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-14 23:52 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-15 08:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 04:04 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-16 09:38 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 01:41 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:45 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 14:53 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-16 20:57 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sir Gaygory's Owner's Owner 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2019-01-16 15:05 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:50 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-16 20:31 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-16 18:40 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-16 19:02 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:09 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 20:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:47 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 10:15 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:20 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 13:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 01:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 18:30 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-16 18:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 20:10 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 05:12 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-16 22:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-17 22:23 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-17 15:31 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 18:49 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 04:06 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 20:19 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 06:24 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-17 23:28 -0800
Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-18 22:09 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 15:22 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:27 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:20 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:32 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:40 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 21:46 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 19:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2019-01-18 22:26 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 15:11 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 00:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-18 17:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 18:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 03:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:58 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 21:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 23:48 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 10:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-18 20:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:10 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:43 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:42 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 18:17 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 02:41 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-18 20:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:27 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:34 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:36 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:46 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:48 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:53 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:57 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:10 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:44 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:25 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-21 21:44 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:33 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-22 04:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:53 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:59 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 15:38 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 17:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:14 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 20:58 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 21:00 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-20 09:17 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700
Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800
Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700
Nadegda can't handle the truth. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800
Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-19 15:41 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 17:52 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:57 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 18:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 21:56 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:56 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:35 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 01:22 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 18:49 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 02:01 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2019-01-19 21:03 -0500
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 19:09 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:16 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 22:51 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 15:55 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-19 23:04 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 16:12 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:16 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:48 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-20 00:00 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-19 17:36 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:57 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-21 17:19 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-19 14:53 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 23:20 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-20 04:19 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 22:20 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-20 08:47 -0700
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2019-01-19 10:12 +0000
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-19 07:33 -0800
Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-19 11:07 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-12 07:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-12 09:42 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:59 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-09 09:49 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-09 13:28 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-09 14:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-10 12:12 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-10 15:22 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2019-01-10 15:28 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-11 09:48 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-12 08:03 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 19:26 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2019-01-10 05:20 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-11 01:57 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2019-01-20 07:29 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 05:55 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Avenging Angel <Not.fucking.likely@NoWay.com> - 2019-01-01 16:07 +0000
