Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #680176 > unrolled thread

A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400
    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 09:48 -0500
      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 11:23 -0400
        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0500
        " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-07 12:05 -0700
          Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 17:51 -0700
            Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 18:26 -0700
              " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K.   Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-07 20:40 -0700
                Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 20:52 -0700
                  Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 21:00 -0700
                    Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-08 04:05 +0000
                      Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:07 -0700
                    Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:06 -0700
                    Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-08 07:24 +0200
          Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-08 11:54 -0400
            Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
              Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:33 -0500
        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:06 -0400
          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:32 -0500
      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-07 11:43 -0400
        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:34 -0500
          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:52 -0500
        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:58 -0600
          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:55 +1000
            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:10 -0400
              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 06:40 +1000
                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 19:24 -0400
                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 19:59 -0400
                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:13 +1000
                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:48 +1000
                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:19 -0500
        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:54 +1000
          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 09:04 -0500
            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 11:29 -0400
              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:22 -0400
              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 11:22 -0500
          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:17 -0400
            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:46 -0400
                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:10 +1000
                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:28 -0400
                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:32 -0400
                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0500
                    Air causes cancer. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-09 10:54 -0700
                      Re: Air causes cancer. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:29 -0400
                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:12 -0600
                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 14:29 -0500
                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:33 -0600
                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:44 -0500
                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:45 +0000
                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-12 16:46 -0400
                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 15:03 -0600
                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:11 -0700
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-14 11:11 -0400
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:18 -0600
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:31 -0700
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-15 12:50 -0400
                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 10:12 +1000
                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 20:06 -0400
                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-15 00:48 -0500
                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:03 -0400
                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:58 +1000
                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:00 -0400
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 19:11 +1000
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:57 -0500
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:01 -0400
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 07:17 +1000
                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:44 -0500
                                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 14:08 +1000
                                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 11:35 -0500
                                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-17 17:55 +0100
                                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 06:00 +1000
                                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 22:40 +0000
                                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 09:15 +1000
                                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:03 -0400
                                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 19:32 -0500
                                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 01:36 +0000
                                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:46 -0700
                                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 22:36 -0500
                                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:01 -0400
                                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:33 -0400
                                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:21 -0500
                                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:59 -0400
                                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-18 16:02 -0400
                                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:47 +0000
                                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-18 18:49 -0500
                                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
                                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-19 23:39 +0000
                                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:45 -0700
                                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:57 -0700
                                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-20 12:25 -0400
                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:34 +1000
                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:59 -0500
                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:09 -0400
                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:17 -0400
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 11:29 -0600
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:13 +0000
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:20 -0600
                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:33 -0500
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0400
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:45 -0700
                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
                                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 01:34 +0000
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 13:04 -0500
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:07 -0400
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 16:59 -0400
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 22:31 +0000
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 15:46 -0700
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 20:50 -0400
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:46 -0500
                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 05:52 -0400
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:14 -0700
                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 12:47 -0500
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:43 -0700
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0700
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:27 +0000
                                Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-16 15:25 -0700
                                  Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:51 -0500
                                    Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-16 22:24 -0500
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-18 00:22 -0400
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:39 -0700
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-04-18 05:21 +0000
                                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 13:37 -0700
                                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-18 14:55 -0600
                                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:48 +0000
                                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 18:56 -0500
                                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-19 11:44 -0400
                                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:06 -0400
                                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:34 -0400
                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 12:20 -0500
                                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:14 +0000
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:56 -0500
                                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0400
                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-09 04:33 +0000
            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 06:17 +1000
              Does smoking cause cancer? (was: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 01:43 +0200
                Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 09:57 +1000
                  Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 02:02 +0200
                    Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 10:12 +1000
                      Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:36 -0500
                      Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 03:45 +0200
                      Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:50 -0400
                  Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 20:12 -0500
                    Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 11:40 +1000
                      Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:56 -0400
                        Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:05 +1000
                          Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:27 -0400
                            Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
                              Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:01 -0500
                                Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
                                Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:09 -0500
                                  Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:34 -0500
                                Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:51 -0400
                      Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:52 -0500
                        Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:22 -0400
                        Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
                          Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:13 -0500
                            Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:23 +1000
                              Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 19:43 -0500
                                Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 11:02 +1000
                              Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:58 -0400
                          Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:40 -0400
                      Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:08 -0500
                        Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 12:40 +1000
                        Ben Jacoby is neither funny nor informative, nothing good. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-09 19:54 -0700
              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:34 -0500
              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-09 10:52 -0400
                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 07:59 -0700
                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0700
                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-09 19:19 +0100
                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 13:36 -0500
                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:34 -0400
                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:58 -0500
                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Equalizer <coming4you@never.invalid.net> - 2018-04-09 22:58 +0000
                              Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 17:39 -0700
                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 13:05 -0700
                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:27 +0000
                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:27 -0700
                      Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-04-10 11:25 -0400
                        Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100
                          Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700
                            Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100
                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000
                    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600
                In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700
                Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
                  Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400
    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700
    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 22:41 -0700
    Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700

Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10  Next page →

#680440

On 4/9/2018 12:10 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science 
>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming.
>>>
>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj.
>>>
>>> *snicker*
>>>
>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for 
>> people dead! You all need to be banned!
>>
>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who 
>> smoked their whole life who don't have it.
> 
> 
> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". SMOKING tobacco products 
> increases one's risk of acquiring a smoking related disease. That 
> includes a variety of cancers.
> 
>   It's funny that science
>> doesn't know what "causes" cancer but you libs and your fantasies do.
> 
> **Actually, science does know what causes SOME cancers. Science does not 
> know what causes ALL cancers.
> 
> 
>>
>> A modulating factor? maybe. But like all combustion products sucking 
>> in a lot of them is not a good idea. But you scammers never say cut 
>> back on pollution, you all say cut back on CO2 which is of unproven 
>> effect.
> 
> **Wrong. CO2 is a known greenhouse gas.
> 
> 
>   You
>> libs always leave a wide swath of destruction everywhere your 
>> stupidity scorches the earth.
> 
> **There you go again: Displaying your stupidity for all to see.
> 
> 
You libs call truth "stupidity"because you are stupid.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680444

On 4/9/2018 12:10 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science 
>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming.
>>>
>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj.
>>>
>>> *snicker*
>>>
>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for 
>> people dead! You all need to be banned!
>>
>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who 
>> smoked their whole life who don't have it.
> 
> 
> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". SMOKING tobacco products 
> increases one's risk of acquiring a smoking related disease. That 
> includes a variety of cancers.
> 
>   It's funny that science
>> doesn't know what "causes" cancer but you libs and your fantasies do.
> 
> **Actually, science does know what causes SOME cancers. Science does not 
> know what causes ALL cancers.
> 
> 
>>
>> A modulating factor? maybe. But like all combustion products sucking 
>> in a lot of them is not a good idea. But you scammers never say cut 
>> back on pollution, you all say cut back on CO2 which is of unproven 
>> effect.
> 
> **Wrong. CO2 is a known greenhouse gas.

Libs never do quantity. Trevor says "if one life is saved it is worth 
it" Doesn't matter if a million die as a result. Libs pretend it's all 
the same. The Questions dear dumbass, is not whether CO2 IS a greenhouse 
gas but rather how much effect it has. Science says it's a MINOR 
greenhouse gas of little effect. Science is about measurements and 
quantity. This is why you know no science at all, press boy.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680451

On 4/8/2018 11:10 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote:
>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science
>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming.
>>>
>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj.
>>>
>>> *snicker*
>>>
>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for
>> people dead! You all need to be banned!
>>
>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who
>> smoked their whole life who don't have it.
> 
> 
> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". 

wrong.  Tobacco companies were sued and lost because tobacco causes cancer.

> SMOKING tobacco products
> increases one's risk of acquiring a smoking related disease. That
> includes a variety of cancers.

in your own words; "increasing ones risk of getting cancer is causing
cancer".

Tobacco and Marijuana, both cause cancer, pot causes bipolar
personalities in teenagers.



> 
>  It's funny that science
>> doesn't know what "causes" cancer but you libs and your fantasies do.
> 
> **Actually, science does know what causes SOME cancers. Science does not
> know what causes ALL cancers.
> 
> 
>>
>> A modulating factor? maybe. But like all combustion products sucking
>> in a lot of them is not a good idea. But you scammers never say cut
>> back on pollution, you all say cut back on CO2 which is of unproven
>> effect.
> 
> **Wrong. CO2 is a known greenhouse gas.
> 
> 
>  You
>> libs always leave a wide swath of destruction everywhere your
>> stupidity scorches the earth.
> 
> **There you go again: Displaying your stupidity for all to see.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680471 — Air causes cancer.

> > **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer". 
> 
> wrong.  Tobacco companies were sued 
> and lost because tobacco causes cancer.

Air causes cancer; breath too much of it, and you're dead.

Cocaine caused the AIDS epidemic, I think;
cocaine and coffee wear down the immune system.

For liability reasons, doctors _must_ treat cancer,
even when they know that the cancer might be dormant,
depending on the immune system.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680510 — Re: Air causes cancer.

