Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #681111 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2018-04-15 06:22 -0700 |
| Last post | 2018-04-18 15:55 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 101 — 11 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 06:22 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-15 15:07 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-15 17:31 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 04:34 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-16 12:43 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 13:20 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 22:37 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 05:16 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 12:47 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2018-04-16 20:05 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-16 21:50 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 05:22 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 06:16 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 06:29 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 14:54 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 10:18 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 17:52 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 11:36 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 18:51 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 19:07 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 13:11 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 20:34 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 20:55 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 14:18 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:43 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 15:03 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 22:34 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 22:41 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 15:56 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 23:20 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 17:31 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-17 18:07 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 01:14 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 23:29 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 23:38 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-18 17:23 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 10:55 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-18 20:15 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 13:51 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 00:21 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 17:37 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-19 02:14 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 22:31 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 12:17 -0500
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 14:07 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-19 14:45 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 14:59 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-19 15:06 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 03:11 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 20:31 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-19 20:39 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 05:35 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 06:11 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-20 07:35 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-20 15:28 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 21:26 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-20 14:55 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 04:20 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 06:03 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-21 14:17 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-21 18:17 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-21 18:47 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-21 14:05 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 12:26 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-18 21:25 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 15:02 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-19 01:37 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 18:44 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-19 02:23 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 22:38 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-20 01:16 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 19:34 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-20 02:43 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 19:56 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 03:35 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 15:13 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 15:24 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 15:45 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-19 02:10 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-19 01:46 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 19:04 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-19 02:29 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 12:00 -0500
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 23:41 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-18 17:26 +0000
Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-17 15:20 -0700
Re: Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-17 20:05 -0400
No "Bible" is the final word. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2018-04-17 17:31 -0700
Re: No "Bible" is the final word. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-04-18 10:57 -0400
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 19:01 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:41 -0500
Re: Binary Black Holes Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 14:54 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-17 18:51 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes grahamcooper7@gmail.com - 2018-04-17 15:19 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-16 22:02 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes sam.wormley@gmail.com - 2018-04-17 18:31 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-04-17 19:29 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 21:54 -0500
Re: Binary Black Holes john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 23:48 -0700
Re: Binary Black Holes moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2018-04-18 17:28 +0000
Re: Binary Black Holes mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-04-18 15:55 -0700
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 19:04 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9b5d26cf-0285-4a2a-811d-3bf9aacb0f11@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681630 |
