Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #569572 > unrolled thread
| Started by | john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-10 17:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2016-04-14 12:38 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 145 — 15 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 17:20 -0700
Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 03:27 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:12 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 06:21 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:19 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:24 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-11 08:22 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:34 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 21:05 +0000
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 16:23 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-11 17:40 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:06 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:08 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:31 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-12 14:11 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 16:54 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:16 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 20:50 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-12 23:16 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 03:38 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:45 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-14 01:01 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 01:05 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 04:49 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-14 14:31 +0000
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 13:45 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-14 18:33 +0000
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 03:16 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 04:27 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:57 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-14 14:41 +0000
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 07:45 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 08:11 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 08:22 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 13:03 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:31 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 04:56 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-14 01:40 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 13:22 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 06:48 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 06:57 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 07:23 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 07:35 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 08:06 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 08:25 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 09:50 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 10:29 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:49 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:16 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:20 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:48 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:13 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:47 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:26 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-14 00:52 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 05:03 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 09:23 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:18 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:27 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-04-14 01:09 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 04:51 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:33 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:05 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 14:44 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 15:19 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 15:36 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 02:41 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 17:32 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 16:01 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 05:34 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:12 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-12 13:39 +0000
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:54 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 07:05 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 07:44 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:02 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-12 08:44 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 10:49 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 12:37 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:10 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 14:58 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-13 16:45 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 04:59 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 12:15 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 09:16 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 12:56 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:34 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 13:49 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 23:00 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:51 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 13:02 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 12:09 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-13 14:54 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 15:35 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 09:01 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-11 09:33 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 09:52 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-11 10:33 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:47 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:11 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:09 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:05 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 11:12 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 14:23 +0000
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:44 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 15:06 +0000
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-11 09:04 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 09:07 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 09:45 -0700
Gravity/eXergy evaporates away, never to return. HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:14 -0700
Re: Gravity/eXergy evaporates away, never to return. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:49 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-11 10:12 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:45 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:58 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 21:14 -0400
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 08:08 -0500
the box noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 16:07 -0700
Re: Gravity/eXergy evaporates away, never to return. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 18:32 +0000
Re: SpaceTime grows as the cosmos evaporates. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-11 21:29 +0000
Re: SpaceTime grows as the cosmos evaporates. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 21:17 -0400
Re: SpaceTime grows as the cosmos evaporates. Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2016-04-12 05:49 +0000
Re: I'm confident you'll continue to advertize my ideas. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-12 03:39 -0400
Re: I'm confident you'll continue to advertize my ideas. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-04-12 09:53 +0200
Re: I'm confident you'll continue to advertize my ideas. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-12 10:17 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 11:15 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 11:19 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 09:48 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 09:55 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:57 -0500
spatial (two p.t's noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:54 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:54 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 13:52 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-13 12:46 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:34 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 11:13 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 09:24 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 11:29 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 11:30 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 11:10 -0500
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-13 11:46 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 10:57 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-14 12:32 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-04-14 11:03 -0700
Re: Odd, explain equal universal acceleration "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-14 12:38 -0700
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 14:58 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <5FwPy.1197$Ur3.698@fx10.iad> |
| In reply to | #570176 |
On 04/13/2016 01:10 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 4/12/2016 2:37 PM, john wrote:
>> I don't see why
>> they wouldn't do a straight up trade:
>> DE for tired light.
>> Then the whole BB goes away
>>
>
> Tired light can't explain blueshifting. Only redshifting would be
> allowed. Unless you have some kind of 5-Hour Energy Drink for photons.
Oh Boinker. In a debate it's always this or that. In reality nature just
does what it does and does not need to "win" the debate.
