Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #680176 > unrolled thread
| Started by | kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400 |
| Last post | 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700 |
| Articles | 11 on this page of 191 — 28 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 09:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-07 11:23 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 10:33 -0500
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 12:05 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 17:51 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 18:26 -0700
" Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-07 20:40 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 20:52 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2018-04-07 21:00 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-08 04:05 +0000
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:07 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 21:06 -0700
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-08 07:24 +0200
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-08 11:54 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: " Repent, The End is Near, I personally guarantee it ! " -- K. Kensington. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-07 11:43 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-07 12:52 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Just Wondering <JustWondering@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-07 11:58 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:55 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-09 21:10 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 06:40 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-11 19:24 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 19:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:13 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-15 08:48 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:19 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-08 16:54 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 09:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 11:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 11:22 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 12:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-08 12:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:10 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:28 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:32 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0500
Air causes cancer. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:54 -0700
Re: Air causes cancer. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:29 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:12 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 14:29 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-09 13:33 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:45 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-12 16:46 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-12 15:03 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-12 20:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-14 11:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-14 09:18 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-14 21:31 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-15 12:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-12 10:12 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Scout" <me4guns@removethis.this2.spam.centurylink.net> - 2018-04-12 20:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-15 00:48 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-15 18:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:58 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 02:00 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 19:11 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:57 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 07:17 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:44 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-17 14:08 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 11:35 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-17 17:55 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 06:00 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 22:40 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-18 09:15 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:03 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 19:32 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 01:36 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-17 22:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:01 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:33 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 11:21 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-18 16:02 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-18 18:49 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-19 23:39 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 16:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-20 12:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-16 08:34 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 09:59 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 13:09 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:17 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 11:29 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:13 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 13:20 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:33 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:45 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:11 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-17 01:34 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 13:04 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:07 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 16:59 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 22:31 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 15:46 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 20:50 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:46 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 05:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:14 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 12:47 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-16 14:43 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Jews <jews@world-doomination.org> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:27 +0000
Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-16 15:25 -0700
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 21:51 -0500
Re: Al Gore fangirl, "kensi", taps out. Your Friendly Neighbourhood Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2018-04-16 22:24 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2018-04-18 00:22 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-04-18 05:21 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 13:37 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-18 14:55 -0600
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-18 23:48 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-18 18:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-19 11:44 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-04-19 18:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 11:06 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-18 11:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 12:20 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-16 19:14 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-16 14:56 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-16 17:13 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-09 04:33 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 06:17 +1000
Does smoking cause cancer? (was: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 01:43 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 09:57 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 02:02 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 10:12 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:36 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2018-04-09 03:45 +0200
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:50 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-08 20:12 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 11:40 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-08 23:56 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-09 14:05 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 11:27 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:01 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:09 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-10 08:34 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:51 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 11:52 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:22 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 07:36 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 17:13 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:23 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 19:43 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 11:02 +1000
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:58 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:40 -0400
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:08 -0500
Re: Does smoking cause cancer? Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 12:40 +1000
Ben Jacoby is neither funny nor informative, nothing good. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 19:54 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-08 19:34 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> - 2018-04-09 10:52 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 07:59 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-09 11:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 13:36 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-09 17:34 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-09 16:58 -0500