MM “Or it may be because LeSage gravity is just plain wrong. What a concept! Imagine that! LeSage gravity wrong!! ” Lots of people are now rejecting the Suck Gravity Black Holes Dark Matter joke, so, no. It’s the only logical answer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-19 02:29 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb8utd$jpq$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681631 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >"Or it may be because LeSage gravity is just plain wrong. >What a concept! Imagine that! LeSage gravity wrong!! " >Lots of people are now rejecting the Suck Gravity Black Holes Dark Matter joke, >so, no. Lots of people? Who? Any of them scientists? What, none of them? OK! > It's the only logical answer. Here we go again. Mysterious "John Logic", which you can't explain. All we know about "John Logic" is that it is completely illogical.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-19 12:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <pbai02$14k0$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681631 |
On 4/18/18 9:04 PM, john wrote: > MM > “Or it may be because LeSage gravity is just plain wrong. > > What a concept! Imagine that! LeSage gravity wrong!! ” > > Lots of people are now rejecting the Suck Gravity Black Holes Dark Matter joke, Physicists? Or hacks? Citations or vague assertion about rejection of "suck gravity"? > so, > no. It’s the only logical answer. > -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 23:41 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ac4693c8-5d01-4925-adaf-f31144a65a1f@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681448 |
MM Thanks again, MM. And you too, Odd!!! You guys REALLY HELP me!! I'll give you credit in my book- well, not you Odd because you're a nym
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 17:26 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb7v4g$os$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681502 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >Thanks again, MM. >And you too, Odd!!! >You guys REALLY HELP me!! >I'll give you credit in my book- well, not you Odd because you're a nym Book? I think "writing a book" is one of the steps in the advance of kookdom. Seto has already (properly) written a book that has sold something like two copies, and Archie Pu thinks that babbling here is "writing a book".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 15:20 -0700 |
| Subject | Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.17--3.20pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #681430 |
13.8 billion years ago, the known universe had no volume; entropy transformed it into what we see today; gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 20:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. |
| Message-ID | <TYvBC.546$z83.323@fx19.iad> |
| In reply to | #681434 |
On 4/17/2018 6:20 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: > 13.8 billion years ago, the known universe had no volume; > entropy transformed it into what we see today; > gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. > Religious dogma and of course, total fantasy and wrong. BB is bogus, Rolf.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 17:31 -0700 |
| Subject | No "Bible" is the final word. |
| Message-ID | <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.17--5.31pm.Seattle.2018> |
| In reply to | #681455 |
> > 13.8 billion years ago, the known universe had no volume; > > entropy transformed it into what we see today; > > gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. > > Religious dogma and, of course, total fantasy, and wrong. > BB is bogus, Rolf. Forget the BB, I'm talking about entropy... natural, spontaneous dissipation/evaporation. There's a million ways to do things "wrong", and comparatively few ways to do it "right"... ...and no "Bible" is the final word.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <benj@nobody.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 10:57 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: No "Bible" is the final word. |
| Message-ID | <%1JBC.23650$DS3.20467@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #681457 |
On 4/17/2018 8:31 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote: >>> 13.8 billion years ago, the known universe had no volume; >>> entropy transformed it into what we see today; >>> gravity is the "memory" of where the stuff was. >> >> Religious dogma and, of course, total fantasy, and wrong. >> BB is bogus, Rolf. > > Forget the BB, I'm talking about entropy... > natural, spontaneous dissipation/evaporation. > > There's a million ways to do things "wrong", > and comparatively few ways to do it "right"... > ...and no "Bible" is the final word. > No matter what you've seen on the internet, the opinion of people like you is certainly not the final word on anything. In science, reality is the final word. Opinions mean nothing. Obviously you've been sold the religious doctrine that Entropy is increasing. Steam engine thermodynamics. It's a new age Rolf. Textbooks no matter what Odd tells you are not the "final word" on anything. Go for conservation of Entropy. That is imperial thinking. Nobel level stuff. Maybe even two. Oh ya!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 19:01 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb5ga3$2q2$2@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681369 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >"MM >" >John, don't you know it's extremely rude to scoop crap from your butt and >fling it into this group like that? Stop it! " >You don't like thinking, do you Michael? " >Remember when you threw shit at me every day the whole six months I was >figuring out how Benzene could be constructed, using the 1:2 pathway? Well, yeah, I remember telling you what you were doing was a lost cause, since it involved accelerating radiating charges, assorted false assumptions of yours and so forth. > http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/BenzeneE.GIF And I was correct. You wasted 6 months on a lost cause. >Notice how SYMMETRICAL it is? Not too hard since you started out with a symmetrical benzene molecule. All you had to do to keep symmetry was to treat every carbon/hydrogen pair identically and not lose the existing symmetry. At least I see you succeeded with that. But as Odd pointed out, you messed up on the symmetry with your attempt with methane. (plus that little radiation issue...) >Every carbon-carbon interaction is the same sequence: >Yellow left up Green right down Red left up No transfer Yellow right up Green left down Red right up No transfer >Repeat >Turned out incredibly good, Michael. You were urging me to QUIT GIVE UP QUIT GIVE UP the whole time. I don't like people wasting time on lost causes. You didn't listen to me, unfortunately. You came up with an animated gif which CANNOT represent benzene. >But I didn't, Michael. You know why? Because who would listen to you? > And why would they? >Nobody. No reason to. All you do is throw shit. Don't project. You are the one throwing shit in here. Anyway, nobody has to listen to me since I am not trying to invent a kooky broken physics theory and pass it off as reality here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 21:41 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <4ltcdddpnu1sr5ffptt5rphqq2l65lhtfn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681369 |