Why do you want to trade tired light for Doppler rather than just add it?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 16:45 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <nemlhg$c78$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #569941 |
> Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote > an EXCELLENT post. It has wider applications. > It applies to every poster who is not a physicist > but especially to the loud mouths who brag to be > "autodidacts". It means that they have read some > articles, which gave them a fixed idea that fits > their emotional Weltbild, which they then attempt > to stuff down other folks throat... Jeff Relf, Porat, > Full Swine Glazier, rect-Al Schwartz, Ferkelson > Odd Boinker & Hellmutt Wabnigger practice that. > But they are always good for a laugh, n'est pas. > Take care Virdy -- -- hanson Virdy wrote: I hope, me m(y) fingers crossed, you Sir hanson, don't mean EXCELLENT for a change?! He he... Ha ha... Ferkelson does not belong on that list. Unless you mean someone other than Mark L. Fergerson. I realize you hanson and I don't always share the same friends, but for the most part, we somehow do. Do The Physics. I also like Yehiel Porat, Circulon Engineer for some circular reason. I can' explain it. > hanson wrote: Porat is not as bad as is the Ferkel. Porat at least stays in his "Abstract"... But the Ferkel insisted with parroting and echoing John Baez's assertion that Gold is yellow because of its relativistic electrons... despite the fact that one can buy, commercially, pure gold of any color that the rainbow has. When that was pointed out, Ferkel got nasty, like those autodidacts usually do. > > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>wrote: > > > Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > >Odd, who is the observer, in this case? > > >Are you saying that The Milky Way is > > >the Center of a fantastic expansion? > > >Yes, you are saying that. > > > Michael wrote: > > Where is Sam Wormley and his "No Center" post when you need it? > > > Virdy wrote: > A) Are you Michael Moroney incapable of searching for it yourself? > B) The count of Sam Worm Liars posts overwhelms your search engines? > C) Shouldn't you just be able to paraphrase all Sam's cut and pastes? > > > Michael wrote: > > On second thought, don't bother, Sam. John is too thick to understand > > it, > > he'll ignore it and then post some more "We must be the center!" crap, > > or whine how something on the diagonal of a grid recedes faster (just as > > expected) or something, Virdy wrote: Btw MM, Moron Smart or otherwise, we not only must be the center of The Universe, we actually are per the kooky we all live on a Yellow Submarine on the surface of fish(y) Cow, spherical by all diametrical measures. Schools can never make fools of all of us Us US. Axiomatically. What do I mean Moroney? If you had any actual real education at all, firstly your writing would reflect it, and you wouldn't hide it like do your cohorts HVAC, Odd Bodkin, ..., Sam Worm Liar. It's just too bad you all are well funded enough to use different distinct addressed IP servers. Your ignorable message remains the same. Now you know we know. We all can do the math to see with whom you agree or not. It's called reading. > Virdy wrote: > D) It's always just an either or for you Moroney? People can't simply > explore ideas that go against the grains of some mythical Status Quo > Scientists? Everyday, same scientists are shouting at the top of their > lungs how little they actually know about the Universe. Why is that? > E) Calling everyone else kooks or crazy or uneducated really merely > makes you Moron Smart. Keep up the facade around your house of cards. > > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: MM's posts' content is so predictable.” -- Mahipal “IPMM... Take care Sir hanson. Do cut down on them visuals.” > hanson wrote: Why?.. It's NOT me that is the Pervert. I merely report what they brag/ged about and have put on the web.... > That not only applies Full-Swine Glazier and his "under"study "Double Anon E. Mouse" but also to Sam Wormley whose visuals you did not object to even though Sam has not yet gotten off the fat one there in row 2: <http://tinyurl.com/CC-AG-warmed-Wormley> > Different stroke for & from different folks, eh... LOL .
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 04:59 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <98e34547-a234-4b29-ab65-2b4fc763c3c0@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #570303 |
