Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #626302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff-Relf.Me @. |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 404 — 30 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Smokers are smarter, I say. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-01 16:07 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 00:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-01 20:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 20:09 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-01 17:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 14:02 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:53 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 10:14 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 09:36 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. PAS <abc@doremi.net> - 2017-04-03 11:11 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:32 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-03 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-07 19:18 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-03 13:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 14:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 10:38 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-03 11:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:38 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-04-03 14:40 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-03 11:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 09:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 09:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-04 10:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 10:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 00:09 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-03 18:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-04 01:55 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-08 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 20:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 16:44 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 15:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 10:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:30 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:30 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:59 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-13 14:31 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 12:49 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 20:56 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 13:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-13 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 10:32 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 18:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 12:51 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 19:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-16 15:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:22 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-16 16:54 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:02 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:10 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:23 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-16 19:29 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:40 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 11:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:14 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-13 14:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-13 14:48 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:57 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:05 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:10 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:17 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-09 14:43 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:47 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 11:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 19:46 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 12:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-19 17:06 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-19 16:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:40 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 16:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 23:59 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 17:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 15:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 16:27 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:00 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:11 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:22 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 -0400
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 08:21 -0700
Re: OneDollar == OneVote. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 22:23 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:28 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 13:42 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-04-15 14:17 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:10 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:40 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:11 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:32 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 16:41 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 17:53 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:04 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:18 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 18:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 01:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:09 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 02:37 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 19:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 03:50 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 21:06 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 04:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 22:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 10:00 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 11:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 11:15 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 19:19 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 19:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 09:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 10:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 10:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 11:14 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 11:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2017-04-11 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-11 13:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-11 13:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 17:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 09:36 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:47 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:37 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 06:59 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-10 13:08 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2017-04-10 12:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-10 08:13 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 18:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:44 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 00:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pnalsing@gmail.com - 2017-04-15 16:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:07 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:49 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 18:41 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 19:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:39 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 20:31 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 12:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:13 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:13 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:50 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:54 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 15:58 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:38 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 19:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:15 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:27 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:31 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:43 