Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus ๐ถ็ฌ <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 6 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 21 Next page →
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys063p6js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629338 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:58:36 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 12:49 PM, in article op.yysz0khojs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 20:40:10 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >> >>> On 4/16/17, 12:28 PM, in article op.yysy1ye4js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>>> So to you a subset of humans do not look like humans. >>>>>> >>>>>> They aren't humans, they're just similar. About as similar as orangutans. >>>>>> >>>>>>> And this subset is not >>>>>>> even based on genetics or the look of the people but on their religion. >>>>>> >>>>>> And their looks. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Um. Wow. All you are saying is you cannot understand even basic logic. >>>>>>> Amazing. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's you that's screwed up your logic. If they don't look like you, they >>>>>> aren't the same species. >>>>> >>>>> You keep showing basic logic is beyond you. OK. >>>> >>>> Do you even know what species means? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>>> I suppose you think a robin and a >>>> blackbird are the same because they both have two wings? >>> >>> And once again you show your ignorance. In some ways I commend you for that: >>> many online try to pretend they know about stuff they do not. You simply are >>> out with it -- you are ignorant of many things and do not mind sharing with >>> all. >> >> Answer the question. > > > I did: your questions repeatedly show deep ignorance of what is being > discussed. The very fact you think someone would even consider the idea that > a blackbird and a robin are the same species because both have wings is > absurd. It is a clear and absolute demonstration of how lost you are. So why do you think Muslims and humans are the same? They have the same number of limbs but that's about it. -- Don't adopt a dwarf with learning difficulties. It's not big, and it's not clever.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5192775.9F557%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #629344 |
On 4/16/17, 1:14 PM, in article op.yys063p6js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> I suppose you think a robin and a >>>>> blackbird are the same because they both have two wings? >>>> >>>> And once again you show your ignorance. In some ways I commend you for >>>> that: >>>> many online try to pretend they know about stuff they do not. You simply >>>> are >>>> out with it -- you are ignorant of many things and do not mind sharing with >>>> all. >>> >>> Answer the question. >> >> >> I did: your questions repeatedly show deep ignorance of what is being >> discussed. The very fact you think someone would even consider the idea that >> a blackbird and a robin are the same species because both have wings is >> absurd. It is a clear and absolute demonstration of how lost you are. > > So why do you think Muslims and humans are the same? I no more think they are the same than I think squares and rectangles are the same. Again, this is very basic logic... and it goes over your head. Or you pretend it does with your trolling. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yys3wsr7js98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #629364 |
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 21:51:49 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/16/17, 1:14 PM, in article op.yys063p6js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson > Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: > >>>>>> I suppose you think a robin and a >>>>>> blackbird are the same because they both have two wings? >>>>> >>>>> And once again you show your ignorance. In some ways I commend you for >>>>> that: >>>>> many online try to pretend they know about stuff they do not. You simply >>>>> are >>>>> out with it -- you are ignorant of many things and do not mind sharing with >>>>> all. >>>> >>>> Answer the question. >>> >>> >>> I did: your questions repeatedly show deep ignorance of what is being >>> discussed. The very fact you think someone would even consider the idea that >>> a blackbird and a robin are the same species because both have wings is >>> absurd. It is a clear and absolute demonstration of how lost you are. >> >> So why do you think Muslims and humans are the same? > > I no more think they are the same than I think squares and rectangles are > the same. Again, this is very basic logic... and it goes over your head. Or > you pretend it does with your trolling. If they are not the same, why do you treat them as such? -- A recent study found that the average Aussie walks about 900 miles a year. Another study found that Aussies drink, on average, 22 gallons of alcohol a year. That means that, on average, Aussies get about 41 miles to the gallon!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <q2svecldfmrede2cudi3uo3a1c0vvq26j1@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #628856 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:31:57 -0500, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote: >On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: > >> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >> Neanderthal. > >One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from >chimpanzee DNA. I'm not sure, but that might be an old statistic. These days, it's more like 0.4% for both chimpanzees and bonobos. See http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives and note the last paragraph which says "This item has been updated to reflect that chimps and bonobos are two species of chimpanzees that are close enough to humans to share 99.6% of their DNA. The international sequencing effort was led by Max Planck composed of multiple teams including 454 Life Sciences in Branford, Connecticut. The researchers also found that the ancestors of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 million years ago, not more than 5 million years ago as originally reported."