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 7:46:04 PM UTC-4, hanson wrote: > > Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote > > an EXCELLENT post. It has wider applications. > > It applies to every poster who is not a physicist > > but especially to the loud mouths who brag to be > > "autodidacts". It means that they have read some > > articles, which gave them a fixed idea that fits > > their emotional Weltbild, which they then attempt > > to stuff down other folks throat... Jeff Relf, Porat, > > Full Swine Glazier, rect-Al Schwartz, Ferkelson > > Odd Boinker & Hellmutt Wabnigger practice that. > > But they are always good for a laugh, n'est pas. > > Take care Virdy -- -- hanson > > Virdy wrote: > I hope, me m(y) fingers crossed, you Sir hanson, don't mean EXCELLENT > for a change?! He he... Ha ha... > Ferkelson does not belong on that list. Unless you mean someone other > than Mark L. Fergerson. I realize you hanson and I don't always share the > same friends, but for the most part, we somehow do. Do The Physics. > I also like Yehiel Porat, Circulon Engineer for some circular reason. I can' > explain it. > > > hanson wrote: > Porat is not as bad as is the Ferkel. Porat at least stays in his > "Abstract"... But the Ferkel insisted with parroting and echoing > John Baez's assertion that Gold is yellow because of its > relativistic electrons... despite the fact that one can buy, > commercially, pure gold of any color that the rainbow has. > When that was pointed out, Ferkel got nasty, like those > autodidacts usually do. Don't get me started on John "Factor 2" Baez, who reads Usenet but his employment contract forbids him from interacting here anymore. Squared! Baez's imminent forced retirement can't be all that far away. Hi John! Btw, the only thing I know about gold Gold is that the(y)TheThem refuse to let me buy any based upon my CreditKarmaHistoryReports. No joke, BiggestData@#. We all have feelings and sensitivities, as you Sir hanson well know. Like autodidact wise genius Sir John Lennon sings: Give Mark A Chance... I sure hope Sir Mark does not have me in his killfiles lists! He he... I get it, Sir is one I minus the iApple SirI. Was I born yesterday?! Autodidactic I, also accept that Mark is not much into small talk. Me, I blah Blah BLAH like there's no tomorrow. I enjoy other peoples' personal experience stories. Afterall, this is a discussion group, not some prudish moderated peer-reviewed==peer-controlled journals that nobody reads but where all the physics professionals beg to be published in. In sum, Editors be Censors. Was I born yesterday?! > > > "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>wrote: > > > > > Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > > > >Odd, who is the observer, in this case? > > > >Are you saying that The Milky Way is > > > >the Center of a fantastic expansion? > > > >Yes, you are saying that. > > > > > Michael wrote: > > > Where is Sam Wormley and his "No Center" post when you need it? > > > > > Virdy wrote: > > A) Are you Michael Moroney incapable of searching for it yourself? > > B) The count of Sam Worm Liars posts overwhelms your search engines? > > C) Shouldn't you just be able to paraphrase all Sam's cut and pastes? > > > > > Michael wrote: > > > On second thought, don't bother, Sam. John is too thick to understand > > > it, > > > he'll ignore it and then post some more "We must be the center!" crap, > > > or whine how something on the diagonal of a grid recedes faster (just as > > > expected) or something, > > Virdy wrote: > Btw MM, Moron Smart or otherwise, we not only must be the center of > The Universe, we actually are per the kooky we all live on a Yellow > Submarine on the surface of fish(y) Cow, spherical by all diametrical > measures. Schools can never make fools of all of us Us US. Axiomatically. > > What do I mean Moroney? If you had any actual real education at all, > firstly your writing would reflect it, and you wouldn't hide it like > do your cohorts HVAC, Odd Bodkin, ..., Sam Worm Liar. It's just too bad > you all are well funded enough to use different distinct addressed IP > servers. Your ignorable message remains the same. Now you know we know. > > We all can do the math to see with whom you agree or not. It's called > reading. > > > Virdy wrote: > > D) It's always just an either or for you Moroney? People can't simply > > explore ideas that go against the grains of some mythical Status Quo > > Scientists? Everyday, same scientists are shouting at the top of their > > lungs how little they actually know about the Universe. Why is that? > > E) Calling everyone else kooks or crazy or uneducated really merely > > makes you Moron Smart. Keep up the facade around your house of cards. > > > > -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: MM's posts' content is so predictable.” > > -- Mahipal “IPMM... Take care Sir hanson. Do cut down on them visuals.” > > > hanson wrote: > Why?.. It's NOT me that is the Pervert. I merely report > what they brag/ged about and have put on the web.... I get/understand that Sir hanson. BuTT Still?! Did I just paint something? Me2Me As OneHan(d)Solo: Do I Look Like A Usenet Rookie, FuzzBallWookie@#?! > That not only applies Full-Swine Glazier and his > "under"study "Double Anon E. Mouse" but also > to Sam Wormley whose visuals you did not object > to even though Sam has not yet gotten off the fat one > there in row 2: > <http://tinyurl.com/CC-AG-warmed-Wormley> I do have my limits?! That seventh heaven row of girls image I like. ObviousismIshQ: The farther She is, the more beautiful She is! Not to mention, the farther She is, the safer you and I are. 911. Thank god God G-D, no women read sci dot physics! What a relief. > Different stroke for & from different folks, eh... LOL Very wise words indeed Sir hanson. Thanks for them. > . Period! All the best Sir hanson, and let's shy away from one another before the Usenet Hyenas come after our tails. Shhh... be very Very VERY quiet... We're hunting rabbits... Shhh... -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: I always read your posts, hanson and Mark.”