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:48 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:15 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:26 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 21:24 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:17 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:29 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 13:52 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 20:53 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:12 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:26 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 14:34 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:34 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-16 16:03 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:10 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 22:16 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 01:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 22:12 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 21:29 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 23:11 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 09:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-13 23:42 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 10:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:03 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 11:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:43 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 20:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:50 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:44 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:28 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 15:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 00:58 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:17 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 10:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:50 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 11:08 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 14:45 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 14:13 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-18 21:52 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-18 13:59 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-18 17:09 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:30 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 16:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 22:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-14 21:21 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 23:48 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:25 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:37 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 02:20 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 09:03 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 13:51 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:06 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:11 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 23:05 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-17 22:12 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 01:33 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 12:10 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-19 18:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:20 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:46 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:19 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-09 18:23 +0000
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:32 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-11 01:35 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-10 17:48 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-13 23:39 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-13 16:28 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 19:55 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-14 15:35 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:29 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 17:21 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-17 20:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-17 12:45 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-14 12:51 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-14 21:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 16:04 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 11:52 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-08 16:15 -0400
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 21:36 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. notX <no.email@dummy.invalid> - 2017-04-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-08 17:51 +0100
Smoker Willie Nelson turns 84 this month. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-03 12:38 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-04-17 17:45 -0300
Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-04-02 12:13 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 20:18 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-02 16:36 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 18:19 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-02 23:32 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-02 19:09 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:27 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 16:35 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:02 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 01:19 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-02 17:34 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 22:54 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 15:17 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-05 00:08 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-04 19:05 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-05 09:49 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-05 08:39 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2017-04-05 23:33 -0500
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-09 19:23 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-02 23:08 -0500
Tardigrades (Was:Re: Old Age ...) Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-03 08:24 -0400
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-04 23:02 +0100
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-04 16:44 -0700
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-02 22:34 +0000
Re: Old Age is the leading cause of death everywhere, globally. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-03 00:25 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-04-16 23:51 +0800
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-16 16:53 +0100
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-02 14:55 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 07:56 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-04-03 12:57 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. erickawilliams.d@gmail.com - 2017-04-03 18:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. pcardinale@volcanomail.com - 2017-04-04 11:18 -0700
Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. numbernumber1964@gmail.com - 2017-04-13 11:45 -0700
Page 11 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 21 Next page →
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyqragbjjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628039 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 20:03:38 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 11:57 AM, in article oce079$joa$10@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>>> Italians make good food. >>>> Germans make good tools. >>>> English make good drama. >>>> Negroes make trouble. >>> >>> Great example of what I noted. >>> >>> By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. >> >> Not to Ethiopians. > > The three Ethiopian restaurants I have gone to were run by people from > Ethiopia... and they all seemed to like their food. Why would they run their > business if they did not enjoy the food they made? > > Seems unlikely. If you ate grass for 50 years, you'd like any food. -- I'd rather have a life than a living.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-10 09:56 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <v3enecl6jdokj3b7rh5qupp752v4ogt3up@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #628034 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:57:30 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. You weren't asking me, but I've had Ethiopian food three or four times, in a couple of restaurants in the US--never in Ethiopia. I generally liked it, but I wouldn't call it amazing. It's not on my list of top countries for food, When it comes to Africa, I like Moroccan food the best.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-10 10:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D5110C36.9E282%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628262 |
