Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #700199 > unrolled thread

Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-27 18:44 -0700
    Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 18:48 -0700
    Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. carleto4157990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 19:48 -0700
      UnEmployment is a (wonderful) vacation. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-28 06:23 -0700
        Re: UnEmployment is a (wonderful) vacation. consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 13:34 -0700
        Re: UnEmployment is a (wonderful) vacation. benj <benj.fake@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 18:11 -0400
          I've a shit ton of work to do ( for my boss ). Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-28 15:16 -0700
            Re: I've a shit ton of work to do ( for my boss ). "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-08-30 10:46 -0400
              Re: I've a shit ton of work to do ( for my boss ). "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:05 -0700
                Re: I've a shit ton of work to do ( for my boss ). "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-08-30 14:13 -0700
              Re: I've a shit ton of work to do ( for my boss ). "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 13:16 -0700
                Re: I've a shit ton of work to do ( for my boss ). "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2018-08-30 14:06 -0700
        Re: UnEmployment is a (wonderful) vacation. "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesbabes@bigass-babes.com> - 2018-08-31 06:52 -0700
    Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. SilverSlimer <silver@slim.er> - 2018-08-28 13:44 +0000
      Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. consequently7990662@gmail.com - 2018-08-28 13:33 -0700
        Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-08-31 09:17 -0500
    Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-30 14:46 -0700
      Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-30 14:47 -0700
        Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 16:52 -0700
          Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-08-30 19:38 -0400
          Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Tommy <tom@outlook.com> - 2018-08-31 00:24 +0000
            Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-08-30 21:42 -0400
        Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-08-30 19:37 -0400
        Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-08-31 07:32 -0500
          Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-31 15:52 -0700
            Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-31 15:59 -0700
              Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-04 06:54 -0500
            Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-09-04 06:56 -0500
              Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-09-04 06:35 -0700
          Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-31 16:27 -0700
            Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 16:30 -0700
              Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-08-31 16:51 -0700
                Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-31 16:54 -0700
      Re: Visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity. Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 22:09 +0000
        The market of ideas. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-08-30 16:38 -0700
          Re: The market of ideas. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-08-30 16:42 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#700526

Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote in
news:MPG.35f2232884eac6cd9947c8@news.altopia.com: 

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by Checkmate!  In article <pm9omd$t62$3@dont-email.me>, 
> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> 
>> 
>> On 8/30/2018 2:46 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> > On 8/27/2018 6:44 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> >> (Poor) "undesirables" in communist Russia were worked to death in
>> >> gulags. Even today, "communist" China sends them to ReEducation
>> >> camps. Only a rich country, like America, can afford to be more
>> >> tolerant. 
>> >>
>> >> So, in a way, visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity.
>> >>
>> > 
>> > WTF?
>> 
>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it, 
>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
> 
> Those are called Democrats or Libtards.
> 

That would be the ones who live in million doller homes with wall around 
them.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700530

On 8/30/2018 8:24 PM, Tommy wrote:
> Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote in
> news:MPG.35f2232884eac6cd9947c8@news.altopia.com:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by Checkmate!  In article <pm9omd$t62$3@dont-email.me>,
>> invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid says...
>>> On 8/30/2018 2:46 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>> On 8/27/2018 6:44 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>> (Poor) "undesirables" in communist Russia were worked to death in
>>>>> gulags. Even today, "communist" China sends them to ReEducation
>>>>> camps. Only a rich country, like America, can afford to be more
>>>>> tolerant.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, in a way, visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity.
>>>>>
>>>> WTF?
>>>
>>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it,
>>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
>>
>> Those are called Democrats or Libtards.
> 
> That would be the ones who live in million doller homes with wall around
> them.

The powerful genius billionaires have the very best, very highest 
quality, and most very very beautiful walls that can stop ninja guys, even.

Like Chuck Norris, who lives the American dream with cows and horses and 
two very fine jet for doing Christmas splits to honor The President (no 
colusion!).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fkd46WY8fs

He's not a billionaire, but, he knows an amazing wall when he sees one.

-- 
Grizzly H.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700523

Chris M. Thomasson wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 8/30/2018 2:46 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/27/2018 6:44 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> (Poor) "undesirables" in communist Russia were worked to death in gulags.
>>> Even today, "communist" China sends them to ReEducation camps.
>>> Only a rich country, like America, can afford to be more tolerant.
>>>
>>> So, in a way, visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity.
>>>
>> 
>> WTF?
>
> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it, 
> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?

What country would that be, dude?

-- 
FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #13
A:	Doc, Happy, Bashful, Dopey, Sneezy, Sleepy, & Grumpy
Q:	Who were the Democratic presidential candidates?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700572

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it, 
>better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?

What if the people trying to "break in" want to work, while the
"homeless, totally legal citizens" do not?

-- 
"Unfortunately, the open source nature of Linux tends to attract the
type of persona who somehow believes that all avenues are one-way
streets set up to benefit him (and only him) as the true & deserving
holy center of the universe."  -  lying asshole "-hh"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700648

On 8/31/2018 5:32 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it,
>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
> 
> What if the people trying to "break in" want to work, while the
> "homeless, totally legal citizens" do not?
> 

What percentages are you referring to? What about a thief breaking in 
wanting as much free stuff as possible? A country should have to worry 
about our on homeless first, not about people breaking in. Think if 
somebody pitched a tent on your front lawn? Would it be bad to tell them 
to get the hell out?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700651

On 8/31/2018 3:52 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/31/2018 5:32 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it,
>>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
>>
>> What if the people trying to "break in" want to work, while the
>> "homeless, totally legal citizens" do not?
>>
> 
> What percentages are you referring to? What about a thief breaking in 
> wanting as much free stuff as possible? A country should have to worry 
> about our on homeless first, not about people breaking in. Think if 
> somebody pitched a tent on your front lawn? Would it be bad to tell them 
> to get the hell out?