On 4/9/2018 1:54 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer".
>>
>> wrong.  Tobacco companies were sued
>> and lost because tobacco causes cancer.
> 
> Air causes cancer; breath too much of it, and you're dead.
> 
> Cocaine caused the AIDS epidemic, I think;
> cocaine and coffee wear down the immune system.
> 
> For liability reasons, doctors _must_ treat cancer,
> even when they know that the cancer might be dormant,
> depending on the immune system.
> 
So that means that all doctors MUST treat all smokers, former smokers, 
and people who have been exposed to secondary smoke! Wow! This is WAY 
better than ObamaCare! Hey you know I used to smoke. Wait till I tell my 
doctor he MUST treat me.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680491

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:05:02 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

>Tobacco and Marijuana, both cause cancer, pot causes bipolar
>personalities in teenagers.


Bullshit, proof please.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680493

On 4/9/2018 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:05:02 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> 
>> Tobacco and Marijuana, both cause cancer, pot causes bipolar
>> personalities in teenagers.
> 
> 
> Bullshit, proof please.
> 

this was known at least 10 years ago in all the mental health circles,
and affects teens the most, many for a lifetime, have them avoid it as
long as possable.  I think it makes about 1 in 5 teens bipolar/manic
depending how often how strong, and how young.
If your over 60, who cares ? they will blame it on old age....

it is well known, the kookNorml sites will dis it. Because there is BIG
money to be made, especially in the Democratic States.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811144/

https://psychcentral.com/news/2015/03/15/how-cannabis-affects-bipolar-disorder/82314.html

https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/marijuana-addiction/marijuana-bipolar-can-marijuana-cause-bipolar/

https://www.mentalhelp.net/blogs/marijuana-makes-it-worse-severe-mental-illnesses/

In other words, we now know that cannabis consumption and mania are
linked; it doesn’t necessarily means that one causes another, but that’s
definitely possible. The research also showed that in people already
suffering from mania, the symptoms are greatly exacerbated.



and the other street drugs are bad. Meth is very bad, even Medical Meth.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680494

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:29:49 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

>On 4/9/2018 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:05:02 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Tobacco and Marijuana, both cause cancer, pot causes bipolar
>>> personalities in teenagers.
>> 
>> 
>> Bullshit, proof please.
>> 
>
>this was known at least 10 years ago in all the mental health circles,
>and affects teens the most, many for a lifetime, have them avoid it as
>long as possable.  I think it makes about 1 in 5 teens bipolar/manic
>depending how often how strong, and how young.
>If your over 60, who cares ? they will blame it on old age....
>
>it is well known, the kookNorml sites will dis it. Because there is BIG
>money to be made, especially in the Democratic States.
>
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811144/
>
>https://psychcentral.com/news/2015/03/15/how-cannabis-affects-bipolar-disorder/82314.html
>
>https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/marijuana-addiction/marijuana-bipolar-can-marijuana-cause-bipolar/
>
>https://www.mentalhelp.net/blogs/marijuana-makes-it-worse-severe-mental-illnesses/
>
>In other words, we now know that cannabis consumption and mania are
>linked; it doesn’t necessarily means that one causes another, but that’s
>definitely possible. The research also showed that in people already
>suffering from mania, the symptoms are greatly exacerbated.
>

So many people smke dope these day that you can claim many symtoms on
it. I been smoking it for 45 years with no probs..
.<hey! what was that? nevermind>
>
>
>and the other street drugs are bad. Meth is very bad, even Medical Meth.


So true, TINMM

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680515

On 4/9/2018 2:33 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:29:49 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/9/2018 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:05:02 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Tobacco and Marijuana, both cause cancer, pot causes bipolar
>>>> personalities in teenagers.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bullshit, proof please.
>>>
>>
>> this was known at least 10 years ago in all the mental health circles,
>> and affects teens the most, many for a lifetime, have them avoid it as
>> long as possable.  I think it makes about 1 in 5 teens bipolar/manic
>> depending how often how strong, and how young.
>> If your over 60, who cares ? they will blame it on old age....
>>
>> it is well known, the kookNorml sites will dis it. Because there is BIG
>> money to be made, especially in the Democratic States.
>>
>> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811144/
>>
>> https://psychcentral.com/news/2015/03/15/how-cannabis-affects-bipolar-disorder/82314.html
>>
>> https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/marijuana-addiction/marijuana-bipolar-can-marijuana-cause-bipolar/
>>
>> https://www.mentalhelp.net/blogs/marijuana-makes-it-worse-severe-mental-illnesses/
>>
>> In other words, we now know that cannabis consumption and mania are
>> linked; it doesn’t necessarily means that one causes another, but that’s
>> definitely possible. The research also showed that in people already
>> suffering from mania, the symptoms are greatly exacerbated.
>>
> 
> So many people smke dope these day that you can claim many symtoms on
> it. I been smoking it for 45 years with no probs..
> .<hey! what was that? nevermind>