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:29:38 -0700 (PDT), john wrote: > http://users.accesscomm.ca/sefton/BenzeneE.GIF I just had a look at this. It's a 2D projection of a the 3D version of the sort of arithmetic we use to make Spirograph patterns for cute screen-savers. It is pretty, but has no physical significance. -- Goat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 14:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb51rm$7fu$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #681367 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: > MM > " > John, don't you know it's extremely rude to scoop crap from your butt and > fling it into this group like that? Stop it! " > > You don't like thinking, do you Michael? > I hate to say this, John, but you’re not very good at thinking. You have trouble working through ideas you can’t visualize. You have trouble following long reading passages. You can’t do math with any reliability, nor are you able to learn any skills in that area. You have a bunch of beliefs that you can neither defend nor abandon. When hard data conflicts with your conclusions, you lock up and can’t find another path. Before you try to put yourself above others as a “thinking man”, you should probably come to terms with your rather restrictive limitations. -- Odd Bodkin -- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 18:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb5fmk$2q2$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681367 |
john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: >MM >" >John, don't you know it's extremely rude to scoop crap from your butt and >fling it into this group like that? Stop it! " >You don't like thinking, do you Michael? Well you certainly don't. What I see is you mindlessly driven by your spinny thing OCD reposting crap about precessing spinny things that were refuted long ago. You won't read physics books and think.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | grahamcooper7@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 15:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <90050746-acec-47e4-847f-097eb268c7e4@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681351 |
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 2:50:54 PM UTC+10, john wrote: > Graham > "- hide quoted text - > On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 11:22:37 PM UTC+10, john wrote: > > Combine with the high energy particles shot out in jets when dead stars get shredded and EJECTED from the central black hole. > > To form new stars. > > There. That's the whole cycle. > > > > Odd > > Small black holes dont eject anything. > > Read Hertzbrand Russell Diagram for life cycle of STARS " > No. > Old stars orbit faster as they get closer to the central black hole, until they shred and jet immediately form at right angles to the disc. These jets are observed to play a part in new star formation. This new observation of binary black Holes makes me think that they also play a part in new star formation. ARTISTS CONCEPT! http://www.atnf.csiro.au/outreach/education/senior/astrophysics/images/stellarevolution/blackholeartistsjpg.jpg IF this happens at all, its still too rare to be a central part of new star formation. A few thousand SUPERNOVAS remnants is sufficient to collapse under its own gravity in a GALACTIC SPIRAL ARM see: STELLAR NURSERY
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-16 22:02 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <pb3v4u$dqf$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #681344 |
On 4/16/2018 8:05 PM, grahamcooper7@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 11:22:37 PM UTC+10, john wrote: >> Combine with the high energy particles shot out in jets when dead stars get shredded and EJECTED from the central black hole. >> To form new stars. >> There. That's the whole cycle. >> >> Odd > > Small black holes dont eject anything. They should still have singularities. > > Read Hertzbrand Russell Diagram for life cycle of STARS > >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | sam.wormley@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 18:31 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a22a8748-4f50-4cab-afee-290b284b3c54@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681111 |
My Recent Lecture on the subject. http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Lecture.20180417/index.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | pnalsing@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 19:29 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <c9b06fbd-f25a-48a4-89f5-acf258477e83@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681470 |
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 6:31:17 PM UTC-7, sam.w...@gmail.com wrote: > My Recent Lecture on the subject. > http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Lecture.20180417/index.html Well, Sam, how cool is that? Nice job, very informative. I appreciate your efforts!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lofty Goat <rlwatkins@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 21:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <sbcdddh6je0iuu9ln156fj1b9d41le7itc@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #681470 |
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 18:31:13 -0700 (PDT), sam.wormley@gmail.com wrote: > >My Recent Lecture on the subject. >http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Lecture.20180417/index.html Neato. -- Goat / RLW
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-17 23:48 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <71c8c1f8-79fe-40e9-939e-2e28e98af7a5@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #681470 |
Sam!! Nice to hear from you!!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-04-18 17:28 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <pb7v7v$os$3@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #681470 |
sam.wormley@gmail.com writes: >My Recent Lecture on the subject. >http://edu-observatory.org/olli/Lecture.20180417/index.html Very good, well done. Welcome back, Sam, long time no hear. You were one of the few sane ones here.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web