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 The Equalizer <coming4you@never.invalid.net> - 2018-04-09 22:58 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Checkmate <ricksabian1@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 17:39 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)" <rjac@TheWor1d.com> - 2018-04-09 13:05 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson") <fsturluogh5@gmail.com> - 2018-04-09 21:27 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 @ "Michael Ejercito" <mejercit@hotmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:27 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-04-10 11:25 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) - 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600
In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> - 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-07 22:41 -0700
Re: A Shell report predicted how devastating climate change would be, back in 1988 James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
| From | onion@anon.invalid (Mr On!on) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 16:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nn1vz4.1k5u7nw13ketsdN%onion@anon.invalid> |
| In reply to | #680603 |
Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) mewed... > >Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > >["kensi"] > > > >> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. > >> > >> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. > >> > >> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> > > > >That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. > > He gets zero thanks from Yours Truly. Why? Because he > posted a link and was too lazy and rude to summarize the > contents so those of us who *might* be interested at > least had an inkling whether or not it was worth logging > on. > > Why do so many on Usenet act like commensalism is de > rigueur? The only benefit of Ejercito's post is to himself. > He apparently likes to hear himself talk but is less than > percipient. > <https://imgflip.com/i/283non> -- \|/ (((ร))) U+97F1 Wearing an On!on on his belt, which was the style at the time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | % <persent@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 08:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b6fc1k.rd8.17.5@news.alt.net> |
| In reply to | #680608 |
On 2018-04-10 8:48 AM, Mr On!on wrote: > Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) mewed... >>> Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> ["kensi"] >>> >>>> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. >>>> >>>> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. >>>> >>>> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> >>> >>> That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. >> >> He gets zero thanks from Yours Truly. Why? Because he >> posted a link and was too lazy and rude to summarize the >> contents so those of us who *might* be interested at >> least had an inkling whether or not it was worth logging >> on. >> >> Why do so many on Usenet act like commensalism is de >> rigueur? The only benefit of Ejercito's post is to himself. >> He apparently likes to hear himself talk but is less than >> percipient. >> > > <https://imgflip.com/i/283non> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ-4cKFVC34
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 16:58 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1nn1wgb.nhbpm717qjft5N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #680610 |
% <persent@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2018-04-10 8:48 AM, Mr On!on wrote: > > Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) mewed... > >>> Michael Ejercito <mejercit@hotmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> ["kensi"] > >>> > >>>> She has no credibility on these newsgroups. > >>>> > >>>> Jeff Jacoby has plenty of credibility. > >>>> > >>>> <http://www.jeffjacoby.com/20620/the-blessings-of-climate-change> > >>> > >>> That's an interesting, well-balanced article, thanks for the link. > >>> > >> > >> He gets zero thanks from Yours Truly. Why? Because he > >> posted a link and was too lazy and rude to summarize the > >> contents so those of us who *might* be interested at > >> least had an inkling whether or not it was worth logging > >> on. > >> > >> Why do so many on Usenet act like commensalism is de > >> rigueur? The only benefit of Ejercito's post is to himself. > >> He apparently likes to hear himself talk but is less than > >> percipient. > >> > > > > <https://imgflip.com/i/283non> > > > > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJ-4cKFVC34> > Right on, lol. -- ^ร^. Sn!pe <snipeco.1@gmail.com> My pet rock Gordon just is.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 23:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pam6pr$7h4$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680436 |
Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:59:02 -0700, pedophile wrote: > On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:52:03 -0400, circumcised pro-semitic cunt kensi > <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: > >>On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: >> >>[snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] >> >>Keep up the good work! >> >>> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >>> attempting to establish what you actually believe. >> >>There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types >>like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and >>Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query >>those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, >>nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. >> >>Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with >>maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true self-managed >>ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is apparent when (as >>always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions and >>empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). >> >>See: >>https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ >> >>"They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their >>beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things >>out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events >>indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to >>change." >> >>(emphasis added) > > STFU cunt. [improperly delimited .sig deleted] Hi, kooky. I've mostly been ignoring you lately, because, frankly, you're boring. But you mostly keep to your own threads. I find it interesting that you felt the need to pop into this one to froth at kensi. Duck that quacks the loudest is the one that got shot? <snicker> -- FNVWe Nadegda Fakey couldn't teach a monkey to eat a banana, much less answer a direct question posed to him. -- Fakey's Dogwhistle Holder
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 17:53 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <pu7tcdpk9892kuoprccuk98rslnluugrid@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #680813 |
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018 23:47:07 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote: >Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt! >On Mon, 09 Apr 2018 07:59:02 -0700, pedophile wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:52:03 -0400, circumcised pro-semitic cunt kensi >> <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> wrote: >> >>>On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: >>> >>>[snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] >>> >>>Keep up the good work! >>> >>>> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >>>> attempting to establish what you actually believe. >>> >>>There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types >>>like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and >>>Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query >>>those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, >>>nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. >>> >>>Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with >>>maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true self-managed >>>ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is apparent when (as >>>always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions and >>>empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). >>> >>>See: >>>https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ >>> >>>"They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their >>>beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things >>>out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events >>>indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to >>>change." >>> >>>(emphasis added) >> >> STFU cunt. >[improperly delimited .sig deleted] > >Hi, kooky. I've mostly been ignoring you lately, because, frankly, you're >boring. But you mostly keep to your own threads. I find it interesting >that you felt the need to pop into this one to froth at kensi. > >Duck that quacks the loudest is the one that got shot? > ><snicker> Dead ducks don't quack. now run along little one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-09 10:04 -0700 |
| Subject | In some Turkish bazar, somewhere... |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.9--10.04am.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #680435 |
> [ Trumpettes don't think for themselves ]
In some Turkish bazar, somewhere:
kensi: Disarm everyone.