yea, I think the warnings are out for the adolescents while brain is
growing, and its chemestry is changing on  about 20% of them, doesnt
seem to effect the other 80%, or affect older people over 30, except for
the smoke in the lungs thing that they will find out about in a few
years.   Alcohol is addictive to about 20% of the population, the other
80% not so much.  then there is the addictive internet, electronic
games, gambleing, and FaceBook.... for some,  kids and cellphones...



>>
>>
>> and the other street drugs are bad. Meth is very bad, even Medical Meth.
> 
> 
> So true, TINMM
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680812

Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:33:47 -0600, Skeeter wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:29:49 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
> 
>>On 4/9/2018 2:12 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:05:02 -0500, Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Tobacco and Marijuana, both cause cancer, pot causes bipolar
>>>> personalities in teenagers.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bullshit, proof please.
>>> 
>>> 
>>this was known at least 10 years ago in all the mental health circles,
>>and affects teens the most, many for a lifetime, have them avoid it as
>>long as possable.  I think it makes about 1 in 5 teens bipolar/manic
>>depending how often how strong, and how young.
>>If your over 60, who cares ? they will blame it on old age....
>>
>>it is well known, the kookNorml sites will dis it. Because there is BIG
>>money to be made, especially in the Democratic States.
>>
>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811144/
>>
>>https://psychcentral.com/news/2015/03/15/how-cannabis-affects-bipolar-
disorder/82314.html
>>
>>https://www.therecoveryvillage.com/marijuana-addiction/marijuana-bipolar-
can-marijuana-cause-bipolar/
>>
>>https://www.mentalhelp.net/blogs/marijuana-makes-it-worse-severe-mental-
illnesses/
>>
>>In other words, we now know that cannabis consumption and mania are
>>linked; it doesn’t necessarily means that one causes another, but that’s
>>definitely possible. The research also showed that in people already
>>suffering from mania, the symptoms are greatly exacerbated.
>>
>>
> So many people smke dope these day that you can claim many symtoms on
> it. I been smoking it for 45 years with no probs..

Are you sure? I mean, the way you spend some days frantically hammering on 
the "check for new messages" button, then chasing kensi around and leaping 
up to try to mate with her leg ... that doesn't seem a *teensy* bit manic 
to you?

<snicker>

-- 
FNVWe Nadegda

Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct
question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680867

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:45:25 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:


<...>

>Are you sure? I mean, the way you (Skeeter) spend some days frantically hammering on 
>the "check for new messages" button, then chasing kensi around and leaping 
>up to try to mate with her leg ... that doesn't seem a *teensy* bit manic 
>to you?
>
><snicker>

Nads  =  1
Skeet  =  0


-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680869

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 16:46:52 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq."
<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:

>On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:45:25 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>
>
><...>
>
>>Are you sure? I mean, the way you (Skeeter) spend some days frantically hammering on 
>>the "check for new messages" button, then chasing kensi around and leaping 
>>up to try to mate with her leg ... that doesn't seem a *teensy* bit manic 
>>to you?
>>
>><snicker>
>
>Nads  =  1
>Skeet  =  0


Gerg give nads a reach around

Nads-0
Gerg-0
Skeeter-1

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680912

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <nm8vcd9fik0tr4kjq5i65ifflocukc5s3l@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> 
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:45:25 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> 
> 
> <...>
> 
> >Are you sure? I mean, the way you (Skeeter) spend some days frantically hammering on 
> >the "check for new messages" button, then chasing kensi around and leaping 
> >up to try to mate with her leg ... that doesn't seem a *teensy* bit manic 
> >to you?
> >
> ><snicker>
> 
> Nads  =  1
> Skeet  =  0
Greg = SLURP!

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681021

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:11:06 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:


<...>
>> Nads  =  1
>> Skeet  =  0
>Greg = SLURP!
Checky  =  a Skeeter reach around!

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681022

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:11:04 -0400, "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq."
<greghall@yacht_maester.fake> wrote:

>On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 20:11:06 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
><...>
>>> Nads  =  1
>>> Skeet  =  0
>>Greg = SLURP!
>Checky  =  a Skeeter reach around!


somebody jellus

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681098

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <l9h2ddh6odbcj3qcbf0mjd9cdtlvi003to@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


> <...>
> >> Nads  =  1
> >> Skeet  =  0
> >Greg = SLURP!
> Checky  =  a Skeeter reach around!
Greg = Butthurt!