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> - 2019-01-01 10:36 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2019-01-01 09:38 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2019-01-01 11:49 -0600
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:23 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:33 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:38 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:37 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:41 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2019-01-01 14:43 -0500
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:18 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:32 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:42 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:50 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:54 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:05 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-01 15:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 12:55 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:00 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:04 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:17 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:25 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:27 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 13:44 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:57 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2019-01-01 14:06 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> - 2019-01-01 12:48 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change % <persent@gmail.com> - 2019-01-01 13:58 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2019-01-16 09:33 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-17 20:23 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change Just Wondering <JW@me.com> - 2019-01-18 00:13 -0700
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 19:34 -0800
Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change "Chris M. Thomasson" <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> - 2019-01-18 21:09 -0800
Page 8 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 13 Next page →
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 08:45 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ae4592d6253ed8a93@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724083 |
In article <q20v8u$q1l$2@dont-email.me>, ahh_f_it@crap.nothing says... > >On 1/19/2019 8:14 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:38:54 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> >>> On 1/19/2019 2:48 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:46:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <q208p5$ptt$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Error: not a citation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN >>>>>> never said it. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement- >>>>> buzzfeed/index.html >>>> >>>> 404 >>>> >>>> No surprise there, really. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >> index.html >>> >>> Works for me. Try again. >> >> Still 404. > >I almost have to call you a strange person! Do not mung up the link on >purpose... Why did you do that more than once? > >https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > >Works for me, again... wow. > >> >> <shrug> >> > >VERY strange! ;^o Nads is a lib, she will ignore facts and lie to cover her ass.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-22 03:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q263oq$h3d$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724083 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 21:00:14 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 1/19/2019 8:14 PM, Nadegda wrote: >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:38:54 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> >>> On 1/19/2019 2:48 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>> melt! >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:46:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <q208p5$ptt$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Error: not a citation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN >>>>>> never said it. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement- >>>>> buzzfeed/index.html >>>> >>>> 404 >>>> >>>> No surprise there, really. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >> index.html >>> >>> Works for me. Try again. >> >> Still 404. > > I almost have to call you a strange person! Do not mung up the link on > purpose... Why did you do that more than once? Do what? > https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/muel1er-statement-buzzfeed/ index.html > > Works for me, again... wow. Eh. Still 404. > VERY strange! ;^o Indeed. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-21 20:50 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36b040ec7bbd4320b0f@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724275 |
In article <q263oq$h3d$5@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 21:00:14 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >> On 1/19/2019 8:14 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:38:54 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/19/2019 2:48 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>> melt! >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:46:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <q208p5$ptt$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>>> says... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Error: not a citation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN >>>>>>> never said it. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement- >>>>>> buzzfeed/index.html >>>>> >>>>> 404 >>>>> >>>>> No surprise there, really. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >>> index.html >>>> >>>> Works for me. Try again. >>> >>> Still 404. >> >> I almost have to call you a strange person! Do not mung up the link on >> purpose... Why did you do that more than once? > >Do what? > >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/muel1er-statement-buzzfeed/ >index.html >> >> Works for me, again... wow. > >Eh. Still 404. > >> VERY strange! ;^o > >Indeed. Your lying precedes you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 08:44 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ae4563eb319d94a92@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724079 |