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yynnjompjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628869 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:44:16 +0100, Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:31:57 -0500, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> > wrote: > >> On 04/13/2017 01:20 PM, Snit wrote: >> >>> Still have something like 1-4% Neanderthal DNA. You, likely, are part >>> Neanderthal. >> >> One thing I remember is that 1.4% of human DNA is different from >> chimpanzee DNA. > > > I'm not sure, but that might be an old statistic. These days, it's > more like 0.4% for both chimpanzees and bonobos. > > See > http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives > and note the last paragraph which says > > "This item has been updated to reflect that chimps and bonobos are two > species of chimpanzees that are close enough to humans to share 99.6% > of their DNA. The international sequencing effort was led by Max > Planck composed of multiple teams including 454 Life Sciences in > Branford, Connecticut. The researchers also found that the ancestors > of humans split from the ancestor of bonobos and chimps more than 4 > million years ago, not more than 5 million years ago as originally > reported." Irrelevant statistic. You might share lots of DNA with anything that has a heart and liver. Doesn't mean you're anything like the other creature. -- A man is a person who will pay two dollars for a one-dollar item he wants. A woman will pay one dollar for a two-dollar item that she doesn't want.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <bKPHA.18801$PI.12242@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #628840 |
On 2017-04-13 14:11, Snit wrote: [...] > Unless you are of Neanderthal dissent (black) you almost surely have > Neanderthal heritage. Africans have no Neanderthal DNA. There is some evidence (AFAIK not fully confirmed) that some Asian populations have Denisovian DNA as well. -- Best, Wolf K https://kirkwood40.blogspot.com "What good is it having lower taxes when you canโt drink the water?โ
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FCE29.9DF6F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628016 |
On 4/9/17, 11:30 AM, in article ocduks$joa$4@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:30:29 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, >>> wrote this: >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>> Wilkinson >>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>>> >>>>>> The US never had one. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>> >>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>> their lives. >>>>>> >>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>>> >>>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your >>>> expense. >>>> >>> >>> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. >>> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. >> >> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from >> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking >> for equality. > > What family history? Exactly. Many do not even know what part of Africa they came from, no less who their grand parents / great grandparents... or what their ancestral language was. Anything. > They were sold/traded by their own kind. By humans. Correct. > The people they are angry with are in the ground. What people? I am speaking on societal terms. And there are still MANY bigots around today. > I didn't ask them to be here. > They can go back. See: such as you... you are a great example of someone, TODAY, engaging in bigoted behavior. > There are boats, and even airplanes. > Bye. Funny I find no examples of you saying this about Europeans... who did FAR more harm. But, of course, you are sharing yoru bigoted world view and not reason. >>> I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdvf8$joa$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628024 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:40:25 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:30 AM, in article ocduks$joa$4@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:30:29 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, >>>> wrote this: >>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>> Wilkinson >>>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The US never had one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>>> their lives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>>>> >>>>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your >>>>> expense. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. >>>> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. >>> >>> Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from >>> them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking >>> for equality. >> >> What family history? > > Exactly. Many do not even know what part of Africa they came from, no less > who their grand parents / great grandparents... or what their ancestral > language was. Anything. > >> They were sold/traded by their own kind. > > By humans. Correct. By negroes. Negroes sold their own kind. They were sold intentionally by black people to white people. Or traded, for salt, pepper, guns, gunpowder, pron. > >> The people they are angry with are in the ground. > > What people? I am speaking on societal terms. And there are still MANY > bigots around today. > Are bigots people that don't know history? >> I didn't ask them to be here. >> They can go back. > > See: such as you... you are a great example of someone, TODAY, engaging in > bigoted behavior. > If I was a bigot, I would want them to stay. I don't care. "I" didn't bring them here. >> There are boats, and even airplanes. >> Bye. > > Funny I find no examples of you saying this about Europeans... who did FAR > more harm. But, of course, you are sharing yoru bigoted world view and not > reason. Italians make good food. Germans make good tools. English make good drama. Negroes make trouble. > >>>> I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :) -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD22A.9DFA2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628029 |