On 4/10/17, 9:56 AM, in article v3enecl6jdokj3b7rh5qupp752v4ogt3up@4ax.com, "Ken Blake" <Ken@invalid.news.com> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:57:30 -0700, Snit > <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > >> By the way, have you ever had Ethiopian food? It is AMAZING. > > You weren't asking me, but I've had Ethiopian food three or four > times, in a couple of restaurants in the US--never in Ethiopia. Same here... never been to Ethiopia (though my ex-sister-in-law was from there... he family was Indian but they lived there when she was born). > I generally liked it, but I wouldn't call it amazing. It's not on my > list of top countries for food, When it comes to Africa, I like > Moroccan food the best. I can certainly go for Moroccan as well, though I generally prefer Ethiopian. Still, I would not say no to either. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-15 15:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyqq9gxrjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628034 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:57:30 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 11:44 AM, in article ocdvf8$joa$6@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > > ... >>>> I didn't ask them to be here. >>>> They can go back. >>> >>> See: such as you... you are a great example of someone, TODAY, engaging in >>> bigoted behavior. >> >> If I was a bigot, I would want them to stay. >> I don't care. >> "I" didn't bring them here. > > It is not about if you are or are not a bigot. You are clearly and > unambiguously sharing bigoted idea. I find your unbigoted opinions disgusting. Stop it immediately. -- Times are tough. Just the other day, I saw a beggar who was so broke that he was standing on the corner shouting at the cars that went by. He was shouting, "WILL WORK FOR CARDBOARD AND A MAGIC MARKER!"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:36 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfxyzmxjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628012 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:30:29 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 4/9/17, 11:21 AM, in article ocdu3o$joa$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang" > <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, >> wrote this: >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>> >>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>> >>>>> The US never had one. >>>>> >>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>> >>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>> their lives. >>>>> >>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>> >>> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your >>> expense. >>> >> >> Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. >> They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. > > Yeah, how dare they be angry about their family history being stolen from > them... and still having direct impacts today. They should just stop asking > for equality. Imagine how much easier your life would be with a slave. Why did we listen to them? -- What's a diaphragm? A trampoline for dickheads.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfxqryzjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628008 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:21:45 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:19:53 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:00:58 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>> >>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>> >>>> The US never had one. >>>> >>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>> >>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>> their lives. >>>> >>>> Weird, eh? >>>> >>> >>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >> >> I bet you black folk use the hospitals more, after gang warfare, at your expense. >> > > Fuck me, we have all kinds of idiots. > They are still angry about slavery, for fucks sake. > I guess I'll pay for their hospital stay, so they can shoot me someday. :) Do you also have loads of Jews moaning about the war? I gather New York is full of them. -- What does Michael Jackson like about twenty-eight year olds? The fact that there are twenty of them.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FCB24.9DF45%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #627998 |
On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >> >> ... >>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>> >>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>> >>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >> >> The US never had one. >> >>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >> >> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >> their lives. >> >> Weird, eh? > > It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to pay for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. > It's the American dream... For Losers. Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will not get their way. I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdueq$joa$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628011 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:27:32 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>> ... >>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>> >>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>> >>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>> >>> The US never had one. >>> >>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>> >>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>> their lives. >>> >>> Weird, eh? >> >> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. > > I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to pay > for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. > >> It's the American dream... For Losers. > > Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will > not get their way. > > I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to > modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with > being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. > Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. Did you sell a laptop recently? It was freely given by a better person. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:35 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yyfxx5bdjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628013 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:38 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:27:32 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>> >>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>> >>>> The US never had one. >>>> >>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>> >>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>> their lives. >>>> >>>> Weird, eh? >>> >>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >> >> I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to pay >> for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. >> >>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >> >> Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will >> not get their way. >> >> I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to >> modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with >> being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. > > Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. > Did you sell a laptop recently? > It was freely given by a better person. ? -- All this "expressionism" in art, personally I think things ought to look like things. To me it's fairly easy to tell what the artists are trying to say with their smears and swirls -- they're trying to say they can't paint worth a damn.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocduud$joa$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628017 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:35:55 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:38 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:27:32 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>> On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ... >>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>> >>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>> >>>>> The US never had one. >>>>> >>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>> >>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>> their lives. >>>>> >>>>> Weird, eh? >>>> >>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>> >>> I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to pay >>> for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. >>> >>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>> >>> Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will >>> not get their way. >>> >>> I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to >>> modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with >>> being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. >> >> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >> Did you sell a laptop recently? >> It was freely given by a better person. > > ? > He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. He sold it immediately. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:42 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FCEBA.9DF88%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628022 |