In article <q20sk1$ptt$37@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:38:54 -0800, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >> On 1/19/2019 2:48 PM, Nadegda wrote: >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:46:32 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <q208p5$ptt$17@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Error: not a citation. >>>>>> >>>>>> oh yea, cnn lies all the time >>>>> >>>>> It's not CNN I don't trust, it's you. Now, show me a link, or CNN >>>>> never said it. >>>> >>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement- >>>> buzzfeed/index.html >>> >>> 404 >>> >>> No surprise there, really. >>> >>> >> >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/ >index.html >> >> Works for me. Try again. > >Still 404. > ><shrug> Denial is a major trait of the lefty losers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 10:08 -0800 |
| Subject | Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.20--10.08am.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #724079 |
This is wrong, an 'l' was replaced with a '1':
> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html
^
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html
^
" Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report
that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress "
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 13:39 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. |
| Message-ID | <q22f82$ufo$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #724112 |
On 1/20/2019 1:08 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > This is wrong, an 'l' was replaced with a '1': >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > ^ > https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > ^ > " Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report > that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress " > Just shows you how far technology has sunken the world, Rolf. Time was when a typewriter used the same character for 1 and lower case L.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 12:10 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ae759324f4d1b8aa4@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724112 |
In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.20--10.08am.Seattle.2019>, Jeff-Relf.Me @. says... > >This is wrong, an 'l' was replaced with a '1': >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > ^ > https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > ^ >" Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report > that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress " Nads will tell you links dont work instead of refuting it because it comes from her babysitter CNN.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson " <ahh_f_it@crap.nothing> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 15:31 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. |
| Message-ID | <q230ck$pp8$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #724117 |
On 1/20/2019 11:10 AM, Skeeter wrote: > In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.20--10.08am.Seattle.2019>, Jeff-Relf.Me @. > says... >> >> This is wrong, an 'l' was replaced with a '1': >>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >> ^ >> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >> ^ >> " Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report >> that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress " > > Nads will tell you links dont work instead of refuting it because it > comes from her babysitter CNN. > Afaict, she added the 1 and line break on purpose. Very odd person indeed. My original post was: _________________________ https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html Works for me. Try again. _________________________ She mutated it. What a fuc%ed up thing to do. Bad.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 16:34 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report. |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36aeb38c70a7df45ab7@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724141 |
In article <q230ck$pp8$1@dont-email.me>, ahh_f_it@crap.nothing says... > >On 1/20/2019 11:10 AM, Skeeter wrote: >> In article <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.20--10.08am.Seattle.2019>, Jeff-Relf.Me @. >> says... >>> >>> This is wrong, an 'l' was replaced with a '1': >>>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >>> ^ >>> https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >>> ^ >>> " Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report >>> that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress " >> >> Nads will tell you links dont work instead of refuting it because it >> comes from her babysitter CNN. >> > >Afaict, she added the 1 and line break on purpose. Very odd person >indeed. My original post was: >_________________________ >https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > >Works for me. Try again. >_________________________ > >She mutated it. What a fuc%ed up thing to do. Bad. Yea and she's a dummy head too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 10:31 -0800 |
| Subject | Nadegda can't handle the truth. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Jan.20--10.31am.Seattle.2019> |
| In reply to | #724047 |
Chris replied: > > > CNN: " Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report > > > that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress " > > > > > > CNN.COM/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > > > > 404 No surprise there, really. > > CNN.COM/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html > > Works for me. Try again. Nadegda intentionally borks the link; replacing an 'l' with a '1'; then blames it on Skeeter. She can't handle the truth, most obviously.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-20 13:32 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Nadegda can't handle the truth. |
| Message-ID | <btvbdp.a51.19.9@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #724113 |
On 2019-01-20 11:31 a.m., Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > Chris replied: >>>> CNN: " Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report >>>> that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress " >>>> >>>> CNN.COM/2019/01/18/po1itics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >>> >>> 404 No surprise there, really. >> >> CNN.COM/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html >> >> Works for me. Try again. > > Nadegda intentionally borks the link; > replacing an 'l' with a '1'; then blames it on Skeeter. > > She can't handle the truth, most obviously. > it's ok you can't tell it anyway
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <btsuar.utv.19.3@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #724006 |