On 4/9/17, 11:44 AM, in article ocdvf8$joa$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: ... >>> What family history? >> >> Exactly. Many do not even know what part of Africa they came from, no less >> who their grand parents / great grandparents... or what their ancestral >> language was. Anything. >> >>> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >> >> By humans. Correct. > > By negroes. > Negroes sold their own kind. > They were sold intentionally by black people to white people. > Or traded, for salt, pepper, guns, gunpowder, pron. I am sure somewhere you will note how you think this ties into many blacks not having a history which leads to challenges you and I do not have. Right? >>> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >> >> What people? I am speaking on societal terms. And there are still MANY >> bigots around today. > > Are bigots people that don't know history? Your knowledge of history or lack of it is not really relevant. >>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>> They can go back. >> >> See: such as you... you are a great example of someone, TODAY, engaging in >> bigoted behavior. > > If I was a bigot, I would want them to stay. > I don't care. > "I" didn't bring them here. It is not about if you are or are not a bigot. You are clearly and unambiguously sharing bigoted idea. >>> There are boats, and even airplanes. >>> Bye. >> >> Funny I find no examples of you saying this about Europeans... who did FAR >> more harm. But, of course, you are sharing yoru bigoted world view and not >> reason. > > Italians make good food. > Germans make good tools. > English make good drama. > Negroes make trouble. Great example of what I noted. By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce079$joa$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628034 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:57:30 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:44 AM, in article ocdvf8$joa$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>> What family history? >>> >>> Exactly. Many do not even know what part of Africa they came from, no less >>> who their grand parents / great grandparents... or what their ancestral >>> language was. Anything. >>> >>>> They were sold/traded by their own kind. >>> >>> By humans. Correct. >> >> By negroes. >> Negroes sold their own kind. >> They were sold intentionally by black people to white people. >> Or traded, for salt, pepper, guns, gunpowder, pron. > > I am sure somewhere you will note how you think this ties into many blacks > not having a history which leads to challenges you and I do not have. Right? > >>>> The people they are angry with are in the ground. >>> >>> What people? I am speaking on societal terms. And there are still MANY >>> bigots around today. >> >> Are bigots people that don't know history? > > Your knowledge of history or lack of it is not really relevant. > >>>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>>> They can go back. >>> >>> See: such as you... you are a great example of someone, TODAY, engaging in >>> bigoted behavior. >> >> If I was a bigot, I would want them to stay. >> I don't care. >> "I" didn't bring them here. > > It is not about if you are or are not a bigot. You are clearly and > unambiguously sharing bigoted idea. > >>>> There are boats, and even airplanes. >>>> Bye. >>> >>> Funny I find no examples of you saying this about Europeans... who did FAR >>> more harm. But, of course, you are sharing yoru bigoted world view and not >>> reason. >> >> Italians make good food. >> Germans make good tools. >> English make good drama. >> Negroes make trouble. > > Great example of what I noted. > > By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. > Not to Ethiopians. The swelled belly, starving for the camera gives it away. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD39A.9DFB8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628037 |
On 4/9/17, 11:57 AM, in article oce079$joa$10@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> Italians make good food. >>> Germans make good tools. >>> English make good drama. >>> Negroes make trouble. >> >> Great example of what I noted. >> >> By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. > > Not to Ethiopians. The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run their business if they did not enjoy the food they made? Seems unlikely. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce0kv$joa$12@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628039 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:03:38 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:57 AM, in article oce079$joa$10@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>>> Italians make good food. >>>> Germans make good tools. >>>> English make good drama. >>>> Negroes make trouble. >>> >>> Great example of what I noted. >>> >>> By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. >> >> Not to Ethiopians. > > The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from > Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run their > business if they did not enjoy the food they made? I don't know? To make money. You should try it. You have to stand sometimes, but the money is worth it. > > Seems unlikely. Lies a little. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD560.9DFC7%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628043 |
On 4/9/17, 12:05 PM, in article oce0kv$joa$12@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:03:38 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 11:57 AM, in article oce079$joa$10@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>> Italians make good food. >>>>> Germans make good tools. >>>>> English make good drama. >>>>> Negroes make trouble. >>>> >>>> Great example of what I noted. >>>> >>>> By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. >>> >>> Not to Ethiopians. >> >> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run their >> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? > > I don't know? So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia and other nearby countries come there? > To make money. I am sure that is a goal, too. > You should try it. I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if you had tried it. You did not answer. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628045 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:11:12 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 12:05 PM, in article oce0kv$joa$12@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:03:38 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 11:57 AM, in article oce079$joa$10@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>>> Italians make good food. >>>>>> Germans make good tools. >>>>>> English make good drama. >>>>>> Negroes make trouble. >>>>> >>>>> Great example of what I noted. >>>>> >>>>> By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. >>>> >>>> Not to Ethiopians. >>> >>> The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from >>> Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run their >>> business if they did not enjoy the food they made? >> >> I don't know? > > So you made up your claim. OK. Also why would other people from Ethepia and > other nearby countries come there? Similar language? The stench? > >> To make money. > > I am sure that is a goal, too. > It *is* the goal. >> You should try it. > > I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if > you had tried it. You did not answer. > Fuck no. I eat food that taste good. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD63D.9DFD0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628046 |