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-14 12:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <VmPPy.6287$I26.2364@fx44.iad> |
| In reply to | #570390 |
On 04/14/2016 07:59 AM, Mahipal wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 7:46:04 PM UTC-4, hanson wrote:
>>> Virdy "Mahipal" <mahipal7638@gmail.com> wrote
>>> an EXCELLENT post. It has wider applications.
>>> It applies to every poster who is not a physicist
>>> but especially to the loud mouths who brag to be
>>> "autodidacts". It means that they have read some
>>> articles, which gave them a fixed idea that fits
>>> their emotional Weltbild, which they then attempt
>>> to stuff down other folks throat... Jeff Relf, Porat,
>>> Full Swine Glazier, rect-Al Schwartz, Ferkelson
>>> Odd Boinker & Hellmutt Wabnigger practice that.
>>> But they are always good for a laugh, n'est pas.
>>> Take care Virdy -- -- hanson
>>
>> Virdy wrote:
>> I hope, me m(y) fingers crossed, you Sir hanson, don't mean EXCELLENT
>> for a change?! He he... Ha ha...
>> Ferkelson does not belong on that list. Unless you mean someone other
>> than Mark L. Fergerson. I realize you hanson and I don't always share the
>> same friends, but for the most part, we somehow do. Do The Physics.
>> I also like Yehiel Porat, Circulon Engineer for some circular reason. I can'
>> explain it.
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> Porat is not as bad as is the Ferkel. Porat at least stays in his
>> "Abstract"... But the Ferkel insisted with parroting and echoing
>> John Baez's assertion that Gold is yellow because of its
>> relativistic electrons... despite the fact that one can buy,
>> commercially, pure gold of any color that the rainbow has.
>> When that was pointed out, Ferkel got nasty, like those
>> autodidacts usually do.
>
> Don't get me started on John "Factor 2" Baez, who reads Usenet but his
> employment contract forbids him from interacting here anymore. Squared!
> Baez's imminent forced retirement can't be all that far away. Hi John!
>
> Btw, the only thing I know about gold Gold is that the(y)TheThem refuse to
> let me buy any based upon my CreditKarmaHistoryReports. No joke, BiggestData@#.
>
> We all have feelings and sensitivities, as you Sir hanson well know.
> Like autodidact wise genius Sir John Lennon sings: Give Mark A Chance...
> I sure hope Sir Mark does not have me in his killfiles lists! He he...
>
> I get it, Sir is one I minus the iApple SirI. Was I born yesterday?!
>
> Autodidactic I, also accept that Mark is not much into small talk.
> Me, I blah Blah BLAH like there's no tomorrow. I enjoy other peoples'
> personal experience stories. Afterall, this is a discussion group, not
> some prudish moderated peer-reviewed==peer-controlled journals that
> nobody reads but where all the physics professionals beg to be
> published in. In sum, Editors be Censors. Was I born yesterday?!
>
>>>> "Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>> Sefton john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> Odd, who is the observer, in this case?
>>>>> Are you saying that The Milky Way is
>>>>> the Center of a fantastic expansion?
>>>>> Yes, you are saying that.
>>>>
>>> Michael wrote:
>>>> Where is Sam Wormley and his "No Center" post when you need it?
>>>>
>>> Virdy wrote:
>>> A) Are you Michael Moroney incapable of searching for it yourself?
>>> B) The count of Sam Worm Liars posts overwhelms your search engines?
>>> C) Shouldn't you just be able to paraphrase all Sam's cut and pastes?
>>>>
>>> Michael wrote:
>>>> On second thought, don't bother, Sam. John is too thick to understand
>>>> it,
>>>> he'll ignore it and then post some more "We must be the center!" crap,
>>>> or whine how something on the diagonal of a grid recedes faster (just as
>>>> expected) or something,
>>
>> Virdy wrote:
>> Btw MM, Moron Smart or otherwise, we not only must be the center of
>> The Universe, we actually are per the kooky we all live on a Yellow
>> Submarine on the surface of fish(y) Cow, spherical by all diametrical
>> measures. Schools can never make fools of all of us Us US. Axiomatically.
>>
>> What do I mean Moroney? If you had any actual real education at all,
>> firstly your writing would reflect it, and you wouldn't hide it like
>> do your cohorts HVAC, Odd Bodkin, ..., Sam Worm Liar. It's just too bad
>> you all are well funded enough to use different distinct addressed IP
>> servers. Your ignorable message remains the same. Now you know we know.