A projection:

They jump your fence, open your door, enter, and simply sit down and 
start demanding food and health care, along with other things. Perhaps 
your bed is a bit too lumpy. They open your refrigerator and complain 
that you buy the wrong type of food. Ahhh... Let them say forever right? 
lol. What a total joke! Imvvho, you would most likely kick them the heck 
out in a blink of an eye.

You need to take care of your family, not some home invasion experts 
damn it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701068

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>They jump your fence, open your door, enter, and simply sit down and 
>start demanding food and health care (snipped, unread)

Idiot.

-- 
"Since you can't and won't (write a detailed article on how to
choose), it means there are too many choices in Linux distros.  Same
as there are too many choices in some categories of computer hardware:
Here are 23 DVD burners:"  -  DumFSck, lying shamelessly, and putting
his ignorance on display

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701069

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

>A country should have to worry about our on homeless first

Claims an idiot.

If they are veterans, I would agree.  Otherwise, it's a lifestyle
choice, most likely.

-- 
"heh!  In 1988 my car was broken into and cheap stereo was stolen.
The jigaboo who did it shed a filthy nappy hair or two, which I
spotted.  I made a police report and the White cop who responded wrote
'nappy hair' in the report and told me he once 'drew down on a nigger'
[exact quote] (draw down means point gun at).  Great cop!"  -  "DFS"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#701077

On 9/4/18 4:56 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
>> A country should have to worry about our on homeless first
> 
> Claims an idiot.
> 
> If they are veterans, I would agree.  Otherwise, it's a lifestyle
> choice, most likely.

Ah, demonetization of the poor. Got it.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700659

On 8/31/2018 5:32 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it,
>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
> 
> What if the people trying to "break in" want to work, while the
> "homeless, totally legal citizens" do not?
> 

Then we have to light up some metaphorical thing under their as%es to 
wake them up: Being homeless because of sheer laziness, is outright 
terrible!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700660

On 2018-08-31 4:27 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/31/2018 5:32 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it,
>>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
>>
>> What if the people trying to "break in" want to work, while the
>> "homeless, totally legal citizens" do not?
>>
> 
> Then we have to light up some metaphorical thing under their as%es to 
> wake them up: Being homeless because of sheer laziness, is outright 
> terrible!


why not , go on welfare , get a greyhound pass , tour the country

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700661

On 8/31/2018 4:30 PM, % wrote:
> On 2018-08-31 4:27 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>> On 8/31/2018 5:32 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it,
>>>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
>>>
>>> What if the people trying to "break in" want to work, while the
>>> "homeless, totally legal citizens" do not?
>>>
>>
>> Then we have to light up some metaphorical thing under their as%es to 
>> wake them up: Being homeless because of sheer laziness, is outright 
>> terrible!
> 
> 
> why not , go on welfare , get a greyhound pass , tour the country

Argh! Not all homeless are lazy, but some of them probably are. A 
country should try to help its non-lazy homeless before somebody 
breaking in on purpose.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700663

On 2018-08-31 4:51 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 8/31/2018 4:30 PM, % wrote:
>> On 2018-08-31 4:27 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>> On 8/31/2018 5:32 AM, chrisv wrote:
>>>> Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What if a country seems to want to treat people that break into it,
>>>>> better than its own homeless, totally legal citizens?
>>>>
>>>> What if the people trying to "break in" want to work, while the
>>>> "homeless, totally legal citizens" do not?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Then we have to light up some metaphorical thing under their as%es to 
>>> wake them up: Being homeless because of sheer laziness, is outright 
>>> terrible!
>>
>>
>> why not , go on welfare , get a greyhound pass , tour the country
> 
> Argh! Not all homeless are lazy, but some of them probably are. A 
> country should try to help its non-lazy homeless before somebody 
> breaking in on purpose.


i work in the field

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700504

Chris M. Thomasson <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 8/27/2018 6:44 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>> (Poor) "undesirables" in communist Russia were worked to death in gulags.
>> Even today, "communist" China sends them to ReEducation camps.
>> Only a rich country, like America, can afford to be more tolerant.
>> 
>> So, in a way, visible homelessness is a sign of prosperity.
>> 
> 
> WTF?
> 

Jeff is a practiced master of rationalizing his meager circumstances as
being the best of all possible worlds. 

I know a homeless guy who breezes through town regularly who constantly
thanks his good fortune to not have to pay for roof repairs. 

-- 
Odd Bodkin — Maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700516 — The market of ideas.

Speaking of me, "Odd" [sic] wrote:
> Jeff is a practiced master of rationalizing his meager circumstances
> as being the best of all possible worlds. 
> 
> I know a homeless guy who breezes through town regularly who constantly
> thanks his good fortune to not have to pay for roof repairs. 

Lots of people don't like the rat race, it's not just me.

The market of ideas is far more fascinating than the financial market.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#700519 — Re: The market of ideas.

On 2018-08-30 4:38 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Speaking of me, "Odd" [sic] wrote:
>> Jeff is a practiced master of rationalizing his meager circumstances
>> as being the best of all possible worlds.
>>
>> I know a homeless guy who breezes through town regularly who constantly
>> thanks his good fortune to not have to pay for roof repairs.
> 
> Lots of people don't like the rat race, it's not just me.
> 
> The market of ideas is far more fascinating than the financial market.
> 
homelessness isn't great but it has its moments

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web