On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >> you had tried it. You did not answer. >> > > Fuck no. > I eat food that taste good. So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce1cr$joa$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628047 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>> >> >> Fuck no. >> I eat food that taste good. > > So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your > ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. Doesn't make me a bigot. Means I eats what I likes. :) What the hell is Ethiopian food? Flies? -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oce1s0$sdo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628052 |
On 4/9/2017 2:17 PM, Sprang wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>> >>> >>> Fuck no. >>> I eat food that taste good. >> >> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. > > If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. > Doesn't make me a bigot. > Means I eats what I likes. :) > > What the hell is Ethiopian food? > Flies? > Hello! Is this the Windows 10 newsgroup? L could have sworn it was, But now I'M not sure... Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce2fb$joa$15@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628055 |
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 14:28:54 -0500, Rene Lamontagne, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/2017 2:17 PM, Sprang wrote: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Fuck no. >>>> I eat food that taste good. >>> >>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >> >> If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. >> Doesn't make me a bigot. >> Means I eats what I likes. :) >> >> What the hell is Ethiopian food? >> Flies? >> > > Hello! Is this the Windows 10 newsgroup? > L could have sworn it was, But now I'M not sure... > > Rene Yes, it is. Windows 10 really sucks, spies on you, makes you a dumbshit to use it. So other topics are far more interesting. What Linux distro are you using? What distro will you soon be using? I like SUSE. Or, will you be sucking it with Microsoft? I do have Windows 10, but I use it less and lesser. I decide who has access to my computer. It ain't strangers from Microsoft. Maybe you know them, and like them watching you. That's awesome.... but weird. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <oce2ns$5hd$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628058 |
On 4/9/2017 2:36 PM, Sprang wrote: > On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 14:28:54 -0500, Rene Lamontagne, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/2017 2:17 PM, Sprang wrote: >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fuck no. >>>>> I eat food that taste good. >>>> >>>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >>> >>> If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. >>> Doesn't make me a bigot. >>> Means I eats what I likes. :) >>> >>> What the hell is Ethiopian food? >>> Flies? >>> >> >> Hello! Is this the Windows 10 newsgroup? >> L could have sworn it was, But now I'M not sure... >> >> Rene > > Yes, it is. > Windows 10 really sucks, spies on you, makes you a dumbshit to use it. > So other topics are far more interesting. > What Linux distro are you using? > What distro will you soon be using? > I like SUSE. > > Or, will you be sucking it with Microsoft? > I do have Windows 10, but I use it less and lesser. > I decide who has access to my computer. > It ain't strangers from Microsoft. > Maybe you know them, and like them watching you. > That's awesome.... but weird. > See my earlier post on that subject. Mint 18.x is my latest copy pf Linux. Rene
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce33r$joa$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628061 |
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 14:43:46 -0500, Rene Lamontagne, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/2017 2:36 PM, Sprang wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 14:28:54 -0500, Rene Lamontagne, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/2017 2:17 PM, Sprang wrote: >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 12:14:53 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/9/17, 12:10 PM, in article oce0va$joa$13@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I have tried Ethiopian food... which I already noted. The question was if >>>>>>> you had tried it. You did not answer. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Fuck no. >>>>>> I eat food that taste good. >>>>> >>>>> So you have never tried it but decided it is not good. Ties into your >>>>> ignorance leading toward disliking thing we see with your bigoted views. >>>> >>>> If you dropped dead in front of me, I would not chew on your leg. >>>> Doesn't make me a bigot. >>>> Means I eats what I likes. :) >>>> >>>> What the hell is Ethiopian food? >>>> Flies? >>>> >>> >>> Hello! Is this the Windows 10 newsgroup? >>> L could have sworn it was, But now I'M not sure... >>> >>> Rene >> >> Yes, it is. >> Windows 10 really sucks, spies on you, makes you a dumbshit to use it. >> So other topics are far more interesting. >> What Linux distro are you using? >> What distro will you soon be using? >> I like SUSE. >> >> Or, will you be sucking it with Microsoft? >> I do have Windows 10, but I use it less and lesser. >> I decide who has access to my computer. >> It ain't strangers from Microsoft. >> Maybe you know them, and like them watching you. >> That's awesome.... but weird. >> > > > See my earlier post on that subject. > Mint 18.x is my latest copy pf Linux. > > Rene I like you even morer. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web