On 2019-01-19 3:34 p.m., Skeeter wrote: > In article <q2088l$ptt$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:55:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>> melt! >>>>>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts >>>>>>> by Checkmate! In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>, nad318b404 >>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by # > Checkmate! In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > >>>>>>> # > >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid >>>>>>> says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>> when # >>>>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article # > >>>>>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> # > # > nad318b404 # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. >>>>>>> Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, >>>>>>> Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety >>>>>>> goggles when # >>>>>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article # > >>>>>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes >>>>>>> again. >>>>>>> Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, >>>>>>> Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety >>>>>>> goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article # > >>>>>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes >>>>>>> again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 -0800, >>>>>>> # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved >>>>>>> safety # >>>>>>>> goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article # >>>>>>>> # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > >>>>>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing >>>>>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 >>>>>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved >>>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In >>>>>>> article # >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >>>>>>>> # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing >>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 14:35:52 >>>>>>> -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI >>>>>>> approved # >>>>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In >>>>>>> article # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # >>>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing >>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 >>>>>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI >>>>>>> approved # >>>>>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! >>>>>>> In # >>>>>>>> article # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > >>>>>>> nad318b404 # >>>>>>>> # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design >>>>>>> schemes to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > >>>>>>> climate # > # > change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> From: Nadegda # > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, >>>>>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # > >>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the >>>>>>> right-wing # > >>>>>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 >>>>>>> 05:01:02 # >>>>>>>> -0800, >>>>>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall >>>>>>> seeing the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months # >>>>>>>> after # >>>>>>>> I # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. >>>>>>> Has it # >>>>>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long? >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is your >>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> problem, >>>>>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > # >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> refer # > # # > to your # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather # >>>>>>>> than # > the # >>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > second? >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting as >>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> "Nadegda" >>>>>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > AUK, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody >>>>>>> posting as # > >>>>>>> # > "Kensi". >>>>>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on # >>>>>>>> for # > two or # > # > three # > months, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > >>>>>>> who made # > it # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > happen. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT: It # > wasn't you. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue >>>>>>> that whole # > # > threads # > in # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one I >>>>>>> linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # > >>>>>>> silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012) >>>>>>> # > # > # > have # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > huge >>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> conspiracy # >>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > >>>>>>> want to # # > > continue # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've done >>>>>>> it very # > # > kookily # > # > too. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit. I received my >>>>>>> HoT in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap piece >>>>>>> of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > HoT? # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that >>>>>>> there was no # > # > "Nads" # > or # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that >>>>>>> time, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread that >>>>>>> proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > # > >>>>>>> don't # >>>>>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, you're >>>>>>> # >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > >>>>>>> historical # >>>>>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were posting >>>>>>> at all # > in # > AC # > back # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > If # > you # > were around back then, you >>>>>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that >>>>>>> sock was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting >>>>>>> most of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > >>>>>>> bonkers" # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK >>>>>>> as # >>>>>>>> "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling liar, >>>>>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big Lie >>>>>>> over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of # >>>>>>> eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # > >>>>>>> while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls a 1 >>>>>>> on their saving throw? >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, I >>>>>>> suppose # > ... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in >>>>>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of >>>>>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the >>>>>>> same horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when you >>>>>>> buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # > >>>>>>> take over # > the Ko0k # > Awards, >>>>>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was in >>>>>>> the # > # > # > process of # > destroying. It doesn't # > change >>>>>>> the fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being an >>>>>>> FNVW # > and # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed. Of # > course >>>>>>> you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows better. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you >>>>>>> admit I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt >>>>>>> to erase more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps >>>>>>> "stunt" would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic >>>>>>> fail. No one sanctioned # > it, >>>>>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you >>>>>>> finally # > tried to # > give away # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three >>>>>>> different # # > > bonafied # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to do >>>>>>> with # > TWNE. # > # > Then, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of it, >>>>>>> and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote except >>>>>>> very # > sporadically. The # > fact is, # > you # > # > failed on >>>>>>> all accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW, because # > you're >>>>>>> one # >>>>>>>> # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than >>>>>>> most of the # > # > other # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > K0oks, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, >>>>>>> as # >>>>>>>> evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings >>>>>>>> about # >>>>>>>> Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a rapist), >>>>>>> etc, # > etc. The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a # > >>>>>>> Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves >>>>>>> that you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt! >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Translation: "I've just been totally spanked and >>>>>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in my >>>>>>> defense." >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of lines >>>>>>> of # > frothy # >>>>>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID that >>>>>>> just so # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your >>>>>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer >>>>>>> than I thought. Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking >>>>>>> years? That really IS # > pathetic... >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying >>>>>>> to # >>>>>>>> convince # >>>>>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy # >>>>>>>> McMarionette # > ... >>>>>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress. >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried >>>>>>> it, >>>>>>> and # > it's # > not working now. Thank me for your spanking, and >>>>>>> ask if you # > may please # > have another. >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's >>>>>>> really going # > on: >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance >>>>>>> dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance >>>>>>> dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance. >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > >>>>>>> # > Empty quiver again? >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer? >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # <snicker> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullseye. >>>>>> >>>>>> Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>>> boring. >>>>>> How about a new topic? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >>>> investigation- >>>>>> after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>>> BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>>> "high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want >>>>>> to know. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>>>> you...LOLOLOL >>>> >>>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] >>> >>> I watched it on CNN you doof. >> >> Error: not a citation. > > oh yea, cnn lies all the time > what are you doing in this group
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 15:47 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad56dbee9fc6c6a30@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724008 |
In article <btsuar.utv.19.3@news.alt.net>, persent@gmail.com says... >>> Error: not a citation. >> >> oh yea, cnn lies all the time >> >what are you doing in this group > training the fake you
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 23:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gahqr3Fcsg0U8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #724006 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 15:34:01 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > In article <q2088l$ptt$15@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid > says... >> >>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:55:53 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <q1u2od$ptt$4@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>melt! >>>>On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>>> says... >>>>>> >>>>>>Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>>>>>melt! >>>>>>On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 23:28:46 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by Checkmate! In article <q1rrfj$jk8$18@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> nad318b404 @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>> melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:25 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading >>>>>>> posts by # > Checkmate! In article <q1rjbs$jk8$17@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> nad318b404 # > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > >>>>>>> # > >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > melt! # On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 18:49:48 -0800, Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <q1qv96$jk8$14@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> nad318b404 # > # > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, >>>>>>> snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 22:34:29 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when >>>>>>> reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> <q1p2rj$jk8$11@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # > >>>>>>> @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. >>>>>>> Melt, >>>>>>> # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:10:16 -0800, Checkmate >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles >>>>>>> when # >>>>>>> > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article # > >>>>>>> <q1olgi$jk8$9@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> # > # > nad318b404 # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. >>>>>>> Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:48:52 -0800, >>>>>>> Checkmate wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety >>>>>>> goggles when # >>>>>>> # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article # > >>>>>>> # > <q1o54s$jk8$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> # > # > # > nad318b404 # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes >>>>>>> again. >>>>>>> Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 01:41:31 -0800, >>>>>>> Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety >>>>>>> goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article # > >>>>>>> # > # > <q1magu$vbv$2@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > nad318b404 # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > @gmail.invalid says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing >>>>>>> snowflakes again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:58:23 >>>>>>> -0800, # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved >>>>>>> safety # >>>>>>> > goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In article >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > # > # > # > <q1jgh5$gdu$51@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > # >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing >>>>>>> snowflakes # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:54:09 >>>>>>> -0800, # > # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI approved >>>>>>> safety # # > > goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In >>>>>>> article # >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > <q1gjhk$gdu$42@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 # > >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the right-wing >>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 >>>>>>> 14:35:52 -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI >>>>>>> approved # >>>>>>> > safety # # > > goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! In >>>>>>> article # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > <q1g9ev$gdu$33@dont-email.me>, # > nad318b404 >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > # >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the >>>>>>> right-wing # >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 >>>>>>> 18:50:32 # > -0800, # > # > # > Checkmate # > wrote: >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Warning! Always wear ANSI >>>>>>> approved # >>>>>>> # > > safety # # > > goggles # > when # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > > reading # > posts # > by # > Checkmate! >>>>>>> In # >>>>>>> > article # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > <q1drrv$gdu$22@dont-email.me>, # > >>>>>>> nad318b404 # >>>>>>> > # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > @gmail.invalid # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > says... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Subject: Re: Design >>>>>>> schemes to # > help # # > > buildings # > # > outlast # > # > >>>>>>> climate # > # > change # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> From: Nadegda # > <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Newsgroups: sci.physics, >>>>>>> # > # > # > talk.politics.guns, # > # > # > alt.checkmate # > # # >>>>>>> > # >>>>>>> > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Time to trigger the >>>>>>> right-wing # > >>>>>>> # > snowflakes # > # > again. # > Melt, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > snowflakes, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > melt! >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 >>>>>>> 05:01:02 # >>>>>>> > -0800, >>>>>>> # > # > # > Checkmate # > # > wrote: # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > I also don't recall >>>>>>> seeing the # > Nads # > nym # > # > until a # > few # > # > months >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > after # >>>>>>> > I # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > spanked Gary out of AUK. >>>>>>> Has it # >>>>>>> # > > really # > been # > that # > # > long? >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Your faulty memory is >>>>>>> your # >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> problem, >>>>>>> # > # > not # > mine. # > # > Also: do # > you # > # > usually # > >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> refer # > # # > to your # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > interlocutor in # > the third # > person # > rather >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > than # > the # >>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > second? >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > There was no one posting >>>>>>> as # >>>>>>> > "Nadegda" >>>>>>> # > # > when I # > # > spanked # > # > Gary # > out of # > # > >>>>>>> AUK, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > nor was there anybody >>>>>>> posting as # > >>>>>>> # > "Kensi". >>>>>>> # > # > # > That # > # > whole # # > > process # # > > dragged on >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > for # > two or # > # > three # > months, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > and the # > archives # > clearly show # > # > >>>>>>> who made # > it # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > happen. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > HINT: It # > wasn't you. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You're now trying to argue >>>>>>> that whole # > # > threads # > in # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > Google's # > # > archive # > # > (like # the one >>>>>>> I linked # > to # > of # > kensi # > # > and me slapping # > you # >>>>>>> > silly back # > # > in # > # > 2012) >>>>>>> # > # > # > have # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > somehow # > been faked. You now # > need a # > >>>>>>> huge # >>>>>>> > conspiracy # >>>>>>> # > # > > # > # > theory # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > including a # complicit Google # > if you # > >>>>>>> want to # # > > continue # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > making # # > > your # > untenable k'lame. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # You have lost, and you've >>>>>>> done it very # > # > kookily # > # > too. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # As I had planned all along. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Pure bullshit. I received my >>>>>>> HoT in # > 2012, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Tee hee, you call that cheap >>>>>>> piece of # > "made in # > # > China" # > # > plastic # > a # > >>>>>>> HoT? # > # # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and I know damned well that >>>>>>> there was no # > # > "Nads" # > or # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > "Kensi" # > # > posting # > in # > AUK at that >>>>>>> time, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # I already linked to a thread >>>>>>> that proves # > there # > # > were # > both. # > I # > really # > >>>>>>> # > don't # >>>>>>> see what # > else I can # > add # > here, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > other than to # > # > reiterate that # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > > either your # memory is faulty, >>>>>>> you're # >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> # > intentionally # > lying # > to # > # > engage # > in # > >>>>>>> historical # >>>>>>> # > # > revisionism, or # > you're stark # > raving # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > bonkers. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > and very few people were >>>>>>> posting at all # > in # > AC # > back # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > > # > then. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > If # > you # > were around back then, you >>>>>>> were # > using a # > # > # > different # # > > sock... # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > care to # > tell the class what that >>>>>>> sock was? # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Paranoia. OK, then, I'm putting >>>>>>> most of my # > # > money # > on # > "stark # > # > raving # > # > >>>>>>> bonkers" # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # as the explanation. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # > You weren't posting here or in AUK >>>>>>> as # >>>>>>> > "Nadegda" # > in # > 2012. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > You're # > a # > big # > fat porky-telling >>>>>>> liar, >>>>>>> with # > your # > pants # > on # > # > fire. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Refuge in simply repeating the Big >>>>>>> Lie over # > and # > over # > again # > in # > the # > hope # > of >>>>>>> # eventually # > getting a # > natural 20 # > on the hit # > die # >>>>>>> > while # > someone, # > # > # > # > # > # > # > somewhere # rolls >>>>>>> a 1 on their saving throw? >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > # Well, it worked for Joseph Goebbels, >>>>>>> I suppose # > ... >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # > Prove you posted here, or in AUK in >>>>>>> 2012... # > # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > # <k42vim$o8i$5@dont-email.me> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # > So it looks like you made a grand total of >>>>>>> about two # > # > posts # > in # > late # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > > September of 2012, when you rode in on the >>>>>>> same horse # > # > Fakey # > rode # > in # > on. # > That's when >>>>>>> you buffoons got that # > # > stupid # > "Tetrarchy" idea # > to # >>>>>>> > take over # > the Ko0k # > Awards, >>>>>>> # > # > which I had # > either already # > destroyed, or # > was >>>>>>> in the # > # > # > process of # > destroying. It doesn't # > >>>>>>> change the fact that # > # > the # > "Tetrarchy" # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > blew up in your face, and # > over six years later, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > you've yet to fulfill # > your dream of being >>>>>>> an FNVW # > and # # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > resurrecting # > that which I destroyed. Of # > >>>>>>> course you'll # > deny # > # > # > that, but everyone # > knows >>>>>>> better. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > # More historical revisionism. This time you >>>>>>> admit I # > *was* # > # > active in # > # # > 2012 ... but attempt >>>>>>> to erase more # > recent # > history, # > such as my # > two-year >>>>>>> # # > # > # > # > # > stint as FNVW 2015-2017. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Your self-appointed "stint"... or perhaps >>>>>>> "stunt" would # > # > describe # > it # > # > better, was an epic >>>>>>> fail. No one sanctioned # > it, >>>>>>> # > # > and you # > flailed # > around # > miserably, until you >>>>>>> finally # > tried to # > give away # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > That-Which-Never-Existed, to no less that three >>>>>>> different # # > > bonafied # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > # > Ko0ks, who were smart enough to want nothing to >>>>>>> do with # > TWNE. # > # > Then, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > your new Libtard sock tried to make a go of >>>>>>> it, and # > seldom # > even # > # > # > attempted to run a vote >>>>>>> except very # > sporadically. The # > fact is, # > you # > # > >>>>>>> failed on all accounts. # > You could never be an # > FNVW, >>>>>>> because # > you're one # >>>>>>> > # > of the # > biggest Ko0ks here. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > Granted, you function at a higher level than >>>>>>> most of the # > # > other # >>>>>>> # > # > # > > K0oks, >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # > but you lack any semblance of logic or reason, >>>>>>> as # >>>>>>> > evidenced # > my # > your # > # > often hysterical blatherings >>>>>>> > about # >>>>>>> > Trump, Kavanaugh # > (whom # > you # > declared # > was a >>>>>>> > rapist), >>>>>>> etc, # > etc. The very fact # > that you # > claim to # > be a # >>>>>>> > Ko0kologist, # > # > # > # > # > given your track record, proves >>>>>>> that you're nothing but # > a # > garden # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > variety, run-of-the-mill k0Ok yourself. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # Nicely foamed, Babbles McButthurt! >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > # > Translation: "I've just been totally spanked and >>>>>>> humiliated # > by # > the # > # > facts, and I've got nothing in >>>>>>> my defense." >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # ... says the kook who just drooled out dozens of >>>>>>> lines of # > frothy # >>>>>>> # > # > > vitriol # in response to one teensy little Message-ID >>>>>>> that just so # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > happens to have # proved you wrong. >>>>>>> # > # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > # > All you "proved," is that you've been failing in your >>>>>>> botched # # > > attempt to # > run things around here for longer >>>>>>> than I thought. Has # > it # > really been # > over six fucking >>>>>>> years? That really IS # > pathetic... >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # Nicely foamed. Now keep dancing while desperately trying >>>>>>> to # >>>>>>> > convince # >>>>>>> # > # > yourself that I'm not the one pulling your strings, Foamy >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> > McMarionette # > ... >>>>>>> # > # > # your flailings amuse your Usenet Lady and Mistress. >>>>>>> # > # > # >>>>>>> # > # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > # > >>>>>>> # > # > The Foam Defense didn't work the first two times you tried >>>>>>> it, >>>>>>> and # > it's # > not working now. Thank me for your spanking, and >>>>>>> ask if you # > may please # > have another. >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # Running the above through the Truth Viewer reveals what's >>>>>>> really going # > on: >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # > Dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance dance >>>>>>> dance dance # > dance # > dance dance dance dance dance dance >>>>>>> dance dance dance dance # > dance dance # > dance dance. >>>>>>> # > # >>>>>>> # > # <snicker> >>>>>>> # > >>>>>>> # > Empty quiver again? >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # When has yours ever been otherwise, Kookdancer? >>>>>>> # >>>>>>> # <snicker> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bullseye. >>>>>> >>>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>>>boring. >>>>>>How about a new topic? >>>>>> >>>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >>>>investigation- >>>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>>>> >>>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds >>>>>>want to know. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>>>> you...LOLOLOL >>>> >>>>[non-far-right-news-site citation needed] >>> >>> I watched it on CNN you doof. >> >>Error: not a citation. > > oh yea, cnn lies all the time I like Nads, but she's gone a bit kooky -- next she'll be saying NYT headlines are "fake news". https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/18/us/politics/buzzfeed-cohen-russia-tower.html People need to realize that giving citations for common knowledge is not obligated by any means. It's as bad as people who start semantics arguments, claiming that a definition of a word doesn't apply unless the item meets _all_ senses of the definition... -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 10:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <gagd47F4q1mU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #723885 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: > >> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >> says... >>> >>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>boring. >>>How about a new topic? >>> >>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- > investigation- >>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>> >>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want >>>to know. >> >> >> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >> you...LOLOLOL > > [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] Not for common knowledge it isn't. -- -v