>>
>> We all can do the math to see with whom you agree or not. It's called
>> reading.
>>
>>> Virdy wrote:
>>> D) It's always just an either or for you Moroney? People can't simply
>>> explore ideas that go against the grains of some mythical Status Quo
>>> Scientists? Everyday, same scientists are shouting at the top of their
>>> lungs how little they actually know about the Universe. Why is that?
>>> E) Calling everyone else kooks or crazy or uneducated really merely
>>> makes you Moron Smart. Keep up the facade around your house of cards.
>>>
>>> -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: MM's posts' content is so predictable.”
>>
>> -- Mahipal “IPMM... Take care Sir hanson. Do cut down on them visuals.”
>>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> Why?.. It's NOT me that is the Pervert. I merely report
>> what they brag/ged about and have put on the web....
>
> I get/understand that Sir hanson. BuTT Still?! Did I just paint something?
>
> Me2Me As OneHan(d)Solo: Do I Look Like A Usenet Rookie, FuzzBallWookie@#?!
>
>> That not only applies Full-Swine Glazier and his
>> "under"study "Double Anon E. Mouse" but also
>> to Sam Wormley whose visuals you did not object
>> to even though Sam has not yet gotten off the fat one
>> there in row 2:
>> <http://tinyurl.com/CC-AG-warmed-Wormley>
>
> I do have my limits?! That seventh heaven row of girls image I like.
> ObviousismIshQ: The farther She is, the more beautiful She is!
> Not to mention, the farther She is, the safer you and I are. 911.
> Thank god God G-D, no women read sci dot physics! What a relief.
>
>> Different stroke for & from different folks, eh... LOL
>
> Very wise words indeed Sir hanson. Thanks for them.
>
>> .
>
> Period! All the best Sir hanson, and let's shy away from one another
> before the Usenet Hyenas come after our tails.
>
> Shhh... be very Very VERY quiet... We're hunting rabbits... Shhh...
Um, that would be hunting wabbits, Maple, but I'm sure you knew that.
Libs care about all freaks unless they don't like them (hunting or
conservatives) then suddenly they become the biggest bigots and sexists
on the planet (Speech impediment or Palin) And they have access to the
major media to make it really stick. How about that magazine cover with
27 Cosby accusers? Libs not amused when blacks don't think single
"motherhood" is wonderful and the decide the black family has value.
> -- Mahipal “IPMM... माहिपाल ७६३८: I always read your posts, hanson and Mark.”
>
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 09:16 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <52c4a19f-8107-4128-a334-a13edeafbccb@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #569900 |
Michael Moroney john <johnse...@gmail.com> writes: >Odd, who is the observer, in this case? >Are you saying that The Milky Way is >the Center of a fantastic expansion? >Yes, you are saying that. Where is Sam Wormley and his "No Center" post when you need it? ---------------- I'll say it. Where I am sitting right now is unequivocally and undeniably the precise, exact center of not only our galaxy, but the entire universe. Yep, I am that conceited. And I'm right
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 12:56 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <EM9Py.2224$Dn6.685@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #569917 |
On 04/12/2016 12:16 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Michael Moroney
> john <johnse...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Odd, who is the observer, in this case?
>> Are you saying that The Milky Way is
>> the Center of a fantastic expansion?
>> Yes, you are saying that.
>
> Where is Sam Wormley and his "No Center" post when you need it?
> ----------------
>
> I'll say it.
>
> Where I am sitting right now is unequivocally and undeniably the precise, exact center of not only our galaxy, but the entire universe.
>
> Yep, I am that conceited.
>
> And I'm right
>
No.