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681132

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 21:31:02 -0700, Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> wrote:
>In article <l9h2ddh6odbcj3qcbf0mjd9cdtlvi003to@4ax.com>, greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...

>
>> <...>
>> >> Nads  =  1
>> >> Skeet  =  0
>> >Greg = SLURP!
>> Checky  =  a Skeeter reach around!
>Greg = Butthurt!
Checky  =  more ghay ideation

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680818

On 10/04/2018 2:05 AM, Sergio wrote:
> On 4/8/2018 11:10 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science
>>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming.
>>>>
>>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj.
>>>>
>>>> *snicker*
>>>>
>>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for
>>> people dead! You all need to be banned!
>>>
>>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who
>>> smoked their whole life who don't have it.
>>
>>
>> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer".
> 
> wrong.  Tobacco companies were sued and lost because tobacco causes cancer.

**Wrong. Tobacco does not cause cancer. CONSUMPTION of tobacco can lead 
to an increase in the likelihood that a human may develop a tobacco 
related cancer or some other tobacco related disease.

> 
>> SMOKING tobacco products
>> increases one's risk of acquiring a smoking related disease. That
>> includes a variety of cancers.
> 
> in your own words; "increasing ones risk of getting cancer is causing
> cancer".

**Those were YOUR words, ot mine.

> 
> Tobacco and Marijuana, both cause cancer, pot causes bipolar
> personalities in teenagers.

**Prove it.


> 
> 
> 
>>
>>   It's funny that science
>>> doesn't know what "causes" cancer but you libs and your fantasies do.
>>
>> **Actually, science does know what causes SOME cancers. Science does not
>> know what causes ALL cancers.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> A modulating factor? maybe. But like all combustion products sucking
>>> in a lot of them is not a good idea. But you scammers never say cut
>>> back on pollution, you all say cut back on CO2 which is of unproven
>>> effect.
>>
>> **Wrong. CO2 is a known greenhouse gas.
>>
>>
>>   You
>>> libs always leave a wide swath of destruction everywhere your
>>> stupidity scorches the earth.
>>
>> **There you go again: Displaying your stupidity for all to see.
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#680894

"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message 
news:fj7mk1FnuahU1@mid.individual.net...
> On 10/04/2018 2:05 AM, Sergio wrote:
>> On 4/8/2018 11:10 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science
>>>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj.
>>>>>
>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>
>>>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for
>>>> people dead! You all need to be banned!
>>>>
>>>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who
>>>> smoked their whole life who don't have it.
>>>
>>>
>>> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer".
>>
>> wrong.  Tobacco companies were sued and lost because tobacco causes 
>> cancer.
>
> **Wrong. Tobacco does not cause cancer. CONSUMPTION of tobacco can lead to 
> an increase in the likelihood that a human may develop a tobacco related 
> cancer or some other tobacco related disease.

Exactly, there is no evidence of causality, you merely have a correlation.

Might have nothing to due with tobacco at all but might be related to 
another issue entirely,.

 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#681103

On 4/12/2018 7:06 PM, Scout wrote:
> 
> 
> "Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
> news:fj7mk1FnuahU1@mid.individual.net...
>> On 10/04/2018 2:05 AM, Sergio wrote:
>>> On 4/8/2018 11:10 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>> On 9/04/2018 1:46 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:29 PM, kensi wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/8/2018 12:17 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> Still no proof cigarettes CAUSE cancer anymore than there is science
>>>>>>> that proves man-made CO2 causes global warming.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then you should smoke as many packs a day as you can afford, benj.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *snicker*
>>>>>>
>>>>> Gave up smoking years ago. You libs are always so violent wishing for
>>>>> people dead! You all need to be banned!
>>>>>
>>>>> If Tobacco "causes" cancer then why are there people 100 years old who
>>>>> smoked their whole life who don't have it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **Again: Tobacco does not "cause cancer".
>>>
>>> wrong.  Tobacco companies were sued and lost because tobacco causes
>>> cancer.
>>
>> **Wrong. Tobacco does not cause cancer. CONSUMPTION of tobacco can
>> lead to an increase in the likelihood that a human may develop a
>> tobacco related cancer or some other tobacco related disease.
> 
> Exactly, there is no evidence of causality, you merely have a correlation.
> 
> Might have nothing to due with tobacco at all but might be related to
> another issue entirely,.
> 
> 
> 

     like inhaling smoke of *burning tobacco leaves* causes higher rates
 of cancer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 10  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web