Trump: Arm everyone.
kensi: Nationalize everything.
Trump: Privatize.
kensi: You're nuts.
Trump: Read "Art of the Deal".
kensi: Repent, the end is near.
Trump: Now you're talking, Padawan.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 08:14 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <fj26ukFgjv3U2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #680435 |
On 10/04/2018 12:52 AM, kensi wrote: > On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: > > [snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] > > Keep up the good work! > >> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >> attempting to establish what you actually believe. > > There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types > like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and > Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query > those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, > nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. > > Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with > maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true self-managed > ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is apparent when (as > always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions and > empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). > > See: > https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ > > "They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their > beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things > out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events > indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to > change." > > (emphasis added) > **That answers a lot of questions. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-10 04:53 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <HY_yC.43400$6_2.35103@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #680524 |
On 4/9/2018 6:14 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: > On 10/04/2018 12:52 AM, kensi wrote: >> On 4/8/2018 4:17 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>> On 9/04/2018 2:17 AM, benj wrote: >> >> [snip most of epic SPNAKage of ko0ky benj] >> >> Keep up the good work! >> >>> **It has nothing to do with grammar and everything to do with >>> attempting to establish what you actually believe. >> >> There's no such thing as "what benj actually believes". High-RWA types >> like him outsource ontological queries to the likes of Fox News and >> Breitbart, rather than build their own in-house ontologies and query >> those. He quite literally does not *have* a worldview. Nor does Trump, >> nor do the lot of them. It's part of what makes them such kOoks. >> >> Instead they have external "fonts of truth(iness)" on speed-dial, with >> maybe some internal caching. But this caching isn't a true >> self-managed ontology, because they do no gardening of it, as is >> apparent when (as always) it ends up being a mass of contradictions >> and empirically-invalidated nonsense (such as climate change denial). >> >> See: >> https://theauthoritarians.org/donald-trump-and-authoritarian-followers/ >> >> "They are highly dogmatic. Because /they have mainly gotten their >> beliefs from the authorities in their lives, rather than think things >> out for themselves/, they have no real defense when facts or events >> indicate they are wrong. So they just dig in their heels and refuse to >> change." >> >> (emphasis added) >> > > **That answers a lot of questions. > Pro propagandists Trevor and "kensi" stroke and support each other. Propaganda 101.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "max headroom" <maximusheadroom@gmx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-07 07:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <paamas$8mg$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #680176 |
In news:paakrs$1fn6$1@gioia.aioe.org, kensi <kkensington01@gmail.nospam.invalid> typed: > A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that > the company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would > be. ... The report, titled "The Greenhouse Effect," said the effects > of climate change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early > 21st: > https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ <yawn>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-07 22:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <969edc98-23ca-4142-8971-0a50dc252361@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #680176 |
On Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 7:33:37 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that the > company knew This is a retarded claim. Even now global warming is just a strained conjecture. How did somebody know then what we are only guessing at now. Global warming groupies are the dumbest of the dumbl
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-11 10:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <0170fc7c-e277-4fe0-807f-30958a4342bc@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #680176 |
On Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 7:33:37 AM UTC-7, kensi wrote: > A 1988 Royal Dutch Shell report recently published online shows that the > company knew decades ago what the impact of climate change would be. ... > The report, titled โThe Greenhouse Effect,โ said the effects of climate > change would be notable by the late 20th Century and early 21st: > > https://globalnews.ca/news/4127757/shell-climate-change-report-1988/ > > -- > "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain > the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks > "I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade > in here." ~Checkmate What impact? Only envirowhackos claim to see any impact.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 10 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web