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 07:34 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ace378a53cec8f996076@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #723926 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <gagd47F4q1mU2@mid.individual.net>, vallor@cultnix.org says... # # On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: # # > Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: # > # >> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid # >> says... # >>> # >>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit # >>>boring. # >>>How about a new topic? # >>> # >>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- # > investigation- # >>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- # >>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 # >>> # >>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of # >>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want # >>>to know. # >> # >> # >> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for # >> you...LOLOLOL # > # > [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] # # Not for common knowledge it isn't. Looks like Nads stepped in some dog shit again. -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 22:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <q208cf$ptt$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #723926 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:40:07 +0000, vallor wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: > >> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >> melt! >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >> >>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>> says... >>>> >>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>boring. >>>>How about a new topic? >>>> >>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >> investigation- >>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>> >>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want >>>>to know. >>> >>> >>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>> you...LOLOLOL >> >> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] > > Not for common knowledge it isn't. So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. -- FNVWe Nadegda "By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you." -- Mike Godwin, Aug 13, 2017, 8:03 PM Skeeter admits he mooches his mother's laptop: http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154073947600
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <chico@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 15:36 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36ad546597b016aa28@news.eternal-september.org> |
| In reply to | #724003 |
In article <q208cf$ptt$16@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid says... > >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:40:07 +0000, vallor wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: >> >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, >>> melt! >>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: >>> >>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit >>>>>boring. >>>>>How about a new topic? >>>>> >>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- >>> investigation- >>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- >>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 >>>>> >>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of >>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want >>>>>to know. >>>> >>>> >>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for >>>> you...LOLOLOL >>> >>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] >> >> Not for common knowledge it isn't. > >So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. No proof of criminal behavior. As for less vocal? You're more vocal about him in here than his followers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Checkmate <oshay.shad@yahoo.corn> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 22:12 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <MPG.36adb10afe0bb98899607c@news.altopia.com> |
| In reply to | #724009 |
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate! In article <MPG.36ad546597b016aa28@news.eternal- september.org>, chico@invalid.invalid says... # # In article <q208cf$ptt$16@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid # says... # > # >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! # >On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:40:07 +0000, vallor wrote: # > # >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:41:19 +0000, Nadegda wrote: # >> # >>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, # >>> melt! # >>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 18:17:13 -0700, Skeeter wrote: # >>> # >>>> In article <q1tirf$ptt$2@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid # >>>> says... # >>>>> # >>>>>Got you good, but this is starting to get more than a little bit # >>>>>boring. # >>>>>How about a new topic? # >>>>> # >>>>>https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/newspolitics/democrats-demand- # >>> investigation- # >>>>>after-report-that-trump-ordered-michael-cohen-to-lie-to-congress/ar- # >>>>>BBSoREu?li=BBnbcA1 # >>>>> # >>>>>Now, would you say that suborning perjury falls under the heading of # >>>>>"high crimes and misdemeanors", in your opinion? Enquiring minds want # >>>>>to know. # >>>> # >>>> # >>>> And Mooler said today that the story was bullshit, no plane for # >>>> you...LOLOLOL # >>> # >>> [non-far-right-news-site citation needed] # >> # >> Not for common knowledge it isn't. # > # >So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected # >but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of # >drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. # # No proof of criminal behavior. # # As for less vocal? You're more vocal about him in here than his # followers. Yeah! What he said... -- Checkmate ® Copyright © 2018 all rights reserved AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore) Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Awards (Post-Burnore) Co-winner Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award May 2001, (Brethern of Beelzebub troll) Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker award, Feb 2012 Author, Humorist, Cynic Philosopher, Humanitarian Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars Usenet Shot-Caller In loving memory of The Battle Kitten May 2010-February 12, 2017 "There are many here among us, who feel that life is but a joke." "I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as kensi." -Nadegda Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-19 17:38 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Trump's subornation of perjury (was Re: Design schemes to help buildings outlast climate change) |
| Message-ID | <kh974epi6vlhstaciucbir1ll6i060akb2@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #724003 |
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:29:35 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: <...> >So, you're a Trumpie. You're less vocal about it than most. I suspected >but it took over two years for you to confirm it with the above line of >drool defending his inexcusable and criminal behavior. Why is it, then, that your precious Mooler hasn't managed to file a single criminal charge against the President after trying so hard for almost two years? How's it feel to ALWAYS be on the losing side, Nadegda? -- Everybody here likes Yours Truly, Gregøry Hall - Bombastic Loudmouth of the South
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 13 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 … 13 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web