On 4/9/17, 11:35 AM, in article ocduud$joa$5@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:35:55 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, > wrote this: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:38 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:27:32 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>> Wilkinson >>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>>> >>>>>> The US never had one. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>> >>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>> their lives. >>>>>> >>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>> >>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>> >>>> I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to >>>> pay >>>> for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. >>>> >>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>>> >>>> Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will >>>> not get their way. >>>> >>>> I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to >>>> modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with >>>> being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. >>> >>> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >>> Did you sell a laptop recently? >>> It was freely given by a better person. >> >> ? >> > > He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. > A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. > He sold it immediately. Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything about selling any computer any time in the last few years. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdvjn$joa$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628027 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:42:50 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:35 AM, in article ocduud$joa$5@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:35:55 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, >> wrote this: >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:38 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:27:32 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>> On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>> Wilkinson >>>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The US never had one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>>> their lives. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>>> >>>>> I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to >>>>> pay >>>>> for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. >>>>> >>>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>>>> >>>>> Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will >>>>> not get their way. >>>>> >>>>> I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to >>>>> modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with >>>>> being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. >>>> >>>> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >>>> Did you sell a laptop recently? >>>> It was freely given by a better person. >>> >>> ? >>> >> >> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. >> He sold it immediately. > > Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything > about selling any computer any time in the last few years. > That's why it was listed on ebay. You were just showing ot off. Right. Fuck off, jackass. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ocdvld$joa$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628031 |
On Sun, 9 Apr 2017 18:47:19 -0000 (UTC), Sprang, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:42:50 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 11:35 AM, in article ocduud$joa$5@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:35:55 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, >>> wrote this: >>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:38 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:27:32 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James >>>>>>>> Wilkinson >>>>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life >>>>>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will >>>>>>>>>>> be. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The US never had one. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>>>> their lives. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>>>> >>>>>> I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to >>>>>> pay >>>>>> for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. >>>>>> >>>>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will >>>>>> not get their way. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to >>>>>> modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with >>>>>> being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. >>>>> >>>>> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >>>>> Did you sell a laptop recently? >>>>> It was freely given by a better person. >>>> >>>> ? >>>> >>> >>> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >>> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. >>> He sold it immediately. >> >> Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything >> about selling any computer any time in the last few years. >> > > That's why it was listed on ebay. > You were just showing ot off. > Right. > Fuck off, jackass. > ebay=craigslist -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:58 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD25F.9DFA3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628032 |
On 4/9/17, 11:48 AM, in article ocdvld$joa$8@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >>>> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. >>>> He sold it immediately. >>> >>> Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything >>> about selling any computer any time in the last few years. >>> >> >> That's why it was listed on ebay. >> You were just showing ot off. >> Right. >> Fuck off, jackass. > > ebay=craigslist Nope. But I have not sold anything there, either. As I said, if you are not just trolling you have me confused with someone else. Again: what post of mine are you even talking about? I have no clue. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 19:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce0d5$joa$11@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628035 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:58:23 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:48 AM, in article ocdvld$joa$8@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>>>> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >>>>> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. >>>>> He sold it immediately. >>>> >>>> Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything >>>> about selling any computer any time in the last few years. >>>> >>> >>> That's why it was listed on ebay. >>> You were just showing ot off. >>> Right. >>> Fuck off, jackass. >> >> ebay=craigslist > > Nope. But I have not sold anything there, either. As I said, if you are not > just trolling you have me confused with someone else. Again: what post of > mine are you even talking about? I have no clue. You have plenty of clues. You not being able to solve them has nothing to do with me. Did you get $350 for it? It was worth less, a fucggen MacBook. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 12:05 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD411.9DFBF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628040 |