Lies as usual.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 15:34 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <maqdnYexVbJuxpDKnZ2dnUU7-WEAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569900 |
On 4/12/16 8:39 AM, Michael Moroney wrote: > john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> writes: > >> Odd, who is the observer, in this case? >> Are you saying that The Milky Way is >> the Center of a fantastic expansion? >> Yes, you are saying that. > > Where is Sam Wormley and his "No Center" post when you need it? > > On second thought, don't bother, Sam. John is too thick to understand it, > he'll ignore it and then post some more "We must be the center!" crap, > or whine how something on the diagonal of a grid recedes faster (just as > expected) or something, > We (humans) have wanting to be at the center for millennia. It was only during the 20th century that we are relegated to being insignificant and that nobody is any more the center than anybody else in the cosmos. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 13:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <979ff42a-7360-4523-ada4-b741c7512ca3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #569972 |
Sam Wormley - show quoted text - We (humans) have wanting to be at the center for millennia. It was only during the 20th century that we are relegated to being insignificant and that nobody is any more the center than anybody else in the cosmos. -------------- Nor less
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 23:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ZCiPy.2273$KD1.719@fx21.iad> |
| In reply to | #569981 |
On 04/12/2016 04:49 PM, HVAC wrote:
> Sam Wormley
> - show quoted text -
> We (humans) have wanting to be at the center for millennia. It
> was only during the 20th century that we are relegated to being
> insignificant and that nobody is any more the center than anybody
> else in the cosmos.
> --------------
>
> Nor less
>
Wormley is into Lib dogma like global warming and giving everyone in a
race a "first place" trophy so that nobody is better than anybody else.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 08:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <neiuh7$1k19$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569890 |
On 4/12/2016 7:34 AM, john wrote: > Odd, who is the observer, in this case? > Are you saying that The Milky Way is > the Center of a fantastic expansion? > Yes, you are saying that. John, observers are not presumed to be the physical center of anything. Let's say you have an observer in NY and an observer in Paris and an observer in Beijing. Are any of these observers presumed to be the physical center of anything? -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 13:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <oS9Py.2225$Dn6.314@fx28.iad> |
| In reply to | #569901 |
On 04/12/2016 09:51 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 4/12/2016 7:34 AM, john wrote:
>> Odd, who is the observer, in this case?
>> Are you saying that The Milky Way is
>> the Center of a fantastic expansion?
>> Yes, you are saying that.
>
> John, observers are not presumed to be the physical center of anything.
>
> Let's say you have an observer in NY and an observer in Paris and an
> observer in Beijing. Are any of these observers presumed to be the
> physical center of anything?
Physics says (as you well know) that EACH of them is at the center of
the universe. It's religious dogma, Odd, so you just have to believe.
Don't question it.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 12:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <neluf7$bba$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #569927 |
On 4/12/2016 12:02 PM, benj wrote: > On 04/12/2016 09:51 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >> On 4/12/2016 7:34 AM, john wrote: >>> Odd, who is the observer, in this case? >>> Are you saying that The Milky Way is >>> the Center of a fantastic expansion? >>> Yes, you are saying that. >> >> John, observers are not presumed to be the physical center of anything. >> >> Let's say you have an observer in NY and an observer in Paris and an >> observer in Beijing. Are any of these observers presumed to be the >> physical center of anything? > > Physics says (as you well know) that EACH of them is at the center of > the universe. You say observers should be taken as the center. So which of these three observers is at the center? If you can't explain why you believe the observer is at the center, then why did you mention it? > It's religious dogma, Odd, so you just have to believe. > Don't question it. You can question it all you want. I gave you THREE EXAMPLES, one a rod, one a plate, one a grid -- where there is no way to determine a center and the expansion looks the same from anywhere you are on any of them. But you still say there HAS TO BE a center (for some reason), even though you can't point to any of the three examples I gave and show how you would go about finding that. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 14:54 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <7CwPy.3254$k%1.1873@fx34.iad> |
| In reply to | #570175 |
On 04/13/2016 01:09 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
> On 4/12/2016 12:02 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 04/12/2016 09:51 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>> On 4/12/2016 7:34 AM, john wrote:
>>>> Odd, who is the observer, in this case?
>>>> Are you saying that The Milky Way is
>>>> the Center of a fantastic expansion?
>>>> Yes, you are saying that.
>>>
>>> John, observers are not presumed to be the physical center of anything.
>>>
>>> Let's say you have an observer in NY and an observer in Paris and an
>>> observer in Beijing. Are any of these observers presumed to be the
>>> physical center of anything?
>>
>> Physics says (as you well know) that EACH of them is at the center of
>> the universe.
>
> You say observers should be taken as the center. So which of these three
> observers is at the center? If you can't explain why you believe the
> observer is at the center, then why did you mention it?
Because it's what they OBSERVE dummy. Science is about observations and
measurements not fantasy and dogma.
>> It's religious dogma, Odd, so you just have to believe.
>> Don't question it.
>
> You can question it all you want. I gave you THREE EXAMPLES, one a rod,
> one a plate, one a grid -- where there is no way to determine a center
> and the expansion looks the same from anywhere you are on any of them.
All are the same idea and all of them wrong. Nothing is "infinite".
(Well nothing but human stupidity and the love of God, right HVAC?) That
is a mathematical fantasy. Science is not based upon fantasy
mathematical or otherwise. HVAC says the universe is finite but
"unbounded". And that means it has a center someplace. That is math,
Boinker.
> But you still say there HAS TO BE a center (for some reason), even
> though you can't point to any of the three examples I gave and show how
> you would go about finding that.
Thats because none of your three examples are even slightly correct.
Where is the center of the earth? If I give examples of three places to
stand in various countries then why can't you tell me which one of those
places is the "center" of the planet? Clearly the planet HAS a center,
no? Then why can't you buy me an airline ticket to the place where I can
stand on the center of the earth?
You really don't get it, do you?
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-12 15:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <maqdnYaxVbKzwZDKnZ2dnUU7-WGdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #569901 |
On 4/12/16 8:51 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: > On 4/12/2016 7:34 AM, john wrote: >> Odd, who is the observer, in this case? >> Are you saying that The Milky Way is >> the Center of a fantastic expansion? >> Yes, you are saying that. > > John, observers are not presumed to be the physical center of anything. > > Let's say you have an observer in NY and an observer in Paris and an > observer in Beijing. Are any of these observers presumed to be the > physical center of anything? > Including the French was not a good idea. -- sci.physics is an unmoderated newsgroup dedicated to the discussion of physics, news from the physics community, and physics-related social issues.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 09:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <1d5b4d20-27ea-4b4a-9393-383ac67da0f8@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #569717 |
Hanson hanson wrote: Excellent!. Now Harlow, explain to john what your 'space itself is expanding' INTO. -------------- Space itself is expanding. Period. Why is that difficult to understand? Please tell me. And please... Any answer that involves ether. I don't want to hear it
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 09:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <negjfn$mgg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #569722 |
"HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: > > hanson wrote: > Excellent!. Now Harlow, explain to john > what your 'space itself is expanding' INTO. > Harlo wrote: > Space itself is expanding. Period. > Why is that difficult to understand? Please tell me. > And please... Any answer that involves ether. > I don't want to hear it > hanson wrote: .... ahahahahaha.. forget the "ether". I asked you what your space is expanding into?... a Period?... Are you menstruating? > Is your space expanding into nothing? If so, then that nothing must be something because it contains your expanding space. >. What do you call that nothing/something if it is 'Not that difficult to understand" Please explain after you are off the rag. > PS: Harlow, your "Period" gig, reminds me of Sunday school, long ago, where I was told: "Believe & have Faith. Period" ..."The Load moves in mysterious ways. Period". LOL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 09:52 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a0b3453b-cb51-464d-8285-3a39a83bbcab@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #569735 |
hanson "HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote: > > hanson wrote: > Excellent!. Now Harlow, explain to john > what your 'space itself is expanding' INTO. > Harlo wrote: > Space itself is expanding. Period. > Why is that difficult to understand? Please tell me. > And please... Any answer that involves ether. > I don't want to hear it > hanson wrote: .... ahahahahaha.. forget the "ether". I asked you what your space is expanding into?... a Period?... Are you menstruating? > Is your space expanding into nothing? If so, then that nothing must be something because it contains your expanding space. >. What do you call that nothing/something if it is 'Not that difficult to understand" Please explain after you are off the rag. > PS: Harlow, your "Period" gig, reminds me of Sunday school, long ago, where I was told: "Believe & have Faith. Period" ..."The Load moves in mysterious ways. Period". LOL ----------- Apparently you are under the delusion that the universe is bounded. It's not. Our universe (which means all that is) is getting larger. Your attempt to play word games will never fly with me... I cut my teeth on word games. Stop acting like a jew
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 10:33 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <negn03$4vo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #569743 |
"HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote: > hanson > > "HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> hanson wrote: >> Excellent!. Now Harlow, explain to john >> what your 'space itself is expanding' INTO. >> > Harlo wrote: >> Space itself is expanding. Period. >> Why is that difficult to understand? Please tell me. >> And please... Any answer that involves ether. >> I don't want to hear it >> > hanson wrote: > .... ahahahahaha.. forget the "ether". > I asked you what your space is expanding > into?... a Period?... Are you menstruating? >> > Is your space expanding into nothing? > If so, then that nothing must be something > because it contains your expanding space. >>. > What do you call that nothing/something > if it is 'Not that difficult to understand" > Please explain after you are off the rag. >> > PS: > Harlow, your "Period" gig, reminds me of > Sunday school, long ago, where I was told: > "Believe & have Faith. Period" ..."The Load > moves in mysterious ways. Period". LOL > ----------- Harlow wrote: > Apparently you are under the delusion that the universe is bounded. It's > not. > Our universe (which means all that is) is getting larger. > hanson wrote: Well if "Our universe is all that is... is getting larger". then it is NOT all there is. So, what is that larger thing? > Harlow the Jew hater wrote: > Your attempt to play word games will never fly with me... > I cut my teeth on word games. > Stop acting like a jew > hanson wrote: But Harlow that "expanding space" of yours is Judenphysik, the 1948 "ABC theory" from kikes Alpher, Bethe and Gamov. Thanks for the laughs... .... --- Cohanson ..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 13:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <KqROy.7$2s3.2@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #569743 |
On 04/11/2016 12:52 PM, HVAC wrote:
> hanson
>
> "HVAC" <mr....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> Excellent!. Now Harlow, explain to john
>> what your 'space itself is expanding' INTO.
>>
> Harlo wrote:
>> Space itself is expanding. Period.
>> Why is that difficult to understand? Please tell me.
>> And please... Any answer that involves ether.
>> I don't want to hear it
>>
> hanson wrote:
> .... ahahahahaha.. forget the "ether".
> I asked you what your space is expanding
> into?... a Period?... Are you menstruating?
>>
> Is your space expanding into nothing?
> If so, then that nothing must be something
> because it contains your expanding space.
>> .
> What do you call that nothing/something
> if it is 'Not that difficult to understand"
> Please explain after you are off the rag.
>>
> PS:
> Harlow, your "Period" gig, reminds me of
> Sunday school, long ago, where I was told:
> "Believe & have Faith. Period" ..."The Load
> moves in mysterious ways. Period". LOL
> -----------
>
> Apparently you are under the delusion that the universe is bounded. It's not.
>
> Our universe (which means all that is) is getting larger.
>
> Your attempt to play word games will never fly with me... I cut my teeth on word games.
>
> Stop acting like a jew
>
Oooooooo! "Acting like a Jew?"
Score:
HVAC = 1
Hanson = 0
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <none@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-11 13:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <uVQOy.5$2s3.2@fx04.iad> |
| In reply to | #569735 |
On 04/11/2016 12:33 PM, hanson wrote:
> "HVAC" <mr.hvac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> hanson wrote:
>> Excellent!. Now Harlow, explain to john
>> what your 'space itself is expanding' INTO.
>>
> Harlo wrote:
>> Space itself is expanding. Period.
>> Why is that difficult to understand? Please tell me.
>> And please... Any answer that involves ether.
>> I don't want to hear it
>>
> hanson wrote:
> .... ahahahahaha.. forget the "ether".
> I asked you what your space is expanding
> into?... a Period?... Are you menstruating?
>>
> Is your space expanding into nothing?
> If so, then that nothing must be something
> because it contains your expanding space.
>> .
> What do you call that nothing/something
> if it is 'Not that difficult to understand"
> Please explain after you are off the rag.
>>
> PS:
> Harlow, your "Period" gig, reminds me of
> Sunday school, long ago, where I was told:
> "Believe & have Faith. Period" ..."The Load
> moves in mysterious ways. Period". LOL
The HVAC also moves in mysterious ways, Hanson.
Just believe in your moderator and worship his every word an you'll be
just fine! Just consider yourself lucky he allows you to post here.
--
___ ___ ___ ___
/\ \ /\ \ /\__\ /\ \
/::\ \ /::\ \ /::| | \:\ \
/:/\:\ \ /:/\:\ \ /:|:| | ___ /::\__\
/::\~\:\__\ /::\~\:\ \ /:/|:| |__ /\ /:/\/__/
/:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/ /
\:\~\:\/:/ / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/ / \::/ /
\:\ \::/ / \:\ \:\__\ |:/:/ / \/__/
\:\/:/ / \:\ \/__/ |::/ /
\::/__/ \:\__\ /:/ /
~~ \/__/ \/__/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 8 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web