On 4/9/17, 12:00 PM, in article oce0d5$joa$11@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:58:23 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 11:48 AM, in article ocdvld$joa$8@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >>>>>> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his >>>>>> wofe. >>>>>> He sold it immediately. >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything >>>>> about selling any computer any time in the last few years. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That's why it was listed on ebay. >>>> You were just showing ot off. >>>> Right. >>>> Fuck off, jackass. >>> >>> ebay=craigslist >> >> Nope. But I have not sold anything there, either. As I said, if you are not >> just trolling you have me confused with someone else. Again: what post of >> mine are you even talking about? I have no clue. > > You have plenty of clues. All of which point to you just trolling me and not even talking about anything I have ever said, suggested, hinted at, or implied. > You not being able to solve them has nothing to do with me. > > Did you get $350 for it? For responding to your trolling and giving you attention? No, that is a free service. ... -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 11:54 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD16E.9DFA0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628031 |
On 4/9/17, 11:47 AM, in article ocdvjn$joa$7@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>>> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >>>>> Did you sell a laptop recently? >>>>> It was freely given by a better person. >>>> >>>> ? >>>> >>> >>> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >>> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. >>> He sold it immediately. >> >> Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything >> about selling any computer any time in the last few years. >> > > That's why it was listed on ebay. I have no listed anything on ebay in my life. Seriously, you either have me confused with someone else or are trolling. > You were just showing ot off. Again, I think you have me confused with someone else. What post are you even referencing? > Right. > Fuck off, jackass. And now you have me confused with you. :) -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 18:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <oce04j$joa$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #628033 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:54:22 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: > On 4/9/17, 11:47 AM, in article ocdvjn$joa$7@dont-email.me, "Sprang" ><spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > >>>>>> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >>>>>> Did you sell a laptop recently? >>>>>> It was freely given by a better person. >>>>> >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>> >>>> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >>>> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. >>>> He sold it immediately. >>> >>> Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything >>> about selling any computer any time in the last few years. >>> >> >> That's why it was listed on ebay. > > I have no listed anything on ebay in my life. Seriously, you either have me > confused with someone else or are trolling. Craigslist > >> You were just showing ot off. > > Again, I think you have me confused with someone else. What post are you > even referencing? > Anybady can search comp.os.linux.advocacy and see your listing. >> Right. >> Fuck off, jackass. > > And now you have me confused with you. :) Right, I begged for a laptop in cola. -- SpringSprangSprung
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-09 12:01 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D50FD32C.9DFB1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| In reply to | #628036 |
On 4/9/17, 11:56 AM, in article oce04j$joa$9@dont-email.me, "Sprang" <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:54:22 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On 4/9/17, 11:47 AM, in article ocdvjn$joa$7@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>>>>>> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >>>>>>> Did you sell a laptop recently? >>>>>>> It was freely given by a better person. >>>>>> >>>>>> ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. >>>>> A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his >>>>> wofe. >>>>> He sold it immediately. >>>> >>>> Maybe you have me confused with someone else? I know I not said anything >>>> about selling any computer any time in the last few years. >>>> >>> >>> That's why it was listed on ebay. >> >> I have no listed anything on ebay in my life. Seriously, you either have me >> confused with someone else or are trolling. > > Craigslist Same thing: no such sales. You have me confused with someone else (or are trolling). >>> You were just showing ot off. >> >> Again, I think you have me confused with someone else. What post are you >> even referencing? > > Anybady can search comp.os.linux.advocacy and see your listing. I made no such listing in COLA, either. Again, you have me confused with someone else or are just trolling (and it is seemingly increasingly likely it is the latter). >>> Right. >>> Fuck off, jackass. >> >> And now you have me confused with you. :) > > Right, I begged for a laptop in cola. You may have, but if you did I did not see it. I know it is something I would ever do. But what does this have to do with your name calling and insults and confusing me with others or just flat out making up stories. Oh. You just wanted attention. Hint: step up your game or stop getting it from me. Your choice. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-13 17:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.yym5gthdjs98qf@red.lan> |
| In reply to | #628022 |
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:35:57 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: > On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:35:55 +0100, James Wilkinson Sword, after 15 edits, wrote this: >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 19:27:38 +0100, Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:27:32 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>> On 4/9/17, 11:00 AM, in article ocdssp$afj$2@dont-email.me, "Sprang" >>>> <spring@sprung.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 10:57:51 -0700, Snit, after 15 edits, wrote this: >>>>>> On 4/9/17, 10:35 AM, in article op.yyfu4ma1js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson >>>>>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> In the UK we have a bottomless pit called the NHS which sucks the life out >>>>>>>>> of everyone in taxes. If you weren't ill to start with, you soon will be. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a similar thing in the US called Obamacare. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So only since your Muslim president got in then. >>>>>> >>>>>> The US never had one. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Will Trump not remove that nonsense? >>>>>> >>>>>> He promised to and said it would be easy. Then he tried... and found out >>>>>> people push back when you threaten them with removing programs that saved >>>>>> their lives. >>>>>> >>>>>> Weird, eh? >>>>> >>>>> It's hardly weird that people like other people paying for them. >>>> >>>> I know... many who wanted to get rid of ObamaCare do not want to have to pay >>>> for their own health insurance. Oh well... deal with it. >>>> >>>>> It's the American dream... For Losers. >>>> >>>> Thankfully it seems like it is not going anywhere and the freeloaders will >>>> not get their way. >>>> >>>> I have been predicting for years, though, that the Republicans will seek to >>>> modify it a little and then rebrand it so they are not forever tied with >>>> being against one of the most popular programs in modern history. >>> >>> Being one of the freeloaders, it's funny you need to feel better. >>> Did you sell a laptop recently? >>> It was freely given by a better person. >> >> ? >> > > He has a history in comp.os.linux.advocacy. > A poster there sent him a laptop, freely and out of kindness, for his wofe. > He sold it immediately. So what? I've done the same many a time. People just want rid of things and can't be bothered selling them. I do it for them. -- Why isn't 11 pronounced onety one?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 21 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 21 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web